Selective expansion of regulatory T cells using an orthogonal IL-2/IL-2 receptor system facilitates transplantation tolerance

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of Tregs has been shown to improve alloengraftment in animal models. However, it is technically challenging to expand Tregs ex vivo for the purpose of infusing large numbers of cells in the clinic. We demonstrate an innovative approach to engineering an orthogonal IL-2/IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) pair, the parts of which selectively interact with each other, transmitting native IL-2 signals, but do not interact with the natural IL-2 or IL-2R counterparts, thereby enabling selective stimulation of target cells in vivo. Here, we introduced this orthogonal IL-2R into Tregs. Upon adoptive transfer in a murine mixed hematopoietic chimerism model, orthogonal IL-2 injection significantly promoted orthogonal IL-2R⁺Foxp3^GFP+CD4⁺ cell proliferation without increasing other T cell subsets and facilitated donor hematopoietic cell engraftment followed by acceptance of heart allografts. Our data indicate that selective target cell stimulation enabled by the engineered orthogonal cytokine receptor improves Treg potential for the induction of organ transplantation tolerance.

Introduction

Organ transplantation is a highly effective solution for end-stage organ failure. Current immunosuppressive agents successfully improve long-term graft survival. However, lifelong immunosuppression results in life-threatening comorbidities and poor efficacy in preventing chronic allograft rejection. Induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism is one of the most reliable approaches to reproducibly achieving long-term allograft acceptance without maintenance immunosuppression in clinical kidney transplantation (1). However, it remains challenging to achieve donor hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engraftment long term across MHC barriers with reduced intensity preconditioning.

In clinical trials of combined kidney and HSC transplant, patients who developed organ tolerance showed enrichment of Tregs at early time points after transplant (2–4). Therefore, it is hypothesized that Tregs play a pivotal role in mixed chimerism induction. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that Treg transfer promoted HSC engraftment in murine mixed chimerism models (5–11), implying that Treg transfer with the goal of mixed chimerism induction could be an effective strategy to achieve long-term organ transplantation tolerance. However, due to the paucity of Tregs and the likely requirement of large numbers of cells for establishing a tolerogenic milieu in nonmyeloablated hosts (12), exclusive transfer of Tregs alone is unlikely to be sufficient to achieve this goal.

IL-2 is essential for Treg generation, survival, stability, and function (13, 14). The IL-2 receptor complex (IL-2R) has 3 distinct subunits, designated IL-2Rα (CD25), IL-2Rβ (CD122), and common γ chain (CD132, γc). Although CD25 does not participate in signaling, CD25/IL-2 binary complex increases the affinity of IL-2 for IL-2Rβ, then recruits γc, leading to intracellular signaling in part via the JAK/STAT pathway. Since Tregs constitutively express CD25, they are more sensitive to IL-2 stimulation compared with the other immune cell populations, such as conventional T cells (Tcons) and NK cells, which express CD25 only when they are activated. Based on this discrepancy of IL-2 susceptibility, low-dose IL-2 therapy has been utilized for the treatment of patients with steroid refractory graft-versus-host diseases (GvHDs) or autoimmune diseases. Although substantial expansion of endogenous Tregs and therapeutic benefits have been observed (15–17), the impact of IL-2 on other cell populations can result in toxicities (18). IL-2/anti–IL-2 antibody complex or fusion protein has also been developed with the purpose of reducing affinity of IL-2 to IL-2Rβ to selectively stimulate CD25⁺ Tregs (19, 20). In a murine BM transplantation (BMT) model, IL-2/anti–IL-2 complex administration ameliorated chronic GvHD upon combination with adoptive Treg transfer. However, in an acute GvHD model, IL-2/anti-IL-2 complex administration abrogated the therapeutic effect of adoptively transferred Tregs by expanding Tcons (21). IL-2/anti–IL-2 antibody complex also activated NK and CD8⁺ T cells in murine mixed chimerism induction models and caused engraftment failure (22). Those data collectively suggest that a more selective approach is required for enhancing Treg function for regulating immune reactions.

The orthogonal IL-2 (ortho IL-2) system was developed as a strategy for selectively expanding specific cell populations. This cytokine does not bind to WT IL-2Rβ even in the presence of CD25, whereas it does bind to its specific engineered counterpart: ortho IL-2Rβ (23–25). Prior work demonstrated the efficacy of this approach in Tcons with selective proliferation of ortho IL-2Rβ–transduced T cells in vivo following ortho IL-2 administration. Since the interaction of ortho IL-2 with ortho IL-2Rβ is enhanced in the presence of CD25, we presumed that the ortho IL-2 system can more specifically and robustly contribute to Treg proliferation compared with that of Tcons. Here, we implemented ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Treg adoptive transfer into a murine mixed hematopoietic chimerism induction model. We demonstrate that ortho IL-2 administration selectively expanded ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs, improved donor HSC engraftment, and led to organ transplantation tolerance.

Results

ortho IL-2Rβ–transduced Tregs show selective expansion by ortho IL-2 stimulation in vitro.

Foxp3^GFP+ BALB/c mice were utilized as Treg donors to purify Foxp3⁺ Tregs. Isolated Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs were expanded as previously reported (26). The ortho IL-2Rβ construct labeled with turboRFP (tRFP) was retrovirally transduced into Tregs during this expansion phase. After 1 week of culture, Tregs expanded 7.1 ± 4.3–fold (mean ± SD), with 30.8% ± 12.3% transduction efficiency (Supplemental Figure 1, A–C; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI139991DS1). Manipulated cells maintained Foxp3^GFP expression more than 99% (Supplemental Figure 1D). The transduction process had no negative impact on cell expansion compared with cells cultured without viral vector (Supplemental Figure 1E). To validate the biological activity of cells transduced with tRFP/ortho IL-2Rβ, transduced Tregs were stimulated with WT or ortho IL-2 at the indicated concentrations. The expression level of CD25, inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS), and the proliferation of tRFP⁺ and tRFP^– fraction were compared (Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 2). WT IL-2 stimulation resulted in upregulation of CD25 expression (Figure 1B) and promoted cell proliferation (Figure 1C) in both tRFP⁺ and tRFP^– fractions, indicating that transduced cells retain responsiveness to WT IL-2. Ortho IL-2 stimulation upregulated CD25 expression and promoted proliferation of the tRFP⁺ fraction with only minimal impact on the tRFP^– fraction (Figure 1, B–D). Οrtho IL-2 stimulation also upregulated expression levels of ICOS, which endows Tregs with stronger suppressive function (27). To further assess the crossreactivity of ortho IL-2 on WT IL-2R, we stimulated WT Tregs that were expanded without viral vectors with ortho IL-2 (Supplemental Figure 3). WT Tregs did not respond to ortho IL-2 stimulation, demonstrating exquisite cytokine-receptor specificity. Ortho IL-2 was previously shown to be significantly less potent for STAT5 phosphorylation and cell growth compared with WT IL-2 for both Tcons and Tregs in vitro. In agreement, ortho IL-2 showed less potency to activate tRFP⁺ cells compared with WT IL-2 at low doses (Figure 1D: relative ratio to no IL-2 control at 1 × 10³ IU/mL: CD25 expression level, 2.78 ± 0.11 in WT IL-2, 2.23 ± 0.11 in ortho IL-2: P = 0.0039; cell number: 4.32 ± 0.41 in WT IL-2, 2.25 ± 0.05 in ortho IL-2: P = 0.0115). However, ortho IL-2 increased the effect in a dose-dependent manner and showed comparable or greater effects than WT IL-2 at 1 × 10⁵ IU/mL (Figure 1D: relative ratio at 1 × 10⁵ IU/mL: CD25 expression level, 2.76 ± 0.34 in WT IL-2, 4.05 ± 0.02 in ortho IL-2: P = 0.0220; cell number: 8.96 ± 3.16 in WT IL-2, 8.10 ± 0.36 in ortho IL-2: P = 0.6836). Taken together, these studies demonstrated successful introduction of functional ortho IL-2Rβ into Tregs without compromising expansion of these cells.

Figure 1. Ortho IL-2 stimulation selectively activates and expands Tregs with oIL-2Rβ.

Tregs transduced with tRFP/oIL-2Rβ were stained with violet cell proliferation dye, followed by incubation with CD3/CD28 activation beads at a cell/bead 1:2 ratio. Flow cytometry analyses performed after 4-day culture are shown. Representative pseudocolor plots (A) and histograms (B and C) of Tregs after incubation with no IL-2 (top), WT IL-2 (middle, 1 × 10³ IU/mL), or ortho IL-2 (bottom, 1 × 10⁵ IU/mL); brown gate: tRFP⁺ fraction, black gate: tRFP^– fraction. (D) Relative ratio to no IL-2 control in CD25 MFI, ICOS MFI, and cell number per well of each gated cell with mean plus 95% confidence intervals at each IL-2 concentration. Quantification of triplicate wells from 1 representative experiment of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, calculated between tRFP⁺ and tRFP^–fraction by Welch’s 2-sample t test. WT and ortho IL-2: 1 IU = 312.5 ng.

Ortho IL-2 stimulation does not abrogate Treg suppression in vitro.

To confirm suppressive capacity of ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs after manipulation, Thy1.2⁺ Tregs that were transduced with ortho IL-2Rβ were cocultured with naive Thy1.1⁺ Tcons that were activated with CD3/CD28 beads. Transduced Tregs were not purified and used as mixture of ortho IL-2Rβ^– and ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs (defined as oTregs: ~30% transduction efficiency). Four days later, the phenotypes of Thy1.1⁺ Tcons and oTregs were analyzed by flow cytometry (Supplemental Figure 4). oTreg coculture significantly repressed CD25 and ICOS expression on Thy1.1⁺ Tcons and reduced the proliferation of Thy1.1⁺ Tcons, indicating that oTregs retain suppressive capacities (Figure 2, A–D). It has been reported that Tregs suppress T cell proliferation by IL-2 deprivation and that IL-2 replacement abrogates in vitro Treg suppression (28–30). In agreement with this, adding IL-2 restored CD25 and ICOS expression and proliferation of Thy1.1⁺ Tcons (Figure 2, A–D). Conversely, ortho IL-2 did not affect CD25 expression on Thy1.1⁺ Tcons (Figure 2, A–D), whereas it resulted in an increase in CD25 expression levels on oTregs in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2E). Although ortho IL-2 at high doses (1 × 10⁵ IU/mL) slightly increased Thy1.1⁺ Tcon proliferation (Figure 2D, P = 0.077), the suppressive function of oTregs was sustained (P < 0.001 compared with Tcons alone). Meanwhile, the number of oTregs significantly increased by ortho IL-2 stimulation in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2F). As a result, ortho IL-2 stimulation skewed the oTreg/Tcon ratio into a Treg-dominant state (Figure 2G: % oTregs: no IL-2, 42.6% ± 6.0%; ortho IL-2, 1 × 10³ IU/mL, 55.7% ± 3.4%; 1 × 10⁴ IU/mL, 61.3% ± 2.2%; 1 × 10⁵ IU/mL, 64.9% ± 0.9%; 1 × 10⁶ IU/mL, 79.3% ± 3.6%). Together, these data confirm that ortho IL-2 stimulation selectively stimulates oTregs in the presence of WT Tcons in vitro.

Figure 2. Ortho IL-2 selectively expands oIL-2Rβ–transduced Tregs without affecting cocultured naive T cells or reducing Treg functions.

Naive Thy1.1⁺ Tcons were cocultured with Thy1.2⁺Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs that were transduced with oIL-2Rβ (oTregs; transduction efficiency was ~30%). Flow cytometry analyses performed after 4-day coculture. (A) Representative histograms show expression levels of CD25 and ICOS and dilution of proliferation dye on Thy1.1⁺ Tcons. (B) Representative pseudocolor plots show the proportion of Foxp3^GFP+ cells (oTreg: upper gate) and CD25^hiThy1.1⁺ Tcons (lower gate). Gray, no IL-2; orange, WT IL-2 (1 × 10³ IU/mL); red, ortho IL-2 (1 × 10⁵ IU/mL). Box plots showing CD25 MFI (C) and percentage of proliferation (D) in Thy1.1⁺ Tcons. Thy1.1⁺ Tcon alone is shown as no suppression control (Treg [–], white box). P values in yellow/red on the columns were calculated between Tcon alone control and coculture at each IL-2 concentration. (E) Box plots showing CD25 MFI in oTregs. (F) Cell number per well relative to no IL-2 control in Thy1.1⁺ Tcons (black line) or oTregs (green line) with mean plus 95% confidence intervals. P values calculated between Thy1.1⁺ Tcons and oTreg at each IL-2 concentration are shown. (G) Box plots showing percentage of oTregs per well. P values were calculated between no IL-2 control and each IL-2 concentration. Quantification of triplicate wells in 1 representative experiment of 3 independent experiments. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Welch’s 2-sample t test. WT and ortho IL-2: 1 IU = 312.5 ng.

Ortho IL-2 stimulation of ortho IL-2Rβ transduced Tregs transmits signals identical to those of native IL-2 signaling pathways.

To understand the downstream pathway activation of ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs following ortho IL-2 stimulation, we conducted transcriptome analysis after ortho IL-2 stimulation. First, we utilized a truncated human epidermal growth factor receptor–tagged (hEGFR-tagged) ortho IL-2Rβ construct to enable the isolation of transduced cells with magnetic beads (Supplemental Figure 5, A and B). Consistent with the tRFP construct, enriched hEGFR⁺ Tregs reacted to ortho IL-2 stimulation in a dose-dependent manner (Supplemental Figure 5C). Enriched ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs were stimulated with WT or ortho IL-2 for 4 hours, and mRNA was extracted and analyzed by high-throughput RNA-Seq. Unsupervised principal component analysis (Figure 3A) demonstrated clustering of unstimulated control samples (no IL-2) away from WT or ortho IL-2–stimulated samples, while cluster of WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated samples overlapped. Pairwise comparison identified 1426 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between no IL-2 and WT IL-2–stimulated samples and 1713 DEGs between no IL-2 and ortho IL-2 (Figure 3B), whereas no single genes passed the DEG thresholds (FC > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05) when comparing WT and ortho IL-2 (Figure 3B). Indeed, 1340 DEGs overlapped between WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated cells (Figure 3C). See Supplemental Data Set 1 for full list of DEGs. Both WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated cells showed upregulation of IL-2–dependent genes, such as Cish, Socs1, Socs2, and Lta (Figure 3, D and E, and ref. 31). Downregulation of Bcl6 was shown in both WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated cells in line with a published report that IL-2 signaling negatively regulates Bcl6 (32). WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated Tregs upregulated Bcl-2 and Myc, which protect cells from apoptosis (33). Both populations of stimulated cells also expressed Tnfrsf18, Il2ra, Lilrb4, Tgfb1, Il10, and Foxp3, which are reported to be related to Treg immunosuppressive function (34). BioPlanet 2019 pathway analysis conducted by Enrichr (35, 36) demonstrated enrichment of DEGs in the pathways related to IL-2/STAT5 signaling in both WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated cells (Figure 3F), implying that ortho IL-2Rβ, together with γc, binds to JAK1 and JAK3 and leads to phosphorylation, which then recruits STAT5a/STAT5b (14, 37). These data collectively demonstrate that ortho IL-2/ortho IL-2Rβ binding in Tregs elicits intracellular signaling through the STAT5 pathway.

Figure 3. RNA-Seq reveals upregulation of transcripts involved in IL-2 signaling after ortho IL-2 stimulation.

Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs were transduced with hEGFR/oIL-2Rβ. hEGFR⁺ cells were enriched by magnetic cell isolation using an anti-hEGFR mAb. Enriched cells were restimulated with WT or ortho IL-2 for 4 hours after overnight IL-2 starvation. (A) Principal component analysis revealed clustering of WT- (orange) and ortho IL-2–stimulated (red) samples away from unstimulated control cells (no IL-2, gray). (B) Scatterplot of mean RPKM values (log₂) in no IL-2 vs. WT IL-2 (left), no IL-2 vs. ortho IL-2 (middle), and WT IL-2 vs. ortho IL-2 (right). (C) Venn diagram showing overlap of DEGs in WT and ortho IL-2–stimulated samples. (D) Volcano plots reveal DEGs in WT- (left) or ortho IL-2–stimulated (right) cells compared with no IL-2. Vertical dashed lines on volcano plots indicate a fold change of ± 1.5. The top 20 most differentially expressed genes are indicated. (E) Heatmap displaying DEGs in IL-2 signaling signature genes among no IL-2–, WT IL-2–, and ortho IL-2–stimulated samples. (F) The top 13 pathways with the smallest adjusted P values in WT IL-2–stimulated cells shown in the BioPlanet 2019 pathway analysis. Pathway analysis of DEGs shown in ortho IL-2–treated cells reveals the same pattern as shown with WT IL-2–treated cells. Plots show the adjusted P values, circle area represents the number of DEGs overlapping with genes in a given pathway, and circle color represents the rich factor reflecting the proportion of DEGs in a given pathway. Data shown are from 1 representative experiment from 3 independent experiments with biological triplicates.

Ortho IL-2 stimulation shows selective expansion of transferred Tregs in vivo.

Anti-CD40L mAb is considered a backbone of many nonmyeloablative mixed chimerism induction regimens in murine and primate models (1, 38). The advantage of anti-CD40L mAb is that blockade of the CD40/CD40L pathway obviates the need for global T cell deletion that is frequently used in other models to achieve alloengraftment (39), but that might also preclude expansion of adoptively transferred Tregs. It was also reported that anti-CD40L mAb facilitated induction of Tregs involved in GvHD prevention and alloengraftment (40, 41).

To evaluate in vivo effect of ortho IL-2 in this system, we transferred oTregs into Thy1.1⁺ BALB/c mice that underwent 3.3 Gy total body irradiation followed by i.p. injection of 0.3 mg anti-CD40L mAbs (Figure 4A). Thereafter, recipient mice were injected with PBS, WT IL-2, or ortho IL-2 once a day, up to day 6 (d6). The Treg phenotype in the spleen on d6 is shown in Figure 4, B and C. Consistent with the in vitro experimental data (Figure 2), ortho IL-2 selectively activated the tRFP⁺ fraction, but not the tRFP^– fraction in oTregs (tRFP⁺ vs. tRFP^– for CD25, P = 0.0006; for ICOS, P = 0.0006; Figure 4, B–D). Although WT IL-2 stimulation increased the number of oTregs in both tRFP⁺ and tRFP^– fractions, it also increased Thy1.1⁺ host cells 3.98 ± 1.13-fold higher over the PBS group (Figure 4E); this was accompanied by upregulation of CD25 that might be exploited for allograft rejection (Figure 4, F and G, and Supplemental Figure 7). In contrast, ortho IL-2–treated mice showed significant increases in the number of tRFP⁺ oTregs (3.68 ± 1.81-fold higher over those treated with PBS, P = 0.0058), whereas the number of tRFP^– oTregs and that of Thy1.1⁺ host cells were not altered (Figure 4E). Consequently, the proportion of total oTregs among host CD45.2⁺ lymphocytes became significantly higher in ortho IL-2–treated animals (ortho IL-2 vs. PBS, P =0.0267; ortho IL-2 vs. WT IL-2, P = 0.0397) (Figure 4, F and G). Despite significant expansion, all Thy1.2⁺ transferred populations sustained Foxp3^GFP expression (Supplemental Figure 6), implying stability of the Treg phenotype after the treatment. Ortho IL-2–treated mice also showed a significant increase in Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs in total body blood (24.6% ± 16.7% in PBS, 58.7% ± 7.0% in ortho IL-2; P = 0.02857) and peripheral lymph nodes (4.30% ± 1.33% in PBS, 7.10% ± 1.93% in ortho IL-2; P = 0.01107; Figure 4H). These data demonstrate that ortho IL-2 can selectively expand transduced Tregs in vivo.

Figure 4. In vivo injection of ortho IL-2 selectively expands oIL-2Rβ–transduced Tregs.

(A) Schematic of in vivo model for mixed chimerism induction. After 3.3 Gy TBI, CD45.2⁺Thy1.1⁺H2^d+ BALB/c mice received Luc⁺CD45.1⁺Thy1.1⁺H2^b+ C57BL/6 BMCs (15 × 10⁶) plus CD45.2⁺Thy1.2⁺H2^d+Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs (1 × 10⁶) that were transduced with oIL-2Rβ (oTreg: transduction efficiency was about 30%). All mice were treated with anti-CD40L (0.3 mg i.p. on d0) followed by i.p. administration of PBS (n = 7), WT IL-2 MSA 25,000 IU/d (n = 7), or ortho IL-2 MSA 25,000 IU/d (n = 7) for 6 days. Spleen, blood, and peripheral lymph nodes were recovered and analyzed by flow cytometry on d6. (B–D) Ortho IL-2 administration increases the population (B) and expression levels of CD25 and ICOS (C and D) on tRFP-positive fraction (brown gate), but not on tRFP-negative fraction (black) of oTregs in the spleen. (E) Box plots showing relative cell number normalized by PBS control mice in Thy1.2⁺Foxp3^GFP+ with (tRFP⁺ oTreg. top) or without (tRFP^– oTreg, middle) IL-2Rβ expression, and Thy1.1⁺ T cells (host T cells, bottom). (F and G) Ortho IL-2 administration increases oTreg population without affecting Thy1.1⁺ T cells. Representative pseudocolor plots of CD45.2⁺ splenocytes (F) and box plots (G). (H) The percentage of oTregs in CD45.2⁺CD4⁺ T cells in total body blood collected from the inferior vena cava and peripheral lymph nodes. Left, representative pseudocolor plots in blood. Right, comparison between PBS- and ortho IL-2–treated mice. Pooled data from 2 independent experiments including 3 to 4 mice per group per each experiment. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, between indicated groups calculated by Mann-Whitney U test for 2-group comparison, Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple group comparison. TBI, total body irradiation; CD40L, CD40 ligand.

oTreg transfer and ortho IL-2 treatment synergistically enhances donor hematopoietic cell engraftment.

To evaluate the effect of ortho IL-2 on BM engraftment, we continued daily WT and ortho IL-2 administration until d14 after oTreg transfer utilizing the same model shown in Figure 4A. Ortho IL-2–treated mice sustained the Foxp3^GFP+ population at significantly higher levels (9.29% ± 4.66%) compared with the other treatment groups at d14 (PBS, 4.24% ± 1.62%, P = 0.0051; WT IL-2, 4.00% ± 1.70%, P = 0.0046; Figure 5, A and B), suggesting ortho IL-2 prolongs the survival of transferred Tregs. WT IL-2 significantly increased the proportion of CD8⁺ T cells (36.9% ± 15.4%), whereas ortho IL-2 did not alter this population compared with the PBS-treated group (PBS, 4.54% ± 1.66%; ortho IL-2, 3.43% ± 1.64%; P = 0.286), indicating the absence of detectable off-target effects in ortho IL-2–treated mice. To validate receptor-cytokine selectivity, we transferred expanded Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs without transduction (untransduced [UT] Tregs) and treated them with ortho IL-2. As expected, ortho IL-2 did not increase Foxp3^GFP+ UT Treg populations (Figure 5, A and B). Donor cell chimerism was assessed as the percentage of donor H2K^b+CD45.1⁺ cells in PBMCs on d14 (Figure 5C). Without Treg transfer, no mice showed donor cell chimerism (defined as donor cells >1%) regardless of IL-2 administration. The impact of Treg transfer alone on donor cell chimerism was not statistically significant compared with the no Treg transferred control group in both UT and oTregs (% donor cells on d14: UT Treg + PBS, 6.57% ± 20.8%, P > 0.9999; oTreg + PBS, 6.18% ± 16.2%, P = 0.6004). Ortho IL-2 injection on UT Tregs did not improve donor cell chimerism (5.12% ± 15.3%, P = 0.1999). Importantly, mice that received oTregs plus ortho IL-2 administration showed a significantly larger percentage of donor cells compared with the no Treg transferred control group (11.2% ± 16.7%, P = 0.0002; Figure 5C). Although the proportion of Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs returned to baseline levels 14 days after ortho IL-2 cessation (on d28, Supplemental Figure 8A), donor BMC engraftment was sustained in the mice that received oTregs + ortho IL-2 administration on d28 (Supplemental Figure 8B; 11.8% ± 15.7%, P = 0.0002 compared with no Treg control animals) and donor cell chimerism was greater than 1% thereafter (Supplemental Figure 8C). Success rate of chimerism induction on d28 (>1% donor cell chimerism) was 60% in oTregs plus ortho IL-2 administration group compared with 10% in those plus PBS administration group.

Figure 5. Ortho IL-2 stimulation increases transferred oTreg population and improves donor cell engraftment.

After 3.3 Gy TBI, CD45.2⁺H2^d+ WT BALB/c mice received Luc⁺CD45.1⁺H2^b+ C57BL/6 BMCs (15 × 10⁶) plus CD45.2⁺H2^d+Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs (1 × 10⁶) that were transduced with oIL-2Rβ (oTreg: transduction efficiency was ~30%) or those expanded without viral vector (UT Tregs). All mice were treated with anti-CD40L (0.3 mg i.p. on d0), followed by i.p. administration of PBS, WT IL-2 MSA, or ortho IL-2 MSA (both IL-2, 25,000 IU/d) for 14 days. Flow cytometry analysis for PBMCs obtained from the tail vein was performed on d14. (A) Representative pseudocolor plots gated by CD45.2⁺H2k^d+CD4⁺ T cells. (B) Box plots showing the percentages of Foxp3^GFP+CD4⁺ (top) and CD8⁺CD45.2⁺ cells (bottom). (C) Box and whiskers with minimum to maximum showing percentages of H2Κ^b+CD45.1⁺ donor cells in PBMCs on d14. Horizontal dotted line indicates 1% of donor cells. ⁺⁺⁺P < 0.001, comparing the mean rank of each column to the mean rank of PBS control without Tregs (gray triangle) by Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons. (D) Representative bioluminescent images for mice that received oTregs showing distribution of engrafted BMCs. Box plots showing total photon flux on d4 (E), d10, and d28 (F). Pooled data from 2 independent experiments including 5 mice per group per each experiment. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, between indicated 2 groups calculated by Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons among the 3 treatment groups or by Mann-Whitney U test between 2 groups.

We also tested mixed chimerism induction in C57BL/6 mice as recipients and BALB/c mice as donors to evaluate the ortho IL-2 effect on NK cells (Supplemental Figure 9A). The facilitation of engraftment and Treg-specific expansion was observed in the ortho IL-2–treated group (Supplemental Figure 9, B and C). WT IL-2 increased the proportion of CD62L^–KLRG1⁺NK1.1⁺ cells that are the effector NK cell phenotype (42), whereas ortho IL-2 did not alter NK cell populations (Supplemental Figure 9, D and E, and Supplemental Figure 10). Chimerism induction on d28 in C57BL/6 mice was 44% (4 out of 9) in the oTreg plus ortho IL-2 group, but only 11% (1 out of 9) in the PBS group.

Ortho IL-2 injection does not interfere with early donor cell distribution and prevents rejection.

To evaluate the effect of IL-2 on the early phase of donor cell distribution, we utilized luc⁺C57BL/6 mice as BM donors and quantified donor cell distribution by bioluminescent imaging (BLI), as previously described (43). Because total flux of photons in BLI reflects the number of engrafted luc⁺ cells, it represents donor cell distribution more sensitively and accurately compared with flow cytometry, especially at the early time points when the numbers of donor-derived PBMCs are low. Indeed, photons on d4 were localized to bones and the spleen, but not distributed in the periphery, indicating that early distribution of donor cells may be difficult to detect by evaluating PBMCs (Figure 5D). WT IL-2 administration significantly reduced total photon flux on d4 compared with PBS (Figure 5E, P = 0.0041), indicating that WT IL-2 accelerated BM rejection. On the other hand, ortho IL-2 administration did not interfere with donor cell distribution (P = 0.5254 vs. PBS). oTreg transfer plus PBS recipients showed higher total photon flux compared with no Treg transfer plus PBS recipients on d10 (P = 0.0007) and d28 (P = 0.0021; Figure 5F), indicating engraftment-facilitating effect of oTregs. Moreover, compared with oTreg plus PBS recipients, oTreg plus ortho IL-2 recipients tended to show greater increases in total photon flux on d10 (P = 0.0892) and revealed a significant increase on d28 (P = 0.0288), suggesting that ortho IL-2 enhanced the potency of oTregs to prevent late-phase BM rejection that is thought to be driven by alloantigen-primed T cells. Supplemental Figure 11 shows time course of total photon flux for individual mice with multiple comparisons of each treatment group compared with no Treg control group at each time point. Consistent with flow cytometry results, UT Treg transfer with or without ortho IL-2 and oTreg transfer plus PBS did not show statistically significant improvement of the engraftment over the control group, whereas oTreg transfer plus ortho IL-2 significantly improved engraftment on d10 and d28. The mice showed sustained mixed chimerism (total flux > 10⁷) over 100 days after BMT (data not shown).

Mice with mixed chimerism accepted allogenic heart transplants from BM donors.

To confirm the establishment of tolerance, we transplanted heart grafts obtained from luciferase⁺H2^b+ donor into the ear pinna of recipient mice 2 months after BMT. To address antigen specificity, we transplanted third-party H2^q+ heart grafts on the opposite ear pinna of mice consecutively after H2^b+ graft acceptance (Figure 6, A–C). Heart-graft survival was monitored by BLI over time (Figure 6A). Tissue viability was verified by electrocardiogram (Supplemental Figure 12). Nonchimeric mice that rejected H2b⁺ donor BMCs by d56 eventually rejected H2b⁺ heart allografts, whereas chimeric mice that had sustained H2b⁺ donor cell engraftment until d56 at the time of heart transplantation accepted donor-derived heart allografts for 90 days (Figure 6B and Supplemental Figure 13). PBS plus oTreg transfer recipients tended to show greater survival compared with PBS without Treg control animals (P = 0.0596). Animals that received ortho IL-2 plus oTreg adoptive transfer showed significant improvement in donor-derived heart allograft survival (P = 0.0003 compared with PBS without Treg control), indicating that ortho IL-2 is capable of improving the function of oTregs for tolerance induction.

Figure 6. Ortho IL-2 treatment facilitates donor-specific heart transplantation tolerance.

Recipients of H2^b+ BMT received heart allografts from luc⁺H2^b+ or luc⁺H2^q+ donor mice 2 months after BMT. (A) Representative bioluminescent images show acceptance or rejection of heart allografts in the mice that developed mixed chimerism (chimeric recipient) and in the mice that rejected H2^b+ BMCs (nonchimeric recipient). Survival curve for H2^b+ heart allograft (B) and H2^q+ heart allografts (C) are shown. P values calculated by log-rank test between indicated 2 groups. (D and E) Recipient mice that received oTregs were sacrificed 30 days after H2^q+ heart transplantation. Negatively isolated T cells were cocultured with host type (H2^d+), third-party type (H2^q+), and BM donor type (H2^b+) stimulator cells, and the percentage of proliferating cells was analyzed by flow cytometry on d4. (D) Representative pseudocolor plots showing dilution of proliferation dye. SSC, side scatter. (E) Box plots for percentages of proliferating cells. Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons calculated among the 3 treatment groups. Pooled data from 2 independent experiments, including 5 mice per group per experiment. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

The third-party H2^q+ graft was rejected in the same manner between chimeric and nonchimeric mice, demonstrating that chimeric recipients are immunocompetent for nondonor antigens. In vitro mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) also showed competent T cell reactions against H2^q+ cells in all treatment groups (Figure 6, D and E, and Supplemental Figure 14). Conversely, T cell reactivity against H2^b+ cells was significantly reduced in the mice that underwent BMT with oTreg transfer plus ortho IL-2 administration compared with those with oTreg transfer plus PBS administration (P = 0.0279).

To elaborate on the relationship between early donor BM engraftment and achievement of organ tolerance, we plotted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting long term donor-derived heart graft survival (> 90 days) by total flux in BMC-BLI at the early time points (Supplemental Figure 15A). We found that donor cell engraftment at d7 predicted heart transplantation tolerance (AUC, 0.940; cut-off total flux, 1.1 × 10⁷). Since total photon flux by BLI on d7 and the percentage of Foxp3^GFP+/CD4 cells on d14 showed positive correlations (Supplemental Figure 15B, R = 0.57), it was postulated that ortho IL-2 facilitated achievement of tolerance through the expansion of transferred Tregs. The positive correlation between early Treg expansion and donor cell chimerism development was also shown in the C57BL/6 model (Supplemental Figure 9, F and G). Taking these data together, we concluded that oTreg plus ortho IL-2 combination therapy has the potential to facilitate the development of donor-specific transplantation tolerance.

Discussion

The utilization of the ortho IL-2/IL-2R pair results in the exquisite selectivity of activating and expanding cell populations harboring the receptor. We previously reported that ortho IL-2 administration delayed tumor growth when it was combined with tumor-specific Tcons transduced with ortho IL-2Rβ (23). Because ortho IL-2 is capable of stimulating target cells without other cells competing for this resource, the efficacy of tumor-growth suppression and survival benefits of ortho IL-2 was superior to that of WT IL-2 even when WT IL-2 was administered at a dose 10 times higher. We have now investigated a paradigm of the ortho IL-2/ortho IL-2R system with the goal of enhancing immune regulation: a facet of the immune system that needs more delicate control. In this report, we assessed the impact of ortho IL-2 on the immune-suppressive potential of ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs. Whereas WT IL-2 increased non-Treg subsets and resulted in rapid BM rejection, ortho IL-2 showed no impact on off-target populations, but increased ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs. Ortho IL-2 treatment facilitated BM engraftment and substantially enhanced donor-specific organ transplantation tolerance, demonstrating that the ortho IL-2 approach is capable of selectively enhancing Treg biological effects with potential clinical benefits.

RNA-Seq analysis demonstrated that ortho IL-2 stimulation upregulated genes involved in STAT5 signaling, including antiapoptotic genes (Bcl-2 and Myc) and Treg-activation genes (Tnfrsf18, Il2ra, Lilrb4, Foxp3), indicating that ortho IL-2 stimulation likely enhances ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Treg survival and activation. Ortho IL-2 stimulation also upregulated Gzmb, which is indispensable for contact-mediated suppression and skin-transplantation tolerance induced by Tregs (44, 45). It is reported that IL-2–mediated STAT5 signaling also contributes to Treg-suppressive functions (46, 47). In line with that, ortho IL-2–stimulated cells showed upregulation of genes critical for Treg immune suppression, including soluble factors, such as TGF-β (Tgfb1) and IL-10 (Il10), and cell surface molecules, such as OX40 (Tnfrsf4), GITR (Tnfrsf18), and ILT3 (Lilrb4). Upregulation of other important surface molecules, such as CTLA-4 (Ctla4) or ICOS (Icos), was not observed, which may be due to the fact that transcripts were evaluated only 4 hours after stimulation to analyze the direct influence of ortho IL-2 on the downstream cascade of STAT5. Indeed, after 4-day incubation with ortho IL-2, ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs showed upregulation of ICOS, which is the surrogate marker for production of IL-10 and TGF-β (48, 49). Similarly, genes for cell cycling or DNA replication were not observed in DEGs analyzed at 4 hours, though we observed promotion of cell proliferation in ortho IL-2–stimulated cells after 4 day culture. Taking these data together, we presume that ortho IL-2 potently provides a variety of signals for cell proliferation, survival, and immune regulation of Tregs.

Tregs bind IL-2 with high affinity due to constitutive expression of CD25. On the basis of this, many preclinical and clinical trials have tested IL-2–based therapies with the goal of preferential Treg activation. In the mixed chimerism induction models, Shatry et al. demonstrated that IL-2/anti–IL-2 antibody complex injection after transplant increased Tregs, inhibited early expansion of anti–donor-specific CD8⁺ T cells, and resulted in the promotion of donor cell engraftment in a minor-mismatched model with 5.5 Gy preconditioning (50). However, it is known that Tcons and NK cells also express CD25 under inflammatory conditions, for example, following transplantation or in autoimmune diseases. Baeyens et al. observed that low-dose IL-2 combined with rapamycin boosted NK cells and failed to cure type 1 diabetes in a murine model (51). Hirakawa et al. reported that low-dose IL-2 activated STAT5 signaling, not only in CD4⁺ Tregs, but also in a CD56^brightCD16^– NK cell subset in chronic GvHD patients (18). Mahr et al. demonstrated that IL-2/anti-IL-2 antibody complex injection exacerbated allograft rejection via NK and CD8⁺ T cell activation in a mixed chimerism induction model of a fully allo combination with 1 Gy preconditioning (22). In the current study, WT IL-2 administration increased the proportion of CD8⁺ T cells, but not that of Tregs. Because the treatment dose of IL-2 in the murine experiments is varied, we also tested a lower dose of WT IL-2 (2500 IU/d) in our model, where we also observed an increase in the percentage of CD8⁺ T cells (data not shown). In contrast, ortho IL-2–treated mice did not show CD8⁺ T cell increases. WT IL-2 administration resulted in reduction of BMC signals on BLI on d4. This rapid BM rejection is thought to be driven by activated NK cells that are resistant in the short term to irradiation (52). In contrast, ortho IL-2 did not interfere with early marrow engraftment, consistent with the absence of NK cell activation after ortho IL-2 stimulation.

The principal mechanism of tolerance induction is thought to be the deletion of alloreactive T cells by donor cells that migrate to the host thymus and perhaps other lymphoid tissues (53). However, in several murine mixed hematopoietic chimerism models with reduced intensity preconditioning, treatment with anti-CD25 mAb, anti–L-2 mAb (54–56), or tacrolimus that abrogates Treg function (57) in the induction phase precluded HSC engraftment, implying that Tregs play a nonredundant role in the induction phase of mixed chimerism when clonal deletion is not completed. This Treg function is not dependent on MHC recognition because adoptively transferred Tregs that were obtained from or primed by a third party retained the ability to facilitate alloengraftment (58). Fujisaki et al. reported that host Tregs colocalized with transplanted syngenic or allogenic HSCs and Treg depletion prevented persistence of donor HSCs in the long term (59). Pierini and Nishikii et al. reported that host Tregs were necessary for B cell lymphopoiesis after HSC transplantation (60). Müller et al. reported that host Tregs facilitate donor HSC engraftment by promoting cell cycling and mobilization of endogenous HSC, thereby making available open niche space for incoming donor HSCs (43). These data collectively suggest that Tregs might have potential to provide a privileged site in the BM niche that protects HSCs from immune attack. In the current study, although the percentages of Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs returned to baseline levels 14 days after ortho IL-2 cessation, the majority of chimeric mice maintained donor cell chimerism and established heart allograft tolerance. It has been reported that deletion of Tregs in the maintenance phase does not cause HSC rejection (54–56), implying that the role of Tregs is not essential in the maintenance of hematopoietic chimerism after the establishment of clonal deletion. However, Shinoda et al. reported that transient depletion of both donor- and host-derived Tregs in the maintenance phase of mixed chimerism (>100 days after induction) resulted in skin allograft rejection, whereas hematopoietic chimerism was sustained, suggesting that Tregs are important to maintain tolerance against tissue-specific minor antigens that are expressed on the organ graft but not on HSCs (61). Pilat et al. reported that adoptively transferred Tregs were recruited into the heart allograft and reduced the incidence of chronic allograft rejection (6, 11), suggesting the presence of a long-term benefit of adoptive Treg transfer. In the current study, we cannot assess direct impact of ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ Tregs on organ graft because heart transplantation was not performed simultaneously with Treg transfer plus ortho IL-2 administration and Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs were not observed in the peripheral blood at the time of heart transplantation. Optimal treatment duration in the presence of organ allograft will require further investigation.

We demonstrated here that transducing the ortho IL-2Rβ into host-derived Tregs followed by treatment with the ortho IL-2 cytokine enables the selective stimulation and expansion of Tregs without off-target effects. The selective proliferation of Tregs improved alloengraftment, which was followed by establishment of organ transplantation tolerance. Our approach might resolve off-target effects that represent a major limitation for IL-2–based therapies. The limitation of this strategy is that it requires ex vivo manipulation of Tregs, which is not necessary for other IL-2 therapies. However, because the number of Tregs available from patients is limited, ex vivo expansion is helpful for Treg therapy, especially for the patients who are not candidates for toxic cytoreductive preconditioning (e.g., organ-transplant recipients). Furthermore, ortho IL-2R also could be incorporated with other cell-engineering strategies, such as TCR engineering, which endows Tregs’ antigen specificity and enhances their immune-suppressive capacity (25). Ortho IL-2 technology might open a new prospect of Treg-based therapy for organ transplantation tolerance.

Methods

Animals.

Eight- to twelve-week-old BALB/cJ mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. FVB/N- and C57BL/6-L2G85 mice that express the luciferase gene (luc⁺) were generated as described previously (62, 63). We purchased and bred BALB/c mice with a GFP reporter, expressed in conjunction with transcription factor Foxp3 (C.Cg-Foxp3^tm2tch/J; Foxp3^GFP+ BALB/c) to facilitate enrichment of highly pure Tregs.

Treg sorting and culture.

Single-cell suspensions were obtained from cervical, brachial, axillary, inguinal, and mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens of Foxp3^GFP+ BALB/c mice. Following FcR block (Miltenyi Biotec), cells were incubated with Pacific blue–conjugated anti-CD4 (GK1.5), allophycocyanin-conjugated (APC-conjugated) anti-CD8a (53–6.7), and phycoerythrin-conjugated (PE-conjugated) anti-CD25 (PC61.5) (all BioLegend) and using the LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After washing, cells were incubated with anti-PE MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec), and PE-positive cells were enriched by magnet column isolation. Thereafter, CD4⁺CD8^–CD25^hiFoxp3^GFP+ live cells were purified by FACS using the Aria II (BD). Isolated cells were resuspended into conditioning media (RPMI 1640 supplemented with l-glutamine [2 mM], penicillin [100 U/mL], streptomycin [0.1 mg/mL], 2-mercaptoethanol [5 × 10^–5 M], and 10% FCS). Cells were inoculated together with CD3/CD28 T cell activation beads (Invitrogen) at a 1:1 ratio in the presence of 1,000 IU/mL recombinant human IL-2 (hIL-2, teceleukin, Roche) on 96-well flat plates. hIL-2 was replenished on d2.

Treg transduction.

Retroviral supernatant was placed on 24-well plates coated with RetroNectin (Takara). Supernatant was removed after 2 to 3 hours of centrifugation at 2000g at 32°C. Preactivated Tregs were recovered and inoculated into the virus-loaded plates together with refreshed hIL-2 (1,000 IU/mL) and CD3/CD28 beads (1: 3 cell to beads ratio) and incubated for 72 hours at 37°C. hIL-2 was replenished on d2. UT Tregs were cultured on a virus-unloaded plate under the same conditions. Transduction efficiency was determined by tRFP⁺ cells by flow cytometry (LSRII; BD).

RNA-Seq.

Transduced Foxp3^GFP+ Tregs were inoculated with CD3/CD28 beads and 1,000 IU/mL hIL-2. Forty-eight hours later, cells were recovered and hEGFR-ortho IL-2Rβ⁺ cells were isolated by magnetic isolation. Sorted cells were incubated overnight in the conditioning media without hIL-2. After IL-2 starvation, cells were incubated for 4 hours with 2 × 10⁴ IU/mL WT IL-2 or 2 × 10⁶ IU/mL ortho IL-2. Control cells were incubated without IL-2 (no IL-2). Total RNA was isolated using the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research) with oncolumn DNase digestion. RNA-Seq libraries were prepared using 100 ng of total RNA and the KAPA mRNA HyperPrep Kit (Kapa Biosystems). Each library was indexed using barcoded primers (BIOO Scientific) and was amplified for 10 to 12 cycles. Then, 250 to 350 bp fragments of barcoded PCR products were separated by 2% E-Gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific), purified by Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research), and quantified by Qbit. Equal amounts of each library were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 or NovaSeq platform.

BMT and BLI.

WT (CD45.2⁺Thy1.2⁺) or Thy1.1⁺ congenic marker transgenic (CD45.2⁺Thy1.1⁺) BALB/c mice were irradiated at 3.3 Gy 4 hours before BM cell (BMC) transfer. BM was collected from femurs and vertebraes of Luc⁺C57BL/6 mice. Suspended BMCs were passed through a 70 μm mesh, and red blood cells were removed with ACK lysing buffer (Lonza). BM T cells were not removed in this study. BMCs were suspended in PBS and injected at 15 × 10⁶ cells/mouse together with recovered expanded Tregs (1 × 10⁶). Anti-CD40L (MR1; BioXcell) was diluted with PBS and injected i.p. at 0.3 mg/mouse right after BMC transfer. WT or ortho IL-2 MSA was diluted with PBS and injected i.p. at 25,000 IU/dose daily from d0 to d14. BLI was performed as described previously (43) on d4, d7, d10, d14, d21, and d28 after BMT. Briefly, d-Luciferin Firefly (Biosynth) was injected i.p. 10 minutes prior to acquisition with Ami Imager, and images were analyzed with Aura software (Spectral Instruments Imaging).

Flow cytometry.

Six days after BMT, mice were sacrificed and single-cell suspensions were obtained from whole blood, lymph nodes, and spleen. Blood cells were removed with ACK and subsequently incubated with Fc-block reagent, followed by staining with the following antibody cocktails purchased from BioLegend: CD45.1 (clone A20), CD45.2 (clone 104), Thy1.1 (clone OX7), Thy1.2 (clone 53-2.1), TCR-β (clone H57-597), CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD8a (clone 53-6.7), CD19 (clone 6D5), CD25 (clone PC61), and ICOS (clone C398.4A). For blood chimerism analysis, blood samples were obtained from the tail tip and suspended into heparin-PBS. After lysins red blood cells, cells were incubated with H2K^d (clone SF1-1.1.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific), H2K^b (clone AF6-88.5), CD45.1, CD45.2, TCR-β, CD4, CD8a, CD19, CD25, Gr1 (clone RB6-8C5), and CD11b (clone M1/70) (all BioLegend). Cells were acquired by LSRII (BD), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (BD).

All original RNA-Seq data were deposited in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO GSE166713) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE166713

Additional methods are provided in Supplemental Methods.

Statistics.

Statistical differences were calculated with Welch’s 2-sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test for 2-group comparison and Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple comparisons by R version 3.6.1. Repeated measures 2-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test for time-course analysis for BLI and log-rank test for heart graft survival were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 8.3.0 (GraphPad Software, LCC).

Study approval.

Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Stanford University.

Author contributions

TH conceived and designed experiments. TH conducted the experiments with help from PYL, TLR, FS, MM, and JKL. TLR and PYL performed experiments for the revised manuscript. JB, LLS, and SBW conducted production of retroviral vectors. LKP conducted production of IL-2 proteins. JXL, PL, and WJL performed and analyzed RNA-Seq data. KS performed and analyzed murine ECG. LLS, BRB, KCG, and RSN helped with critical advice and discussion. TH and RSN wrote the manuscript with contribution from all authors.

Version 1. 04/15/2021

Electronic publication

Version 2. 04/21/2021

Added Supplemental Data Set file for DEGs and provided link to RNA-Seq data.

Version 3. 04/22/2021

Corrected author name, Sara Bolivar-Wagers.