Abstract
Planarians are flatworms and can perform whole-body regeneration. This ability involves a mechanism to distinguish between anterior-facing wounds that require head regeneration and posterior-facing wounds that require tail regeneration. How this head-tail regeneration polarity decision is made is studied to identify principles underlying tissue-identity specification in regeneration. We report that inhibition of activin-2, which encodes an Activin-like signaling ligand, resulted in the regeneration of ectopic posterior-facing heads following amputation. During tissue turnover in uninjured planarians, positional information is constitutively expressed in muscle to maintain proper patterning. Positional information includes Wnts expressed in the posterior and Wnt antagonists expressed in the anterior. Upon amputation, several wound-induced genes promote re-establishment of positional information. The head-versus-tail regeneration decision involves preferential wound induction of the Wnt antagonist notum at anterior-facing over posterior-facing wounds. Asymmetric activation of notum represents the earliest known molecular distinction between head and tail regeneration, yet how it occurs is unknown. activin-2 RNAi animals displayed symmetric wound-induced activation of notum at anterior- and posterior-facing wounds, providing a molecular explanation for their ectopic posterior-head phenotype. activin-2 RNAi animals also displayed anterior-posterior (AP) axis splitting, with two heads appearing in anterior blastemas, and various combinations of heads and tails appearing in posterior blastemas. This was associated with ectopic nucleation of anterior poles, which are head-tip muscle cells that facilitate AP and medial-lateral (ML) pattern at posterior-facing wounds. These findings reveal a role for Activin signaling in determining the outcome of AP-axis-patterning events that are specific to regeneration.
Author summary
A central problem in animal regeneration is how animals determine what body part to regenerate. Planarians are flatworms that can regenerate any missing body region, and are studied to identify mechanisms underlying regeneration. At transverse amputation planes, a poorly understood mechanism specifies regeneration of either a head or a tail. This head-versus-tail regeneration decision-making process is referred to as regeneration polarity and has been studied for over a century to identify mechanisms that specify what to regenerate. The gene notum, which encodes a Wnt antagonist, is induced within hours after injury preferentially at anterior-facing wounds, where it specifies head regeneration. We report that Activin signaling is required for regeneration polarity, and the underlying asymmetric activation of notum at anterior- over posterior-facing wounds. We propose that Activin signaling is involved in regeneration-specific responses broadly in the animal kingdom.
Introduction
The planarian Schmidtea mediterranea is a powerful model for the study of whole-body regeneration. In many planarian species a single animal can be cut into multiple small fragments, which can each regenerate a complete animal within a matter of weeks [1,2]. Planarian regeneration involves new cell production from a population of stem cells called neoblasts. Neoblasts produce all new cell types in planarian regeneration and also allow extensive tissue turnover in uninjured animals [3]. Planarian tissue patterning requires the regionalized expression of numerous signaling ligands and their pathway components [3]. Many such genes are termed position control genes (PCGs) and are defined by displaying constitutive regional expression and a patterning RNAi phenotype, or association with a planarian-patterning pathway. PCGs are predominantly expressed in planarian muscle [4].
The distribution of tissues on the planarian anterior-posterior (AP) axis and the head-versus-tail regeneration decision at transverse amputation planes prominently involve Wnt signaling [5–18]. A Wnt expression and activity gradient exists along the planarian AP axis, with the anterior being Wnt-signaling low and the posterior being Wnt-signaling high [5–18]. Multiple planarian wnt family genes are considered PCGs and are predominantly expressed in muscle [4]. Inhibition of the Wnt pathway, such as with β-catenin-1 RNAi, causes regeneration of posterior-facing heads [5–7]. β-catenin-1 RNAi during tissue turnover causes ectopic anterior PCG expression in the posterior and loss of posterior PCG expression, resulting in ectopic head formation [5–7,10,13,15,16,18].
Regeneration following transverse amputation of the (AP) axis requires a mechanism to specify formation of a head or a tail at the amputation plane–this determination is made within hours following amputation and involves wound signaling [9,10,12,19]. Wounds generically induce the transcription of ~200+ genes [19,20]. wnt1 is activated at all wounds and promotes tail regeneration at posterior-facing wounds. The gene notum is unique among wound-induced genes in that it is preferentially induced at anterior-facing wounds [12,19]. notum encodes a broadly conserved Wnt deacylase that inhibits Wnt signaling [21], and is required for the regeneration of a head instead of a tail at anterior-facing wounds [12]. The activation of these two genes results in a Wnt-inhibited anterior-facing wound for head regeneration and a Wnt-active posterior-facing wound for tail regeneration. Wound-induced notum expression occurs specifically in preexisting longitudinal muscle fibers, which are oriented along the AP axis [22]. After this wound-induced phase of notum expression, other anterior PCGs are expressed in muscle and progenitors for the anterior pole are specified. The anterior pole is a signaling center [23–26] comprised of muscle cells generated from neoblasts during regeneration [23–25], and the anterior pole also expresses notum [12]. Thus the two phases of notum expression in head regeneration involve distinct cells; i.e., the wound-induced notum+ cells do not directly form the anterior pole [12,23,25]. The asymmetric wound induction of notum is the earliest known difference in gene expression that exists between wounds that go on to make a head instead of a tail [12,19]. This step is therefore central to regeneration, yet, how the asymmetric activation of notum at anterior-versus-posterior-facing wounds is accomplished is unknown.
Additional wound-induced genes have roles in determining the outcome of planarian regeneration [9,27–29]. follistatin is activated at planarian wounds and is required for a set of cellular and molecular responses collectively referred to as the missing tissue response [27,28,30]. The missing tissue response involves cell proliferation at the wound, a body-wide increase in cell death, and sustained expression of wound-induced genes. follistatin is also required for regeneration of anterior PCG expression domains and head regeneration [27,28,30], but only when amputations are made in a Wnt-high environment (i.e., transverse amputation in the trunk and tail) [30]. follistatin RNAi leads to the upregulation of wound-induced wnt1 at 6 hours post amputation (hpa)–higher wound-induced wnt1 levels in an already high Wnt environment are proposed to block the ability of notum to generate a Wnt-low environment for head regeneration at anterior-facing wounds [30]. Follistatin is a broadly conserved negative regulator of Activin/Myostatin signaling ligands [31–34], and the follistatin RNAi head regeneration failure phenotype requires Activin signaling [27,28,30]. More specifically, the failed missing tissue response [28] and increased wound-induced wnt1 expression at wounds [30] in follistatin RNAi animals is thought to act through modulation of Activin signalling. Whereas follistatin RNAi causes upregulation of Activin signalling, the impact of downregulation of Activin is less well understood. ActR-1 (encoding an Activin receptor) RNAi can lead to ectopic pharynges [27] and some blastema splitting [35]. Activin and Follistatin have roles at wounds in multiple vertebrates [36–39]. These observations raise the possibility that Activin signaling is broadly utilized in animal regeneration, a possibility that remains poorly explored. Planarians are an attractive system to continue to dissect the mechanisms by which Activin signaling regulates regeneration.
Here we report an unexpected role for Activin signaling in controlling head-versus-tail regeneration through the regulation of asymmetric wound-induced notum expression at wounds in planarians. In animals with inhibited Activin signaling, ectopic posterior-facing heads form specifically during regeneration and are associated with a loss of asymmetry in wound-induced notum expression. We conclude that Activin has an essential role in the asymmetric activation of notum and in determining the head-tail regeneration decision at transverse amputation planes during planarian whole-body regeneration.
Results
activin-2 is required for regeneration polarity and regeneration of AP-axis pattern
Planarians, as Platyhelminthes, are part of the Spiralia superphylum [40]. Genes from various spiralian species encode TGF-β-family signaling molecules, including planarian activin-1 and activin-2 [27,28,36]. Prior work indicates that some of these spiralian proteins belong to a TGF-β clade that includes vertebrate Activin and Myostatin [36]. Phylogenetic analysis places Schmidtea mediterannea Activin-2 in a clade primarily made up of Activins; however, whether this gene and other spiralian Activins are derived from an ancestral myostatin or activin gene remains unknown (S1 Fig and S1 Data). Activin and Myostatin can signal through the same TGF-β receptors [41–43] and are sister groups within the TGF-β superfamily [44,45].
We inhibited the S. mediterranea activin-2 gene by feeding dsRNA for RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi of activin-2 (known as activin in [27]) was previously shown to suppress the follistatin failed regeneration RNAi phenotype [27,28]. After differing times of gene inhibition with RNAi, some animals were amputated and analyzed at time points post amputation (Fig 1A). activin-2 RNAi (S2A Fig) resulted in a novel phenotype involving both regeneration of a head at posterior-facing wounds and AP-axis bifurcations in regenerating blastemas, leading, for example, to two heads in a single anterior blastema (Fig 1B). The combined presence of these two defects resulted in variable numbers of heads and tails in fragments with both head and tail amputated (trunk fragments) (Figs 1B and S2B). At anterior-facing wounds, only heads appeared. By contrast, at posterior-facing wounds, animals regenerated a presumptive tail or combinations of heads and tails (Figs 1B and S2B).
Ectopic posterior-facing heads in activin-2 RNAi animals contained correctly positioned head anatomy, anterior head-tip (sFRP-1) and midline (slit) PCG expression domains, and developed a mid-body pharynx with reversed polarity, indicating that fully patterned anterior body axes developed with reversed polarity (Fig 1C). activin-2 RNAi animals that did not develop ectopic heads displayed normal anatomy and PCG expression in regeneration, with the exception of ectopic posterior mouth tissue in some animals (S2C Fig). Trunk fragments were generated at early (21 days) and late (40 days) amputation time points after RNAi initiation, and were assessed for components of the activin-2 RNAi phenotype after an additional 14 days post amputation. Polarity reversals were seen at the early regeneration time point, with penetrance not increasing with further time of RNAi (Fig 1D). Axis bifurcations at 21 days of RNAi were present mainly in the posterior and were associated with posterior-facing heads. Anterior axis bifurcation increased in penetrance over time–from 3/47 at 21 days RNAi to 20/55 at 40 days of RNAi (Fig 1D).
Both uninjured and regenerating activin-2 RNAi animals displayed ectopic pharynges, mouths, and esophagi (Figs 1C and S2C–S2F). Animals were assessed for ectopic pharynges prior to amputation. At the early RNAi time point (21 days) 5/41 animals had an ectopic pharynx; at the late RNAi timepoint (40 days) 36/38 animals had an ectopic pharynx (Figs 1D and S2C–S2F). Ectopic pharynges [27] and anterior head splitting [35] have been observed in Activin receptor (ActR1, dd_3426) RNAi animals, consistent with a role for Activin signaling in regulating pharynx number and preventing axis splitting. Inhibition of other patterning genes, such as ndl-3, wntP-2, and ptk7 can cause the formation of ectopic pharynges without causing axis bifurcations or polarity reversal, indicating that ectopic pharynx formation can be separable from the latter processes [15,16]. These observations–earlier abundance of polarity reversal than pharynx duplication in activin-2 RNAi animals and the lack of polarity reversals in other RNAi phenotypes with ectopic pharynges–suggest that regeneration polarity reversal was not caused by the appearance of ectopic pharynges.
In other organisms, activin genes are expressed broadly in muscle, intestine, and at wounds [37,46–48]. This broad expression pattern allows Activins to act as humoral agents signaling environmental states. In S. mediterranea, activin-2 was expressed throughout the planarian AP axis and most strongly medially (Fig 1E). This pattern stayed consistent after injury, 24 hours post amputation (S2G Fig). The medial enrichment of activin-2 expression was previously shown in a regeneration time-course of activin-2 expression [28]. activin-2 was lowly expressed in currently available whole-animal scRNA-seq datasets (S2H Fig) [49]. Muscle-specific scRNA-seq data indicates that activin-2 is expressed in nkx1.1+ circular muscle cells, as well as a cluster described as DV-like but not well characterized (S2H Fig) [50]. Expression in body wall and pharyngeal muscle, and intestine, was confirmed with FISH (S2I Fig).
activin-2 RNAi results in regeneration-specific AP-polarity patterning defects
Many planarian RNAi phenotypes that affect patterning in regeneration also affect patterning in uninjured animals undergoing tissue turnover. Uninjured activin-2 RNAi animals displayed mid-body widening associated with ectopic mouth cells, esophagi, and pharynges (Figs 2A and S3A). The aberrations to AP-axis polarity (posterior-facing heads) and AP-axis organization (duplicated heads/tails) that occurred during regeneration, however, did not occur during tissue turnover in activin-2 RNAi animals (Figs 2A–2C and S3B). This raises the possibility that the AP-axis-patterning defects of activin-2 RNAi animals reflect a requirement for activin-2 in some regeneration-specific (i.e., not essential or occurring in tissue turnover) processes.
In principle, activin-2 could be required for normal expression of patterning molecules during tissue turnover, such that alteration to the AP-patterning state results in polarity defects in regeneration. We therefore sought to determine whether homeostatic PCG expression region loss or reversal might occur in activin-2 RNAi animals at 21 days of activin-2 RNAi, when regeneration polarity was affected but regeneration axis splitting and pharyngeal duplication were minimally present. Transcripts for patterning genes that are normally expressed in the anterior (ndl-5, sFRP-1), trunk (ndl-3, wntP-2, ptk-7), posterior (wnt11-1, wnt11-2, and fz-4), and poles (posterior wnt1, anterior notum) were present and in the proper relative domain order in activin-2 RNAi animals (Figs 2B and S3B). We assessed boundaries and proportions of PCG expression domains, and found no significant changes, except for a subtle change in the anterior boundary of ndl-3 expression (S3C Fig). After 40 days of activin-2 RNAi, labeling with pools of anterior and posterior PCG RNA probes demonstrated that normal AP-axis polarization remained (Fig 2C).
These findings contrast with results for other genes known to control regeneration polarity outcomes, such as β-catenin-1 [5–7] (Fig 2C). RNAi of β-catenin-1 causes rapid and large-scale change of PCG expression domains throughout the body. activin-2 RNAi animals were also assessed after 60 days of gene inhibition. Animals continued to widen, became less flat, and possessed large lateral bulges of tissue (S3G Fig). Tissue bulges lacked ectopic cephalic ganglia (S3H Fig). Despite body plan and muscle fiber organization changes, the relative expression positions of ndl-3 and wntP-2 expression were preserved (S3H Fig). Similarly, ectopic tissue bulges lacked ectopic expression of the anterior pole marker notum (S3I Fig). These findings suggest that Activin might control AP polarity using a mechanism that is distinct from constitutive Wnt pathway regulation and might be regeneration specific.
The midline also appeared normal at 21 days of activin-2 RNAi. However, at 40 days of RNAi, a disorganized slit+ midline was apparent (S3D Fig). Disorganization of body-wall muscle fibers was also seen only at this late time point, although body-wall muscle cell number and the overall dispersed pattern of the nuclei of these mononucleate cells was normal (S3E and S3F Fig). Midline disorganization was correlated temporally with the increase in anterior bifurcations during regeneration (Figs 1C and S3D).
activin-2 RNAi results in symmetric notum expression at wounds
The patterning defects (polarity and axis bifurcation) of activin-2 RNAi animals observed only in regeneration prompted us to assess whether regeneration-specific adult processes required activin-2. We first assessed the process of wound induction of genes involved in re-setting PCG expression domains. FISH experiments demonstrated a robust loss of asymmetry of notum activation at 18h post-amputation in activin-2 RNAi animals with high penetrance (95.4%) (Fig 3A). At this time point, there was not a significant difference in notum expression between activin-2 RNAi and control anterior-facing wounds, or between activin-2 RNAi anterior- and posterior-facing wounds (Fig 3B). This suggests that there was not a general overexpression of notum at wounds following activin-2 RNAi, but a loss of notum inhibition at posterior-facing wounds. i.e., notum expression was no longer specific to anterior-facing wounds following activin-2 RNAi.
To assess whether the change in notum expression reflected a defect in the wound response, affecting many genes, we utilized RNA sequencing. RNA sequencing also allows assessment of other events occurring in regeneration after the generic wound response. We performed RNA sequencing of posterior-facing wounds at 0, 6, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-amputation and of anterior-facing wounds at 18 hours post-amputation (S2 Data). We collected posterior-facing wounds at all time points because this is the site of ectopic notum expression, as well as anterior-facing wounds at 18 hpa to compare notum expression across wounds. No significant defect in muscle-specific gene expression was observed at the time of amputation (0 hours post-amputation) (S4A Fig). These data together with the data that muscle fibers and cell numbers were not overtly abnormal at this RNAi time point (S3E–S3F Fig) suggest that the notum expression phenotype was not caused by obvious changes to fiber number or morphology. No significant defect in the averaged expression of 128 planarian wound-induced genes occurred in activin-2 RNAi samples (Figs 3C and S4B, and S3 Data). After the generic wound response phase, a missing tissue response occurs at major injuries and is associated with an enrichment of mitotic neoblasts at wounds, which can be detected as an increase in neoblast-specific transcripts at wounds in RNA-sequencing data. This occurred normally in activin-2 RNAi animals (S4B Fig). These data indicate that the generic wound response and the missing tissue response both occurred in activin-2 RNAi animals. Furthermore, activin-2 expression itself was not detectably asymmetric at anterior- versus posterior- facing wounds both by FISH and by RNA sequencing (S4C Fig).
Although most assessed wound-induced genes were activated normally in activin-2 RNAi animals, 6/128 displayed significantly different expression (adjusted p < 0.001) at 6 and/or 18 hpa in the RNA-sequencing data (S4 Data). notum was the most robustly changed gene in this data. We used FISH to examine the expression of some of these genes and observed that they were changed according to the sequencing experiment, validating our data (S4D Fig). We also performed FISH on other previously known planarian wound-induced genes, including a subset that are activated in muscle, and saw no overt differences in expression (Figs 3D and S4E). Among genes generically activated by wounding within hours of injury, wnt1 promotes posterior identity [8,9]. However, wound-induced wnt1 expression was not detectably aberrant in activin-2 RNAi animals by FISH or RNA-seq (Fig 3D and S2 Data). Of all wound-induced genes assessed by RNA sequencing, notum displayed the highest log2(fold change) (1.51) and lowest adjusted p-value at the time point when AP-regeneration polarity defects emerged following activin-2 RNAi (S4 Data).
Although not significantly different by RNA sequencing, foxD expression at wounds was higher in activin-2 RNAi animals when compared with controls by FISH, but only at late time points following RNAi initiation (35 days)–temporally correlated with slit+-midline and animal widening (S4F Fig). foxD is wound-induced in myoD+ longitudinal muscle (S4G Fig) specifically at the ventral midline [23]; increased expression is therefore likely associated with midline widening.
activin-2 promotes the polarized response of longitudinal muscle fibers to wound orientation independent of AP location
Ectopic notum expression at posterior-facing wounds occurred by 18 hpa, but was not present at early time points. By 24 hpa normal wound-induced notum expression lowered in control and activin-2 RNAi animals, reflecting the waning of wound induction (Fig 4A). Ectopic notum expression occurred at 21 days of activin-2 RNAi and later by FISH (S5A Fig). We therefore used 18 hpa at 21 days of RNAi to further characterize ectopic notum at posterior-facing wounds. Some regeneration phenotypes associated with defects in regulation of Wnt signaling only affect head regeneration in fragments from the posterior (e.g., follistatin RNAi) [30]. We therefore tested whether the effects of activin-2 RNAi on regeneration polarity are region specific. Elevated wound-induced notum expression at posterior-facing wounds occurred at every AP-amputation location examined, suggesting activin-2 RNAi impacted regeneration polarity across the entire AP axis (Fig 4B and 4C).
Wound-induced notum expression at anterior-facing wounds in wild-type animals occurs specifically in longitudinal muscle cells, which are oriented along the AP axis and express myoD and snail [22]. Ectopic notum expression at posterior-facing wounds of activin-2 RNAi animals was similarly specific to myoD+/snail+ cells (Fig 4D). These findings are consistent with the possibility that biology intrinsic to longitudinal muscle is responsible for generating notum-expression polarity at wounds, and that activin-2 is required for this process.
activin-2 promotes the local polarized response of newly specified longitudinal muscle fibers to wound orientation
Because the loss of notum polarity in activin-2 RNAi animals was observed at 21 but not at 7 and 14 days post-RNAi initiation, we considered the possibility that activin-2 was required during muscle cell turnover to maintain regeneration polarity. In this scenario, it would take time for a substantial number muscle cells at posterior-facing wounds to have been generated in cell turnover under activin-2 RNAi conditions to observe ectopic notum expression. activin-2 transcripts were significantly reduced by 7 days RNAi by qPCR (S5B Fig). Because neoblasts are the only cycling somatic planarian cells [51–54], EdU labeling marks a subset of newly formed cells originating from neoblasts. Consistent with the possibility that activin-2 RNAi affected the ability of newly made longitudinal muscle cells to display polarity, EdU labeling showed that notum+ longitudinal fibers at anterior- and posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals included newly generated cells (Figs 5A and S5C).
To further explore this possibility, we first utilized irradiation, which can reduce or eliminate neoblasts [55,56]. As a control, lethal irradiation (6,000 rads) two days prior to amputation eliminated neoblasts acutely in activin-2 RNAi animals and wound-induced notum was still symmetric (Figs 5B and S5D). Neoblasts are therefore not acutely required for wound-induced notum expression at activin-2 RNAi posterior-facing wounds. Sublethal irradiation causes a reduction in neoblasts, which was used to decrease cell turnover while allowing animals to survive for a long enough period of time to observe the impacts of reduced cell turnover. Animals were sublethally irradiated (1,350 rads) after 3 days of RNAi to severely reduce but not eliminate neoblasts, and amputated at 21 days of RNAi. These activin-2 RNAi animals displayed a marked decrease in posterior-facing notum expression compared to unirradiated controls or to lethally irradiated (6,000 rads) animals (Figs 5C and S5D and S5E). This is consistent with the possibility that irradiation blocked the formation of new muscle cells in activin-2 RNAi animals and that it is the newly differentiated muscle cells that display ectopic notum expression at posterior-facing wounds.
We also tested whether muscle cell turnover is required for the loss of notum asymmetry in activin-2 RNAi animals by using RNAi of myoD. notum is wound-induced in longitudinal muscle cells and myoD is required for new longitudinal muscle cell production in tissue turnover [22]. Therefore, RNAi of myoD causes a gradual decline in longitudinal muscle because new muscle cells fail to form and replace dying muscle cells during tissue turnover. Concurrent inhibition of myoD and activin-2 RNAi, to inhibit new muscle production, robustly blocked ectopic notum expression at posterior-facing wounds (Fig 5D); i.e., notum expression asymmetry (stronger at anterior-facing wounds) was present despite activin-2 RNAi. In this experiment, wound-induced notum expression was also decreased but not gone at anterior-facing wounds, as expected. There were similar levels of activin-2 transcript reduction between conditions (S5F Fig). The suppression of the activin-2 RNAi phenotype with irradiation or myoD RNAi further suggests that the activin-2 phenotype involves defects in the ability of newly generated longitudinal muscle cells to display asymmetry in notum activation at wounds.
Anterior axis splitting in activin-2 RNAi animals is associated with the formation of two anterior poles
By 48-72h post-amputation, the anterior pole forms at the pre-existing midline where it acts as a signaling center to influence ML and AP pattern in the blastema [23,24,26,57,58]. This time of regeneration is subsequent to the generic wound-response phase when notum is activated at anterior-facing wounds in pre-existing muscle cells. The regenerating anterior and posterior poles are newly generated cells with fates specified to make pole cells by transcription factor expression (e.g., foxD for the anterior pole) in neoblasts [23–25].
At anterior-facing wounds, some activin-2 RNAi animals displayed the nucleation of split anterior poles at 72 hpa (Fig 6A). Given the organizer-like role of anterior poles in promoting midline and AP pattern, this suggests split anterior pole nucleation resulted in double heads in anterior activin-2 blastemas. This split pole defect, associated with head duplication in anterior blastemas, occurred primarily at the late RNAi time point (40 days) when animals displayed multiple body shape abnormalities including widening. Anterior pole cell numbers (notum+ and/or foxD+) were similar between control and activin-2 RNAi uninjured animals at 21 or 40 days on RNAi, as well as in 72 hpa blastemas (S6A and S6B Fig). Some poles were not split but wider than in controls after 40 days of RNAi (S6B and S6C Fig).
Head blastema and anterior pole bifurcation is similar to the defect caused by RNAi of nkx-1.1, which is required for the maintenance of ML axis-oriented circular body wall muscle fibers [22]. activin-2 is expressed in circular muscle fibers, and its expression therefore decreases with circular fiber loss [22]. This suggests that the blastema bifurcation phenotype of nkx1.1 RNAi animals might be associated with reduced expression of activin-2. Furthermore, there was elevated wound-induced notum expression at the posterior-facing wounds of head fragments in nkx1.1 RNAi animals (S6D Fig). During early regeneration (48 hpa) muscle was present at activin-2 RNAi wound sites (S6E Fig) and activin-2 RNAi animals contracted wounds to promote wound closure normally (S6F Fig).
Ectopic wound-induced notum is correlated with the formation of an ectopic anterior pole in a Wnt-high environment
Posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals always regenerated at least one posterior pole, but also displayed simultaneous production of discrete anterior and posterior poles (Fig 6B). At 30 hpa, notum+ and wnt1+ cells were present in variable, but intermingled distributions at posterior-facing wounds; at this time point positive cells could include both pole progenitors and cells with residual wound-induced expression. Foci of cells reflecting new poles were not yet present (Figs 6C and S7A). Despite the largely dispersed and intermingled pattern of cells expressing these genes at this early time point, two distinct foci of either anterior or posterior pole cells formed later in regeneration.
By 36–38 hpa the anterior PCGs ndl-5 and sFRP-1 were ectopically expressed in a locally clustered manner at posterior-facing wounds, prior to substantial ectopic anterior-pole coalescence (Figs 6D and S7B). notum+ cells were present at this time, and localized to the regions of ndl-5 and sFRP-1 expression. However, there were few notum+ cells and they were not yet coalesced into tight foci reflecting new poles. At this time (38 hpa), posterior PCG expression (wntP-2) was still broad at the wound, but was reduced in level locally in the region of ectopic anterior PCG expression clusters (Figs 6D and S7B). The notum+ cells at 36 hpa were foxD+, indicating that they were pole progenitors and/or pole cells (Fig 6E). wnt1+ cells at this time were also regional and no longer intermingled with notum+ cells. Instead, local and separate locations of notum+ and wnt1+ cells at the same wound face were emerging (Fig 6E). In summary, by around 36 hpa ectopic local anterior PCG expression in activin-2 RNAi animals was associated with local reduction in wntP-2 expression and early stages of ectopic anterior pole formation spatially separated from posterior pole cells.
By 48 hpa both notum+; foxD+ anterior poles and wnt1+ posterior poles showed increased emergence at different locations (S7C Fig). By 72 hpa, all notum+ ectopic anterior-pole cells at posterior-facing wounds had coalesced and the ectopic ndl-5+ regions were expanded and stronger (Fig 6D). At 5 dpa, regenerating animals still possessed a global posterior wntP-2+ zone, with wntP-2 expression being only locally cleared near anteriorized regions (Fig 6F). Reduction of wntP-2 expression near anterior PCG foci was stronger at 5 dpa than when initial anterior PCG expression was detected at 36 hpa. In bulk RNA-sequencing data from activin-2 RNAi animals, an increase in posterior identity at posterior-facing wounds occurred normally, consistent with the local nature of the phenotype and its incomplete penetrance (S7D Fig). These molecular analyses only identified three combinations of heads and tails at posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals: tail only, tail-head, and head-tail-head.
These findings indicate the local nature of the patterning changes that occurred at activin-2 RNAi wounds–with local anterior PCG expression in part of the blastema associated with locally reduced posterior PCG expression, and with ectopic anterior pole formation only occurring near the blastema region with focal anterior PCG expression. This explains how both heads and tails were able to regenerate from single posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals. Furthermore, the percentage of activin-2 RNAi animals with ndl-5+ and notum+ foci at posterior-facing wounds at 72 hpa (23.1%) (Fig 6D), or ectopic foxD+/notum+ poles (18.2%) (S7E Fig), was similar to that of animals with ectopic posterior heads (31.9%) (Fig 1D). This suggests that ectopic wound-induced notum might only result in posterior-facing heads when ectopic anterior PCG induction occurred and was associated with reduced local Wnt activity and anterior pole formation.
PCGs are hypothesized to influence the specialization choices of neoblasts [3]. For example, RNAi of bmp4 results in dorsal epidermis-specialized neoblasts expressing ventral markers [59]. Consistent with this hypothesis, posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals had local eye-specialized neoblasts (ovo+) at 48 hours post-injury (Figs 6G and S7F). The location of these progenitors was proximal to anterior-PCG sFRP-1+ cells, suggesting that local changes in Wnt signaling led to local alteration in the fate choices of neighbouring neoblasts and the regeneration of posterior-facing head cell types that could organize into an ectopic posterior head.
Discussion
Pattern formation is the process of specifying the identity and organization of cells in spatial arrangements. Patterning in regeneration initiates at wound faces that are unpredictable in location and shape, involves production of variable combinations of missing cell types, and involves patterning of new tissue in the context of pre-existing mature tissues. These unique challenges suggest the existence of regeneration-specific patterning mechanisms. The resetting of the expression domains of patterning genes in muscle after injury has been proposed to drive planarian regeneration [3,22,30]. How patterning gene expression domains are reset after injury is poorly understood, but involves wound signaling. notum encodes a Wnt antagonist and is unique among known wound-induced genes in being preferentially activated at anterior- over posterior-facing wounds, where it promotes head identity [12]. How the polarity of wound-induced notum is established has remained unknown, but occurs in longitudinal (AP axis-oriented) muscle fibers [22]. One model is that some prior property of adult tissue, "polarity", is a pre-existing architectural cue leveraged by wounds to trigger asymmetric outcomes for anterior-facing and posterior-facing blastemas.
Prior work on regeneration polarity has identified components of Wnt signaling as required for the head-versus-tail regeneration outcome [5–7,9,10,12]. However, in APC RNAi animals, which have upregulated Wnt signaling [6], the asymmetry of notum activation at anterior-facing over posterior-facing wounds remains [12]. Wnt signaling itself might therefore not be a direct regulator of the polarity mechanism that enables asymmetric notum activation at wounds. Similarly, Hedgehog signaling is known to impact the head-versus-tail regeneration decision in planarians [60, 61]. hedgehog RNAi animals fail to regenerate tails [60–62] and RNAi of patched, which causes upregulation of the Hedgehog pathway, causes regeneration of tails in place of heads [60,61]. However, patched RNAi does not impact the asymmetric activation of notum at wounds [12]. Therefore, no signaling pathway is as yet established to be required for this upstream most polarity step in the process of head regeneration. Here, we found that Activin signaling is required for AP regeneration polarity, involving a requirement for wound-induced notum asymmetry. activin-2 inhibition had no detectable impact on the ability of homeostatic Wnt signaling to maintain AP PCG expression, consistent with the possibility that Activin impacts some process required for regeneration polarity but not homeostatic maintenance of the order of existing PCG expression patterns. Our data indicate that activin-2 affects the ability of newly specified longitudinal muscle cells to be regeneration polarity competent. Perturbing muscle production, such as with myoD RNAi, does not cause loss of notum expression polarity in remaining fibers; furthermore, longitudinal fiber number was normal in activin-2 RNAi animals with polarity defects. Therefore, the requirement for activin-2 in regeneration polarity is not simply explained by a defect in longitudinal muscle production. One hypothesis is that longitudinal muscle cells have AP polarity and that this orientation impacts the asymmetry of wound-induced notum expression. Inhibition of Activin could perturb the polarization of newly synthesized longitudinal muscle or a different process essential for the capacity of longitudinal muscle to properly regulate notum activation asymmetrically. Future work could aim to understand the relation between activin-2 signaling and asymmetric processes that result in longitudinal muscle displaying preferential activation of notum at anterior over posterior-facing wounds.
Ectopic notum expression at posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals was associated with ectopic anterior PCG expression, local reduction of posterior wnt expression, and ectopic anterior pole formation (Fig 7). Unexpectedly, this phenomenon could result in the simultaneous formation of discrete anterior and posterior poles and a head and a tail emerging from individual posterior-facing wounds. We propose that ectopic wound-induced notum expression can result in some anterior PCG activation, and that this can in some but not all cases lead to tipping points of local stable anterior identity. Why stable anterior PCG activation appears localized to only a region of the posterior-facing blastema and in only some animals is not fully understood. However, one possibility is that there is variability in how much anterior PCG activation is caused by ectopic notum expression at posterior-facing wounds. Local tipping points could then be stochastically reached, with sufficient anterior PCG expression resulting in more anterior PCG expression in new muscle cells. Such a self-reinforcing process could ultimately be stabilized by formation of an anterior pole from neoblasts choosing an anterior pole fate near anterior PCG expression foci. With a nucleated anterior pole, local posterior PCG expression inhibition and stable anterior PCG expression would occur. In many cases, a tipping point would not be reached, with posterior PCG expression dominating the entire wound and no ectopic anterior pole(s) forming. notum does not turn on as early at activin-2 RNAi posterior-facing wounds as it does at wild-type anterior-facing wounds, possibly explaining why this process is less robust than wild-type head formation. There could also be additional mechanisms that distinguish anterior- and posterior-facing wounds. Regardless, in essentially all cases involving ectopic anterior pole formation at posterior-facing wounds in activin-2 RNAi animals, posterior pole formation also occurred–anterior identity foci formation might have only been compatible with posterior pole formation when it was sufficiently spatially separated from it.
At anterior-facing wounds, activin-2 was required for the pattern of nucleation of the anterior pole, with inhibition of activin-2 causing the occasional nucleation of two poles. The regeneration-specific head-splitting aspect of the activin-2 RNAi phenotype was temporally correlated with midline widening and nucleation of multiple poles. These processes requiring activin-2 –wound-induced notum activation and the de novo nucleation of poles–are two processes unique to regeneration as compared to tissue turnover (Fig 7).
Activin signaling has been implicated in several processes in planarian biology from prior work. Inhibition of planarian follistatin, which encodes a conserved Activin inhibitor, can cause head regeneration failure when amputation occurs in the posterior [27,28,30]. This is associated with regulation of the levels of wound-induced wnt1, and activin-1 RNAi can suppress this phenotype [30]. Furthermore, follistatin RNAi causes a defect in the missing tissue response and this defect is also suppressed by RNAi of either activin-1 or activin-2 [28]. follistatin is activated by wound signaling [27,28,30], and these findings implicate inhibition of Activin by Follistatin in setting the levels of wound-induced wnt1 and in promoting the missing tissue response. notum expression was not determined to be aberrant in follistatin RNAi animals [30], unlike the case for activin-2 RNAi animals. Our data suggests that activin-2 does not regulate notum wound-induced levels per se, but specifically is required to prevent notum from being activated at posterior-facing wounds. follistatin RNAi should result in increased Activin-2 signaling and might therefore simply result in increased Activin-2-mediated promotion of polarity, with polarity therefore being normally generated. Inhibition of an Activin receptor-encoding gene can result in ectopic pharynges (ActR-1, dd_3426) [27] and anterior head splitting (ActR-1, dd_3426) [35]. However, Activin signaling was previously not known to regulate regeneration polarity at posterior-facing wounds. Together these findings highlight the prominent role of Activin in regulating processes at planarian wounds associated with key steps of regeneration.
Pattern formation in development involves prominent signaling pathways, including different Tgf-β signaling pathways. Tgf-β signaling ligands are subdivided into two major groups, which signal through different receptors and Smad-family proteins: (i) Bmp and (ii) a group including Activin, Myostatin, Tgf-β, and Nodal. Multiple of these signaling ligands have important roles in patterning embryos. For example, Bmp patterns the dorsal-ventral axis of embryos throughout the animal kingdom [63]. Bmp also patterns the adult planarian DV axis [64–66]. Among the other ligand group, Nodal has major roles in the specification and patterning of embryonic mesendoderm and in the development of left-right asymmetry [67–72]. By contrast, the Activin-Follistatin pathway has not been identified as a major regulator of patterning in animal development and instead is more prominently associated with non-patterning or adult processes [72,73]. In zebrafish heart and fin regeneration, the Activin pathway ligand-encoding gene inhbaa and the Activin receptor-encoding alk4 gene are expressed at wounds and are required for proper regeneration [38,39]. In mice, follistatin and activin are expressed at dermal wounds [37,46] and have roles in repair [74,75]. In axolotls, a Follistatin-like molecule, kazald-1 is specifically expressed in the adult regenerating limb and is required for regeneration [76]. Activin and the related Myostatin also have roles in adult homeostatic processes providing, for example, inter-organ humoral signals to regulate fat body and endocrine functions [47,48,77–79]. These findings raise the possibility that the Activin-Follistatin signaling pathway has broad roles in adult biology that are conserved in evolution, including in wound repair and regeneration. The many and distributed expression locations of activin-2 in planarians are consistent with the possibility that Activin might, similar to the case in other organisms, have a broad-acting (rather than only local) signaling role [73]. Our findings suggest some of these roles can include regeneration-specific pattern-initiating processes, and that Activin signaling might prove to be a major regulator of regeneration in animals. This will be an important possibility to explore in multiple additional regenerative organisms.
In conclusion, an Activin-family signaling ligand has essential roles in events occurring at wounds that initiate pattern in planarian regeneration. Disruption of these processes leads to body plan aberration with animals regenerating multiple heads and heads formed with reversed polarity. Activin is required for the earliest known step in establishing head-versus-tail regeneration–the polarized expression of notum that is selective for anterior-facing wounds. We suggest that Activin signaling is an important regulator of Wnt signaling at wounds to promote pattern in whole-body regeneration.
Methods
Double-strand RNA synthesis and RNAi
dsRNA was synthesized using in vitro transcription reactions (Promega) using PCR-generated templates with flanking T7 promoters (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG). 16 ul of template reaction was mixed with 1.6 ul of each rNTP (100 mM); 0.6 ul dithiothreitol (1M DTT); 4 ul T7 polymerase; and 24 ul of 5x Transcription buffer. Reactions were incubated overnight at 37°C. Forward and reverse reactions were then combined, followed by ethanol precipitation, resuspension in 30 ul of water and annealing (95°C for 5 minutes, room temperature for 20 minutes). dsRNA concentration was between 5–8 ug/ul. Animals were fed twice per week using a ~2:1 ratio of homogenized calf liver to dsRNA (13 ul dsRNA, 26 ul of calf liver, and 1 ul of dye per aliquot). At each feeding excess food was added to each dish so that not all food was finished; approximately 4 ul per worm. In all cases, animals were fixed seven days after the last feeding. For regeneration and RNA-seq experiment, animals were amputated one week after the last RNAi feeding. Contraction experiments placed some amputated animals directly into 100% modified Holtfreter’s solution (3.5 g/L NaCl, 0.2 g/L NaHCO3, 0.05 g/L KCl, 0.2 g/L MgSO4, 0.1 g/L CaCl2, pH 7.0–7.5) to inhibit muscle movement as a negative control for wound contraction.
Fixation
Animals were killed in 5% N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) in PBS for 3 minutes before fixation in 4% formaldehyde in PBSTx (PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100) for 15 minutes. Fixative was removed and worms were rinsed with PBSTx. Animals were dehydrated and stored in methanol at -20°C.
Whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridizations and immunostainings
RNA probes were synthesized using in vitro transcription reactions (Promega) and whole-mount FISH was performed as previously described (King and Newmark 2013), with minor modifications. Briefly, animals were rehydrated, bleached in a formamide based solution on a light table and treated with proteinase K (2 μg/ml). Following overnight hybridizations, samples were washed twice in each of pre-hybridization buffer, 1:1 pre-hybridization-2X SSC, 2X SSC, 0.2X SSC, PBS with Triton-X (PBST). Subsequently, blocking was performed in 0.5% Western Blocking Reagent (Roche, 11921673001) and 5% inactivated horse serum PBSTx solution and anti-DIG, anti-DNP, or anti-FITC antibodies were used overnight at 4°C. Washes and tyramide development were as previously described. Peroxidase inactivation with 1% sodium azide was done for 90 minutes at room temperature. An anti-muscle mouse monoclonal antibody 6G10 was used in a 1:1,000 dilution, and an anti-mouse Alexa-488 conjugated antibody (Life Tech) was used in a 1:500 dilution. Samples were stained with DAPI overnight (Sigma, 1 mg/ml in PBSTx). Nitroblue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (NBT/BCIP) colorimetric whole-mount in situ hybridizations (ISH) were performed as described[80].
Imaging
Fluorescence images were taken with a Zeiss LSM700 Confocal Microscope using ZEN software or with a Leica SP8 Confocal Microscope. Image analysis was performed using Fiji/ImageJ. For each channel, histograms of fluorescence intensity were used to determine the cut-off between signal and background. All FISH images are representative of all images taken in each condition. Light images were taken with a Zeiss Discovery Microscope. Cell counting was performed manually after blinding control and experimental conditions.
RNA-seq experiments
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Life Technologies) from animal fragments. Libraries were prepared using the Kapa Stranded mRNA-Seq Kit Illumina Platform (KapaBiosystems). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hi-Seq. Libraries were mapped to the dd_Smed_v6 transcriptome (http://planmine.mpi-cbg.de); using bowtie v1.1.2 with -best alignment parameter. The number of mapped reads per contig in every cell was quantified using the coverageBed utility from the bedtools v2.26.0 suite and reads from the same isotig were summed to generate raw read counts for each transcript. Pairwise differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2. Expression values from DESeq normalization were scaled, row-wise, to generate z-scores for heatmaps and visualized using the pheatmap package. Significance is reported as padj values, with padj < 0.05 used as a cutoff.
Irradiation
Animals were irradiated using a dual Gammacell-40 137 cesium source to deliver either 1350 or 6,000 rads.
EdU delivery and labeling
Animals were fed EdU (Sigma #T511293) diluted in liver to 0.5 mg/ml and 1% DMSO. Following feeding, animals were incubated in 5g/L Instant Ocean until fixation. Animals were processed using the FISH protocol with a modified EdU labeling step after probe hybridization. Animals were incubated in the dark for 30 min in an azide click reaction containing 1% 100 mM CuSO4, 0.1% 10mM azide-fluorophore 545 (Sigma #MKCH3642), 20% 50 mM ascorbic acid from (+) sodium-L-ascorbate in PBS. Ascorbic acid was made fresh for each reaction. After EdU labeling animals were washed in PBSTx 3x and FISH protocol was continued.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the Prism software package (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA). Comparisons between the means of two populations were done by a Student’s t test. Comparisons of means between multiple populations were done by one-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was used when analyzing more than two conditions. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. Statistical tests, significance, data points, error bars and animal numbers (n) for each figure are provided in the legends.
qPCR
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Life Technologies) from animal fragments. activin-2 primers were designed to include both a portion of the dsRNA construct and the rest of the endogenous gene in order to avoid amplification of dsRNA. Primers for activin-2 amplification are as follows: tccaatcatgcttctcaaagga and tcaactggattggccataattg. The SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) was used to create cDNA from 500 ng of RNA input. CT values were calculated as the average of three technical replicates. These values were then normalized to the housekeeping gene g6pd (S2A Fig) or gapdh (S5B and S5F Fig) in order to calculate the ΔCt. -ΔΔCt values were calculated by measuring the difference of a given ΔCt to that of control replicates. 2-ΔΔCt values are plotted as data in a bar graph, along with the standard deviation for each set of values.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Reddien lab for discussions and comments on the manuscript.
Data Availability
All data is deposited and available at NCBI GSE148376.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Eleanor Schwartz Charitable Foundation (to PWR). PWR is an investigator of HHMI. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Randolph H. Observations and experiments on regeneration in planarians. Arch Entw Mech Org. 1897;5:352–72. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morgan TH. Experimental studies of the regeneration of Planaria maculata. Arch Entw Mech Org. 1898;7:364–97. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reddien PW. The Cellular and Molecular Basis for Planarian Regeneration. Cell. 2018;175(2):327–45. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Witchley JN, Mayer M, Wagner DE, Owen JH, Reddien PW. Muscle cells provide instructions for planarian regeneration. Cell Reports. 2013;4(4):633–41. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Petersen CP, Reddien PW. Smed-betacatenin-1 is required for anteroposterior blastema polarity in planarian regeneration. Science. 2008;319(5861):327–30. 10.1126/science.1149943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gurley KA, Rink JC, Sánchez Alvarado A. Beta-catenin defines head versus tail identity during planarian regeneration and homeostasis. Science. 2008;319(5861):323–7. 10.1126/science.1150029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iglesias M, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Saló E, Adell T. Silencing of Smed-betacatenin1 generates radial-like hypercephalized planarians. Development. 2008;135(7):1215–21. 10.1242/dev.020289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Adell T, Saló E, Boutros M, Bartscherer K. Smed-Evi/Wntless is required for beta-catenin-dependent and -independent processes during planarian regeneration. Development. 2009;136(6):905–10. 10.1242/dev.033761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Petersen CP, Reddien PW. A wound-induced Wnt expression program controls planarian regeneration polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(40):17061–6. 10.1073/pnas.0906823106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gurley KA, Elliott SA, Simakov O, Schmidt HA, Holstein TW, Sánchez Alvarado A. Expression of secreted Wnt pathway components reveals unexpected complexity of the planarian amputation response. Dev Biol. 2010;347(1):24–39. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Almuedo-Castillo M, Saló E, Adell T. Dishevelled is essential for neural connectivity and planar cell polarity in planarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):2813–8. 10.1073/pnas.1012090108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Petersen CP, Reddien PW. Polarized notum activation at wounds inhibits Wnt function to promote planarian head regeneration. Science. 2011;332(6031):852–5. 10.1126/science.1202143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reuter H, Marz M, Vogg MC, Eccles D, Grifol-Boldu L, Wehner D, et al. Beta-catenin-dependent control of positional information along the AP body axis in planarians involves a teashirt family member. Cell Rep. 2015;10(2):253–65. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Owen JH, Wagner DE, Chen CC, Petersen CP, Reddien PW. teashirt is required for head-versus-tail regeneration polarity in planarians. Development. 2015;142(6):1062–72. 10.1242/dev.119685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scimone ML, Cote LE, Rogers T, Reddien PW. Two FGFRL-Wnt circuits organize the planarian anteroposterior axis. Elife. 2016;5. 10.7554/eLife.12845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lander R, Petersen CP. Wnt, Ptk7, and FGFRL expression gradients control trunk positional identity in planarian regeneration. Elife. 2016;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sureda-Gomez M, Martin-Duran JM, Adell T. Localization of planarian beta-CATENIN-1 reveals multiple roles during anterior-posterior regeneration and organogenesis. Development. 2016;143(22):4149–60. 10.1242/dev.135152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stuckemann T, Cleland JP, Werner S, Thi-Kim Vu H, Bayersdorf R, Liu SY, et al. Antagonistic Self-Organizing Patterning Systems Control Maintenance and Regeneration of the Anteroposterior Axis in Planarians. Dev Cell. 2017;40(3):248–63 e4. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wurtzel O, Cote LE, Poirier A, Satija R, Regev A, Reddien PW. A Generic and Cell-Type-Specific Wound Response Precedes Regeneration in Planarians. Dev Cell. 2015;35(5):632–45. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wenemoser D, Lapan SW, Wilkinson AW, Bell GW, Reddien PW. A molecular wound response program associated with regeneration initiation in planarians. Genes & Development. 2012;26(9):988–1002. 10.1101/gad.187377.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kakugawa S, Langton PF, Zebisch M, Howell S, Chang TH, Liu Y, et al. Notum deacylates Wnt proteins to suppress signalling activity. Nature. 2015;519(7542):187–92. 10.1038/nature14259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scimone ML, Cote LE, Reddien PW. Orthogonal muscle fibres have different instructive roles in planarian regeneration. Nature. 2017;551(7682):623–8. 10.1038/nature24660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Scimone ML, Lapan SW, Reddien PW. A forkhead transcription factor is wound-induced at the planarian midline and required for anterior pole regeneration. PLoS genetics. 2014;10(1):e1003999. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vogg MC, Owlarn S, Perez Rico YA, Xie J, Suzuki Y, Gentile L, et al. Stem cell-dependent formation of a functional anterior regeneration pole in planarians requires Zic and Forkhead transcription factors. Developmental Biology. 2014;390(2):136–48. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vasquez-Doorman C, Petersen CP. zic-1 Expression in planarian neoblasts after injury controls anterior pole regeneration. PLoS genetics. 2014;10(7):e1004452. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oderberg IM, Li DJ, Scimone ML, Gavino MA, Reddien PW. Landmarks in Existing Tissue at Wounds Are Utilized to Generate Pattern in Regenerating Tissue. Curr Biol. 2017;27(5):733–42. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Roberts-Galbraith RH, Newmark PA. Follistatin antagonizes activin signaling and acts with notum to direct planarian head regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(4):1363–8. 10.1073/pnas.1214053110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gavino MA, Wenemoser D, Wang IE, Reddien PW. Tissue absence initiates regeneration through Follistatin-mediated inhibition of Activin signaling. eLife. 2013;2:e00247. 10.7554/eLife.00247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gehrke AR, Neverett E, Luo YJ, Brandt A, Ricci L, Hulett RE, et al. Acoel genome reveals the regulatory landscape of whole-body regeneration. Science. 2019;363(6432). 10.1126/science.aau6173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tewari AG, Stern SR, Oderberg IM, Reddien PW. Cellular and Molecular Responses Unique to Major Injury Are Dispensable for Planarian Regeneration. Cell Rep. 2018;25(9):2577–90 e3. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakamura T, Takio K, Eto Y, Shibai H, Titani K, Sugino H. Activin-binding protein from rat ovary is follistatin. Science. 1990;247(4944):836–8. 10.1126/science.2106159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Kelly OG, Melton DA. Follistatin, an antagonist of activin, is expressed in the Spemann organizer and displays direct neuralizing activity. Cell. 1994;77(2):283–95. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90320-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hill JJ, Davies MV, Pearson AA, Wang JH, Hewick RM, Wolfman NM, et al. The myostatin propeptide and the follistatin-related gene are inhibitory binding proteins of myostatin in normal serum. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(43):40735–41. 10.1074/jbc.M206379200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gilson H, Schakman O, Kalista S, Lause P, Tsuchida K, Thissen JP. Follistatin induces muscle hypertrophy through satellite cell proliferation and inhibition of both myostatin and activin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;297(1):E157–64. 10.1152/ajpendo.00193.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arnold CP, Benham-Pyle BW, Lange JJ, Wood CJ, Sánchez Alvarado A. Wnt and TGFbeta coordinate growth and patterning to regulate size-dependent behaviour. Nature. 2019;572(7771):655–9. 10.1038/s41586-019-1478-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kenny NJ, Namigai EK, Dearden PK, Hui JH, Grande C, Shimeld SM. The Lophotrochozoan TGF-beta signalling cassette—diversification and conservation in a key signalling pathway. Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(6–8):533–49. 10.1387/ijdb.140080nk [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wankell M, Kaesler S, Zhang YQ, Florence C, Werner S, Duan R. The activin binding proteins follistatin and follistatin-related protein are differentially regulated in vitro and during cutaneous wound repair. J Endocrinol. 2001;171(3):385–95. 10.1677/joe.0.1710385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jazwinska A, Badakov R, Keating MT. Activin-betaA signaling is required for zebrafish fin regeneration. Curr Biol. 2007;17(16):1390–5. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dogra D, Ahuja S, Kim HT, Rasouli SJ, Stainier DYR, Reischauer S. Opposite effects of Activin type 2 receptor ligands on cardiomyocyte proliferation during development and repair. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1902. 10.1038/s41467-017-01950-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Edgecombe GD, Giribet G, Dunn CW, Henjol A, M. Kristensen RM. Rouse GW, et al. Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions. Organisms Diversity & Evol. 2011;11(2):151–72. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee SJ, Reed LA, Davies MV, Girgenrath S, Goad ME, Tomkinson KN, et al. Regulation of muscle growth by multiple ligands signaling through activin type II receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(50):18117–22. 10.1073/pnas.0505996102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Massague J, Blain SW, Lo RS. TGFbeta signaling in growth control, cancer, and heritable disorders. Cell. 2000;103(2):295–309. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00121-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Morvan F, Rondeau JM, Zou C, Minetti G, Scheufler C, Scharenberg M, et al. Blockade of activin type II receptors with a dual anti-ActRIIA/IIB antibody is critical to promote maximal skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(47):12448–53. 10.1073/pnas.1707925114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Newfeld SJ, Wisotzkey RG, Kumar S. Molecular evolution of a developmental pathway: phylogenetic analyses of transforming growth factor-beta family ligands, receptors and Smad signal transducers. Genetics. 1999;152(2):783–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kahlem P, Newfeld SJ. Informatics approaches to understanding TGFbeta pathway regulation. Development. 2009;136(22):3729–40. 10.1242/dev.030320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Munz B, Hubner G, Tretter Y, Alzheimer C, Werner S. A novel role of activin in inflammation and repair. J Endocrinol. 1999;161(2):187–93. 10.1677/joe.0.1610187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Song W, Cheng D, Hong S, Sappe B, Hu Y, Wei N, et al. Midgut-Derived Activin Regulates Glucagon-like Action in the Fat Body and Glycemic Control. Cell Metab. 2017;25(2):386–99. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Song W, Owusu-Ansah E, Hu Y, Cheng D, Ni X, Zirin J, et al. Activin signaling mediates muscle-to-adipose communication in a mitochondria dysfunction-associated obesity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(32):8596–601. 10.1073/pnas.1708037114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fincher CT, Wurtzel O, de Hoog T, Kravarik KM, Reddien PW. Cell type transcriptome atlas for the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Science. 2018;360(6391). 10.1126/science.aaq1736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Scimone ML, Wurtzel O, Malecek K, Fincher CT, Oderberg IM, Kravarik KM, et al. foxF-1 Controls Specification of Non-body Wall Muscle and Phagocytic Cells in Planarians. Curr Biol. 2018;28(23):3787–801 e6. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Baguñà J, Saló E, Auladell C. Regeneration and pattern formation in planarians. III. Evidence that neoblasts are totipotent stem cells and the source of blastema cells. Development. 1989;107:77–86. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Newmark P, Sánchez Alvarado A. Bromodeoxyuridine specifically labels the regenerative stem cells of planarians. Dev Biol. 2000;220(2):142–53. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Reddien PW, Oviedo NJ, Jennings JR, Jenkin JC, Sánchez Alvarado A. SMEDWI-2 is a PIWI-like protein that regulates planarian stem cells. Science. 2005;310:1327–30. 10.1126/science.1116110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Eisenhoffer GT, Kang H, Sánchez Alvarado A. Molecular analysis of stem cells and their descendants during cell turnover and regeneration in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(3):327–39. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bardeen CR, Baetjer FH. The inhibitive action of the Roentgen rays on regeneration in planarians. J Exp Zool. 1904;1:191–5. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dubois F. Démostration de la migration des cellules de régénération des planaries par le méthode des greffes et des irradiations combinées. Séance. 1948:1316–8. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hayashi T, Motoishi M, Yazawa S, Itomi K, Tanegashima C, Nishimura O, et al. A LIM-homeobox gene is required for differentiation of Wnt-expressing cells at the posterior end of the planarian body. Development. 2011;138(17):3679–88. 10.1242/dev.060194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schad EG, Petersen CP. STRIPAK Limits Stem Cell Differentiation of a WNT Signaling Center to Control Planarian Axis Scaling. Curr Biol. 2020;30(2):254–63 e2. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wurtzel O, Oderberg IM, Reddien PW. Planarian Epidermal Stem Cells Respond to Positional Cues to Promote Cell-Type Diversity. Dev Cell. 2017;40(5):491–504 e5. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rink JC, Gurley KA, Elliott SA, Sánchez Alvarado A. Planarian Hh signaling regulates regeneration polarity and links Hh pathway evolution to cilia. Science. 2009;326(5958):1406–10. 10.1126/science.1178712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yazawa S, Umesono Y, Hayashi T, Tarui H, Agata K. Planarian Hedgehog/Patched establishes anterior-posterior polarity by regulating Wnt signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(52):22329–34. 10.1073/pnas.0907464106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Glazer AM, Wilkinson AW, Backer CB, Lapan SW, Gutzman JH, Cheeseman IM, et al. The Zn finger protein Iguana impacts Hedgehog signaling by promoting ciliogenesis. Dev Biol. 2010;337(1):148–56. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.DeRobertis E, Sasai Y. A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature. 1996;380(6569):37–40. 10.1038/380037a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Orii H, Watanabe K. Bone morphogenetic protein is required for dorso-ventral patterning in the planarian Dugesia japonica. Dev Growth Differ. 2007;49(4):345–9. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2007.00931.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Molina MD, Saló E, Cebria F. The BMP pathway is essential for re-specification and maintenance of the dorsoventral axis in regenerating and intact planarians. Dev Biol. 2007;311(1):79–94. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Reddien PW, Bermange AL, Kicza AM, Sánchez Alvarado A. BMP signaling regulates the dorsal planarian midline and is needed for asymmetric regeneration. Development. 2007;134(22):4043–51. 10.1242/dev.007138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Erter CE, Solnica-Krezel L, Wright CV. Zebrafish nodal-related 2 encodes an early mesendodermal inducer signaling from the extraembryonic yolk syncytial layer. Dev Biol. 1998;204(2):361–72. 10.1006/dbio.1998.9097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Agius E, Oelgeschlager M, Wessely O, Kemp C, De Robertis EM. Endodermal Nodal-related signals and mesoderm induction in Xenopus. Development. 2000;127(6):1173–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Burdine RD, Schier AF. Conserved and divergent mechanisms in left-right axis formation. Genes Dev. 2000;14(7):763–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hamada H, Meno C, Watanabe D, Saijoh Y. Establishment of vertebrate left-right asymmetry. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(2):103–13. 10.1038/nrg732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nonaka S, Shiratori H, Saijoh Y, Hamada H. Determination of left-right patterning of the mouse embryo by artificial nodal flow. Nature. 2002;418(6893):96–9. 10.1038/nature00849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schier AF. Nodal signaling in vertebrate development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:589–621. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.041603.094522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Peterson AJ, O’Connor MB. Strategies for exploring TGF-beta signaling in Drosophila. Methods. 2014;68(1):183–93. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Munz B, Smola H, Engelhardt F, Bleuel K, Brauchle M, Lein I, et al. Overexpression of activin A in the skin of transgenic mice reveals new activities of activin in epidermal morphogenesis, dermal fibrosis and wound repair. EMBO J. 1999;18(19):5205–15. 10.1093/emboj/18.19.5205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wankell M, Munz B, Hubner G, Hans W, Wolf E, Goppelt A, et al. Impaired wound healing in transgenic mice overexpressing the activin antagonist follistatin in the epidermis. EMBO J. 2001;20(19):5361–72. 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bryant DM, Johnson K, DiTommaso T, Tickle T, Couger MB, Payzin-Dogru D, et al. A Tissue-Mapped Axolotl De Novo Transcriptome Enables Identification of Limb Regeneration Factors. Cell Rep. 2017;18(3):762–76. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Weiss J, Harris PE, Halvorson LM, Crowley WF, Jr., Jameson JL. Dynamic regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone-beta messenger ribonucleic acid levels by activin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in perifused rat pituitary cells. Endocrinology. 1992;131(3):1403–8. 10.1210/endo.131.3.1505470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vassalli A, Matzuk MM, Gardner HA, Lee KF, Jaenisch R. Activin/inhibin beta B subunit gene disruption leads to defects in eyelid development and female reproduction. Genes Dev. 1994;8(4):414–27. 10.1101/gad.8.4.414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Xia Y, Schneyer AL. The biology of activin: recent advances in structure, regulation and function. J Endocrinol. 2009;202(1):1–12. 10.1677/JOE-08-0549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pearson BJ, Eisenhoffer GT, Gurley KA, Rink JC, Miller DE, Sánchez Alvarado A. Formaldehyde-based whole-mount in situ hybridization method for planarians. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(2):443–50. 10.1002/dvdy.21849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]