Abstract
The microscopic environment inside a metazoan organism is highly crowded. Whether individual cells can tailor their behavior to the limited space remains unclear. Here, we found that cells measure the degree of spatial confinement using their largest and stiffest organelle, the nucleus. Cell confinement below a resting nucleus size deforms the nucleus, which expands and stretches its envelope. This activates signaling to the actomyosin cortex via nuclear envelope stretch-sensitive proteins, upregulating cell contractility. We established that the tailored contractile response constitutes a nuclear ruler-based signaling pathway involved in migratory cell behaviors. Cells rely on the nuclear ruler to modulate the motive force enabling their passage through restrictive pores in complex three-dimensional (3D) environments, a process relevant to cancer cell invasion, immune responses and embryonic development.
One Sentence Summary:
Nuclear envelope expansion above a threshold triggers a contractile cell response and thus acts as a ruler for the degree of cell deformation.
INTRODUCTION:
Much like modern day engineered devices, cells in the human body are able to make measurements. For example, epithelial cells in the intestine monitor local cell densities, and exit the tissue above a threshold density, preventing hyperplasia (1). Immune cells can estimate the pore size of surrounding tissues to choose the site of least mechanical resistance for migration (2). Epidermal stem cells use the amount of the extracellular matrix (ECM) available for cell attachment and spreading as a guidance cue in their cell fate decision-making (3). These examples illustrate the sensitivity of complex cell behaviors to environmental spatial and mechanical constraints, known in quantitative sciences as boundary conditions (BCs) (4). Although the importance of BCs in cell physiology is increasingly recognized, only a few mechanisms by which cells can measure specific BCs are precisely identified (e.g. the stiffness of the substrate on which cells grow (5), or the geometry of their adhesive environment (6)). Amongst the known mechanisms, most are related to either strain (deformation) or stress (forces) and are collectively referred to as mechanotransduction pathways (7).
Here, we asked whether cells are also equipped with a mechanism to measure absolute dimensions, which could instruct them about distances between neighboring cells or matrix pore size. In our previous study, we discovered that many histologically unrelated cell types change their migratory strategies in response to the specific confinement height (8). This almost universally leads to a long-lasting increase in actomyosin contractility and amoeboid cell propulsion in the absence of specific adhesion to the substrate. Together with similar findings in early zebrafish embryos (9), these observations illustrate the simplest case in which cells measure one of their dimensions to adapt their behavior to local BCs in vitro and in vivo. However, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remained unknown.
RESULTS:
Cells detect their height and trigger contractile responses below a threshold height
To tackle this question, we applied a reductionist approach in which the degree of cell confinement is precisely controlled and paralleled with quantitative microscopy. We confined single nonadherent, initially rounded, interphase cells using an ion beam-sculpted flat silicon microcantilever (Fig. 1A) mounted on an atomic force microscopy (AFM) setup (10) and simultaneously monitored the actomyosin cytoskeleton dynamics and contractile force generation employing confocal videomicroscopy and AFM-based force spectroscopy.
Figure 1: Cells sense their own height and upregulate actomyosin contractility at a specific height.
A: Left, representative force curve in response to step-wise (1 μm-increment, 5 min-interval) confinement of a cell by the flat microcantilever. Right, percentage of cells displaying a sustained force increase (> 15 nN) as a function of height. B: 3D images (XZ views) of the same live HeLa-Kyoto cell expressing MYH9-GFP at indicated heights. C: Time-lapse image sequence of the same live cell (XY views; single, midplane confocal slices) at 10 μm (top) followed by height change to 5 μm (bottom). Scale bar, 10 μm. D: Left, representative graph of myosin cortex-to-cytoplasm ratio as a function of time in the same live cell upon 10 μm and subsequently 5 μm confinement. Middle and right, the same ratio measured in single live cells at 10 μm and subsequently 5 μm confinement in the presence of DMSO or the ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (n = 10 cells per condition; p value, paired t test). Measurements were done 5 minutes after application of each confinement height. E: Left, representative force response curve (ΔF, force increase) as a function of time in the same live cell upon 10 μm and subsequently 5 μm confinement. Middle, statistical analysis of force response (ΔF) in cells at 10 vs. 5 μm. Right, statistical analysis of force response (ΔF) to 5 μm confinement in cells treated with DMSO or Y27632. Measurements were done 5 minutes after application of the confinement. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments (mean ± SD; n = 10 cells per condition; p value, unpaired t test). F: Left, representative image of 3D dermal fibroblast cell-derived matrix (CDM) stained with a collagen I antibody. Middle, representative images of HT1080 cells expressing GFP-myosin light chain 2 (GFP-MLC2) in 3D CDM (XY views, single confocal slices) with the smallest cell dimension (h) measured as 10 and 5 μm. Right, self-imposed smallest cell dimensions plotted against corresponding values for myosin cortex-to-cytoplasm ratio in the cells within 3D CDM (n = 30 cells). Scale bar, 20 μm.
Using the cell line HeLa-Kyoto (human cervical carcinoma) expressing MYH9-GFP (myosin IIA), we performed confinement experiments in which the height of the same single cell is changed in a step-wise fashion starting from 20 μm (average nonconfined cell diameter is 20 ± 4 μm, n = 100 cells). We found that upon reaching a specific confinement height, cells begin responding to it by steadily increasing force with which they push against the confining cantilever (6 to 5 μm confinement in Fig. 1A). Each cell had its own trigger height at which it generates the force response (Fig. 1A right graph). Most cells remained insensitive to 10 μm confinement (which corresponds to half of the initial cell height, Fig. 1B), while almost 100% of analyzed cells displayed the response upon reaching 5 μm confinement (Fig. 1A right graph). We thus chose to systematically study the response of cells to 5 vs. 10 μm confinement height.
Our analyses showed that cell confinement to 5 but not 10 μm stimulates rapid (2.05 ± 0.33 min, n = 10 cells) recruitment of myosin II (further referred to as myosin) from the cytosol to the cortex (Fig. 1C,D, Fig. S1A and Movie S1), which is then followed by cell cortex contraction and force production (Fig. 1E). Both phenomena required myosin activity (Fig. 1D,E) and culminated in a sustained (up to several hours) and active non-apoptotic plasma membrane (PM) blebbing (Movie S2), whose degree is directly proportional to cortical myosin concentration (Fig. S1B-D). Measuring cell blebbing index in several other primary and immortalized cell lines under different confinement heights confirmed the generality of our observations (Fig. S1E). To test whether cells would also adapt their cortical actomyosin contractility to the degree of environmental confinement in a context more closely recapitulating in vivo settings, we examined human fibrosarcoma cells HT1080 infiltrating 3D cell-derived matrices (CDM) (Fig. 1F). Cortical recruitment of myosin in these cells linearly scaled with self-imposed smallest dimension of the cell (Fig. 1F), thus validating our AFM-based observations. Importantly, switching cells back to the initial unconfined state in our AFM experiments induced a rapid (3.78 ± 0.94 min, n = 7 cells) re-localization of myosin to the cytosol (Fig. S1F), indicating that persistent contractility required a sustained confinement below the threshold height. Collectively, these experiments showed that single cells can sense the difference between 10 and 5 μm and trigger a sustained, yet reversible, active contractile response at a specific height.
Cell height-specific contractile responses depend on nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum-mediated signals
We next performed experiments to narrow down the range of potential mechanisms involved in this height-dependent contractile response. Confinement experiments on adherent, well-spread cells showed qualitatively the same threshold-like response as we established for rounded nonadherent cells (Fig. S2A-C). Moreover, experimental manipulations of extracellular [Ca2+] or [Mn2+] to modulate engagement of integrins during cell contact with the surface of the confining cantilever (11) did not affect the response in nonadherent suspended cells (Fig. S2D). This suggested that the sensing mechanism does not depend on classical integrin-based mechanotransduction pathways. The sustained increase in contractility (Fig. S1D), and the fact that the response was dependent on the confinement height per se rather than the speed of confinement (Fig. S3), renders unlikely a signal originating from strain in the actin cortex or the PM, because these structures dissipate stress in minutes due to fast turnover (12). A natural candidate that matches the range of relevant confinement heights at which the response is triggered and that can display long-term stress due to slow turnover of its stiff elastic shell is the cell nucleus (13). Indeed, the nucleus, and more specifically its envelope, has been shown in the recent years to trigger diverse cell responses when the nuclear compartment is deformed: entry of the transcription factors YAP/TAZ (14), activation of the ATR kinase (15), release of calcium (16), activation of the calcium-dependent phospholipase cPLA2 (17) and nuclear envelope (NE) rupture accompanied by DNA damage (18). Considering that the response to confinement was reversible and required only a few minutes for its manifestation, potential changes at the level of cell transcription/translation are unlikely at play, which we confirmed experimentally by acutely inhibiting the processes of transcription and translation (Fig. S4A). Blocking the ATR kinase activity did not yield a phenotype either (Fig. S4B). Moreover, ruptures of neither the NE nor the PM were observed at 5 μm confinement (Fig. S4C,D), excluding a mechanism based on an extracellular signal influx through transient holes in the PM, or mixing of cytoplasmic and nuclear contents.
We thus performed a small pharmacological inhibitors screen, targeting mechanotransductive pathways compatible with a minute timescale response of cells to confinement (Table S1). The screen (Fig. 2A and Table S2) showed that extracellular calcium, PM-associated stretch-sensitive channels and PM tension are not involved in the response to confinement. However, intracellular calcium, intracellular stretch-sensitive calcium channels associated with the perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the calcium-dependent myosin light chain kinase MLCK and the NE tension sensor cPLA2 were required for the contractile response, pointing to a signal emanating from the perinuclear ER and/or the NE to activate actomyosin contraction at a specific confinement height. Consistently, imaging of intracellular calcium using the GCaMP6 calcium biosensor revealed a strong increase in cytosolic calcium upon 5 μm confinement (Fig. S5A), which was inhibited by blocking intracellular stretch-sensitive calcium channels InsP3Rs with 2APB (Fig. S5B), but not via chelation of extracellular calcium with BAPTA (Fig. S5A). Conversely, adding ionomycin (to artificially increase cytosolic calcium concentration) or the signaling lipid arachidonic acid/ARA (an omega-6 fatty acid that can be produced in a NE stretch-sensitive manner via enzymatic activity of cPLA2 on nuclear membranes (17)) to cells confined to 10 μm induced persistent blebbing without further confinement (Fig. S5C). Finally, analysis of the supernatant of a population of confined cells (using a microfabricated confinement device, see Materials and Methods) showed an increase in ARA production upon 5 μm confinement, which is lost upon cPLA2 inhibition with AACOCF3/AA (Fig. S5D). Importantly, unlike Y27632 that globally perturbed basal cell contractility at both 10 and 5 μm, the drugs yielding a phenotype in our mini-screen exerted their effect only at 5 μm, as follows from our measurements of cortical cell tension, cell pressure, and myosin cortex-to-cytosol ratio at 10 μm (Fig. S5E). This indicated that the targets of the drugs become functionally engaged in a trigger-like fashion when the cell is confined below 10 μm. These results, together with the controls for drugs activity (Fig. S5F), suggested that the nuclear membrane compartment, continuous with the perinuclear ER, might be involved in measuring the cell dimensions and triggering the contractile response below a specific confinement height.
Figure 2: The height-specific contractile response is controlled by mechanisms associated with nuclear/ER membrane stretch.
A: Cortical myosin levels (left) and force response (ΔF, right) to 5 μm confinement of HeLa-Kyoto cells treated with drugs affecting PM tension and extracellular [Ca2+]out (blue) or ER/NE tension and intracellular [Ca2+]in (red). See Table S1 for drug target description and Materials and Methods for drug concentrations. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments (mean ± SD; n = 10 cells per perturbation; see Table S2 for statistics). B: 3D XZ views of the DAPI-stained nucleus at 20, 10, and 5 μm. C: Left, XY views of the nucleus at 10 and 5 μm. Middle and right, measurements of nuclear area and volume at 10 and subsequently 5 μm (n = 10 cells; p value, paired t test). Scale bar, 10 μm. D: Left top, images of the LAP2-GFP-labeled NE confined to 20-to-10-to-5 μm. Scale bar, 5 μm. Left bottom, zoom on a gradually opening nuclear fold. Sscale bar, 2.5 μm. Right, EOPNE at 10 and subsequently 5 μm (upper graph, n = 10 different cells; p value, paired t test) and statistics of EOPNE in cell populations at 20, 10, and 5 μm (lower graph, data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 30 cells per height; p value, unpaired t test). E: Images of the LAP2-GFP-labeled NE and EOPNE quantifications in live cells confined to 5 μm and un-confined to 20 μm (n = 10 cells; p value, paired t test). Scale bar, 5 μm. F: NE fluctuation curves at various confinement heights (h) and quantifications of NE fluctuations at 10 and subsequently 5 μm (n = 10 cells; p value, paired t test) or in cell populations at 20, 10, and 5 μm (mean ± SD; n = 30 cells per height; p value, unpaired t test). G: Images of NUP107-GFP-labeled nuclear pores (NPs) and quantification of inter-NP (NP-NP) distance at 10 and subsequently 5 μm (n = 10 cells; p value, paired t test). Scale bar, 0.5 μm. H: Images of nuclear cPla2-mKate2 signal and quantification of its NE-to-nucleoplasm (NE/NPM) ratio at 10 and subsequently 5 μm (n = 10 cells; p value, paired t test). Scale bar, 1.5 μm.
The trigger height for contractile cell responses is determined by NE tension
To understand how the NE/perinuclear ER and associated signaling pathways could be engaged in triggering the sustained contractile response of cells to a specific confinement height, we decided to characterize nuclear shape and deformation state at 20, 10 and 5 μm confinement (Fig. 2B). We observed that the nuclear volume undergoes only very minor changes, while projected surface area of the nucleus increases substantially between 10 and 5 μm confinement (Fig. 2C), suggesting a potential expansion of the NE. Indeed, we found that the NE in rounded nonadherent cells displays large folds and wrinkles, which become less prominent at 10 μm and completely disappear at 5 μm (Fig. 2D). To characterize this phenomenon quantitatively, we estimated the NE folding index by measuring the excess of perimeter of the NE (EOPNE) in the same single cell at various heights or statistically comparing this parameter across populations of cells confined to a specific height. We found that EOPNE decreases as cells get more confined (Fig. 2D; we also confirmed this result using an additional metric – standard deviation of the local curvature along the NE perimeter (Fig. S5G)). Un-confining cells led to a rapid refolding of the envelope concomitant with the loss of the contractile response (Fig. 2E). These measurements suggested that within the range of confinement heights applied in our experiments, the nucleus maintains a constant volume by progressively unfolding its envelope until reaching a fully unfolded state at 5 μm. A higher degree of confinement and more severe nuclear compression results in a significant nuclear volume loss (reported previously based on micropipette aspiration experiments (19)) and eventually NE rupture events that become predominant below 3 μm confinement height (20).
As the NE fully unfolds, it is likely to reach a state in which it stretches and becomes tensed. To estimate this parameter, we first measured the thermally and actively driven fluctuations of the NE on the time scale of seconds (see Materials and Methods and (21)). We found that the amplitude of the fluctuations systematically decreases as cells get more confined (Fig. 2F), consistent with an increase in the NE tension. Imaging nuclear pores in the NE of the same cell at various heights showed that confinement from 10 to 5 μm causes neighboring nuclear pores to become more distant from each other, consistent with a stretching of the NE (Fig. 2G). Finally, we observed that the mKate2-tagged phospholipase cPla2, sensing lipid crowding in the NE (17), remains in the nucleoplasm at 10 μm, but relocalizes to the NE at 5 μm (Fig. 2H), a transition previously shown to be triggered by nuclear membrane tension increase and to correspond to cPLA2 enzyme activation (17). Overall, these observations suggested that confinement to 5 μm stretches the NE.
To assess whether the height threshold at which cells display the active contractile response coincides with the induction of NE stretching, we took advantage of the variety of nuclear shapes and folding states in the cell population and systematically investigated these parameters along with contractile force and cell morphology readouts. First, correlative recording of F-actin and the NE (Fig. 3A bottom images) enabled us to observe that NE unfolding temporally precedes the onset of the contractile response (Fig. 3A top graph; Movie S3), with a delay of 38 ± 17 s (n = 20 cells). This is compatible with a causal link between the NE unfolding-stretching and the onset of a sustained contractile response. Second, we found that cells with more folded nuclei before confinement (larger EOPNE) start to contract at a lower confinement height (Fig. 3B), indicating that the degree of NE folding sets the sensitivity threshold for the ability of cells to discriminate between different confinement heights.
Figure 3: The “Nuclear Ruler” working model.
A: Representative graph of temporal evolution of NE unfolding (EOPNE, blue) and PM blebbing (EOPPM, red) and time-lapse image sequence of the LAP2-GFP-labeled NE (blue) and Lifeact-mCherry-labeled F-actin (red) in the same live cell responding to the sequential confinement to 20-to-10-to-5 μm. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: Height for the onset of contractile force response as a function of the degree of NE folding (EOPNE) before confinement (n = 20 cells). C: Sketch of the working model: cells utilize the nucleus as an internal ruler for their height. When a cell deforms below the resting height (h1) of its nucleus, the nuclear surface area (S) increases while the nuclear volume (V) remains constant. At a critical height (h2), the NE fully expands and gets stretched increasing its tension (T). The increase in NE tension stimulates stretch-sensitive proteins whose activity promotes and/or reinforces cortical actomyosin contractility.
Because we utilized cultured proliferating cells in our experiments, a source of cell-to-cell variability in responses to confinement could come from the cell cycle stage, which introduces a natural range of NE states in a cell population (21). Therefore, we decided to test a FUCCI HeLa cell line expressing fluorescent cell cycle stage markers in our confinement experiments. We determined that unconfined G1 cells have significantly higher values of EOPNE compared to G2 cells (Fig. S5H). While the unconfined cell height and mechanical state (basal cortical tension and cell pressure) at 10 μm confinement were similar for rounded, nonadherent G1 and G2 cells (Fig. S5H), G2 cells required less confinement than G1 cells to trigger the contractile response (Fig. S5H bottom right graph). This result further confirmed that the state and size of the nucleus defines a ruler to trigger the active contractile cell response. It also suggested that the nuclear ruler might render proliferating cells more or less sensitive to deformations depending on their cell cycle stage.
The ‘Nuclear Ruler’ working model
Altogether, our results suggested the following working model (Fig. 3C): each single cell in the rounded state has a certain nuclear volume and an excess of NE surface area stored in NE folds. When one of the dimensions of the cell is reduced below the resting nuclear diameter, the nucleus deforms and its envelope unfolds. Once the NE reaches full unfolding, it stretches, potentially together with the perinuclear ER, leading to calcium release from internal stores and cPLA2 re-localization onto the stretched NE followed by the cPLA2 enzyme activation and production of ARA. Both calcium ions and ARA are classical second messenger molecules with a well-known stimulatory effect on actomyosin contractility (22-24), thus mechanistically linking the cell height to cell contractility. Consistent with this model, the correlative live recording of cPla2-mKate2, calcium (GCaMP6-EGFP), and forces during cell height change from 10 to 5 μm, showed re-localization of cPla2 within 20 seconds and intracellular calcium increase within less than a minute, both phenomena preceding the contractile response of the cell (Fig. S5I).
A first direct prediction of the nuclear ruler model is that as cells start squeezing through a tissue opening with a size smaller than a resting nuclear diameter, they should deform-unfold-and-stretch their nuclei. This would lead to an increase in cortical myosin concentration. To test this prediction in a controlled and quantitative manner, we microfluidically flowed HeLa cells through microchannels with bottleneck constrictions. We found that nuclear deformations reflected in changes of the nuclear roundness index, indeed, precede myosin accumulation at the cortex, and that this takes place when the nuclear diameter is changed to approximately 5, but not 10 μm (Fig. 4A). To examine whether these dependencies can be observed in spontaneously migrating cells in a more physiological context, we looked at invasive HT1080 cells maneuvering through a 3D CDM. Plotting myosin cortical accumulation against the PM excess of perimeter (i.e. cell blebbing and thus contractility measure), we verified that our measure of myosin recruitment at the cell cortex is a good predictor of the degree of cell contractility in 3D (Fig. S6). This parameter scaled with the extent of nuclear surface folding, which in turn was dependent on the smallest nuclear dimension (Fig. 4B). These data showed that both imposed and spontaneous nuclear deformations observed in migrating cells correlate with the contractile response, suggesting that the nuclear ruler could be relevant in physiological contexts such as cells circulating in blood capillaries or cells migrating through dense tissues.
Figure 4: Correlation between nuclear stretching and cortical recruitment of myosin in experimentally deformed and spontaneously moving cells.
A: Left, representative images of DAPI-stained (magenta) HeLa-Kyoto cells microfluidically pushed into bottleneck PDMS constrictions. Color-coded nuclear outlines at different time points for a cell pushed into the constriction are shown at the bottom. Middle, representative image sequence of the nucleus (magenta) and MYH9-GFP-labeled myosin (green) in a live cell pushed into the constriction. Right top and bottom, images of the nucleus inside the bottleneck constriction reaching roundness equivalent to 10 and 5 μm confinement heights, and graph of the nuclear roundness index (magenta) and myosin cortical recruitment (green) in time representative of n = 30 cells. B: Left, representative images (XY views, single confocal slices) of RFP-NLS-labeled nuclei (top) and GFP-MLC2-labeled myosin in HT1080 cells within 3D CDM. Middle, smallest nuclear dimension plotted against corresponding values of EOPNE. Right, myosin cortex-to-cytoplasm ratio plotted against corresponding values of EOPNE (n = 30 cells). Scale bar, 5 μm.
Cells without the nucleus show defective contractile responses to spatial confinement
A second prediction of our working model is that removing the cell nucleus should affect the contractile response to confinement. We thus produced cytoplasts by cell enucleation using centrifugation (25). This resulted in a mixed population of enucleated cytoplasts and nucleated cells (Fig. 5A). Cytoplasts on average had a smaller volume compared to nucleated cells (Fig. S7A) but a rather similar height (cell volume scales to the cubic root of cell diameter). Thus, we were able to compare nucleated cells and enucleated cytoplasts of similar initial heights confined to 10 and 5 μm. While nucleated cells showed the expected contractile response at 5 μm, this was not the case for enucleated cytoplasts (Fig. 5B and Movie S4). Cytoplasts were not deficient in the contractile response pathway, because confining them further down to 1 μm triggered both a force response and myosin recruitment at the cortex (Fig. S7B), although to a significantly lesser extent compared to nucleated cells at 5 μm. Moreover, while the response of cytoplasts was reduced upon treatment with 2APB inhibiting calcium release from internal stores, it was not affected by treatment with the cPLA2 inhibitor AACOCF3 (Fig. S7B). This suggested that the pathway triggered at 1 μm in cytoplasts could be different from that activated in nucleated cells at 5 μm. Such pathway might involve direct compression of other endomembranes (e.g. the ER that remained present in enucleated cytoplasts (Fig. S7C)).
Figure 5: Enucleated cells and cells regioselectively confined to avoid the nucleus do not trigger contractile responses at relevant heights.
A: Left, representative images (XY views) of a nucleated (DAPI (blue)-positive) cell and an enucleated (DAPI-negative) cytoplast. Right, XZ views of a cell and a cytoplast of similar height representative of those selected for analyses. Scale bar, 5 μm. B: Images (top) and quantifications (bottom) of myosin cortical accumulation (left) and force response (ΔF, right) in cells (n = 10) and cytoplasts (n = 10) confined to 10 vs. 5 μm. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; p value, unpaired t test. Scale bar, 10 μm. C: Regioselective confinement of the nuclear region (lower cell) vs. the nucleus-free lamella (upper cell). Cyan, DAPI nuclear stain; Red hot, myosin signal; Dashed squares, zoomed regions (right images). Scale bar, 10 μm. D: Quantifications of myosin cortical accumulation and force response (ΔF) upon nuclear (n = 10) and lamellar cortex (n = 10) confinement. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; p value, unpaired t test.
To further demonstrate the difference in responsiveness to confinement provided by the nucleus vs. the rest of the cell, we used spread nucleated cells and took advantage of the small size of the wedged cantilever tip to apply a local deformation on the cell (Fig. 5C). This experiment showed that locally compressing the cell cortex in the lamellar region, even down to less than 1 micron (Fig. S8 and Movie S5), produces only a very transient response, while confining the part of the cell that contains the nucleus results in a sustained contractile response (Fig. 5D and Movie S6). Upon nuclear deformation, myosin cortical recruitment occurred even in the region which was not directly confined (Fig. 5D). This showed that the contractile response is not due to the cell deformation per se, but rather due to a signal which could get released locally and propagate away from the nucleus (indeed, the increase in contractility in the non-confined part manifested with a slight delay compared to the nuclear region, Movie S6). In conclusion, consistent with our working model, the nucleus is required to set the size at which the contractile response is triggered and the deformation of nuclear or nucleus-associated compartments is necessary to trigger the sustained response.
Cells with altered NE properties have a defective nuclear ruler
We further tested the nuclear ruler model by affecting the stiffness and the folded state of the NE. Lamin A/C-depleted cells (Fig. S9A) displayed nuclear dysmorphia and a more floppy NE (Fig. 6A), but did not undergo excessive cell death, even upon confinement to 5 μm height (Fig. S9B), at which the depleted cells also show a high rate of NE ruptures (Fig. 6A bottom left graph). This mechanical instability of the NE, together with the modifications of NE viscoelastic properties upon lamin A/C depletion, could contribute to the relaxation of tension in the envelope. While volume, projected area (Fig. S9C), and surface folding (Fig. S9D) of Lamin A/C-depleted nuclei were not significantly affected, we found that NE fluctuations in the depleted cells did not decrease in response to 20-10-5 μm confinement (Fig. 6A top right graph), which was in contrast to control cells (Fig. 2F). This suggested that the envelope of depleted nuclei remained floppy at all confinement heights. Confinement of depleted cells to 5 μm did not trigger intracellular calcium release nor did it increase levels of ARA production (Fig. S9E ‘5 μm confinement’ subpanel). Consistently, while their basal mechanics were unaltered at 10 μm (Fig. S9E ‘10 μm confinement’ subpanel), the depleted cells displayed an attenuated contractile response at 5 μm confinement (Figs. 6A bottom right graph and S9F). This was in agreement with the nuclear ruler model. It further suggests that the level of lamin A/C, which varies to a great extent in different cell types and environmental conditions, can modulate the response of cells to spatial confinement by affecting the mechanical properties of the NE.
Figure 6: The nuclear ruler is defective in cells with altered nuclear envelope properties.
A: Top left, representative images of DAPI-stained nuclei in HeLa-Kyoto cells treated with control or LMNA siRNA. Top right, quantifications of NE fluctuations in LMNA siRNA-treated cells under 20, 10, and 5 μm confinement (data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 20 cells per height; p value, unpaired t test). Bottom left, percentage of cells displaying nuclear rupture at 5 μm. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; n = 15 cells per condition. Bottom right, force response (ΔF) to 5 μm confinement. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 10 (Ctrl si) and 15 (LMNA si) cells; p value, unpaired t test. Scale bar, 10 μm. B: Top, representative images of NE in HeLa-Kyoto cells stably expressing LAP2-GFP or ectopically overexpressing (OE) LBR-GFP and corresponding EOPNE quantifications. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 10 cells per condition; p value, unpaired t test). Bottom, force response (ΔF) to 5 μm confinement. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 10 (LAP2) and 15 (LBR OE) cells; p value, unpaired t test. Scale bar, 10 μm.
The inner nuclear membrane and ER membrane protein lamin B receptor/LBR is known to control NE folding in a dose-dependent manner (26). Its overexpression leads to perinuclear ER expansion and overproduction of NE membranes, which in turn provides additional NE surface area to accommodate excess membrane protein (27, 28). Indeed, our measurements of nuclear surface folding showed that LBR-GFP overexpressing (OE) cells have a highly folded nucleus and fail to unfold it in response to 5 μm confinement, which is in contrast to LAP2/LAP2b-expressing (control) cells (Fig. 6B images and top graph and Fig. S9G). Consistently, LBR OE abrogated both cytoplasmic calcium increase and levels of ARA production at 5 μm (Fig. S9H ‘5 μm confinement’ subpanel). While their basal cortical mechanics were unaltered at 10 μm (Fig. S9H ‘10 μm confinement’ subpanel), LBR-GFP OE significantly impaired contractile responses to 5 μm confinement (Figs. 6B bottom graph and S9I). Therefore, we concluded that NE folding-and-unfolding constitutes a key element of the nuclear ruler mechanism. These findings further suggested that modulation of NE components that affect the extent of NE folding (e.g. LBR and SUN2 (29)) could allow different cell types to trigger responses to various levels of confinement, or to measure different ranges of sizes, depending on their function.
The nuclear ruler participates in adaptive modulation of cell propulsion during confined migration
We hypothesized that the nuclear ruler mechanism can be used by migrating cells to increase their propulsion when surrounding space becomes limited, explaining the switch to fast amoeboid migration upon confinement of slow mesenchymal cells, which we reported previously (8). In support of this hypothesis, we found that single HeLa-Kyoto cells, remaining under the confining AFM cantilever for prolonged periods of time, can spontaneously initiate movement enabling the cells to evade the cantilever (Fig. S10A). We also observed the predicted increase in migration speed upon confinement of immature mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cell (iDC) populations using our microfabricated confiner device (Fig. 7A, (30)). This speed increase was lost upon functional ablation of cPLA2 (Figs. 7A bottom graph, S10B upper right graph, and 7B right graph) or lamin A (Fig. 7A bottom graph, (31)), and corresponded specifically to the confinement height (3 μm) at which iDC nuclei get fully unfolded (Fig. 7C). Consistently, myosin accumulated at the iDC cortex in a cPLA2-dependent manner specifically at 3 μm (Fig. 7D). A large fraction of iDCs at 3 μm switched to a migratory polarized cell shape phenotype characteristic of fast-moving cells that was almost entirely lost upon cPLA2 depletion (Figs. 7B, S10B, and Movie S7). Overall, the data obtained from both HeLa-Kyoto cells and primary iDCs suggested that the nuclear ruler pathway could be involved in triggering a contractile ‘evasion reflex’ helping invasive cells to either rapidly escape or penetrate the most confined regions of dense tissues.
Figure 7: The nuclear ruler function in immune cell migration.
A: Left and middle, cartoons illustrating primary culture of iDCs and their confinement between two parallel surfaces inducing a highly migratory DC phenotype. Right top, iDC velocity measured at 10 (n = 20 cells), 4 (n = 35 cells), and 3 (n = 35 cells) μm confinement height (h). Right bottom, cell velocity (vcell) measured at 3 μm confinement in control (DMSO and wild-type (WT)) vs. cPLA2-inhibited (AACOCF3/AA treatment) or Lmna knockout (KO) cells (n = 20 cells per condition). Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; p value, unpaired t test. B: Top, temporal color-coded cell tracks from a representative time-lapse movie of control (Ctrl si) and cPLA2a-depleted (Pla2g4a si) LifeAct-GFP-expressing iDCs under 3 μm-confinement. Bottom, statistical analysis of cell velocity (vcell) for control and depleted cells at 4 vs. 3 μm. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 20 cells per condition; p value, unpaired t test. Scale bar, 50 μm. C: Representative images of DAPI-stained nuclei (XY view, single confocal slices) and EOPNE quantifications in iDCs at 4 vs. 3 μm. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 35 cells per condition; p value, unpaired t test. Scale bar, 5 μm. D: Representative images and quantifications of myosin cortical accumulation in control (Ctrl si) and cPLA2a-depleted (Pla2g4a si) MYH9-GFP-expressing iDCs at 4 and 3 μm. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n = 20 cells per condition; p value, unpaired t test. Scale bar, 15 μm.
To further test the function of the nuclear ruler in invasive cell migration, we assessed the protease-independent ability of human metastatic skin melanoma cells (MCs), a well-established cellular model employing contractility-driven, amoeboid invasive motion in vivo (32), to chemotactically transmigrate (Fig. S10C) through 3D dermal collagen gels or synthetic polycarbonate membranes with different porosity. 3D collagen lattices (Fig. 8A left images) displayed pore sizes ranging from 1 to 12 μm (Fig. S10D), thus representing a heterogeneous, mechanically restrictive environment in which cells are expected to deform their nuclei. Indeed, perturbations targeting the nuclear ruler pathway affected the efficiency of MC transmigration through 3D collagen (Fig. 8A right graph and Table S3). Consistent with the diameter of their nuclei (11 ± 2 μm, n = 100 cells), MCs were dependent on basal actomyosin contractility or pathways associated with the nuclear ruler only when transmigrating through 8- but not 12-μm pores of polycarbonate membranes (Fig. 8B left images and Fig. S10E, and Table S3). These results suggested that thanks to the nuclear ruler, migratory cells can utilize the energetically costly actomyosin contractility motor on demand, when local cell environment becomes restrictive to migration.
Figure 8: The nuclear ruler function in cancer cell migration.
A: Left, 3D light-sheet microscopy images of atelopeptide fibrillar bovine dermal collagen (1.7 mg ml−1) lattices. Right, quantifications of the percentage of human melanoma cells A375P able to chemotactically transmigrate through the lattice (1 mm thick) in the presence of the broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 in conditions affecting cell contractility (Y27, BBS, and ML7), NE properties (LMNA si and LBR OE), cPLA2 expression and activity (PLA2G4A si, AA, and PA), and stretch-sensitive calcium release (Gd3+, GsMTx4, 2APB, and Xesto). Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n ≥ 300 cells per condition. See Table S3 for drug target description and pairwise statistical comparisons, and Materials and Methods for drug concentrations. B: Scanning electron microscopy images of polycarbonate membranes with 12 (blue) and 8 (red) μm pores (scale bar, 10 μm), and quantifications of the percentage of A375P cells able to chemotactically transmigrate through the pores in the conditions specified in A. Data are from ≥ 2 experiments; mean ± SD; n ≥ 300 cells per condition. See Table S3 for drug target description and pairwise statistical comparisons, and Materials and Methods for drug concentrations. Dotted line in A and B, cell transmigration rate upon global perturbation of actomyosin contractility.
DISCUSSION
Collectively, our data establish a nongenetic function for the nucleus as an internal ruler. Relying on this ruler, cells can measure the degree of their environmental confinement and rapidly tailor specific behaviors to adapt to the confinement at timescales shorter than changes in gene expression. In the context of cell migration, such tailored cellular behaviors might help cells avoiding environmental entrapment, which is relevant to cancer cell invasion, immune cell patrolling of peripheral tissues, and progenitor cell motility within a highly crowded cell mass of a developing embryo (33). The nuclear ruler mechanism defines an active function for the nucleus in cell migration, potentially explaining why enucleated cells show a poor motile capacity in dense collagen gels (34). Engaging the nuclear ruler and generating propulsive forces, cells can push their large nucleus through small openings, thus overcoming the rate-limiting effect of the bulky and stiff nucleus on confined migration. However, some highly specialized and short-lived cells such as neutrophils trade nuclear size and stiffness for uncompromised migration through dense tissue regions. To achieve this, maturing neutrophils transcriptionally upregulate LBR and downregulate LMNA expression that makes the nucleus highly pliable (35) and might cancel its rate-limiting effect and ruler function in the context of confined migration.
The nuclear ruler mechanism relies on NE tension sensing by the phospholipid-hydrolyzing enzyme cPLA2 (13, 17). The enzymatic activity of cPLA2 is fundamental to the eicosanoid biosynthetic pathway known for its function as an essential mediator of paracrine inflammatory signaling in the immune system, with effects on immune cell contractility and migration (36, 37). The function we propose here relies on a direct mechanical activation of cPLA2 and subsequent release of ARA, but it does not exclude the induction of the downstream signaling associated with ARA metabolism. When we confined the nucleus in only one cell out of a pair of closely juxtaposed cells, we did not observe any signs of contractility activation in the neighboring cell (Fig. S11), suggesting that paracrine signaling might not be enough to activate contractility in this case. Fully characterizing the signaling cascade triggered by mechanical activation of the cPLA2 pathway and subsequent changes in lipid metabolism in the context of confined cell migration is an important perspective for future studies. We also showed that the nuclear ruler pathway depends on stretch-activated intracellular calcium release. Here, we pinpointed a role for InsP3Rs, but there are many other stretch-sensitive calcium channels on the ER and nuclear membranes (38) that could contribute to the pathway in a cell type- or context-specific fashion.
Establishing the nucleus as an internal ruler of the extracellular environment opens up avenues of research not only in the field of single cell migration, but also tissue homeostasis and developmental biology. Indeed, morphological changes associated with cell spreading on the ECM are known to affect nuclear morphology and cell cycle progression (39). Therefore, the nuclear ruler might contribute to cell fate choices during tissue growth. Given that cell crowding in tissues such as epithelia alters the cell shape and aspect ratio, tissue cells in addition to the known mechanisms (1) might utilize the nucleus as a sensor of local cell density.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
Human cervical adenocarcinoma cells HeLa-Kyoto stably expressing myosin IIA (MYH9)-GFP and LifeAct-mCherry or MYH9-GFP and the plasma membrane-targeting CAAX box fused to mCherry, or LAP2/LAP2b-GFP, NUP107-GFP, HeLa (CCL-2) cells stably expressing cPla2-mKate2, human fibrosarcoma cells HT1080 expressing GFP-myosin light chain 2 and RFP-NLS, primary human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs), human melanoma cells A375P, N-rasV12 oncogene-transformed rat liver epithelial cells IAR-2, and canine kidney epithelial cells MDCK-2 were maintained in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Human epidermal stem cells (HESCs) were cultured as previously described (40). All cell lines were tested for mycoplasma contamination using MycoScope™ PCR Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Genlantis). Mouse bone-marrow derived immature dendritic cells (iDCs) were obtained by culturing bone marrow cells (from both male and female 8- to 10- week-old LifeAct-GFP mice (41), MYH9-GFP mice (42), and control (JAX™ mice stock number: 000664) or Lmna KO mice (31) for 10-11 days in complete DC medium (IMDM medium supplemented with fetal calf serum (FCS, 10%), glutamine (20 mM), penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/mL), ß-mercaptoethanol (50 μM) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/GM-CSF (50 ng/mL)-containing supernatant obtained from transfected J558 cells.
Transfection procedure, expression vectors, and siRNA oligonucleotides
Cells were transfected with plasmid DNA using Lipofectamine™ LTX reagent (Invitrogen) transiently or stably, according to manufacturer's protocol. For RNA interference experiments, cells were transfected with siRNA oligonucleotides using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen), according to manufacturer's protocol. In experiments on cPLA2a knockdown in bone marrow-derived mouse immature dendritic cells (iDCs), the cells were transfected using the Amaxa mouse Dendritic Cell Nucleofector Kit (Lonza).
The following expression vectors were used for plasmid DNA transfections: empty vector pEGFP-C1 (Clontech); Addgene plasmids: 61996 LBR pEGFP-N2 (646) (43), 40753 pGP-CMV-GCaMP6s (44), 86849 pBOB-EF1-FastFUCCI-Puro (45). To knockdown LMNA or cPLA2a, cells were transfected with nontargeting siRNA (control) or validated ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA reagents (Dharmacon) targeting human-specific LMNA mRNA (cat. # L-004978-00-0005), human-specific PLA2G4A mRNA (cat. # L-009886-00-0005), or mouse-specific Pla2g4a mRNA (cat. # L-063167-01-0010). Unless stated otherwise, cells were analyzed 72 h post-transfection using standard Western blot or immunofluorescent analysis protocols. Based on quantitative densitometry of proteins, the knockdown efficiency was estimated as 84.7 ± 2.5% (3 repeats). Additionally, lentiviral transductions were performed to achieve lamin A knockdown in HeLa cells. Viral particles were produced by transfection of 0.8 million 293FT cells with 3 μg DNA and 8 μl TransIT-293 (Mirus Bio) per well. For shRNA mediated knockdown of lamin A, 0.4 μg CMV-VSVG, 1 μg psPAX2 and 1.6 μg of either pLKO.1-puro-LMNAsh4 (TRCN0000061837, target sequence GCCGTGCTTCCTCTCACTCAT) or pLKO1puro-shLACZ (target sequence GCGATCGTAATCACCCGAGTG) as negative control were combined. Viral supernatants were harvested 48 hours post transfection, filtered at 0.45 μM and added on to HeLa cells that had been seeded one day prior to transduction at a 2:1 ratio of viral supernatant:medium containing protamine at a final concentration of 1 μg/mL. Cells were washed once in PBS and passaged at 48 hours post transduction with 2 μg/mL of puromycin for selection of stably transduced cells.
Drug treatments
The following pharmacological inhibitors and chemical compounds were used: 10 μM ROCK-mediated contractility inhibitor Y27632 (Y27) (EMD), 10 μM myosin II ATPase inhibitor blebbistatin (BBS) (Toronto Research Chemicals), 20 μM Ca2+-sensitive myosin light chain kinase/MLCK inhibitor ML-7 (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM apoptosis inducer hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 1 μM transcription inhibitor triptolide (TRP) (Tocris Bioscience), 50 μg ml−1 translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 μM AZD6738 inhibiting the Serine/Threonine protein kinase Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) capable of sensing nuclear envelope tension (Tocris Bioscience), 10 μM nonspecific plasma membrane permeability marker propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.4 mM plasma membrane tension reducer sodium deoxycholate (DOCL) (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μM gadolinium (III) chloride (Gd3+) or 5 μM peptide GsMTx4 from the tarantula venom affecting mechanosensitive ion channels on the plasma membrane (Tocris Bioscience), 2 mM extracellular Ca2+ chelator BAPTA (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μM intracellular Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μM ionomycin (IOM) directly facilitating the transport of Ca2+ across the plasma membrane (Sigma-Aldrich), 70 μM signaling lipid arachidonic acid (ARA) (a product of enzymatic activity of the nuclear envelope stretch-sensitive enzyme cPLA2) activating actomyosin contractility (Cayman Chemical), 20 μM AACOCF3 (AA) or 10 μM PACOCF3 (PA) inhibiting the nuclear envelope stretch-sensitive enzyme cPLA2 (Tocris Bioscience), 100 μM 2APB or 10 μM Xestospongin C (Xesto) blocking stretch-activated inositol triphosphate receptors (InsP3Rs) on the ER/nuclear membranes (Tocris Bioscience), and 20 μM broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 (Merck Millipore). Growth medium was supplemented with 1% DMSO (vol/vol) (Sigma-Aldrich) in control experiments.
Western blotting
Cells were collected and resuspended in Laemmli buffer. Proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. After incubation with primary (Lamin A/C antibody #2032 (Cell Signaling Technology), cPLA2a antibody #PA5-29100 (Invitrogen), and GAPDH antibody #ab9483 (Abcam)) and secondary (IRDye® and VRDye™ (LI-COR)) antibodies, the membranes were visualized using Odyssey® CLx Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR).
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
To assess the efficacy of the siRNA treatment, qPCR was carried out on iDCs after 48 hours of the siRNA treatment. RNA extraction was performed using RNeasy Micro RNA kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was produced using the high capacity cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, starting from 1 μg of RNA. Quantitative PCR experiments were performed using Taqman Gene Expression Assay (Applied Biosystems) and carried out on a Lightcycler 480 (Roche) using the settings recommended by the manufacturer. The following primers were used: Mm01284324_m1 for PLA2g4 and Mm99999915 for GAPDH as a control. cPLA2a expression was assessed in si-control and si-cPLA2a iDCs. Samples were run in triplicate for each condition. Data were subsequently normalized to GAPDH values, and to the values obtained in control iDCs. The fold change was calculated using the formula 2−ΔΔCT.
Single-cell flat AFM-based confinement coupled to live cell imaging
Trypsinized cells were resuspended in CO2-independent, phenol red-free DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen) and plated on glass-bottomed 35-mm dishes (FluoroDish, WPI). Experiments with non-adherent cells were initiated 30 minutes after cell plating to allow for cell sedimentation. Spread cells were obtained 6 hours post cell plating. Dishes with cells were mounted in a dish heater (JPK Instruments) and kept at 37 °C under an inverted light microscope (Axio Observer.Z1; Zeiss) equipped with a confocal microscope unit (LSM 700; Zeiss) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) head (CellHesion 200; JPK Instruments).
Focused ion beam (FIB)-sculpted, flat silicon microcantilevers were processed and calibrated as described in (46). The microcantilevers were fixed on a standard JPK glass block and mounted in the AFM head. The cantilever was lowered on the cell to a preset height with a constant speed of 0.5 μm·s−1, and the resulting varying force and cantilever height were recorded over time. At the same time, differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence images at the midplane of the confined cell (the imaging settings were readjusted to the medial plane of the cell each time the cell was confined to a specific height) were recorded every 5 seconds using a 63× water immersion objective. All microscopy equipment was placed, and experiments were carried out in a custom-made isolation box.
Determination of cell pressure and cortical tension
Cell geometry, pressure, and cortical tension were measured based on AFM and imaging data as described in (46) and (47).
Production of cytoplasts
Enucleated cells were generated as described in (25) and (48).
Microfabrication-based confinement of cell populations
To obtain large quantities of confined cells for cell population or biochemical studies, cell confinement was performed using a home-made device (8) consisting of a suction cup made in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, RTV615, GE) used to press a confining coverslip bearing PDMS microspacers (micropillars) on top of the culture substrate populated with cells. The height of the micropillars (10 μm vs. 5 μm) determines the height for spatial confinement of cells between the coverslip and the substrate. A version of the cell confiner adapted to multi-well plates was used to perform multiple experiments in parallel (20). The molds for the PDMS micro-spacers were fabricated following standard photolithography procedures. The surface of the confining side was always treated with non-adhesive pLL-PEG (SuSoS).
Assaying activation of apoptosis in live cells
To detect levels of active apoptotic caspases, the Image-iT LIVE Red Poly Caspases detection kit based on a fluorescent inhibitor of caspases (FLICA) methodology (I35101, Molecular probes) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Biochemical measurements of arachidonic acid (ARA) release
Cells were confined using microfabricated devices as described in the subsection “Microfabrication-based confinement of cell populations”. Confinement was released and the cells were immediately extracted with Dole's solution (heptane, isopropyl alcohol, 1 N sulfuric acid; 10:40:1). Pentafluorobenzyl esters of the fatty acids were prepared and quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with reference to an internal standard of d8-AA as described in (49).
Epithelial monolayer stretching
A custom-made stretching device was used to perform epithelial monolayer stretching experiments as described in (1).
Chemotactic transmigration assays
Serum-starved A375P cells were harvested and transferred in serum-free medium to the upper compartment of 5, 8 (Cat. # 3421 and 3428, Corning), or 12 (Cat. # CBA-107, Cell Biolabs Inc.) μm-pore polycarbonate membrane inserts (transwells). Cell density was adjusted according to the specific area of each transwell with 5×104, 1.5×105, and 7.5×105 cells added to 5, 12, and 8 μm transwells, respectively. Cells were allowed to transmigrate toward the lower compartment containing 10% FBS for 12 h. Transmigration efficiency was calculated as number of cells at the lower compartment divided by the number of cells added to the upper compartment of a transwell.
To examine the ability of A375P cells to chemotax through 3D collagen gels, atelopeptide fibrillar bovine dermal collagen (Cat. # 5005-B; PureCol, Advanced BioMatrix) was prepared at 1.7 mg ml−1 in DMEM and allowed to polymerize in the upper compartment of the 12 μm-pore polycarbonate membrane insert (Cat. # CBA-107, Cell Biolabs Inc.). Serum-starved cells were seeded on top of the collagen pad in serum-free medium, allowed to adhere and transmigrate through the collagen layer and the membrane toward the lower compartment containing 10% FBS for 24 h. Transmigration efficiency was calculated as number of cells at the lower compartment divided by the number of cells added to the upper compartment of the transwell.
Generation of 3D cell-derived matrices (CDMs)
HFFs were plated at high density on gelatin-coated and glutaraldehyde-treated 35 mm (4 x 105 cells, MatTek) or 50 mm (5.7 x 105 cells, Warner Instruments) glass-bottom dishes. Cultures were maintained for 10 days, adding new media with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid every other day. The matrices were denuded of cells by adding extraction buffer (20 mM NH4OH and 0.5% Triton X100 in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature and washed with PBS.
Quantitative image analysis
Fluorescence intensity levels (mean gray values, a.u.) were obtained from background subtracted images using the ImageJ/Fiji software (NIH, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html).
The Imaris (version 8.3) image analysis software (Bitplane) was utilized to measure nuclear volume reconstructed from 3D confocal microscopy images.
The dimensionless parameter excess of perimeter (EOP) was calculated to estimate the amount of nuclear envelope (NE) or plasma membrane (PM) area stored in macro- and micro-folds. To calculate EOP, we first obtained values for perimeter (P) and surface area (A) from 2D images taken at the maximum radius of the nucleus (NE marker LAP2-GFP labelling) or cell (PM marker CAAX box-mCherry labelling). Next, we introduced R0 as the radius of the circle defined by the area A, which allowed us to compute EOP as the ratio between (P - 2πR0) and (2πR0). EOP values of a highly folded object tend to be close to 1, while EOP of an object with a smooth surface tend to be close to 0. Additional theoretical calculations were performed to account for experimentally observed changes in nuclear aspect ratio (AR); no significant contribution of AR changes to the measured values of EOP was observed.
Nuclear roundness index was obtained using the shape descriptors tool in ImageJ/Fiji.
The MIPAR™ v.3.2.3. image analysis software (MIPAR Software) and the Kappa plugin for ImageJ/Fiji https://github.com/brouhardlab/Kappa/tree/master/docs#fit-the-curve-to-the-data) were used to estimate NE surface curvature.
To measure NE fluctuations, nuclei of live cells expressing LAP2-GFP were recorded using a high frame rate acquisition mode (250 msec/frame) for 5 minutes. The position of each nucleus was corrected for linear and rotational drift using the Stackreg plugin of the ImageJ/Fiji software. Upon drift correction, the edge of the nucleus was registered at a given angle. NE fluctuations were calculated by measuring the standard deviation of the NE from its mean position. To precisely position the NE, linescans across the NE (intensities along a line of 1 pixel in width perpendicular to the NE) were made at different positions along the NE. For each point along the NE and for each timepoint in the movie, the point of maximum intensity was calculated on the linescan and a parabola was fitted on points before and after the maxima to determine the localization of the NE with a sub-pixel resolution. For each position along the NE, the mean position was taken as the mean of all the timepoints. The standard deviation of the position of the NE around this mean position was taken as one measure for the fluctuation of the NE. Each point along the NE contributes one measure. Obtained mean NE fluctuation values were expressed in μm. The same approach can be applied to measure PM fluctuations. A floppy, and thus less tensed, membrane is expected to fluctuate more, while a membrane under tension exhibits no or significantly diminished fluctuations.
The distance between neighboring nuclear pores (NP-NP distance) was estimated for the same living cell expressing a NP maker NUP107-GFP at different degrees of spatial confinement. To this end, a medial confocal slice of the nucleus was obtained to then trace individual NPs along the NE using the Linescan function of the MetaMorph (version 7.7) software (Molecular Devices). Each individual NP was resolved as a local maximum of fluorescence intensity on the Linescan diagram. The distance between nearest local maxima was represented as NP-NP distance.
Cell speed was analyzed using the manual tracking plugin of ImageJ/Fiji.
To measure collagen pore sizes, collagen fibers were imaged via axially swept light-sheet microscopy (50). The fibers were then detected from the deconvolved images by applying a steerable filter (51) followed by non-maximum-suppression. We then calculated pore sizes using a custom-written Matlab code implementing the algorithm described in (2).
Statistics and reproducibility of experiments
Unless stated otherwise, statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired or paired Student's t-test after confirming that the data met appropriate assumptions (normality, homogenous variance and independent sampling). Statistical data are presented as average ± either SEM or SD. Sample size (n) and p-value are specified in the text of the paper or figure legends. Samples in most cases were defined as the number of cells counted/examined within multiple different fields of view on the same dish/slide, and thus represent data from a single sample within a single experiment. When data from a single sample are shown, they are representative of at least three additional samples from independent experiments.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
The authors wish to acknowledge I. Poser and A. Hyman (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany) for providing stable BAC transgenic HeLa cell lines expressing various fluorescent protein markers, as well as P. Niethammer (Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA) for sharing the HeLa cell line that stably expresses cPla2-mKate2, and V. Sanz-Moreno (Queen Mary University of London, London, UK) for providing A375P cells. LBR pEGFP-N2 (646) was a gift from E. Schirmer (Addgene plasmid #61996; http://n2t.net/addgene:61996; RRID: Addgene_61996). pGP-CMV-GCaMP6s was a gift from D. Kim & GENIE Project (Addgene plasmid # 40753; http://n2t.net/addgene:40753; RRID: Addgene_40753). pBOB-EF1-FastFUCCI-Puro was a gift from K. Brindle & D. Jodrell (Addgene plasmid #86849; http://n2t.net/addgene:86849; RRID: Addgene_86849). We thank L. Allison and R. Fleck (Centre for Ultrastructural Imaging at King's College London, London, UK) and D. Mathys (Swiss Nanoscience Institute at University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland) for performing scanning electron microscopy of polycarbonate membranes and focused ion beam-based flat AFM cantilever nanofabrication, respectively. We are grateful to B. Baum (University College London, London, UK), D. Gerlich (Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria), and M. Kraakman (Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna Austria) for comments on the manuscript. We also thank G. Charras (University College London, London, UK) for the advice to estimate internuclear pore distance in nuclei at various degrees of spatial confinement, and N. Carpi (Institut Curie, Paris, France) for excellent technical assistance with experiments. We also thank A. Williart, L. Barbier, and P. Vargas (Institut Curie, Paris, France) for performing additional experiments during the revision of the article, which were finally not included in the article but helped our reasoning. Some illustrations accompanying figures of the present manuscript were partially generated using the BioRender.com online tool
Funding:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Programme (Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement n. PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102, through the PRESTIGE programme coordinated by Campus France. A.J.L. was supported by the Marie Curie & PRESTIGE Fellowship (grant 609102), London Law Trust Medal Fellowship (grant MGS9403), and a Career Grant for Incoming International Talent (grant 875764) from the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG). D.J.M. was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Molecular Systems Engineering. This work was also supported by the Institut Pierre-Gilles de Gennes-IPGG (Equipement d’Excellence, “Investissements d’avenir”, program ANR-10-EQPX-34) and laboratoire d’excellence, “Investissements d’avenir” program ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL and ANR-10-LABX-31. This work was additionally supported by the Institut National du Cancer (INCa grant 2018-PL Bio-02) to M.P. and INCa (grant 2019-PL BIO-07) and INSERM Plan Cancer Single Cell (grant 19CS007-00) to N.M. and M.P. R.J.P. was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01GM126054. R.F. received funding from the National Institutes of Health (grants R35GM133522-01 and R33CA235254-02). J.M.G.G. was financed by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (PI17/01395; PI20/00306) and I3 SNS program. M.D. was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (grant K99GM123221). N.S.D.S. received a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (DCBIO 751735) and an EMBO Long-term fellowship (ALTF 1298-2016). I.Z. was supported by a Metchnikov Fellowship from the Franco-Russian Scientific Cooperation Program.
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests
Data and materials availability: All data is available in the main text or the supplementary materials.
References and Notes:
- 1.Eisenhoffer GT, Loftus PD, Yoshigi M, Otsuna H, Chien C-B, Morcos PA, Rosenblatt J, Crowding induces live cell extrusion to maintain homeostatic cell numbers in epithelia. Nature. 484, 546–549 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Renkawitz J, Kopf A, Stopp J, de Vries I, Driscoll MK, Merrin J, Hauschild R, Welf ES, Danuser G, Fiolka R, Sixt M, Nuclear positioning facilitates amoeboid migration along the path of least resistance. Nature. 568, 546–550 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT, Strange DGT, Li Y, Oyen ML, Cohen Stuart MA, Boehm H, Li B, Vogel V, Spatz JP, Watt FM, Huck WTS, Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater 11, 642–649 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vahey MD, Fletcher DA, The biology of boundary conditions: cellular reconstitution in one, two, and three dimensions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 26, 60–68 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oria R, Wiegand T, Escribano J, Elosegui-Artola A, Uriarte JJ, Moreno-Pulido C, Platzman I, Delcanale P, Albertazzi L, Navajas D, Trepat X, García-Aznar JM, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Roca-Cusachs P, Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells. Nature. 552, 219–224 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Théry M, Jiménez-Dalmaroni A, Racine V, Bornens M, Jülicher F, Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature. 447, 493–496 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kechagia JZ, Ivaska J, Roca-Cusachs P, Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 20, 457–473 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu Y-J, Le Berre M, Lautenschlaeger F, Maiuri P, Callan-Jones A, Heuzé M, Takaki T, Voituriez R, Piel M, Confinement and Low Adhesion Induce Fast Amoeboid Migration of Slow Mesenchymal Cells. Cell. 160, 659–672 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ruprecht V, Wieser S, Callan-Jones A, Smutny M, Morita H, Sako K, Barone V, Ritsch-Marte M, Sixt M, Voituriez R, Heisenberg C-P, Cortical Contractility Triggers a Stochastic Switch to Fast Amoeboid Cell Motility. Cell. 160, 673–685 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stewart MP, Toyoda Y, Hyman AA, Müller DJ, Tracking mechanics and volume of globular cells with atomic force microscopy using a constant-height clamp. Nat. Protoc 7, 143–154 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kong F, García AJ, Mould AP, Humphries MJ, Zhu C, Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol 185, 1275–1284 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clark AG, Wartlick O, Salbreux G, Paluch EK, Stresses at the Cell Surface during Animal Cell Morphogenesis. Curr. Biol 24, R484–R494 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Enyedi B, Niethammer P, A Case for the Nuclear Membrane as a Mechanotransducer. Cell. Mol. Bioeng 9, 247–251 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Elosegui-Artola A, Andreu I, Beedle AEM, Lezamiz A, Uroz M, Kosmalska AJ, Oria R, Kechagia JZ, Rico-Lastres P, Le Roux A-L, Shanahan CM, Trepat X, Navajas D, Garcia-Manyes S, Roca-Cusachs P, Force Triggers YAP Nuclear Entry by Regulating Transport across Nuclear Pores. Cell. 171, 1397–1410.e14 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar A, Mazzanti M, Mistrik M, Kosar M, Beznoussenko GV, Mironov AA, Garrè M, Parazzoli D, Shivashankar GV, Scita G, Bartek J, Foiani M, ATR Mediates a Checkpoint at the Nuclear Envelope in Response to Mechanical Stress. Cell. 158, 633–646 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Itano N, Okamoto S. -i., Zhang D, Lipton SA, Ruoslahti E, Cell spreading controls endoplasmic and nuclear calcium: A physical gene regulation pathway from the cell surface to the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 100, 5181–5186 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Enyedi B, Jelcic M, Niethammer P, The Cell Nucleus Serves as a Mechanotransducer of Tissue Damage-Induced Inflammation. Cell. 165, 1160–1170 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Raab M, Gentili M, de Belly H, Thiam H-R, Vargas P, Jimenez AJ, Lautenschlaeger F, Voituriez R, Lennon-Dumenil A-M, Manel N, Piel M, ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science (80-. ). 352, 359–362 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rowat AC, Lammerding J, Ipsen JH, Mechanical Properties of the Cell Nucleus and the Effect of Emerin Deficiency. Biophys. J 91, 4649–4664 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Le Berre M, Aubertin J, Piel M, Fine control of nuclear confinement identifies a threshold deformation leading to lamina rupture and induction of specific genes. Integr. Biol 4, 1406 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chu F-Y, Haley SC, Zidovska A, On the origin of shape fluctuations of the cell nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 114, 10338–10343 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsai F-C, Meyer T, Ca2+ Pulses Control Local Cycles of Lamellipodia Retraction and Adhesion along the Front of Migrating Cells. Curr. Biol 22, 837–842 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Solanes P, Heuzé ML, Maurin M, Bretou M, Lautenschlaeger F, Maiuri P, Terriac E, Thoulouze M, Launay P, Piel M, Vargas P, Lennon-Duménil A, Space exploration by dendritic cells requires maintenance of myosin II activity by IP3 receptor 1. EMBO J. 34, 798–810 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ming Cui Gong A Fuglsang, D. Alessi, S. Kobayashi, P. Cohen, A. V. Somlyo, A. P. Somlyo, Arachidonic acid inhibits myosin light chain phosphatase and sensitizes smooth muscle to calcium. J. Biol. Chem 267, 21492–21498 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rodionov V, Nadezhdina E, Peloquin J, Borisy G, Digital fluorescence microscopy of cell cytoplasts with and without the centrosome. Methods Cell Biol. 67, 43–51 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gravemann S, Schnipper N, Meyer H, Vaya A, Nowaczyk MJM, Rajab A, Hofmann WK, Salewsky B, Tönnies H, Neitzel H, Stassen HH, Sperling K, Hoffmann K, Dosage effect of zero to three functional LBR-genes in vivo and in vitro. Nucleus. 1, 179–189 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ma Y, Cai S, Lv Q, Jiang Q, Zhang Q, Sodmergen, Zhai Z, Zhang C, Lamin B receptor plays a role in stimulating nuclear envelope production and targeting membrane vesicles to chromatin during nuclear envelope assembly through direct interaction with importin beta. J. Cell Sci 120, 520–530 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ellenberg J, Siggia ED, Moreira JE, Smith CL, Presley JF, Worman HJ, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Nuclear Membrane Dynamics and Reassembly in Living Cells: Targeting of an Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein in Interphase and Mitosis. J. Cell Biol 138, 1193–1206 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Donahue DA, Amraoui S, di Nunzio F, Kieffer C, Porrot F, Opp S, Diaz-Griffero F, Casartelli N, Schwartz O, SUN2 Overexpression Deforms Nuclear Shape and Inhibits HIV. J. Virol 90, 4199–4214 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Le Berre M, Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz E, Bonazzi D, Lautenschlaeger F, Piel M, in Methods in Cell Biology (2014; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128002810000142), pp. 213–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim Y, Zheng Y, Generation and characterization of a conditional deletion allele for Lmna in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 440, 8–13 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sanz-Moreno V, Gadea G, Ahn J, Paterson H, Marra P, Pinner S, Sahai E, Marshall CJ, Rac Activation and Inactivation Control Plasticity of Tumor Cell Movement. Cell. 135, 510–523 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Venturini V, Pezzano F, Castro FC, Häkkinen H-M, Jiménez-Delgado S, Colomer-Rosell M, Sánchez MM, Tolosa-Ramon Q, Paz-López S, Valverde MA, Loza-Alvarez P, Krieg M, Wieser S, Ruprecht V, The nucleus measures shape deformation for cellular proprioception and regulates adaptive morphodynamics. bioRxiv (2019), doi: 10.1101/865949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Graham DM, Andersen T, Sharek L, Uzer G, Rothenberg K, Hoffman BD, Rubin J, Balland M, Bear JE, Burridge K, Enucleated cells reveal differential roles of the nucleus in cell migration, polarity, and mechanotransduction. J. Cell Biol 217, 895–914 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Manley HR, Keightley MC, Lieschke GJ, The Neutrophil Nucleus: An Important Influence on Neutrophil Migration and Function. Front. Immunol 9 (2018), doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Afonso PV, Janka-Junttila M, Lee YJ, McCann CP, Oliver CM, Aamer KA, Losert W, Cicerone MT, Parent CA, LTB4 Is a Signal-Relay Molecule during Neutrophil Chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 22, 1079–1091 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Majumdar R, Tavakoli Tameh A, Parent CA, Exosomes Mediate LTB4 Release during Neutrophil Chemotaxis. PLOS Biol. 14, e1002336 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 38.Alonso MT, Garcia-Sancho J, Nuclear Ca2+ signalling. Cell Calcium. 49, 280–289 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aureille J, Buffière-Ribot V, Harvey BE, Boyault C, Pernet L, Andersen T, Bacola G, Balland M, Fraboulet S, Van Landeghem L, Guilluy C, Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force. EMBO Rep. 20 (2019), doi: 10.15252/embr.201948084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Watt F, Simon B, Prowse D, in Cell Biology (Elsevier, 2006; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780121647308500174), pp. 133–138. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Riedl J, Flynn KC, Raducanu A, Gärtner F, Beck G, Bösl M, Bradke F, Massberg S, Aszodi A, Sixt M, Wedlich-Söldner R, Lifeact mice for studying F-actin dynamics. Nat. Methods 7, 168–169 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang Y, Conti MA, Malide D, Dong F, Wang A, Shmist YA, Liu C, Zerfas P, Daniels MP, Chan C-C, Kozin E, Kachar B, Kelley MJ, Kopp JB, Adelstein RS, Mouse models of MYH9-related disease: mutations in nonmuscle myosin II-A. Blood. 119, 238–250 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zuleger N, Kelly DA, Richardson AC, Kerr ARW, Goldberg MW, Goryachev AB, Schirmer EC, System analysis shows distinct mechanisms and common principles of nuclear envelope protein dynamics. J. Cell Biol 193, 109–123 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen T-W, Wardill TJ, Sun Y, Pulver SR, Renninger SL, Baohan A, Schreiter ER, Kerr RA, Orger MB, Jayaraman V, Looger LL, Svoboda K, Kim DS, Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 499, 295–300 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Koh S-B, Mascalchi P, Rodriguez E, Lin Y, Jodrell DI, Richards FM, Lyons SK, A quantitative FastFUCCI assay defines cell cycle dynamics at a single-cell level. J. Cell Sci 130, 512–520 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cattin CJ, Düggelin M, Martinez-Martin D, Gerber C, Müller DJ, Stewart MP, Mechanical control of mitotic progression in single animal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 112, 11258–11263 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fischer-Friedrich E, Hyman AA, Jülicher F, Müller DJ, Helenius J, Quantification of surface tension and internal pressure generated by single mitotic cells. Sci. Rep 4, 6213 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rodionov V, Nadezhdina E, Borisy G, Centrosomal control of microtubule dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 96, 115–120 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Riendeau D, Guay J, Weech PK, Laliberte F, Yergey J, Li C, Desmarais S, Perrier H, Liu S, Nicoll-Griffith D, Street IP, Arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone, a potent inhibitor of 85-kDa phospholipase A2, blocks production of arachidonate and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid by calcium ionophore-challenged platelets. J. Biol. Chem 269, 15619–15624 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dean KM, Roudot P, Welf ES, Danuser G, Fiolka R, Deconvolution-free Subcellular Imaging with Axially Swept Light Sheet Microscopy. Biophys. J (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aguet F, Jacob M, Unser M, in Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP; (2005). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








