Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jun 5;29(8):104952. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104952

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Severe Pre-stroke Disability

Sanjana Salwi 1,*, Shawna Cutting 2,*, Alan D Salgado 3, Kiersten Espaillat 3, Matthew R Fusco 4, Michael T Froehler 5, Rohan V Chitale 4, Howard Kirshner 3, Matthew Schrag 3, Adam Jasne 6, Tina Burton 2, Brian Mac Grory 2, Ali Saad 2, Mahesh V Jayaraman 2, Tracy E Madsen 2, Katarina Dakay 2, Ryan McTaggart 2, Shadi Yaghi 7, Pooja Khatri 8, Akshitkumar M Mistry 4, Eva A Mistry 3
PMCID: PMC8064400  NIHMSID: NIHMS1595269  PMID: 32689611

Abstract

Frequency and outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in clinical practice for patients with severe pre-stroke disability are largely unknown. In this case series, we aim to describe the disability make-up and outcomes of 33 patients with severe pre-stroke disability undergoing MT. Patients with a permanent, severe, pre-stroke disability (modified Rankin Score, mRS, 4–5) were identified from a prospectively-maintained database of consecutive, MT-treated, acute ischemic anterior circulation stroke patients at two comprehensive stroke centers in the United States. We present details on the cause of disability and socio-demographic status as well as procedural and functional outcomes. This study, despite the lack of inferential testing due to limited sample size, provides insight into demographics and outcomes of MT-treated patients with severe pre-stroke disability. Rate of return to functional baseline as well as rates of procedural success and complications were comparable to that reported in the literature for patients without any pre-existing disability.

Keywords: All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke, Infarction, Acute Ischemic Stroke, Mechanical Thrombectomy, Disability

INTRODUCTION

We recently reported that outcomes of patients with moderate pre-stroke disability (pre-stroke modified Rankin scale score, mRS, 2–3), representing nearly 1/3rd of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) treated patients in practice, are comparable to those without pre-stroke disability.(1) Patients with severe pre-stroke disability (mRS 4–5), 6–7% of acute stroke patients,(2, 3) are often excluded from MT due to anticipated treatment futility and are majorly understudied. In this case series, we reveal make-up and outcomes of severely disabled patients treated with MT.

METHODS

We identified patients with permanent, severe, pre-stroke disability (mRS 4–5) in a prospectively-maintained database of consecutive MT patients at two comprehensive stroke centers in the United States. Primary outcome was the rate of return to pre-stroke functional baseline. The causes of permanent pre-stroke disability were categorized as: orthopedic, prior stroke, other neurological causes, frailty(4), obesity, trauma, and cardiac.

RESULTS

Of the 822 MT-treated patients with anterior circulation strokes, 33 had a permanent, severe pre-stroke disability. The baseline demographics, stroke characteristics, description of prior living situation, category of disability, and percent returning to pre-stroke disability level are presented (Table 1). Twelve patients (36.4%) returned to pre-stroke baseline status. 14 patients (42.4 %) were transitioned to comfort measures only. Eight patients (24.2%) died in-hospital. 28 patients (84.8%) had a successful recanalization and 6.2% had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics of 33 patients with severe pre-stroke disability (mRS 4–5)

Age, year, median [IQR] 75 [65, 84]
Males, n (%) 11 (33.3)
Hypertension, n (%) 27 (81.8)
Diabetes, n (%) 15 (45.5)
Atrial Fibrillation, n (%) 19 (57.6)
Antiplatelet use, n (%) 19 (57.6)
Anticoagulant use, n (%) 7 (21.2)
Dementia, n (%) 11 (33.3)
Prior Stroke, n (%) 11 (33.3)
Initial blood glucose, mg/dL, median [IQR] 114 [102, 140]
NIHSS, median [IQR] 19.00 [16, 25]
ASPECTS, median [IQR] 9 [7, 10]
Internal carotid artery occlusion 8 (24.2)
Middle cerebral artery (first segment) occlusion 20 (60.6)
Middle cerebral artery (second segment) occlusion 5 (15.2)
Successful Recanalization (mTICI = 2b, 3), n (%) 28 (84.8)
Time from symptom onset to recanalization, minutes, median [IQR] 344 [221, 488]
Received IV tPA, n (%) 8 (24.2)
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage, n (%) 2 (6.2)
Pre-Stroke Living Situation, n (%)
Home 20 (60.6)
Inpatient Rehabilitation 1 (3.0)
Skilled Nursing Facility 12 (36.4)
Cause of Pre-stroke Disability, n (%)
Orthopedic 11 (33.3)
Prior Stroke 5 (15.2)
Other Neurologic 6 (18.2)
Frailty 5 (15.2)
Obesity 3 (9.1)
Trauma 2 (6.1)
Cardiac 1 (3.0)
Returned to Baseline by Cause of Pre-stroke Disability, n (%)
Orthopedic 3 (27.3)
Prior Stroke 2 (40)
Other Neurologic 1 (16.7)
Frailty 2 (40)
Obesity 2 (66.7)
Trauma 2 (100)
Cardiac 0
Total 12 (36.4)

NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ASPECT: Alberta Stroke Program Early CT; mTICI: Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia Score.

DISCUSSION

Our study provides an understanding of disability make-up, procedural, and functional outcomes of patients with severe, permanent pre-stroke disability after MT. We found that 33/822 (4%) patients undergoing MT for anterior circulation stroke had a pre-procedure permanent severe disability. Majority (60%) of the patients resided at home prior to the presentation. Although the procedural outcomes (84% successful recanalization and 6.2% rate of sICH) and rate of return to the baseline functional status (36%) was comparable to that reported in the literature for patients with no pre-stroke disability, no definite inferential testing can be done due to a limited number of patients.(5, 6) However, these data may provide some reassurance that MT in severely and permanently disabled patients is not exceedingly rare. This study builds on prior work(79) and suggests that in the acute presentation of stroke, when there is uncertainty about permanence and degree of disability, MT can still be considered as a treatment option. This study likely suffers from a selection bias towards MT on only those severely disabled patients that were initially perceived to have good outcomes by treating clinicians.

Acknowledgments

FUNDING

Dr. E. Mistry reports grant funding from NIH/NINDS (K23NS113858).

Study Funding: None

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES

Dr. Froehler serves as a consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, Cerenovus, Corindus, Genentech, Balt, and Viz.ai; and receives grant funding from Stryker, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Genentech, and EndoPhys. Dr. Chitale receives modest research funding from Cerenovus and Medtronic. Dr. Madsen has modest funding from NHLBI. Dr. Khatri reports payments to her department from Genentech and Lumosa, and grants from Cerenovus and Nervive. Ms. Salwi and Espaillat have no disclosures. Drs. Cutting, Salgado, Fusco, Kirshner, Schrag, Jasne, Burton, MacGrory, Saad, Jayaraman, Madsen, Dakay, McTaggart, Yaghi, and A. Mistry have no disclosures.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Salwi S, Cutting S, Salgado AD, et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Ischemic StrokePatients with Pre-stroke Disability. Stroke;In Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dallas MI, Rone-adams S, Echternach JL, et al. Dependence in Prestroke Mobility Predicts Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2008:2298–2303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Quinn TJ, Taylor-Rowan M, Coyte A, et al. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale: Evaluation of validity, prognostic accuracy, and association with treatment. Frontiers in Neurology 2017;8:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xue Q-L. The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin Geriatr Med 2011;27:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goldhoorn R-JB, Verhagen M, Dippel DWJ, et al. Safety and Outcome of Endovascular Treatment in Prestroke-Dependent Patients. Stroke 2018;49:2406–2414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goyal M, Menon BK, Zwam WHV, et al. Endovascular Thrombectomy after Large-Vessel Ischaemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Five Randomised Trials. Lancet 2016:1723–1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leker RR, Gavriliuc P, Yaghmour NE, et al. Increased Risk for Unfavorable Outcomein Patients with Pre-Existing Disability Undergoing Endovascular Therapy. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association 2018;27:92–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Slawski DE, Salahuddin H, Shawver J, et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Elderly Stroke Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Baseline Disability. Interventional neurology 2018;7:246–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seker F, Pfaff J, Schonenberger S, et al. Clinical Outcome after Thrombectomy in Patients with Stroke with Premorbid Modified Rankin Scale Scores of 3 and 4: A Cohort Study with 136 Patients. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 2019;40:283–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES