Skip to main content
World Journal of Clinical Cases logoLink to World Journal of Clinical Cases
. 2021 Apr 26;9(12):2823–2829. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i12.2823

Laryngeal myxoma: A case report

Ting-Ting Yu 1, Hong Yu 2, Yu Cui 3, Wei Liu 4, Xiang-Yan Cui 5, Xin Wang 6
PMCID: PMC8058668  PMID: 33969065

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myxomas are benign tumors of mesenchymal origin that rarely occur in the larynx.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a case of a laryngeal myxoma that presented as a right vocal cord mass in a 54-year-old man.

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal myxoma is a rare benign tumor in the larynx. It is difficult to distinguish glottis myxoma from vocal cord polyps on laryngoscopy. We recommend that otolaryngologists acquire a better understanding of this disease. If a laryngeal myxoma is suspected, dynamic laryngoscopy, acoustic voice analysis, and pathological biopsy should be performed.

Keywords: Laryngeal myxoma, Mesenchymal, Glottis, Hoarseness, Dyspnea, Laryngoscopy, Case report


Core Tip: Laryngeal myxoma is a rare benign tumor in the larynx. It is difficult to distinguish glottis myxoma from vocal cord polyps on laryngoscopy. We recommend that otolaryngologists acquire a better understanding of this disease. If a laryngeal myxoma is suspected, dynamic laryngoscopy, acoustic voice analysis, and pathological biopsy should be performed.

INTRODUCTION

A myxoma is a benign mucinous tumor of mesenchymal origin. These tumors occur in the heart, bones, skin, subcutaneous and aponeurotic tissues, urogenital system, and skeletal muscles[1]. Myxomas can locally invade tissues despite their benign nature[2,3]. The term “myxoma” was first proposed by Virchow in 1871 and described as aggregation of a mucinous substance of the umbilical cord[4]. The diagnostic criteria for myxomas were refined by Stout in 1948 as “a true mesenchymal neoplasm consists of undifferentiated stellate cells in the loose myxoid stroma that do not metastasize”[5].

Myxomas can occur in the head and neck, especially the facial bones, such as the mandible and maxilla, with these locations accounting for 3%-6% of myxomas[6]. Laryngeal myxoma, however, is very rare, with only 22 cases reported in the English literature. The clinical presentations of laryngeal myxomas are highly similar to those of common benign laryngeal lesions such as laryngeal polyps, and thus, they are difficult to diagnose through physical examination.

Here, we report a case of laryngeal myxoma treated in our center. We also review and summarize the clinical characteristics of reported laryngeal myxomas to help clinicians obtain a better understanding of laryngeal myxomas and improve the diagnosis, treatment, and patients’ postoperative recovery.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 54-year-old man was admitted to the hospital because of progressive hoarseness and dyspnea. He had no cough, sputum, or sore throat.

History of present illness

He had a history of hoarseness lasting 7 years, which persisted and gradually worsened. The patient had been stable until 10 d earlier, when hoarseness significantly worsened and dyspnea presented. The patient was treated with penicillin at the local hospital, which provided no relief, then he was referred to our hospital.

History of past illness

The patient had a free previous medical history.

Physical examination

The patient presented with moderate inspiratory dyspnea; however, vital signs were stable. There were no other abnormal findings.

Laboratory examinations

The results of laboratory examinations were normal.

Imaging examinations

Laryngoscopy revealed a smooth laryngeal mass.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

After admission, the patient was diagnosed with throat obstruction, degree II dyspnea, a right vocal cord mass (myxoma), and mild anemia.

TREATMENT

We performed resection of the right vocal cord mass with the assistance of an endoscope.

During the operation, a smooth mass with a pedicle was observed on the front end of the right vocal cord, with a size of about 1.5 cm × 1.4 cm × 1 cm, without invasion of the vocal cord muscle (Figure 1). The tumor extended below the glottis, and the glottis was narrow. We removed the vocal cord mass completely without damaging the vocal ligament (Figure 2). Pathological examination (Figure 3) of the excised vocal cord mass showed that it was a mesenchymal tumor. The results of immunohistochemistry revealed that it was a myxoma. The tumor had no envelope and showed expansive growth. It was composed of well-differentiated phyllodes mucinous tumors separated by fibroid tissues. There was no obvious atypia, mitosis, or necrosis. Part of the epithelium was missing, and mucosal ulcers were formed (Figure 3A). The immunohistochemical results were as follows: Ki-67 (+ < 5%), calponin (-), cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) (+), CD34 (weak +), cytokeratin pan (-), desmin (-), neurofilament (-), S-100 (-), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (-) (Figure 3B). After the operation, the patient received budesonide inhalation suspension and supportive care.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preoperative laryngoscopic image. A smooth mass was seen on the left vocal cord with a broad base. The tumor was so large that it blocked the throat cavity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Intraoperative image. The multiple layers of the vocal folds remained intact after mass removal.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hematoxylin & eosin-stained histopathological image (40 ×). A: Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological image; B: Immunohistochemical staining of cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) (+) (10 ×); C: Immunohistochemical staining of CD31 (+) (20 ×); D: Immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 (+ < 5%) (20 ×). The tumor had no envelope and showed expansive growth. It was composed of well-differentiated phyllodes mucinous tumors separated by fibroid tissues. There was no obvious atypia, mitosis, or necrosis. Part of the epithelium was missing, and mucosal ulcers were formed. The immunohistochemical results were as follows: Ki-67 (+ < 5%), CD31 (+), and CD34 (weak +).

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The patient will be followed up every 3 mo and should be checked by laryngoscopy at each visit.

DISCUSSION

We searched the PubMed and Geenmedical databases using laryngeal myxoma as a keyword, and analyzed the search results (Table 1). All of the literature contained information about the patient’s medical history, symptoms, lesion location, pathological diagnosis, etc. A total of 24 cases have been reported in the literature or admitted to our center to date (Table 1). Among them, the incidence in men was higher than that in women (91.67% vs 8.33%). The average patient age was 53.29 years (range: 25-77 years). Tumors were commonly found in the glottis (79.17%), and most of them were unilateral. Therefore, hoarseness was the most common symptom. Most patients had a history of smoking. Myxomas in the supraglottic area were mostly larger than tumors in the glottal area, and there are two possible reasons. First, the small space in the glottis restricts tumor growth. Second, tumors in the glottis are prone to cause obvious symptoms, which prompts patients to see a doctor, leading to early detection. Due to the large space in the supraglottic area, myxomas in this area have no specific symptoms in the early stage. After the tumor grows, the patient may experience foreign body sensation during swallowing and snoring during sleep. The tumor is usually found during on physical examination by a doctor at this time. The clinical presentation of the present case is consistent with the above characteristics.

Table 1.

Systematic review of all cases of laryngeal myxoma

No. (yr)
Age (yr)
Sex
Site/side
Size (cm)
2 (1982) 30 M VC/R 0.75
25 F VC/L 1.5 × 0.75
1 (1986) 38 M E
1 (1991) 70 M AE 6.5 × 5.0 × 2.5
1 (1994) 64 M VC/L 1.0 × 0.6 × 0.2
1 (1997) 57 M VC/R 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7
1 (1997) 62 M VC/R 2.5 × 2.5 × 1.5
1 (1999) 42 M E
1 (2001) 57 M AE 6.5 × 5 × 1
1 (2005) 46 M VC/R 0.8
1 (2007) 53 M VC/R
1 (2008) 64 M VC/R 0.4
1 (2008) 48 F VC/L
1 (2014) 77 M VC/L 0.8 × 0.3 × 0.2
1 (2014) 65 M VC/R 1.7 × 1.2
1 (2015) 60 M VC/R
1 (2018) 53 M VC/R 0.5
1 (2018) 40 M AE/R 4.5 × 2 × 0.7
2 (2018) 44 M VC/R
77 M VC/L
3 (2019) 36 M VC 0.5-1
45 M VC/L 0.5-1
72 M VC/R 0.5-1
1 (case report) 54 M VC/L 1.5 × 1.4 × 1
Total: 24 Average: 53.29 F (8.33%), M (91.67%)

F: Female; M: Male; VC: Vocal cord; AE: Aryepiglottic fold; E: Epiglottis; R: Right; L: Left.

We summarize the characteristics of laryngeal myxomas in the glottis in Table 2. Among the 19 cases of laryngeal myxoma in the glottis, 11 occurred in the right vocal cord (57.89%), 7 in the left vocal cord (36.84%), and 1 in the anterior commissure of the larynx. There were 17 male patients (89.47%) and 2 female patients (10.53%). The tumor size ranged from 0.4-2.5 cm. Theoretically, breathing difficulties will occur if the maximum diameter of the tumor exceeds the front two-thirds of the vocal cords (1.4 cm in males and 1.0 cm in females). Other factors such as the location and texture of the tumor also affect the occurrence of laryngeal obstruction. A back location and dense texture are related to a higher risk of laryngeal obstruction. We found that very few reports provided the results for patient acoustic voice indicators. Only Imaizumi et al[7] reported the preoperative and postoperative dynamic laryngoscopic and voice analysis indicators. They found that the fundamental frequency, fundamental frequency perturbation (jitter), and amplitude perturbation (shimmer) of the vocal cord mucosa were significantly improved after surgical treatment, suggesting that surgery can effectively improve the voice quality of patients with a myxoma in the glottis. We propose that dynamic laryngoscopy and acoustic voice testing should be performed for patients with benign laryngeal tumors, as this information can not only help us make a differential diagnosis, but also evaluate the effect of surgery.

Table 2.

Systematic review of cases of laryngeal myxoma in the glottis

No. (yr)
Age (yr)
Sex
Site/side
Size (cm)
2 (1982) 30 M VC/R 0.75
25 F VC/L 1.5 × 0.75
1 (1994) 64 M VC/L 1.0 × 0.6 × 0.2
1 (1997) 57 M VC/R 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7
1 (1997) 62 M VC/R 2.5 × 2.5 × 1.5
1 (2005) 46 M VC/R 0.8
1 (2007) 53 M VC/R
1 (2008) 64 M VC/R 0.4
1 (2008) 48 F VC/L
1 (2014) 77 M VC/L 0.8 × 0.3 × 0.2
1 (2014) 65 M VC/R 1.7 × 1.2
1 (2015) 60 M VC/R
1 (2018) 53 M VC/R 0.5
2 (2018) 44 M VC/R
77 M VC/L
3 (2019) 36 M VC 0.5-1
45 M VC/L 0.5-1
72 M VC/R 0.5-1
1 (case report) 54 M VC/L 1.5 × 1.4 × 1
Total: 19 Average: 54.32 F (10.53%), M (89.47%)

F: Female; M: Male; VC: Vocal Cord; R: Right; L: Left.

The differential diagnoses of myxoma include myxoid liposarcoma, myxoid chondrosarcoma, and laryngeal polyp[8]. S-100 protein is indicative of lipoblasts and chondroblasts, while CD34 protein is commonly used as a marker for myxomas. The present case showed negative staining for S-100 and positive staining for CD34[9]. In summary, histopathological examination is the main method for the differential diagnosis of benign laryngeal tumors. When clinicians cannot differentiate and diagnose glottal benign tumors under laryngoscopy, a pathological biopsy is recommended to avoid misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis and reduce the tumor recurrence rate.

Laryngeal microsurgical resection is the first choice for the treatment of laryngeal myxoma[10]. It should be noted that during the operation, gross-total resection should be performed and the marginal tissue of the tumor should be removed to prevent recurrence. This is different from the recommendations for vocal cord polyp removal. Total resection of laryngeal myxoma is necessary to prevent recurrence[11]. Follow-up should be done within 3 years after surgery, because recurrence usually occurs within the first 3 years after surgery[12]. The present patient will be followed up closely.

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal myxoma is a rare benign tumor in the larynx. It is difficult to distinguish glottis myxoma from vocal cord polyps on laryngoscopy. We recommend that otolaryngologists acquire a better understanding of this disease. If a laryngeal myxoma is suspected, dynamic laryngoscopy, acoustic voice analysis, and pathological biopsy should be performed.

Footnotes

Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Peer-review started: October 19, 2020

First decision: December 30, 2020

Article in press: February 11, 2021

Specialty type: Otorhinolaryngology

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Grasso M S-Editor: Zhang H L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Yuan YY

Contributor Information

Ting-Ting Yu, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China.

Hong Yu, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China.

Yu Cui, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China.

Wei Liu, First Operation Room, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China.

Xiang-Yan Cui, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China. cuixiangyan19@126.com.

Xin Wang, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China.

References

  • 1.Kyriakos M. Tumor and tumor like conditions of the soft tissue. In: Kissane JH. Anderson's Pathology. 9th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby Co., 1990: 1896-1898. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andrews T, Kountakis SE, Maillard AA. Myxomas of the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol. 2000;21:184–189. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(00)85022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baheti AD, Tirumani SH, Rosenthal MH, Howard SA, Shinagare AB, Ramaiya NH, Jagannathan JP. Myxoid soft-tissue neoplasms: comprehensive update of the taxonomy and MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:374–385. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen KT, Ballecer RA. Laryngeal myxoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 1986;7:58–59. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(86)80036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ritchie A, Youngerman J, Fantasia JE, Kahn LB, Cocker RS. Laryngeal myxoma: a case report and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8:204–208. doi: 10.1007/s12105-013-0485-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Song YS, Jang SH, Min KW, Na W, Jang SM, Jun YJ, Paik SS. Myxoma of the larynx presenting as a nodule. Korean J Pathol . 2008;42:306–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Imaizumi M, Tada Y, Tani A, Ikeda M, Nakaegawa Y, Omori K. Two Cases of Laryngeal Myxoma Misdiagnosed as a Vocal Fold Polyp. J Otol Rhinol. 2018;7:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nakamura A, Iguchi H, Kusuki M, Yamane H, Matsuda M, Osako S. Laryngeal myxoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128:110–112. doi: 10.1080/00016480701361970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Idrees MT, Hessler R, Terris D, Mixson C, Wang BY. Unusual polypoid laryngeal myxoma. Mt Sinai J Med. 2005;72:282–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tang CG, Monin DL, Puligandla B, Cruz RM. Glottic myxoma presenting as chronic dysphonia: a case report and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2015;94:E30–E33. doi: 10.1177/014556131509400103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hadley J, Gardiner Q, Dilkes M, Boyle M. Myxoma of the larynx: a case report and a review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108:811–812. doi: 10.1017/s002221510012821x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sena T, Brady MS, Huvos AG, Spiro RH. Laryngeal myxoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:430–432. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870160084015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Clinical Cases are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES