Abstract
Acquired cardiovascular conditions are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. A growing number of pregnant women have acquired and heritable cardiovascular conditions and cardiovascular risk factors. As the average age of childbearing women increases, the prevalence of acute coronary syndromes, cardiomyopathy and other cardiovascular complications in pregnancy are also expected to increase. This document, the third of a five-part series, aims to provide practical guidance on the management of such conditions encompassing preconception through acute management and considerations for delivery.
Keywords: cardio-obstetrics, pregnancy, arrythmia, ischemic heart disease, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Condensed Abstract
Acquired cardiovascular conditions are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and the prevalence of acute coronary syndromes, cardiomyopathy and other cardiovascular complications in pregnancy are expected to increase with advancing maternal age. This document, the third of a five-part series, aims to provide practical guidance on the management of such conditions encompassing preconception through acute management and considerations for delivery.
Introduction
Acquired cardiovascular conditions in pregnant women account for the largest proportion of maternal morbidity and mortality, with increasing prevalence (1). Part 3 of this review series will cover cardiovascular conditions predominantly acquired including arrhythmias, cardiomyopathies, hypertensive disorders, and ischemic heart disease. Management of such patients is challenging and requires multidisciplinary discussion among a wide variety of clinicians from maternal fetal medicine to cardiology subspecialties (Central Illustration). This document serves to provide guidance on practical management of these patients from preconception to the peripartum period and beyond.
Central Illustration. Management of Complex Acquired and Heritable Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy & Considerations for Subspecialty Cardiovascular Care.
Cardiovascular subspecialties should be included in the assessment and management of various cardiovascular conditions during pregnancy as illustrated in this figure. PCI – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. MI – Myocardial Infarction. CAD – Coronary Artery Disease. HF – Heart Failure. ASA – Aspirin. ACS – Acute Coronary Syndrome. PPCM – Peripartum Cardiomyopathy. CVD – Cardiovascular Disease.
Arrhythmias
The incidence of arrhythmias during pregnancy is rising and hospitalization for arrhythmia during pregnancy is associated with increased mortality and fetal complications (2). Arrhythmias may develop de novo during pregnancy or pregnancy may exacerbate existing arrhythmias, likely related to hormonal effects. Palpitations during pregnancy are common but do not necessarily correlate with documented arrhythmias on cardiac monitoring.
Preconception Evaluation
Prior history of arrhythmia is the greatest risk factor for arrhythmia during pregnancy (3). Patients should be counseled on risk of recurrence and/or exacerbation of arrhythmia during pregnancy, and of the risks and benefits of potential treatment options, including medications, cardioversion, and ablation. Women who require anticoagulation therapy should be counseled on the potential teratogenicity of warfarin, the lack of safety data for direct oral anticoagulants during pregnancy, and possible need for low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin.
Contraception
Discussion of contraception should occur in a multidisciplinary fashion taking into consideration multiple factors based on the unique risk profile of each woman. Some considerations based on rhythm type and contraceptive type are discussed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Contraception in Patients with History of Arrhythmia
|
General considerations for treatment of arrhythmias in pregnancy
Acute Management of Tachyarrhythmias
Pregnancy should not impede treatment of tachyarrhythmias. Management for the most part should proceed as it would for a non-pregnant patient with unstable rhythm with particular considerations noted in Figure 1. If CPR is required and the uterus is palpable at or above the level of the umbilicus, continuous left uterine displacement should be performed to relieve aortocaval compression (4).
Figure 1. Acute Management of Tachyarrhythmias in Pregnancy.
In general, acute management of tachyarrythmias in pregnancy should be managed per standard protocols with particular considerations during pregnancy as discussed here. ACLS - Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. CV- Cardioversion. VT- Ventricular Tachycardia. SVT- Supra-Ventricular Tachycardia. AF – Atrial Fibrillation
Catheter Ablation
Although catheter ablation is typically avoided during pregnancy, electrophysiological procedures may be performed during pregnancy for arrhythmias refractory to medical therapy with relatively low fetal radiation (5). Contemporary three-dimensional (3-D) mapping systems should be used when possible to minimize fluoroscopy exposure and efforts to reduce necessary radiation exposure such as reduced frame rates should be utilized. Ablation should be performed after the first trimester when possible.
Implantable Devices
The presence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should not deter women from becoming pregnant unless the underlying cardiac disease is considered a contraindication (6). If an indication arises for ICD placement during pregnancy, implantation is recommended with efforts to reduce fluoroscopy exposure, preferably after the first trimester (7,8). Most patients with bradyarrhythmias who do not require permanent pacemaker (PPM) before delivery can be safely managed during labor without temporary transvenous or transcutaneous pacing.
Medications
In general, optimizing maternal health will yield the best outcome for both mother and fetus; this can be achieved by considering both the efficacy and safety of medication options. Table 2 summarizes anti-arrhythmic drug use in pregnancy and lactation. Although most anti-arrhythmic drugs do not have proven safety data in pregnancy, it is important to weigh the risks and benefits of initiating antiarrhythmic therapy. In general, the presence of hemodynamically significant or sustained arrhythmias would favor initiation of anti-arrhythmic therapy to reduce maternal and fetal risk.
Table 2.
Anti-Arrhythmic Medications in Pregnancy and Lactation*
| Medication | Previous Categorization | Pregnancy | Lactation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Ia | |||
| Quinidine | C | May use while breastfeeding. Excreted in low levels in breast milk; not expected to cause infant harm based on limited excretion into milk. | |
| Procainamide | C | Caution advised while breastfeeding. Excreted in low levels in breast milk; not expected to cause infant harm based on limited excretion into milk. | |
| Disopyramide | C |
Risk of uterine contractions |
May use while breastfeeding. Monitor infant for anti-cholinergic effects; may decrease breast milk production. |
| Class Ib | |||
| Lidocaine | B | May use while breastfeeding. No known risk of infant harm based on limited human data and drug properties. May decrease milk production. | |
| Mexilitine | C | Caution advised while breastfeeding. Excreted in low levels in breast milk; not expected to cause harm in infants older than 2 months; monitor for infant toxicity. | |
| Class Ic | |||
| Flecainide | C | May use while breastfeeding. Excreted in low levels in breast milk; not expected to cause harm in infants based on limited excretion in milk. | |
| Propafenone | C | May use while breastfeeding. Excreted in low levels in breast milk; not expected to cause hard in infant harm based on limited excretion in milk. | |
| Class II | |||
| Metoprolol | C |
bradycardia, hypoglycemia |
May use while breastfeeding. No known risk of infant harm based on limited human data and limited excretion in milk. |
| Atenolol | D |
IUGR, bradycardia, hypoglycemia |
Recommend an alternative beta-blocker. Drug excreted extensively in breast milk; risk of bradycardia in the infant; infants older than 3 months appear to be at little risk of adverse effects. |
| Propranolol | C |
bradycardia, hypoglycemia |
May use while breastfeeding. No known risk of infant harm based on human studies. Low levels excreted in breastmilk. |
| Class III | |||
| Amiodarone | D |
Congenital goiter, bradycardia and QT interval prolongation risk |
May be unsafe. Excreted in breast milk in variable amounts for weeks, even after mother discontinues medication. Can reduce milk production if mother develops hypothyroidism. Infant may develop hypothyroidism and requires monitoring. No information on iodine levels excreted into breastmilk. |
| Sotalol | B |
bradycardia, hypoglycemia |
May be unsafe. Extensively excreted in breast milk and renal excretion; infants need to be monitored closely if prescribed. No reports of bradycardia in infants whose mothers were on sotalol. |
| Ibutilide | C | May use while breastfeeding. No human data available, but infant harm not expected based on drug properties. | |
| Dofetilide | C |
Risk of teratogenicity at ≥ 2 mg/kg/d based on animal studies |
Possible excretion in breast milk based on drug properties. |
| Class IV | |||
| Verapamil | C | Caution advised while breastfeeding. Excreted in breast milk in low levels; not expected to harm infants, especially if greater 2 months of age; can cause hyperprolactinemia and galactorrhea. | |
| Diltiazem | C | Caution advised while breastfeeding. <1-2% excreted in breast milk. Not expected to cause infant harm based on drug properties. | |
| Class V | |||
| Adenosine | C | May use while breastfeeding. Has a short half-life; not expected to cause infant harm based on drug properties. | |
| Digoxin | C | May use while breastfeeding. Excreted in breast milk at low levels; no known risk of infant harm based on limited human data. If given intravenously, avoid breastfeeding for 2 hours. |
Sources: LactMed online resource by the National Library of Medicine’s TOXNET and epocrates® drug database IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction
= Weigh options, risks vs. benefits
= Use alternative agent
Specific Disorders
Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)
It is unclear whether pregnancy itself increases risk for SVT, however 85% of women with prior history of SVT experience worsening of symptoms during pregnancy particularly during the third trimester (9). Presentation of SVT in pregnancy mirrors symptoms in non-pregnant women including sudden onset of palpitations, which may be associated with presyncope, syncope, dyspnea or chest pain.
Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter
Data are limited regarding the optimal management of atrial fibrillation/flutter during pregnancy which is not specifically addressed in the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines (10). Atrial fibrillation should be treated promptly as pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state, and current thromboembolic risk assessment tools have not been validated in pregnancy. Direct oral anticoagulants have unknown safety profiles during pregnancy; thus heparin or low molecular weight heparin are recommended for anticoagulation (11,12). Warfarin may be considered after the first trimester (12).
Ventricular Arrhythmias
Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are fortunately rare during pregnancy (3). However, pregnancy can exacerbate preexisting ventricular arrhythmias, with recurrent VT occurring in 27% of pregnancies in women with a prior history, particularly in those with structural heart disease (13). Reversible causes of ventricular arrhythmias should be sought and corrected, including electrolyte disturbances, ischemia, and hypoxemia(14).
Bradyarrhythmias
Acute management of bradyarrhythmias should follow standard management resuscitation protocols as performed in non-pregnant patients including considerations for transcutaneous or transvenous pacing.
Congenital Long QT Syndrome
Women with Long QT Syndrome are at increased risk of death as far as out as nine months post-delivery, particularly women with the LQT2 genotype (8,15-17). Treatment with beta-blockers is independently associated with a decrease in the risk for cardiac events (15,17). Beta-blockers should be continued during pregnancy and throughout the postpartum period, including in women who are breastfeeding (7,8).
Syncope
Women with pre-existing postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) may experience unchanged (13-20%), worsened (31-40%), or improved (40-55%) symptoms during pregnancy (18,19). Lifestyle modifications including increased salt and fluid intake, and compression stockings are recommended for the treatment and prevention of symptomatic orthostasis during pregnancy. When severe symptoms refractory to lifestyle modifications persist, medical therapy with propranolol, fludrocortisone, or midodrine may be considered, though data are limited (19). Cardiogenic syncope may occur due to structural heart disease or arrhythmia. Cardiogenic syncope warrant evaluation with electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram, and Holter/event monitoring.
Cardiomyopathies and Heart Failure
Management of heart failure during pregnancy is complex and requires interdisciplinary collaboration across various points of care (Figure 2). Cardiomyopathy associated complications in pregnancy can include heart failure, arrhythmias, or embolic events. For women with significant underlying ventricular dysfunction, symptoms of heart failure may develop as early as the second trimester as plasma volume increases (20). Management of heart failure should include continuation of beta blockade, and diuretics if indicated, and discontinuation of ACE inhibitors/ARBs and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Development of refractory acute heart failure symptoms may prompt consideration of delivery although medical stabilization of the woman is often achievable.
Figure 2. Pre-conception evaluation, counseling and management of cardiomyopathy/heart failure in pregnancy.
Appropriate evaluation and management of pregnant women with known cardiomyopathy is outlined in this figure and is crucial to ensure optimal maternal and fetal outcomes. WHO – World Health Organization. LVEF – Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. NYHA – New York Heart Association. BNP – Brain Natriuretic Peptide. NT-proBNP – N-terminal-pro hormone BNP. ACE-I – Ace-Inhibitor. ARB – Aldosterone Receptor Blocker. LV – Left Ventricle. PPCM – Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.
The postpartum period is the highest risk time for the development of clinical heart failure symptoms in women with cardiomyopathy (20,21). While lower extremity edema is common in postpartum women, the presence of jugular venous distension, orthopnea, and cough are highly suggestive of heart failure. Obtaining a brain natriuretic peptide/NT-proBNP level at baseline may be useful in monitoring women at risk for decompensated heart failure. Women with systolic dysfunction should be closely monitored for signs of volume overload during the postpartum period, with a low threshold for diuretic administration in women with evidence of intravascular hypervolemia. Standard heart failure management with diuresis, ACE inhibition and beta-blockade is recommended for postpartum women with heart failure. Data are not available regarding safety of ARB or ARNI while breastfeeding. Aldosterone antagonists such as spironolactone are contraindicated during pregnancy due to hormonal effects on the male fetus in animal models but may be used during breastfeeding. Breastfeeding should not be discouraged, nor should necessary medical therapies be withheld due to the desire to breastfeed.
Preconception counseling
Women with a history of cardiomyopathy should undergo a careful review of prior history, diagnostic testing and medication use. Evaluation should include assessment by a cardiologist with expertise in cardiovascular disease in pregnancy as well as a maternal fetal medicine specialist. Additional risk assessment is described in Figure 2.
Contraception
Discussion of contraception is critically important in all women with cardiomyopathy due to particularly high rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with cardiomyopathies in pregnancy. This is further complicated by increased risk of left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation in the postpartum period in these women. Highly effective methods of contraception are recommended. For complete discussion of contraception, refer to part 5 of this series.
Specific Disorders
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a specific type of systolic heart failure that occurs towards the end of pregnancy or in the months that follow. The diagnosis is made when the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is ≤45% in the absence of pre-existing heart disease or other identifiable causes of heart failure. PPCM should be suspected in any woman in late pregnancy or the postpartum period with new onset symptoms of heart failure (22). Management of PPCM overall is similar to the treatment of heart failure with reduced LVEF of other etiologies, with diuresis, afterload reduction, and beta-blockade (22). Though ACE inhibitors, ARBS and ARNIs should be avoided during pregnancy, several ACE inhibitors, including enalapril, captopril, and quinapril, are safe to use while breastfeeding (23). Bromocriptine has been studied to target prolactin blockade as a treatment for peripartum cardiomyopathy, however large-scale evidence-based data to support its use is lacking, with studies are ongoing.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Most women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have uncomplicated pregnancies, though there is increased risk of symptomatic heart failure and arrhythmias, particularly ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death (24-26). Pregnancy is contraindicated in the setting of severe LV dysfunction or severe symptomatic LVOT obstruction (27). Overall management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is similar to other etiologies of heart failure but notable differences, including considerations related to the potential for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Pregnancy
Medications
|
Evaluation and management
|
Delivery and postpartum
|
Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
Prevalence and Epidemiology
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the most common adverse pregnancy outcome, affecting 5-10% of women, and are associated with risk for long term CVD (28). A prior history of preeclampsia, renal disease, autoimmune disease, diabetes mellitus, and chronic hypertension are all associated with a heightened risk of preeclampsia and are indications for low dose aspirin prophylaxis as primary or secondary prevention during pregnancy (29). There are marked racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of HDP with Black and American Indian/Alaskan Native women bearing the brunt of disease and risk factor burden in the setting of historic and ongoing systemic racism. Interventions to reduce these disparities are urgently needed.
Classification of HDP
HDP include chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia. Currently cardiovascular professional societies recommend a threshold of 130/80 mm Hg for the diagnosis of hypertension, which is lower than the current ACOG guidelines for pregnant women (Figure 3) (29). There are currently evidence gaps as to how best to manage pregnant women with stage 1 hypertension (130-139 /80-89 mm Hg) prior to 20 weeks of gestation, and presently ACOG does not recommend initiation of antihypertensive medication but suggests heightened observation for the development of overt HDP.
Figure 3. Definitions of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
The spectrum of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are outlined above.
Preconception Assessment
Preconception counseling for women with chronic hypertension includes assessment for target-organ involvement and evaluation for secondary causes as clinically indicated. Modifiable CVD risk factors should be optimized before pregnancy and women should be made aware of the state of available evidence regarding various medication classes available. When possible, transitioning to preferred agents is recommended in place of an ACE-I, ARB, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Lastly, women need to be made aware of the maternal and fetal risks associated with chronic hypertension, including increased maternal risk of gestational diabetes, CVD, and delivery complications as well as fetal complications including preterm birth and restricted fetal growth.
Management
Management of hypertension during pregnancy should mirror treatment in non-pregnant patients in regards to diet and lifestyle modification. Bed rest, restriction of physical activity, weight loss, and extremely low-sodium diets (less than 100 mEq/day) should not be used for the treatment of hypertension or prevention of preeclampsia. Antihypertensives of choice in pregnancy are labetalol, nifedipine and alpha-methyldopa (Table 4). Blood pressure is expected to decline during the first and second trimesters, thus antihypertensive medications may be able to be reduced or stopped in some women with chronic hypertension in this phase. For pregnant women with severe hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg, antihypertensive therapy is recommended, however noting that overly aggressive blood pressure lowering is discouraged due to concern for impairing uteroplacental perfusion(30). Target blood pressures range from 120-160/80-110 mmHg with lower treatment thresholds in women with underlying cardiovascular conditions or end organ damage (30).
Table 4.
Preferred Agents for Antihypertensive Treatment in Pregnancy
| Starting Dose | Titration | Maximum Dosage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Line | |||
| Labetalol | 100-200 mg PO BID | Q 2-3 days | 2400 mg/24 h |
| Nifedipine ER | 30-60 mg PO Q day | Q 7-14 days | 120 mg/24 h |
| Alpha-methyldopa | 250 mg PO BID-TID | Q 2 days | 3000 mg/24 h |
| Second/Third Line | |||
| Hydralazine* | 10 mg PO QID | Q 2-5 days | 300 mg/24 h |
| Thiazide diuretics | 12.5 mg PO Q day | Q 7-14 days | 50 mg/ 24 h |
| Clonidine | 0.1- 0.3mg PO BID 0.1mg transdermal QD |
Q 7 days Q 7- 14 days |
0.6mg/24 h 0.3mg/24 h |
| CONTRAINDICATED: ACEI/ARB, Renin Inhibitors, MRAs | |||
| IV therapies for the urgent treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy | |||
| Initial Dosage | Dose Titration | ||
| Labetalol | 10-20 mg IV | 20-80mg IV Q 20-30 min to max 300mg or 1-2 mg/min IV gtt | |
| Nifedipine IR | 10-20 mg PO | Repeat x 1 in 20 minutes, then 10-20mg Q2-6h | |
| Hydralazine* | 5 mg IV or IM | 5-10 mg IV Q 20-40min or 0.5-10 mg/h IV gtt | |
do not use in isolation due to potential for reflex tachycardia
ACEI – Ace-Inhibitor, ARB – Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, MRAs – mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
Management of Acute and Severe Hypertension
Systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg for > 15 minutes is an obstetric emergency and requires urgent administration of anti-hypertensive medications to reduce the risk of maternal stroke. Intravenous labetalol and hydralazine are first-line options for therapy. Immediate release oral nifedipine may also be considered when IV access is not available (31). Clinicians can refer to the 2019 ACOG hypertension toolboxes for specific sample order sets for management of severe intrapartum or postpartum hypertension (31). Target blood pressure goal is 140-150/90-100 mmHg in a pregnant or postpartum woman with acute severe hypertension which can be modified if there are comorbid cardiovascular conditions.
Postpartum Management and Considerations for Lactation
While blood pressure normally decreases within 48 hours postpartum, blood pressure may increase again between postpartum days 3-6 due to fluid shifts, requiring close monitoring of women at risk for hypertensive complications. Preeclampsia may occur de novo postpartum, often presenting with headaches or visual changes in addition to elevated blood pressure(32). These women require prompt treatment, as they are at increased risk of stroke, seizures, pulmonary edema, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and death (32). Post-partum blood pressure evaluation is recommended within 72 hours, and no later than within 10 days after hospital discharge. Preferred agents in regards to lactation are listed in Table 5.
Table 5.
Antihypertensives & Breast Feeding
| Medication Class | Preferred Agents |
|---|---|
| Calcium Channel Blockers | Nifedipine, Verapamil, Diltiazem |
| Beta Blockers | Labetalol, Metoprolol, and Propranolol are preferred |
| ACE-I | Captopril, Enalapril, Benazepril, Quinapril |
| Diuretics | Hydrochlorothiazide, Spironolactone Safe, can decrease milk production *Exception - chlorthalidone due to risk of fetal jaundice, thrombocytopenia, hypoglycemia and electrolyte abnormalities |
| Methyldopa | Caution! May exacerbate postpartum depression |
| ARBs | Insufficient data to recommend their use during breast feeding |
| Clonidine transdermal patch | Caution! Possible infant/lactation effects |
Ischemic Heart Disease
Prevalence and Epidemiology
The prevalence of ischemic heart disease in women who become pregnant is unknown. In the most recent ROPAC study, ischemic heart disease accounted for less than 2% of maternal cardiac conditions (33). However, as maternal age has advanced over time, the likelihood of pre-existing ischemic heart disease at the time of pregnancy is expected to increase as well. Clinicians should remain suspicious of myocardial infarction (MI) in peripartum women with chest pain or acute onset shortness of breath, and in those with cardiac arrest, even in the absence of diagnostic electrocardiographic changes.
Preconception Evaluation
Women with a history of obstructive coronary disease or MI are at elevated risk of cardiac complications during pregnancy although the data are limited. The CARPREG II study noted an approximate 5-7% risk of adverse cardiac events in women with a history of IHD although other studies have estimated up to a 32% risk of cardiovascular complications (34,35). Risk discussion should include details of prior CAD/MI history including prior intervention and review of medications.
Contraception
There are few data to guide considerations for contraception in women with history of IHD. However, considering the significant concerns regarding recurrent risk of coronary dissection with pregnancy, highly effective contraception including the intrauterine device, subdermal implant and permanent sterilization should be considered, and contraceptive formulations containing estrogen should be avoided.
Pathophysiology and Prognosis
When approaching the pregnant patient with acute MI, it is essential to consider non-atherosclerotic conditions, particularly coronary dissection, emboli from hypercoagulable state and other etiologies including coronary spasm, takotsubo syndrome and potential alternative diagnoses of aortic dissection and myocarditis. Inpatient mortality rates for pregnancy-associated MI is 4.5% and similar for STEMI and NSTEMI (36). Mortality is highest among women who sustain an MI during hospitalization for labor and delivery (36-38). The decision process around selection for invasive management is discussed below noting that invasive management has been associated with lower in-hospital mortality (36).
Management
Management of pregnant women with IHD and MI is challenging, necessitating close interaction among cardiologists, obstetricians, and intensivists, Figure 4. Coronary angiography remains the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of the cause of MI. The risk of fetal compromise decreases in an inversely proportional manner to gestational age (risk being highest prior to 20 weeks) and is proportional to radiation dose (risk is lowest at < 200mGy) with no reports of fetal anomalies or loss when exposure is < 50mGy (39,40). Most coronary angiography and associated percutaneous coronary interventions can be performed well under these dose limits and radiation exposure to the fetus itself is estimated at 20% (41). Thus, if coronary angiography is clinically indicated it should be performed but with every effort to reduce radiation exposure such as reducing fluoroscopic frame rate and avoiding steep angulated views, Figure 4.
Figure 4. Considerations for evaluation and management of MI during pregnancy.
Management of MI during pregnancy requires interdisciplinary care with considerations for optimizing outcomes while also considering maternal and fetal risk as illustrated here. MI – Myocardial Infarction. ECG – Electrocardiogram. STEMI – ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. MFM – Maternal-Fetal Medicine. SCAD – Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. ALARA – As Low as Reasonable Achievable.
Medication
In women with a recent history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), details of the revascularization procedure with regard to lesion location, stent type (drug-eluting or bare-metal) and date of intervention should be documented. Low-dose aspirin is part of standard dual anti-platelet therapy after PCI and is felt to be safe during pregnancy. The risks of premature discontinuation of dual anti-platelet therapy outweigh the risks of fetal harm from continuation. Recommendations for consideration of medications in IHD are noted in Table 6.
Table 6.
Ischemic Heart Disease Medications During Pregnancy and Lactation
| Drug | Use in Pregnancy | Lactation | Adverse Effects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | First choice anti-platelet agent; also indicated for prevention of premature birth and pre-eclampsia. | Low dose aspirin may be used for cardiovascular indications. Appears in subclinical amounts in human milk. |
Safe when dose is below 100 mg. Full dose aspirin: in first trimester may cause 2-3-fold increase risk of gastroschisis; with high dose also risk for premature closure of ductus arteriosus, fetal bleeding risk. |
| Clopidogrel | May be used for shortest duration necessary. Animal studies do not note adverse effects; limited human data. Must be stopped 7 days prior to regional anesthesia. | Assess risk/benefit. Low risk of infant harm based on limited human data and drug properties. | Not expected to cause congenital anomalies based on animal studies. |
|
Prasugrel Ticagrelor/Cangrelor |
Minimal data; Ticagrelor does cross placenta. Assess risk/benefit. Must be stopped 5-7 days prior to regional anesthesia. | Assess risk/benefit. No human data available, though drug excretion into milk possible based on drug properties. | No reported complications with prasugrel. |
| Ranolazine | Unknown | Unknown | Maternal toxicity and misshapen sternebrae and reduced ossification in animal studies; no adequate well-controlled studies in pregnant women; current recommendation is used during pregnancy only when potential benefit to patient justify potential risk to fetus |
| Tirofiban/eptifibatide | Unknown | Unknown | No current guidelines; not well studied; there is case report stating that it could be safe but not many studies. Eptifibatide’s short half-life may allow safe use proximal to delivery. |
|
Beta Blockers Labetalol Atenolol Metoprolol Caivedilol |
Metoprolol succinate preferred (avoids interfering with B2-mediated uterine relaxation and peripheral vasodilation). Atenolol contraindicated |
Assess risk/benefit. Labetalol and metoprolol are safe; carvedilol is unknown risk. Avoid atenolol if possible. Transfer to breast milk in low levels. |
Atenolol associated with birth defects/IUGR |
|
Calcium Channel Blockers Nifedipine Verapamil Diltiazem Amlodipine |
Nifedipine is first line for hypertension and tocolysis (when used with magnesium) Verapamil considered fairly safe (second line after beta blockers for rate control and treatment of idiopathic sustained ventricular tachycardia). Amlodipine is probably safe for hypertension |
Nifedipine is safe Assess risk/benefit of verapamil and diltiazem. Excreted in milk in low levels, not expected to cause infant harm based on drug properties. |
Possible prematurity, IUGR, fetal bradycardia in some CCB Risk of teratogenicity not expected based on limited human data. Has tocolytic effect (delay contraction and suppress labor); can cause maternal hypotension and placental hypoperfusion. |
| Nitrates | Safe in pregnancy | Weight risks/benefits. Limited data. | Crosses placenta; potential hypotension |
| Statins | Contraindicated | Contraindicated | Potential teratogenicity; limited human data. Use in first trimester correlated with premature birth. |
| Bile Acid Sequestrants (cholestyramine and colestipol) | Considered safer than other lipid-lowering agents; treatment of choice for hyperlipidemia | Considered safe. Limited data. | May lower fat-soluble vitamins |
|
ACE inhibitors Angiotensin Receptor Blockers |
Contraindicated | Captopril, benazepril and enalapril, quinapril are considered safe. Because of low levels excreted into breastmilk, infant harm is not expected. Conflicting data for ARBS; currently contraindicated |
Fetal renal and cardiac abnormalities |
Delivery
As in non-pregnant patients, patients with IHD may be sensitive to excessive derangements in hemodynamics. However, conditions that limit coronary perfusion or increase myocardial oxygen demand during delivery could be particularly harmful in pregnant women who require an increase in blood volume to accommodate the growing fetus (Table 7). Anti-platelet therapy such as clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor should be held for 5 to 7 days prior to delivery.
Table 7.
Delivery management in pregnant women with IHD
| Such conditions as iron deficiency anemia and volume depletion may exacerbate underlying ischemia. |
| Hypotension should be avoided to limit demand ischemia as well as placental hypoperfusion. |
| Hypertensive episodes, particularly in the setting of gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia, should be aggressively treated in pregnant women with IHD to avoid exacerbation of ischemia and increase in afterload. |
| In regard to mode of delivery, in general, there are no data to suggest that cesarean section is associated with improved outcomes over vaginal delivery in women with IHD. |
| Overall, vaginal delivery is encouraged whenever possible to avoid infectious risk and excess bleeding with consideration for assisted second stage and efforts to minimize blood loss and reduce tachycardia. |
| IHD – Ischemic Heart Disease |
Specific Disorders
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
The treatment of ACS during pregnancy is similar to standard guidelines, with additional considerations for fetal and maternal safety required. Collaboration between obstetric and cardiology services is essential, and management in an intensive care unit should be considered. Urgent delivery of a viable fetus may be required in the event of maternal deterioration.
Medication.
Standard medical therapy for ACS/AMI may need modification in the peripartum period. Morphine does not have teratogenic effects but can cause neonatal respiratory depression if given close to delivery. Heparin does not cross the placenta and is considered safe during pregnancy, but has to be discontinued before delivery. P2Y12 inhibitors have to be held seven days prior to regional anesthesia to reduce the risk of epidural hematoma, though low-dose aspirin does not (42). Nitrates are considered acceptable for use, with close monitoring to avoid hypotension.
Medical Management and PCI.
As with non-pregnant patients, pregnant women presenting with STEMI or unstable NSTEMI should be offered primary PCI (43). Low risk pregnant women with NSTEMI who are hemodynamically stable, without ongoing ischemia, and with normal left ventricular function may be considered for medical management. Women with STEMI and high risk or unstable NSTEMI should undergo invasive strategy regardless of pregnancy status.
Thrombolysis.
Thrombolytic therapy is relatively contraindicated during pregnancy and should only be used in emergency situations when primary PCI is not available as use may worsen coronary artery dissections, which accounts for a significant portion of peripartum ACS.
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD)
SCAD commonly results from intramural hemorrhage and more than two-thirds of cases during pregnancy occur postpartum although SCAD may occur at any stage of pregnancy. Women with pregnancy associated SCAD (P-SCAD) often have more severe presentations including hemodynamic instability and multivessel dissections (44). In regard to risk factors, women with P-SCAD are more likely to have history of fertility therapy, multiparity and preeclampsia.
Preconception counseling in women with history of SCAD
The data on safety of pregnancy in women with prior history of SCAD are limited. The recurrence rate was approximately 15%, in the largest series to date, but this only included 32 pregnancies after a SCAD event (45). Considering the unpredictable nature of SCAD, recommendations regarding risk stratification in pregnancy are unclear. If a woman with a history of SCAD desires pregnancy, LV function, medications and detailed history of SCAD should be reviewed by a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics team.
Coronary Angiography and Management of SCAD
Management of P-SCAD is similar to SCAD in non-pregnant patients however outcomes in pregnancy are worse thus necessitating particular care in evaluation and management, Figure 5. Conservative therapy is preferred in most stable P-SCAD patients, as PCI has often been associated with propagation of dissections. Mechanical support with intra-aortic balloon pump can be considered in hemodynamically unstable women. Intravenous heparin is routinely administered in acute coronary syndrome patients but should be discontinued once P-SCAD is identified.
Figure 5. Presentation and Management of SCAD in Pregnancy.
Recognition and management of suspected SCAD in pregnancy requires clinical suspicion and careful assessment during coronary angiography. Considerations for treatment and invasive management are summarized here. SCAD – Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. P-SCAD – Pregnancy-Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. PCI – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. CABG – Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Conclusion
Women with pre-existing acquired cardiovascular disease require thorough evaluation and risk stratification prior to conception. During pregnancy, careful attention should be paid to preservation of maternal stability as this is paramount to optimizing fetal health. Considering the complexity of such cardiovascular conditions, multidisciplinary care is critical involving such subspecialties within cardiology such as heart failure, interventional and electrophysiology.
Highlights.
Acquired forms of cardiovascular disease account for considerable morbidity and mortality among pregnant women.
Interdisciplinary, team-based care is critical to managing complex acquired cardiovascular disease in pregnant women.
Optimizing maternal outcomes in pregnant women with cardiovascular disease is crucial to promoting fetal health.
Acknowledgments
Funding:
Bello- NIH/NHLBI (K23 HL136853-03, R01 HL153382-01)
Shah- NIH/NHLBI (5K08HL136850, Women As One)
Minissian- F31NR015725. CTSI support UL1TR000124 and UL1TR001881-01, and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association through the American Nurses Foundation (#5362). Additional support was provided by the Cedars-Sinai Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geri and Richard Brawerman Nursing Institute, Simms/ Mann Family Foundation, Department of Nursing Research, Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center. Beta Chi Chapter. Cedars-Sinai Precision Health Institute (#42254).
Volgman – NIH/ National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) - R01 NR018443; Novartis TQJ230A12001, epidemiological study on lipoprotein a in patients with CVD Bairey Merz - This work was supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes [grant numbers N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HV-68163, N01-HV-68164, U0164829, U01 HL649141, U01 HL649241, K23HL105787, K23HL125941, T32HL69751, R01 HL090957]; the National Institute on Aging [grant number 1R03AG032631]; National Center for Research Resources General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) [grant number MO1-RR00425]; the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [grant number UL1TR000124 and UL1TR000064]; grants from the Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Danville, NJ, The Women’s Guild of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, The Ladies Hospital Aid Society of Western Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA, and QMED, Inc., Laurence Harbor, NJ, the Edythe L. Broad and the Constance Austin Women’s Heart Research Fellowships, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, the Barbra Streisand Women’s Cardiovascular Research and Education Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, The Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR), Washington, D.C., The Linda Joy Pollin Women’s Heart Health Program, the Erika J. Glazer Women’s Heart Research Initiative, and the Adelson Family Foundation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Reynolds – in-kind donations for unrelated studies from Abbott Vascular, Siemens, BioTelemetry
Wei- none
Abbreviations
- VT
Ventricular Tachycardia
- SVT
Supra-Ventricular Tachycardia
- PCI
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- MI
Myocardial Infarction
- ACS
Acute Coronary Syndrome
- PPCM
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
- LVEF
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
- SCAD
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection
- NYHA
New York Heart Association
- MFM
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures:
Bello- none
Lindley – none
Park – Abbott
Shah- none
Elgendy- none
Duvernoy – none
Wenger - none
Minissian- 2018-2020 Amgen, Consultant, Medical Advisory Board; honorarium NACCME, LLC Co-Chair for CME; 2018-2019 Vox Media; 5/2019 Medtelligence; Minneapolis Heart Institute; Primed; Good Samaritan Hospital Los Angeles, CA; Cardiometabolic Health Congress; American Heart Association; National Lipid Association; Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association; American College of Cardiology.
Volgman – Apple Inc. (stock ownership)
Bairey Merz – research grants Sanofi, Abbott, consulting Bayer, board service rRhythm
Hameed – none
Wei- none
Reynolds – In-kind donations for unrelated studies from Abbott Vascular, Siemens, BioTelemetry
Davis – none
Ferdinand – none
Itchhaporia – None
Mehta – none
Pepine – none
Russo - none
References
- 1.Goyal N, Herrick JS, Son S, Metz TD, Shah RU. Maternal cardiovascular complications at the time of delivery and subsequent re-hospitalization in the United States, 2010 to 2016. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2019. October 14;qcz056. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vaidya VR, Arora S, Patel N et al. Burden of arrhythmia in pregnancy. Circulation 2017;135:619–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li JM, Nguyen C, Joglar JA, Hamdan MH, Page RL. Frequency and outcome of arrhythmias complicating admission during pregnancy: experience from a high-volume and ethnically-diverse obstetric service. Clin Cardiol 2008;31:538–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on PracticeBulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 211: Critical care in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e303–e319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. April 5;67(13):e27–e115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Natale A, Davidson T, Geiger MJ, Newby K. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and pregnancy: a safe combination? Circulation 1997;96:2808–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J 2015;36:2793–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:e91–e220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee KT, Chang SH, Kuo CF, Chiou MJ, Wen MS. Incidence and time course of symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia during pregnancy: a nation-wide database study. Acta Cardiol Sin 2020;36:44–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:e1–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Katsi V, Georgiopoulos G, Marketou M et al. Atrial fibrillation in pregnancy: a growing challenge. Curr Med Res Opin 2017;33:1497–1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM et al. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation (compilation of 2006 ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1935–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Silversides CK, Harris L, Haberer K, Sermer M, Colman JM, Siu SC. Recurrence rates of arrhythmias during pregnancy in women with previous tachyarrhythmia and impact on fetal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1206–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jeejeebhoy FM, Zelop CM, Lipman S et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;132:1747–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rashba EJ, Zareba W, Moss AJ et al. Influence of pregnancy on the risk for cardiac events in patients with hereditary long QT syndrome. LQTS Investigators. Circulation 1998;97:451–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Khositseth A, Tester DJ, Will ML, Bell CM, Ackerman MJ. Identification of a common genetic substrate underlying postpartum cardiac events in congenital long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2004;1:60–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Seth R, Moss AJ, McNitt S et al. Long QT syndrome and pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1092–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blitshteyn S, Poya H, Bett GC. Pregnancy in postural tachycardia syndrome: clinical course and maternal and fetal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:1631–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kanjwal K, Karabin B, Kanjwal Y, Grubb BP. Outcomes of pregnancy in patients with preexisting postural tachycardia syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:1000–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ruys TP, Roos-Hesselink JW, Hall R et al. Heart failure in pregnant women with cardiac disease: data from the ROPAC. Heart 2014;100:231–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sliwa K, Petrie M, van der Meer P et al. Clinical presentation, management, and 6-month outcomes in women with peripartuym cardiomyopathy: an ESC EORP registry. Eur Heart J 2020;41:3787–3797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Davis MB, Arany Z, McNamara D et al. Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75(2): 207–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed) [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2006-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501922/. Accessed on October 5, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation 2001;104:515–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goland S, van Hagen IM, Elbaz-Greener G et al. Pregnancy in women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: data from the European Society of Cardiology initiated Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC). Eur Heart J 2017;38:2683–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Autore C, Conte MR, Piccininno M et al. Risk associated with pregnancy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1864–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2733–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garovic VD, White WM, Vaughan L et al. Incidence and long-term outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2323–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e1–e25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 203: Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e26–e50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.ACOG Committee Opinion No. 767: Emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e174–e180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sibai BM. Etiology and management of postpartum hypertension-preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:470–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roos-Hesselink J, Baris L, Johnson M et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with cardiovascular disease: evolving trends over 10 years in the ESC Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC). Eur Heart J 2019;40:3848–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Silversides CK, Grewal J, Mason J et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease: the CARPREG II Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:2419–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lameijer H, Burchill LJ, Baris L et al. Pregnancy in women with pre-existent ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review with individualised patient data. Heart 2019;105:873–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Guo Y, et al. Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy and the puerperium in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:1404–14; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roth A, Elkayam U. Acute myocardial infarction associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:171–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ladner HE, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:480–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Toppenberg KS, Hill DA, Miller DP. Safety of radiographic imaging during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 1999;59:1813–8, 1820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jain C ACOG Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3165–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Horlocker TT, Vandermeuelen E, Kopp SL, Gogarten W, Leffert LR, Benzon HT. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:263–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tweet MS, Lewey J, Smilowitz NR, Rose CH, Best PJM. Pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction: prevalence, causes, and interventional management. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020:CIRCINTERVENTIONS120008687. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.008687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hayes SN, Tweet MS, Adlam D et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:961–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tweet MS, Young KA, Best PJM et al. Association of pregnancy with recurrence of spontaneous coronary artery dissection among women with prior coronary artery dissection. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2018170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






