Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2021 Feb 19;77(Pt 3):266–269. doi: 10.1107/S205698902100181X

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 3-[(1E)-(4-{4-[(E)-(3-hy­droxy­benzyl­idene)amino]­phen­oxy}phenyl­imino)­meth­yl]phenol

Shaaban K Mohamed a,b, Joel T Mague c, Mehmet Akkurt d, Farouq E Hawaiz e, Sahar M I Elgarhy f, Elham A Al-Taifi g,*
PMCID: PMC8061113  PMID: 33953949

In the crystal, the mol­ecule of the title compound has crystallographically imposed twofold rotation symmetry. The crystal packing consists of layers parallel to the ab plane formed by O—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Keywords: crystal structure, hydrogen bond, phenol, aromatic ether, phen­oxy, azomethines, Hirshfeld surface analysis

Abstract

In the crystal, the mol­ecule of the title compound, C26H20N2O3, has crystallographically imposed twofold rotation symmetry. The crystal packing consists of layers parallel to the ab plane formed by O—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Between the layers, C—H⋯π inter­actions are observed.

Chemical context  

Several Schiff bases have been reported for their significant biological activities such as anti­tumor (Mansouri et al., 2013), anti-inflammatory (Shukla & Mishra, 2019), anti­bacterial (Van Zee & Coates, 2015) or anti­microbial (Pagadala et al., 2015). Schiff bases are also used as versatile components in nucleophilic addition with organometallic reagents and in cyclo­addition reactions (Mohan et al., 2012). These findings prompted us to investigate the crystal structure of the title compound.graphic file with name e-77-00266-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The mol­ecule of the title compound has crystallographically imposed twofold rotation symmetry (Fig. 1). The dihedral angle between the two unique benzene rings is 40.68 (6)° while the dihedral angle between the two central benzene rings is 77.71 (6)°. Bond lengths are typical for this kind of compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The title mol­ecule with labeling scheme and 50% probability ellipsoids [symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, y, −z + Inline graphic].

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, O2—H2A⋯N1 and C5—H5⋯O2 hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into layers parallel to the ab plane (Table 1, Fig. 2). The layers are hold together by C—H⋯π contacts (Table 1, Fig. 3) and by other van der Waals inter­actions (Table 2).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 benzene ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2A⋯N1i 0.972 (19) 1.828 (19) 2.7615 (12) 160.1 (16)
C5—H5⋯O2ii 0.973 (13) 2.431 (14) 3.1121 (14) 126.7 (10)
C12—H11⋯Cg1ii 1.004 (14) 2.986 (15) 3.9882 (12) 178.7 (19)

Symmetry codes: (i) -x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}; (ii) -x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The layer structure viewed along the c-axis direction. The inter­molecular O—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are shown as red and black dashed lines, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Side view of two layers seen along the b-axis direction. Hydrogen bonds and C—H⋯π inter­actions are depicted by dashed lines.

Table 2. Short inter­molecular contacts (Å) in the title structure.

Contact Distance Symmetry operation
H12⋯O1 2.763 (14) 1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z
H6⋯H11 2.53 (2) x, 2 − y, −{1\over 2} + z
C3⋯C6 3.5155 (15) x, −1 + y, z
C6⋯H11 2.892 (15) x, 1 − y, −{1\over 2} + z
C11⋯C11 3.319 (2) {1\over 2} − x, {1\over 2} − y, 1 − z
H11⋯H2 2.40 (3) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z

Hirshfeld surface analysis  

Hirshfeld surface analysis, together with two-dimensional fingerprint plots, is an important tool for visualizing and analyzing inter­molecular contacts in mol­ecular crystals. The corresponding surfaces and fingerprint plots were prepared by CrystalExplorer (Turner et al., 2017). Fig. 4 shows the d norm map for the title mol­ecule, with red spots indicating the positions of H⋯N contacts arising from the O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A view of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface for the title compound, plotted over d norm in the range −1.1242 to 1.4437 a.u.

Fig. 5 shows the two-dimensional fingerprint plots, which give the contributions of inter­molecular contacts to the Hirshfeld surface. The most important contribution to the Hirshfeld surface (41.6%) is from H⋯H contacts. C⋯H/H⋯C and O⋯H/H⋯O inter­actions follow with 28.1% and 13.8% contributions, respectively. Other minor contributors are C⋯C (5.3%), N⋯H/H⋯N (4.8%), O⋯C/C⋯O (3.8%) and N⋯C/C⋯N (2.6%) contacts.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A view of the two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) C⋯H/H⋯C and (d) O⋯H/H⋯O inter­actions. The d i and d e values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface.

Database survey  

Five related compounds with a 4-[(E)-benzyl­idene­amino]­phenol skeleton are: (E)-2-{[(2-amino­phen­yl)imino]­meth­yl}-5-(benz­yloxy)phenol (NIBRIC; Ghichi et al., 2018), (Z)-3-(benz­yloxy)-6-{[(5-chloro-2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)amino]­methyl­idene}cyclo­hexa-2,4-dien-1-one (NIBROI; Ghichi et al., 2018), 2-{(E)-[(2-methyl-3-nitro­phen­yl)imino]­meth­yl}-4-nitro­phenol (AFOPUI; Tanak et al., 2013), 2-[(E)-(2-chloro­phen­yl)imino­meth­yl]-6-methyl­phenol (SABKOX; Zhu et al., 2010) and 2-{[(2,4-di­methyl­phen­yl)imino]­meth­yl}-6-methyl­phenol (MUCDIY; Tanak et al., 2009).

In the crystal of NIBRIC, strong N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds form zigzag chains of mol­ecules along the b-axis direction. Weaker C—H⋯π and offset π–π stacking inter­actions also contribute to the packing. For NIBROI, pairs of strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds form centrosymmetric dimers that enclose Inline graphic(18) rings. These combine with weaker C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, which also generate centrosymmetric dimers, but with Inline graphic(14) motifs. Inversion-related C—H⋯π contacts lead to the formation of sheets of mol­ecules parallel to (120), which are stacked approximately along the b-axis direction. In the crystal of AFOPUI, mol­ecules are linked by C—H⋯O inter­actions, forming two-dimensional sheets parallel to the bc plane. In the structure of SABKOX, the hy­droxy H atom is involved in a strong intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond, generating a S(6) ring. The mol­ecular structure of MUCDIY is stabilized by an intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond, which generates a six membered ring.

Synthesis and crystallization  

Condensation of 1 mmol of 4,4′-oxydibenzaldehyde (226 mg) with 2 mmol of 3-amino­phenol (218 mg) in ethanol under reflux for 4 h afforded the crude product of the title compound. The product was crystallized from ethanol by slow evaporation to obtain good quality crystals for X-ray diffraction. Yield 82%.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. All H atoms were located in a difference-Fourier map and refined freely.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C26H20N2O3
M r 408.44
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 26.8396 (6), 5.1174 (1), 17.2574 (4)
β (°) 121.764 (1)
V3) 2015.27 (8)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.72
Crystal size (mm) 0.25 × 0.06 × 0.06
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 VENTURE PHOTON 100 CMOS
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
T min, T max 0.90, 0.96
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 15449, 1880, 1767
R int 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.609
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.033, 0.086, 1.05
No. of reflections 1880
No. of parameters 182
H-atom treatment All H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.19, −0.16

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902100181X/yk2146sup1.cif

e-77-00266-sup1.cif (486.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902100181X/yk2146Isup2.hkl

e-77-00266-Isup2.hkl (151.6KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902100181X/yk2146Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 2062957

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C26H20N2O3 F(000) = 856
Mr = 408.44 Dx = 1.346 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 26.8396 (6) Å Cell parameters from 9934 reflections
b = 5.1174 (1) Å θ = 3.9–69.8°
c = 17.2574 (4) Å µ = 0.72 mm1
β = 121.764 (1)° T = 150 K
V = 2015.27 (8) Å3 Column, colourless
Z = 4 0.25 × 0.06 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker D8 VENTURE PHOTON 100 CMOS diffractometer 1880 independent reflections
Radiation source: INCOATEC IµS micro–focus source 1767 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromator Rint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1 θmax = 69.8°, θmin = 3.9°
ω scans h = −32→32
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) k = −6→6
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 0.96 l = −20→20
15449 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.086 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.043P)2 + 1.3008P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1880 reflections Δρmax = 0.19 e Å3
182 parameters Δρmin = −0.16 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL 2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0031 (2)

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.500000 1.3874 (2) 0.250000 0.0267 (3)
O2 0.21618 (3) 0.09976 (18) 0.33558 (6) 0.0336 (2)
H2A 0.1966 (8) 0.182 (4) 0.2759 (13) 0.066 (5)*
N1 0.36195 (4) 0.78690 (18) 0.33726 (6) 0.0233 (2)
C1 0.46708 (5) 1.2402 (2) 0.27573 (7) 0.0228 (3)
C2 0.49250 (5) 1.0380 (2) 0.33777 (8) 0.0288 (3)
H2 0.5331 (6) 0.994 (3) 0.3625 (9) 0.035 (3)*
C3 0.45903 (5) 0.8917 (2) 0.36148 (8) 0.0276 (3)
H3 0.4769 (6) 0.743 (3) 0.4038 (9) 0.033 (3)*
C4 0.39966 (4) 0.9482 (2) 0.32294 (7) 0.0220 (3)
C5 0.37512 (5) 1.1545 (2) 0.26182 (7) 0.0244 (3)
H5 0.3337 (6) 1.192 (3) 0.2353 (9) 0.031 (3)*
C6 0.40866 (5) 1.3034 (2) 0.23883 (7) 0.0242 (3)
H6 0.3914 (5) 1.445 (3) 0.1965 (9) 0.030 (3)*
C7 0.38127 (5) 0.6916 (2) 0.41641 (7) 0.0254 (3)
H7 0.4211 (6) 0.744 (3) 0.4696 (10) 0.035 (4)*
C8 0.35036 (5) 0.4960 (2) 0.43754 (7) 0.0238 (3)
C9 0.29481 (5) 0.4001 (2) 0.37197 (7) 0.0242 (3)
H9 0.2735 (5) 0.460 (3) 0.3094 (9) 0.026 (3)*
C10 0.26950 (5) 0.2038 (2) 0.39519 (7) 0.0242 (3)
H10 0.2803 (6) −0.038 (3) 0.4990 (9) 0.030 (3)*
C11 0.29889 (5) 0.1028 (2) 0.48379 (8) 0.0262 (3)
H11 0.3729 (6) 0.127 (3) 0.6118 (10) 0.034 (3)*
C12 0.35320 (5) 0.2004 (2) 0.54851 (8) 0.0278 (3)
H12 0.4190 (6) 0.465 (3) 0.5730 (9) 0.030 (3)*
C13 0.37916 (5) 0.3963 (2) 0.52590 (8) 0.0268 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0298 (6) 0.0206 (5) 0.0400 (6) 0.000 0.0254 (5) 0.000
O2 0.0266 (4) 0.0395 (5) 0.0285 (5) −0.0111 (4) 0.0103 (4) −0.0010 (4)
N1 0.0218 (5) 0.0235 (5) 0.0265 (5) 0.0009 (4) 0.0141 (4) 0.0018 (4)
C1 0.0256 (5) 0.0208 (5) 0.0278 (6) −0.0023 (4) 0.0181 (5) −0.0032 (4)
C2 0.0204 (5) 0.0313 (6) 0.0344 (6) 0.0025 (5) 0.0142 (5) 0.0046 (5)
C3 0.0240 (6) 0.0273 (6) 0.0304 (6) 0.0030 (5) 0.0136 (5) 0.0066 (5)
C4 0.0224 (5) 0.0226 (5) 0.0235 (5) −0.0011 (4) 0.0138 (4) −0.0019 (4)
C5 0.0221 (5) 0.0262 (6) 0.0275 (6) 0.0037 (4) 0.0148 (5) 0.0013 (4)
C6 0.0276 (6) 0.0215 (5) 0.0277 (6) 0.0042 (4) 0.0175 (5) 0.0020 (4)
C7 0.0237 (5) 0.0276 (6) 0.0247 (6) −0.0018 (4) 0.0125 (5) −0.0010 (4)
C8 0.0235 (5) 0.0251 (6) 0.0249 (6) −0.0002 (4) 0.0142 (5) −0.0010 (4)
C9 0.0238 (5) 0.0275 (6) 0.0219 (6) 0.0008 (4) 0.0124 (5) 0.0012 (4)
C10 0.0209 (5) 0.0267 (6) 0.0257 (6) −0.0014 (4) 0.0128 (5) −0.0035 (4)
C11 0.0274 (6) 0.0254 (6) 0.0299 (6) −0.0001 (4) 0.0179 (5) 0.0021 (4)
C12 0.0271 (6) 0.0317 (6) 0.0249 (6) 0.0033 (5) 0.0140 (5) 0.0046 (5)
C13 0.0224 (5) 0.0325 (6) 0.0237 (6) −0.0011 (5) 0.0109 (5) −0.0003 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C1i 1.3992 (12) C5—H5 0.973 (13)
O1—C1 1.3993 (12) C6—H6 0.959 (14)
O2—C10 1.3563 (13) C7—C8 1.4634 (15)
O2—H2A 0.972 (19) C7—H7 1.012 (14)
N1—C7 1.2755 (14) C8—C13 1.3935 (15)
N1—C4 1.4250 (13) C8—C9 1.4028 (15)
C1—C2 1.3831 (16) C9—C10 1.3848 (16)
C1—C6 1.3849 (15) C9—H9 0.967 (13)
C2—C3 1.3865 (16) C10—C11 1.3991 (16)
C2—H2 0.965 (14) C11—C12 1.3812 (16)
C3—C4 1.3961 (15) C11—H10 0.988 (14)
C3—H3 0.988 (15) C12—C13 1.3888 (16)
C4—C5 1.3891 (16) C12—H11 1.004 (14)
C5—C6 1.3871 (15) C13—H12 1.007 (13)
C1i—O1—C1 114.87 (11) N1—C7—C8 124.35 (10)
C10—O2—H2A 113.5 (11) N1—C7—H7 120.7 (8)
C7—N1—C4 118.81 (9) C8—C7—H7 114.9 (8)
C2—C1—C6 120.56 (10) C13—C8—C9 119.77 (10)
C2—C1—O1 120.77 (9) C13—C8—C7 117.53 (10)
C6—C1—O1 118.66 (9) C9—C8—C7 122.65 (10)
C1—C2—C3 120.01 (10) C10—C9—C8 119.69 (10)
C1—C2—H2 119.8 (9) C10—C9—H9 117.3 (8)
C3—C2—H2 120.1 (9) C8—C9—H9 122.9 (8)
C2—C3—C4 120.12 (10) O2—C10—C9 123.21 (10)
C2—C3—H3 119.8 (8) O2—C10—C11 116.53 (10)
C4—C3—H3 120.0 (8) C9—C10—C11 120.26 (10)
C5—C4—C3 119.03 (10) C12—C11—C10 119.88 (10)
C5—C4—N1 118.41 (9) C12—C11—H10 121.0 (8)
C3—C4—N1 122.28 (10) C10—C11—H10 119.1 (8)
C6—C5—C4 120.99 (10) C11—C12—C13 120.38 (10)
C6—C5—H5 120.6 (8) C11—C12—H11 118.1 (8)
C4—C5—H5 118.4 (8) C13—C12—H11 121.5 (8)
C1—C6—C5 119.23 (10) C12—C13—C8 120.02 (10)
C1—C6—H6 120.2 (8) C12—C13—H12 120.2 (8)
C5—C6—H6 120.5 (8) C8—C13—H12 119.8 (8)
C1i—O1—C1—C2 49.26 (9) C4—N1—C7—C8 −171.34 (10)
C1i—O1—C1—C6 −131.68 (11) N1—C7—C8—C13 175.25 (11)
C6—C1—C2—C3 1.91 (17) N1—C7—C8—C9 −2.15 (18)
O1—C1—C2—C3 −179.04 (10) C13—C8—C9—C10 −1.16 (16)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.10 (18) C7—C8—C9—C10 176.18 (10)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.88 (17) C8—C9—C10—O2 −179.55 (10)
C2—C3—C4—N1 173.02 (10) C8—C9—C10—C11 0.54 (16)
C7—N1—C4—C5 −145.80 (11) O2—C10—C11—C12 −179.50 (10)
C7—N1—C4—C3 40.26 (15) C9—C10—C11—C12 0.42 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C6 0.06 (16) C10—C11—C12—C13 −0.76 (17)
N1—C4—C5—C6 −174.08 (10) C11—C12—C13—C8 0.15 (17)
C2—C1—C6—C5 −2.71 (16) C9—C8—C13—C12 0.82 (17)
O1—C1—C6—C5 178.23 (9) C7—C8—C13—C12 −176.66 (10)
C4—C5—C6—C1 1.72 (16)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 benzene ring.

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O2—H2A···N1ii 0.972 (19) 1.828 (19) 2.7615 (12) 160.1 (16)
C5—H5···O2iii 0.973 (13) 2.431 (14) 3.1121 (14) 126.7 (10)
C12—H11···Cg1iii 1.004 (14) 2.986 (15) 3.9882 (12) 178.7 (19)

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y+3/2, −z+1/2.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by National Science Foundation grant 1228232. Tulane University grant .

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2012). DIAMOND, Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2016). APEX3, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Ghichi, N., Benboudiaf, A., Bensouici, C., DJebli, Y. & Merazig, H. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 737–742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Mansouri, T. H., Somaye, S., Nezami, Z. S., Ghahghaei, A. & Najmedini, S. (2013). J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 30, 23–31.
  6. Mohan, C. S., Balamurugan, V., Elayaraja, R. & Prabakaran, A. S. (2012). Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 3, 881–885.
  7. Pagadala, R., Kusampally, U., Rajanna, K. C. & Meshram, J. S. (2015). J. Heterocycl. Chem. 52, 403–410.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  11. Shukla, S. & Mishra, A. P. (2019). Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 12, 1715–1721.
  12. Tanak, H., Erşahin, F., Ağar, E., Yavuz, M. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Tanak, H., Toğurman, F., Kalecik, S., Dege, N. & Yavuz, M. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer. University of Western Australia. http://hirshfeldsurface.net.
  15. Van Zee, N. J. & Coates, G. W. (2015). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2665–2668. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, P., Yu, J., Wang, H., Zhang, C. & Yang, D. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o2460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902100181X/yk2146sup1.cif

e-77-00266-sup1.cif (486.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902100181X/yk2146Isup2.hkl

e-77-00266-Isup2.hkl (151.6KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902100181X/yk2146Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 2062957

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES