Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1996 Dec 1;37(4):471–480. doi: 10.1186/BF03548087

The First Salmonella Enteritidis Phage Type 1 Infection of a Commercial Layer Flock in Finland

Den första Salmonella Enterιtιdιs fagityp 1 ιnfektιonen i ett kommersiellt äggproducerande hönshus ι Fιnland

T M-L Johansson 111, R Schildt 211, S Ali-Yrkkö 311, A Siitonen 411, R L Maijala 511,✉
PMCID: PMC8064013  PMID: 9050280

Abstract

The first Salmonella Enteritidis phage type (PT) 1 infection in a commercial layer flock of 2700 birds in Finland occurred in 1995. All the birds were ordered to be killed, the eggs to be destroyed and access to the layer house was denied in order to prevent spread of the infection. Ninety one commercial layers, 61 replacement pullets and 1062 eggs were collected for the analyses. The total infection level of the flock was 8%, concentrated on the 2 older age groups. S. Enteritidis PT1 was isolated from livers (5%), ovaries (2%) and from caeca (3%), of which 2 positive samples were detected with pre-enrichment and 3 without pre-enrichment by cultivation Rambach agar. Eight % of 105 pooled egg samples were positive, of which 2 were detected only from contents and 3 only from shells indicating both oviductal and faecal contamination routes of eggs. The results support the use of the extended sampling procedure in poultry flocks suspected of human food-borne Salmonella outbreaks of invasive serotypes, including not only faecal but also environmental, organ, blood and/or egg samples.

Keywords: caeca, livers, ovaries, eggs

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank DVM Matti Salmela for his participation in the practical work. The technical assistance of the laboratory personnel of the Departments of Pathology and Field Extension, Bacteriology, Food Microbiology and Turku Regional Laboratory is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Anonymous . Salmonella bacteria. Detection in Foods. 1991. Nordic Committee on Food Analysis (NMKL) p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Garrick RC, Smith AD. Evaluation of Rambach agar for the differentiation of species from other Enterobacteriaceae. Letters Appl. Microbiol. 1994;18:187–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00842.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gast RK. Recovery of Salmonella enteritidis from inoculated pools of egg contents. J. Food Protect. 1993;56:21–24. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-56.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gast RK. Understanding Salmonella enteritidis in laying chickens: the contributions of experimental infections. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994;21:107–116. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansenson LB, Kaftyreva L, Laszlo VG, Woitenkova E, Nesterova M. Epidemiological and microbiological data on Salmonella enteritidis. Acta Microbiologica Hungarica. 1992;39:31–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirn J, Nurmi E, Johansson T, Nuotio L. Long-term experience with competitive exclusion and salmonellas in Finland. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1992;15:281–285. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(92)90059-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hopper SA, Mawer S. Salmonella enteritidis in a commercial layer flock. Vet. Rec. 1988;123:351. doi: 10.1136/vr.123.13.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Humphrey TJ. Contamination of egg shell and contents with Salmonella enteritidis: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994;21:31–40. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90197-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Humphrey TJ, Baskerville A, Chart H, Rowe B. Infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis PT4 by oral challenge. Vet. Rec. 1989;125:531–532. doi: 10.1136/vr.125.21.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Humphrey TJ, Baskerville A, Mawer S, Rowe B, Hopper S. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 from the contents of intact eggs: A study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiol. Infect. 1989;103:415–423. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800030818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Humphrey TJ, Chart H, Baskerville A, Rowe B. The influence of age on the response of SFP hens to infection with Salmonella enteritidis PT4. Epidemiol. Infect. 1991;106:33–43. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800056429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Humphrey TJ, Whitehead A. Egg age and the growth of Salmonella enteritidis PT4 in egg contents. Epidemiol. Infect. 1993;111:209–219. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800056910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Humphrey TJ, Whitehead A, GawlerAHL, Henley A, Rowe B. Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens’ eggs. Epidemiol. Infect. 1991;106:489–496. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800067546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johansson T, Hirn J: Comparison of DNA-hybridization, ELISA and culturing methods for detection of Salmonella and Listeria in deep-frozen broiler carcasses. In: Schwarzwer Chr, Mulder RWAW, (eds.): Proceedings 6’th meeting on Detection Methods and Sampling Plans for Pathogens in Poultry. Grub: FLAIR No. 6/COST No. 106, 1992, 71–78.
  15. Khakhria R, Duck D, Lior H. Distribution of Salmonella enteritidis phage type in Canada. Epidemiol. Infect. 1991;106:25–32. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800056417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Manafi M, Sommer R. Comparison of 3 rapid screening methods for Salmonella spp.: ‘MUCAP Test, MicroScreen® Latex and Rambach agar’, Letters Appl. Microbiol. 1992;14:163–166. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mason J. Salmonella enteritidis control programs in the United States. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994;21:155–169. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90208-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moats WA. Egg washing - A review. J. Food Prot. 1978;41:919–925. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-41.11.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Önöz E, Hoffman K. Erfahrungen mit einem neuen Nährboden fyr die Salmonella-Diagnostik. (Experience with a new culture medium for Salmonella diagnosis). Zbi. Bakt. Hyg. I. Abt. Orig. A. 1978;240:16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poppe C. Salmonella enteritidis in Canada. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994;27:1–5. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodrigue DC, Tauxe RV, Rowe B. International increase of Salmonella enteritidis: A new pandemic? Epidemiol. Infect. 1990;105:21–27. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800047609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schoeni JL, Glass KA, McDermott JL, Wong CL. Growth and penetration of Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella heidelberg and Salmonella typhimurium in eggs. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995;24:385–396. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shivaprasad HL, Timoney JF, Morales S, Lucio B, Baker RC. Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in laying chickens. I. Studies on egg transmission, clinical signs, fecal shedding and serological responses. Avian Dis. 1990;34:548–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ward LR, de Sa JDH, Rowe B. A phage-typing scheme for Salmonella enteritidis. Epidemiol. Infect. 1987;99:291–294. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800067765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wray C, Davies RH. World Health Organization. Guidlines on Detection and monitoring of Salmonella infected poultry flocks with particular reference to Salmonella enteritidis. Report of a WHO Consultation on Strategies for Detection and Monitoring of Salmonella infected Poultry Flocks. 1994. Bacteriological techniques; pp. 34–46. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES