Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the medical student knowledge regarding pediatric palliative care (PPC) and determine the predictors of knowledge among them toward PPC.
Methods
A cross-sectional engaging study was directed with 326 medical students studying in Jordanian universities. A campaign utilizing online social media and Web-based software were executed to promote, enlist, overview undergraduate medical students, and gather information for this study. The authors employed four techniques to select undergraduate medical students on paid-promoted Facebook, personal messages, and postings in clinical forums.
Results
The results of this study showed that medical students have inadequate knowledge about pediatric palliative care in Jordan. The only factors that predict the knowledge toward PPC is gender.
Conclusion
it should build the medical students' information on pediatric palliative care. The pointer was not significant in the multivariate studies, and that vicariate studies indicated no distinction in the overall scores on either test among the nonmedical students, Training projects ought to be established and delivered to pediatric medical students to improve their knowledge about pediatric palliative/palliative consideration.
Keywords: PPC, Child, Perception, Knowledge
Highlights
-
•
Healthcare experts have revealed that they feel overwhelmed while experiencing children’ death.
-
•
Medical students have inadequate knowledge about pediatric palliative care in Jordan.
-
•
Training projects ought to be established and delivered to pediatric medical students to improve their knowledge about pediatric palliative/palliative consideration.
1. Introduction
Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is described as the effective and absolute supervision of a child's mind, spirit, and body while caring for the families [[1], [2]]. Pediatric palliative care proceeds from the diagnosis of any life-threatening sickness using several techniques to help minimize the intensity of symptoms. The Word Health Organization (WHO) [1] stated that about 21.6 million children globally require some level of PPC [3], and a 2011 survey uncovered that 65.6% of states did not have any PPC administrations, and just 5.7% had incorporated it into standard healthcare. Anticipating the developing significance of PPC in the previous decade, numerous states have begun building up their administration systems. The regulations are refining existing support methodologies, including developed nations, for example, Australia [4], Canada [5], and the UK [6], and center and developing nations like Belarus, Indonesia, and Malawi [7]. In Hong, the progress of auxiliary PPC has quite recently.
In the recent years, the PPC carried out in Jordan has been exclusively conveyed by a private institute, the King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC). Until 2012, the KHCC has expanded the services from children with cancer to children with life-threatening diseases. Given that the turn of events and arrangement of local PPC administrations were inadequate. The Hospital Authority has recently proposed combining a specialized PPC group into standard services alongside the opening of the Hong Kong Children's Hospital in mid-2019 [8]. As PPC administrations expand, medicinal services experts' knowledge and capacities are questioned.
Various analyses have explored the apparent difficulties of healthcare service providers in offering PPC. For example, it has been accounted for that a larger part of pediatric oncologists in the UK and North America have found out about PPC through "experimentation," which inclines patients to needless damage [9]. Healthcare experts have revealed that they feel overwhelmed while experiencing children’ death [10,11], unable to perceive the significance of family-focused social consideration issues in PPC [12], and subsequently experiencing issues in deciding the best medication for children [13], particularly when PPC referral was required [14]. In Jordan, pediatric physicians have seen PPC as trying considering its differences from adult mitigation alongside issues of the juvenile turn of events, low staff support [15], and the deficient passionate adapting abilities of all included [[15], [16], [17]]. As these difficulties have not yet been settled, there is a need to quickly improve the nature of care conveyed to future PPC children. The apparent problems of PPC have frequently been attributed to restricted exposure in undergrad and postgraduate studies [[17], [18], [19], [20], [21]]. Also, many students have constrained genuine involvement in children [20] needing PPC [22]. Truth is told, the significance of undergrad studies has been emphasized in a few types of research [23,24].
For the most part, all related methodological analyses have indicated modification in students' knowledge about crucial palliative care standards [25,26]. Regardless, conflicting outcomes were found in the adequacy of PPC training to invigorate students' reflection and improve their moral understanding [26]. Such varieties may arise because of the particular setting of educational plans, students' previous exposure, and their view of PPC. Considering that the undergraduate years are a brilliant period for cultivating healthcare experts' ability and enthusiasm in palliative care [26], it is important to see how medical see PPC while evaluating their educational needs. Among places where PPC is still in its early stages, this is the principal study concentrating on the knowledge, mentalities, and convictions alongside the educational needs of medical students for offering compelling PPC. So, this study aims to examine the medical student knowledge regarding pediatric palliative care (PPC) and determine the predictors of knowledge among them toward PPC.
2. Study method
A cross-sectional study utilizing social media was used to select qualified undergraduate medical students. Qualified undergraduate medical students were all students at Jordanian government universities. From April 1st through July 1st, 2020, a campaign utilizing online social media and Web-based software was executed to promote, enlist, overview undergraduate medical students, and gather information for this study. The authors employed four techniques to select undergraduate medical students on paid-promoted Facebook, personal messages, and postings in clinical forums. Interested students were informed that their cooperation might add to an expansion in the comprehension of the PPC knowledge. Undergraduate medical students were guaranteed that their recognizable healthcare data is safe because of the severe protection and security in this research. Before, undergraduate medical students can consent to take an interest in the study voluntarily; undergraduate medical students need to press the attached link that guided them to the online survey.
The survey links were given online by the research assistants. The informed consent form was attached online with the overview poll that should be marked willfully to be the undergraduate medical students before finishing the study. Students consent to sign an informed consent form; he/she completes a survey online. It took them around 10 min to finish the study. The research assistant collected the response to the online surveys in a spreadsheet and kept them in a secured personal computer. During writing of the manuscript, the authors were checked for the meeting for all STROCSS guidelines [27].
2.1. Instruments
The English version of the palliative Care Quiz of Nursing (PCQN) was utilized to gauge undergraduate medical students' knowledge into palliative care created by Ross, McDonald, and McGuinness in 1996 [18]. This instrument was show validity for another major, this why the authors used to measure palliative care knowledge among medical students. It was utilized on the grounds that English is the medium of instructions of clinical universities in Jordan. The PCQN contains 20 statements; the responses being true, false, or don't know. For each finished poll, the overall score was determined (the entirety of the number of accurately addressed items). This score can hypothetically run from 20 (least score) to 100 (greatest score). In any case, PCQN has 3 subscales (hypothetical classifications) that incorporate the accompanying classifications: theory and standards of palliative care (items 1, 9, 12, 17), pain and symptoms management (2–20 articles excluding 5,9,12 & 17), and psychosocial and religious care (items 5, 11 & 19). Knowledge scores were classified into poor knowledge ≤50%, fair knowledge (65-50%), and (≥65%) satisfactory knowledge. The internal consistency of the 20 item quiz was 0.78 indicating high internal consistency [15]. Nevertheless, there are three sub-scales in PCQN: (a) philosophy and PPC principles (elements 1,9, 12,17); (b) pain and management of symptoms (elements 2–4, 6–8, 10, 13–16, 18,20); and (c) psychosocial and spiritual attention (elements 5,11,19). The PCQN's main consistency of 0.78 is considered high.
2.2. Ethical consideration
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) IRB affirmed this study. Qualified undergraduate medical students were given detailed data about the objectives of the study, for example, the study to utilize the data to help the college and the community, privacy of the parent's subtleties, the exploration will keep up the anonymity of the undergraduate medical students to the chief specialist and JUST's Human Research Protections Office. Also, the study was registered in UIN Research Registry 6655. The link is https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#user-researchregistry/registerresearchdetails/604e7953e5dc80001b82e131.
2.3. Statistical analysis
Statistical packages IBM® SPSS adaptation 24.0 was used for descriptive statistics were utilized in portraying the socioeconomics of the study subject and the demographic characteristics. Means, range, medians and standard deviations were utilized as constant factors, while rates and frequencies were utilized for assembled measures. All the assumptions of multiple regressions were checked.
3. Results
3.1. Demographic characteristics
A total of 326 medical students successfully completed the study survey. Students from either gender participated in this study, 111 females (34%) and 215 males (66%). students’ demographic and academic characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of medical students (n = 326).
| Variable | Frequency | (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 111 | 34.0 |
| Female | 215 | 66.0 |
| Nationality | ||
| Jordanian | 304 | 93.3 |
| Other | 22 | 6.7 |
| Age M = 20.99(SD = 2.15) | ||
| Mother education | ||
| Primary or secondary | 68 | 20.9 |
| Diploma | 46 | 14.1 |
| Bachelor | 124 | 38.0 |
| Graduate | 88 | 27.0 |
| Father education | ||
| Primary or secondary | 59 | 18.1 |
| Diploma | 87 | 26.7 |
| Bachelor | 124 | 38.0 |
| Graduate | 56 | 17.2 |
| College level | ||
| First year | 88 | 27.0 |
| Second year | 45 | 13.8 |
| Third year | 62 | 19.0 |
| Fourth year | 51 | 15.6 |
| Fifth year | 58 | 17.8 |
| Sixth year | 19 | 5.9 |
| Income | ||
| Less than 400 | 31 | 9.5 |
| 400 to 600 | 41 | 12.6 |
| 600 to 800 | 28 | 8.6 |
| 800 to 1000 | 72 | 22.1 |
| More than 1000 | 154 | 47.2 |
| Area of living | ||
| City | 222 | 68.1 |
| Village | 104 | 31.9 |
3.2. Knowledge about palliative care
The mean score of knowledge was low at 50 (SD: 7.38; range: 20 to 100). The items1, 12,16,18 had the rightest answers 86%, 88%, 91%, and 92%, individually. These items related to pain and symptom management class. All medical students' performance on these chosen items were agreeable, by and large execution of different items of theory and standards of palliative care and psychosocial and profound care was not satisfactory. The effects of this study show that medical students have inadequate knowledge about palliative care in Jordan. For instance, they accepted that the degree of sickness could decide the strategy for pain management (item 3, false), that loss of a far off connection is simpler to overcome than the loss of one that is close relatives (item 19, false), and that placebo treatment is powerful in rewarding pain (item 13, false) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Response of medical students to PPC statements (N = 326).
| Items | True |
Not Know |
False |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Count | % | Count | % | |
|
10 | 3% | 35 | 10.7% | 281 | 86% |
|
64 | 20% | 48 | 14.7% | 214 | 66% |
|
56 | 17% | 71 | 21.8% | 199 | 61% |
|
24 | 7% | 71 | 21.8% | 231 | 71% |
|
192 | 59% | 83 | 25.5% | 51 | 16% |
|
138 | 42% | 75 | 23.0% | 113 | 35% |
|
141 | 43% | 97 | 29.8% | 88 | 27% |
|
57 | 17% | 54 | 16.6% | 215 | 66% |
|
183 | 56% | 75 | 23.0% | 68 | 21% |
|
21 | 6% | 60 | 18.4% | 245 | 75% |
|
44 | 13% | 83 | 25.5% | 199 | 61% |
|
20 | 6% | 19 | 5.8% | 287 | 88% |
|
115 | 35% | 82 | 25.2% | 129 | 40% |
|
107 | 33% | 59 | 18.1% | 160 | 49% |
|
99 | 30% | 70 | 21.5% | 157 | 48% |
|
4 | 1% | 24 | 7.4% | 298 | 91% |
|
259 | 79% | 50 | 15.3% | 17 | 5% |
|
13 | 4% | 14 | 4.3% | 299 | 92% |
|
142 | 44% | 90 | 27.6% | 94 | 29% |
|
17 | 5% | 65 | 19.9% | 244 | 75% |
3.3. Multiple regression analyses
Multiple regressions were utilized to predict medical students' impression of perception toward PPC (age, gender, training level, work understanding, and occupational role). Table 3 sums up the results of the multiple regression tests. The entirety of the recorded variables is not related to the view of PPC (p > 0.05) except gender (B = 2.75, p = 0.01).
Table 3.
Predictors of pediatric palliative care among medical students.
| Model | Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t | Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. Error | Beta | ||||
| 1 | (Constant) | 77.322 | 4.560 | 16.957 | .000 | |
| Gender | 2.473 | .949 | .149 | 2.606 | .010 | |
| Prevention reasons | -.753 | .362 | -.119 | −2.081 | .038 | |
| Income | -.398 | .382 | -.070 | −1.042 | .298 | |
| Living | −1.678 | 1.002 | -.099 | −1.675 | .095 | |
| Nationality | −1.221 | 1.767 | -.039 | -.691 | .490 | |
| Year | .008 | .285 | .002 | .029 | .977 | |
| Father Education | -.109 | .563 | -.013 | -.193 | .847 | |
| Mother Education | -.744 | .522 | -.101 | −1.425 | .155 | |
Dependent Variable: palliative care.
4. Discussion
The medical profession is one of the main occupations in the PPC team undergraduate medical students are the future physicians and most important in the team, they assume a vital role in practically speaking and improving the PPC [[28], [29], [30]]. So, the most recent studies were centered on surveying the medical professionals' knowledge in alternate circumstances and settings [[31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. Various analyses evaluated the experiments of end-of-life convictions, experience, aptitude, and the propriety of the working environment settings concerning progressive learning of palliative care among medical students in services [29]. The researchers conduct a cross-sectional study that included 326 medical students.
The research outcomes indicate that most undergraduate medical students perceived the significance of PPC. The fascinating finding is that although they obviously recognized PPC from end-of-life or terminal care, a large number of them – proposed that, inside the pediatric setting, PPC is best given when therapeutic treatment is not an alternative. Although the WHO rules grasp an integrative methodology from the time of analysis, most undergraduate medical students characterized the fair delegation for PPC in a significantly prohibitive connotation.
Three of the studies found a lack of knowledge about PPC among physicians [[38], [39], [40]]. The first study was embraced in Canada St-Laurent-Gagnonet et al. [38]. This study surveyed the idea of palliative care of a gathering of physicians in tertiary care of the pediatric care group of emergency clinics. Twelve physicians take an interest in the study. These physicians had a constrained idea of palliative care to the help of physical manifestations. Additionally, they didn't have data about the best and ideal opportunity to present the administration since they were not open to utilizing the palliative care term. In two review studies led in Florida and California Thompson et al. [39], researchers found that around half of the participants characterized palliative care equivalent to palliative care, and the other portion of them showed that they want to refer patients when corrective treatment was no longer suitable. Balkin et al. [40], characterized palliative care as the finish of life care started when every therapeutic choice has fizzled, and physicians' competence when managing pediatrics confronting perilous ailment was fundamentally higher when the physician got training in palliative care. Different studies researched the human services supplier's information and disposition about PPC and looking at the information and demeanor between experts [37,40,[41], [42]]. In a Malaysian study, including 292 undergraduate medical students, 69 pediatricians, and 223 medical students, the outcomes were just a quarter of the responders thought they have fundamental palliative care knowledge, about a third believe, morphine utilized in palliative care is addictive, and the author presumes that there is an absence of knowledge and comprehension of palliative care among healthcare services suppliers [40]. So also, in Ukraine Detsyk et al. [41] led a review to survey the familiarity with pediatric palliative care among healthcare workers. The study participants were 578 healthcare workers (131 professionals, 52 pediatricians, 36 residents, 78 healthcare supervisors, and 281 medical students).
The results showed that a quarter of undergraduate medical students didn't have an idea about the meaning of PPC, about 32% of the medical students recognize that two – thirds of member inferred it as for patients with the disease (medical students speak to 71.5% of their answers), and inferred that most of the respondents displayed a marked absence of knowledge in PPC. In another study, Spruit et al. [37] led a cross-sectional study concentrate on the United States. The study was meant to assess pediatric oncology healthcare service providers' information and convictions with respect to PPC. Just about 156 healthcare professionals took an interest in the study from different occupations (medical students and physicians). The outcomes uncovered that the greater part of the medical students studied, they did not get palliative care instruction or education, and Just 22% of physicians revealed that likewise, the author inferred that even the advancement in PPC accessibility, care offerings remain not in the degree of suggestion.
Another novel commitment of this study is the utilization of multivariate studies to figure out which variables may influence pediatric medical students' knowledge of palliative care, palliative approaches, and administrations. Utilizing the system of Cramer et al. [43], indicated that few of these elements are un-modifiable, for example, race/ethnicity and gender, and a few are modifiable, like, getting formal preparation and number of children in a medical students' caseload [43]. In any case, the outcomes from our multivariate studies recommend that across both tests, having worked in palliative care and having formal preparations were the main two regular factors that fundamentally expanded pediatric medical students' knowledge.
All past work involvement with a palliative isn't modifiable fundamentally; recruiting pediatric medical students with some palliative experience may bring about lower preparing needs and, at last, lower preparing costs. Receipt of formal palliative care preparation is a modifiable factor, and organizations that desire to create, refine, or extend pediatric palliative care projects should fuse a medical student preparing segment, it should build the medical students' information on pediatric palliative care. The pointer was not significant in the multivariate studies, and that vicariate studies indicated no distinction in the overall scores on either test among the nonmedical students, it may be the case that the medical students' degree of knowledge didn't contrast, or it may be the case that the instruments can't separate between the known groups. Psychometric studies ought to be performed to decide whether these instruments are substantial and dependable for pediatric medical students, and if not, new instruments should be created.
4.1. Limitations
It worth to mention the fact that these findings may not necessarily be applicable to all medical students in different institutions worldwide based on the culture and religion which may require different educational program based on the demographical characteristics. Another limitation disadvantage of using a convenience sample is the limitation in generalization and inference making about the entire population. Since the sample is not representative of the population, the results of the study cannot speak for the entire population.
5. Conclusion
In summary, the medical profession is one of the main occupations in the PPC team undergraduate medical students are the future physicians and most important in the team, they assume a vital role in practically speaking and improving the PPC. This study aimed at examining the medical student knowledge regarding pediatric palliative care (PPC) and determine the predictors of knowledge among them toward PPC. The finding of this study found that medical students had inadequate knowledge about palliative care in Jordan. The only factor that predicts the knowledge toward PPC among them is gender. Training projects ought to be established and delivered to pediatric medical students to improve their knowledge about pediatric palliative/palliative consideration.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Ethical approval
This study was got approval from Jordan University of Science and Technology IRB.
Consent
Confirm consent was gotten from all patients
Sources of funding
No funding was provided.
Author contribution
All authors should have made substantial contributions to all of the following:
-
(1)
the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data,
-
(2)
drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content,
-
(3)
final approval of the version to be submitted.
Registration of research studies
-
1.
Name of the registry: Jordan University of Science and Technology
-
2.
Unique Identifying number or registration ID: 20202345
-
3.
Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and willbe checked):
Declaration of competing interest
No conflict of interest of any author.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102246.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 1998. Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care in Children. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldman A. ABC of palliative care. Special problems of children. BMJ. 1998;316(7124):49–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Connor S.R., Downing J., Marston J. Estimating the global need for palliative care for children: a cross-sectional analysis. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;53(2):171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Government of Australia . Department of Health; 2018. National Palliative Care Strategy 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Government of Canada . Health Canada; 2018. Framework on Palliative Care in Canada. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Villanueva G., Murphy M.S., Vickers D., Harrop E., Dworzynski K. End of life care for infants, children and young people with life limiting conditions: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2016;355:i6385. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Downing J., Powell R.A., Marston J., Huwa C., Chandra L., Garchakova A. Children's palliative care in low- and middle-income countries. Arch. Dis. Child. 2016;101(1):85–90. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hospital Authority . Hospital Authority: Hong Kong; 2017. Strategic Service Framework for Palliative Care. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hilden J.M., Emanuel E.J., Fairclough D.L., Link M.P., Foley K.M., Clarridge B.C. Attitudes and practices among pediatric oncologists regarding end-of-life care: results of the 1998 American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001;19(1):205–212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.1.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abuhammad S., Mufleh S., Alzoubi K.H., Almasri R. Pediatrics palliative care from nursing and PharmD perspectives. Pediatr. Int. 2021 Feb 3;10(2):23–27. doi: 10.1111/ped.14631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abuhammad S., Muflih S., Alzoubi K.H., Gharaibeh B. Nursing and PharmD undergraduate students' attitude toward the “do not resuscitate” order for children with terminally ill diseases. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2021;14:425–434. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S298384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O'Shea E.R., Lavallee M., Doyle E.A., Moss K. Assessing palliative and end-of-life educational needs of pediatric health care professionals: results of a statewide survey. Journal of Palliative & Palliative Nursing. 2017;19(5) [Google Scholar]
- 13.Serwint J.R., Rutherford L.E., Hutton N. Personal and professional experiences of pediatric residents concerning death. J. Palliat. Med. 2006;9(1):70–81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sheetz M.J., Bowman M.A. Pediatric palliative care: an assessment of physicians' confidence in skills, desire for training, and willingness to refer for end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;25(2):100–105. doi: 10.1177/1049909107312592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chan W.C.H., Wong K.L.Y., Leung M.M.M., Lin M.K.Y. Perceived challenges in pediatric palliative care among physicians and nurses in Hong Kong. Death Stud. 2019;43(6):372–380. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2018.1478912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Papadatou D., Martinson I.M., Chung P.M. Caring for dying children: a comparative study of nurses' experiences in Greece and Hong Kong. Canc. Nurs. 2001;24(5):402–412. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200110000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yam B.M., Rossiter J.C., Cheung K.Y. Caring for dying infants: experiences of neonatal intensive care nurses in Hong Kong. J. Clin. Nurs. 2001;10(5):651–659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khaneja S., Milrod B. Educational needs among pediatricians regarding caring for terminally ill children. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1998;152(9):909–914. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.9.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roth M., Wang D., Kim M., Moody K. An assessment of the current state of palliative care education in pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship training. Pediatr. Blood Canc. 2009;53(4):647–651. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sahler O.J.Z., Frager G., Levetown M., Cohn F.G., Lipson M.A. Medical education about end-of-life care in the pediatric setting: principles, challenges, and opportunities. Pediatrics. 2000;105(3):575. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.3.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weissmann P.F., Branch W.T., Gracey C.F., Haidet P., Frankel R.M. Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts. Acad. Med. 2006;81(7):661–667. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000232423.81299.fe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rapoport A., Obwanga C., Sirianni G., Librach S.L., Husain A. Not just little adults: palliative care physician attitudes toward pediatric patients. J. Palliat. Med. 2013;16(6):675–679. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liben S., Papadatou D., Wolfe J. Paediatric palliative care: challenges and emerging ideas. Lancet. 2008;371(9615):852–864. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61203-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Downing J., Knapp C., Muckaden M.A., Fowler-Kerry S., Marston J., Committee I.S. Priorities for global research into children's palliative care: results of an International Delphi Study. BMC Palliat. Care. 2015;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0031-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.O'Shea E.R., Campbell S.H., Engler A.J., Beauregard R., Chamberlin E.C., Currie L.M. Effectiveness of a perinatal and pediatric end-of-life nursing education consortium (ELNEC) curricula integration. Nurse Educ. Today. 2015;35(6):765–770. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chang H.H., Hu W.Y., Tsai S.S., Yao C.A., Chen C.Y., Chiu T.Y. Reflections on an end-of-life care course for preclinical medical students. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2009;108(8):636–643. doi: 10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60384-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Agha R., Abdall-Razak A., Crossley E., Dowlut N., Iosifidis C., Mathew G., for the STROCSS Group The STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int. J. Surg. 2019;72:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barnard D., Quill T., Hafferty F.W., Arnold R., Plumb J., Bulger R. Preparing the ground: contributions of the undergraduate yearsto medical education for care near the end of life. Working group on the pre-clinical years of the national consensus conference on medical education for care near the end of life. Acad. Med. 1999;74(5):499–505. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199905000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ross M.M., McDonald B., McGuinness J. The palliative care quiz for nursing (PCQN): the development of an instrument to measure nurses' knowledge of palliative care. J. Adv. Nurs. 1996;23(1):126–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb03106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fitch M.I., Fliedner M.C., O'Connor M. Nursing perspectives on palliative care 2015. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2015;4(3):150–155. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2015.07.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guimarães T.M., Silva LF da, Santo F.H.E., Moraes JRMM de. Palliative care in pediatric oncology in nursing students' perception. Esc Anna Nery - Rev Enferm. 2016;20(2):261–267. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Al Qadire M. Knowledge of palliative care: an online survey. Nurse Educ. Today. 2014;34(5):714–718. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.019. Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Knapp C.A., Madden V., Wang H., Kassing K., Curtis C., Sloyer P. Paediatric nurses' knowledge of palliative care in Florida: a quantitative study. Int. J. Palliat. Nurs. 2009;15(9):432–439. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2009.15.9.44255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Verri E.R., Bitencourt N.A.S., Oliveira JA. da S., Santos Júnior R dos, Marques H.S., Porto M.A. Profissionais de enfermagem: compreensão sobre cuidados paliativos pediátricos TT - nursing professionals: understanding about pediatric palliative care. Rev enferm UFPE line (Internet) 2019;13(1):126–136. https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/234924/31141%0Ahttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/234924/31140 Available from: [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen C.H., Huang L.C., Liu H.L., Lee H.Y., Wu S.Y., Chang Y.C. To explore the neonatal nurses' beliefs and attitudes towards caring for dying neonates in Taiwan. Matern. Child Health J. 2013;17(10):1793–1801. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1199-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.David Anita, Banerjee Sonali. Effectiveness of “palliative care information booklet” in enhancing nurses' knowledge. Indian J. Palliat. Care. 2010;16(3):164–167. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.73647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spruit J.L., Bell C.J., Toly V.B., Prince-Paul M. Knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors related to palliative care delivery among pediatric oncology health care providers. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2018;35(4):247–256. doi: 10.1177/1043454218764885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.St-Laurent-Gagnon T., Carnevale F.A., Duval M. Pediatric palliative care: a qualitative study of physicians' perspectives in a tertiary care university hospital. J. Palliat. Care. 2008 Mar;24(1):26–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Thompson L.A., Knapp C., Madden V., Shenkman E. Pediatricians' perceptions of and preferred timing for pediatric palliative care. Pediatrics. 2009 May 1;123(5):e777–e782. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chong L., Khalid F. Paediatric palliative care in Malaysia: survey of knowledge base and barriers to referral. Prog. Palliat. Care. 2014;22(4):195–200. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Detsyk O.Z., Zolotarova Z.M., Stovban I.V., Melnyk R.M. Awareness of pediatric palliative care among health care workers. Wiad. Lek. 2018;71(3 pt 1):574–578. Warsaw, Poland. 1960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Balkin E.M., Sleeper L.A., Kirkpatrick J.N., Swetz K.M., Coggins M.K., Wolfe J., Blume E.D. Physician perspectives on palliative care for children with advanced heart disease: a comparison between pediatric cardiology and palliative care physicians. J. Palliat. Med. 2018;21(6):773–779. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cramer C.F. To live until you die. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2010 Feb 1;14(1) doi: 10.1188/10.CJON.53-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.