Skip to main content
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife logoLink to International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
. 2021 Feb 17;14:161–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.01.012

First record of Metapolystoma (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) from Boophis tree frogs in Madagascar, with the description of five new species

Willem Landman a,, Olivier Verneau a,b,c, Liliane Raharivololoniaina d, Louis du Preez a,e
PMCID: PMC8056147  PMID: 33898217

Abstract

Although Madagascar has more than 350 frog species of which all but two are endemic to the island, the known polystome (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) diversity parasitizing Malagasy frogs is low, encompassing five species of Madapolystoma, one species of Kankana and one Metapolystoma. Investigating the parasite diversity of frog parasites at selected Malagasy localities led to the discovery of undescribed polystomes. Five treefrogs, Boophis albilabris, Boophis doulioti, Boophis luteus, Boophis madagascariensis and Boophis occidentalis were found to be infected and are reported here as hosts for new Metapolystoma species. Morphological investigation, combining examination of body length, haptor length, genital bulb width, genital crown diameter, genital spine number, genital spine length, ovary length, egg length, hamulus length, hamulus guard length and hamulus hook length, revealed five distinct morphotypes. Phylogenetic analysis and genetic divergences obtained for three of the five morphotypes, support the distinction of new species. Metapolystoma ansuanum n. sp. is described from B. luteus, Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. from B. doulioti, Metapolystoma multiova n. sp. from B. occidentalis, Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. from B. madagascareniensis and Metapolystoma vencesi n. sp. from B. albilabris. Finally, although the validity of Metapolystoma as taxon is not fully resolved yet, the phylogenetic position of the described species and their morphology provide clear evidence for new metapolystome taxa.

Keywords: Boophis, Madagascar, Metapolystoma, Monogenea, Polystomes

Graphical abstract

Image 1

1. Introduction

Madagascar is well known for its high species diversity and endemicity, particularly in the cases of plants and vertebrates (Myers et al., 2000). When it comes to amphibian diversity, Madagascar is globally ranked in the top twelve (Andreone et al., 2008). Its unique herpetofauna serve as hosts for an equally unique and diverse assemblage of parasites (see Wohltmann et al., 2007; Junker et al., 2010; Rocha et al., 2012; Kuzmin et al., 2013; Landman et al., 2018). However, little is known about Madagascar's anuran polystome flatworm diversity, since only 86 of the 356 known frog species (Frost, 2020) have been screened for polystomes at a few accessible localities in the past (Verneau et al., 2009). Malagasy polystomes are currently represented by four genera encompassing a single chelonian and seven anuran species, all of these were found in the urinary bladder of their host. Uropolystomoides chabaudi (Euzet and Combes, 1965) from Pelomedusa subrufa (Bonnaterre, 1789) is the only polystome known from turtles. Metapolystoma brygoonis (Euzet and Combes, 1964) was the first polystome found within a Malagasy anuran host, as described from Ptychadena mascareniensis (Duméril and Bibron, 1841). Besides these two species, Kankana manampoka Raharivololoniaina et al. 2011 was described from Cophyla pollicaris (Boulenger, 1888). Five other species of Madapolystoma were reported from mantellids, namely Madapolystoma biritika Du Preez et al. (2010) from Mantella madagascariensis (Grandidier, 1872), M. isaloensis Landman et al. (2018) from Mantella expectata Busse and Böhme, 1922 and M. magnahami Landman et al. (2018) from Blommersia domerguei Guibé, 1974. Madapolystoma cryptica Berthier et al. 2014 and M. ramilijaonae Berthier et al. 2014 were conversely described from the same host species Guibemantis liber (Peracca, 1893).

Metapolystoma brygoonis was initially described as Polystoma and later elevated (Combes, 1976). This separation of Metapolystoma and Polystoma was based on morphological characters, including the large extended uterus containing many eggs that fills the largest part of the body and the posterior position of the large ovary (Combes, 1976). The validity of Metapolystoma as a genus has however been under dispute ever since its nested position within Polystoma was demonstrated at the molecular level (Bentz et al., 2001; Verneau et al., 2002; Olson and Tkach, 2005). Up to the present, the three known Metapolystoma species have been described from grass frogs belonging to Ptychadena: M. brygoonis from P. mascareniensis in Madagascar, M. cachani (Gallien, 1956) from Ptychadena longirostris (Peters, 1870) in Ivory Coast and Metapolystoma porosissimae du Preez and Kok 1992, from Ptychadena porosissima (Steindachner, 1867) in South Africa. It was therefore likely that many Madagascan polystomes awaited discovery (Landman et al., 2018).

Among the 27 anuran genera found in Madagascar (Frost, 2020), Boophis Tschudi, 1838 is endemic to Madagascar and the Mayotte Island in the Comoros (Frost, 2020; Glaw and Vences, 2007), hence totalling 79 currently recognised species (Frost, 2020) representing a diverse and species-rich group within the Mantellidae Günter, 1859. During herpetological surveys conducted in Madagascar in 2005, 2006 and 2007, several species of Boophis from different localities were examined for polystome parasites. Boophis albilabris (Boulenger, 1888), Boophis doulioti (Angel, 1934), Boophis luteus (Boulenger, 1882), Boophis madagascariensis (Peters, 1874) and Boophis occidentalis Glaw & Vences, 1994 were found to be infected with five distinct, unknown Metapolystoma species. Since the collection of additional materials was constrained by permit restrictions and administrative difficulties in Madagascar, and because preliminary molecular and morphological data converged towards the same result, our objective was to describe new parasites collected from distinct frog species despite their small sample size.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Host and parasite sampling

Annually during February–March of 2005, 2006 and 2007, several Boophis species were collected in Madagascar (Table 1). Following collection by hand at night, frogs were individually kept overnight in clear plastic bags containing 50 ml of tap water. After 24 h, the water in which the frogs were kept was poured through two plankton sieves with mesh sizes of 500 and 100 μm respectively. The 500 μm sieve retained course debris and most of the faeces, while the 100 μm sieve retained parasite eggs and fine debris. The content of the 100 μm sieve was then washed into a Petri dish and inspected for the presence of polystome eggs using a dissecting microscope. Infected frogs were euthanized with MS222 (Ethyl-3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate) and dissected for parasite investigation using a Nikon SMZ-645 dissecting microscope. Where no eggs were observed, two representatives per species per locality were dissected to check for the presence of non egg-producing polystomes. The kidneys, urinary bladder and accessory bladders were removed and inspected in a Petri dish containing 0.6% Ringers solution. For the purpose of molecular studies, some juvenile polystomes were preserved in absolute ethanol. The remainder of the juvenile polystomes were mounted in ammonium picrate glycerine or preserved in 10% NBF. Adult parasites were fixed in 10% NBF under coverslip pressure. Specimens were rinsed in water, stained with acetocarmine, dehydrated, cleared in xylene and mounted in Canada balsam. Five additional, fixed specimens of B. albilabris collected in 1972 by Mr. Blane at Andringita Massif, Madagascar, and archived at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle of Paris, were dissected and parasites retrieved and processed as explained above. Host and parasite distribution maps (Fig. 1) were drawn in ArcMap 10.5.1 (Esri, California), and shape files for frog distributions were provided by the IUCN (IUCN, 2016a, IUCN, 2016b, IUCN, 2016c, IUCN, 2016d, IUCN, 2016e).

Table 1.

Frog species under survey with their site of collection in Madagascar.

Frog species No. of specimens collected Locality
B. madagascariensis 30 Andasibe (Indri Reserve)
B. albilabris 6 Ambatolahy and Andringita massif
B. doulioti 22 frogs, 10 tadpoles Ankarafantsika
B. luteus 9 Isalo (Cascade des Nymphes Special Reserve)
B. occidentalis 5 Isalo (Cascade des Nymphes Special Reserve)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of Madagascar showing parasite type localities and distribution areas of hosts.

2.2. DNA extraction and amplification

All polystome DNA samples used in this study were sourced from Verneau et al. (2009) and Berthier (2011). According to these authors, DNA extractions were conducted in 100–150 μl of 10% Chelex 100 sodium (Sigma-Aldrich, L'Isle d'Abeau Chesnes, France) with the proteinase K 1 mg·mL−1 final concentration at 55 °C for the duration of 1 to 1,5 h. Enzymatic reactions were stopped at 100 °C for 15 min and DNA were stored at −20 °C until use. Amplifications of 18S, 28S and COI were conducted following the procedure described in Héritier et al. (2015), regardless of the gene of interest or primers used. The complete 18S rRNA gene and the partial 28S rRNA gene were amplified in two rounds with the respective combinations of primers F18/18Rg and 18F3/IR5 for 18S and LSU5’/IR16 and IF15/LSU3′ for 28S. Primer sequences are reported in Sinnappah et al. (2001), Verneau et al. (2009) and Héritier et al. (2015). COI was amplified using the combination of primers L-CO1p/H-Cox1p2 (Littlewood et al., 1997). All PCR products were sent to the Genoscreen Company (Lille, France) for purification and sequencing with their respective forward and reverse PCR primers. Sequences were read and edited with the software Geneious (Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA) to check chromatograms before use for phylogenetic and distance analyses.

2.3. Phylogenetic and distance analyses

All Metapolystoma sequences were edited and aligned independently using Clustal W implemented in MEGA version 7 (Kumar et al., 2016) under default parameters (Thompson et al., 1994). The alignment included five African Polystoma species and a single European Polystoma species, that is, Polystoma integerrimum (Frölich, 1791), which was used as an outgroup according to Bentz et al. (2001). They were subsequently concatenated in a single alignment for Bayesian analysis. The two ribosomal genes were treated as two separate partitions, and the COI genes as three distinct partitions according to their codon position. A two substitution rates model with a proportion of invariable characters was selected for the 18S partition, whereas a GTR + I model was selected for the 28S partition following the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented in Modeltest 3.06 (Posada and Crandall, 1998). Concerning COI, six types of substitutions and gamma rates each comprising four gamma rate categories were applied to the first and second positions, whereas six types of substitutions and invariable-gamma rates each comprising four gamma rate categories were applied to the third position. Evolutionary parameters were estimated independently for all five partitions. The Bayesian analysis was run using MrBayes 3.04b (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001), employing four chains running for ten million generations and sampled every 100 cycles. The Bayesian consensus tree was subsequently drawn after removing the first 10 000 trees (10%) as the burn-in phase, and viewed with TreeView version 1.6 (Page, 1996). Corrected pairwise distances were calculated independently for partial 18S, 28S and COI sequences using the Kimura 2-parameter model and 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA version 7 (Kimura, 1980).

2.4. Morphology and morphometry

Parasites were examined and photographed using a Zeiss Imager Axio10 compound microscope (Zeiss, Germany) fitted with a Zeiss Axio cam 305 camera (Zeiss, Germany). Morphological structures and organs were measured in micrometres using the Zeiss Zen Blue elements (Zeiss, Germany) software program. Hamuli were respectively measured from the apex behind the hook to the tip of the guard (Length X) and to the handle (Length Y), and the hook from tip to base (Length Z). Full-body images of type specimens were taken using a Nikon AZ100M microscope (Nikon, Netherlands) fitted with a low powered 1× objective. Illustrations were done in Adobe Illustrator CC (Adobe, California). Additional taxonomic measurements for M. porosissimae were taken from the type series (Table 2).

Table 2.

Body measurements in micrometres for all Metapolystoma spp. values.

Measurements Metapolystoma vencesi n. sp. Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. Metapolystoma ansuanum n. sp. Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. Metapolystoma multiova n. sp.
Number of mature specimens 6 1 2 1 2
Total length 9190 7871 2680–3952 9086 4915–5537
Greatest width 3496 3272 1035–1436 3208 2257–2419
Width at vagina 2315 1783 804–1001 2011 1469–2086
Haptor length ‒ Body length ratio 0.16 0.19 0.23–0.25 0.18 0.18
Haptor length 1437 1492 669–912 1634 916
Haptor width 2344 2636 1166–1385 2572 1478
Hamulus length X 269‒332 (299 ± 32; 3) 393–407 205 392–408 196‒248 (215 ± 29; 3)
Hamulus length Y 225‒302 (270 ± 40; 3) 303–314 179 252–257 121‒174 (153 ± 23; 4)
Hamulus hook length Z 40‒52 (47) 66–70 62 50–55 58.2
Oral disk 391 297 307–329 486 248–271
Pharynx length 302–420 327 256–308 401 302–405
Pharynx width 291–390 290 183–222 385 289–320
Genital bulb diameter 115 86 64–73 65 86
Ovary length 861 772 265–338 479 446
Ovary width 194 196 98–144 385 158
Number of genital spines 8 8 10 7 6
Genital spine length 31.5–33.4 (32.5 ± 0.6; 9) 24.3–31.6 (27.9 ± 1.78; 18) 24.5–28.5 (26.19 ± 1.16; 5) 28.9–34.9 (32.9 ± 4; 3) 40.4–43.7 (42 ± 1.4; 5)
Genital crown diameter 31.8 25.7 29.4–32.8 24.2–27.6 (25.8 ± 1; 10) 24.5
Sucker diameter 366‒452(424 ± 37; 12) 435‒498(468 ± 29; 6) 241‒305(273 ± 25; 12) 404‒424 (416 ± 8; 6) 329‒356 (339 ± 10; 9)
Maximum number of eggs in utero 367 11 41 176 499+
Egg length 210‒230 (219 ± 7; 16) 161‒185 (171 ± 8; 11) 196‒217 (205 ± 8; 8) 239‒265(250 ± 7; 12) 198‒228 (212 ± 9; 23)
Egg width 120‒147 (130 ± 8; 16) 108‒123 (117 ± 5; 11) 119‒137 (127 ± 7; 8) 136‒152(143 ± 5; 12) 144‒165 (154 ± 7; 23)
Marginal hooklet 1 length 29.7–34.2 (32.5 ± 1.3; 13) 32.6–39.7 (36.9 ± 2.3; 13) 34.3–39.4 (936.2 ± 1.4; 21) 28.6–38.7 (33.8 ± 3.3; 11)
Marginal hooklet 2–7 length 20.8–25 (23.6 ± 1; 30) 21.8–27 (23.8 ± 1.52; 30) 22.3–24.79 23.5 ± 1.17; 4) 22.6–27.2 (24.8 ± 1.1; 44) 21.3–26.9 (24.7 ± 2; 17)
Marginal hooklet 8 length 27.4–32.4 (30.5 ± 1.6; 12) 28.8–33.5 (31.3 ± 1.5; 14) 30.5–34.1 (32.2 ± 1; 19) 28.4–36.3 (32.4 ± 2.8; 5)
Widest section from front 57% 66% 16–65% 51% 50%–57%
Times longer than wide 2.7 2.4 2.6–2.8 2.6 2.2–2.3
Measurement Metapolystoma porosissimaea Metapolystoma brygoonisb Metapolystoma cachanic
Number of mature specimens 15 10 10 3 57
Total length 4150–6710 (5870 ± 0.6; 10) 3400–4800 (4200) 4000 3880–5628 (4594) 3.680–7.250 (5.070)
Greatest width 1570–2360 (2040 ± 0.2; 11) 1220–1500 (1340) 1500 1120–2880 (1793) 1.160–2.880 (1.980)
Width at vagina 1.120–1.700 (1.460 ± 0.2; 11) 650‒1030 (800) 880–1.760 (1.220)
Haptor length ‒ Body length ratio 0.26–0.33 (0.29 ± 0.1; 10) 0.22–0.23 (0.22) 0.25 0.17–0.21 (0.19) 0.15–0.32 (0.23)
Haptor length 1.540–1.800 (1.670 ± 01; 12) 760‒1070 (900) 1000 720‒1072 (864) 910–1.500 (1.15)
Haptor width 2.010–2.660 (2.360 ± 0.2; 12) 1220–1760 (1530) 1500 1248–2800 (1858) 1.300–2.350 (1.730)
Hamulus length X 432‒472 (447 ± 14.3; 26) 330‒420 (380) 310 280‒450 (348) 330‒520 (430)
Hamulus length Y 332.4‒385.7 (361.2 ± 18.52; 13)
Hamulus hook length Z 72‒86.6 (78.3 ± 3.97; 15)
Oral disk 461‒566 (521) 220‒340 (270)
Pharynx length 267‒348 (310 ± 31.8; 10)
Pharynx width 234‒298 (262 ± 20.4; 10)
Genital bulb diameter 93‒129.5 (105.7 ± 11.91; 7) 80 25
Ovary length 546‒755 (651 ± 89.1; 11) 410‒460 (440)
Ovary width 266 90‒160 (120)
Number of genital spines 9–10 8 8
Genital spine length 31/21.83‒25.97 (24.144 ± 1.46; 6) 30‒32 (31)
Genital crown diameter 25.18‒26.96 (26.35 ± 0.57; 7)
Sucker diameter 461‒566 (521 ± 30; 65) 260‒420 (340) 350–400 272–580 × 288–544 (386 × 379) 300‒500 (420)
Maximum number of eggs in utero 250 100–140 70–100 4 8‒390 (170)
Egg length 201‒229 (214 ± 7.2; 30)
192‒207 (197 ± 5.1; 10)
160‒200 (180) 190 176‒208 (200) 122‒159 (0.138)
Egg width 113‒134 (128 ± 6.6; 30)
100‒131 (115 ± 9.3; 10)
90‒120 (100) 120 96‒112 (101)
Marginal hooklet 1 35
Marginal hooklet 2–7 22
Marginal hooklet 8 33
Marginal hooklet 1–2 31 ‒ 34 (33) 30
Marginal hooklet 6–8 31

Values: (Min ‒ Max (Mean ±Ơ; N)), numbers in bold indicate additional measurements taken from species described prior to the present study.

c

From Gallien (1956) (left), Kulo (1981) (middle) and Murith (1981) (right).

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomic summary

Class: Monogenea van Beneden. 1858 Order: Polystomatidea Lebedev. 1988 Family: Polystomatidae Gamble. 1896 Genus: Metapolystoma Combes, 1976.

3.1.1. Metapolystoma vencesi n. sp. (Fig. 2, Fig. 3; Table 2)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ventral view of Metapolystoma vencesi n. sp. holotype. Abbreviations: eg, egg; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito–intestinal canal; ha, hamuli; hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mo, mouth; oc, oncomiracidium; od, oviduct; oi, oö–vitelline canal; os, false oral sucker; ov, ovarium; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; sv, semen vesicle; te, testis; ut, uterus; va, vagina; vd, vas deferens; vi, vitelline; vv, vitello–vaginal canal.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Metapolystoma vencesi n. sp. from Boophis doulioti.a, marginal hooklets 1 (top), 2–7 (middle) and 8 (bottom) from holotype and paratypes; b, hamuli from holotype; c, genital crown from holotype. Abbreviations: X, outer length; Y, inner length; Z, hook length.

3.1.1.1. Type host

Boophis albilabris (Mantellidae)

3.1.1.2. Type locality

Ambatolahy, Madagascar (Fig. 1), (−21.2438667S; 47.4262167E).

3.1.1.3. Site in host

Urinary bladder.

3.1.1.4. Level of infection

One of six frogs examined from Ambatolahy was infected with one mature and four juvenile parasites (prevalence 16.6%). One of four frogs examined from Ambohitantely was infected with seven mature parasites (prevalence 25%). The prevalence for the combined sample was 20% and the mean intensity 6.5.

3.1.1.5. Type material

The morphological description is based on six mature, ten oncomiracidia and four juvenile parasites. Three specimens were sexually mature (Holotype NMBP 578; Paratypes NMBP 579–580) and two immature (Paratypes NMBP 581–582). The holotype and paratypes NMBP 581 and NMBP 582 originated from Ambatolahy, Madagascar, while paratypes NMBP 579 and NMBP 580 originated from Andringita Massif, Madagascar. Juvenile parasites and oncomiracidia were used for marginal hook measurements and drawings. The type material was deposited in the parasitic worm collection, National Museum, Aliwal Street, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa.

3.1.1.6. Voucher material

Remaining specimens in polystome collection, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

3.1.1.7. Zoobank registration

The Life Science Identifier (LSID) of the article is: 59F6A99A-C667-48 EB-9EA4-881D43956065. The life science identifier (LSID) of the new name Metapolystoma vencesi n. sp. Landman et al. is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:680E18A9-64D6-40C9-87D9-1AC5F28A1030.

3.1.1.8. Etymology

In recognition of Professor Miguel Vences, Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany, for his dedication to the study of Madagascan herpetofauna.

3.1.1.9. Description

Measurements reflected in Table 2. Body pyriform (Fig. 2), dorsoventrally flattened, widest section at 57% of total length from anterior end, body length 2.7 times greater than width. Mouth sub-ventral, surrounded by false oral sucker. Posterior haptor 16% of body length, bearing three pairs of haptoral suckers of equal size. Marginal hooklets placed as for other polystomes: pairs one and two between hamuli, pairs three to five embedded in suckers, pairs six to eight found between anterior suckers, pairs one and eight larger than pairs two to seven (Fig. 3a). Well-developed hamuli between posterior-most haptoral suckers without cut between handle and guard (Fig. 3b). Medial pharynx length greater than width, positioned immediately posterior or at the margin of false oral sucker. Intestine bifurcates immediately posterior to pharynx, 8% of total length from most anterior point, converging posteriorly at position of 80% of total length from most anterior point, extending into haptor; no prehaptoral anastomoses. Lateral diverticula length equal to width, found only in last third of intestine. Medial diverticula only posterior to ovary, length greater than width.

Testis follicular, positioned in a narrow band posterior to the ovary, ventral to intestine. Vas deferens widens anteriorly to form sinuous semen vesicle 20–32 (27 ± 5; 1) wide, 179 long, 2% of body length, narrowing towards genital bulb, opening in common genital opening. Genital pore opening on left ventral half, posterior to intestinal ceca bifurcation, 10% of total length from most anterior point. Genital bulb muscular, surrounded by glandular cells, armed with genital crown bearing eight genital spines (Fig. 3c).

Ovary elongate, not lobed, positioned posterior to midbody, length 4.4 times greater than width, measuring 9% of body length. Oviduct 596 long, 29–53 (30 ± 7; 1) wide. Uterus massive and wide, occupying most of body proper, tubiform, convolute, containing 367 ovoid, operculate eggs; some with fully developed oncomiracidia. Hatched intrauterine oncomiracidia present. Mehlis’ gland obscure. Two vaginae 180–420 long, 16–31 wide, on lateral margins, bearing multiple marginal openings, vaginal vestibule elongate, positioned at 18% from anterior. Vitellaria extended throughout most of body and haptor, surrounds female reproductive organs. Genito-intestinal canal prominent, 580 long, 40–133 (62 ± 28; 11) wide, situated posterior to ovary.

3.1.2. Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. (Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7; Table 2)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Ventral view of Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. holotype. Abbreviations: eg, egg; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito–intestinal canal; ha, hamuli; hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mg, Mehlis gland; mo, mouth; oc, oncomiracidium; od, oviduct; oi, oö–vitelline canal; oö, oötype; os, false oral sucker; ov, ovarium; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; sv, semen vesicle; te, testis; ut, uterus; va, vagina; vc, vaginal canal; vd, vas deferens; vi, vitelline; vl, vitelline duct; vv, vitello–vaginal canal.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. from Boophis doulioti. a, marginal hooklets 1 (top), 2–7 (middle) and 8 (bottom) from holotype and paratypes; b, hamuli from holotype; c, hamulus development; d, genital crown from holotype.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Ventral view of Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. from Boophis doulioti, neotenic form. Abbreviations: gb, genital bulb; gc, genito–intestinal canal; hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mg, Mehlis gland; mo, mouth; od, oviduct; oi, oö–vitelline canal; oö, oötype; os, false oral sucker; ov, ovarium; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; te, testis; ut, uterus; vi, vitelline; vl, vitelline duct; vv.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. from Boophis doulioti, neotenic form. a, marginal hooklets 2–7; b, marginal hooklets 8; c, marginal hooklet 1.

3.1.2.1. Type host

Boophis doulioti (Mantellidae).

3.1.2.2. Type locality

Ankarafantsika, Madagascar (Fig. 1), (16.115976S; 47.095631E).

3.1.2.3. Site in host

Gills of tadpoles and urinary bladder of mature frogs.

3.1.2.4. Level of infection

Three of 22 frogs collected were infected. One mature and 13 juvenile parasites were recovered, with a maximum of 12 recovered from a single host (prevalence 13.6%. mean intensity 4.7). Seven of 10 tadpoles collected were infected with a total of 13 neotenic parasites, while as many as three parasites were infecting a single host (prevalence 70%; mean intensity 1.85). Though the name neotenic for some polystomes can be confusing (see Badets and Verneau, 2009), it refers here to egg producing parasites that were recovered from the gills of tadpoles.

3.1.2.5. Type material

Morphological descriptions are based on one mature parasite, eight juveniles and seven neotenics. One sexually mature specimen (Holotype NMBP 560), four immature bladder parasites (Paratypes NMBP 561–564) and four neotenics (Paratypes NMBP 565–568), all from the type locality, were deposited in the parasitic worm collection, National Museum, Aliwal Street, Bloemfontein 9301.

3.1.2.6. Voucher material

Remaining specimens in polystome collection, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

3.1.2.7. Zoobank registration.

The Life Science Identifier (LSID) of the article is: 59F6A99A-C667-48 EB-9EA4-881D43956065. The LSID of the new name Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. Landman et al. is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FB1716E2-5C61–4C53-9A2F-BB364D6782A8.

3.1.2.8. Etymology

The species epithet refers to the exceptionally long curved tips of marginal hooklets two to seven (falcatum = sickle shaped, curved, hooked, armed with scythes).

3.1.2.9. Description

Mature parasite (Fig. 4‒5).

Measurements reflected in Table 2. Body pyriform (Fig. 4), dorsoventrally flat, widest section at 66% of total length from anterior end, body length 2.4 times greater than width. Mouth sub-ventral, surrounded by false oral sucker. Posterior haptor 19% of body length bearing three pairs of haptoral suckers equal in size. Marginal hooklets placed as for other polystomes and as described for M. vencesi n. sp., pairs one and eight larger than pairs two to seven (Fig. 5a). Well-developed hamuli between posterior-most haptoral suckers with deep cut between handle and guard (Fig. 5b). Hamuli development presented in Fig. 5c. Medial pharynx length greater than width, positioned immediately posterior to or at the margin of false oral sucker. Intestine bifurcates immediately posterior to pharynx at 11% from anterior, converging posteriorly at 82% from anterior, stretching in between haptoral suckers; no prehaptoral anastomoses. Intestine bears lateral diverticula, length equal to width. Medial diverticula only posterior to ovary, length greater than width.

Testis follicular, only a small section visible, positioned directly posterior to the ovary, ventral to intestine. Vas deferens widens anteriorly to form sinuous semen vesicle 23–40 (30 ± 6; 1) wide, 301 long, measuring 4% of total length, narrowing towards genital bulb, opening in common genital opening. Genital pore opening mid-ventral, posterior to intestinal ceca bifurcation at 12% from anterior, genital bulb muscular, surrounded by glandular cells, armed with genital crown bearing eight genital spines (Fig. 5d).

Ovary elongated, not lobed, positioned posterior to midbody, length four times greater than width,10% of body length. Oviduct 411 long, 22–48 (30 7; 1) wide. Uterus massive and narrow, occupying most of the space between intestinal caeca, tubiform, serpentines between oötype and genital bulb. Eggs operculated. Holotype released 171 eggs with only 11 remaining in utero. Some eggs contain fully developed oncomiracidia. Mehlis’ gland distinct. Two parallel vaginae 262‒235 long, 102 wide, situated on lateral margins, bearing multiple marginal openings. Vaginal vestibule cup-shaped, 21% from anterior. Vitellaria dorsal to intestinal tract, extends throughout most of body and haptor, except areas occupied by female reproductive organs. Genito-intestinal canal prominent, 943 long, 10–46 (23 ± 9; 1) wide, situated directly posterior to ovary.

Neotenic parasite (Fig. 6‒7).

Measurements obtained from seven egg-producing neotenic parasites. Body pyriform (Fig. 6), dorsoventrally flat, ventrally concave, 1.419–3.307 (2.265 ± 667; 7) long. Maximum width 904–1.376 (1121 ± 368; 3). Body length 2–5 (3 ± 1; 6) times greater than width. Mouth 100–148 (124 ± 17; 5) in diameter, sub-ventral, surrounded by false oral sucker. Posterior haptor 313–526 (411 ± 89; 7) long, 541–1.166 (936 ± 305; 7) wide. Haptor length-body length ratio 0.13–0.24 (0.2 ± 0.04; 6), haptor bearing three pairs of haptoral suckers equal in size 103–226 (178 ± 32; 47). Hamuli absent. Marginal hooklets placed as for M. vencesi n. sp., pairs one 28.2 long (Fig. 7a), larger than pairs two to seven 22.6–27.7 (25.5 ± 1.5; 15), (Fig. 7b), pairs eight 27.5–35 (30.5 ± 3.155; 8) long (Fig. 7c). Medial pharynx length 199–312 (244 ± 45; 5) equal to width 207–312 (245 ± 41; 5), positioned immediately posterior or at the margin of false oral sucker. Intestine bifurcates at distance 27–30% (30% ± 2%; 3) from anterior, situated posterior to pharynx, converging posteriorly at 77–81% (80% ± 2.7%; 3) from anterior, stretching into area between haptoral suckers; no prehaptoral anastomosis. Intestine with lateral diverticula, length greater than width. Diverticula in posterior half longer than anterior. Medial diverticula only posterior to ovary, length greater than width, narrower than lateral diverticula.

Testis follicular, though only a small section was visible, positioned directly posterior to vitello-vaginal canal, ventral to intestine. Vas deferens not visible. Genital pore opening mid-ventral, posterior to intestinal ceca bifurcation, at distance 42–51% (46% ± 4%; 3) from anterior. Genital bulb diameter 31–51 (41 ± 9; 4), muscular, surrounded by glandular cells, armed with genital crown bearing eight to eleven genital spines 7.9–11.8 (9.8 ± 1; 10) long.

Ovary elongate, 256–580 (401 ± 120; 7) long, 67–117 (91 ± 19; 7) wide, not lobed, situated in middle of body, length three-six times greater than width, measuring 16–21% (17 ± 2.18%; 6) of body length. Oviduct 15 long, 6–28 (13 ± 6; 1) wide. Oötype 171–173 long, ovoid, containing a maximum of one ovoid, operculate egg 171–173 long, 132–142 wide. Uterus absent, eggs laid immediately after production. Mehlis’ gland distinct. Vaginae absent. Vitellaria dorsal to intestinal tract, extended throughout most of body, except area occupied by female reproductive organs. Genito-intestinal canal prominent, 257 long, 7–47 (18 ± 8; 1) wide, situated posterior to ovary.

3.1.3. Metapolystoma ansuanum n. sp. (Fig. 8‒9; Table 2)

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Ventral view of Metapolystoma ansuanum n. sp. holotype. Abbreviations: eg, egg; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito–intestinal canal; ha, hamuli; hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mg, Mehlis gland; mo, mouth; oc, oncomiracidium; od, oviduct; oi, oö–vitelline canal; oö, oötype; os, false oral sucker; ov, ovarium; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; sv, semen vesicle; te, testis; ut, uterus; va, vagina; vd, vas deferens; vi, vitelline; vv, vitello–vaginal canal.

3.1.3.1. Type host

Boophis luteus (Mantellidae).

3.1.3.2. Type locality

Cascade des Nymphes, Isalo National Park, Madagascar (Fig. 1), (22.46977S; 45.260701E).

3.1.3.3. Site in host

Urinary bladder.

3.1.3.4. Level of infection

One of nine frogs collected were infected with two mature parasites (prevalence 11.1%).

3.1.3.5. Type material

The morphological descriptions are based on two mature parasites (Holotype NMBP 569; Paratype NMBP 570) collected from the same locality in Cascade des Nymphes. The type material was deposited in the parasitic worm collection, National Museum, Aliwal Street, Bloemfontein 9301.

3.1.3.6. Zoobank registration

The Life Science Identifier (LSID) of the article is: 59F6A99A-C667-48 EB-9EA4-881D43956065. The LSID of the new name Metapolystoma ansuanum n. sp. Landman et al. is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4761BF6E-F309-4625-A7D7-CA64F3A3F6F8.

3.1.3.7. Etymology

This species is named for Mrs Anna-Susan van der Linde, known as Ansu, in acknowledgement of her teaching and inspiration of many secondary school pupils in the field of biology.

3.1.3.8. Description

Measurements reflected in Table 2. Body pyriform (Fig. 8), dorsoventrally flat, ventrally concave, widest section at position 16–65% from anterior end of body. Body length 2.6–2.8 times greater than width. Mouth sub-ventral, surrounded by false oral sucker. Posterior haptor measures 24% of total length, bearing three pairs of haptoral suckers of equal size. Well-developed hamuli positioned between posterior-most haptoral suckers with deep cut between handle and guard, hook length Z long relative to Length X (Fig. 9a). Marginal hooklets placed as for other polystomes: pairs one and two between hamuli, pairs three to five embedded in haptoral suckers, pairs six to eight positioned between anterior-most haptoral suckers (Fig. 9b). Medial pharynx length greater than width, positioned immediately posterior to or at margin of false oral sucker. Intestine bifurcates immediately posterior to pharynx at 15–18% from anterior, converging posteriorly at 79–81% from anterior; no prehaptoral anastomoses. Lateral intestinal diverticula length equal to width in anterior half, length greater than width in posterior half. Medial diverticula only posterior to ovary.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Metapolystoma ansuanum n. sp. from Boophis luteus. a, hamulus from holotype; b, marginal hooklets 2–7; c, genital crown from holotype.

Testis follicular, large, kidney-shaped, positioned posterior to ovary, ventral to intestine. Vas deferens widens anteriorly to form sinuous semen vesicle 17–31 (26 ± 4; 1) wide, 422 long, measuring 11% of body length, narrowing towards genital bulb, opening in common genital opening. Genital pore opening mid-ventral, posterior to intestinal ceca bifurcation at position 16–18% from anterior, genital bulb muscular, surrounded by glandular cells, armed with genital crown bearing 10 genital spines (Fig. 9c).

Ovary, elongate, not lobed, positioned posterior to midbody, length 2.3–2.7 times greater than width, measuring 9–10% of body length. Oviduct 345 long, 19–39 (28 ± 6; 1) wide. Uterus large, occupying one-third of body proper, tubiform, convolute. Uterus contains 41 ovoid, operculate eggs, some contain fully developed oncomiracidia. Intrauterine oncomiracidia present. Mehlis’ gland distinct. Two parallel vaginae, each 94–132 long (119 ± 18; 4), 66–81 (75 ± 8; 4) wide, found on lateral margins, bearing multiple marginal openings; vaginal vestibule cup-shaped at 21–26% from anterior. Vitellaria dorsal to intestinal tract, extending throughout most of body, except area occupied by female reproductive organs. Genito-intestinal canal prominent, 264 long, 30–40 (37 ± 4; 1) wide, situated directly posterior to ovary.

3.1.4. Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. (Fig. 10‒11; Table 2)

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Ventral view of Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. holotype. Abbreviations: eg, egg; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito–intestinal canal; ha, hamuli; hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mg, Mehlis gland; mo, mouth; oc, oncomiracidium; od, oviduct; oi, oö–vitelline canal; oö, oötype; os, false oral sucker; ov, ovarium; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; sv, semen vesicle; te, testis; ut, uterus; va, vagina; vc, vaginal canal; vd, vas deferens; vi, vitelline; vl, vitelline duct; vv, vitello–vaginal canal.

3.1.4.1. Type host

Boophis madagascariensis (Mantellidae).

3.1.4.2. Type locality

Indri Reserve in Andasibe, Madagascar (Fig. 1), (18.930856S; 48.413611E).

3.1.4.3. Site in host

Urinary bladder.

3.1.4.4. Level of infection

Three of 30 frogs collected were infected with a total of one mature and 71 juvenile parasites, while as many as 40 parasites were infecting a single host (prevalence of 10%, mean intensity 24).

3.1.4.5. Type material

The morphological descriptions are based on one mature and 27 juvenile parasites. One sexually mature specimen (Holotype 573) and four immature ones (Paratypes 574–577), all from the type locality, were deposited in the parasitic worm collection, National Museum, Aliwal Street, Bloemfontein 9301.

3.1.4.6. Voucher material

Remaining specimens in polystome collection, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

3.1.4.7. Zoobank registration

The Life Science Identifier (LSID) of the article is: 59F6A99A-C667-48 EB-9EA4-881D43956065. The LSID of the new name Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. Landman et al. is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:55203AE0-217D-45D0-B3C8-07DDE53FA9A3.

3.1.4.8. Etymology

This species is named in honour of emeritus Professor Pieter Daniel Theron at the North-West University, South Africa, in recognition of 54 years of inspiring teaching and dedication to the field of zoology.

3.1.4.9. Description

Measurements reflected in Table 2. Body pyriform (Fig. 10) dorsoventrally flat, widest section at 51% from anterior end, body length 2.6 times greater than width, mouth sub-ventral, surrounded by false oral sucker. Posterior haptor occupying 18% of total body length, bearing three pairs of haptoral suckers, equal in size. Marginal hooklets placed as for other polystomes, pairs one and two between hamuli, pairs three to five embedded in suckers, pairs six to eight in area between anterior-most suckers, pairs one and eight larger than pairs two to seven (Fig. 11a). Well-developed hamuli positioned between posterior-most haptoral suckers with deep cut between handle and guard (Fig. 11b). Hamuli development presented in Fig. 11c. Medial pharynx length greater than width, positioned immediately posterior to or at margin of false oral sucker. Intestine bifurcates immediately posterior to pharynx at 10% from anterior, converging posteriorly at 80% from anterior; no prehaptoral anastomoses. Lateral intestinal diverticula in first three quarters length equal to width, in last quarter length greater than width. Medial diverticula only posterior to ovary, length greater than width.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. from Boophis madagascariensis. a, marginal hooklets 1 (top), 2–7 (middle) and 8 (bottom) from holotype and paratypes; b, hamuli from holotype; c, hamulus development; d, genital crown from holotype.

Testis follicular, u-shaped, mainly positioned posterior to the ovary with two lateral processes extending forward along the lateral line past the ovary up to one-third of the body proper, ventral to intestine. Vas deferens widens anteriorly to form sinuous semen vesicle 23–65 (46 ± 18; 1) wide, 122 long, measuring 1% of body length, narrowing towards genital bulb, opening in common genital opening. Genital pore opening mid-ventral, posterior to intestinal ceca bifurcation, positioned 13% from anterior, genital bulb muscular, surrounded by glandular cells, armed with genital crown bearing seven genital spines (Fig. 11d).

Ovary elongate, not lobed, positioned posterior to midbody, length 1.2 times greater than width, measuring 5% of body length. Oviduct 1167 long, 20–51 (33 ± 9; 1) wide. Uterus massive, occupying 50% of body proper, tubiform, serpentines between posterior connection at oötype and anterior connection at genital bulb, containing 176 ovoid, operculate eggs, some contain fully developed oncomiracidia. Hatched intrauterine oncomiracidia present. Mehlis’ gland distinct. Two parallel vaginae 270–304 long, 132–177 wide, on lateral margins, with multiple marginal openings, vaginal vestibule cup-shaped at 18% from anterior. Vitellaria dorsal to intestinal tract, extended throughout most of body and haptor, except areas occupied by female reproductive organs. Genito-intestinal canal prominent 457 long, 30–77 (52 ± 16; 1) wide, situated posterior to ovary.

3.1.5. Metapolystoma multiova n. sp. (Fig. 12‒13; Table 2)

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Ventral view of Metapolystoma multiova n. sp. holotype. Abbreviations: eg, egg; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito–intestinal canal; ha, hamuli; hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mo, mouth; oc, oncomiracidium; od, oviduct; os, false oral sucker; ov, ovarium; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; te, testis; va, vagina; vi, vitelline; vv, vitello–vaginal canal.

3.1.5.1. Type host

Boophis occidentalis (Mantellidae).

3.1.5.2. Type locality

Cascade des Nymphes, Isalo National Park, Madagascar (Fig. 1), (22.46977S; 45.260701E).

3.1.5.3. Site in host

Urinary bladder.

3.1.5.4. Level of infection

One of five frogs collected were infected with two adult parasites (prevalence 20%).

3.1.5.5. Type material

The morphological descriptions are based on two mature parasites. Two sexually mature specimens (Holotype 571, Paratype 572), both from the type locality, were deposited in the parasitic worm collection, National Museum, Aliwal Street, Bloemfontein 9301.

3.1.5.6. Zoobank registration

The Life Science Identifier (LSID) of the article is: 59F6A99A-C667-48 EB-9EA4-881D43956065. The LSID of the new name Metapolystoma multiova n. sp. Landman et al. is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6854087D-44B5–492B-9750-3647188F0F26.

3.1.5.7. Etymology

The species epithet is derived from Latin and related to the vast number of eggs (±500) carried by this species in contrast with other currently known species in the genus (multi = many + ova = eggs).

3.1.5.8. Description

Measurements reflected in Table 2. Body pyriform (Fig. 12), dorsoventrally flat, ventrally concave, widest section at 50–57% from anterior end of body. Body length 2.2–2.3 times greater than width. Mouth directed sub-ventrally, surrounded by false oral sucker. Posterior haptor measures 18% of total length bearing three pairs of haptoral suckers of equal size. Marginal hooklet pairs six to eight situated between anterior-most haptoral suckers, pairs one and eight larger than pairs two to seven, pairs one and two between hamuli, pairs three to five embedded in suckers (Fig. 13a). Well-developed hamuli situated between posterior-most haptoral suckers with deep cut between handle and guard (Fig. 13b). Medial pharynx length greater than width, positioned immediately posterior to or at the margin of false oral sucker. Intestine bifurcates immediately posterior to pharynx at 13% from anterior, converging posteriorly at 79–85% from anterior; no prehaptoral anastomoses. Lateral intestinal diverticula situated in first third of intestine, where length is equal to width, absent in the second third while length is greater than width in the posterior third. Medial diverticula only posterior to ovary, length greater than width.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Metapolystoma multiova n. sp. from Boophis occidentalis. a, marginal hooklets 1 (top), 2–7 (middle) and 8 (bottom) from holotype and paratypes; b, hamuli from holotype (left) and from paratype (right); c, genital crown from holotype.

Testis follicular, sickle-shaped, posterior to ovary, ventral to intestine. Vas deferens obscured. Genital pore opening mid-ventrally situated on anterior margin of intestinal ceca bifurcation at 4% from anterior, genital bulb muscular, armed with genital crown bearing six genital spines (Fig. 13c).

Ovary elongate, not lobed, positioned posterior to midbody, length 2.8 times greater than width, measuring 8% of body length. Oviduct 988 long, 20–48 (31 ± 9; 1) wide. Uterus contains 336–499 ovoid, operculate eggs, some contain fully developed oncomiracidia, some hatched intrauterine oncomiracidia present. Mehlis’ gland obscured. Two parallel vaginae, each 266–311 long, 58–62 wide, situated on lateral margins bearing multiple marginal openings. Vaginal vestibule cup-shaped, situated at 18% from anterior. Vitellaria dorsal to intestinal tract, extended throughout most of body and haptor, except areas occupied by female reproductive organs. Genito-intestinal cannel prominent 633 long, 7–103 (24 ± 24; 1) wide, situated at level of ovary.

3.2. Genetic divergences between Metapolystoma species and parasite phylogeny

Some of the 18S, 28S and COI sequences used in this study were retrieved from GenBank, while the others were obtained and submitted under accession numbers MW053457, MW053458 and MW054236 to MW054249 (Table 3). The final alignment, which had resulted in 3.977 characters, contained 19 taxa, among which 13 specimens of Metapolystoma and six specimens characterizing distinct species of Polystoma.

Table 3.

Polystome species investigated, host species, locality and GenBank accession numbers for 18S, 28S and COI.

Polystome species Host species Locality 18S Accession number 28S Accession number COI Accession number
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Ambatolampy FM897287a FM897270a FM897300a
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Ambatolampy MW054243g JN800281b MW053457g
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Ankarafantsika MW054242g MW054236g JN800285b
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Makira MW054246g MW054239g JN800288b
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Makira MW054247g MW054240g JN800289b
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Ranomafana MW054245g MW054238g JN800286b
Metapolystoma brygoonis Ptychadena mascareniensis Madagascar: Vohiparara MW054244g MW054237g JN800287b
Metapolystoma cachani Ptychadena longirostris Africa: Nigeria FM897280a FM897262a JN800294b
Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. Boophis doulioti Madagascar: Ankarafantsika MW054248g JN800283b JN800291b
Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. Boophis doulioti Madagascar: Ankarafantsika FM897286a FM897269a MW053458g
Metapolystoma multiova n. sp. Boophis occidentalis Madagascar: Isalo FM897285a FM897268a FM897301a
Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. Boophis madagascareniensis Madagascar: Andasibe FM897284a FM897267a FM897298a
Metapolystoma theroni n. sp. Boophis madagascareniensis Madagascar: Andasibe MW054249g MW054241g JN800293b
Polystoma claudecombesi Amietia delalandii South Africa FM897281a FM897263a (−)
Polystoma dawiekoki Ptychadena anchietae South Africa AM051069c AM157204d AM913856e
Polystoma integerrimum Rana temporaria France AM051071c AM157206d JF699306f
Polystoma marmorati Hyperolius marmoratus South Africa AM051073c AM157208d AM913859e
Polystoma occipitalis Hemisus marmoratus Ivory Coast AM051075c FM897264a (−)
Polystoma testimagna Strongylopus fasciatus South Africa AM157194c AM157217d AM913860e
b

From Berthier and Verneau, unpublished.

g

Sequences reported in the present study; (−) Not available.

Minimum and maximum distances with standard deviation as estimated among Metapolystoma species were as follows. M. falcatum n. sp. (18S: 0.051% ± 0.0003–0.051 ± 0.0005%; 28S: 0.42% ± 0.001–1.42% ± 0.002; COI: 8.6% ± 0.016–15.68% ± 0.023); M. multiova n. sp. (18S: 0–0.1% ± 0.0007); 28S: 0.28% ± 0.001–1.64% ± 0.003; COI: 12.54% ± 0.020–13.78% ± 0.022); M. theroni n. sp. (18S: 0–0.1% ± 0.0007; 28S: 0.28% ± 0.001–1.93% ± 0.003; COI: 11.4% ± 0.019–15.68% ± 0.023). With regard to 18S, total differences between species showed no character difference between M. multiova n. sp. and M. theroni n. sp. while the total 18S differences among all other Metapolystoma spp. ranged from 1 to 2 (Table 4). Regarding total 28S differences (Table 5), values ranged from 4 to 27 among all Metapolystoma spp., while the lowest value occurred between M. multiova n. sp. and M. theroni n. sp. Finally, regarding total COI differences (Table 6), values ranged from 25 to 45 between all Metapolystoma spp. Though no 18S character difference was detected between M. multiova n. sp. and M. theroni n. sp., the high levels of genetic divergence between M. falcatum n. sp., M. multiova n. sp., M. theroni n. sp., M. brygoonis and M. cachani (as estimated on the basis of 28S and COI sequences) led us to consider three new Metapolystoma species.

Table 4.

Mean genetic distances (below diagonal) and total character differences (above diagonal) between species groups as inferred from comparisons of 18S rDNA sequences (1931 characters).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 M. brygoonis 1 2 2 2 11 10 13 10 9 25
2 M. falcatum n. sp. (B. d.) 0,001 1 1 1 10 9 12 9 8 24
3 M. multiova n. sp. (B. o.) 0,001 0001 0 2 11 10 13 10 9 25
4 M. theroni n. sp. (B. m) 0,001 0001 0,000 2 11 10 13 10 9 25
5 M. cachani 0,001 0001 0,001 0001 9 8 11 10 9 23
6 P. occipitalis 0,006 0005 0,006 0006 0,005 6 16 15 14 28
7 P. dawiekoki 0,005 0005 0,005 0005 0,004 0003 16 15 14 28
8 P. claudecombesi 0,007 0006 0,007 0007 0,006 0008 0,008 11 10 24
9 P. marmorati 0,005 0005 0,005 0005 0,005 0008 0,008 0006 1 25
10 P. testimagna 0,005 0004 0,005 0005 0,005 0007 0,007 0005 0,001 24
11 P. integerrimum 0,013 0013 0,013 0013 0,012 0015 0,015 0013 0,013 0,0126

Abbreviations: B. d. = Boophis doulioti; B. o. = Boophis occidentalis; B. m. = Boophis madagascariensis

Table 5.

Mean genetic distances (below diagonal) and total character differences (above diagonal) between species groups as inferred from comparisons of 28S rDNA sequences (1418 characters).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 M. brygoonis (SlA) 2 8 13 15 20 29 29 37 38 37 58
2 M. brygoonis (SlB) 0,001 6 11 13 18 27 27 35 36 35 59
3 M. falcatum n. sp. (B. d.) 0,006 0004 11 13 20 26 26 34 35 34 56
4 M. multiova n. sp. (B. o.) 0,009 0008 0,008 4 23 32 32 40 39 38 62
5 M. theroni n. sp. (B. m.) 0,011 0009 0,009 0003 27 34 34 40 39 38 62
6 M. cachani 0,014 0013 0,014 0016 0,019 32 33 41 42 41 68
7 P. occipitalis 0,020 0019 0,019 0023 0,024 0023 7 36 38 35 59
8 P. dawiekoki 0,021 0019 0,019 0023 0,024 0024 0,005 35 35 32 59
9 P. claudecombesi 0,027 0025 0,024 0,09 0,029 0030 0,026 0025 22 23 53
10 P. marmorati 0,027 0026 0,025 0028 0,028 0030 0,027 0025 0,016 5 53
11 P. testimagna 0,027 0025 0,024 0027 0,027 0030 0,025 0022 0,016 0004 52
12 P. integerrimum 0,042 0043 0,041 0045 0,045 0050 0,043 0043 0,039 0039 0,038

Abbreviations: SlA = sublineage A; SlB = sublineage B; B. d. = Boophis doulioti; B. o. = Boophis occidentalis; B. m. = Boophis madagascariensis.

Table 6.

Mean genetic distances (below diagonal) and total character differences (above diagonal) between specimens of Metapolystoma species as inferred from comparisons of COI sequences (323 characters).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 M. brygoonis (Ankarafantsika) 1 2 21 21 13 17 27 27 40 39 41 26 36 35 38 55
2 M. brygoonis (Ambatolampy) 0,003 3 20 20 12 16 26 26 39 38 40 25 35 34 37 55
3 M. brygoonis (Ambatolampy) 0,006 0009 21 21 13 17 26 26 39 39 41 28 36 35 38 56
4 M. brygoonis (Vohiparara)} 0,068 0065 0,068 1 13 11 30 30 38 37 39 30 43 40 41 58
5 M. brygoonis (Ranomafana) 0,068 0065 0,068 0003 13 12 30 30 38 36 39 29 43 40 41 57
6 M. brygoonis (Makira) 0,041 0038 0,041 0042 0,042 8 25 25 37 34 36 22 35 32 36 54
7 M. brygoonis (Makira) 0,055 0051 0,055 0035 0,038 0025 30 30 38 36 38 29 40 37 40 55
8 M. falcatum n. sp. (B. d.) 0,089 0086 0,086 0100 0,099 0082 0,100 0 38 43 45 32 38 33 37 60
9 M. falcatum n. sp. (B. d.) 0,089 0086 0,086 0100 0,099 0082 0,100 0000 38 43 45 32 38 33 37 60
10 M. multiova n. sp. (B. o.) 0,137 0133 0,133 0129 0,129 0125 0,129 0129 0,129 40 38 40 49 37 42 61
11 M. theroni n. sp. (B. m.) 0,133 0129 0,133 0125 0,121 0114 0,121 0149 0,149 0138 4 36 48 41 45 64
12 M. theroni n. sp. (B. m.) 0,141 0137 0,141 0132 0,133 0121 0,129 0157 0,157 0130 0,013 40 50 41 46 65
13 M. cachani 0,085 0082 0,092 0099 0,096 0071 0,096 0106 0,106 0136 0,121 0136 35 31 34 51
14 P. dawiekoki 0,121 0117 0,121 0147 0,147 0117 0,135 0128 0,128 0170 0,166 0174 0,117 38 42 57
15 P. marmorati 0,117 0114 0,117 0136 0,135 0106 0,124 0110 0,110 0125 0,139 0139 0,103 0129 25 54
16 P. testimagna 0,128 0124 0,128 0139 0,139 0121 0,135 0124 0,124 0143 0,155 0158 0,113 0143 0,082 53
17 P. integerrimum 0,193 0193 0,198 0205 0,201 0189 0,193 0214 0,214 0218 0,231 0235 0,177 0202 0,189 0185

Abbreviations: B. d. = Boophis doulioti; B. o. = Boophis occidentalis; B. m. = Boophis madagascariensis

When 18S, 28S and COI sequences were combined for Bayesian analysis (Fig. 14), M. cachani appears as the most basal species within Metapolystoma and Malagasy Metapolystoma form a clade. Within this clade, M. multiova n. sp. and M. theroni n. sp. are sister species; two sublineages are well differentiated within M. brygoonis. Sublineage A comprises polystomes found in localities at Makira, Ranomafana and Vohiparara (Fig. 1), while sublineage B comprises polystomes of the Ambatolampy and Ankarafantsika areas (Fig. 1). Because high levels of 28S and COI genetic divergence (Table 5, Table 6) were also observed these two sublineages (28S: 0.14% ± 0.0009; COI: 5.71% ± 0.011), it suggests that there could be two genetic entities within M. brygoonis infecting the same host species in Madagascar, that is, Ptychadena mascareniensis.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Bayesian tree inferred from the analysis of concatenated 18S, 28S and COI gene sequences. Node values indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities.

3.3. Remarks

The phylogenetic position of M. falcatum n. sp., M. multiova n. sp. and M. theroni n. sp. within the Polystomatidae (Fig. 14) confirms that they are members of Metapolystoma (Polystomatidae). Genetic divergence estimates among Metapolystoma taxa (Table 4, Table 5, Table 6) sustain morphological descriptions, for these three species.

The lengths of M. vencesi n. sp. (9190) and M. theroni n. sp. (9086) differ from all other Malagasy metapolystomes, which vary in length from 2680 to 6710. M. theroni n. sp. has a haptor length of 1,634, separating it from all other known Malagasy metapolystomes. Haptor length of M.falcatum n. sp. (1492) and M. vencesi n. sp. (1437) overlap but differ substantially from M. ansuanum n. sp. (669–912), M. brygoonis (760–1070) and M. multiova n. sp. (916). Haptor length-body length ratio of M. vencesi n. sp. (0.16) separates it from all other species while, in the overlapping cases of M. falcatum n. sp. (0.19), M. multiova n. sp. (0.18) and M. theroni n. sp. (0.18), there is a marked difference from M. ansuanum n. sp. (0.23–0.25) and M. brygoonis (0.22–0.23), the latter two of which overlap in turn.

With a hamulus length X (Fig. 3b) of 269–332, M. vencesi n. sp. differs from all other known Malagasy metapolystomes, which range in length between 196 and 420. It is also the single species that has no separation between the hamulus handle and guard. Metapolystoma brygoonis (330–420), M. falcatum n. sp. (393–407) and M. theroni n. sp. (392–408) overlap but differ from M. ansuanum n. sp. (205) and M. multiova n. sp. (196–248), while the latter two also overlap. Hamulus hook length Z (Fig. 3b) separates all newly described metapolystomes from one another, ranging from M. vencesi n. sp. (40–52) with the smallest hooks to M. falcatum n. sp. (66–70) with the largest. Besides M. ansuanum n. sp. differs from all other metapolystomes in that it has an exceptional long hamulus hook relative to the rest of the hamulus and M. falcatum n. sp. differs from all others in that it has an exceptional long curved marginal hooklet tip on hooks two to seven.

With a genital bulb diameter of 115, M. vencesi n. sp. has the largest diameter ranging between 64 and 86. Metapolystoma. brygoonis (80), M. falcatum n. sp. (86), and M. multiova n. sp. (86) overlap but are separated from M. ansuanum n. sp. (64–73) and M. theroni n. sp. (65), while the latter two overlap. Metapolystoma falcatum n. sp. (26), M. multiova n. sp. (25), and M. theroni n. sp. (24–28) overlap in genital crown diameter but are separated from M. ansuanum n. sp. (29–33) and M. vencesi n. sp. (32), while the latter two overlap. Metapolystoma brygoonis, M. falcatum n. sp. and M. vencesi n. sp. all bear eight genital spines and differ from M. ansuanum n. sp., M. multiova n. sp. and M. theroni n. sp. that respectively bear ten, six and seven genital spines. With the greatest genital spine length of 40.4–43.7 M. multiova n. sp. is separated from all other known Malagasy metapolystomes, except M. brygoonis, which ranges between 24.3 and 34.9.

Metapolystoma brygoonis (410–460), M. multiova n. sp. (446) and M. theroni n. sp. (479) overlap in ovary length but differ from M. ansuanum n. sp. (265–338), M. falcatum n. sp. (772) and M. vencesi n. sp. (861), the latter which also differ from one another. With the greatest egg length of 239–265, M. theroni n. sp. differs from all other Malagasy metapolystomes, which range from 160 to 230. Metapolystoma ansuanum (196–217), M. multiova n. sp. (198–228), and M. vencesi n. sp. (210–230) overlap but differ from M. brygoonis (160–200) and M. falcatum n. sp. (161–185), the latter two which overlap.

To conclude, due to the small number of parasite specimens that were investigated, we can not exclude that the morphometric variability may represent intra specific variation. However, worms under investigation show a combination of morphological characters, namely shape of the hamulus handle and guard, shape of the hamulus hook, shape of the marginal hooklet tip on hooks and genital spine number that allow the differentiation of five distinct metapolystome species.

4. Discussion

Metapolystoma was until now reported only from the Afrotropical realm anuran hosts belonging to Ptychadena (Ptychadenidae). Ptychadena is a successful and widespread genus in Africa being a well-suited host for polystomes (Du Preez and Kok, 1992a). Of the 56 known Ptychadena species (Frost, 2020), 11 are known to host polystomes, including 14 Polystoma and three Metapolystoma species (see Du Preez and Kok, 1992a). According to Verneau et al. (2009), Metapolystoma may have originated in Africa within the time window 19.8–4.3 million years ago (Mya) from ancestors close to Polystoma and further dispersed to Madagascar following natural transoceanic dispersal of the ancestor of Pt. mascareniensis at about 14.2–2.3 Mya (Verneau et al., 2009). Because M. brygoonis forms a sister group to all other members of Malagasy Metapolystoma, M. cachani being basal within Metapolystoma, a host switch was suggested from the ancestor of Pt. mascareniensis to ancestral Boophis (Mantellidae) (Verneau et al., 2009), which is confirmed in the present phylogenetic study. Even though Ptychadena and Boophis are not phylogenetically closely related, they both display pleisiomorphic reproductive modes, favouring the possibility of an ancestral host switch in Madagascar (see Verneau et al., 2009), and ultimately the diversification of Metapolystoma within Boophis. While Boophis is not the single representative of the family Mantellidae infected by polystomes in Madagascar, mantellid frogs of the two genera Mantella and Blommersia which both exhibit a derived mode of reproduction, are infected by polystomes of another genus, i.e. Madapolystoma (see Verneau et al., 2009; Du Preez et al., 2010; Landman et al., 2018). In addition, Verneau et al. (2009) reported another undescribed species of Metapolystoma from Aglyptodactylus madagascariensis (Duméril, 1853). Therefore, the five new Metapolystoma species described along this study clearly indicate that a larger diversity of metapolystomes can be expected. This is especially true since Madagascar is inhabited by 79 Boophis species (Frost, 2020) that may serve as hosts for Metapolystoma species. Furthermore, M. brygoonis can be divided in two separate lineages according to genetic differentiation (Fig. 14). These results strengthen the fact that Metapolystoma in Madagascar still continue to diversify and call for further sampling and investigation.

The validity of Metapolystoma has long been disputed. It was suggested that the uterine structure was achieved convergently within Metapolystoma (Tinsley, 1974), through the ability of the parasite to adapt to the ecology of its host (Kok and Seaman, 1987; Murith, 1981; Tinsley, 1983). Bentz et al., (2001) claimed it to be invalid and ascribed its morphological differences from Polystoma in terms of homoplastic characters. Nevertheless our phylogeny supports the monophyly of Metapolystoma, which is however nested within the paraphyletic Polystoma. If the morphological differences between Metapolystoma and Polystoma were the product of reproductive plasticity, Metapolystoma spp. would not have clustered together on a molecular level (see Fig. 14). The fact that they do, therefore, suggests that the long uterus may have been inherited by descent. It is however intriguing to note that two polystome species M. porosissimae and P. sodwanensis, which display completely different life-history strategies, can occur simultaneously in the same host species, i.e. P. porosissima in Africa (Du Preez and Kok, 1992b). Metapolystoma porosissimae displays a strategy where many eggs are stored in a large uterus, which is typical of polystomes that infest hosts within arid environments (Du Preez, 2015; Du Preez and Kok, 1992b). Conversely, P. sodwanensis has a small uterus containing only a few eggs, which is in line with a water-dependent host (Du Preez and Kok, 1992b). Even though morphological differences between the two species are distinct, the simultaneous occurrence of these two species in the same individuals of Pt. porosissima have reinforced the dispute (Du Preez and Kok, 1992b). Though the validity of Metapolystoma at this stage cannot be ruled out, a more in depth genetic investigation of the two African polystome species M. porosissimae and P. sodwanensis should help to conclude.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the colleagues, assistants and students who assisted in field work, in particular to Miguel Vences, Che Weldon and various Malagasy students. Research was conducted in a collaborative effort between the North-West University, the Association Nationale pour la Gestion des Aires Protégées and the Département de Biologie Animale de l’Université d’Antananarivo. We are grateful to the Malagasy authorities who provided the necessary research and export permits. We are also grateful to Annemarie Ohler at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris who allowed us to dissect several museum specimens for additional parasite material. Funding was provided by the Volkswagen Foundation , Grant number: VE247/2-1, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the CNRS.

References

  1. Andreone F., Carpenter A.I., Cox N., Du Preez L., Freeman K., Furrer S., Garcia G., Glaw F., Glos J., Knox D., Köhler J., Mendelson J.R., III, Mercurio V., Mittermeier R.A., Moore R.D., Rabibisoa N.H.C., Randriamahazo H., Randrianasolo H., Raminosoa N.R., Ramilijaona O.R. The challenge of conserving amphibian megadiversity in Madagascar. PLoS Biol. 2008;e118 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badets M., Verneau O. Origin and evolution of alternative developmental strategies in amphibious sarcopterygian parasites (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) Org. Divers. Evol. 2009;9:155–164. [Google Scholar]
  3. Badets M., Whittington I., Lalubin F., Allienne J.F., Maspimby J.L., Bentz S., Du Preez L.H., Barton D., Hasegawa H., Tandon V., Imkongwapang R., Ohler A., Combes C., Verneau O. Correlating early evolution of parasitic platyhelminths to Gondwana breakup. Syst. Biol. 2011;60(6):762–781. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentz S., Leroy S., Du Preez L., Mariaux J., Vaucher C., Verneau O. Origin and evolution of African Polystoma (Monogenea: polystomatidae) assessed by molecular methods. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001;31:697–705. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bentz S., Sinnappah-Kang N.D., Lim L., Lebedev B., Combes C., Verneau O. Historical biogeography of amphibian parasites, genus Polystoma (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) J. Biogeogr. 2006;33(4):742–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01402.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berthier P. University of Perpignan; France: 2011. Conservation animale: Utilisation des parasites comme marqueurs de l’écologie évolutive des amphibiens; pp. 1–185. [Google Scholar]
  7. Combes C. World biogeography of polystomatid monogeneans. Acad. Sci. Proc. 1976;34:55–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Du Preez L.H. Eupolystoma namibiensis n. sp. (Monogenea: polystomatidae) parasitic in Poyntonophrynus hoeschi (Ahl, 1934) of Namibia. Afr. Zool. 2015;50:141–145. [Google Scholar]
  9. Du Preez L.H., Kok D.J. Syntopic occurrence of new species of Polystoma and metapolystoma (Monogenea: polystomatidae) in Ptychadena porosissima in South Africa. Syst. Parasitol. 1992;22:141–150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Preez L.H., Kok D.J. The frog genus Ptychadena as host for polystomatid (Monogenea) parasites in Africa. Afr. J. Herpetol. 1992;40:47–49. [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Preez L.H., Raharivololoniaina L., Verneau O., Vences M. A new genus of polystomatid parasitic flatworm (Monogenea: polystomatidae) without free-swimming life stage from the Malagasy poison frogs. Zootaxa. 2010;2722:54–68. [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Preez L.H., Verneau O., Gross T.S. Polystoma floridana n. sp.(Monogenea: Polystomatidae) a parasite in the green tree frog, Hyla cinerea (Schneider), of North America. Zootaxa. 2007;1663(1):33–45. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.179988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Euzet L., Combes C. Sur un polystomatidae (Monogenea) recolté à Madagascar chez Rana mascareniensis Duméril et Bribon. Bul. Soc. Zool. 1964:392–401. [Google Scholar]
  14. Frost D.R. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. American Museum of Natural History; New York, USA: 2020. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html Version 6 (10 April 2020). Electronic database accessible at. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallien L. Deux espèces nouvelles de polystomes africains. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 1956;81:369–374. [Google Scholar]
  16. Glaw F., Vences M. A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar. third ed. Köln, Vences and Glaw; 2007. pp. 146–178. [Google Scholar]
  17. Heritier L., Badets M., Du Preez L.H., Aisien M.S., Lixian F., Combes C., Verneau O. Evolutionary processes involved in the diversification of chelonian and mammal polystomatid parasites (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) revealed by palaeoecology of their hosts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015;92:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. Mrbayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformation. 2001;17:754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. IUCN International union for conservation of nature and natural resources. 2016. Date of access: Downloaded on 09 April 2020. [DOI]
  20. IUCN International union for conservation of nature and natural resources. 2016. Date of access: Downloaded on 09 April 2020. [DOI]
  21. IUCN International union for conservation of nature and natural resources. 2016. Date of access: Downloaded on 09 April 2020. [DOI]
  22. IUCN International union for conservation of nature and natural resources. 2016. Date of access: Downloaded on 09 April 2020. [DOI]
  23. IUCN International union for conservation of nature and natural resources. 2016. Date of access: Downloaded on 09 April 2020. [DOI]
  24. Junker K., Lhermitte-Vallarino N., Barbuto M., Ineich I., Wanji S., Bain O. New species of Rhabdias (Nematoda: rhabdiasidae) from afrotropical anurans, including molecular evidence and notes on biology. Folia Parasitol. 2010;57:47–61. doi: 10.14411/fp.2010.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kok D.J., Seaman M.T. Polystomatidae (Monogenea) parasitic in the anuran genus Natalobatrachus in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Zool. 1987;22:258–263. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kulo S.D. Présence au Togo de Metapolystoma cachani (Gallien, 1957). Combes, 1976 (Monogenea) chez l’amphibien Ptychadena longirostris (Peters, 1870) Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 1981;105:177–181. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuzmin Y., Junker K., Du Preez L., Bain O. A new species of Rhabdias Stiles et Hassall, 1905 (Nematoda: rhabdiasidae) from Blommersia domerguei (Guibe) (Amphibia: Mantellidae) in Madagascar. Folia Parasitol. 2013;60:469–474. doi: 10.14411/fp.2013.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Landman W.J., Verneau O., Du Preez L.H. First record of viviparity in polystomatid flatworms (Monogenea: polystomatidae) with the description of two new species of Madapolystoma from the Madagascan anuran hosts Blommersia domerguei and Mantella expectata. Int. J. Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2018;7:343–354. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Littlewood D.T.J., Rohde K., Clough K.A. Parasite speciation within or between host species? Phylogenetic evidence from site-specific polystome monogeneans. Int. J. Parasitol. 1997;27:1289–1297. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(97)00086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Murith D. Contribution à l'étude de la systématique des polystomes (Monogènes, Polystomatidae) parasites d'amphibiens anoures de basse Côte-d'Ivoire. Rev. Suisse Zool. 1981;88:475–533. [Google Scholar]
  33. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Olson P.D., Tkach V.V. Advances and trends in the molecular systematics of the parasitic Platyhelminthes. Adv. Parasitol. 2005;60:165–243. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)60003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Page R.D. Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1996;12:357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformation. 1998;14:817–818. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Raharivololoniaina L., Verneau O., Berthier P., Vences M., Du Preez L.H. First monogenean flatworm from a microhylid frog host: Kankana, a new polystome genus from Madagascar. Parasitol. Int. 2011;60(4):465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rocha R., Borda E., Andreone F., Rosa G.M. First reports of leech parasitism in Malagasy Anurans. Comp. Parasitol. 2012;79:352–356. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sinnappah N.D., Lim L.H., Rohde K., Tinsley R., Combes C., Verneau O. A paedomorphic parasite associated with a neotenic amphibian host: phylogenetic evidence suggests a revised systematic position for Sphyranuridae within anuran and turtle polystomatoineans. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001;18:189–201. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tinsley R.C. Observations on Polystoma africanum Szidat with a review of the inter–relationships of Polystoma species in Africa. J. Nat. Hist. 1974;8:355–367. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tinsley R.C. Ovoviviparity in platyhelminth life-cycles. Parasitology. 1983;86:161–196. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000050885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Verneau O., Bentz S., Sinnappah N.D., Du Preez L.H., Whittington I., Combes C. A view of early vertebrate evolution inferred from the phylogeny of polystome parasites (Monogenea: polystomatidae) Proc. Biol. Sci. 2002;269:535–543. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Verneau O., Du Preez L.H., Laurent V., Raharivololoniaina L., Glaw F., Vences M. The double odyssey of Madagascan polystome flatworms leads to new insights on the origins of their amphibian hosts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009;276:1575–1583. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wohltmann A., Du Preez L., Rodel M.-O., Kohler J., Vences M. Endoparasitic mites of the genus Endotrombicula ewing, 1931 (Acari: Prostigmata: Parasitengona: trombiculidae) from African and madagascan anurans, with description of a new species. Folia Parasitol. 2007;54:225–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES