Skip to main content
PMC home page
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1996 Dec 1;37(4):453–460. doi: 10.1186/BF03548085

The Influence of Tail Biting on Performance of Fattening Pigs

Effekter av svansbιtnιng för produktιviteten hos slaktsvιn

P Wallgren 1,✉, E Lindahl 1
PMCID: PMC8063993  PMID: 9050278

Abstract

In comparison to 29 non bitten animals, severe tail biting was found to decrease the daily weight gain (DWG) by 25% in 8 fattening pigs during the period of biting. However, when comparing the weight gain of the lifetime between bitten and non bitten pigs, no influence of the tail biting was found. It is of interest that severity wounded pigs were parenterally treated with prokainpenicillin G for 3 consecutive days in connection with the tail biting, which could be suggested to promote the growth by reducing the influence of infections gained by the tail biting as well as of other infections present in herds rearing conventional pigs. Despite penicillin treatment, abscesses were more frequently recorded in tail bitten pigs than in non bitten animals.

The tail biting was not equally distributed between the sexes, as barrows were more frequently bitten than gilts. Among the unbitten pigs, barrows were also found to grow faster than gilts. Indeed, when comparing tail bitten and non bitten barrows, a negative influence of tail biting on DWG was not only shown during the period of biting, but could also be monitored as a reduced DWG from that period until slaughter by 11% and during lifetime by 5% (the tail bitten gilts were too few to allow statistical calculations). These results clearly indicate that tail biting affects the growth rate of the lifetime despite penicillin treatment. However, it should be stressed that this decreased lifetime DWG may not be monitored when evaluating abattoir data because the sex distribution of the pigs may not be known in such materials.

Keywords: gender, distrubution, abscess

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Acknowledgments

We thank the farmers for letting us perform the study in the herd and Dr. Caroline Fossum for scrutinizing the manuscript. This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research.

References

  1. Are DS. Tail biting in pigs. Farm Build. Prog. 1991;105:20–23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bœkbo P, Szancer J: Strategic antibiotic (tiamulin) medication of weaners for Actinobacillus pleuropneumonia. Proc. I.P.VS. 1990, 11, (44).
  3. Caldwell JD, Underdahl NR, Young GA. Swine repopulation, III. Performance of primary SPF pigs on farms. J. Amer. vet. med. Assoc. 1961;138:141–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chambers C, Powell L, Wilson E, Green LE: A postal survey of tail-docking and tail-biting in South West England. Proc. I.P.VS. 1994, 13, (475). [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Dubey JP. Long-term persistence of Toxoplasma gondii in tissues of pigs inoculated with Toxoplasma gondii oocysts and effect of freezing on viability of tissue cysts in pork. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1988;49:910–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekkel ED, van Doorn CEA, Hessing MJC, Tielen MJM. The specific-stress-free housing system has positive effects on productivity, health and welfare of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1995;73:1544–1551. doi: 10.2527/1995.7361544x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friend TH, Knabe DA, Tankley TD. Behaviour and performance of pigs grouped by 3 different methods at weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 1983;57:1406–1411. doi: 10.2527/jas1983.5761406x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hagen O, Skuleberg A. Halesâr hos gris. (Tail injuries of pigs) Nord. Vet. Med. 1960;12:1–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansen LL, Hagelsoe AM. A general survey of environmental influence on the social hierarchy function in pigs. Acta Agr. Scand. 1980;30:388–392. doi: 10.1080/00015128009435285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harbo K, Hemmingsen L, Schmidt PE, Svendsen P, Westergaard JM. Vulnera morsa caudae suum. Nord. Vet. Med. 1966;18:441–451. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris DL, Glock RD, Dale SE, Ross RF. Efficacy of gentamycin sulfate for the treatment of swine dysentery. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1972;161:1317–1321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL. The effect of aversively handling pigs, either individually or in groups, on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991;30:61–72. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(91)90085-C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Hansen C. The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987;17:245–252. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90149-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ibayashi T, Ando N, Tanaka T, Kubo M, Yamamoto K, Shimojo T, Yamada K, Yoshioka S, Coulson A: Field studies of the effects of lincomycin feed medication for the treatment of mycoplasmal pneumonias in swine. 1990, Proc. I.P.VS. 11, 88.
  15. Jorgensen B. Epidemiologiska analyser av sygdoms-data fra svinavlens forsogsstationer. (Epidemiological analyses of disease data from pig breeding research stations in Denmark.) Dansk Vet. Tidskrift. 1987;70:209–219. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelley KW, McCloneJJ, Gaskins CT. Porcine aggression: Measurement and effects of crowding and fasting. J. Anim. Sci. 1980;50:336–341. doi: 10.2527/jas1980.502336x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lund A, Wallgren P, Rundgren M, Artursson K, Thomke S, Fossum C. Performance, behaviour and immune capacity of domestic pigs reared for slaughter as siblings or transported and reared in mixed groups. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lundeheim N. Health disorders and growth performance at a Swedish pig progeny testing station. Acta Agr. Scand. 1988;38:77–88. doi: 10.1080/00015128809436590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lundeheim N, Johansson NK, Andersson K. Estimated phenotypic and genetic parameters based on data from the Swedish pig progeny testing stations. Acta Agr. Scand. 1980;30:183–188. doi: 10.1080/00015128009435263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pejsak Z, Hogg A, Foreman K, Wasinska B: The effect of Terramycin/LA in combination with Bordetella/Pasteurella vaccine in controlling athrophic rhinitis in swine. Proc. I.P.VS. 1990, 11, (76).
  21. Penny RHC, Hill FWG. Observations of some conditions in pig at the abattoir with particular reference to tail biting. Vet. Rec. 1974;94:174–180. doi: 10.1136/vr.94.9.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rasmussen OG, Banks EM, Berry TH, Becker DE. Social dominance in gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 1962;21:520–522. doi: 10.2527/jas1962.213520x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schimmel D, Blaha T, Erler W, Fuldner M, Burch DGS: Combined usage of tiamulin with Pasteurella and Bordetella vaccine against respiratory diseases in a large herd with 7500 breeding sows. Proc. I.P.VS. 1990 11, 97.
  24. Svendsen J, Olsson A-C, RantzerD Productivity and the occurence of disease through to slaughter in pigs with and without reduced vitality or physical handicap at birth. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept of Farm Buildings, Div. of Planning and environments. Report No. 1988;62:1–51. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sällvik K, Walberg K. The effects of air velocity and temperature on the behaviour and growth of pigs. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 1984;30:305–312. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8634(84)80031-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Visnjakow JI, Georgiev M, Vishnyakov YI. Swine caudophagy, a new epizootiological link of trichinellosis in the industrial swine farms. Acta Par. Pol. 1972;20:597–604. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wallgren P: The importance of diseases for daily growth in pigs. Proc. Nord. Vet. Congr. 1994, XVIIII. 106–110.
  28. Young GA, Underdahl NR, Sumpton LJ, Peo ER, Olsen LS, Kelley GW, Caldwell JD, Adams CH. Swine repopulation I. Performance within a “disease-free” experiment station herd. J. Amer. vet. med. Assoc. 1959;134:491–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES