Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Apr 20;47:187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.019

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of emergency department services for the treatment of injuries

Katherine J Harmon a,, Mike Dolan Fliss b,d, Stephen W Marshall b, Kathy Peticolas c,d, Scott K Proescholdbell d, Anna E Waller b,c
PMCID: PMC8056481  PMID: 33892334

Abstract

Context

The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on the utilization of healthcare services; however, the impact on population-level emergency department (ED) utilization patterns for the treatment of acute injuries has not been fully characterized.

Objective

This study examined the frequency of North Carolina (NC) EDs visits for selected injury mechanisms during the first eleven months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Data were obtained from the NC Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT), NC's legislatively mandated statewide syndromic surveillance system for the years 2019 and 2020. Frequencies of January – November 2020 NC ED visits were compared to frequencies of 2019 visits for selected injury mechanisms, classified according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) injury diagnosis and mechanism codes.

Results

In 2020, the total number of injury-related visits declined by 19.5% (N = 651,158) as compared to 2019 (N = 809,095). Visits related to motor vehicle traffic crashes declined by a greater percentage (29%) and falls (19%) declined by a comparable percentage to total injury-related visits. Visits related to assault (15%) and self-harm (10%) declined by smaller percentages. Medication/drug overdose visits increased (10%), the only injury mechanism studied to increase during this period.

Conclusion

Both ED avoidance and decreased exposures may have contributed to these declines, creating implications for injury morbidity and mortality. Injury outcomes exacerbated by the pandemic should be addressed by timely public health responses.

Keywords: COVID-19, Injury, Sentinel surveillance, Emergency medicine

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; ICD-10-CM, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification; MVT, motor vehicle – traffic; NC, North Carolina; NC DETECT, North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool; OD, overdose; Q, quarter; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; US, United States

1. Introduction

On January 8, 2020, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention officially announced that a novel coronavirus, later named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was the causative agent of a pneumonia of unknown etiology (COVID-19) that had been spreading in China since December 2019 [1,2]. As of November 23, 2020, COVID-19 had spread from China to 221 countries, resulting in over 58 million confirmed cases and 1.4 million deaths [3].

The United States (US) had its first confirmed case of COVID-19 on January 29, 2020 [4]. As of November 23, 2020, the US had confirmed over 12 million cases and 255,000 fatalities, with all 50 States and the District of Columbia reporting cases and fatalities [5].

To reduce disease transmission and the burden on the US healthcare system, federal, state, and local social/physical distancing measures (i.e., “stay-at-home” orders) were implemented across the nation. These measures limited gathering sizes, closed schools and nonessential businesses, and encouraged residents to stay-at-home [6]. Evidence suggests that these measures, even heterogeneously implemented, reduced COVID-19 transmission [7].

The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread direct effects on health and well-being of communities and indirect effects on policy, economics, and society. The impact on injury incidence and healthcare utilization has not been well-described at the population-level for a variety of unintentional and intentional injury mechanisms. We have used near-real time North Carolina (NC) emergency department (ED) visit data to enumerate injury-related ED visits during the 2020 pandemic and to compare the frequency of these ED visits to the corresponding period in 2019.

2. Methods

We collected aggregate ED visit data from the NC Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT), NC's statewide syndromic surveillance system. NC DETECT is legislatively mandated to collect data from all 24/7, acute care, hospital-affiliated, civilian EDs in the State. NC DETECT collects, harmonizes, cleans, monitors data quality, and implements standardized case definitions for surveillance use [8,9].

We obtained weekly counts of all ED visits from January to mid-November in 2019 and 2020 (12/30/2018–11/16/2019 and 12/29/2019–11/14/2020). In NC DETECT, all “weeks” start on a Sunday and end on a Saturday. We defined quarters by week numbers (1–13, 14–26, 27–39, and 40–52). Q4 data was only available through mid-November 2020 at time of publication, so the table comparisons constrain to that point for both years (see Table 1 footnote).

Table 1.

Comparison of North Carolina emergency department visits for selected injury mechanisms, by quarter, 2020 vs. 2019

Selected measure/ injury mechanism 2019
2020
Percent change %
N Weekly average N Weekly average
All ED visits 4,272,512 92,881 3,506,396 76,226 −17.9%
 Q1 1,179,038 90,695 1,146,352 88,181 −2.8%
 Q2 1,246,777 95,906 792,547 60,965 −36.4%
 Q3 1,197,224 92,094 1,015,472 78,113 −15.2%
 Q4a 649,473 92,782 552,025 78,861 −15.0%
Injury-related ED visits 809,095 17,589 651,158 14,156 −19.5%
 Q1 190,127 14,625 181,383 13,953 −4.6%
 Q2 245,215 18,863 160,307 12,331 −34.6%
 Q3 247,168 19,013 204,599 15,738 −17.2%
 Q4a 126,585 18,084 104,869 14,981 −17.2%
Falls 193,572 4208 157,180 3417 −18.8%
 Q1 49,762 3828 45,911 3532 −7.7%
 Q2 57,270 4405 38,717 2978 −32.4%
 Q3 56,924 4379 47,262 3636 −17.0%
 Q4a 29,616 4231 25,290 3613 −14.6%
MVTs 74,101 1611 52,874 1149 −28.6%
 Q1 19,318 1486 16,291 1253 −15.7%
 Q2 22,308 1716 11,573 890 −48.1%
 Q3 20,704 1593 16,105 1239 −22.2%
 Q4a 11,771 1682 8905 1272 −24.3%
Medication/Drug ODs 13,454 292 14,762 321 9.7%
 Q1 3450 265 3469 267 0.6%
 Q2 4176 321 4430 341 6.1%
 Q3 3861 297 4601 354 19.2%
 Q4a 1967 281 2262 323 15.0%
Assault 24,805 539 21,053 458 −15.1%
 Q1 6054 466 5585 430 −7.7%
 Q2 7579 583 5598 431 −26.1%
 Q3 7466 574 6690 515 −10.4%
 Q4a 3706 529 3180 454 −14.2%
Self-harm/Suicide 10,626 231 9520 207 −10.4%
 Q1 2855 220 2682 206 −6.1%
 Q2 3167 244 2352 181 −25.7%
 Q3 2964 228 2888 222 −2.6%
 Q4a 1640 234 1598 228 −2.6%
a

Q4 is only through 11/16/2019 and 11/14/2020. Total ED visits in 2019 is also constrained to this same period for comparison to 2020 visits to date. Abbreviations: ED = emergency department; MVT = motor vehicle traffic; OD = overdose; Q = Quarter.

We examined the total number of ED visits and number of injury-related ED visits (presence of an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] injury diagnosis or mechanism code) using standard reporting functions available to authorized NC DETECT users. These case definitions are based on nationally standardized ICD-10-CM and keyword case definitions from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), and deep studies of the NC local context. The full list of the case definitions are available at https://ncdetect.org/case-definitions/ [8].

We report total and cause-specific injuries (based on ICD-10-CM injury mechanism codes), including falls, motor vehicle traffic crashes (MVTs), medication/drug overdoses, assaults, and self-harm/suicide events.

We calculated count and percent changes in ED visit counts from 2019 to 2020. We assessed statistical significance of select trend and baseline changes after March 3, 2020, the date of the first reported NC case, by a Poisson distributed generalized linear model. All analyses were completed in RStudio® [9].

3. Results

Fig. 1 displays the weekly number of NC ED visits from January to mid-November in 2019 and 2020, with COVID-like-illness (CLI) ED visits and key pandemic milestones as reference. Table 1 enumerates these changes to total and mechanism-specific ED visits by quarter. Fig. 2 displays weekly mechanism-specific ED visit counts against a LOESS smooth line to aid visual interpretation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Total number of weekly North Carolina emergency department (ED) visits vs. COVID-Like Illness ED visits, with key dates related to the spread and control of COVID-19 in the United States and North Carolina: January to mid-November 2019 & 2020. CLI visits are visually inflated by a factor of 10 on second axis for ease of interpretation.

Abbreviations: US = United States; NC = North Carolina; ED = emergency department; CLI = COVID-Like Illness; Jan = January; Feb = February; Mar = March; Apr = April; Jun = June; Jul = July; Aug = August; Sep = September; Oct = October; Nov = November; Dec = December.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Weekly North Carolina emergency department visits for selected leading causes of intentional and unintentional injuries: counts and LOESS smooth lines, January–November 2019 & 2020.

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; Jan = January; Feb = February; Mar = March; Apr = April; Jun = June; Jul = July; Aug = August; Sep = September; Oct = October; Nov = November; Dec = December.

The number of total NC ED visits in 2020 showed only a small reduction (−3%) compared to quarter 1 (January through March), moving from approximately 91,000 weekly visits in 2019 to 88,000 in 2020. That reduction began sharply in mid-March after the first NC case of COVID-19 was confirmed on March 3, 2020 [10]. A US National Emergency was declared soon after on March 13, 2020, followed by a NC Stay at Home order on March 30, 2020 [11,12]. Total ED visits dramatically declined in quarter 2, from approximately 96,000 weekly visits in 2019 to just 61,000 in 2020 (−36%). This decline in total ED visits rebounded some in Q3, from 92,000 weekly visits in 2020 to 78,000 in 2020 (−15%). At the time of publication in Q4 this reduction seems to be holding steady (−15%).

The total number of injury-related ED visit counts displayed a similar pattern to total ED visits counts, with declines of 5%, 35%, and 17% in quarters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was, however, considerable variation across injury intents and mechanisms.

Among unintentional injury mechanisms, falling-related NC ED visits displayed similar trends to total ED and injury-related ED visit counts. The percent decrease for the number of MVT-related NC ED visits far exceeded other injury intents and mechanisms, declining 16%, 48%, and 22% in quarters 1, 2, and 3. The decline in transportation injury-related ED visits was not universal across modes, e.g., NC bicycle crash-related ED visits increased by nearly 10% during the months of March–April 2020 vs 2019 (data not displayed). Contrasting other injury mechanisms, the number of monthly unintentional medication/drug overdose-related NC ED visits was unchanged in quarter 1 (+0.6%) and increased in quarter 2 (+6%) and quarter 3 (+19%). In quarter 3 this represented an additional 57 medication/drug overdose-related ED visits each week compared to 2019. A test for increased baseline found this post-COVID-19 increase statistically significant for medication/drug overdose (p < 0.0001) and increased trend during 2020 for all injury, falls, MVT, and self-harm / suicide (p < 0.0001).

For intentional injury mechanisms, assaults followed similar trends to total NC ED and injury-related ED visits. Conversely, ED visits related to self-harm/suicide did not experience as substantial a decline as most other injury mechanisms in quarter 2 (−26% for self-harm vs. −35% for all injury-related ED visits) and has nearly recovered to 2019 levels in quarter 3 and quarter 4 to date (−3%).

These are all novel changes. As an example, no prior year (2016 through 2018) compared to 2019 was more than 1.7% different for all injury and 1.4% different for total ED visits (compared to −19% and −18% for 2020 vs. 2019, respectively).

4. Discussion

Consistent with national estimates, from January to mid-November 2020 the total number of NC ED and injury-related ED visits decreased by 18% and 20%, respectively, following enactment of federal, state, and local policies aimed at reducing COVID-19 transmission [13]. The largest decline in NC injury-related ED visit counts was observed in quarter 2, with the number of visits in April 2020 nearly half that of 2019. Considerable variation by injury mechanism was observed, including greater reductions in MVT visits, lower reductions in self-harm visits, and significant increases in medication/drug overdose-related visits.

Several explanations for the observed decline in NC injury-related ED visits are possible. For certain injury mechanisms, the reduction in ED visits may be related to decreases in exposure, with more people staying home and avoiding activities that may result in injury. For example, reductions in MVT ED visits trend with US traffic volumes declining 30%–50% during this period [14].

Another likely contributor to the drop in ED visits is patient anxiety about contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus while receiving healthcare. Patient ED avoidance for the treatment of minor injuries reduces hospital transmission of COVID-19 and frees up limited healthcare resources for treating more severely ill and injured patients (including patients with COVID-19). However, patients delaying or avoiding medical treatment risk exacerbating injury morbidity and mortality (e.g., wound infections). In New York City, there were 5293 excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic that were not confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases, many assumed to be consequences of delaying medical care for serious medical conditions [15]. Recent evidence supports this conclusion, as national ED visit counts have decreased by more than 20% for life-threatening conditions, including myocardial infarction and stroke [16].

Not all injury mechanisms experienced large declines in ED visit counts during the COVID-19 pandemic. NC ED visits related to drug overdoses increased and self-harm visits decreased less sharply than for other injury mechanisms. Similar trends have been observed using national syndromic surveillance data [17]. These trends may be related to the exacerbation of substance use, anxiety and stress-related disorders during the pandemic [[18], [19], [20], [21]]. It is vital that resources are allocated to tackle the pandemic's effect on mental health, substance use, and violence.

Finally, the absence of injury-related ED visits does not guarantee the absence of injury. While ED visits are often used as proxies for injury incidence, these data may be uniquely insufficient during pandemics that reduce healthcare-seeking behavior. Individuals avoiding healthcare for safety concerns has serious injury surveillance implications.

4.1. Limitations

NC DETECT ED visit data are collected primarily for patient care and hospital administrative/billing purposes. Public health surveillance is a secondary function. While NC population-based ED visit data have many benefits and results may mirror other geographies, results may not be generalizeable to all US jurisdictions. Other data sources (EMS, poison center, deaths) may also yield invaluable insights.

5. Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on ED utilization patterns for the treatment of injuries, with NC injury-related ED visits declining an average of 20% since January 2020. Possible explanations include a decrease in exposure to certain factors, such as road traffic volume, and reductions in ED utilization and healthcare seeking behavior related to anxiety about contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Reductions in care-seeking behavior imply that current ED visit counts may underestimate total injuries more than usual. Social, economic, and other pandemic-related stressors may lead to increases in certain injury outcomes, causing increases in overdoses and proportionally smaller reductions in self-harm visits. Federal, state, and local governments should implement timely programs and policies to address injury outcomes exacerbated by the pandemic.

Data attribution and disclaimer

NC DETECT is a statewide public health syndromic surveillance system, funded by the NC Division of Public Health (NC DPH) Federal Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant and managed through collaboration between NC DPH and UNC-CH Department of Emergency Medicine's Carolina Center for Health Informatics. The NC DETECT Data Oversight Committee does not take responsibility for the scientific validity or accuracy of methodology, results, statistical analyses, or conclusions presented.

Credit author statement

Katherine Harmon: Conceptualization, Project administration, Methodology, Writing – Original draft preparation. Mike Dolan Fliss: Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Software, Writing – Original draft preparation. Steve Marshall: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Kathy Peticolas: Project administration, Writing - review & editing. Scott Proescholdbell: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Anna Waller: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – Original draft preparation.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

None declared.

Ethics approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This study was also reviewed and approved by the North Carolina Division of Public Health.

Data statement

The data used in this study contain protected health information and are not available for posting.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Lana Deyneka and Zachary Faigen with the Epidemiology Section, Communicable Disease Branch of the North Carolina Division of Public Health and Clifton Barnett, Dennis Falls, Amy Ising, and Shaun Mason at the Carolina Center for Health Informatics for their assistance in data acquisition and management.

References

  • 1.Li Q., Guan X., Wu P., Wang X., Zhou L., Tong Y., et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:536–544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020. https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed November 23, 2020)
  • 4.Holshue M.L., DeBolt C., Lindquist S., Lofy K.H., Wiesman J., Bruce H., et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:929–936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cases in the U.S. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html (accessed November 23, 2020)
  • 6.Kaiser Family Foundation State Data and Policy Actions to Address Coronavirus 2020. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/state-data-and-policy-actions-to-address-coronavirus/
  • 7.Lasry A., Kidder D., Hast M., Poovey J., Sunshine G., Winglee K., et al. Timing of community mitigation and changes in reported COVID-19 and community mobility - Four U.S. metropolitan areas, February 26–April 1, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:451–457. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carolina Center for Health Informatics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC DETECT 2020. 2020. https://ncdetect.org/ (accessed May 19, 2020)
  • 9.[dataset] North Carolina Division of Public Health, Carolina Center for Health Informatics [Data file] North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool Emergency Department Data, 2019–2020. NC DETECT. 2020. https://ncdetect.org/
  • 10.R Core Team R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2020. https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed November 23, 2020)
  • 11.North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services North Carolina Identifies First Case of COVID-19 2020. 2020. https://www.ncdhhs.gov/news/press-releases/north-carolina-identifies-first-case-covid-19 (accessed May 26, 2020)
  • 12.North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Governor Cooper Announces Statewide Stay at Home Order Until April 29, 2020. 2020. https://www.ncdhhs.gov/news/press-releases/governor-cooper-announces-statewide-stay-home-order-until-april-29 (accessed May 26, 2020)
  • 13.The Whitehouse Proclamation on Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak. 2020. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/ (accessed May 26, 2020)
  • 14.Hartnett K.P., Kite-Powell A., DeVies J., Coletta M.A., Boehmer T.K., Adjemian J., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:699–704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Institute of Transportation Engineers COVID-19 Traffic Volume Trends. 2020. https://www.ite.org/about-ite/covid-19-resources/covid-19-traffic-volume-trends/ (accessed July 1, 2020)
  • 16.New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) COVID-19 Response Team Preliminary estimate of excess mortality during the COVID-19 outbreak - New York City, March 11–May 2, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:603–605. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lange S.J., Ritchey M.D., Goodman A.B., Dias T., Twentyman E., Fuld J., et al. Potential indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on use of emergency departments for acute life-threatening conditions - United States, January–May 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:795–800. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holland K.M., Jones C., Vivolo-Kantor A.M., Idaikkadar N., Zwald M., Hoots B., et al. Trends in US emergency department visits for mental health, overdose, and violence outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Psychiat. 2021 doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Horesh D., Brown A.D. Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: a call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. Psychol Trauma. 2020;12:331–335. doi: 10.1037/tra0000592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Czeisler M.É., Lane R.I., Petrosky E., Wiley J.F., Christensen A., Njai R., et al. Mental Health, Substance use, and suicidal Ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1049–1057. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ornell F., Moura H.F., Scherer J.N., Pechansky F., Kessler F.H.P., von Diemen L. The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on substance use: implications for prevention and treatment. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113096. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES