Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Apr 22;10(16):e01372-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01372-20

Genome Sequence of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DmPark25_157, a Bacterial Strain Isolated from Drosophila melanogaster

Hunter H Giles a,, Samara C Petersen a, Gerald B Call b, John M Chaston a,
Editor: Julie C Dunning Hotoppc
PMCID: PMC8063652  PMID: 33888509

We present the genome sequence of a bacterial strain isolated from park25 mutants of Drosophila melanogaster as part of efforts to better understand the microbial communities in D. melanogaster. We isolated and sequenced a Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain. We present a preliminary comparative analysis with a closely related strain.

ABSTRACT

We present the genome sequence of a bacterial strain isolated from park25 mutants of Drosophila melanogaster as part of efforts to better understand the microbial communities in D. melanogaster. We isolated and sequenced a Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain. We present a preliminary comparative analysis with a closely related strain.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolates are of interest in food industry fermentation (1) and are commonly found in gut microbiomes (2). Strains have recently been investigated as a possible protection against intestinal inflammation (3). We are building a genomic resource for potential microbial interactions with Parkinson’s disease.

D. melanogaster with the park25 mutation has been used as a model of Parkinson’s disease (4). We used a laboratory stock reared on a Bloomington-style diet, with the following components per liter: 957 ml water, 11.8 g yeast, 5.9 g soy flour, 58.8 g yellow cornmeal, 35.3 ml light corn syrup, 35.3 ml molasses, 4.4 ml propionic acid, and 10 ml 10% methylparaben in 95% ethanol. We took a stock of the park25 mutant from standard rearing conditions (25°C, 12/12-h light/dark cycle, and ambient humidity) in a Glendale, AZ, laboratory and homogenized 5 whole-body flies in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); then, we dilution plated the homogenate onto modified MRS medium (5) and incubated the cultures at 30°C in an airtight CO2-flooded container for 48 h. We streaked large, flat, or wrinkled yellow colonies for isolation and sequenced portions of 16S rRNA by Sanger sequencing, using universal 27F and 1492R primers (27F, 5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′; 1492R, 5’-TACGGYTACTACCTTGTTACTT-3’). We selected one of these strains for whole-genome sequencing.

We extracted DNA from the bacterial colony using the Qiagen DNeasy PowerLyzer microbial kit. The DNA was fragmented to 500 bp using NEBNext double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) Fragmentase (M0348L) and end repaired using the NEBNext Ultra II end repair/dA-tailing module (E7546L). The fragments were ligated to Illumina sequencing adapters using the NEBNext Ultra II ligation module (E7595L) and size selected to 500 bp. The ligated target sequences were enriched with a KAPA library amplification kit (KK2621), again size selected to 500 bp, and normalized to 5 ng/μl using Qubit measurements. The library was sequenced on a partial lane of the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform using 250-bp paired-end sequencing at the BYU DNA sequencing center.

In total, 1,780,201 paired-end reads passed Illumina default quality control filtering, representing an expected sequencing depth of 350× (6). To keep the expected nucleotide coverage below 200×, we assembled the genome from the first 1 million reads that passed the default Illumina quality filter using the shell split command. The reads were assembled using Velvet 1.2.10 (7) with automatic parameter optimization. We tested assemblies every 8 bp between 25mers and 250mers and then tested every 2 bp between 137mers and 165mers. The 157mer assembly minimized the number of contigs while maximizing the N50 value and maximum contig length. We submitted this assembly to RAST (810) and GenBank, where it was analyzed by the default annotation pipelines. The final annotated genome contained 3,511,265 bp, 139 contigs, a GC content of 44.2%, an N50 value of 118,894, and 3,339 coding sequences. The annotated genome was submitted to JSpeciesWS (11) in August 2020 for a tetra correlation search. Our isolate was most similar to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain WJL (coefficient, 0.99976). All software was used with default parameters unless otherwise noted.

Strain DmPark25_157 has two phage tail proteins, a murein hydrolase precursor, and a lipoyl transferase not found in L. plantarum WJL. Contig 62 of the DmPark25_157 assembly contains a parA chromosome partitioning gene and stress-resistant genes, suggesting that this contig could be a plasmid or horizontally acquired DNA involved in stress resistance.

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JACAOJ000000000; the raw reads have been deposited under the SRA accession number SRR13060588.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Leo Pallanck for providing the flies from which this bacterium was isolated.

This work was funded by a Teaching Enhancement Grant from the College of Life Sciences at Brigham Young University to J. M. Chaston and intramural and biomedical science funding to G. B. Call from Midwestern University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Behera SS, Ray RC, Zdolec N. 2018. Lactobacillus plantarum with functional properties: an approach to increase safety and shelf-life of fermented foods. Biomed Res Int 2018:9361614. doi: 10.1155/2018/9361614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elagöz A, Abdi A, Hubert J-C, Kammerer B. 1996. Structure and organisation of the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway genes in Lactobacillus plantarum: a PCR strategy for sequencing without cloning. Gene 182:37–43. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00461-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prete R, Garcia-Gonzalez N, Di Mattia CD, Corsetti A, Battista N. 2020. Food-borne Lactiplantibacillus plantarum protect normal intestinal cells against inflammation by modulating reactive oxygen species and IL-23/IL-17 axis. Sci Rep 10:16340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73201-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aryal B, Lee Y. 2019. Disease model organism for Parkinson disease: Drosophila melanogaster. BMB Rep 52:250–258. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.4.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Newell PD, Douglas AE. 2014. Interspecies interactions determine the impact of the gut microbiota on nutrient allocation in Drosophila melanogaster. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:788–796. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02742-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seeman T. Velvet Advisor. http://dna.med.monash.edu.au/∼torsten/velvet_advisor/.
  • 7.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomason JA, III, Stevens R, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F. 2015. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. 2015. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JACAOJ000000000; the raw reads have been deposited under the SRA accession number SRR13060588.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES