Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021 Feb 23;39:127873. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.127873

Design, synthesis, and evaluation of transition-state analogs as inhibitors of the bacterial quorum sensing autoinducer synthase CepI

Erin L Higgins 1,ǂ,a, Julian S Kellner-Rogers 1,ǂ,b, Alexandra M Estanislau 1,c, Alec C Esposito 1,d, Nora R Vail 1,e, Sterling R Payne 1,f, Julia G Stockwell 1, Scott M Ulrich 1,*
PMCID: PMC8058303  NIHMSID: NIHMS1678612  PMID: 33631369

Abstract

Quorum sensing is a bacterial signaling system that involves the synthesis, secretion and detection of signal molecules called autoinducers. The main autoinducer in Gram-negative bacteria are acylated homoserine lactones, produced by the LuxI family of autoinducer synthases and detected by the LuxR family of autoinducer receptors. Quorum sensing allows for changes in gene expression and bacterial behaviors in a coordinated, cell density dependent manner. Quorum sensing controls the expression of virulence factors in some human pathogens, making quorum sensing an antibacterial drug target. Here we describe the design and synthesis of transition-state analogs of the autoinducer synthase enzymatic reaction and the evaluation of these compounds as inhibitors of the synthase CepI. One such compound potently inhibits CepI and constitutes a new type of inhibitor against this underdeveloped antibacterial target.

Keywords: Quorum sensing, autoinducer synthase inhibitor, transition-state analog


Quorum sensing is a bacterial signaling system that functions through the production, secretion, and detection of small signal molecules called autoinducers (AI).13 As bacterial cell population increases, the concentration of autoinducer rises and engages its cognate receptor. The autoinducer-receptor complex acts as a transcriptional regulator allowing for coordinated changes in gene expression at high cell density. The main class of autoinducers in proteobacteria are acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs). The acyl group of AHL structures varies according to species, with lengths between 4 and 18 carbons and variable oxidation states at the beta position.4 AHLs are produced by the LuxI family of AHL synthases and are detected by the LuxR family of AHL receptors, named after the AI synthase/receptor pair of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri, whose lux bioluminescence operon is controlled by quorum sensing (Figure 1).5

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Left: Autoinducer synthases produce AI signal molecules which accumulate in the environment at levels proportional to bacterial cell density. At a threshold concentration, the autoinducers bind their receptors which induces DNA binding and transcription of genes controlled by quorum sensing. Right: Structures of AHL autoinducers from various bacterial species.

Quorum sensing has been shown to control expression of virulence factors in bacteria that are human pathogens.6 A well-studied example is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a cause of acute and persistent infections in burn victims, cystic fibrosis patients, and a prominent hospital-acquired infection.7 Pseudomonas aeruginosa has two AHL synthase/receptor quorum sensing systems, LasI/LasR and RhlI/RhlR, which control expression of its pathogenic phenotypes.8 These include biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, motility, and production of the rhamnolipid surfactant, which correlates with disease progression in cystic fibrosis patients.9

Small-molecule inhibition of quorum sensing is an active area of medicinal chemistry research to find drugs to suppress expression of virulence factors that are under quorum sensing control.10,11 Numerous potent AHL receptor antagonists that block signal detection have been developed.12,13 Some receptor antagonists have been shown to suppress virulence and improve host outcomes in infection models, validating quorum sensing as an antibacterial drug target.1417

An alternative approach to block AHL quorum sensing is to inhibit the AHL synthase enzyme and signal production. Synthases catalyze acyl group transfer from acylated acyl carrier protein (acyl-ACP) to the amino group of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). The enzyme subsequently catalyzes an intramolecular SN2 lactonization, releasing S-methyl thioadenosine (MTA) and the AHL autoinducer (Figure 2).18,19

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The enzymatic reaction of AHL synthases.

In contrast to the extensive work on AHL receptor antagonists, few AHL synthase inhibitors have been discovered. These can be divided into three classes. First, several inhibitors are autoinducer analogs. These include J8-C8, an acyl-aminocyclohexenone which was co-crystallized with its target TofI along with MTA, the AHL synthase byproduct.20 AHL analogs with unnatural (R) stereochemistry and long acyl tails have been shown to inhibit the AHL synthase RhlI.21 It was proposed that these compounds bind a cryptic pocket on the synthase. Second, bisubstrate analogs with adenosyl and acyl tail moieties joined by linker groups have been shown to be inhibitors of the synthase TofI.22 These molecules were also attached to beads and used as affinity reagents for AHL synthase enzymes. Finally, some AHL synthase inhibitors bear no structural resemblance to any molecule along the synthase reaction coordinate. These include N-hydroxyindole derivatives as inhibitors of AHL synthases BmaI1 and YspI discovered in a novel high-throughput screening assay23, and substituted diketopiperazines as inhibitors of the AHL synthase CepI.24

Our approach to develop inhibitors of AHL synthase enzymes was to design transition state analogs of the lactonization step of the enzymatic reaction. The theory of tight binding between enzymes and transition state analogs is well-established and has guided the design of many inhibitors.25,26 The lactonization step of this reaction is particularly amenable to the design of transition state mimics. It is a 5-exo-tet cyclization, with the carboxylate displacing the sulfonium group. We designed transition state analogs to capture the cyclic nature of the closing lactone ring, the lengthening of the C-S bond as MTA departs, and the neutralization of the carboxylate and sulfonium charges (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Lactonization transition state of AHL synthases.

We designed a set of lactonization transition state analogs with lactone, cyclopentyl, and thiazole rings to mimic the nascent lactone of the enzymatic reaction and provide diversity in ring geometry. The rings were joined to adenosine by thioether or amide linkages to mimic the lengthening bond between the lactone ring and departing MTA. The two linker types allow some diversity of the polarity and degree of conformational freedom of this linker. The lactone, cyclopentyl, and thiazole rings all contain an exocyclic amine acylated with an octanoyl group, matching the acyl tail that our target enzyme CepI incorporates into its AHL product. We also made the corresponding acyclic amide and thioether (which was previously shown to inhibit the synthase TofI)22 as control compounds (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Analogs of the lactonization transition state as target structures for AHL synthase inhibitors.

The thioether compounds JKR-1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 were all prepared from 5’ thioacetyladenosine acetal, prepared by Mitsunobu reaction of protected adenosine and thioacetic acid.27 The 5’ thiol was liberated by basic methanolysis and coupled to suitable halides (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

General synthesis of thioether analogs by coupling alkyl halides with 5’ thioacetyl adenosine acetal.

The bromides leading to JKR-1 and compound 2 were prepared from (S) or (R) Boc-allylglycine28 which undergo diastereoselective bromolactonization with NBS.29 The Boc-bromolactone was deprotected, acylated with octanoyl chloride then coupled to thioadenosine. The synthesis of cyclopentyl analog 3 began with commercially available (1S,3R)-Boc-3-aminocyclopentane carboxylic acid which was similarly deprotected and acylated with octanoyl chloride. The acid was esterified and subsequently reduced with methanolic LiBH430 and brominated under Appel conditions before coupling to thioadenosine. The synthesis of thiazole analog 5 began with acylation of thiourea,31 cyclization with 1,3 dichloroacetone32 followed by coupling with thioadenosine. The linear analog 7 is a known compound and was prepared by the published sequence (Scheme 2).22

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of halides for the lactone JKR-1, lactone 2, cyclopentyl 3, thiazole 5, and acyclic thioether 7 transition-state mimics.

The amide-linked analogs 4, 6 and 8 were all prepared by EDC coupling of appropriate carboxylic acids with 5’ aminoadenosine acetonide (Scheme 3).33

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

General synthesis of amide-linked analogs by coupling carboxylic acids with 5’ aminoadenosine acetonide.

The carboxylic acid of the thiazole analog 4 was prepared by acylation of ethyl aminothiazole carboxylate with octanoyl chloride followed by ester hydrolysis. The synthesis of cyclopentyl analog 6 was prepared from the carboxylic acid shown in Scheme 2. The linear amide-linked analog 8 was prepared from bromovaleric acid by treatment with sodium azide, reduction to the amine, and subsequent acylation with octanoyl chloride (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Synthesis of carboxylic acids for cyclopentyl 4, thiazole 6, and linear 8 amide-linked transition-state mimics.

We tested these transition state mimics as inhibitors of CepI, the autoinducer synthase from Burkolderia cenocepecia.34 We screened all compounds in Figure 4 against CepI at 100 μM using the standard DCPIP assay to detect liberated ACP thiol, with 500 μM SAM and 15 μM octanoyl ACP. We found that JKR-1 and compound 2, the two lactone-based structures, showed inhibition of CepI under these conditions (Figure 5A). We then titrated both these compounds against CepI under the same assay conditions and found that JKR-1 has an IC50 of 1.0 ± 0.3 μM and 2 has an IC50 of ~100 μM (Figure 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A) Assay of each compound at 100 μM for CepI inhibition. B) Titration of JKR-1 and compound 2 against CepI.

We sought additional independent evidence that JKR-1 binds to CepI. One method to do so is to measure if a protein’s susceptibility to proteolysis is altered by ligand binding. Indeed, we observed that addition of JKR-1 protected CepI from proteolysis by trypsin (Figure 6A). We tested whether JKR-1 inhibits trypsin itself using a standard colorimetric trypsin assay and confirmed that it does not (Figure 6B). The suppression of CepI proteolysis by trypsin conferred by JKR-1 suggests that JKR-1 binds CepI and affects its structure.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A) Proteolytic digestion of CepI (5 μM) with Trypsin (0.1 μM) for 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 min in the presence or absence of JKR-1 (50 μM). B) Trypsin (1 μg mL−1) assay with the colorimetric substrate Bz-Arg-pNA in the presence and absence of 50 μM JKR-1.

JKR-1 is a new, potent inhibitor of the quorum sensing autoinducer synthase enzyme CepI. Among the set of molecules described here, JKR-1 is the closest mimic of the “late” lactonization transition state: where the lactone ring is formed, MTA is departing, and the carboxylate and sulfonium charges are neutralized. JKR-1 shares the same (S) stereochemistry at the amino group position as the SAM substrate, which may be why it proved to be a more potent inhibitor than its stereoisomer 2.

It is unclear why JKR-1 showed inhibition of CepI while other closely related molecules (notably compound 3) did not. The crystal structure of the AHL synthase TofI bound to the autoinducer analog J8C8 and reaction byproduct MTA shows that there are distinct binding pockets for the SAM and acyl-ACP substrates.20 These two pockets join at a junction where both the acyl transfer and lactonization chemical steps occur (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

X-ray crystal structure (from reference 20, PDB ID 3P2H) of the synthase TofI bound to MTA which occupies the adenosyl pocket (left) and the autoinducer analog J8C8 which occupies the acyl pocket (right).

Our transition state analog JKR-1 contains both adenosyl and acyl groups, therefore it likely binds both the adenosyl and acyl tail pockets through this junction. The remainder of the compounds reported here may have failed to inhibit CepI if there is a strict geometric requirement to link both pockets through this junction. JKR-1 may thus add key information on how to effectively do so. This information may help lead to potent, cell permeable AHL synthase inhibitors that are useful to block quorum sensing behaviors in bacteria, and ultimately test whether such inhibition mitigates bacterial infections in model systems.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R15GM131316 awarded to SMU. We thank the Ithaca College Humanities and Sciences Summer Scholars program for funding undergraduate summer internships to E.L.H., N.R.V., J.S.K-R., A.C.E., and J.G.S. We thank Chun Li for her help with instrumentation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • (1).Waters CM; Bassler BL Quorum Sensing: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2005, 21, 319–346. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Papenfort K; Bassler BL Quorum Sensing Signal-Response Systems in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2016, 14 (9), 576–588. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Whiteley M; Diggle SP; Greenberg EP Progress in and Promise of Bacterial Quorum Sensing Research. Nature 2017, 551 (7680), 313–320. 10.1038/nature24624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Fuqua C; Greenberg EP Self Perception in Bacteria: Quorum Sensing with Acylated Homoserine Lactones. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 1998, 1 (2), 183–189. 10.1016/s1369-5274(98)80009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Dunlap PV Quorum Regulation of Luminescence in Vibrio Fischeri. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1999, 1 (1), 5–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Winzer K; Williams P Quorum Sensing and the Regulation of Virulence Gene Expression in Pathogenic Bacteria. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. IJMM 2001, 291 (2), 131–143. 10.1078/1438-4221-00110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Sadikot RT; Blackwell TS; Christman JW; Prince AS Pathogen-Host Interactions in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 2005, 171 (11), 1209–1223. 10.1164/rccm.200408-1044SO. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Passador L; Cook JM; Gambello MJ; Rust L; Iglewski BH Expression of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Virulence Genes Requires Cell-to-Cell Communication. Science 1993, 260 (5111), 1127–1130. 10.1126/science.8493556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Sawa T; Shimizu M; Moriyama K; Wiener-Kronish JP Association between Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Type III Secretion, Antibiotic Resistance, and Clinical Outcome: A Review. Crit. Care Lond. Engl 2014, 18 (6), 668. 10.1186/s13054-014-0668-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).LaSarre B; Federle MJ Exploiting Quorum Sensing to Confuse Bacterial Pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR 2013, 77 (1), 73–111. 10.1128/MMBR.00046-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Njoroge J; Sperandio V Jamming Bacterial Communication: New Approaches for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases. EMBO Mol. Med 2009, 1 (4), 201–210. 10.1002/emmm.200900032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Welsh MA; Blackwell HE Chemical Probes of Quorum Sensing: From Compound Development to Biological Discovery. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 2016, 40 (5), 774–794. 10.1093/femsre/fuw009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Geske GD; O’Neill JC; Blackwell HE Expanding Dialogues: From Natural Autoinducers to Non-Natural Analogues That Modulate Quorum Sensing in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev 2008, 37 (7), 1432–1447. 10.1039/b703021p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Swem LR; Swem DL; O’Loughlin CT; Gatmaitan R; Zhao B; Ulrich SM; Bassler BL A Quorum-Sensing Antagonist Targets Both Membrane-Bound and Cytoplasmic Receptors and Controls Bacterial Pathogenicity. Mol. Cell 2009, 35 (2), 143–153. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Welsh MA; Eibergen NR; Moore JD; Blackwell HE Small Molecule Disruption of Quorum Sensing Cross-Regulation in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Causes Major and Unexpected Alterations to Virulence Phenotypes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137 (4), 1510–1519. 10.1021/ja5110798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).O’Loughlin CT; Miller LC; Siryaporn A; Drescher K; Semmelhack MF; Bassler BL A Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor Blocks Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Virulence and Biofilm Formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2013, 110 (44), 17981–17986. 10.1073/pnas.1316981110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Fong J; Zhang C; Yang R; Boo ZZ; Tan SK; Nielsen TE; Givskov M; Liu X-W; Bin W; Su H; Yang L Combination Therapy Strategy of Quorum Quenching Enzyme and Quorum Sensing Inhibitor in Suppressing Multiple Quorum Sensing Pathways of P. Aeruginosa. Sci. Rep 2018, 8 (1), 1155. 10.1038/s41598-018-19504-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Raychaudhuri A; Jerga A; Tipton PA Chemical Mechanism and Substrate Specificity of RhlI, an Acylhomoserine Lactone Synthase from Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Biochemistry 2005, 44 (8), 2974–2981. 10.1021/bi048005m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Dong S-H; Frane ND; Christensen QH; Greenberg EP; Nagarajan R; Nair SK Molecular Basis for the Substrate Specificity of Quorum Signal Synthases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2017, 114 (34), 9092–9097. 10.1073/pnas.1705400114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Chung J; Goo E; Yu S; Choi O; Lee J; Kim J; Kim H; Igarashi J; Suga H; Moon JS; Hwang I; Rhee S Small-Molecule Inhibitor Binding to an N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2011, 108 (29), 12089–12094. 10.1073/pnas.1103165108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Shin D; Gorgulla C; Boursier ME; Rexrode N; Brown EC; Arthanari H; Blackwell HE; Nagarajan R N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Analog Modulators of the Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Rhll Quorum Sensing Signal Synthase. ACS Chem. Biol 2019, 14 (10), 2305–2314. 10.1021/acschembio.9b00671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Kai K; Fujii H; Ikenaka R; Akagawa M; Hayashi H An Acyl-SAM Analog as an Affinity Ligand for Identifying Quorum Sensing Signal Synthases. Chem. Commun. Camb. Engl 2014, 50 (62), 8586–8589. 10.1039/c4cc03094j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Christensen QH; Grove TL; Booker SJ; Greenberg EP A High-Throughput Screen for Quorum-Sensing Inhibitors That Target Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Synthases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2013, 110 (34), 13815–13820. 10.1073/pnas.1313098110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Scoffone VC; Chiarelli LR; Makarov V; Brackman G; Israyilova A; Azzalin A; Forneris F; Riabova O; Savina S; Coenye T; Riccardi G; Buroni S Discovery of New Diketopiperazines Inhibiting Burkholderia Cenocepacia Quorum Sensing in Vitro and in Vivo. Sci. Rep 2016, 6, 32487. 10.1038/srep32487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Schramm VL Enzymatic Transition States and Drug Design. Chem. Rev 2018, 118 (22), 11194–11258. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Schramm VL Transition States, Analogues, and Drug Development. ACS Chem. Biol 2013, 8 (1), 71–81. 10.1021/cb300631k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Pignot M; Pljevaljcic G; Weinhold E Efficient Synthesis of S-Adenosyl-L-Homocysteine Natural Product Analogues and Their Use to Elucidate the Structural Determinant for Cofactor Binding of the DNA Methyltransferase M·HhaI. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2000, 2000 (3), 549–555. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).ASYMMETRIC SYNTHESIS OF A-AMINO ACIDS BY THE ALKYLATION OF PSEUDOEPHEDRINE GLYCINAMIDE: L-ALLYLGLYCINE AND N-BOC-L-ALLYLGLYCINE. Org. Synth 1999, 76, 57. 10.15227/orgsyn.076.0057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Kurokawa N; Ohfune Y Total Synthesis of Echinocandins. I. Stereocontrolled Syntheses of the Constituent Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1986, 108 (19), 6041–6043. 10.1021/ja00279a064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Soai K; Ookawa A Mixed solvents containing methanol as useful reaction media for unique chemoselective reductions within lithium borohydride https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jo00371a017 (accessed Sep 3, 2020). 10.1021/jo00371a017. [DOI]
  • (31).Rutaganira FU; Fowler ML; McPhail JA; Gelman MA; Nguyen K; Xiong A; Dornan GL; Tavshanjian B; Glenn JS; Shokat KM; Burke JE Design and Structural Characterization of Potent and Selective Inhibitors of Phosphatidylinositol 4 Kinase IIIβ. J. Med. Chem 2016, 59 (5), 1830–1839. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Dayam R; Grande F; Al-Mawsawi LQ; Neamati N Recent Advances in the Design and Discovery of Small-Molecule Therapeutics Targeting HER2/Neu. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat 2007, 17 (1), 83–102. [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Kolb M; Danzin C; Barth J; Claverie N Synthesis and Biochemical Properties of Chemically Stable Product Analogs of the Reaction Catalyzed by S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine Decarboxylase. J. Med. Chem 1982, 25 (5), 550–556. 10.1021/jm00347a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Lewenza S; Conway B; Greenberg EP; Sokol PA Quorum Sensing in Burkholderia Cepacia: Identification of the LuxRI Homologs CepRI. J. Bacteriol 1999, 181 (3), 748–756. 10.1128/JB.181.3.748-756.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES