Abstract
Background
Infantile inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is rare and the majority are driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. Previous literature on the use of ALK inhibitors in paediatric IMTs is extremely limited with no published literature on the use in infants. Crizotinib and ceritinib are two ALK inhibitors which are available and have been used in IMTs; however, ceritinib is much more affordable in the low- and middle-income country (LMIC) setting than crizotinib.
Case
An 11-month-old child, who had undergone surgery for mesenteric IMT at the age of 3 months, had an unresectable recurrence with soft tissue deposits in the subdiaphragmatic location abutting the spleen and paravesical location. As surgery would have entailed splenectomy and partial cystectomy, she was treated with low-dose ceritinib (300 mg/m2/day) with which she had a near-complete response without any toxicity.
Discussion and conclusion
This is the first report of the use of ceritinib at a lower dose for infantile IMT having immense practical applications for the low- and middle-income setting.
Keywords: ceritinib, infant, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, low dose
Introduction
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMTs) are considered to be potentially malignant tumours with a propensity for local recurrence and rarely metastasis [1, 2]. With increasing expertise in diagnosis, they have been described in almost all anatomical locations and in all age groups [3, 4]. Presentation in infancy is rare with description limited to small case series and case reports [3, 5–9]. Histologically, IMTs are characterised by a variably cellular spindle cell proliferation in a myxoid to collagenous stromal background with the predominance of inflammatory cells. Histology rarely correlates with prognosis, except for the rare aggressive epithelioid variant [3, 10]. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is non-specific [3, 10]. The need for an experienced sarcoma pathologist for correct diagnosis cannot be overemphasised.
Surgery remains the treatment of choice for the localised disease [11, 12]. With the discovery of targetable alterations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene seen in around 50% of the cases of IMTs, precision oncology has come to the forefront of the management of IMTs. Crizotinib is now the standard of care in adult unresectable ALK-positive IMTs (defined as the presence of ALK rearrangement in >15% of tumour cells by dual probe break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or staining by IHC) [13]. However, literature on the use of ALK inhibitors in paediatric patients is limited. Only four infants have been treated with ALK inhibitors so far (all crizotinib), with three having a favourable response [10, 14]. However, crizotinib is expensive in India and is unaffordable for most patients, whereas generic ceritinib is easily available and much more affordable. Here, we report the first ever case of an infant girl child with recurrent ALK-positive IMT who had a near-complete response to low-dose ceritinib.
Results
A 3-month-old female with an uncomplicated childbirth presented with a gradually progressive abdominal distension without any change in bowel habit or constitutional symptoms. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis showed a large ill-defined homogenous hypodense lesion of size 8.4 × 11.4 × 11.3 cm (APxTRAxSag), predominantly on the right side of the abdomen and in the midline showing mild heterogeneous post-contrast enhancement on delayed images (at 5 minutes) (Figure 1a and b). These findings were suggestive of a mesenteric mass, likely malignant. She underwent exploratory laparotomy with gross total excision of the mass and resection anastomosis of the involved small bowel. Histopathology showed a spindle cell tumour with cells arranged in a fascicular and haphazard pattern with abundant admixture of inflammatory cells rich in plasma cells, lymphocytes and few oeosinophils. The tumour cells showed mild-to-moderate pleomorphism with finely dispersed chromatin and moderate-to-abundant oeosinophilic cytoplasm. Variable mitosis was seen (4–5/10 per high-power field) (Figure 2a and b). Tumour cells showed diffuse nuclear immunoreactivity for ALK-1 protein (100%) on D5F3 Ventana platform and cytoplasmic positivity for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and desmin (Figure 2c and d). Hence, a diagnosis of infantile IMT was suggested. She developed abdominal pain 6 months after surgery and imaging (CECT) showed recurrent disease in right paravesical and left subdiaphragmatic regions (Figure 1e and f). As resection would have required debilitating surgery in the form of splenectomy and partial cystectomy, she was started on ceritinib 150 mg once a day (300 mg/m2) with food (the child was able to swallow the capsule), after discussion with the multidisciplinary tumour board. The child was monitored for toxicity with two weekly complete blood counts, liver and renal function tests for the first month, followed by monthly liver function testing. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained prior to starting ceritinib, at 2 weeks of starting treatment and then monthly. Response assessment after 2 months showed a near-complete response with the disappearance of the paravesical lesion and 95% reduction of the subdiaphragmatic lesion (Figure 1g and h). A follow-up scan at 6 months of starting ceritinib showed complete response to therapy with no toxicity.
Discussion
Prior to the discovery of the ALK gene rearrangements by Griffin et al [15] in 1999, the biology of IMTs was an enigma. Since then, studies in adult patients have showed that up to 50% of the patients harbour rearrangements in the ALK gene detected by either FISH or IHC, leading to constitutive activation of receptor tyrosine kinase and tumourigenesis [16]. Although EML4–ALK (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4–ALK) fusions are most commonly seen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a set of unique translocations involving ALK has been described in IMT, including RANBP2–ALK (RAN binding protein 2–ALK) and CARS–ALK (cysteinyl t-RNA synthetase–ALK), which are not found in other tumours [17, 18]. With advances in molecular pathology, additional abnormalities have been characterised in IMTs, including ROS1, RET (rearrange during transfection) and NTRK (neurorophic tropomyosin receptor kinase) gene fusions [8, 10, 18]. In a recent case series of 62 cases of IMT, 35 patients (56%) were positive for ALK, 6 patients (10%) were positive for ROS1 and 1 patient had RET gene arrangement [19]. Out of these, ROS1 gene rearrangements were particularly more common in children (5/6 ROS1-positive cases were children). Majority of fusion-negative IMTs (90%) were adults indicating a high prevalence of driver fusions in paediatric IMTs.
Efficacy of crizotinib in ALK-positive IMTs was reported by Butrynski et al [20]. Concrete evidence of the efficacy of crizotinib was provided by the CREATE trial, in which 50% of the patients with ALK-positive IMTs responded to crizotinib with a median duration of response of 9 months and 73% of the patients were progression-free at 1 year [13]. However, efficacy in the paediatric population was not established as experience with ALK inhibitors was limited to NSCLC and adult IMTs.
The first relatively large study to report the efficacy of crizotinib in paediatric IMTs was published in 2017, in which a 36% response rate in 14 children with metastatic/unresectable IMT was found [21]. The recommended phase II dose of crizotinib was 280 mg/m2 (double that of adult dose) [22]. In a phase I study of ceritinib in 22 ALK-positive paediatric tumours (six IMTs) presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2015, in children more than 1 year of age, the recommended maximum tolerated dose was 510 mg/m2 without food. However, the median age in this study was 10 years (no infants were recruited) and toxicities were significant (86% all grade diarrhoea, 81% all grade vomiting, 54% elevated alanine transaminase and 40% decreased appetite) [23]. Brivio and Zwaan [24] demonstrated excellent responses to ceritinib in adolescent IMTs in their two cases; they used lower doses of 300 mg/m2 and 450 mg/m2. The manuscript did not mention whether ceritinib was given with food or empty stomach and although both patients responded, the one treated with 450 mg/m2 developed acute liver failure related to ceritinib [24]. This provided preliminary evidence of the efficacy of a lower dose of ceritinib in paediatric IMTs. Based on this evidence and previous data of lower dose ceritinib in NSCLC [25, 26], we treated our patient with 300 mg/m2/day ceritinib taken with low fat meal (150 mg/day) – similar to the adult dose of 450 mg/day. Had we used crizotinib at its recommended dose, the cost of therapy would have been around Rs. 40,000 ($550) per month, which would have been unaffordable for our patient. With this approach, we were able to cut down the cost by one-fifth to Rs. 8000/month ($110). She had improvement in symptoms within 2 weeks of starting therapy and a near-complete response in 2 months with no toxicity, thus showing promising efficacy of a lower dose of ceritinib. Based on previous published data in NSCLC and our experience, we believe that low-dose ceritinib is an excellent cost-effective alternative to crizotinib which needs to be explored further in larger studies, especially in an LMIC setting.
Conclusion
With advancements in molecular pathology, precision oncology is the future to managing this very rare tumour. Published data describe the efficacy of ALK inhibitors predominantly in adults. Recommended doses in children seem higher than required for optimal response with unwanted toxicity and cost. This is the first case to describe complete response to ceritinib in infantile IMTs at a lower than recommended dose and has immense practical implications, especially for LMICs.
Abbreviations
IMT, Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour; ALK, Anaplastic lymphoma kinase; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; SMA, Smooth muscle actin; FISH, Fluorescence in situ hybridisation; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer; LMIC, Low- and middle-income country
Consent
Taken from parents.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Acknowledgments and funding
None.
References
- 1.Brunn H. Two interesting benign lung tumors of contradictory histopathology. J Thorac Surg. 1939;9:119–131. doi: 10.1016/S0096-5588(20)32030-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meis JM, Enzinger FM. Inflammatory fibrosarcoma of the mesentery and retroperitoneum. A tumor closely simulating inflammatory pseudotumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:1146–1156. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199112000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, et al. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(8):859–872. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199508000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cook JR, Dehner LP, Collins MH, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression in the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a comparative immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;25:1364–1371. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200111000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gonzalez-Crussi F, deMello DE, Sotelo-Avila C. Omental mesenteric myxoid hamartomas. Infantile lesions simulating malignant tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983;7:567–578. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198309000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hill KA, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Chou PM. Calcifying fibrous pseudotumor versus inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a histological and immunohistochemical comparison. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:784–790. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saab ST, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD, et al. IgG4 plasma cells in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: inflammatory marker or pathogenic link? Mod Pathol. 2011;24:606–612. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamamoto H, Yoshida A, Taguchi K, et al. ALK, ROS1 and NTRK3 gene rearrangements in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. Histopathology. 2016;69:72–83. doi: 10.1111/his.12910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tanaka M, Kohashi K, Kushitani K, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the lung carrying a chimeric A2M-ALK gene: report of 2 infantile cases and review of the differential diagnosis of infantile pulmonary lesions. Hum Pathol. 2017;66:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lopez-Nunez O, John I, Panasiti RN, et al. Infantile inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors: clinicopathological and molecular characterization of 12 cases. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(4):576–590. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0406-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ray A, Suri JC, Bhattacharya D, et al. Bronchoscopic resection of endobronchial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Lung India. 2014;31(2):172–175. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.129866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maturu VN, Bal A, Singh N. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung in pregnancy mimicking carcinoid tumor. Lung India. 2016;33(1):82–84. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.173058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caporalini C, Moscardi S, Tamburini A, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the tongue. Report of a pediatric case and review of the literature. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2018;37:117–125. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2017.1385667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schöffski P, Sufliarsky J, Gelderblom H, et al. Crizotinib in patients with advanced, inoperable inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours with and without anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene alterations (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 90101 CREATE): a multicentre, single-drug, prospective, non-randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(6):431–441. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30116-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Griffin CA, Hawkins AL, Dvorak C, et al. Recurrent involvement of 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Cancer Res. 1999;59(12):2776–2780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coffin CM, Patel A, Perkins S, et al. ALK1 and p80 expression and chromosomal rearrangements involving 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:569–576. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Debelenko LV, Arthur DC, Pack SD, et al. Identification of CARS-ALK fusion in primary and metastatic lesions of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Lab Invest. 2003;83(9):1255–1265. doi: 10.1097/01.LAB.0000088856.49388.EA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ma Z, Hill DA, Collins MH, et al. Fusion of ALK to the Ran-binding protein 2 (RANBP2) gene in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003;37(1):98–105. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antonescu CR, Suurmeijer AJ, Zhang L, et al. Molecular characterization of inflammatory myofibroblastictumors with frequent ALK and ROS1 gene fusions and rare novel RET rearrangement. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(7):957–967. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Butrynski JE, D’Adamo DR, Hornick JL, et al. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1727–1733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mossé YP, Voss SD, Lim MS, et al. Targeting ALK with crizotinib in pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(28):3215–3221. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.4830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moss´e YP, Lim MS, Voss SD, et al. Safety and activity of crizotinib for paediatric patients with refractory solid tumours or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: a Children’s Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:472–480. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70095-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Geoerger β, Schulte J, Zwaan CM, et al. Phase I study of ceritinib in pediatric patients (Pts) with malignancies harboring a genetic alteration in ALK (ALK+): safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy results. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:10005. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.10005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brivio E, Zwaan CM. ALK inhibition in two emblematic cases of pediatric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: efficacy and side effects. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(5):e27645. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, et al. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1189–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cho BC, Kim DW, Bearz A, et al. ASCEND-8: a randomized phase 1 study of ceritinib, 450 mg or 600 mg, taken with a low-Fat Meal versus 750 mg in fasted state in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(9):1357–1367. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]