Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2021 Mar 11;108(4):739–748. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.015

Monoallelic and bi-allelic variants in NCDN cause neurodevelopmental delay, intellectual disability, and epilepsy

Ambrin Fatima 1,14, Jan Hoeber 1,15, Jens Schuster 1,15, Eriko Koshimizu 2, Carolina Maya-Gonzalez 1, Boris Keren 3, Cyril Mignot 3, Talia Akram 1,4, Zafar Ali 4, Satoko Miyatake 2,5, Junpei Tanigawa 6, Takayoshi Koike 7, Mitsuhiro Kato 8, Yoshiko Murakami 9, Uzma Abdullah 10, Muhammad Akhtar Ali 11, Rein Fadoul 1, Loora Laan 1, Casimiro Castillejo-López 1, Maarika Liik 12, Zhe Jin 13, Bryndis Birnir 13, Naomichi Matsumoto 2, Shahid M Baig 4,14, Joakim Klar 1, Niklas Dahl 1,
PMCID: PMC8059333  PMID: 33711248

Summary

Neurochondrin (NCDN) is a cytoplasmatic neural protein of importance for neural growth, glutamate receptor (mGluR) signaling, and synaptic plasticity. Conditional loss of Ncdn in mice neural tissue causes depressive-like behaviors, impaired spatial learning, and epileptic seizures. We report on NCDN missense variants in six affected individuals with variable degrees of developmental delay, intellectual disability (ID), and seizures. Three siblings were found homozygous for a NCDN missense variant, whereas another three unrelated individuals carried different de novo missense variants in NCDN. We assayed the missense variants for their capability to rescue impaired neurite formation in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells depleted of NCDN. Overexpression of wild-type NCDN rescued the neurite-phenotype in contrast to expression of NCDN containing the variants of affected individuals. Two missense variants, associated with severe neurodevelopmental features and epilepsy, were unable to restore mGluR5-induced ERK phosphorylation. Electrophysiological analysis of SH-SY5Y cells depleted of NCDN exhibited altered membrane potential and impaired action potentials at repolarization, suggesting NCDN to be required for normal biophysical properties. Using available transcriptome data from human fetal cortex, we show that NCDN is highly expressed in maturing excitatory neurons. In combination, our data provide evidence that bi-allelic and de novo variants in NCDN cause a clinically variable form of neurodevelopmental delay and epilepsy, highlighting a critical role for NCDN in human brain development.

Keywords: NCDN gene, neurodevelopmental delay, intellectual disability, epilepsy, speech delay, neurite formation, mGluR5 signaling, missense variant, de novo variant

Main text

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a clinically heterogeneous group of cognitive, neurological, and neuropsychiatric conditions that manifest during childhood.1 Although the major fraction of NDDs has a multifactorial origin, identification of the genetic basis for rare Mendelian forms has brought important insights into molecular pathways and functional modules of importance for the formation and homeostasis of the human brain.2 Furthermore, understanding the precise cause of Mendelian NDDs provides critical information for diagnosis, counselling, and the development of specific treatment options.3 With the implementation of next-generation sequencing technologies, gene variants in hundreds of genes have been associated with Mendelian NDDs, illustrating an extensive genetic heterogeneity.4,5 It is now estimated that almost half of all affected individuals with severe NDD have a pathogenic and protein-coding de novo variant,4 whereas inherited and recessive acting variants account for only a small fraction of resolved and affected individuals in outbred populations.6 Despite the enormous progress over the last decades, it is now generally accepted that many genes and genetic mechanisms associated with neurodevelopmental delay remain to be identified in efforts to improve the diagnostic yield.7,8

We report on bi-allelic and de novo variants in NCDN (MIM: 608458) causing NDD and epilepsy with broad clinical variability. The NCDN gene encodes neurochondrin (NCDN), initially named norbin, a leucine-rich cytoplasmic protein widely expressed in developing and adult brain.9,10 The protein is highly conserved and enriched in α helices but without homologies to known functional domains.11 Originally identified as a regulator of neurite outgrowth,12 NCDN is an adaptor protein for G-coupled receptors13 and modulates metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) signaling of importance for synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum and hippocampus.14 Mice with conditional depletion of Ncdn in the nervous system exhibit epileptic seizures and show spatial learning defects.15 Furthermore, Ncdn−/− mice show impaired neural proliferation and maturation, reduced amounts of mGluR5 on the surface of cortical neurons, and abolished long-term potentiation (LTP),14,16 a form of neuronal plasticity of importance for learning and memory.16

The study was conducted on four families and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and after written informed consent from all legal guardians. The study was approved by the regional ethical committee of Uppsala, Sweden; the ethical review board at National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad; and the Committees for Ethical Issues at Showa University School of Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, and Yokohama City University School of Medicine.

We initially identified a consanguineous family of Pakistani origin segregating three siblings presenting with similar degree of neurodevelopmental delay, mild ID, and seizures. The healthy parents are first cousins and without family history of NDD. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) performed on DNA from two of the affected siblings uncovered a homozygous missense variant of unknown significance in NCDN (c.1297G>C [p.Glu433Gln] [GenBank: NM_014284.3]). Segregation analysis of the variant confirmed that both parents were heterozygous, whereas all three affected siblings, but not a fourth unaffected sibling, were homozygous (Figure 1A). The c.1297G>C variant is predicted to be pathogenic according to MutationTaster and CADD score but tolerated and benign via Sift and PolyPhen-2, respectively (Table S1). Furthermore, c.1297G is conserved with a phastCons score17 of 0.884. The expression pattern and known functions of NCDN prompted us to search for additional independent affected individuals with NDD and NCDN variants. The identification of disease-causing variants has been improved by development of web-based platforms, enabling researchers to ascertain additional affected individuals with allelic variants and to explore genotype–phenotype correlations. Using GeneMatcher,18 a part of the Matchmaker exchange project,19 we identified another three simplex affected individuals of French (F2: II.1), Chinese (F3: II.1), and Japanese (F4:II.1) origin carrying NCDN variants (Figure 1A). These three independent affected individuals presented with a variable degree of neurodevelopmental delay and carried unique heterozygous de novo variants in NCDN (c.1433G>A [p.Arg478Glu], c.1492T>C [p.Trp498Arg], and c.1955C>T [p.Pro652Leu] [GenBank: NM_014284.3 for all three variants]), respectively (Figures 1A–1C). The three missense variants were found to have a phastCons score of 1, they localized in highly conserved regions, and they were pathogenic according to the variant intolerance prediction tools MutationTaster, Sift, and PolyPhen-2 (Table S1). Genetic tolerance for each amino acid (aa) position in NCDN (UniProt: Q9UBB6) was further predicted by MetaDome.20 The p.Glu433Gln variant is considered “slightly tolerant” (tolerance score = 1.01), while p.Arg478Glu (tolerance score = 0.32), p.Trp498Arg (tolerance score = 0.29), and p.Pro652Leu (tolerance score = 0.4) are considered “intolerant” (Figure 1D). NCDN has a missense Z score of 3.76 (observed/expected = 0.51 [0.46–0.57]), whereas it has a synonymous Z score of 0.73 (o/e = 0.94 [0.83–1.05]), suggesting the gene to be highly intolerant to missense variants. This is supported by a residual variation intolerance score (RVIS) of −1.77, indicating that NCDN is among the 4.2% most intolerant human genes to variants.21

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Segregation of rare NCDN missense variants in families with neurodevelopmental phenotypes

(A) Pedigrees of four unrelated families with affected members indicated as filled circles (females) and squares (males). Double horizontal lines indicate consanguinity (first cousins).

(B) Representative chromatograms are shown for each NCDN variant indicated by vertical red boxes and arrowheads.

(C) Schematic representation of NCDN spanning seven exons with relative positions of variants identified in this study. Filled boxed regions denote coding sequences and white boxed regions denote untranslated regions.

(D) Tolerance landscape visualization for missense variants in NCDN via MetaDome20 with relative positions of the four predicted amino acid (aa) substitutions. The graph indicates that variants close to, or within, the mGluR5-interacting domain (gray box)14 are less tolerated. The p.Glu433 position, affected by the recessive missense variant c.1297G>C, is “slightly tolerant,” while the three heterozygous de novo variants are “intolerant” for aa substitutions.

The clinical features of the three affected individuals with de novo NCDN variants overlapped with those of the three affected siblings homozygous for c.1297G>C. The phenotypic findings of the altogether six affected individuals are summarized in Table 1. Neurodevelopmental delay was diagnosed in all affected individuals between ages 1 month and 4 years. Follow-up investigations revealed intellectual disability (ID) that varied from mild to severe. Speech delay was shared by all six affected individuals and developed at age 2–3 years in 5/6 individuals and is still absent in one individual now at 5 years of age. Ability to walk was achieved at age 3–5 years in 3/6 affected individuals. One individual is still unable to walk at age 5 years. Four affected individuals had reached the age of 10 years and showed at that time a capability to read and write corresponding to 2–4 years of delay. Head circumference was reduced (<−2 SD) in 2/6 affected individuals and slightly reduced (<−1 SD) in 4/6 affected individuals. Furthermore, a general growth retardation was found in the three siblings of family 1 (F1:II.1, F1:II.2, and F1:II.3) and in individual F4:II.1. The individual F4:II.1 presented with esotropia, hypertelorism, and epicanthus, but facial dysmorphisms were otherwise absent among the affected individuals. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 5/6 affected individuals and was either generalized (n = 4) or focal (n = 1). The three affected siblings in family 1 had sporadic or febrile seizures, whereas two individuals (F3:II.1 and F4:II.1) had a history of early onset myoclonic encephalopathy. The two affected individuals became seizure free after neurosurgery (F3:II.1) or upon treatment with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and Zonisamide (F4:II.1). The electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns showed a slightly pathogenic pattern in the three affected siblings and hypsarrhythmia in affected individuals F3:II.1 and F4:II.1. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on three independent affected individuals showed signs of delayed myelination in individual F3:II.1, whereas no overt structural abnormalities were detected in individuals F1:II.1 and F4:II.1.

Table 1.

Summary of clinical findings in six affected individuals with NCDN missense variants

Family Family 1 Family 2 Family 3 Family 4
Individual F1:II.1 F1:II.2 F1:II.3 F2:II.1 F3:II.1 F4:II.1
Gender male female female male male female
Age of observed onset 4 years 4 years 4 years 2.5 years 1 month 4 months
Age at most recent examination 16 years 15 years 14 years 13 years 3 years 5 years
Ethnicity Pakistani Pakistani Pakistani French Chinese Japanese
NCDN variants NM_014284.3 c.1297G>C (p.Glu433Gln) c.1297G>C (p.Glu433Gln) c.1297G>C (p.Glu433Gln) c.1433G>A (p.Arg478Glu) c.1492T>C (p.Trp498Arg) c.1955C>T (p.Pro652Leu)
Variant type homozygous homozygous homozygous de novo heterozygous de novo heterozygous de novo
heterozygous
Body height and age 160 cm at 16 years (−2.5 SD) 149 cm at 15 years (−2.5 SD) 145 cm at 14 years (−2.5 SD) 152 cm at 11 years (+2.0 SD) 96 cm at 3 years (+0.7 SD) 92 cm at 5 years (−3.2 SD)
Head circumference and age at measurement 53 cm at 14 years (−1.1 SD) 50 cm at 13 years (−2.8 SD) 50 cm at 12 years (−2.6 SD) 51 cm at 10 years (−1.5 SD) 47 cm at 3 years (−1.6 SD) 49 cm at 5 years (−0.8 SD)
Facial dysmorphisms no no no no high arched palate esotropia, hypertelorism, epicanthus
Ambulation walked at age 3 years, normal ambulation walked at age 5 years, normal ambulation walked at age 1 year, normal ambulation walked at age 14 months, normal ambulation walked at age 3 years, normal ambulation unable to walk at age 5 years
Speech development first words at age 2–3 years, normal speech at age 16 years first words at age 2 years, normal speech at age 15 years first words at age 2 years, normal speech at age 14 years first words at age 3 years, profound speech problems at age 13 years first words at age 2 years no meaningful words at age 5 years
Learning disabilities read and write with difficulties at age 16 years read and write with difficulties at age 15 years read and write with difficulties at age 14 years read and write like a beginner at age 10 years N/A N/A
Vision, hearing normal normal normal normal normal normal
ID yes, mild yes, mild yes, mild yes, mild yes, moderate yes, severe
Seizures yes yes (febrile) yes (febrile) no yes yes
Frequency 1–2/month rare rare 50 times/day prior to treatment 5 times/day prior to treatment
Type of seizures generalized generalized, fever induced generalized, fever induced epileptic spasms, focal epileptic spasms, myoclonus
Medication valproic acid no medication valproic acid valproic acid, topiramate, perampanel, and ACTH; seizure-free after surgery seizure-free with ACTH and ZNS
Brain MRI normal structures not performed not performed not performed delayed myelination normal structures
EEG slightly abnormal slightly abnormal slightly abnormal normal at 3 years hypsarrhythmia at age 4 months hypsarrhythmia at age 1 year

N/A, not available; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; ZNS, zonisamide.

To clarify the pathophysiological effects of the observed NCDN variants, we then generated a neural cell model depleted of NCDN by using the human neuroblastoma line SH-SY5Y. When stimulated with retinoic acid (RA), wild-type (WT) SH-SY5Y cells acquire neuron-like phenotypes such as neurite formation, electrical excitability, and expression of neurotransmitters and neurotransmitter receptors.22 We targeted NCDN in WT SH-SY5Y cells by using CRISPR/Cas9 and expanded two independent clones with distinct homozygous NCDN deletions, one spanning 16 bp (c.1458_1473del16 [GenBank: NM_014284.3]; SH-SY5YNCDNΔ16/Δ16), assigned KO#2, and one spanning 1,158 bp; (chr1: 36,027,723–36,028,880; SH-SY5YNCDNΔ1158/Δ1158), assigned KO#9. The 16 bp deletion (KO#2) is located within exon 5 of NCDN and the 1,158 bp deletion (KO#9) spans intron 3 to exon 5 (Figure S1). Both deletions are predicted to cause frameshift and the premature stop codons p.Ala486Alafs45 and p.Val382Alafs24, respectively. We also generated a control, assigned “control-Cas9,” by transfecting WT SH-SY5Y cells with CRISPR/Cas9 but without gRNA. The top predicted off-target sites were analyzed by Sanger sequencing and revealed WT sequences in the KO#2 and KO#9 clones (Figure S2). Furthermore, depletion of NCDN protein was confirmed in both clones by immunoblot analysis (Figure 2A). Given the effects of NCDN on neurogenesis,16 we then differentiated the control-Cas9, KO#2, and KO#9 lines for 7 days with RA, allowing for neurite formation (Figure S3).22 Image-based analysis revealed that neurites were formed in all three lines (Figure 2B). We then estimated the average neurite length in each line by counting intersections between neurites and test lines of a superimposed frame of fixed size23 applied on neuronal cultures as described previously.24 The number of neurites intersecting with test lines were divided by the total number of soma present in the image and used as a measure of neurite outgrowth. The average number of neurites per cell was manually counted in individual cells from a subset of all collected images via the cell counter plugin of ImageJ software (Fiji v.1.52p). We found that the neurites in the two NCDN-deficient lines were shorter and fewer in number when compared with neurites in the control-Cas9 line expressing endogenous NCDN. To clarify whether the altered neurite outgrowth was a direct effect of NCDN deficiency, we then expressed WT NCDN in the KO#9 clone. Transfection with a full-length WT NCDN construct (pAcGFP1-N1-NCDN-WT) followed by differentiation revealed a restoration of both length and numbers of neurites in KO#9 (Figures 2C and 2D). We next investigated whether the four NCDN missense variants of our affected individuals could restore the neurite length and number in SH-SY5Y cells depleted of NCDN. To this end, KO#9 cells were transfected with full-length NCDN expression constructs containing any of the four NCDN variants: c.1297G>C (p.Glu433Gln), c.1433G>A (p.Arg478Glu), c.1492T>C (p.Trp498Arg), or c.1955C>T (p.Pro652Leu). Transfection with a WT NCDN construct was used as reference. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were differentiated for 7 days via RA stimulation. Image-based analysis of KO#9 cells transfected with each of the four variant constructs revealed that both length and number of neurites were consistently reduced when compared with KO#9 cells transfected with WT NCDN (Figures 2E and 2F). The four variants thus failed to rescue the neurite phenotypes that were comparable to non-transfected KO#9 cells. Furthermore, neurite formation in KO#9 cells transfected with pAcGFP1-N1-empty vector were similar to non-transfected KO#9 cells (Figures 2E and 2F). These data suggest that the impaired neurite formation in SH-SY5Y cells depleted of NCDN is rescued by the expression of WT NCDN but not by NCDN constructs expressing the four missense variants.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Missense variants in NCDN alter length and number of neurites in SH-SY5Y cells

