Skip to main content
PMC home page
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1997 Jun 1;38(2):167–174. doi: 10.1186/BF03548496

Rearing Conditions and Foot-Pad Dermatitis in Swedish Turkey Poults

Effekter av uppjödningsmiljön på förekomsten av fotskador hos svenska kalkoner

C Ekstrand 1,✉, B Algers 1
PMCID: PMC8057025  PMID: 9257452

Abstract

A method previously developed for classification of broiler foot health status was used in order to estimate the prevalence of foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish turkey poults. Data on foot health were collected from 53 commercial turkey flocks at slaughter. The producers were asked to fill in a questionnaire on rearing conditions and equipment for every flock.

Lesions were very commonly observed, only 2% of the feet were classified as being without lesions, 78% had mild lesions (discoloration, erosions), and 20% had severe lesions (ulcers). There was a significant (p<0.01) effect of litter material on the presence of severe foot-pad dermatitis, flocks reared on straw showing higher prevalence than flocks reared on wood shavings. There was also a significant (p<0.001) effect of the type of water system, severe foot-pad dermatitis being more common in flocks reared in houses equipped with bell drinkers compared with flocks reared with small cups. The addition of extra litter during the rearing period resulted in significantly (p<0.01) lower prevalence of lesions compared with flocks where no extra litter had been added.

Keywords: bdhousing, welfare, litter, water, stocking density, ulcer, erosion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jan Svedberg for valuable ideas and discussions on the classification of lesions, and Linda Keeling for comments on the manuscript. This project was funded by the Swedish Poultry Meat Association (Svensk Fågel) and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

References

  1. Abbott WW, Couch JR, Atkinson RL. The incidence of foot-pad dermatitis in young turkeys fed high levels of soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 1969;48:2186–88. doi: 10.3382/ps.0482186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charles OW, Fortune J. The influence of diet and litter management on foot-pad lesions in turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 1977;56:1348. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chavez E, Kratzer FH. Prevention of foot-pad dermatitis in poults with methionine. Poult. Sci. 1972;51:1545–48. doi: 10.3382/ps.0511545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chavez E, Kratzer FH. Effect of diet on foot-pad dermatitis in poults. Poult. Sci. 1974;53:755–60. doi: 10.3382/ps.0530755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ekstrand C. Effects of stocking density on the health, behaviour and productivity of broilers. 1993. p. 46. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekstrand C, Algers B, Svedberg S. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ekstrand C, Carpenter T, Andersson I, Algers B Prevalence and prevention of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. (In prep.). [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Elson HA. Drinker design affects litter quality. Misset World Poultry. 1989;1:8–9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Geraedts LHJ. Leg disorders caused by litter conditions and the influence of the type of litter and of litter cultivations on the results of turkeys. Turkeys. 1983;31(5):20–25. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gonder E, Barnes HJ. Focal ulcerative dermatitis (“Breast Buttons”) in marketed turkeys. Avian Dis. 1987;31:52–58. doi: 10.2307/1590772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Greene JA, McRacken RM, Evans RT. A contact dermatitis of broilers–clinical and pathological findings. Avian Path. 1985;14:23–38. doi: 10.1080/03079458508436205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hale EB, Scein MW. The behaviour of turkeys. In: Hafez ESE, editor. The behaviour of domestic animals, Balliere, Tindall and Cox, London. 1962. pp. 531–564. [Google Scholar]
  13. Harms RH, Damron BL, Simpson CF. Effect of wet litter and supplemental biotin and/or whey on the production of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers. Poult. Sci. 1977;56:291–296. doi: 10.3382/ps.0560291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harms RH, Simpson CF. Influence of wet litter and supplemental biotin on foot-pad dermatitis in turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 1977;56:2009–12. doi: 10.3382/ps.0562009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hocking PM. Proc. Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. 1993. Welfare of turkeys. pp. 125–138. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hughes BO, Grigor PN. Behavioural time-budgets and beak related behaviour in floor-housed turkeys. Anim. Welf. 1996;5:189–198. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jensen LS, Martinson R, Schumaier G. A foot-pad dermatitis in turkey poults associated with soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 1970;49:76–82. doi: 10.3382/ps.0490076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Martland MF. Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododermatitis, leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening turkeys. Avian Path. 1984;13:241–52. doi: 10.1080/03079458408418528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martland MF. Ulcerative dermatitis in broiler chickens: the effect of wet litter. Avian Path. 1985;14:353–364. doi: 10.1080/03079458508436237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McGinnis J, Carver JS. The effect of riboflavin and biotin in prevention of dermatitis and perosis in turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 1947;26:364–71. doi: 10.3382/ps.0260364. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nairn ME, Watson ARA. Leg weakness of poultry–a clinical and pathological characterisation. Aust. Vet. J. 1972;48:645–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1972.tb09237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Noll SL, El H M, Waibel PE, Redig P, Janni K. Effect of diet and population density on male turkeys under various environmental conditions. Poult. Sci. 1991;70:923–34. doi: 10.3382/ps.0700923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Patrick H, Boucher RV, Butcher RA, Knandel HC. The nutritional significance of biotin in chick and poultry nutrition. Poult. Sci. 1942;21:476. [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson CE. Wilgus HS Biotin–a limiting factor in turkey rations? Feedstuffs. 1967;39:52–54. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tilley BJ, Barnes HJ, Rives DV, Gerig TM. Effects of litter type on focal ulcerative dermatitis (“breast buttons”) in male turkeys. Poult. Sci. 1990;69(suppl.1):195. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tucker SA, Walker AW. Hock burn in broilers. In: Garnsworthy PC, Haresign W, Cole DJA, editors. Recent advances in animal nutrition. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1992. pp. 33–49. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES