Abstract
Background:
Sepsis, a leading cause for intensive care unit admissions, causes both an acute encephalopathy and chronic brain dysfunction in survivors. A history of sepsis is also a risk factor for future development of dementia symptoms. Similar neuropathologic changes are associated with the cognitive decline of sepsis and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including neuroinflammation, neuronal death, and synaptic loss. Amyloid plaque pathology is the earliest pathological hallmark of AD, appearing 10 to 20 years prior to cognitive decline, and is present in 30% of people over 65. As sepsis is also more common in older adults, we hypothesized that sepsis might exacerbate amyloid plaque deposition and plaque-related injury, promoting the progression of AD-related pathology.
Methods:
We evaluated whether the brain’s response to sepsis modulates AD-related neurodegenerative changes by driving amyloid deposition and neuroinflammation in mice. We induced polymicrobial sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in APP/PS1–21 mice, a model of AD-related β-amyloidosis. We performed CLP or sham surgery at plaque onset (2 months of age) and examined pathology 2 months after CLP in surviving mice.
Results:
Sepsis significantly increased fibrillar amyloid plaque formation in the hippocampus of APP/PS1–21 mice. Sepsis enhanced plaque-related astrocyte activation and complement C4b gene expression in the brain, both of which may play a role in modulating amyloid formation. CLP also caused large scale changes in the gut microbiome of APP/PS1 mice, which have been associated with a pro-amyloidogenic and neuroinflammatory state.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that experimental sepsis can exacerbate amyloid plaque deposition and plaque-related inflammation, providing a potential mechanism for increased dementia in older sepsis survivors.
Keywords: sepsis, Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid-beta, neuroinflammation, complement, microbiome
Background
Patients who survive an acute critical illness in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at increased risk for long-term cognitive dysfunction (1). These cognitive changes often limit return of the individual to their daily activities, and place a significant burden on caregivers and society. One of the leading causes of critical illness in most intensive care units is sepsis and its associated multiorgan inflammatory response (2). Sepsis is associated with an acute and rapid change in cognition and memory, a condition known as septic encephalopathy (3). With improvements in mortality outcomes from sepsis along with the ongoing surveillance of survivors, it has become apparent that these cognitive changes may persist for years in those who recover from their illness (4–6). These long-term changes contribute significantly to ongoing disability among these individuals and may potentially place them at increased risk for further neurological sequelae in the future, such as the development of dementia or neurodegenerative diseases (7).
The specific mechanisms underlying the neurologic changes with sepsis are challenging to fully elucidate given the complexity of the condition. In the acute setting, multiple pathological processes likely play a role in causing neuronal dysfunction. Animal models of systemic sepsis, including intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), demonstrate an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the brain (8–12). The migration of neutrophils and monocytes from the periphery along with the local activation of microglia also contribute to the robust neuroinflammatory response (13–15). The presence of systemic-derived cells and inflammatory mediators suggest a breakdown in the blood-brain barrier, which could also lead to localized edema in the brain (16–18). Finally, the upregulation of oxidative stress pathways and nitric oxide-producing enzymes have been shown to play a role in tissue damage and neuronal dysfunction in preclinical sepsis models (17, 19). The end response of these maladaptive processes likely contributes to the combination of synaptic dysfunction (20) and neuronal loss seen in preclinical models of sepsis (21, 22). Similar to the acute phase of sepsis, these mechanistic factors may also be partly responsible for the long-term effects on cognition in sepsis survivors. For instance, mice that survive exposure to the CLP procedure have demonstrated continued presence of neutrophils in their brain 2 weeks after the procedure along with long-term expression of multiple cytokine and chemokine genes up to 50 days after the procedure (23). However, the lasting pathologic changes in the brains of sepsis survivors overall remain poorly characterized and are a necessary area of investigation.
A possible explanation for the long-term change in neuronal function in sepsis survivors could be due to the worsening of an underlying neurodegenerative process such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). One of the hallmarks of AD pathogenesis is the accumulation of the amyloid β (Aβ) peptide in the brain (24). Aggregation of Aβ into oligomers and senile plaques contributes to the development and progression of cognitive deficits by triggering neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal loss (25). Mounting evidence now suggests that the pathological changes of AD, especially the deposition of Aβ into amyloid plaques, can begin two to three decades prior to symptom onset (26). Biomarker studies using both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 levels and brain amyloid imaging via positron emission tomography (PET) suggest that a large proportion of cognitively normal elderly individuals have evidence of significant amyloid deposition in their brains (27, 28). The presence of substantial amyloid plaque deposition on autopsy in similar cohorts of patients with no evidence of cognitive changes further support these findings (29). Given the tendency of critical illness to afflict individuals in the middle to late decades of life, one can extrapolate that many patients treated for sepsis already have ongoing amyloid deposition in the brain. These patients may be at higher risk for worsening of their underlying neurodegeneration when exposed to the inflammatory, neurovascular, and oxidative insults that occur with septic encephalopathy. Understanding how the disease processes of sepsis and AD interact could thus ultimately lead to better understanding of the pathology of cognitive change after sepsis and potentially highlight new directions for therapy.
In this study, we determined how exposure to polymicrobial sepsis influences amyloid plaque deposition in the brain using CLP as a murine model of sepsis. CLP was performed in APP/PS1–21 mice, a model of AD-related β-amyloidosis, and the brains of surviving mice were analyzed two months following the insult. We found that the sepsis-surviving mice had increased levels of hippocampal amyloid load in their brain compared to sham treated animals. Sepsis also increased the extent of astrogliosis and complement activation in the brains of the animals, suggesting ongoing neuroinflammation. Finally, we performed an analysis on the microbial profile in different organs of the mice to determine if changes in bacterial content could potentially be influencing the extent of amyloid deposition. We found that CLP led to significant changes in the gut microbiome, but no changes in brain microbial content were present in the brain. These results highlight that exposure to the inflammatory insult of sepsis could ultimately lead to long-term changes in underlying brain pathology that subsequently contribute to worsening cognitive decline.
Methods
Mice
APP/PS1–21 (APP/PS1) transgenic mice expressing human APP with KM670/671NL Swedish mutations and human PSEN1 with L166P mutation (gift from M. Jucker, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany) on a C57BL6 background were bred with C57BL6 mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) to produce a cohort of heterozygous C57BL6 animals that were used for all experiments. APP/PS1–21 mice were then aged until 2–3 months prior to performing the CLP or sham procedure. An approximately equal number of male and female mice were used for all experiments. All experimental procedures in regards to animal care and experimental design were approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Sepsis Model
Cecal ligation and puncture was performed on all mice as described previously with some modifications (30). Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and then underwent a laparatomy via a small incision in the lower left quadrant of the abdomen. For pain control, the mice received an injection of buprenorphine SR (1 mg/kg) injected subcutaneously prior to the procedure. The cecum was then extruded from the abdomen and ligated approximately two-thirds of the distance from the ileocecal junction. The cecum was then punctured once with a 25 gauge needle and stool was extruded from the puncture site to verify patency. The abdomen was then closed via suturing of both the fascial and skin layers, and the mice received a 1 cc injection of 0.9% normal saline injected subcutaneously. All mice then received imipenem (25 mg/kg, subcutaneously) injected 6 hrs following the procedure. We have found in our laboratory setting that this protocol leads to approximately 50% survival in C57BL6 animals following the procedure. For the sham procedure, the cecum was extruded from the abdomen but no ligation or puncture was performed. Following the procedure, all animals were housed in normal light/dark conditions at ambient temperature.
Brain sample collection
Following the CLP or sham procedure, all surviving mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (200 mg/kg) and then perfused with ice-cold PBS containing 0.3% heparin. This was done either 2 months (histological and biochemical analysis cohort) or 5 days (bacterial analysis cohort) after the CLP procedure was performed. For the bacterial analysis cohort, strict attention was paid to aseptic technique during dissection. This included autoclaving all instruments and solutions prior to perfusion and dissection, the use of sterile gloves, and the sterilization of all instruments with 70% ethanol between each animal. Following dissection, one hemibrain was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hrs at 4°C and then stored in a 30% sucrose solution in PBS (pH=7.4) at 4°C until sectioned. The other hemibrain was dissected into specific brain regions and flash frozen for further biochemical analysis and stored at −80°C. For the bacteria studies, the cecum and liver of the animals was also extracted and flash frozen for storage at −80°C.
Histological staining and image acquisition
Fixed brains were sectioned on a freezing sliding microtome to obtain 50 μm coronal sections. All brain sections were stored in a cryoprotectant solution (30% ethylene glycol, 15% sucrose, 15% phosphate buffer in deionized water). For fibrillar amyloid staining, free-floating sections were washed 3 x in PBS and then incubated in PBS with 0.25% Triton X-100 (PBS-X) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The sections were then incubated in a solution containing X34 (10 μM X34, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) diluted in a staining buffer (60% PBS, 40% ethanol, 20 mM NaOH) for 20 minutes at room temperature, and washed 3 times in a wash buffer solution (60% PBS, 40% ethanol) and 2 times in PBS. All sections were then mounted on slides using Fluoromount G and cover-slipped.
For Aβ staining, brain sections were stained with the anti-Aβ1–13 antibody HJ3.4 (gift of Dr. David Holtzman, Washington Univ. in St. Louis). Free-floating sections were first washed 3 times in tris-buffered saline (TBS), and then incubated in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in TBS for 10 minutes at room temperature. The sections were then washed 3x with TBS and blocked by incubating in 3% milk in TBS with 0.25% Triton X-100 (TBS-X) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The sections were then incubated in biotinylated HJ3.4 antibody (1:1000 dilution) diluted in 1% milk in TBS-X overnight at 4°C. The following day, the sections were washed 3x in TBS and developed using a Vectastain ABC Elite kit (1:400, Vector Labs) followed by incubation in a 0.025% 3,3’-deaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) containing solution (0.025% DAB, 0.01% NiCl, 0.015% hydrogen peroxide dissolved in TBS). The sections were then washed 3 times with TBS, mounted on slides, and allowed to dehydrate overnight at room temperature. Cresyl Violet counter-staining was then performed by rehydrating the slides in MilliQ water for 2 minutes and then incubating in Cresyl Violet for 3 minutes. The slides were then washed sequentially with increasing amounts of ethanol (50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, 100%) followed by Xylene, and coverslips were placed using Cytoseal (ThermoFisher). The slides were then allowed to dry overnight at room temperature prior to imaging.
For glial staining, free-floating sections were washed 3 times in TBS and then blocked by incubating for 60 minutes in TBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 and 3% donkey serum at room temperature. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C in TBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 and 1% donkey serum solution containing either a GFAP (rabbit, Dako/Agilent, Z0334, 1:3000), S100b (rabbit, Novus, catalog number EP1576Y,1:2000), and IBA1 antibody (goat, Abcam ab5076, 1:500). The following day, the sections were washed 3 times with TBS and incubated for 1 hr at RT in TBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 with 1:1000 donkey fluorescent secondary antibodies. The sections were then washed again 3 times with TBS and mounted on slides using Prolong Gold mounting agent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
For image acquisition, a Zeiss Axio Imager Z2 fluorescent microscope was used for all wide-field X34 plaque and glia staining. Approximately 12–30 images (1024×1024) of the entire hippocampal and upper cortical region were acquired using a 10x objective, and then stitched together using Zeiss Zen software. For some of the glial staining, images were taken on a Zeiss LSM 700 laser scanning confocal microscope with a 63x objective using z-stacks of approximately 25 μm thickness with a step size of 0.5 μm. For Aβ staining, images were obtained using a slide scanner (NanoZoomer, Hamamatsu Photonics) and then exported using the NDP viewer software (Hamamatsu Photonics).
For confocal microscopy, 40x z-stacks were taken using a Zeiss LSM 7000 confocal microscope using 1μm step sizes. Images were generally obtained from the hippocampal CA1 region.
Image quantification
X34, HJ3.4, GFAP, S100b, and IBA1 staining were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH). First, the desired regions (hippocampus, cortex, or subregions of the hippocampus) were outlined by drawing ROI’s using ImageJ on 8-bit images. Thresholding was then applied to the images to include all of the immunoreactivity for each individual antibody, and this threshold was used for all sections. ImageJ was then used to calculate the percent of area covered. For the analysis, each date point represents one mouse and consists of 2 coronal sections per mouse.
For microglial morphology assessment, Iba1 hyperstacks were opened in ImageJ and different z-planes were used to make a maximum intensity projection (MIP). A ROI was drawn around a single microglia and was used to make a skeleton using ImageJ’s skeletonize plugin. The analyze particles function was then applied to gate out small artifacts. The Analyze Skeleton function was then used to count the number of branches. 6–8 microglia were quantified per mouse.
For peri-plaque microglial CD68 colocalization, confocal z-stacks containing X34, Iba1 and CD68 were uploaded to Imaris (version 9, Bitplane Inc.) and surfaces were created for each channel. A colocalized surface channel was then built between Iba1 and CD68. This volume was exported for each picture as well as the volume of X34. The CD69-Iba1 colocalized volume was then divided by the X34 volume from the same image stack for normalization.
Quantitative PCR
Flash-frozen brain tissue was homogenized in Trizol solution (Life technologies) using a Bullet Blender Homogenizer (Next Advance, Troy, NY). RNA was then extracted and purified using a PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). RNA concentrations were then measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. cDNA was made using a high capacity RNA-cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies). Microfluidic real-time quantitative PCR measurements were performed by mixing the cDNA with ABI TaqMan primers and ABI PCR Master Mix buffer in a Fluidigm Biomark HD system at the Washington University Genome Technology Access Center. All mRNA measurements. For all mRNA measurements, values were normalized to either β-actin (Actb) or Gapdh mRNA levels.
Western Blotting
Hippocampal tissue was sonicated in RIPA lysis buffer (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) containing complete protease inhibitor (Roche Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN), and then spun down at 15,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was then collected and the protein concentrations in the samples were measured using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher), and samples containing equal amounts of protein were loaded into nuPAGE 4–12% Novex Gels (ThermoFisher) and run using SDS running buffer. The proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane using an XCell II™ transfer device (ThermoFisher). The membranes were then blocked by incubating in 5% milk in TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with 0.125% Tween 20) for 1 hr at room temperature. Blots were then probed for either APP (6E10 antibody, 1:1000, Biolegend) or Tubulin (1:50,000, Sigma Aldrich). Protein signal from the membranes was obtained using a Lumigen TMA-6 ECL detection kit (Lumigen, USA) and quantified using Image J software (NIH).
16S rRNA sequencing and analysis
Whole gDNA was isolated from cecal, liver, plasma, and brain (cortex and hippocampus) samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen 15596026). Thawed samples were first transferred to bead beating tubes from the Powersoil Pro kit (Qiagen 47014), followed by addition of 1 mL TRIzol reagent to each sample and homogenization in a Mini-Beadbeater-24 (Biospec Products) with the following parameters: 2000 rpm for 2 minutes, followed by 1 minute on ice and another 2 minute cycle at 2000 rpm. Homogenized samples were spun down in a mini spin centrifuge and supernatants were used as input for gDNA purification following the TRIzol manufacturer’s protocol. In the final step DNA was solubilized with 8 mM NaOH and pH adjusted to 7–8 with 1M HEPES and 1 mM EDTA. DNA was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer dsDNA HS Assay (Invitrogen Q32851) and stored at −20°C.
The purified gDNA was used as template for 16S rRNA sequencing. We performed sequencing of the variable region (V4) of the 16S rRNA gene using 515F/806R PCR primers including Illumina flowcell adapter sequences to amplify the V4 region using the Earth Microbiome Protocol (31) (described in more detail here: http://www.earthmicrobiome.org/emp-standard-protocols/16s/). Briefly, the following 25 μL reaction was prepared in 96-well plates: 10 μL H20, 12.5 μL Taq Hot-Start DNA Polymerase (Takara R028A), 1 μL forward primer (10 uM), 1 μL reverse primer (10 uM), 0.5 μL template DNA (1 ng/uL). PCR cycle temperatures were as follows: 98 C for 30 s, then 35 cycles of [98 C for 10 s, 50 C for 30 s, 72 C for 30 s], then 72 C for 2 min. PCR reactions were carried out in triplicate for each reaction. In addition, a template-less control reaction was carried out for each primer pair. PCR products were assessed via gel electrophoresis to verify the amplicon size and absence of contamination, then were quantified using the PicoGreen kit (Invitrogen P11496), following the manufacturer’s protocols. 16S rRNA gene amplicons were sequenced by 2×250 bp paired-end sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform using custom primers (read 1: 5′-TAT GGT AAT TGT GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3′; read 2: 5′-AGT CAG TCA GCC GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT-3′; and index: 5′-ATT AGA WAC CCB DGT AGT CCG GCT GAC TGA CT-3′) at a loading concentration of 8pM with 25% PhiX spike-in.
For each mouse, reads from the hippocampus and cortex samples were concatenated. Brain, liver, plasma, and cecal reads were analyzed using the DADA2 package (v1.12) in R (32) which has built-in quality-filtering, dereplication, and removal of chimeric sequences, to identify amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). The R package DECIPHER (v12.4.0) (33) was used in conjunction with the SILVA SSU rRNA database (release 132) (34) for taxonomic assignation. Contaminant eukaryotic reads from spuriously amplified mouse mitochondrial DNA were removed. Despite relatively even raw read counts, after these steps bacterial read counts per sample ranged from ~200 (e.g. in the liver of a mouse that received sham surgery) to ~70,000 (e.g. in the cecum of a mouse that received CLP). Rarefaction analysis was performed using the vegan package (v2.2–5) in R {https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf} and only samples with a terminal rarefaction slope less than 0.01 were retained for downstream analysis, removing 3 of 84 samples. The R package phyloseq (v1.28.0) (35) was used to collate the DADA2 output (ASV counts and taxonomic identity) with sample metadata in order to calculate and compare alpha diversity metrics (richness and Shannon’s H), relative abundances of taxa per sample, and to carry out principal coordinates analysis on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities between samples. PERMANOVA tests for compositional differences (by Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) between treatment groups were carried out for each tissue type using the adonis function in the vegan package (v2.2–5). To identify taxa with significantly different relative abundances between treatment groups in the ceca, we used the linear discriminant analysis effect size method LEfSe (36) via the Galaxy web application (https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/), using treatment as the class, no subclass, and 0.01 p-value thresholds for the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon test steps.
Statistical analysis
Unless stated otherwise, statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v8.02. For most studies, an unpaired two-tail T test was performed to test for statistical significance between two groups, with significance assigned for P < 0.05. All data is presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean unless otherwise stated. For survival analysis, a log-rank Mantel-Cox test was used to compare between the different cohorts.
Results
CLP increases fibrillar amyloid burden in the hippocampus
To address whether polymicrobial systemic sepsis influences the extent of amyloid deposition in the brain, we performed CLP using the APP/PS1–21 transgenic mouse model of AD-related Aβ deposition. APP/PS1 mice have mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin 1 (PS1) causing increased production of Aβ and accelerated deposition of amyloid plaques beginning around 6 weeks of age in the cortex and 2 months of age in the hippocampus (37). CLP was performed on mice at 2 months, an age at which amyloid deposition is just beginning in the hippocampus in this model. Following the procedure, all surviving mice were aged for another two months at which point the brains were extracted and analyzed.
We performed a moderate form of CLP that led to an approximate mortality rate of 50% in our laboratory environment (Supp. Fig. 1). To evaluate whether the level of mortality and correlatively the level of systemic insult was influenced by the APP and PS1 transgenes, we compared the survival rate using the same CLP procedure on both APP/PS1 and Wt mice. The survival rate between both APP/PS1 and WT mice was not different (50% vs 55%, p=0.69).
To evaluate the extent of amyloid deposition in the brains of surviving mice, the tissue of both CLP and sham treated mice were stained with the X-34 compound. X-34 is a highly fluorescent derivative of Congo Red that detects the β-pleated sheet conformation present primarily in the compact core of mature fibrillar amyloid plaques (38). Mice that survived the CLP procedure had a significant higher level of X-34 signal in the hippocampus compared to sham mice (Fig. 1A and C, 0.35 vs 0.22 percent, p<0.05). The amount of X-34 staining in the cortex was not different between CLP and sham treated animals (Fig. 1B and C, 1.41 vs. 1.55 percent, p = 0.43), suggesting a region-specific effect of sepsis on amyloid deposition. We then analyzed subregions of the hippocampus to determine if the effect of CLP on hippocampal amyloid deposition was uniform. We found that CLP increased the amount of X-34 signal in the dentate gyrus compared to a sham procedure (0.79% vs. 0.47%, p=0.0082), but not in the CA1 area (0.2% vs. 0.23%, p=0.72) (Fig. 1D). These results therefore highlight that the overall increase in hippocampal amyloid deposition with CLP is heavily driven by changes in specific subregions. Finally, we evaluated the effect of CLP on total Aβ brain levels in surviving mice using an N-terminal Aβ antibody (HJ3.4). Interestingly, CLP did not significantly alter the amount of Aβ-reactivity in either the hippocampus or cortex compared to sham-treated mice (Supp. Fig. 2A and B, hippocampus, 0.33% vs 0.28%, p=0.43, cortex, 3.02% vs 3.28%, p=0.78). The discrepancy in the hippocampal changes in X-34 and total Aβ staining following CLP suggests that sepsis may have a propensity to trigger the conversion of Aβ into a more compact fibrillar structure that is primarily detected by the X-34 compound.
Figure 1: Increased fibrillar amyloid in sepsis-surviving APP/PS1 mice.

Representative X-34 stained (A) hippocampal and (B) cortical images from the sectioned brain tissue of APP/PS1 mice subjected to either a sham procedure or CLP (scale bar = 500 μm). (C) The percentage of hippocampus stained with X-34 was significantly increased in CLP treated mice (0.35 vs. 0.22, p < 0.05, n=8 animals for sham group, n=10 animals for CLP group), while the percentage of cortex stained with X-34 was not different (1.41 vs 1.55, p = 0.43). (D) In comparing different regions of the hippocampus, the percentage of the dentate gyrus area of the hippocampus stained with X-34 was significantly increased (0.79% vs. 0.47%, p = 0.0082) while the percentage of the CA1 region stained with X-34 was not altered in comparing CLP to sham-treated mice (0.20% vs 0.23%, p = 0.72).
CLP causes mild immune activation in APP/PS1 mice after 2 months and does not change amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing
Long-term immune activation following CLP could play a role in enhancing the formation of amyloid in the brain. A prior study has shown that the expression levels of multiple cytokines and chemokines remain elevated for up to 50 days after survival from CLP (23). Using quantitative PCR, we evaluated whether the expression of any immunological activators remain elevated in APP/PS1 mice following CLP. Sepsis-surviving mice overall demonstrated evidence of mild chronic immune activation in the brain, with significant elevations observed in complement factors C1q and C4b (Fig. 2). Importantly, C4b, which encodes complement protein C4, has been previously demonstrated to be increased in human AD brain, and to promote Aβ aggregation in vitro (39). A trend toward increased levels of C3, Il1b (encoding interleukin 1-β), and Ccl2 was also observed, while several other inflammatory transcripts were unchanged.
Figure 2: CLP induces complement gene expression but not other inflammatory mediators in APP/PS1 mice.

qPCR quantification of transcript levels for several complement genes and inflammatory mediators in hippocampal tissue from sham or CLP mice, 2 months after surgery. N=8 sham, 10 CLP mice. p values: * <0.05, ** <0.01 by 2-tailed T-test, ns= not significant.
Inflammation and certain pro-inflammatory cytokines are capable of increasing the activity of the enzymes α-secretase and beta-secretase 1 (BACE1), both of which play a critical role in the processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) into the Aβ peptide (40–42). Measuring changes in full-length APP along with its cleavage products is an indirect method to determine alterations in Aβ synthesis. Therefore, to assess whether increased Aβ production could be functioning in driving the increased amyloid levels observed in CLP-surviving mice, we evaluated the amount of hippocampal full-length APP and the C-terminal fragment of APP resulting from BACE1 cleavage of APP following CLP. We did not observe any differences in either APP or its C-terminal fragments (C83 and C99) in comparing CLP to sham-treated APP/PS1 mice (Fig. 3A, for full gel images see Supp. Fig. 3). We then measured the transcript level of the APP processing genes Psen1, Psen2, and Bace1 in CLP and sham-treated APP/PS1 mice and observed no changes (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results emphasize that sepsis does not result in any long-term effects on APP processing associated with changes in Aβ production.
Figure 3: CLP does not alter APP processing in surviving APP/PS1 mice.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and the C-termini fragments of APP (C99 and C83) from hippocampal lysates of APP/PS1 mice subjected to either sham or CLP procedure. One representative gel is shown. Tubulin served as a loading control. (B) qPCR assessment of APP-processing transcripts demonstrates no change in hippocampal mRNA levels between sham and CLP brain tissue. p values: * <0.05, ** <0.01 by 2-tailed T-test.
Hippocampal astrogliosis, but not microgliosis, increases in APP/PS1 mice following CLP
Reactive astrogliosis and microgliosis are hallmarks of AD pathology and likely play an important role in regulating the amount of amyloid deposition in the brain (43). Furthermore, extensive gliosis has been described in multiple preclinical models of sepsis and is postulated to be a driving factor in the acute and likely chronic neuroinflammatory process (14, 15). To assess if CLP influences the amount of chronic glial reactivity in the brains of APP/PS1 mice, we first analyzed the levels of GFAP in the brains of the surviving animals. Immunohistochemistry for GFAP (Fig. 4A) demonstrated a significant increase in hippocampal astrocyte reactivity with CLP (Fig. 4B, 4.3% vs. 2.26% for CLP and sham, p=0.01). To determine whether the changes in glial activity were strictly driven by alterations in amyloid load versus a diffuse overall increase in cellular reactivity, we also normalized the amount of GFAP reactivity to the amount of X-34 plaque load (Fig. 4B). After normalization, there was still a strong trend toward increased astrogliosis in CLP compared to sham-treated mice which was significant by 1-tailed but not a 2-tailed T-test (13.75 vs 9.26, p=0.039 for 1-tailed and 0.078 for two-tailed). This suggests that the increase in observed hippocampal astrocyte activation following CLP is predominantly centered around increased fibrillar plaque levels, but that CLP may also mildly exacerbate diffuse astrocyte activation across the hippocampus independent of plaque amount. We then co-stained a random subset of hippocampal brain tissue with GFAP and the astrocytic marker S100β to measure whether the increased GFAP levels are due to an increase in total astrocyte numbers (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, we found that while GFAP reactivity increased in the CLP brains, there was no significant difference in S100β levels between CLP and sham mice (7.44% vs 9.49%, p=0.11) (Fig. 2D). Taken together, these results highlight that total astrocyte cell numbers likely do not change with CLP, but the total amount of activated astrocytes (as evidenced by GFAP levels) is increased. To further analyze whether a specific subtype of reactive astrocyte was the predominant cell-type in the brains of CLP-surviving mice, we analyzed several gene transcripts relevant in A1 and A2 astrocyte polarization (44). Consistent with our staining results, we found the mRNA level of Gfap to be significantly increased in CLP mice along with the pan-reactive astrocyte gene Vim (encoding for the protein vimentin) (Supp. Fig. 4). However, no difference were observed in the genes encoding Serpina3n or the A1/A2 astrocytic genes Psmb8, Gbp2 (A1-specific), and Dd14 (A2-specific). Therefore, the astrocytic activation present after CLP in the APP/PS1 mice does not appear to show evidence of a definitive A1 or A2 polarization.
Figure 4: CLP increases chronic astrocyte activation but not total astrocyte numbers in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice.

(A) Representative brain images of GFAP and Iba1 from APP/PS1 mice 2 months after either a sham procedure or CLP (scale bar = 500 μm). (B) Quantification of GFAP immunostaining demonstrates an increase in GFAP (4.3 vs 2.26, p=0.01) following CLP. Also shown is the normalization of GFAP levels to the amount of plaque in the brain. Staining was then repeated on a subset of the sham and CLP-treated APP/PS1 mice with the astrocytic markers GFAP and S100β. (C) Representative images of hippocampal sections are shown (scale bar = 100 μm). (D) Quantification of GFAP was again increased following CLP (19.88% for sham versus 31.1% for CLP, p=0.015), while S100β immunostaining did not demonstrate an increase in immunoreactivity (9.49% for sham versus 7.44% for CLP, p=0.11).
Chronic microglial activation has been described in several different models of murine sepsis (15, 23). To determine if total microglial cell numbers are increased in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 that survive sepsis, we used immunostaining to measure the amount of Iba1 immunoreactivity in the brain of sham and CLP-treated mice (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, we observed no statistical differences in total Iba1 staining (6.36% of total hippocampal area for CLP mice compared to 5.06% for sham mice, p=0.3) or plaque-normalized Iba1 levels (19.6 vs 20.8 for sham and CLP-treated groups, p=0.78) (Fig. 5B). Given Iba1 levels may not specifically detect activated microglia, we also analyzed the extent of phagocytic activation in microglia and assessed for changes in microglial morphology. CD68 is a lysosomal protein expressed in macrophages and is known to be present in high levels in activated microglia. To assess for microglial-specific changes in phagocytic activation, we co-stained brain sections from a subset of sham and CLP-treated APP/PS1 mice with CD68, Iba1, and X34 (Fig. 5C). Notably, a predominant amount of the CD68 immunoreactivity was localized around plaque structures. No significant difference was observed in CD68 levels localized to Iba1 cells surrounding plaques when comparing sham to CLP-treated mice. The morphology of activated microglia also differs from resting microglia, as activated cells tend to become more ameboid in shape with fewer and thicker cellular processes (45). To assess for changes in microglial morphology, we performed a skeletonized quantification of the degree of microglial branching in both sham and CLP mice. While there was a trend toward a decreased number of branches per microglia in CLP-treated mice, the difference was not significant (Supp. Fig. 5). Finally, a unique subset of cells known as disease-associated microglia (DAM) have been described in neurodegenerative conditions and may play a role in regulating the progression of plaque deposition (46). Interestingly, we found that a set of DAM-associated transcripts (including Cybb and Clec7a, with Trem2 showing a trend toward increase) were increased in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice that survived sepsis (Fig. 5D), suggesting there may be subtle changes in microglia activation present in the brain after sepsis.
Figure 5: CLP does not change hippocampal microglial activation but does increase disease associated microglial (DAM) gene transcript expression.

(A) Representative brain images of Iba1 immunostaining from APP/PS1 mice 2 months after either a sham procedure or CLP (scale bar = 500 μm). (B) Quantification of hippocampal Iba1 immunostaining does not show evidence of changes in microglial levels (5.06 vs 6.36, p=0.296) following CLP. Also shown is the normalization of GFAP levels to the amount of plaque in the brain. To assess for changes in the phagocytic function of microglia after CLP, the amount of CD68 localized to plaque-associated Iba1-positive cells was quantified (C) Representative images of hippocampal sections are shown (scale bar = 50 μm). No significant difference was observed in microglial-associated CD68 between CLP and sham-treated mice (n=6 animals per group, images taken from the CA1 region) (D) qPCR quantification of transcript levels for several DAM genes from sham or CLP mice. p value: * <0.05.
Finally, in order to determine whether CLP itself leads to long-term gliosis that could impact plaque formation, we analyzed the amount of astrocyte and microglial activation in WT mice subjected to the CLP procedure. Two months following either CLP or sham, the brains from surviving mice were extracted and stained for either GFAP or Iba1. No significant difference was observed in either GFAP (Supp. Fig. 6A, 3.97 vs 4.00% for sham and CLP, p=0.93) or Iba1 (Supp. Fig. 6B, 2.93 vs. 3.74 for sham and CLP, p=0.15) when comparing CLP to sham treated mice without plaques. In summary, these data demonstrate that CLP leads to a significant increase in hippocampal astrogliosis in APP/PS1 that appears to be in part dependent upon the elevation in amyloid deposition.
Effect of CLP on the microbiota of APP/PS1 mice in different organs
Recently, changes in the gut microbiome have been implicated in modulating amyloid plaque deposition in mice and altering the neuroinflammatory response to plaques (47–49). The microbiota present in the brains of patient’s who die of sepsis also has been shown to differ from patient’s who die of other causes (50). We therefore decided to evaluate for any differences in bacterial microbiome composition between CLP and sham treated APP/PS1 mice to determine if these changes could be influencing plaque levels and inflammation in the brain. We carried out 16S rRNA sequencing of cecal, brain, liver, and plasma samples harvested from mice five days after CLP or sham surgery. Microbial compositions were significantly different in the ceca of mice that received CLP compared to sham surgery (PERMANOVA p = 0.001), with CLP cecal samples exhibiting increased relative levels of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria with a concomitant decrease in Firmicutes (Fig. 6), and a significant decrease in overall species richness (p=0.04, Wilcoxon). However, bacterial microbiome compositions were not detectably different in the brain, liver, or plasma samples between treatment groups (Supp. Fig. 7). Thus, we found that our CLP model causes pronounced alteration in the gut microbiome but no detectable changes in brain microbiota composition at this timepoint.
Figure 6: Comparison of cecal microbiomes from APP/PS1 mice that received CLP or sham surgeries.

(A) Relative abundance stacked barplots of cecal taxa from CLP or sham-treated mice at the phylum level. (B) Principal coordinates analysis ordination of cecal microbiomes based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities with 95% confidence ellipses by treatment. Adonis: PERMANOVA p-value from the adonis function in the vegan R package. (C) Discriminatory taxa significantly associated with CLP or sham surgery in the cecum identified by the linear discriminatory analysis effect size method (LEfSe). (N = 14 CLP and 7 sham surgery mice).
Discussion
Survivors of sepsis often have long-term changes in their cognition and memory that cause significant disability well after recovery from their initial illness (4). The pathophysiology underlying the acute effects of sepsis on the brain has been extensively addressed in both animal models and clinical studies (7, 51). However, the long-term molecular and pathologic sequela in the brain following sepsis remain poorly characterized. In this study, we analyzed whether the neurologic insults of sepsis influence the progression of the pathologic changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease. We have discovered that systemic sepsis alters the severity of the pathology present in a mouse model of β-amyloidosis in mice that survive their illness. Specifically, we found that mice that survive CLP have a significantly higher fibrillar amyloid plaque load in their hippocampus compared to sham animals. CLP also led to long-term neuroinflammation in brains of surviving mice, with significant increases in astrocyte activation and complement C4b gene expression. Finally, significant perturbations in the gut microbiota of APP/PS1 mice were observed after CLP, suggesting sepsis may shift the microbiome to a pro-amyloidogenic and neuroinflammatory state. Taken together, these results suggest that the chronic cognitive changes following polymicrobial sepsis may be secondary to the progression of an underlying neurodegenerative disease.
Imaging and biomarker studies continue to highlight that AD pathology develops years prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. The first detectable manifestation of the disease is the deposition of Aβ into amyloid plaques, as evidenced by decreased CSF Aβ42 levels and increased fibrillar amyloid deposits in the brain measured with PiB-PET imaging (26). Studies suggest that this process can start 15 to 20 years prior to individuals meeting the clinical threshold of an AD diagnosis (52, 53). Preclinical AD is very common among people over 65 and increases in prevalence with age (54). In fact, a recent study modelling pre-clinical AD suggests that over 46 million Americans may have some evidence of AD changes in their brain (55). Given sepsis predominantly affects the elderly (56), a great number of patients treated for an episode of sepsis likely possess the early pathological changes of preclinical AD in their brain. It is therefore not unreasonable to postulate that the neurological insults of sepsis, including neuroinflammation and alterations in blood flow, could produce long-standing effects on the progression of the underlying neurodegeneration. In this study, we modeled this clinical scenario in an animal model by subjecting APP/PS1 mice to CLP at 2 months of age. At this timepoint, this APP/PS1 model are just beginning to demonstrate the initial signs of amyloid deposition in the brain but have no evidence of memory deficits on behavioral tasks (37). Our finding that hippocampal fibrillar plaque load is increased 2 months following the septic insult has important translational implications in that it suggests sepsis could promote plaque deposition and neuroinflammation in older people with preclinical AD, potentially accelerating the onset of symptomatic cognitive decline. Future studies with human sepsis-survivors employing modern AD biomarkers, such as CSF Aβ measures or amyloid PiB-PET imaging, will ultimately be needed to address this issue.
Prior studies have addressed the extent to which a systemic inflammatory challenge influences AD pathology primarily by injecting mouse models of Aβ-amyloidosis with intraperitoneal LPS. These experiments have yielded conflicting results that seem to depend upon both the dose, timing, and frequency of LPS administration (57, 58). LPS administration has historically been used as a model of sepsis as well, though with significant limitations. These include the short temporal profile and large intensity of the inflammatory response along with the emphasis on one distinct inflammatory pathway (TLR4). For this study, we chose CLP as our murine model of sepsis. CLP has been postulated to be a more clinically relevant model of sepsis from a pathophysiologic standpoint given it causes a robust polymicrobial infection with a more sustained inflammatory insult. To our knowledge, the only study to assess the effect of CLP on AD pathogenesis demonstrated that wild-type rats have increased soluble Aβ levels in the brain 30 days following the septic insult (10). Our study is the first to show that CLP affects the accumulation of amyloid plaques in the brain using a murine model of human β-amyloidosis.
Our data suggest that sepsis interacts with amyloid pathology to promote inflammation in the mouse brain. In APP/PS1–21 mice, there were several inflammatory transcripts which were persistently elevated 2 months after CLP, suggesting that CLP exacerbates plaque-related inflammation. Transcripts which were increased by CLP include the complement genes C1q and C4b. C1q has been widely demonstrated to be increased in human AD and APP/PS1 mouse models, and has been implicated in modulating plaque formation and Aβ-mediated synapse loss. C4b transcript increases with aging in mouse astrocytes, and was recently identified in a single-nucleus RNA sequencing study of transcripts increased in human AD brain (39). That study suggested that C4b was expressed by oligodendrocytes, and demonstrated that C4 protein (the protein product of the mouse C4b gene) can seed Aβ aggregation in vivo, suggesting that inflammatory C4 production may promote plaque formation. While the exact mechanisms are not yet clear, persisting inflammation in the brains of APP/PS1–21 after sepsis may contribute to increased fibrillar plaque formation.
While not definitive, our data also suggest that gastrointestinal causes of sepsis, such as bowel perforation, which are most common in the elderly, could lead to gut microbiome perturbations which could potentially promote amyloid plaque formation and AD. Altering the mouse gut microbiome with antibiotics in an APP/PS1 mouse models (including APP/PS1–21 mice) can decrease amyloid plaques and plaque-related microglial activation (47–49). This effect is more apparent in male mice, and can be reversed by fecal transplant from wild-type mice (49). In a different study, a drug (sodium oligomannate) that reduces gut dysbiosis was demonstrated to improve cognition and reduce neuroinflammation in the 5XFAD mouse model of AD-associated amyloidosis, though the relevance of the specific bacterial phyla altered with this drug remains a topic of some controversy (59). The mechanism underlying the neuropathological changes in these studies is unknown, but one possibility is a change in the overall systemic inflammatory state that lessens the likelihood of amyloid formation in the brain. Gut microbiome changes have been described not only in APP/PS1 mice, but also in humans with mild cognitive impairment and with AD (59). Thus, sepsis-related microbiome changes could influence amyloid deposition and neuroinflammation, though specific bacterial changes which may drive disease need further elucidation.
In the present study, we found that the composition of the gut microbiota was chronically altered in the setting of CLP, with an increased prevalence of bacterial species from the Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria phyla and a decreased prevalence of Firmicutes. The relevance of these specific microbiota changes on the brain remain unclear, but several findings suggest bacteria from these phyla may regulate neuropathology in the brain. A recent study demonstrated that infection of mice with Porphyromonas gingivalis, a member of the Bacteroidetes phylum, leads to increased levels of Aβ in the brain (60). Relevant to our findings, Dodiya and colleagues recently showed that a multi-antibiotic regimen lowered amyloid plaque burden in APP/PS1–21 mice (the same model used in our studies), while at the same time reducing the relative levels of Bacteroidetes and increasing Firmicutes species (61). While not conclusive, these data suggest that further inquiry into the relative proportions of different bacterial phyla and their effects on amyloid plaque deposition is needed. It has also been postulated that increased relative levels of Proteobacteria lead to a state of heightened dysbiosis and increased levels of systemic inflammation (62). This pro-inflammatory state could then stimulate changes in the brain either through direct transmission of inflammatory mediators across the blood-brain barrier or communication from the gut to the brain through inflammatory reflex pathways mediated through afferent pathways such as the vagus nerve. Future experiments will need to address precisely how the gut-brain axis is altered after sepsis, and what role changes in the microbial content play in this process.
Finally, it has been proposed that a previously unknown function of Aβ may be to act as an anti-microbial peptide in the brain. Injection of certain bacterial species into the brain leads to the accumulation of Aβ around the bacteria, and ultimately seeds amyloid plaques in APP transgenic mice (63, 64). In terms of a direct link between brain bacteria and sepsis, transient seeding of the brain with gut bacteria has been reported in mice following CLP (50). Thus, we initially hypothesized that gut bacteria entering the brain after CLP may act to seed amyloid plaques in our model. However, we did not find a clear signal of increased brain bacterial load after CLP in our experiments. While a few mice appeared to have increased bacterial loads in the brain after CLP, it was not a consistent phenomenon across mice and did not show clear correlation with increased amyloid plaque burden. It is possible that bacteria were present in larger numbers at a different timepoint, as we only examined brains 5 days after CLP. CLP is a technique that can vary considerably from lab to lab, so it remains feasible that we would have seen brain bacterial translocation with minor variations in our surgical technique, or if our mice had a different basal microbiome. However, our current data does not support the idea that direct bacterial translocation into the brain is the cause of the increase in plaques observed in our mice.
In summary, we report that polymicrobial sepsis in APP/PS1–21 mice is associated with a persistent neuroinflammatory response, changes in the gut microbiome, and increased hippocampal amyloid plaque deposition. These findings highlight that some of the persistent cognitive deficits seen in older sepsis survivors may be due to acceleration of amyloid plaque pathology or exacerbation of plaque-related neuroinflammation. Future experiments remain necessary to define the mechanisms underlying these pathologic findings and to assess whether sepsis affects the pathology of other neurodegenerative disease, such as Parkinson’s Disease. Finally, determining whether similar changes are present in patients that have recovered from sepsis in the ICU setting is critical to ultimately translate these findings into clinically beneficial results.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Richard Hotchkiss and Nemani Rateri for their help with the CLP model, as well as Dr. Carey-Ann Burnham and Meghan Wallace for assistance with microbiology.
Funding: This work was support in part by NIH grants T32GM108539-06 (J.M.B), R01AG054517 (E.S.M), and R01AT009741 (G.D.). A.F. received support from the Chancellor’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program at Washington University in St. Louis. K.V.S. received support through the Research Scholar Award of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
List of Abbreviations:
- Aβ
amyloid-beta peptide
- AD
Alzheimer Disease
- APP
amyloid precursor protein
- CLP
colonic ligation and perforation
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- PS1
presenilin-1
- qPCR
quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests related to this work.
References
- 1.Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Pun BT, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1306–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, Reinhart K, Turnbull IR, and Vincent JL. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gofton TE, and Young GB. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8(10):557–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, and Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. Jama. 2010;304(16):1787–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR, Wunsch H, and Kahn JM. Population burden of long-term survivorship after severe sepsis in older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(6):1070–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Semmler A, Widmann CN, Okulla T, Urbach H, Kaiser M, Widman G, et al. Persistent cognitive impairment, hippocampal atrophy and EEG changes in sepsis survivors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(1):62–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Widmann CN, and Heneka MT. Long-term cerebral consequences of sepsis. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(6):630–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhao J, Bi W, Xiao S, Lan X, Cheng X, Zhang J, et al. Neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide causes cognitive impairment in mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Skelly DT, Hennessy E, Dansereau MA, and Cunningham C. A systematic analysis of the peripheral and CNS effects of systemic LPS, IL-1beta, [corrected] TNF-alpha and IL-6 challenges in C57BL/6 mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gasparotto J, Girardi CS, Somensi N, Ribeiro CT, Moreira JCF, Michels M, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates sepsis-triggered amyloid-beta accumulation, Tau phosphorylation, and cognitive impairment. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(1):226–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Erickson MA, and Banks WA. Cytokine and chemokine responses in serum and brain after single and repeated injections of lipopolysaccharide: multiplex quantification with path analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25(8):1637–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Semmler A, Hermann S, Mormann F, Weberpals M, Paxian SA, Okulla T, et al. Sepsis causes neuroinflammation and concomitant decrease of cerebral metabolism. J Neuroinflammation. 2008;5:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aguilar-Valles A, Kim J, Jung S, Woodside B, and Luheshi GN. Role of brain transmigrating neutrophils in depression-like behavior during systemic infection. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(5):599–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Michels M, Vieira AS, Vuolo F, Zapelini HG, Mendonca B, Mina F, et al. The role of microglia activation in the development of sepsis-induced long-term cognitive impairment. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;43:54–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne AM, and Godbout JP. Peripheral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge promotes microglial hyperactivity in aged mice that is associated with exaggerated induction of both pro-inflammatory IL-1beta and anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokines. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23(3):309–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hofer S, Bopp C, Hoerner C, Plaschke K, Faden RM, Martin E, et al. Injury of the blood brain barrier and up-regulation of icam-1 in polymicrobial sepsis. J Surg Res. 2008;146(2):276–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Banks WA, Gray AM, Erickson MA, Salameh TS, Damodarasamy M, Sheibani N, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced blood-brain barrier disruption: roles of cyclooxygenase, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and elements of the neurovascular unit. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bozza FA, Garteiser P, Oliveira MF, Doblas S, Cranford R, Saunders D, et al. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30(2):440–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barichello T, Fortunato JJ, Vitali AM, Feier G, Reinke A, Moreira JC, et al. Oxidative variables in the rat brain after sepsis induced by cecal ligation and perforation. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):886–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hippensteel JA, Anderson BJ, Orfila JE, McMurtry SA, Dietz RM, Su G, et al. Circulating heparan sulfate fragments mediate septic cognitive dysfunction. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(4):1779–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zaghloul N, Addorisio ME, Silverman HA, Patel HL, Valdes-Ferrer SI, Ayasolla KR, et al. Forebrain Cholinergic Dysfunction and Systemic and Brain Inflammation in Murine Sepsis Survivors. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Semmler A, Frisch C, Debeir T, Ramanathan M, Okulla T, Klockgether T, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment, neuronal loss and reduced cortical cholinergic innervation after recovery from sepsis in a rodent model. Exp Neurol. 2007;204(2):733–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singer BH, Newstead MW, Zeng X, Cooke CL, Thompson RC, Singer K, et al. Cecal Ligation and Puncture Results in Long-Term Central Nervous System Myeloid Inflammation. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Holtzman DM, Morris JC, and Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(77):77sr1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Selkoe DJ, and Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(6):595–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jack CR Jr., Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):119–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aizenstein HJ, Nebes RD, Saxton JA, Price JC, Mathis CA, Tsopelas ND, et al. Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(11):1509–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peskind ER, Li G, Shofer J, Quinn JF, Kaye JA, Clark CM, et al. Age and apolipoprotein E*4 allele effects on cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 42 in adults with normal cognition. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(7):936–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Knopman DS, Parisi JE, Salviati A, Floriach-Robert M, Boeve BF, Ivnik RJ, et al. Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62(11):1087–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Unsinger J, McGlynn M, Kasten KR, Hoekzema AS, Watanabe E, Muenzer JT, et al. IL-7 promotes T cell viability, trafficking, and functionality and improves survival in sepsis. J Immunol. 2010;184(7):3768–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012;6(8):1621–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, and Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wright ES. DECIPHER: harnessing local sequence context to improve protein multiple sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McMurdie PJ, and Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Radde R, Bolmont T, Kaeser SA, Coomaraswamy J, Lindau D, Stoltze L, et al. Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(9):940–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ikonomovic MD, Abrahamson EE, Isanski BA, Debnath ML, Mathis CA, Dekosky ST, et al. X-34 labeling of abnormal protein aggregates during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Methods Enzymol. 2006;412:123–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou Y, Song WM, Andhey PS, Swain A, Levy T, Miller KR, et al. Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature medicine. 2020;26(1):131–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yamamoto M, Kiyota T, Horiba M, Buescher JL, Walsh SM, Gendelman HE, et al. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulate amyloid-beta plaque deposition and beta-secretase expression in Swedish mutant APP transgenic mice. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(2):680–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Avramovich Y, Amit T, and Youdim MB. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs stimulate secretion of non-amyloidogenic precursor protein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):31466–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sastre M, Dewachter I, Landreth GE, Willson TM, Klockgether T, van Leuven F, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists modulate immunostimulated processing of amyloid precursor protein through regulation of beta-secretase. J Neurosci. 2003;23(30):9796–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):388–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541(7638):481–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Davis EJ, Foster TD, and Thomas WE. Cellular forms and functions of brain microglia. Brain Res Bull. 1994;34(1):73–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell. 2017;169(7):1276–90.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Minter MR, Zhang C, Leone V, Ringus DL, Zhang X, Oyler-Castrillo P, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations in gut microbial diversity influences neuroinflammation and amyloidosis in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Minter MR, Hinterleitner R, Meisel M, Zhang C, Leone V, Zhang X, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations in microbial diversity during post-natal development alters amyloid pathology in an aged APPSWE/PS1DeltaE9 murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dodiya HB, Kuntz T, Shaik SM, Baufeld C, Leibowitz J, Zhang X, et al. Sex-specific effects of microbiome perturbations on cerebral Abeta amyloidosis and microglia phenotypes. J Exp Med. 2019;216(7):1542–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singer BH, Dickson RP, Denstaedt SJ, Newstead MW, Kim K, Falkowski NR, et al. Bacterial Dissemination to the Brain in Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(6):747–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sonneville R, Verdonk F, Rauturier C, Klein IF, Wolff M, Annane D, et al. Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O, et al. Amyloid beta deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(4):357–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jack CR Jr., Therneau TM, Weigand SD, Wiste HJ, Knopman DS, Vemuri P, et al. Prevalence of Biologically vs Clinically Defined Alzheimer Spectrum Entities Using the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework. JAMA Neurol. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Brookmeyer R, Abdalla N, Kawas CH, and Corrada MM. Forecasting the prevalence of preclinical and clinical Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(2):121–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Martin GS, Mannino DM, and Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wendeln AC, Degenhardt K, Kaurani L, Gertig M, Ulas T, Jain G, et al. Innate immune memory in the brain shapes neurological disease hallmarks. Nature. 2018;556(7701):332–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tejera D, Mercan D, Sanchez-Caro JM, Hanan M, Greenberg D, Soreq H, et al. Systemic inflammation impairs microglial Abeta clearance through NLRP3 inflammasome. Embo j. 2019;38(17):e101064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang X, Sun G, Feng T, Zhang J, Huang X, Wang T, et al. Sodium oligomannate therapeutically remodels gut microbiota and suppresses gut bacterial amino acids-shaped neuroinflammation to inhibit Alzheimer’s disease progression. Cell Res. 2019;29(10):787–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dominy SS, Lynch C, Ermini F, Benedyk M, Marczyk A, Konradi A, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci Adv. 2019;5(1):eaau3333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dodiya HB, Frith M, Sidebottom A, Cao Y, Koval J, Chang E, et al. Synergistic depletion of gut microbial consortia, but not individual antibiotics, reduces amyloidosis in APPPS1–21 Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shin NR, Whon TW, and Bae JW. Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(9):496–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kumar DK, Choi SH, Washicosky KJ, Eimer WA, Tucker S, Ghofrani J, et al. Amyloid-beta peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(340):340ra72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Soscia SJ, Kirby JE, Washicosky KJ, Tucker SM, Ingelsson M, Hyman B, et al. The Alzheimer’s disease-associated amyloid beta-protein is an antimicrobial peptide. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