(A) Immunoblot analysis of WT SH-SY5Y (lane 2) and the two independent SH-SY5Y cell clones, KO#2 (lane 3) and KO#9 (lane 4), with CRISPR/Cas9-induced homozygous deletions in NCDN, confirming depletion of NCDN protein. An Anti-Ncdn antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was used with β-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich) as a loading control. A PageRuler Plus pre-stained protein ladder (lane 1) was used as molecular weight markers (Thermo).

(B) Bright field microscopy images of control-Cas9 SH-SY5Y cells (left) and the two independent SH-SY5Y clones, KO#2 and KO#9 (mid and right). Cells were differentiated (Diff.) for one week.

(C) Neurite length in differentiated SH-SY5Y lines. The clones KO#2 and KO#9 show reduced neurite length when compared to the control clone (Cas9-transfected without gRNA). Neurite length was completely rescued in KO#9 after expression of WT NCDN. Data were normalized to WT SH-SY5Y cells differentiated in parallel and set to 1.0.

(D) Neurite number in differentiated SH-SY5Y lines. Cells of clones KO#2 and KO#9 showed a reduced neurite number when compared to the Cas9-transfected control clone. Complete restoration of neurite numbers was observed in KO#9 cells after expression of WT NCDN. Data were normalized as in (C).

(E) Overexpression of WT NCDN and NCDN containing the four missense variants in KO#9 SH-SY5Y line. Expression of WT NCDN rescued the neurite length in KO#9. In contrast, overexpression of NCDN encoding the missense variants p.Glu433Gln, p.Arg478Glu, p.Trp498Arg, and p.Pro652Leu failed to rescue the reduced neurite length in KO#9. The transfection control (GFP control) showed a neurite outgrowth similar to KO#9.

(F) Expression of WT NCDN rescued the neurite number in KO#9. Overexpression of the four NCDN variants in KO#9 failed to rescue the reduced number of neurites. The transfection control (GFP control) showed a neurite number similar to KO#9. The experiments were performed in triplicate and data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean represented by error bars. Statistical analysis of three independent experiments was performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test (∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001).

NCDN interacts with mGluR1 and mGluR5, encoded by GRM1 (MIM: 604473) and GRM5 (MIM: 604102).14,25 Activation of mGluR5 induces the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)26 that can be used as a measure of mGluR activity.27 We therefore reasoned that the effect of NCDN variants on mGluR1/5-induced signaling can be assessed by quantification of ERK phosphorylation. To this end, GFP-tagged WT NCDN and each of the four mutant constructs were co-transfected with a full-length GRM5 construct into KO#9 cells. The GRM5 construct transfected into KO#9 cells was used as control. Transfection efficiency was confirmed by fluorescence after 24 h, followed by serum starvation for 24 h. Activation of mGluRs via dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) was induced, followed by cell harvest. Immunoblot analysis of protein lysates from the cells revealed a significant increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation in cells expressing WT NCDN when compared with cells expressing only GRM5 (Figure 3A). Compared with WT NCDN, the overexpression of NCDN constructs containing the c.1492T>C or c.1955C>T variants showed markedly reduced levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 when assessed by immunoblotting. This observation is consistent with the position of the two missense variants in a region of NCDN encoding the mGluR5-interacting domain (Figures 1D and 3A).14,28 In contrast, overexpression of the NCDN variants c.1297G>C and c.1433G>A, replacing residues outside the mGluR5-interacting domain of NCDN, showed no apparent effect on ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Figure 1A). Besides the interaction with mGluR5, NCDN tethers or mediates the activation of several proteins important for downstream signaling through phosphorylation of both ERK and CaMKII.14,15,29 We therefore sought to investigate the effect of loss of NCDN in SH-SY5Y on the interacting partners mGluR1 and mGluR5, as well as on calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). Using qPCR, we observed differential expression for the three NCDN-interacting partners when comparing NCDN-deficient and WT SH-SY5Y cells (Figure S4). Our findings suggest that the two variants c.1492T>C and c.1955C>T, affecting residues in the mGluR-interacting domain, inhibit mGluR1/5-induced ERK phosphorylation and that NCDN depletion in SH-SY5Y cells results in altered expression of factors belonging to the mGluR pathway.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NCDN variants interfere with mGluR5 signaling and alter electrophysiological properties of SH-SY5Y cells

(A) ERK1/2 phosphorylation in transfected KO#9 cells expressing WT NCDN or NCDN containing each of the p.Glu433Gln, p.Arg478Glu, p.Trp498Arg, and p.Pro652Leu variants when compared to cells expressing only mGluR5. DHPG-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation was quantified in serum-starved transfected KO#9 cells expressing the mGluR5 receptor alone, mGluR5 receptor co-expressed with WT NCDN, or co-expressed with NCDN containing p.Glu433Gln, p.Arg478Glu, p.Trp498Arg, and p.Pro652Leu. The p.Glu433Gln and p.Arg478Glu rescued phosphorylation to normal levels, whereas p.Trp498Arg and p.Pro652Leu, positioned in the mGluR5 interacting domain, did not. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was determined by immunoblot and band intensities correspond to phospho-ERK1/2 and total ERK1/2. Phosphorylated ERK1/2 was normalized with total ERK1/2. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean represented by error bars. Statistical analysis of four independent experiments was performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test (p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ns = not significant). Mock = un-transfected.

Representative immunoblot (n = 5, bottom panels) of DHPG-induced ERK phosphorylation.

(B) Abortive action potentials (APs) evoked in response to rectangular current injections in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with a holding potential of −70 mV and current injections of 100 pA for 100 ms, suggesting different decay kinetics between NCDN-depleted (KO#2 [n = 5], KO#9 [n = 5]) and WT (n = 15) SH-SY5Y cells. The average rising time was similar when comparing KO#2 and KO#9 (32.18 ± 0.74 ms) with WT SH-SY5Y (33.35 ± 0.64 ms) cells at injected currents of 100 pA. The average voltage responses show abortive AP.

(C and D) 90% AP decay time (C) and 90% AP decay amplitude (D) show a significant change in AP decay kinetics in KO#2 and KO#9 SH-SY5Y cells when compared to WT SH-SY5Y cells. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean represented by error bars. Statistical analysis was carried out with unpaired t tests with Welch correction (∗∗p < 0.005). mV, millivolts; ms, milliseconds.

(E) Cell-type-specific expression of NCDN in the human cortex derived from fetuses at post-conceptional weeks 6–37. The t-SNE plot shows the excitatory neural cell cluster defined by NEUROD6 expression (left panel). The cluster is further divided into immature excitatory neurons (iENs), expressing NRP1, and maturing excitatory neurons (mENs), expressing GRIN2B (boxed). Expression of NCDN and GRM5 are detected mainly at the mEN stage. Expression levels are scaled, log-normalized data from Seurat 3. Expression levels are color-coded in the feature plots.

(F) Expression levels of the five genes in the excitatory cell cluster of fetal cortex showing enriched expression of NCDN and GRM5 in mEN. RG, radial glia; IN, interneurons; iEN, immature excitatory neurons; mEN, maturing excitatory neurons.

Seizure was a shared feature in 5/6 affected individuals in our study. Furthermore, mice with a homozygous conditional disruption of Ncdn in the central nervous system exhibit epilepsy.15 We therefore set out to investigate the electrophysiological properties of NCDN-deficient SH-SY5Y cells by using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. Cultures of KO#9 and WT SH-SY5Y lines were differentiated for 7 days. Cell sizes from both cultures were similar when evaluated by capacitance measurements (Figure S5A). The patch-clamp analysis revealed a resting membrane hyperpolarization in KO#2 and KO#9 lines (−45.00 ± 0.55 mV) when compared to WT SH-SY5Y (−38.23 mV ± 1.58 mV; Figure S5B). Upon 100 ms rectangular current injections, NCDN-depleted lines showed abortive action potentials (APs) and without differences in the rising phase of the APs (Figure 3B). However, AP repolarization kinetics was significantly different, and there was an increased repolarization rate (mV/ms) in NCDN-deficient cells in response to different injected currents (Figures 3C, 3D, and S6). These observations strongly suggest altered electrophysiological properties in NCDN-deficient and differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, consistent with seizures in mice with conditional depletion of Ncdn.

We then sought to investigate the expression pattern of NCDN in human fetal cortex by using available and previously published data.30 In this data, we observed that NCDN expression is enriched in excitatory neural cells defined by NEUROD6 (MIM: 611513) expression (Figure 3E). Specifically, the expression of NCDN is predominantly found in maturing excitatory neurons (mENs), defined by expression of the glutamate ionotropic receptor gene GRIN2B (MIM:138252), but not in immature excitatory neurons (iENs), defined by NRP1 (MIM: 602069) expression (Figure 3F).30 Similarly, analysis of GRM5 expression showed expression levels confined to the mEN stage (Figures 3E and 3F). These data show that NCDN is highly expressed in mENs of the fetal cortex together with GRM5, consistent with interactions between NCDN and mGluR5.

Our series of six affected individuals with NCDN variants shared several core NDD features such as learning disability and ID, delayed speech development, and variable degrees of reduced head circumference. While all four NCDN variants failed to rescue the impaired neurite formation in NCDN-depleted SH-SY5Y cells, the inheritance, onset, severity, and combination of symptoms varied between families without shared distinctive clinical features among affected individuals. The three siblings (F1:II.1, F1:II.2, and F1:II.3) with a bi-allelic NCDN variant c.1297G>C presented with a uniform phenotype with growth retardation, mild ID, and sporadic or febrile seizures. Their heterozygous parents had neither neurological symptoms nor cognitive impairment. Individual F2:II.1, carrying a heterozygous de novo variant c.1433G>A, showed a similar mild ID and speech delay but no seizures. On the other hand, individuals F3:II.1 and F4:II.1 with the de novo variants c.1492T>C and c.1955C>T, respectively, showed a more severe form of developmental delay with an earlier onset, moderate to severe ID, and epileptic spasms in our series of patients. Interestingly, in vitro expression of the c.1492T>C and c.1955C>T variants, situated in the mGluR5-interacting domain,14,28 interfered with mGluR5-induced ERK phosphorylation in our assay. On the basis of a combination of our clinical observations and experimental data, it is thus tempting to speculate that the c.1297G>C and c.1433G>A variants, without ability to promote neurite formation and with no detectable effects on ERK phosphorylation in our assays, alter NCDN functions in slightly different ways than the c.1492T>C and c.1955C>T variants, showing a reduced mGluR5-mediated ERK phosphorylation (Figure 3A). In a prior report, three individuals were identified with heterozygous de novo deletions spanning 1.1 Mb to 3.1 Mb involving NCDN.31 The three affected individuals presented with mild to moderate ID and motor and speech delay. However, seizures were not reported, suggesting that NCDN haploinsufficiency does not necessarily cause epilepsy. It may therefore be hypothesized that the seizures, associated with three missense variants in our study, define a sub-phenotype mediated by a dominant-negative effect. The variant NCDN allele c.1297G>C in family 1 should in such a case be hypomorphic to explain the silent phenotype in heterozygous parents. The nucleotide position c.1297G has a lower phastCons score (0.884) and the corresponding aa residue is more tolerated (MetaDome tolerance score) when compared with the aa residues corresponding to the three positions c.1433G, c.1492T, and c.1955C, consistent with hypomorphism as a plausible explanation. Domain-specific missense variants leading to alternate mechanisms and phenotypic pleiotropy have recently been reported. Specific bi-allelic variants in the transcription factor gene DEAF1 (MIM: 602635) appear to cause hypomorphic loss-of-function alleles, whereas some heterozygous de novo variants have a dominant-negative (antimorph) effect.32 In TRIO (MIM: 609701), encoding a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, domain-specific missense variants mediate either haploinsufficiency or gain of function leading to distinct phenotypes.33 Similar to DEAF1 and TRIO, NCDN interacts with multiple proteins and impacts different functions of the central nervous system.13,34,35 We therefore suggest that the four different missense variants may cause distinct and domain-specific changes of NCDN functions, ultimately leading to the phenotypic variability. A detailed understanding on how the identified NCDN variants interfere with binding to different protein partners will now require further investigations.

In conclusion, we identified four different missense variants in NCDN that are functionally relevant in six individuals presenting with a variable degree of neurodevelopmental delay, ID, and seizures. Five out of the six affected individuals were diagnosed with variable types of epilepsy, a core phenotypic feature of NDD with a 10-fold increased prevalence in individuals with ID compared with the general population.36 Three NCDN variants occurred de novo, whereas one variant segregated in a bi-allelic state in three siblings with a uniform clinical presentation. Functional characterization of the four NCDN variants showed that they, in contrast to WT NCDN, were unable to rescue the impaired neurite formation in NCDN-depleted SH-SY5Y cells. Furthermore, mGluR signaling, measured by ERK phosphorylation levels, was compromised by NCDN variants located in the mGluR5-binding domain of the protein in two individuals presenting with severe clinical features of NDD. Despite the functional effects shown for the four NCDN variants in our assays, the precise mechanisms leading to the variable clinical presentations and different inheritance patterns remain elusive. Mice with conditional loss of Ncdn in the central nervous system exhibit learning defects and epilepsy. These features are concordant with the phenotype in five of our affected individuals, however they are not mediated by complete loss of function. Furthermore, large heterozygous deletions in patients with NDD suggest NCDN haploinsufficiency is not associated with epilepsy. However, a dominant-negative effect, in particular of the c.1297G>C and c.1433G>A variants, is plausible and would require the recessive variant c.1297G>C to be hypomorphic. Given that NCDN interacts with multiple partners in the central nervous system during development and that the NCDN variants identified may affect these interactions differently, we therefore hypothesize that the variants interfere with NCDN functions in different ways, ultimately leading to variable clinical features. However, the precise mechanistic explanations for the variable molecular, cellular, and clinical effects of the monoallelic and bi-allelic NCDN variants warrant further investigations, requiring mapping of functional domains of NCDN and its 3D structure.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants and their parents for cooperation. The exomes of family F1 were generated at the Genome platform, Science for Life Laboratory, and cell images were obtained at the BioVis platform, Uppsala University, Sweden. Computations were performed on resources provided by SNIC through Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science (UPPMAX), Uppsala University, Sweden. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (2015-02424 and 2020-01947) to N.D.; Hjärnfonden (FO2019-0210 and FO2020-0171) to N.D.; Science for Life Laboratory to N.D.; Stiftelsen Margarethahemmet to N.D.; Sävstaholm Society to J.H.; Märta Lundqvist’s fund to J.H.; O.E. and E. Johansson’s fund to J.H.; Borgström Foundation to A.F.; Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; JP20ek0109280, JP20dm0107090, JP20ek0109301, JP20ek0109348, and JP20kk0205012) to N.M. and (JP20lk0201069) to M.K.; JSPS KAKENHI (JP17H0153) to N.M., (JP17K10080) to S.M., (JP19K1692) to E.K., and (JP20K08236) to M.K.; intramural research grants for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (30-6) to N.M. and M.K. and (30-7) to N.M.; and The Takeda Science Foundation to N.M. The funders played no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or decision to publish.

Published: March 11, 2021

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.015.

Data and code availability

The NCDN variants with accession numbers are available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ (GenBank: NM_014284.3) for variants c.1297G>C: SCV001443681, c.1433G>A: SCV001443682, c.1492T>C: SCV001443683, and c.1955C>T: SCV001443684. WES datasets have not been deposited in a public repository because of privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on request.

Web resources

Supplemental information

Document S1. Supplemental note, Figures S1–S6, Tables S1–S3, and supplemental methods
mmc1.pdf (3.1MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (5MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Thapar A., Cooper M., Rutter M. Neurodevelopmental disorders. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:339–346. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30376-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vissers L.E.L.M., Gilissen C., Veltman J.A. Genetic studies in intellectual disability and related disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:9–18. doi: 10.1038/nrg3999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tărlungeanu D.C., Novarino G. Genomics in neurodevelopmental disorders: an avenue to personalized medicine. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:100. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0129-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McRae J.F., Clayton S., Fitzgerald T.W., Kaplanis J., Prigmore E., Rajan D., Sifrim A., Aitken S., Akawi N., Alvi M., Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature. 2017;542:433–438. doi: 10.1038/nature21062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coe B.P., Stessman H.A.F., Sulovari A., Geisheker M.R., Bakken T.E., Lake A.M., Dougherty J.D., Lein E.S., Hormozdiari F., Bernier R.A., Eichler E.E. Neurodevelopmental disease genes implicated by de novo mutation and copy number variation morbidity. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:106–116. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0288-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martin H.C., Jones W.D., McIntyre R., Sanchez-Andrade G., Sanderson M., Stephenson J.D., Jones C.P., Handsaker J., Gallone G., Bruntraeger M., Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Quantifying the contribution of recessive coding variation to developmental disorders. Science. 2018;362:1161–1164. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Short P.J., McRae J.F., Gallone G., Sifrim A., Won H., Geschwind D.H., Wright C.F., Firth H.V., FitzPatrick D.R., Barrett J.C., Hurles M.E. De novo mutations in regulatory elements in neurodevelopmental disorders. Nature. 2018;555:611–616. doi: 10.1038/nature25983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaplanis J., Samocha K.E., Wiel L., Zhang Z., Arvai K.J., Eberhardt R.Y., Gallone G., Lelieveld S.H., Martin H.C., McRae J.F., Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature. 2020;586:757–762. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2832-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shinozaki K., Kume H., Kuzume H., Obata K., Maruyama K. Norbin, a neurite-outgrowth-related protein, is a cytosolic protein localized in the somatodendritic region of neurons and distributed prominently in dendritic outgrowth in Purkinje cells. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1999;71:364–368. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(99)00181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu Y., Li Z., Yao L., Zhang X., Gan D., Jiang M., Wang N., Chen G., Wang X. Altered Norbin Expression in Patients with Epilepsy and a Rat Model. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13970. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13248-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang H., Nong Y., Bazan F., Greengard P., Flajolet M. Norbin: A promising central nervous system regulator. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2010;3:487–490. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.6.12844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shinozaki K., Maruyama K., Kume H., Kuzume H., Obata K. A novel brain gene, norbin, induced by treatment of tetraethylammonium in rat hippocampal slice and accompanied with neurite-outgrowth in neuro 2a cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;240:766–771. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pan D., Barber M.A., Hornigold K., Baker M.J., Toth J.M., Oxley D., Welch H.C.E. Norbin stimulates the catalytic activity and plasma membrane localization of the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor P-Rex1. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:6359–6375. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.686592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang H., Westin L., Nong Y., Birnbaum S., Bendor J., Brismar H., Nestler E., Aperia A., Flajolet M., Greengard P. Norbin is an endogenous regulator of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 signaling. Science. 2009;326:1554–1557. doi: 10.1126/science.1178496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dateki M., Horii T., Kasuya Y., Mochizuki R., Nagao Y., Ishida J., Sugiyama F., Tanimoto K., Yagami K., Imai H., Fukamizu A. Neurochondrin negatively regulates CaMKII phosphorylation, and nervous system-specific gene disruption results in epileptic seizure. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:20503–20508. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414033200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang H., Warner-Schmidt J., Varela S., Enikolopov G., Greengard P., Flajolet M. Norbin ablation results in defective adult hippocampal neurogenesis and depressive-like behavior in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:9745–9750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510291112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Siepel A., Bejerano G., Pedersen J.S., Hinrichs A.S., Hou M., Rosenbloom K., Clawson H., Spieth J., Hillier L.W., Richards S. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 2005;15:1034–1050. doi: 10.1101/gr.3715005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sobreira N., Schiettecatte F., Valle D., Hamosh A. GeneMatcher: a matching tool for connecting investigators with an interest in the same gene. Hum. Mutat. 2015;36:928–930. doi: 10.1002/humu.22844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Philippakis A.A., Azzariti D.R., Beltran S., Brookes A.J., Brownstein C.A., Brudno M., Brunner H.G., Buske O.J., Carey K., Doll C. The Matchmaker Exchange: a platform for rare disease gene discovery. Hum. Mutat. 2015;36:915–921. doi: 10.1002/humu.22858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wiel L., Baakman C., Gilissen D., Veltman J.A., Vriend G., Gilissen C. MetaDome: Pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains. Hum. Mutat. 2019;40:1030–1038. doi: 10.1002/humu.23798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Petrovski S., Wang Q., Heinzen E.L., Allen A.S., Goldstein D.B. Genic intolerance to functional variation and the interpretation of personal genomes. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Santillo S., Schiano Moriello A., Di Maio V. Electrophysiological variability in the SH-SY5Y cellular line. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2014;33:121–129. doi: 10.4149/gpb_2013071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rønn L.C.B., Ralets I., Hartz B.P., Bech M., Berezin A., Berezin V., Møller A., Bock E. A simple procedure for quantification of neurite outgrowth based on stereological principles. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2000;100:25–32. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00228-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shteinfer-Kuzmine A., Argueti S., Gupta R., Shvil N., Abu-Hamad S., Gropper Y., Hoeber J., Magrì A., Messina A., Kozlova E.N. A VDAC1-Derived N-Terminal Peptide Inhibits Mutant SOD1-VDAC1 Interactions and Toxicity in the SOD1 Model of ALS. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019;13:346. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu Y.M., Jia Z., Janus C., Henderson J.T., Gerlai R., Wojtowicz J.M., Roder J.C. Mice lacking metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 show impaired learning and reduced CA1 long-term potentiation (LTP) but normal CA3 LTP. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:5196–5205. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-05196.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu H.J., Alter B.J., Carrasquillo Y., Qiu C.S., Gereau R.W., 4th Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 modulates nociceptive plasticity via extracellular signal-regulated kinase-Kv4.2 signaling in spinal cord dorsal horn neurons. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:13181–13191. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0269-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Uematsu K., Heiman M., Zelenina M., Padovan J., Chait B.T., Aperia A., Nishi A., Greengard P. Protein kinase A directly phosphorylates metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 to modulate its function. J. Neurochem. 2015;132:677–686. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sergin I., Jong Y.I., Harmon S.K., Kumar V., O’Malley K.L. Sequences within the C terminus of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) are responsible for inner nuclear membrane localization. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:3637–3655. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.757724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kalinowska M., Francesconi A. Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Interacting Proteins: Fine-Tuning Receptor Functions in Health and Disease. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2016;14:494–503. doi: 10.2174/1570159X13666150515234434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nowakowski T.J., Bhaduri A., Pollen A.A., Alvarado B., Mostajo-Radji M.A., Di Lullo E., Haeussler M., Sandoval-Espinosa C., Liu S.J., Velmeshev D. Spatiotemporal gene expression trajectories reveal developmental hierarchies of the human cortex. Science. 2017;358:1318–1323. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tokita M.J., Chow P.M., Mirzaa G., Dikow N., Maas B., Isidor B., Le Caignec C., Penney L.S., Mazzotta G., Bernardini L. Five children with deletions of 1p34.3 encompassing AGO1 and AGO3. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015;23:761–765. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nabais Sá M.J., Jensik P.J., McGee S.R., Parker M.J., Lahiri N., McNeil E.P., Kroes H.Y., Hagerman R.J., Harrison R.E., Montgomery T. De novo and biallelic DEAF1 variants cause a phenotypic spectrum. Genet. Med. 2019;21:2059–2069. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0473-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barbosa S., Greville-Heygate S., Bonnet M., Godwin A., Fagotto-Kaufmann C., Kajava A.V., Laouteouet D., Mawby R., Wai H.A., Dingemans A.J.M., C4RCD Research Group Opposite Modulation of RAC1 by Mutations in TRIO Is Associated with Distinct, Domain-Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020;106:338–355. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ohoka Y., Hirotani M., Sugimoto H., Fujioka S., Furuyama T., Inagaki S. Semaphorin 4C, a transmembrane semaphorin, [corrected] associates with a neurite-outgrowth-related protein, SFAP75. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001;280:237–243. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Francke F., Ward R.J., Jenkins L., Kellett E., Richter D., Milligan G., Bächner D. Interaction of neurochondrin with the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 interferes with G protein-coupled signal transduction but not agonist-mediated internalization. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:32496–32507. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602889200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.McGrother C.W., Bhaumik S., Thorp C.F., Hauck A., Branford D., Watson J.M. Epilepsy in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, associations and service implications. Seizure. 2006;15:376–386. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Supplemental note, Figures S1–S6, Tables S1–S3, and supplemental methods
mmc1.pdf (3.1MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (5MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The NCDN variants with accession numbers are available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ (GenBank: NM_014284.3) for variants c.1297G>C: SCV001443681, c.1433G>A: SCV001443682, c.1492T>C: SCV001443683, and c.1955C>T: SCV001443684. WES datasets have not been deposited in a public repository because of privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on request.


Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES