Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 23.
Published before final editing as: Occup Environ Med. 2020 Oct 23:oemed-2020-106818. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106818

Occupational pesticide use and self-reported olfactory impairment in United States farmers

Srishti Shrestha 1, David M Umbach 2, Laura E Beane Freeman 3, Stella Koutros 3, Michael Alavanja 4, Aaron Blair 3, Honglei Chen 5,*, Dale P Sandler 1,*
PMCID: PMC8062570  NIHMSID: NIHMS1656606  PMID: 33097675

Abstract

Objectives:

Pesticide exposure may impair human olfaction, but empirical evidence is limited. We examined associations between occupational use of 50 specific pesticides and olfactory impairment, both self-reported, among 20,409 participants in the Agricultural Health Study, a prospective cohort of pesticide applicators (mostly farmers, 97% male).

Methods:

We used logistic regression models to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between pesticide use at enrollment (1993-1997) and olfactory impairment reported two decades later (2013-2016), adjusting for baseline covariates.

Results:

About 10% of participants reported olfactory impairment. The overall cumulative days of any pesticide use at enrollment was associated with a higher odds of reporting olfactory impairment [OR (highest vs. lowest quartile): 1.17 (95% CI: 1.02-1.34), p-trend=0.003]. In the analyses of 50 specific pesticides, ever-use of 20 pesticides showed modest associations with olfactory impairment, with ORs ranging from 1.11 to 1.33. Of these, higher lifetime days of use of 12 pesticides were associated with higher odds of olfactory impairment as compared to never use (p-trend ≤0.05), including two organochlorine insecticides (DDT and lindane), two organophosphate insecticides (diazinon and malathion), permethrin, the fungicide captan, and six herbicides (glyphosate, petroleum distillates, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and metribuzin), although many of these did not exhibit clear, monotonic exposure-response patterns.

Conclusions:

Overall, we found relatively broad associations between pesticides and olfactory impairment, involving many individual pesticides and covering several chemical classes, suggesting that pesticides could affect olfaction through multiple pathways. Future epidemiological studies with objective measurement of olfaction are required to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Pesticides, Olfaction, Farmers, Agricultural Health Study

INTRODUCTION

Olfactory impairment is common among older adults, affecting about 25% of those 50 years or older and over 60% of those older than 80 years.[1,2] Olfactory deficit may negatively impact human functioning such as safety, diet and nutrition, and overall quality of life,[3] and has been associated with increased mortality in older adults.[4,5] Olfactory impairment is likely an early manifestation of neurodegenerative conditions including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases[6,7] and thus may be critical to understanding the process of early neurodegeneration. Although research on modifiable risk factors for olfactory impairment among older adults could have major public health significance, empirical data are limited.

Exposure to pesticides can occur through occupational or residential use, or indirectly from air drifts, food, and water or soil contamination. Although poorly studied, pesticide exposures may jeopardize human sense of smell through several mechanisms.[8] Direct contact with inhaled pesticides may damage peripheral olfactory epithelium through acute or chronic inflammation. Further, inhaled or ingested pesticides may exert neurotoxic effects on the central nervous system including central olfactory pathways through several mechanisms, leading to olfactory deficit.[8-10] Prior evidence linking certain pesticides or their functional classes (for example, organochlorine insecticides dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dieldrin, organophosphate insecticides, and herbicide paraquat) with neurocognitive dysfunction and Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases provides indirect support for the pesticide-olfactory impairment hypothesis.[11-14] Several toxicological studies have also shown olfactory impairment in animals exposed to certain pesticides (including organophosphate insecticide malathion and herbicide paraquat).[15-17] An investigation in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) reported the first evidence that unusually high pesticide exposure events are associated with higher odds of reporting a poor sense of smell.[18] Here we evaluated possible associations between chronic occupational exposures to specific pesticides and self-reported olfactory impairment in the same population.

METHODS

Study population

In 1993-1997, 52,394 private pesticide applicators (97.4% male, mainly farmers) enrolled in the AHS by completing an enrollment questionnaire at local pesticide licensing locations [19]. Participants were also asked to complete an additional take-home questionnaire, which was returned by 44% (n=22,916) of the enrollees. Those who returned the take-home questionnaire were largely similar,[20] but more likely to be older, from Iowa, and former or never smokers than those who did not (Supplementary Table 1). Participants were also asked to report pesticide application practices, other farm exposures, socio-demographics, lifestyle, and medical history. Follow-up interviews were conducted in 1999-2003, 2005-2010, and 2013-2016 to update information on farm exposures and medical history. Participants were asked about olfactory impairment at the third follow-up in 2013-2016, which was completed by 24,145 applicators. All study questionnaires can be found at https://aghealth.nih.gov/collaboration/questionnaires.html. All applicable institutional review boards approved the study.

Self-reported pesticide use

Pesticide exposure at enrollment

The enrollment questionnaire asked about general pesticide use including days and years participants personally mixed or applied pesticides. The questionnaire also sought information on ever-use of 50 specific pesticides and duration and frequency of use for 22 of them. The take-home questionnaire further asked participants to provide duration and frequency of use for the remaining 28 pesticides. These questionnaires also asked for detailed information on pesticide use practices including application methods, mixing processes, personal protective equipment use, and other workplace hygiene factors.

Our primary analyses focused on pesticides reported at enrollment, and we used two exposure metrics: ever-use and exposure-intensity weighted life-time days of use (IWLD) as measures of cumulative exposure to pesticides. The IWLD was estimated as the product of years of use and days used per year weighted by exposure intensity and then grouped into four categories: never use (referent category) and tertiles of days use among users. Exposure intensity was derived using an algorithm that incorporated information on mixing practices, application methods, repair of pesticide application equipment, and personal protective equipment use. Details on its development are described elsewhere.[21]

Pesticide exposure at the first follow up

We also considered cumulative pesticide use (i.e., IWLD) through the first follow-up in our secondary analyses. At the first follow-up, applicators were asked to provide the names and number of days of use for each pesticide that they used in the year before the interview or, for pesticides that they no longer used, in the most recent year of use. Participants also provided information on pesticide application practices. To estimate cumulative exposure through the first follow-up, we assumed that pesticide usage reported in the most recent year represented pesticide use during the period since enrollment.

Self-reported olfactory impairment

In the third follow-up (2013-2016), participants were asked “do you suffer from a loss of sense of smell or significantly decreased sense of smell?” Positive response to the question was considered ‘olfactory impairment’. Participants were also asked “when did you start losing your sense of smell?” with four response choices: ≤ 1, 1-5, 5-10, and > 10 years prior to the third follow-up.

Statistical analysis

Of the 24,145 who completed the third follow up questionnaire, we excluded 2,549 participants with proxy-provided responses, 402 missing information on olfaction, and 785 with missing data on baseline covariates that were selected for confounding adjustment. For ever-use analyses and for the IWLD analyses for the 22 pesticides for which frequency and duration of use were asked in the enrollment questionnaire, our overall analytical sample included 20,409 applicators. In the IWLD analyses for the 28 pesticides for which frequency and duration of use were asked only in the take-home questionnaire, our overall analytic sample size was 11,847. Sample sizes for individual pesticide analyses differed due to missing data on specific pesticides.

We used logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between pesticide use at enrollment and olfactory impairment reported about 19 years later (on average, range: 16 to 22 years) in the third follow-up, adjusting for baseline age (continuous linear function), sex, state of residence, education, smoking status, and other farming tasks (including repairing engines, replacing asbestos brake linings, handling stored grain, working in swine confinement areas, welding, and painting). These common farming activities may result in exposures to airborne irritants (e.g., dusts, fumes, solvents, and metals) which may in turn damage olfaction.[8] For age at enrollment, we further explored other functional forms including quadratic terms, restricted quadratic splines, and age categories and got similar results. We therefore adjusted age as a continuous linear variable throughout the analyses. We also adjusted for ever-use of specific pesticides that were correlated with the pesticide of interest (with Spearman correlation coefficient ≥ 0.40). In the IWLD analyses, we estimated P for trend using the median value for each exposure category as a continuous variable in regression models. For all the analyses, exposures were modeled as a fixed variable (not time varying) in relation to the outcome.

To examine the robustness of our results, we conducted six sensitivity analyses. First, we conducted analyses using two other exposure metrics – lifetime days of use (not weighted by exposure intensity) and average days per year of use. Second, we performed analysis excluding individuals who reported a history of head injury or were missing data on head injury among those who returned the take-home questionnaire (n=10,162). Third, we excluded participants who self-reported Parkinson’s disease in any AHS surveys because olfactory impairment is one of the most common prodromal symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (n=20,184) [6,22]. Fourth, we restricted to participants who reported olfactory impairment with onset reported ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up to reduce the possibility of reverse causality (n=19,563). Fifth, we examined associations between IWLD of pesticides through the first follow-up and olfactory impairment with onset reported ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up to account for more proximal exposures (n=19,563); for this analysis as well, IWLD was modelled as a fixed variable (not time varying). Because some participants did not participate in the first follow-up survey, in this analysis, we used multiple imputation to estimate cumulative exposure for those who did not complete the first follow-up (16%). Details on imputation are described elsewhere.[23] Lastly, as only about 40% of the enrollees completed the third follow-up survey, we applied inverse probability of censoring weights to see if selective attrition of the cohort over time biased our results.[24] We performed statistical analyses using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Statistical significance was determined using two-sided tests with α of 0.05.

RESULTS

The average age at enrollment was 46 years (standard deviation: 11 years; range: 15-87); 97% were male and 98% white. About 10% reported olfactory impairment (n=2,069) about two decades later at the third follow-up. Of these, 1,223 reported the loss ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up, 617 reported loss > 10 years before, and 229 did not respond to the question on time of onset. Older participants, those from Iowa, current smokers, and those involved in activities including repairing engines, replacing asbestos brake linings, and welding more likely to report olfactory impairment (Table 1). Further, participants with head injury at baseline and those who reported having Parkinson’s disease in any AHS survey were more likely to report olfactory impairment.

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants at enrollment in the Agricultural Health Study (n=20,409), Iowa and North Carolina

Characteristics No OI, n (%)
(n=18340)
OI, n (%)
(n=2069)
Age (years)a
  ≤45 9220 (50.3) 812 (39.2)
  >45-55 5098 (27.8) 584 (28.2)
  >55-65 3332 (18.2) 520 (25.1)
  >65 690 (3.8) 153 (7.4)
Sex
  Female 528 (2.9) 48 (2.3)
  Male 17812 (97.1) 2021 (97.7)
Raceb
  Other 291 (1.6) 25 (1.2)
  White 18033 (98.4) 2042 (98.8)
Statea
  Iowa 12765 (69.6) 1500 (72.5)
  North Carolina 5575 (30.4) 569 (27.5)
Marital statusa,c
  Never married 1636 (8.9) 129 (6.2)
  Married/Living as married 15911 (86.9) 1845 (89.3)
  Divorced/Widowed 773 (4.2) 93 (4.5)
Education
  ≤ High school 9591 (52.3) 1057 (51.1)
  1-3 year beyond high school 4820 (26.3) 584 (28.2)
  ≥ College graduate 3929 (21.4) 428 (20.7)
Smoking statusa
  Never 10496 (57.2) 1037 (50.1)
  Former 5666 (30.9) 726 (35.1)
  Current 2178 (11.9) 306 (14.8)
Chewing tobacco use
  No 15825 (86.3) 1790 (86.5)
  Yes 2515 (13.7) 279 (13.5)
Snuff use
  No 17534 (95.6) 1977 (95.6)
  Yes 806 (4.4) 92 (4.4)
Alcohol intake (past 12 months)d
  No 5720 (32.1) 619 (30.9)
  Yes 12081 (67.9) 1386 (69.1)
Ever diagnosed with head injurya,e,f
  No 9114 (87.3) 1048 (83.6)
  Yes 1325 (12.7) 205 (16.4)
Repair enginesa
  No 10264 (56) 1103 (53.3)
  Yes 8076 (44) 966 (46.7)
Replace asbestos brake liningsa
  No 15402 (84) 1676 (81)
  Yes 2938 (16) 393 (19)
Handle stored grain
  No 4823 (26.3) 524 (25.3)
  Yes 13517 (73.7) 1545 (74.7)
Work in swine confinement areas
  No 12736 (69.4) 1431 (69.2)
  Yes 5604 (30.6) 638 (30.8)
Weld
  No 5144 (28) 539 (26.1)
  Yes 13196 (72) 1530 (73.9)
Paint
  No 5144 (28) 569 (27.5)
  Yes 13196 (72) 1500 (72.5)
Parkinson’s diseasea,g,h
  No 18237 (99.6) 1947 (94.8)
  Yes 70 (0.4) 106 (5.2)

Abbreviations: OI, Olfactory impairment

a

p-value from Chi-square tests ≤ 0.05

b

Race missing: n=18

c

Marital status missing n=22

d

Alcohol intake missing: n=603

e

Head injury missing: n=8717

f

Information on these variables was asked only in the take-home survey (completed by 44% of the enrollees)

g

Parkinson’s disease missing n=49

h

All characteristics except for Parkinson’s disease were asked at enrollment; self-reported Parkinson’s disease at enrollment or at any follow-up to the third.

In the analysis of lifetime days of use of any pesticides, compared with the lowest usage quartile, the OR for the highest quartile was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.34, P for trend=0.003, Table 2). In the ever-use analyses, 20 of the 50 specific pesticides examined were significantly associated with olfactory impairment, including four organochlorines (dieldrin, DDT, toxaphene, and lindane), two carbamates (carbaryl and carbofuran), four organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, dichlorvos, malathion, and parathion), permethrin (both on animal and crop use), the fumigant carbon tetrachloride/carbon disulfide 80/20 mix, two fungicides (captan and metalaxyl), and six herbicides (dicamba, glyphosate, paraquat, petroleum distillates, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)); ORs were mostly modest, ranging from 1.11 to 1.33 (Table 2). Although not statistically significant, several other pesticides had ORs of similar or higher magnitude (for example, coumaphos and chlorothalonil, Table 2). The results were generally similar when we excluded those with head injury among those who returned take-home questionnaire (Supplementary Table 2) or excluded self-reported Parkinson’s disease (Supplementary Table 3). When we restricted analyses to participants who reported olfactory impairment with onset ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up, results were generally similar, although associations for a few pesticides were no longer significant (for example, toxaphene and lindane); results for other pesticides became stronger (for example, DDT and fumigant carbon tetrachloride/carbon disulfide 80/20 mix) (Table 2).

Table 2.

General pesticide use and ever-use of pesticide at enrollment in relation to self-reported olfactory impairment reported in the third follow-up in the Agricultural Health Study (n=20,409), Iowa and North Carolina

Any OIa (n=20,409) Time-Restricted OIb (n=19,563)
Pesticides No OI n (%)
(n=18340)
OI n (%)
(n=2069)
OR (95% CI) OI n (%)
(n=1223)
OR (95% CI)
Overall pesticide
lifetime days
 0-64 4867 (26.5) 499 (24.1) Ref 302 (24.7) Ref
 >64-225 6042 (32.9) 607 (29.4) 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) 353 (28.9) 0.92 (0.79, 1.09)
 >225-458 3959 (21.6) 461 (22.3) 1.04 (0.91, 1.19) 253 (20.7) 0.96 (0.80, 1.14)
 >458 3469 (18.9) 501 (24.2) 1.17 (1.02, 1.34) 314 (25.7) 1.18 (1.00, 1.40)
Insecticide 17260 (94.1) 1989 (96.2) 1.37 (1.08, 1.74) 1172 (95.9) 1.31 (0.97, 1.76)
 Organochlorine 9720 (54.5) 1330 (65.7) 1.26 (1.13, 1.41) 788 (66.2) 1.20 (1.05, 1.38)
  Aldrin 3251 (19.4) 517 (27.6) 1.04 (0.90, 1.20) 314 (28.6) 1.06 (0.88, 1.27)
  Chlordane 4492 (26.4) 657 (34.1) 1.10 (0.98, 1.24) 398 (35.0) 1.07 (0.93, 1.24)
  Dieldrin 1161 (6.9) 217 (11.5) 1.19 (1.00, 1.43) 123 (11.2) 1.06 (0.85, 1.34)
  DDT 3951 (23.4) 666 (34.8) 1.27 (1.11, 1.44) 425 (37.7) 1.33 (1.13, 1.56)
  Heptachlor 2817 (16.8) 454 (24.1) 1.09 (0.94, 1.26) 278 (25.2) 1.16 (0.96, 1.40)
  Toxaphene 2412 (14.2) 367 (19.2) 1.20 (1.06, 1.37) 213 (18.9) 1.12 (0.95, 1.32)
  Lindane 3663 (21.5) 521 (26.9) 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) 289 (25.3) 1.10 (0.95, 1.27)
 Carbamate 12244 (68.0) 1537 (75.4) 1.38 (1.23, 1.54) 923 (76.7) 1.41 (1.22, 1.63)
  Aldicarb 1694 (10.1) 171 (9.0) 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) 115 (10.3) 1.05 (0.83, 1.32)
  Carbaryl 9611 (56.5) 1204 (62.5) 1.21 (1.09, 1.36) 717 (63.6) 1.21 (1.05, 1.40)
  Carbofuran 4976 (29.1) 672 (34.5) 1.16 (1.04, 1.28) 397 (34.5) 1.13 (1.00, 1.29)
 Organophosphate 16507 (90.0) 1934 (93.6) 1.45 (1.20, 1.75) 1135 (93.0) 1.37 (1.08, 1.73)
  Chlorpyrifos 7884 (43.3) 963 (46.8) 1.15 (1.04, 1.26) 568 (46.7) 1.15 (1.02, 1.30)
  Coumaphos 1634 (9.7) 222 (11.6) 1.15 (0.99, 1.34) 125 (11.0) 1.09 (0.89, 1.32)
  Diazinon 5648 (33.2) 720 (37.4) 1.07 (0.96, 1.19) 428 (37.9) 1.05 (0.92, 1.21)
  Dichlorvos 2123 (12.4) 309 (15.9) 1.22 (1.07, 1.40) 175 (15.2) 1.20 (1.01, 1.42)
  Fonofos 4057 (23.6) 497 (25.4) 0.99 (0.89, 1.11) 286 (24.7) 0.99 (0.86, 1.15)
  Malathion 12742 (72.8) 1579 (79.1) 1.29 (1.15, 1.45) 928 (78.7) 1.26 (1.09, 1.47)
  Parathion 2554 (15.1) 363 (18.9) 1.21 (1.07, 1.38) 221 (19.6) 1.19 (1.01, 1.40)
  Phorate 6001 (35.2) 741 (38.4) 1.01 (0.91, 1.12) 433 (38.1) 1.01 (0.89, 1.16)
  Terbufos 7105 (41.2) 864 (44.0) 1.07 (0.97, 1.18) 503 (43.5) 1.09 (0.96, 1.23)
  Trichlorfon 104 (0.6) 16 (0.8) 1.31 (0.77, 2.24) 8 (0.7) 1.03 (0.50, 2.13)
 Permethrin (crops) 2327 (13.7) 303 (15.7) 1.23 (1.07, 1.40) 177 (15.5) 1.23 (1.04, 1.45)
 Permethrin (animals) 2638 (15.3) 342 (17.5) 1.21 (1.06, 1.38) 202 (17.5) 1.30 (1.10, 1.53)
Fumigant 4197 (22.9) 531 (25.7) 1.15 (1.02, 1.29) 336 (27.5) 1.18 (1.03, 1.37)
 CCl4/CS2 955 (5.6) 171 (8.9) 1.28 (1.07, 1.53) 111 (9.8) 1.40 (1.13, 1.73)
 Aluminum phosphide 913 (5.4) 112 (5.8) 1.06 (0.86, 1.30) 71 (6.3) 1.16 (0.90, 1.49)
 Ethylene dibromide 619 (3.6) 66 (3.4) 0.86 (0.66, 1.12) 43 (3.8) 0.91 (0.66, 1.26)
 Methyl bromide 2395 (14.0) 258 (13.4) 0.98 (0.82, 1.17) 162 (14.3) 0.94 (0.75, 1.17)
Fungicide 6529 (35.6) 767 (37.1) 1.14 (1.03, 1.27) 469 (38.4) 1.15 (1.00, 1.31)
 Benomyl 1513 (9.1) 176 (9.4) 1.00 (0.80, 1.24) 107 (9.7) 0.93 (0.71, 1.22)
 Captan 2087 (12.3) 288 (14.9) 1.21 (1.06, 1.39) 170 (14.8) 1.22 (1.03, 1.45)
 Chlorothalonil 1153 (6.8) 142 (7.4) 1.23 (0.99, 1.52) 91 (8.0) 1.27 (0.98, 1.66)
 Maneb 1523 (8.9) 187 (9.7) 1.12 (0.91, 1.37) 117 (10.3) 1.12 (0.87, 1.43)
 Metalaxyl 3749 (21.9) 434 (22.5) 1.15 (1.00, 1.31) 268 (23.7) 1.16 (0.98, 1.38)
 Ziram 253 (1.5) 28 (1.5) 0.98 (0.66, 1.46) 20 (1.8) 1.18 (0.74, 1.87)
Herbicide 17913 (97.7) 2035 (98.4) 1.23 (0.85, 1.78) 1199 (98.1) 1.09 (0.70, 1.68)
 Alachlor 9641 (55.8) 1161 (59.4) 1.06 (0.96, 1.17) 680 (58.7) 1.04 (0.92, 1.18)
 Butylate 5776 (34.1) 720 (37.6) 1.03 (0.92, 1.15) 416 (36.9) 1.00 (0.87, 1.16)
 Chlorimuron ethyl 6482 (37.9) 734 (38.1) 1.00 (0.91, 1.11) 436 (38.4) 1.04 (0.92, 1.18)
 Dicamba 9506 (55.2) 1158 (59.3) 1.11 (1.00, 1.24) 658 (57.1) 1.08 (0.94, 1.25)
 EPTC 3658 (21.5) 448 (23.1) 1.04 (0.93, 1.17) 257 (22.4) 1.04 (0.89, 1.21)
 Glyphosate 14086 (77.2) 1678 (81.5) 1.33 (1.18, 1.50) 991 (81.4) 1.31 (1.13, 1.53)
 Imazethapyr 7892 (46.9) 903 (47.4) 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) 511 (45.5) 0.93 (0.81, 1.08)
 Metolachlor 8338 (48.3) 978 (49.7) 1.02 (0.93, 1.13) 577 (49.6) 1.06 (0.93, 1.20)
 Paraquat 3905 (22.8) 480 (24.9) 1.15 (1.02, 1.29) 294 (25.8) 1.13 (0.97, 1.32)
 Pendimethalin 7663 (44.6) 885 (45.7) 1.04 (0.94, 1.14) 534 (46.8) 1.09 (0.96, 1.23)
 Petroleum distillates 8490 (49.9) 1070 (55.5) 1.16 (1.05, 1.28) 631 (55.6) 1.19 (1.05, 1.35)
 Trifluralin 9091 (55.5) 1111 (60.0) 1.07 (0.95, 1.21) 637 (58.4) 1.03 (0.89, 1.19)
 2,4-D 14175 (78.0) 1692 (82.3) 1.14 (1.00, 1.29) 992 (81.5) 1.11 (0.95, 1.31)
 2,4,5-T 3738 (22.1) 563 (29.4) 1.22 (1.08, 1.39) 343 (30.5) 1.24 (1.06, 1.45)
 2,4,5-TP 1666 (9.9) 221 (11.5) 0.88 (0.74, 1.04) 138 (12.3) 0.91 (0.73, 1.12)
 Atrazine 13400 (73.4) 1579 (76.9) 1.09 (0.97, 1.22) 929 (76.5) 1.10 (0.94, 1.27)
 Cyanazine 7748 (44.9) 949 (48.5) 1.06 (0.95, 1.17) 562 (48.6) 1.13 (0.98, 1.29)
 Metribuzin 8089 (49.0) 1012 (54.1) 1.08 (0.96, 1.21) 590 (53.6) 1.13 (0.97, 1.31)

Abbreviation: 2,4-D, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2,4,5-T, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2,4,5-T,P, 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) propionic acid; CI, Confidence Intervals; CCl4/CS2, Carbon tetrachloride/Carbon disulfide 80/20 mix; DDT, Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; EPTC, S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate; OI, Olfactory Impairment; OR, Odds Ratio

a

All olfactory impairment cases

b

Olfactory impairment with onset reported ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up

c

Odds ratios are adjusted for age, sex, state of residence, education, smoking status, ever performed following tasks at least once each year (repair engines, replace asbestos brake linings, handle stored grain, work in swine confinement areas, weld and paint), and correlated pesticides (correlated ever-use of pesticides with Spearman correlation ≥ 0.40); correlated pesticides are not adjusted for overall lifetime days.

In the IWLD analyses (Table 3), we found statistically significant trends (P for trend ≤ 0.05) for two organochlorine insecticides (DDT and lindane), two organophosphate insecticides (diazinon and malathion), permethrin use on crops, the fungicide captan, and six herbicides (glyphosate, metolachlor, petroleum distillates, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and metribuzin). Although ORs were generally elevated for higher exposure categories as compared to never use, for some of these, OR estimates did not show a clear, monotonic exposure-response pattern. For metolachlor, the trend was inverse. Results were generally similar when we excluded self-reported Parkinson’s disease cases from the analysis (Supplementary Table 4).

Table 3.

Intensity weighted lifetime days of use of pesticides at enrollment in relation to self-reported olfactory impairment reported in the third follow-up in the Agricultural Health Study (n=20,409), Iowa and North Carolina

Pesticides Exposurea No OI (n (%)) Any OIb (n=20,409) Time-restricted OIc (n=19,563)
OI (n (%)) OR (95% CI) P-trend OI (n (%)) OR (95% CI) P-trend
Insecticide
Organochlorine
Aldrind Never 8080 (83.9) 849 (75.7) Ref 0.25 477 (74.2) Ref 0.30
>0–315 565 (5.9) 96 (8.6) 1.10 (0.86, 1.41) 59 (9.2) 1.16 (0.85, 1.58)
>315–952 489 (5.1) 77 (6.9) 1.00 (0.76, 1.31) 47 (7.3) 1.05 (0.74, 1.48)
>952 501 (5.2) 99 (8.8) 1.18 (0.91, 1.53) 60 (9.3) 1.21 (0.88, 1.68)
Chlordaned Never 8080 (82.0) 857 (73.2) Ref 0.08 500 (74.2) Ref 0.35
>0–231 580 (5.9) 108 (9.2) 1.46 (1.17, 1.83) 58 (8.6) 1.29 (0.96, 1.73)
>231–637 607 (6.2) 104 (8.9) 1.29 (1.03, 1.63) 55 (8.2) 1.12 (0.83, 1.52)
>637 586 (5.9) 102 (8.7) 1.24 (0.98, 1.56) 61 (9.1) 1.16 (0.87, 1.56)
Dieldrind Never 9363 (96.7) 1074 (94.5) Ref 0.63 615 (94.9) Ref 0.17
>0–210 114 (1.2) 22 (1.9) 1.06 (0.66, 1.70) 14 (2.2) 1.12 (0.63, 2.00)
>210–653 94 (1.0) 23 (2.0) 1.31 (0.82, 2.11) 12 (1.9) 1.15 (0.61, 2.14)
>653 111 (1.1) 17 (1.5) 0.82 (0.49, 1.40) 7 (1.1) 0.55 (0.25, 1.21)
DDTd Never 7873 (81.3) 794 (69.5) Ref 0.02 440 (66.7) Ref 0.01
>0–328 601 (6.2) 115 (10.1) 1.33 (1.06, 1.68) 71 (10.8) 1.40 (1.05, 1.86)
>328–1583 622 (6.4) 113 (9.9) 1.26 (1.00, 1.59) 67 (10.2) 1.23 (0.91, 1.65)
>1583 592 (6.1) 121 (10.6) 1.38 (1.10, 1.74) 82 (12.4) 1.54 (1.17, 2.03)
Heptachlord Never 8535 (88.1) 938 (82.4) Ref 0.32 545 (83.6) Ref 0.88
>0–289 396 (4.1) 60 (5.3) 0.99 (0.73, 1.33) 37 (5.7) 0.99 (0.68, 1.43)
>289–893 384 (4.0) 71 (6.2) 1.18 (0.89, 1.56) 30 (4.6) 0.81 (0.54, 1.20)
>893 374 (3.9) 69 (6.1) 1.13 (0.85, 1.51) 40 (6.1) 1.05 (0.73, 1.50)
Toxaphened Never 9303 (90.1) 1050 (85.7) Ref 0.27 613 (86.5) Ref 0.66
>0–298 344 (3.3) 57 (4.7) 1.26 (0.94, 1.69) 33 (4.7) 1.25 (0.86, 1.81)
>298–1050 335 (3.2) 67 (5.5) 1.49 (1.13, 1.96) 33 (4.7) 1.24 (0.85, 1.80)
>1050 344 (3.3) 51 (4.2) 1.12 (0.82, 1.53) 30 (4.2) 1.06 (0.72, 1.57)
Lindaned Never 8777 (85.5) 957 (78.4) Ref <.0001 552 (78.3) Ref 0.0006
>0–315 513 (5.0) 83 (6.8) 1.31 (1.03, 1.68) 45 (6.4) 1.27 (0.92, 1.75)
>315–1176 498 (4.9) 85 (7.0) 1.42 (1.11, 1.82) 54 (7.7) 1.62 (1.20, 2.18)
>1176 474 (4.6) 95 (7.8) 1.64 (1.29, 2.07) 54 (7.7) 1.60 (1.18, 2.17)
Carbamate
Aldicarbd Never 9177 (93.3) 1099 (94.3) Ref 0.09 629 (93.6) Ref 0.33
>0–613 213 (2.2) 25 (2.1) 1.05 (0.68, 1.62) 15 (2.2) 1.07 (0.61, 1.85)
>613–2408 223 (2.3) 26 (2.2) 1.05 (0.68, 1.62) 17 (2.5) 1.16 (0.68, 1.98)
>2408 227 (2.3) 16 (1.4) 0.63 (0.37, 1.07) 11 (1.6) 0.72 (0.38, 1.37)
Carbaryld Never 5720 (58.8) 605 (52.5) Ref 0.90 341 (51.7) Ref 0.96
>0–341 1347 (13.9) 184 (16.0) 1.16 (0.97, 1.39) 106 (16.1) 1.19 (0.94, 1.50)
>341–2015 1351 (13.9) 204 (17.7) 1.33 (1.11, 1.60) 116 (17.6) 1.30 (1.03, 1.65)
>2015 1302 (13.4) 159 (13.8) 1.11 (0.88, 1.39) 96 (14.6) 1.10 (0.83, 1.46)
Carbofuran Never 12129 (71.4) 1277 (66.0) Ref 0.51 753 (65.8) Ref 0.99
>0–350 1600 (9.4) 239 (12.3) 1.27 (1.09, 1.47) 134 (11.7) 1.20 (0.99, 1.46)
>350–1260 1631 (9.6) 221 (11.4) 1.16 (1.00, 1.36) 142 (12.4) 1.25 (1.03, 1.50)
>1260 1616 (9.5) 199 (10.3) 1.06 (0.90, 1.25) 115 (10.1) 0.99 (0.81, 1.22)
Organophosphate
Chlorpyrifos Never 9449 (54.9) 1023 (51.9) Ref 0.64 607 (52.2) Ref 0.99
>0–435 2532 (14.7) 344 (17.5) 1.26 (1.10, 1.44) 199 (17.1) 1.25 (1.05, 1.48)
>435–1715 2658 (15.4) 305 (15.5) 1.06 (0.93, 1.22) 185 (15.9) 1.09 (0.92, 1.30)
>1715 2573 (14.9) 299 (15.2) 1.07 (0.94, 1.23) 172 (14.8) 1.04 (0.87, 1.24)
Coumaphos Never 15223 (90.6) 1693 (88.9) Ref 0.99 1007 (89.6) Ref 0.34
>0–394 539 (3.2) 77 (4.0) 1.19 (0.93, 1.53) 42 (3.7) 1.09 (0.79, 1.51)
>394–1369 513 (3.1) 76 (4.0) 1.26 (0.98, 1.61) 46 (4.1) 1.29 (0.94, 1.76)
>1369 531 (3.2) 59 (3.1) 0.95 (0.72, 1.26) 29 (2.6) 0.78 (0.53, 1.15)
Diazinond Never 7891 (79.4) 866 (72.9) Ref 0.01 500 (73.2) Ref 0.18
>0–515 698 (7.0) 118 (9.9) 1.45 (1.17, 1.79) 70 (10.2) 1.47 (1.12, 1.92)
>515–3923 679 (6.8) 99 (8.3) 1.22 (0.97, 1.54) 55 (8.1) 1.15 (0.85, 1.55)
>3923 668 (6.7) 105 (8.8) 1.40 (1.11, 1.76) 58 (8.5) 1.26 (0.93, 1.70)
Dichlorvos Never 14949 (87.8) 1630 (84.3) Ref 0.08 974 (85.0) Ref 0.06
>0–315 691 (4.1) 93 (4.8) 1.15 (0.92, 1.44) 47 (4.1) 1.00 (0.74, 1.37)
>315–1143 697 (4.1) 111 (5.7) 1.33 (1.08, 1.64) 64 (5.6) 1.33 (1.02, 1.75)
>1143 684 (4.0) 99 (5.1) 1.22 (0.98, 1.52) 61 (5.3) 1.29 (0.98, 1.70)
Fonofos Never 13149 (76.8) 1461 (75.0) Ref 0.39 869 (75.4) Ref 0.47
>0–429 1289 (7.5) 183 (9.4) 1.19 (1.01, 1.41) 105 (9.1) 1.19 (0.96, 1.48)
>429–1550 1371 (8) 147 (7.5) 0.87 (0.72, 1.04) 87 (7.6) 0.90 (0.71, 1.13)
>1550 1310 (7.7) 158 (8.1) 0.95 (0.80, 1.14) 91 (7.9) 0.94 (0.75, 1.19)
Malathiond Never 3562 (34.8) 345 (28.3) Ref 0.01 182 (26.0) Ref 0.01
>0–360 2215 (21.6) 281 (23.1) 1.24 (1.05, 1.47) 165 (23.5) 1.44 (1.15, 1.80)
>360–1344 2290 (22.4) 280 (23.0) 1.17 (0.98, 1.38) 169 (24.1) 1.39 (1.11, 1.74)
>1344 2172 (21.2) 311 (25.6) 1.33 (1.13, 1.58) 185 (26.4) 1.50 (1.21, 1.87)
Parathiond Never 9549 (93.1) 1099 (90.5) Ref 0.23 638 (91.3) Ref 0.54
>0–315 232 (2.3) 41 (3.4) 1.41 (1.00, 1.99) 23 (3.3) 1.32 (0.85, 2.06)
>315–1700 239 (2.3) 40 (3.3) 1.39 (0.98, 1.98) 18 (2.6) 1.01 (0.62, 1.66)
>1700 237 (2.3) 34 (2.8) 1.22 (0.84, 1.77) 20 (2.9) 1.17 (0.73, 1.88)
Phorated Never 6682 (67.8) 741 (63.6) Ref 0.64 438 (65.1) Ref 0.15
>0–315 1082 (11) 148 (12.7) 1.09 (0.90, 1.32) 82 (12.2) 1.05 (0.81, 1.35)
>315–1117 1036 (10.5) 147 (12.6) 1.16 (0.96, 1.41) 90 (13.4) 1.26 (0.99, 1.61)
>1117 1057 (10.7) 130 (11.1) 0.95 (0.78, 1.17) 63 (9.4) 0.80 (0.61, 1.05)
Terbufos Never 10133 (59.3) 1099 (56.4) Ref 0.07 652 (56.9) Ref 0.06
>0–621 2300 (13.5) 278 (14.3) 1.08 (0.94, 1.25) 163 (14.2) 1.13 (0.94, 1.35)
>621–2279 2387 (14.0) 272 (14.0) 1.00 (0.87, 1.16) 149 (13.0) 0.96 (0.79, 1.16)
>2279 2274 (13.3) 299 (15.3) 1.15 (1.00, 1.33) 182 (15.9) 1.21 (1.01, 1.44)
Permethrin
Permethrin (crops) Never 14678 (86.7) 1625 (84.9) Ref 0.001 962 (85) Ref 0.001
>0–245 744 (4.4) 94 (4.9) 1.15 (0.92, 1.44) 54 (4.8) 1.16 (0.87, 1.55)
>245–963 779 (4.6) 89 (4.6) 1.09 (0.87, 1.37) 46 (4.1) 0.99 (0.73, 1.34)
>963 726 (4.3) 106 (5.5) 1.42 (1.15, 1.76) 70 (6.2) 1.55 (1.19,2.01)
Permethrin (animals) Never 14557 (84.9) 1610 (82.7) Ref 0.38 950 (82.6) Ref 0.28
>0–350 845 (4.9) 125 (6.4) 1.39 (1.14, 1.70) 73 (6.3) 1.48 (1.15, 1.92)
>350–1382 886 (5.2) 110 (5.6) 1.16 (0.94, 1.43) 68 (5.9) 1.31 (1.01, 1.70)
>1382 866 (5.0) 102 (5.2) 1.10 (0.89, 1.37) 59 (5.1) 1.15 (0.87, 1.52)
Fumigant
CCl4/CS2d Never 9947 (96.2) 1146 (93.5) Ref 0.11 651 (91.9) Ref 0.01
>0–63 129 (1.2) 27 (2.2) 1.44 (0.94,2.20) 19 (2.7) 1.83 (1.12, 3.01)
>63–331 136 (1.3) 26 (2.1) 1.22 (0.79, 1.87) 18 (2.5) 1.48 (0.89, 2.46)
>331 125 (1.2) 27 (2.2) 1.40 (0.91, 2.14) 20 (2.8) 1.80 (1.10, 2.95)
Aluminum phosphided Never 9963 (96.3) 1181 (95.8) Ref 0.67 681 (95.6) Ref 0.90
>0–56 124 (1.2) 21 (1.7) 1.37 (0.85,2.20) 14 (2.0) 1.68 (0.95,2.95)
>56–248 128 (1.2) 18 (1.5) 1.16 (0.70, 1.92) 9 (1.3) 1.05 (0.53, 2.09)
>248 130 (1.3) 13 (1.1) 0.84 (0.47, 1.51) 8 (1.1) 0.93 (0.45, 1.92)
Ethylene dibromided Never 9937 (96) 1182 (95.6) Ref 0.56 679 (95.4) Ref 0.18
>0–196 138 (1.3) 18 (1.5) 1.15 (0.69, 1.90) 7 (1.0) 0.77 (0.36, 1.67)
>196–919 137 (1.3) 19 (1.5) 1.24 (0.75, 2.04) 12 (1.7) 1.31 (0.71, 2.42)
>919 135 (1.3) 18 (1.5) 1.14 (0.68, 1.90) 14 (2.0) 1.45 (0.81, 2.58)
Methyl bromide Never 14751 (86.6) 1673 (86.9) Ref 0.55 971 (85.9) Ref 0.27
>0–294 740 (4.3) 81 (4.2) 1.01 (0.79, 1.31) 50 (4.4) 1.00 (0.73, 1.37)
>294–1260 782 (4.6) 90 (4.7) 1.05 (0.81, 1.36) 61 (5.4) 1.09 (0.80, 1.48)
>1260 765 (4.5) 81 (4.2) 0.93 (0.71, 1.21) 49 (4.3) 0.83 (0.59, 1.17)
Fungicide
Benomyld Never 8915 (93.5) 1040 (92.3) Ref 0.15 593 (91.7) Ref 0.07
>0–343 199 (2.1) 36 (3.2) 1.66 (1.13, 2.43) 21 (3.2) 1.73 (1.07, 2.81)
>343–1773 220 (2.3) 20 (1.8) 0.87 (0.53, 1.45) 12 (1.9) 0.95 (0.50, 1.79)
>1773 197 (2.1) 31 (2.8) 1.47 (0.94, 2.28) 21 (3.2) 1.73 (1.02, 2.95)
Captan Never 14920 (89.3) 1647 (86.9) Ref 0.05 977 (86.5) Ref 0.10
>0–9 667 (4.0) 90 (4.7) 1.21 (0.96, 1.53) 51 (4.5) 1.22 (0.91, 1.64)
>9–161 528 (3.2) 74 (3.9) 1.24 (0.96, 1.59) 48 (4.3) 1.39 (1.02, 1.89)
>161 584 (3.5) 85 (4.5) 1.29 (1.02, 1.64) 53 (4.7) 1.30 (0.97, 1.75)
Chlorothalonil Never 15917 (93.7) 1788 (93.4) Ref 0.94 1048 (92.6) Ref 0.41
>0–539 345 (2.0) 47 (2.5) 1.29 (0.93, 1.78) 29 (2.6) 1.31 (0.88, 1.95)
>539–3080 362 (2.1) 44 (2.3) 1.20 (0.85, 1.69) 28 (2.5) 1.22 (0.80, 1.87)
>3080 372 (2.2) 36 (1.9) 1.00 (0.69, 1.46) 27 (2.4) 1.22 (0.79, 1.89)
Maneb/Mancozebd Never 9130 (93.1) 1086 (93.1) Ref 0.82 618 (92.1) Ref 0.58
>0–425 232 (2.4) 22 (1.9) 0.81 (0.51, 1.28) 14 (2.1) 0.89 (0.50, 1.56)
>425–2688 232 (2.4) 30 (2.6) 1.05 (0.69, 1.60) 20 (3.0) 1.20 (0.72, 1.99)
>2688 216 (2.2) 28 (2.4) 1.03 (0.67, 1.58) 19 (2.8) 1.14 (0.68, 1.91)
Metalaxyld Never 8425 (82.8) 995 (82.2) Ref 0.14 573 (82.2) Ref 0.64
>0–239 578 (5.7) 73 (6.0) 1.07 (0.83, 1.38) 41 (5.9) 1.03 (0.74, 1.44)
>239–1323 599 (5.9) 69 (5.7) 1.13 (0.85, 1.51) 41 (5.9) 1.06 (0.73, 1.53)
>1323 577 (5.7) 73 (6.0) 1.28 (0.94, 1.74) 42 (6.0) 1.11 (0.75, 1.64)
Herbicide
Alachlor Never 7629 (44.9) 794 (41.0) Ref 0.08 478 (41.7) Ref 0.19
>0–788 3131 (18.4) 358 (18.5) 1.01 (0.88, 1.16) 206 (18.0) 0.99 (0.84, 1.18)
>788–2958 3153 (18.6) 391 (20.2) 1.10 (0.97, 1.26) 228 (19.9) 1.09 (0.92, 1.29)
>2958 3070 (18.1) 393 (20.3) 1.13 (0.99, 1.29) 235 (20.5) 1.11 (0.94, 1.32)
Butylated Never 6975 (71.1) 790 (67.8) Ref 0.17 462 (68.8) Ref 0.31
>0–455 949 (9.7) 126 (10.8) 1.08 (0.87, 1.32) 73 (10.9) 1.08 (0.83, 1.41)
>455–1512 974 (9.9) 117 (10.0) 0.96 (0.78, 1.19) 60 (8.9) 0.86 (0.65, 1.15)
>1512 916 (9.3) 133 (11.4) 1.17 (0.95, 1.44) 77 (11.5) 1.18 (0.90, 1.53)
Chlorimuron ethyld Never 7021 (68.1) 828 (67.3) Ref 0.58 485 (68.3) Ref 0.62
>0–236 1130 (11.0) 141 (11.5) 1.09 (0.90, 1.32) 80 (11.3) 1.11 (0.86, 1.42)
>236–662 1076 (10.4) 131 (10.7) 1.04 (0.85, 1.26) 69 (9.7) 0.96 (0.74, 1.26)
>662 1089 (10.6) 130 (10.6) 1.06 (0.87, 1.30) 76 (10.7) 1.08 (0.84, 1.40)
Dicamba Never 7694 (45.3) 793 (41.0) Ref 0.68 493 (43.2) Ref 0.95
>0–551 3080 (18.1) 379 (19.6) 1.15 (1.00, 1.33) 214 (18.8) 1.12 (0.93, 1.35)
>551–2170 3166 (18.6) 396 (20.5) 1.14 (0.99, 1.32) 229 (20.1) 1.13 (0.94, 1.36)
>2170 3063 (18.0) 366 (18.9) 1.09 (0.94, 1.26) 205 (18.0) 1.04 (0.87, 1.26)
EPTC Never 13352 (78.9) 1487 (77.3) Ref 0.38 889 (77.9) Ref 0.55
>0–315 1212 (7.2) 132 (6.9) 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) 77 (6.7) 0.95 (0.75, 1.22)
>315–1176 1217 (7.2) 160 (8.3) 1.12 (0.94, 1.34) 93 (8.2) 1.13 (0.90, 1.42)
>1176 1147 (6.8) 144 (7.5) 1.07 (0.89, 1.28) 82 (7.2) 1.06 (0.83, 1.34)
Glyphosate Never 4163 (23.0) 381 (18.6) Ref 0.00 226 (18.7) Ref 0.02
>0–672 4590 (25.4) 573 (28) 1.38 (1.21, 1.59) 340 (28.1) 1.39 (1.16, 1.65)
>672–2610 4748 (26.3) 523 (25.6) 1.22 (1.06, 1.41) 302 (25.0) 1.17 (0.98, 1.41)
>2610 4572 (25.3) 567 (27.7) 1.41 (1.22, 1.62) 342 (28.3) 1.40 (1.17, 1.68)
Imazethapyr Never 8934 (53.6) 1000 (52.9) Ref 0.65 611 (54.8) Ref 0.86
>0–338 2545 (15.3) 310 (16.4) 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) 172 (15.4) 0.97 (0.80, 1.18)
>338–992 2677 (16.1) 287 (15.2) 0.88 (0.76, 1.03) 163 (14.6) 0.88 (0.72, 1.07)
>992 2519 (15.1) 294 (15.5) 0.97 (0.83, 1.13) 168 (15.1) 0.98 (0.80, 1.19)
Metolachlor Never 8916 (52.2) 988 (50.6) Ref 0.05 586 (50.5) Ref 0.21
>0–720 2704 (15.8) 367 (18.8) 1.20 (1.05, 1.36) 217 (18.7) 1.25 (1.05, 1.47)
>720–2604 2756 (16.1) 315 (16.1) 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) 191 (16.5) 1.06 (0.89, 1.26)
>2604 2693 (15.8) 282 (14.4) 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) 166 (14.3) 0.94 (0.78, 1.13)
Paraquatd Never 8817 (85.4) 1022 (83.2) Ref 0.11 589 (83.1) Ref 0.09
>0–275 501 (4.9) 68 (5.5) 1.17 (0.90, 1.53) 38 (5.4) 1.14 (0.80, 1.61)
>275–1080 507 (4.9) 72 (5.9) 1.29 (0.98, 1.68) 40 (5.6) 1.24 (0.88, 1.76)
>1080 498 (4.8) 66 (5.4) 1.27 (0.95, 1.70) 42 (5.9) 1.38 (0.96, 1.97)
Pendimethalind Never 6521 (63.2) 755 (61.3) Ref 0.55 440 (62.1) Ref 0.73
>0–315 1282 (12.4) 154 (12.5) 1.01 (0.84, 1.21) 92 (13.0) 1.06 (0.83, 1.34)
>315–1176 1250 (12.1) 180 (14.6) 1.28 (1.07, 1.53) 94 (13.3) 1.18 (0.93, 1.49)
>1176 1264 (12.3) 143 (11.6) 1.03 (0.85, 1.25) 82 (11.6) 1.03 (0.80, 1.33)
Petroleum distillatesd Never 8058 (78.7) 911 (74.1) Ref 0.03 530 (74.6) Ref 0.05
>0–502 733 (7.2) 100 (8.1) 1.18 (0.94, 1.47) 55 (7.7) 1.15 (0.86, 1.54)
>502–2438 734 (7.2) 112 (9.1) 1.34 (1.09, 1.67) 63 (8.9) 1.35 (1.02, 1.78)
>2438 717 (7.0) 106 (8.6) 1.27 (1.02, 1.58) 62 (8.7) 1.31 (0.99, 1.74)
Trifluralin Never 7297 (45.1) 742 (40.5) Ref 0.11 453 (42.2) Ref 0.16
>0–1020 2960 (18.3) 331 (18.1) 1.02 (0.88, 1.19) 180 (16.8) 0.95 (0.78, 1.15)
>1020–3875 3030 (18.7) 377 (20.6) 1.11 (0.95, 1.28) 216 (20.1) 1.07 (0.89, 1.29)
>3875 2897 (17.9) 382 (20.9) 1.13 (0.98, 1.32) 225 (20.9) 1.12 (0.92, 1.35)
2,4-D Never 4001 (22.3) 364 (17.9) Ref 0.05 225 (18.8) Ref 0.26
>0–1302 4646 (25.9) 516 (25.4) 1.14 (0.98, 1.31) 312 (26.0) 1.16 (0.96, 1.39)
>1302–5208 4858 (27.0) 548 (27.0) 1.08 (0.93, 1.26) 309 (25.8) 1.03 (0.85, 1.24)
>5208 4459 (24.8) 600 (29.6) 1.20 (1.03, 1.39) 354 (29.5) 1.16 (0.96, 1.40)
2,4,5-Td Never 7999 (82.2) 828 (71.6) Ref 0.05 472 (70.9) Ref 0.23
>0–280 568 (5.8) 116 (10.0) 1.64 (1.32, 2.05) 74 (11.1) 1.82 (1.38, 2.38)
>280–971 586 (6.0) 117 (10.1) 1.65 (1.32, 2.07) 65 (9.8) 1.56 (1.17, 2.08)
>971 579 (5.9) 95 (8.2) 1.33 (1.05, 1.70) 55 (8.3) 1.29 (0.95, 1.75)
2,4,5-TPd Never 9291 (95.3) 1071 (92.5) Ref 0.25 621 (93.1) Ref 0.72
>0–315 159 (1.6) 26 (2.2) 1.16 (0.75, 1.79) 15 (2.2) 1.12 (0.64, 1.94)
>315–1250 148 (1.5) 35 (3.0) 1.66 (1.13, 2.44) 20 (3.0) 1.62 (0.99, 2.64)
>1250 148 (1.5) 26 (2.2) 1.20 (0.78, 1.85) 11 (1.6) 0.82 (0.44, 1.54)
Atrazine Never 4859 (26.9) 473 (23.2) Ref 0.50 286 (23.7) Ref 0.55
>0–1054 4386 (24.2) 509 (25.0) 1.12 (0.98, 1.29) 300 (24.9) 1.15 (0.96, 1.37)
>1054–4340 4530 (25.0) 523 (25.7) 1.07 (0.93, 1.23) 302 (25.0) 1.06 (0.89, 1.27)
>4340 4318 (23.9) 531 (26.1) 1.10 (0.96, 1.27) 318 (26.4) 1.12 (0.94, 1.34)
Cyanazine Never 9485 (55.6) 1007 (51.7) Ref 0.33 594 (51.6) Ref 0.56
>0–539 2503 (14.7) 321 (16.5) 1.12 (0.97, 1.29) 189 (16.4) 1.20 (1.00, 1.43)
>539–2200 2592 (15.2) 301 (15.5) 1.00 (0.86, 1.15) 190 (16.5) 1.13 (0.95, 1.36)
>2200 2490 (14.6) 318 (16.3) 1.10 (0.95, 1.27) 178 (15.5) 1.11 (0.92, 1.33)
Metribuzind Never 5550 (58.3) 605 (53.6) Ref 0.02 359 (55.1) Ref 0.37
>0–315 1323 (13.9) 156 (13.8) 0.99 (0.81, 1.21) 100 (15.4) 1.14 (0.88, 1.46)
>315–1000 1361 (14.3) 176 (15.6) 1.10 (0.91, 1.34) 93 (14.3) 1.04 (0.81, 1.35)
>1000 1286 (13.5) 191 (16.9) 1.24 (1.02, 1.50) 99 (15.2) 1.15 (0.89, 1.48)

Abbreviation: 2,4-D, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2,4,5-T, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2,4,5-T,P, 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) propionic acid; CI, Confidence Intervals; CCl4/CS2, Carbon tetrachloride/Carbon disulfide 80/20 mix; DDT, Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; EPTC, S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate; OI, Olfactory Impairment; OR, Odds Ratio

a

Exposure categories: Never use and categorized into tertiles among users

b

All olfactory impairment cases

c

Olfactory impairment with onset reported ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up

d

Odds ratios are adjusted for age, sex, state of residence, education, smoking status, ever performed following tasks at least once each year (repair engines, replace asbestos brake linings, handle stored grain, work in swine confinement areas, weld and paint), and correlated pesticides (correlated ever-use of pesticides with Spearman correlation ≥ 0.40)

e

Frequency and duration of pesticide was asked only in the take-home questionnaire

The results were similar when we used unweighted lifetime days of pesticide use (Supplementary Table 5). However, in the analysis that examined average days per year of use, we noted that associations were much stronger for those who reported more frequent days per year and that dose-response was more apparent than for other lifetime measures for organochlorine insecticides toxaphene [OR: 2.31 (95% CI: 1.26, 4.25)] and lindane [OR: 3.07 (95% CI: 1.76, 5.35)], fungicide metalaxyl [OR: 1.74 (95% CI: 1.11, 2.73)], and herbicides paraquat [OR: 2.06 (95%CI: 1.13, 3.75)] (Supplementary Table 6).

When we restricted analyses to participants who reported olfactory impairment with onset reported ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up (Table 3), overall results were similar but the P for trend for a few pesticides were no longer statistically significant; these results were similar to those examining IWLD of pesticides through the first follow-up in relation to olfactory impairment with onset reported ≤ 10 years before the third follow-up (Supplementary Table 7). In the analysis that examined ever-use of pesticides in relation to olfactory impairment using inverse probability of censoring weights, the results were generally similar (Supplementary Table 8).

DISCUSSION

In this large epidemiologic study of United States farmers, we found that occupational use of pesticides was associated with higher odds of reporting olfactory impairment. The association seems to be relatively broad, not limited to just a few pesticides and involving several chemical classes. The results were consistent across several sensitivity analyses. Overall, our data offer novel empirical evidence supporting the notion that occupational exposures to pesticides may harm human sense of smell.

Few epidemiological studies have explored the association between pesticides and poor olfaction in humans. There have been case reports of anosmia in individuals reporting exposure to unusually high levels of pesticides.[25,26] Other studies have examined farming in relation to olfaction, but findings are inconsistent.[27-29] For example, a study of olfaction among pesticide-exposed Latino farmworkers compared with non-farm workers (primarily construction or production workers) from North Carolina found no difference in performance in odor identification between the two groups, but found that farmworkers performed poorly as compared with non-farmers in an olfactory threshold test.[29] This difference in olfactory threshold between the groups persisted over a 2-year follow-up period.[28] In contrast, another study conducted among attendants of an agricultural trade show in Nebraska found no association between farming and olfactory function.[27]

In a prior analysis of AHS farmers, a history of unusually high pesticide exposure events was associated with elevated olfactory impairment, and the association was stronger if there was a longer delay in cleaning with soap and water.[18] These associations were statistically significant for the organochlorine insecticides DDT and lindane and the herbicides alachlor, metolachlor, 2,4-D, and pendimethalin. Notably, our current investigation also found similar associations for occupational use of organochlorine insecticides DDT and lindane for both ever-use and IWLD analyses, and for the herbicide 2,4-D among the highest users compared to never users. To our knowledge, no epidemiologic studies have found specific pesticides to be associated with olfactory impairment. However, Bello and Dumancas[30] reported an association for urinary levels of 2,4-dichlorophenol (a precursor and environmental degradate of 2,4-D and other chlorophenols) and olfactory impairment among participants aged ≥ 40 years in a cross-sectional analysis of the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.

Our study is the first epidemiological study to comprehensively examine occupational use of pesticides and olfactory impairment among farmers. We found modest associations with several pesticides. These observations are biologically plausible as pesticides may cause olfactory impairment via both peripheral and central nervous systems.[8,10] Inhaled pesticides may damage the olfactory epithelium and olfactory receptor neurons by inducing oxidative stress, acute or chronic inflammation, and pathophysiological changes (for example, hyperplasia and metaplasia). Pesticides that find their way to the brain via olfactory structures, by bypassing the blood brain barrier, or via ingestion may affect olfaction-associated central nervous system processes and neurotransmitter systems resulting in diminished olfactory abilities. Further, pesticides that enter through the olfactory structures or the digestive tract may initiate synucleinopathy in the olfactory bulb and the gut, which may later spread to brain, as posited by the Braak hypothesis.[9] Over time, these peripheral and central mechanisms may individually or synergistically contribute to age-related olfactory impairment and neurodegeneration.

Pesticides have also been shown to alter olfactory function in animals including honeybees, fish, and rodents.[15-17] For example, intraperitoneal administration of paraquat in rats has been shown to impair olfactory discrimination ability.[15] Similarly, exposures to the organophosphate insecticides diazinon[31] and malathion[32] and herbicide glyphosate[16] have been shown to alter olfactory responses in salmonids. The pesticides diazinon, malathion, and glyphosate, either ever-use or IWLD, were also linked with olfactory deficits in our current analysis. Some of these pesticides associated with olfactory impairment were also associated with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases and poor cognitive function in prior studies.[11,12,14] For example, the organophosphate insecticides diazinon, malathion, and parathion,[33] the fungicide captan,[34] the herbicides paraquat,[12] 2,4-D,[35] and 2,4,5-T[36] have been associated with PD. Likewise, higher serum levels of DDT were associated with increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease.[14] While our study limits us from making causal inferences about pesticides’ roles in the development of olfactory impairment and their relevance to prodromal neurodegeneration, current findings may provide clues for future investigations.

The 10% prevalence of self-reported olfactory impairment in the current study is similar to the prevalence observed in other studies.[1,2,37] However, self-reported olfactory impairment is subject to error. Self-reported olfactory impairment has low sensitivity (ranging from < 20% to > 60%) but good specificity (ranging 80% to > 90%) compared to objective smell identification tests that are often the choice for use in epidemiologic studies.[1,2,37] Self-reported olfactory impairment relies on one’s ability to notice potential impairment and cannot differentiate various modalities of the impairment (for example, identification vs. threshold or discrimination). Further, we asked about olfactory impairment once about twenty years after study enrollment, and we used predefined categories to capture age at onset. Future epidemiological studies need to confirm our findings with objectively evaluated olfactory impairment and to assess whether pesticide exposures impact various domains of olfaction.

We considered a range of covariates and co-exposures as potential confounders in our analysis; still, some of the observed associations could be explained by inadequate control of confounding. For example, the AHS did not collect information on conditions such as chronic sinonasal disease that may affect both olfaction and pesticide use, and information on head injury and a history of high pesticide exposure events was available only for the subset that returned the take-home questionnaire. Additionally, we did not consider other environmental exposures in our analysis that may have confounded our results.

Information on specific pesticides was also based on self-reports. However, self-reports can capture lifetime exposures better than biomarkers that only represent a snapshot of pesticide use given the short half-lives of most pesticides. AHS pesticide applicators have been shown to provide reliable and plausible information on specific pesticide uses. For example, in a subsample of 4088 AHS participants in Iowa who completed the same questionnaire 1 year after their enrollment, the agreement for ever/never use of specific pesticides and application practices ranged from 70% to > 90%; although somewhat lower agreement, ranging from 50 to 71%, was found for duration, frequency, and decade first applied for the specific pesticides.[38] Further, in a comparison of AHS participant’s responses on the decade of first use and duration of use for specific pesticides to the year the pesticides were first registered for use in the US, <7% reported first use before pesticide registration date and < 5% participants overestimated their duration of use.[39]

We restricted our analysis to those who completed the third follow up when we first asked about olfactory deficit. Selective attrition that may have resulted from pesticide exposure or factors associated with olfactory dysfunction may have biased our results. We did not observe any influence on effect estimates when we corrected for potential selection bias using inverse probability of censoring weights, and a prior AHS study also suggested no evidence of bias when exposure and outcome are not strongly associated with participation (as likely in our current investigation).[40] However, we cannot rule out potential selection bias. In addition, we made multiple comparisons and some findings could be due to chance.

Further, our results may not be generalizable to populations with relatively lower levels of pesticide exposure or to seasonal or other farmworkers who are more racially and socioeconomically diverse than our study participants. Lastly, the current study focused on pesticides that were commonly used at the time of enrollment or in the past and did not account for pesticide exposure changes since the first follow up. Future studies on pesticides and olfaction should focus on newer pesticides as well as changes in pesticide exposures resulting from the regulatory and usage pattern changes.

Despite the limitations, ours is the first study that has comprehensively evaluated exposures to overall and specific pesticides in relation to olfactory function among older adults. Notably, we asked about sense of smell nineteen years after exposure assessment, and thus the results could not be readily explained by reverse causation. Further, we analyzed both overall and specific pesticide use in relation to olfactory impairment among farmers who have been shown to provide reliable and valid information on pesticide exposures.[38,39] Future studies need to confirm our findings with objectively assessed sense of smell.

Supplementary Material

Supp1

KEY MESSAGES.

What is already known about this subject?

  • Pesticide exposure may impair olfaction, but empirical evidence is very limited.

  • We know of only one epidemiologic investigation linking specific pesticides with olfactory impairment. That study, conducted within the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), found that unusually high pesticide exposure events are associated with higher odds of reporting a poor sense of smell, but it did not focus on long-term use of pesticides.

  • Olfactory impairment increases with age, is common in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, and could be an early sign of future neurodegenerative disease.

What are the new findings?

  • We report the first evidence of associations between chronic occupational exposure to many individual pesticides (covering several chemical classes) and olfactory impairment reported many years after exposure.

How might this impact on policy or clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

  • Because they represent the earliest evidence for associations between occupational uses of specific pesticides and self-reported olfactory impairment, these findings warrant confirmation in studies with objectively assessed sense of smell.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We used AHS data releases AHSREL20170600, AHSREL20170600, P1REL20170100, P2REL20170100, P3REL201808_00, and P4REL20180904 for the analysis. The study was approved by the Institutional review boards of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (North Carolina, protocol number 11-E-N196), and the National Cancer Institute (Maryland, protocol number OH93-NC-N013).

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES-049030) and National Cancer Institute (Z01-CP-010119). Dr. Chen is supported by the Michigan State University (GE100455), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES029227), the Parkinson’s Foundation (PF-IMP-1825), and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Parkinson’s Research Program (W81XWH-17-1-0536). Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.

Footnotes

COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

DATA SHARING STATEMENT

Requests for data, including the data used in this manuscript, are welcome as described on the Study Website (https://www.aghealth.nih.gov/collaboration/process.html). Data requests may be made directly at www.aghealthstars.com; registration is required. The Agricultural Health Study is an ongoing prospective study. The data sharing policy was developed to protect the privacy of study participants and is consistent with study informed consent documents as approved by the NIH Institutional Review Board. Dr. Dale Sandler is the NIEHS Principal Investigator of the Agricultural Health Study and is responsible for ensuring participant safety and privacy.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ et al. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 2002;288:2307–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dong J, Pinto JM, Guo X et al. The prevalence of anosmia and associated factors among U.S. black and white older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;72:1080–1086.doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T. Olfactory disorders and quality of life--an updated review. Chem Senses 2014;39:185–94.doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjt072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu B, Luo Z, Pinto JM et al. Relationship Between Poor Olfaction and Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2019;170:673–681.doi: 10.7326/M18-0775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schubert CR, Fischer ME, Pinto AA et al. Sensory impairments and risk of mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;72:710–715.doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen H, Shrestha S, Huang X et al. Olfaction and incident Parkinson disease in US white and black older adults. Neurology 2017;89:1441–1447.doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wilson RS, Arnold SE, Schneider JA et al. Olfactory impairment in presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1170:730–5.doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04013.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doty RL. Neurotoxic exposure and impairment of the chemical senses of taste and smell. Handb Clin Neurol 2015;131:299–324.doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-62627-1.00016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Braak H, Bohl JR, Muller CM et al. Stanley Fahn Lecture 2005: The staging procedure for the inclusion body pathology associated with sporadic Parkinson's disease reconsidered. Mov Disord 2006;21:2042–51.doi: 10.1002/mds.21065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rey NL, Wesson DW, Brundin P. The olfactory bulb as the entry site for prion-like propagation in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Dis 2018;109:226–248.doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim KS, Lee YM, Lee HW et al. Associations between organochlorine pesticides and cognition in U.S. elders: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Environ Int 2015;75:87–92.doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tanner CM, Kamel F, Ross GW et al. Rotenone, paraquat, and Parkinson's disease. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:866–72.doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldman SM, Musgrove RE, Jewell SA et al. Pesticides and Parkinson's Disease: Current Experimental and Epidemiological Evidence. In: Aschner M, Costa LG (eds.) Advances in Neurotoxicology: Environmental Factors in Neurodegenerative Diseases, Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2017;83–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richardson JR, Roy A, Shalat SL et al. Elevated serum pesticide levels and risk for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:284–90.doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.6030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Czemiczyniec A, Karadayian AG, Bustamante J et al. Paraquat induces behavioral changes and cortical and striatal mitochondrial dysfunction. Free Radic Biol Med 2011;51:1428–36.doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tierney KB, Singh CR, Ross PS et al. Relating olfactory neurotoxicity to altered olfactory-mediated behaviors in rainbow trout exposed to three currently-used pesticides. Aquat Toxicol 2007;81:55–64.doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Williamson SM, Wright GA. Exposure to multiple cholinergic pesticides impairs olfactory learning and memory in honeybees. J Exp Biol 2013;216:1799–807.doi: 10.1242/jeb.083931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shrestha S, Kamel F, Umbach DM et al. High Pesticide Exposure Events and Olfactory Impairment among U.S. Farmers. Environ Health Perspect 2019;127:17005.doi: 10.1289/EHP3713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alavanja MC, Sandler DP, McMaster SB et al. The Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104:362–9.doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tarone RE, Alavanja MC, Zahm SH et al. The Agricultural Health Study: factors affecting completion and return of self-administered questionnaires in a large prospective cohort study of pesticide applicators. Am J Ind Med 1997;31:233–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coble J, Thomas KW, Hines CJ et al. An updated algorithm for estimation of pesticide exposure intensity in the Agricultural Health Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011;8:4608–22.doi: 10.3390/ijerph8124608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shrestha S, Kamel F, Umbach DM et al. Nonmotor symptoms and Parkinson disease in United States farmers and spouses. PLoS One 2017;12:e0185510.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heltshe SL, Lubin JH, Koutros S et al. Using multiple imputation to assign pesticide use for non-responders in the follow-up questionnaire in the Agricultural Health Study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2012;22:409–16.doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howe CJ, Cole SR, Lau B et al. Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies. Epidemiology 2016;27:91–7.doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gobba F, Abbacchini C. Anosmia after exposure to a pyrethrin-based insecticide: a case report. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2012;25:506–12.doi: 10.2478/S13382-012-0060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ngamdu YB, Sandabe MB, Kodiya AM et al. Sudden anosmia due to otapiapia (organophosphate pesticide) exposure. Journal of Case Reports 2012;2:31–32 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Snyder MC, Leopold DA, Chiu BC et al. The relationship between agricultural environments and olfactory dysfunction. J Agric Saf Health 2003;9:211–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quandt SA, Walker FO, Talton JW et al. Olfactory function in latino farmworkers over 2 years: Longitudinal exploration of subclinical neurological effects of pesticide exposure. J Occup Environ Med 2017;59:1148–1152.doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Quandt SA, Walker FO, Talton JW et al. Olfactory Function in Latino Farmworkers: Subclinical Neurological Effects of Pesticide Exposure in a Vulnerable Population. J Occup Environ Med 2016;58:248–53.doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bello G, Dumancas G. Association of 2,4-dichlorophenol urinary concentrations and olfactory dysfunction in a national sample of middle-aged and older U.S. adults. Int J Environ Health Res 2017;27:498–508.doi: 10.1080/09603123.2017.1405245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moore A, Waring CP. Sublethal effects of the pesticide Diazinon on olfactory function in mature male Atlantic salmon parr. Journal of Fish Biology 1996;48:758–775.doi:DOI 10.1006/jfbi.1996.0075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang L, Espinoza HM, MacDonald JW et al. Olfactory transcriptional analysis of salmon exposed to mixtures of chlorpyrifos and malathion reveal novel molecular pathways of neurobehavioral injury. Toxicol Sci 2016;149:145–57.doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang A, Cockbum M, Ly TT et al. The association between ambient exposure to organophosphates and Parkinson's disease risk. Occup Environ Med 2014;71:275–81.doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fitzmaurice AG, Rhodes SL, Cockbum M et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase variation enhances effect of pesticides associated with Parkinson disease. Neurology 2014;82:419–26.doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tanner CM, Ross GW, Jewell SA et al. Occupation and risk of parkinsonism: a multicenter case-control study. Arch Neurol 2009;66:1106–13.doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shrestha S, Parks CG, Umbach DM et al. Pesticide use and incident Parkinson’s disease in a cohort of farmers and their spouses. Env Res In Press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adams DR, Wroblewski KE, Kem DW et al. Factors Associated with Inaccurate Self-Reporting of Olfactory Dysfunction in Older US Adults. Chem Senses 2016.doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Blair A, Tarone R, Sandler D et al. Reliability of reporting on life-style and agricultural factors by a sample of participants in the Agricultural Health Study from Iowa. Epidemiology 2002;13:94–9.doi: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hoppin JA, Yucel F, Dosemeci M et al. Accuracy of self-reported pesticide use duration information from licensed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2002; 12:313–8.doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rinsky JL, Richardson DB, Wing S et al. Assessing the Potential for Bias From Nonresponse to a Study Follow-up Interview: An Example From the Agricultural Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2017;186:395–404.doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp1

RESOURCES