Abstract
Two selective plating media were compared to determine their performance in a three-step protocol for isolation of Salmonella from faecal, litter, and fluff samples. The encichment protocol consisted of: 1) Preenrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW), 2) Selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth, and 3) Plating onto EF-18 agar and BGA/L simultaneously.
From a total of 1101 samples, Salmonella was isolated from 158,157 of which were faecal samples. Thirtyone of these isolates were recovered on one medium only, 18 could not be found on BGA/L and 13 could not be found on EF-18 agar. The relative specificity and sensitivity of each plating agar was determined by enumeration of false-positive and false-negative reactions. EF-18 agar compared favourably with BGA/L, displaying a sensitivity of 0.92 as opposed to 0.89 for BGA/L, calculated for the “fecal samples” group only. The calculated specificities for each group of samples were likewise considerably higher for EF-18 agar (0.75-0.91) than for BGA/L (0.35-0.55). Though EF-18 agar is slightly more expensive than BGA/L, the routine use of the former may result in a considerable reduction in overall laboratory costs due to its superior selectivity. On the other hand the combination of the 2 media clearly would reduce the number of false negative results, with little extra cost.
Keywords: detection, selective and indicative agar, novobiocin, sulfapyridine
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,021.4 KB).
References
- Anonymous . Salmonella-bakterier. Pavisning i livs- medel (Salmonella bacteria. Detection in Foods) 4th ed 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Anonymous: Brilliant green agar (Code: CM263) In: Bridson EY (ed): The OXOID Manual, 6th ed. 1990, 2-53–2-54.
- Bager F, Petersen J. Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs. Acta vet. scand. 1991;32:473–481. doi: 10.1186/BF03546947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bisgaard M. 0get salmonellaincidens i slagtekyllin- geproduktionen. Mulige causale sammenhaenge og profylaktiske foranstaltninger. Dansk Veterinaertidsskrift. 1978;61:491–496. [Google Scholar]
- Brenner DJ. Family I. Enterobacteriaceae. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 1984;1:408–420. [Google Scholar]
- Cochran WG. The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika. 1950;37:256–266. doi: 10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ends P. Improved hydrophobic grid membrane filter method, using EF-18 agar, for detection of Salmonella in foods: Collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1990;73:734–742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joosten HMLJ, van Dijck WGFM, van der Velde F. Evaluation of motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (MSRV) and automated conductance in combination with Rambach agar for Salmonella detection in environmental samples of a milk powder factory. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994;22:201–206. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kauffmann F. Enterobacteriaceae. 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Kauffmann F. Serological Diagnosis of Salmonella- Species, Kauffmann White Schema. 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Sherrod PA, Amaguana RM, Andrews WH, June GA, Hammack TS. Relative effectiveness of selective plating agars for recovery of Salmonella species from selected high-moisture foods. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. Int. 1995;78:679–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warburton DW, Bowen B, Konkle A, Crawford C, Durzi S, Foster R, Fox C, Gour L, Krohn G, La Casse P, Lamontagne G, McDonagh S, Arling V, Mackenzie J, Todd ECD, Oggel J, Plante R, Shaw S, Tiwari NP, Trottier Y, Wheeler TD. A comparison of six different plating media used in the isolation of Salmonella. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995;22:277–289. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90179-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
