Abstract
UV-C exposure has become a crucial risk for living organisms due to its widespread use in sterilization. In this study, the mitigating potential of lycopene was investigated against UV-C-mediated toxicity in Allium cepa L. roots. Allium bulbs were separated into six groups which treated with tap water, 215 mg/L lycopene, 430 mg/L lycopene, 254-nm UV radiation, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation, and 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. Germination percentage, root length, weight gain, mitotic index, micronucleus frequency, and other chromosomal aberrations as well as meristematic cell damages were investigated in all groups. Malondialdehyde level and the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzymes were also analyzed to understand the severity of oxidative stress. UV-C radiation was revealed to negatively affect all parameters investigated, while the mitigating activities of lycopene against UV-C-mediated toxicity were dose-dependent. Therefore, the study evidently demonstrated the promising potential of lycopene in the protection against the detrimental effects of UV-C exposure in A. cepa.
Keywords: Allium cepa, Genotoxicity, Lycopene, Meristematic cell damages, Oxidative stress, UV radiation
Introduction
The thinning of the ozone layer in the stratosphere causes a large increase in ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the earth’s surface (Bernhard et al. 2020). Sunlight consist of three types of UV radiation including UV-A (315–400-nm wavelength), UV-B (280–315-nm wavelength), and UV-C (200–280-nm wavelength). UV is a carcinogen with well-known genotoxic and mutagenic effects (Szoltysek et al. 2017). DNA damage arising from UV irradiation may occur due to the direct and indirect effects of UV. Direct damage is related to covalent modification of neighboring pyrimidines, whereas indirect damage is related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation (Yu and Lee 2017). The detrimental effect of UV-A on DNA is due to indirect damage associated with excessive ROS production. On the other hand, UV-B and UV-C cause direct damage to cellular DNA by forming photodimers in di-pyrimidine regions (Mullenders 2018). It has also been shown that UV-C light stimulates ROS formation, which has the potential to directly damage DNA and other macromolecules (Szoltysek et al. 2017). Although UV irradiation seems to be a panacea, especially in sterilization, cancer therapy, and food preservation studies, different types of UV radiation have substantial disadvantages. Because UV-A induce sub-lethal damages rather than killing cells, it has a lower germicidal activity than UV-B and UV-C (Jeon and Ha 2018). Unlike UV-A and UV-B, surfaces must be cleaned of visible organic contamination prior to UV-C disinfection, as UV-C has poor penetrability due to its high absorption potential by organic materials (Andersen et al. 2006). In addition, the necessity of placing the UV-C unit very close to the target during food preservation processes was also considered as a disadvantage (Guerrero-Beltrán and Barbosa-Cánovas 2004). Although the vast majority of UV-C is absorbed by the ozone layer, humans are exposed to this type of radiation from artificial sources such as fluorescent lamps, light-emitting diodes, and mercury vapor lamps (Kaidzu et al. 2019). Microorganisms and plants are severely damaged by UV-C. Because the wavelength of 254 nm is extremely close to the peak of DNA absorption (253.7 nm) and microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, and spores can be successfully eliminated at this wavelength, 254-nm wavelength of UV-C radiation is frequently used in sterilization applications (Coohill and Sagripanti 2008; Lindblad et al. 2020). It is also known that low-dose UV-C application increases the shelf life of fruits and vegetables by causing stress and stress-induced antioxidant metabolite synthesis in plants (Park and Kim 2015). Despite its important uses, UV-C radiation is cytotoxic, harmful to the human cornea, and promoting malignant tumor formation (Kaidzu et al. 2019; Fukui et al. 2020).
Lycopene (C40H56) is a highly unsaturated carotenoid compound mostly found in reddish- and orange-colored fruits and vegetables (Yin et al. 2019). The inability of the human body to synthesize lycopene makes it necessary to take lycopene from the diet. Tomato, watermelon, red oranges, pink grapefruits, carrot, pomegranate, red grapes, and papaya as well as tomato-derived foods such as soup, sauces, tomato juice, and ketchup are the major sources of dietary lycopene intake (Bramley 2000; Kong et al. 2010; Imran et al. 2020). As a strong antioxidant phytochemical, it deactivates ROS effectively (Imran et al. 2020). It should be noted that the highest antioxidant power among carotenoid pigments belongs to lycopene. Indeed, lycopene has proven to be a marvelous nutraceutical which has positive effects in cancer, cardiovascular diseases, infertility, liver dysfunctions, and metabolic syndrome (Grabowska et al. 2019; Caseiro et al. 2020).
Plant-based systems, including Allium cepa L. assay, have been widely used in determining the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity from a variety of contaminants and other risk factors, as well as evaluating the preventive potential of natural products (Roy et al. 2019; Macar et al. 2020). Thanks to its vulnerable roots with highly active meristematic activity, A. cepa provides a practical, inexpensive, and sensitive assessment method exhibiting perfect compatibility with other test systems including rodents (Srivastava and Singh 2020).
Especially with the COVID-19 pandemic, the increased use of UV-C radiation in decontamination and sterilization studies makes it necessary to identify functional foods that are protective against UV-C exposure-related health problems. Therefore, the present study was aimed to evaluate the preventive potential of lycopene against the damages caused by 254-nm UV-C radiation via a model organism, A. cepa. Besides genotoxicity parameters (mitotic index (MI), micronucleus (MN) formation, and chromosomal aberrations (CAs)), some physiological (germination percentage, root length, and weight gain) and biochemical parameters (malondialdehyde (MDA) content and the total activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) enzymes) were monitored in order to present a comprehensive research. The meristematic cell damages caused by UV-C administration and the mitigating effect of lycopene on these damages were also investigated.
Materials and methods
Design of the experiment
Equal-sized (4.97–5.15 g) A. cepa bulbs were purchased from local markets in Isparta, Turkey. Bulbs were thoroughly washed under tap water, and then dry roots and outer scales were taken away. Six groups of 50 individuals each were formed with the peeled bulbs. The first group (G1) was considered as control and soaked in a glass beaker filled with tap water throughout the experimental period. The other groups were treated with 215 mg/L lycopene (G2), 430 mg/L lycopene (G3), 254-nm UV radiation (G4), 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation (G5), and 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation (G6) for 3 days at room temperature. Lycopene solutions were prepared using Sepe Natural Lycopene Extract (90 capsule × 430 mg) (Sepe Natural Organic Products San. ve Tic. A.Ş., İzmir, Turkey). Capsules enclosed with edible bovine serum gelatin were filled with lycopene extract obtained from Solanum lycopersicum and Ginkgo biloba leaf powders. Administration of 254-nm radiation to the UV-treated groups (groups 4, 5, and 6) was performed using a hand-held UV lamp (Model UVGL-58, Mineralite, UVP, Upland, CA, USA) for 3 days. UV-C radiation was applied to the beakers containing the bulbs from a distance of 20 cm from the top. During the UV application, bulbs in group 4 were in contact with tap water, and bulbs in groups 5 and 6 were in contact with 215 mg/L lycopene and 430 mg/L lycopene solutions, respectively.
Assessment of growth levels
When the experimental period was over, germination was monitored considering the emergence of the new roots from the disc stem of each bulb. Germination percentage (%) was calculated using the formula (Eq. 1) (Atik et al. 2007).
GP (%) = (Number of the germinated bulbs/Total number of the bulbs) × 100 (1)
Lengths of the new roots (cm) were measured with a ruler from basis to tips at the end of the treatments. Pre-application and post-application weights of bulbs (g) were noted to determine the effects of the treatments on growth. The difference between final weight and initial weight was recorded as weight gain (cm).
Assessment of genotoxicity parameters
At the end of the experimental process, 0.5–1-cm-long root segments were cut from the end of the roots and pre-treated with saturated para-dichlorobenzene solution for 4 h. Root tips were then transferred into acetic-alcohol (1: 3) solution for fixation for 24 h. Samples were stored at + 4 °C in 70% alcohol until the analysis began (Hill and Myers 1945). Hydrolysis of the tissues was achieved by keeping the roots in 1 N HCl in a hot water bath set at 60 °C for 17 min. Root tips were then thoroughly washed with tap water and kept in Feulgen stain for 1–1.5 h for staining. Following the staining process, the root tips were washed with tap water once again for 15 min. One drop of acetic acid was used before squashing the roots to prepare the microscopic slides (Sharma and Gupta 1982). Slides were screened (500X) to evaluate MI and the frequency of CAs and MN under a microscope (Olympus CX41) and photographed using a camera (Olympus C-5060). One hundred cells from each root tip and totally 1000 cells from each group were scored for MN and CAs frequencies. MN bodies were identified according to the criteria suggested by Fenech et al. (2003). On the other hand, MI was analyzed considering 1000 cells from each root tip and totally 10,000 cells from each group. MI was scored by proportioning the number of cells that underwent mitosis to the total number of dividing and non-dividing cells.
Assessment of biochemical parameters
The total activities of SOD ([EC 1.15.1.1]) and CAT ([EC 1.11.1.6]) enzymes as well as MDA content were evaluated after the treatments were ended.
MDA, a decisive marker of oxidative stress-related membrane damages, was evaluated according to Heath and Packer (1968). For MDA analysis, 0.1 g of root segments was ground and homogenized using 2 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). After a 15-min centrifugation process at 12,000 rpm, supernatant fraction of the samples (1 mL) was mixed with an equal amount of 0.5% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 20% TCA. All processes were carried out at 25 °C. Sample mixtures were exposed to 95 °C temperature for 25 min utilizing a hot water bath. Ice bath was used to terminate the reactions. The samples were kept in the ice bath for 10 min to cool completely. Following a 5-min centrifugation process at 10,000 rpm, absorbance of the supernatant collected from the samples at 532 nm and 600 nm were recorded using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Mini-1240 / UV–Vis spectrophotometer). The absorbance at 600 nm was utilized to distinguish the non-specific turbidity. MDA contents of the samples were calculated as micromolars per gram of fresh weight (extinction coefficient 155 mM.cm−1).
Extraction process of the enzymes (SOD and CAT) was carried out using the same method (Zou et al. 2012). 0.5 g of root segment was transferred to an ice-cold mortar containing 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer with pH 7.5 after pre-treatment in liquid nitrogen for 30 s. Twenty-minute centrifugation at 14,000 rpm at +4 °C was applied to separate the supernatant fraction of homogenates.
The total activities of SOD and CAT enzymes were evaluated using the methods of Beauchamp and Fridovich (1971) and Zhang et al. (2005), respectively. A mixture consisting of 0.01 mL of supernatant, 1.5 mL of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer with pH 7.8, 0.28 mL of distilled water, 0.3 mL of 20 μM riboflavin, 0.3 mL of 130 mM methionine, 0.3 mL of 750 μM nitro blue tetrazolium chloride, 0.3 mL of 0.1 mM EDTA-Na2, and 0.01 mL of 4% polyvinylpyrrolidone was prepared in a spectrophotometer cuvette and allowed to react for 15 min under 375 μmol m−2 s−1 fluorescent light to assess the total SOD activity. The absorbance of the mixture at 560-nm wavelength recorded by a Shimadzu Mini-1240/UV–Vis spectrophotometer was utilized to calculate the total SOD activity of the samples (unit mg −1 fresh weight).
A mixture consisting of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer with pH 7.8, distilled water and 0.1 M hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was prepared in a spectrophotometer cuvette to assess the total CAT activity. Enzymatic reaction was allowed to run by adding the 0.2 mL supernatant to the mixture and was monitored by the decrease in absorbance measured at 240-nm wavelength (Shimadzu Mini-1240/UV–Vis spectrophotometer). The total enzymatic activity of CAT enzyme was calculated as OD240nm min g−1 fresh weight.
Assessment of meristematic cell damages
Freshly prepared cross-section of the decapitated root segments was stained with 1 drop of methylene blue (1%) to determine the damage level of meristematic cell. A steel scalpel was used to take the cross sections. Slides were screened under a ×500 magnification of a microscope (Olympus CX41) and photographed using a camera (Olympus C-5060). At the end of the examination, meristematic injuries were classified according to their intensity.
Statistical analysis
Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation in the tables. The means of the data were compared in terms of statistical differences using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s tests (p <0.05). SPSS 23 software was used to carry out statistical analysis.
Results and discussion
Potential effects of UV-C and lycopene on physiological parameters were evaluated considering germination, root elongation, and weight increase of the bulbs (Table 1). While the lycopene-treated groups (G2 and G3) showed 100% germination success as the control group (G1), the germination percentage of G4 treated with UV-C radiation was determined as 63%. Low-dose lycopene applied with UV-C led to an increase in the germination percentage in G5. The raise in the germination rate in G6 was greater than in G5. Similar to the germination percentage results, both the root elongation and the weight gain values in G2 and G3 treated with lycopene solutions were not statistically different from G1. UV-C treatment triggered a stunning reduction in the root elongation rate in G4 compared to G1. Similarly, the weight gain in the group exposed to UV radiation (G4) also drastically declined. On the other hand, the elongation rate of the root and the weight gain of the bulbs in UV-C-exposed groups (G5 and G6) showed a gradual increase with increasing lycopene doses. Lycopene-treated G2 and G3 groups, which achieved similar results to the control, indicated that lycopene administration had no side effects on growth. Various studies on higher plants have shown that excessive UV radiation causes different morphological and physiological responses (Golob et al. 2017; Verdaguer et al. 2017; Yadav et al. 2020; Forges et al. 2020). Neelamegam and Sutha (2015) reported that UV-C irradiation treatment had no detrimental effect on seed germination and seedling growth of Arachis hypogaea. On the other hand, similar to our results, Seven et al. (2015) revealed that 260-nm UV-C radiation administration resulted in a remarkable decrease in germination percentage, weight gain, and root length in A. cepa. According to Darras et al. (2020), while low doses of UV-C radiation cause positive physiochemical changes in the plant, high doses of UV-C exposure cause many growth-restricting changes such as the destruction of photosynthetic pigments and photosystem II damage. Lycopene reduced UV-mediated growth arrest in a dose-dependent manner. According to Ascenso et al. (2016), lycopene is the fastest-depleting antioxidant in human skin through UV irradiation and may therefore play an effective protective function against UV. The mitigating effect of lycopene on the growth of UV-exposed Allium may be explain on the basis of the investigation of Fazekas et al. (2003) who reported that lycopene had a promising potential in maintaining normal cell proliferation against UV-induced photodamages.
Table 1.
Effects of UV-C and lycopene on physiological parameters
Groups* | Germination percentage (%) (n=50) | Root length (cm) (n=10) | Weight gain (g) (n=10) |
---|---|---|---|
G1 | 100 | 6.74±1.28a | +4.50a (5.00±1.46–9.50±2.68) |
G2 | 100 | 6.80±1.30a | +4.62a (5.12±1.48–9.74±2.71) |
G3 | 100 | 6.86±1.32a | +4.70a (4.97±1.42–9.67±2.66) |
G4 | 63 | 0.75±0.46d | +0.63d (5.15±1.50–5.78±1.60) |
G5 | 71 | 1.60±0.88c | +1.53c (5.10±1.46–6.63±1.69) |
G6 | 80 | 3.90±1.13b | +2.84b (4.99±1.44–7.83±2.15) |
*G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. The means shown with different letters (a–d) in the same column were considered as significant at p <0.05
As reflected in Table 2, there was no significant difference between the lycopene-treated groups (G2 and G3) and the control group (G1) with regard to the genotoxicity parameters. Therefore, it may be suggested that lycopene did not trigger any genotoxicity when administered alone. Our results were in accordance with Ascenso (2012) who reported that pure crystalline and formulated lycopene did not have any genotoxic potential. In addition to not being genotoxic itself, lycopene lessens the genotoxicity of many genotoxins (Fernández-Bedmar et al. 2018). On the other hand, while 254-nm UV radiation caused a significant decrease in MI level, it induced a notable increase in both MN and other CAs in G4. UV-C administration induced various CAs in different phases of cell mitosis in G4 such as MN, fragment, vagrant chromosome, sticky chromosome, bridge, unequal distribution of chromatin, multipolar anaphase, and vacuole nucleus (Fig. 1, Table 2). MN is a small body containing extranuclear chromatin, surrounded by a nuclear membrane. It could be described as an apparent harbinger of genotoxic agents around. MN frequency in UV-exposed G4 was nearly 79-fold of the control group (Fig. 1a). On the other hand, the sharp increase in the frequency of MN, induced by 254 nm UV, gradually decreased with increasing doses of lycopene. Indeed, MN levels in G5 and G6 treated with lycopene were nearly 65 and 55 times that of the control group, respectively. Our results were consistent with other studies showing that UV-C irradiation clearly induces MN formation (Haaf et al. 1999; Terradas et al. 2012; Seven et al. 2015). According to Hintzsche et al. (2017), acentric fragments as well as entire chromosomes those lagged behind in anaphase and not included into daughter nuclei at telophase are the major reasons of MN formation in dividing cells. Clastogenic factors mainly lead to a rise in the fragment formation which in turn resulted in not correctly distributed chromatins to daughter nuclei and remains as MN in the cytoplasm. Confirming this, in our study, the most common CAs following MN formation was fragment (Fig. 1b). Fragment formation is an alert for broken DNA in cells. Khlebova et al. (2020) reported that ionizing radiation is an inducer for fragmentation as well as chemical mutagens. Because of the lack of centromeres and kinetochores that allow the chromosomes to move, fragment chromosomes remain immobile and lagged during the anaphase of mitosis. Similar to MN, fragment formation in G5 and G6 gradually decreased with the increased doses of lycopene. Another chromosomal disorder contributing to genomic instability in UV-C-exposed group (G4) was vagrant chromosome which observed in telophase (Fig. 1c) and anaphase (Fig. 1d, f). Elevated vagrant level is a sign for spindle poisoning and usually occurs due to irregularities in chromosomal separation (Sivaram et al. 2020). While the frequency of vagrant in G4 increased to 48.60 ± 6.75, low-dose lycopene applied simultaneously with UV-C reduced the vagrant frequency to 40.10 ± 5.77 in G5. In addition, G6 had the least vagrant incidence (33.40±4.97) among UV-C-treated groups. Sticky chromosome was one of the most seen CAs in UV-C-treated G4 (Fig. 1e). Debnath et al. (2020) stated that cellular DNA is a conspicuous target for UV-dependent genetic impairment in plants, and stickiness may be a result of polymeric deterioration of chromosomal DNA. Likewise the above-mentioned CAs, the increase in the amount of lycopene applied simultaneously with UV-C resulted in a gradual decrease in sticky chromosome frequency in G5 and G6. Stickiness is an irreversible disorder and provokes cell death (Siddiqui and Alrumman 2020). Another frequent UV-C-induced CAs types in G4 were bridge formation (Fig. 1f) and unequal distribution of chromatin (Fig. 1g). Chromosomal bridges are usually arisen from fusion and rupture of chromosomes or chromatids (Luo et al. 2004), while unequal distribution of chromatin occurs due to the non-disjunction of chromatids in anaphase and causes a subsequent increase in vagrant frequency (Dutta et al. 2018). Oladipupo et al. (2021) showed a strong positive correlation between the frequencies of bridges and sticky chromosomes in the meristematic cells of A. cepa treated with genotoxic extract of Phaulopsis falcisepala. Two hundred fifty-four-nanometer-UV radiation triggered a stunning increase in multipolar anaphase (Fig. 1h) and vacuole nucleus (Fig. 1ı) in G4. Multipolarity in mitosis is a warning for agents malfunctioning the centrioles and spindles (Khallef et al. 2019; Khlebova et al. 2020). In addition, Sutan et al. (2014) reported that vacuole nucleus is a kind of CAs which refers to a devastating effect on DNA synthesis in the synthesis phase of the mitosis. Based on bridge, unequal distribution of chromatin, multipolarity, and vacuole nucleus frequencies, like the previously mentioned CAs, the mitigating role of lycopene administration in G5 and G6 treated with both lycopene and UV was also dose-dependent. Our results were in line with the study of Angelova et al. (2020) who showed that prolonged UV irradiation provoked an apparent increase in MN formation in Hordeum vulgare. According to the study performed by Wang and Wang (1999), UV irradiation caused high MN frequency levels in pollen mother cells of Tradescantia. Moreover, Seven et al. (2015) demonstrated that UV-C radiation induced CAs formation in A. cepa roots such as fragment, reverse polarization, stickiness in chromosomes, bridge, binucleated cell, and unequal distribution of chromatin as well as MN. However, this is the first study that revealed the vagrant-, multipolar anaphase-, and vacuole nucleus-inducing effects of UV-C radiation.
Table 2.
Protective role of lycopene against UV-C-induced genotoxicity
Aberrations | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MI | 795.60±24.30a | 812.40±27.38a | 809.64±25.77a | 428.80±14.52d | 495.30±16.78c | 554.60±18.25b |
MN | 0.54±0.72d | 0.48±0.56d | 0.28±0.36d | 42.70±5.36a | 35.20±4.74b | 29.50±4.12c |
FRG | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 60.40±7.72a | 52.10±7.13b | 44.90±6.38c |
VC | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 48.60±6.75a | 40.10±5.77b | 33.40±4.97c |
SC | 0.32±0.44d | 0.18±0.26d | 0.00±0.00d | 40.20±4.98a | 33.70±4.23b | 27.80±3.59c |
B | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 32.80±3.24a | 26.90±2.78b | 20.30±2.55c |
UDC | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 26.10±2.88a | 21.40±2.61b | 17.30±1.97c |
MA | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 19.70±1.83a | 13.80±1.54b | 8.20±1.22c |
VN | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 12.80±1.26a | 8.40±0.84b | 3.90±0.64c |
G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. The means (n=10) shown with different letters (a–d) in the same line were considered as significant at p <0.05. MI mitotic index, MN micronucleus, FRG fragment, VC vagrant chromosome, SC sticky chromosome, B bridge, UDC unequal distribution of chromatin, MA multipolar anaphase, VN vacuole nucleus
Fig. 1.
Chromosomal aberrations induced by UV-C radiation (a MN at interphase, b fragment at anaphase, c vagrant chromosome at telophase, d vagrant chromosome at anaphase, e sticky chromosome, f bridge at anaphase (dotted arrows) and vagrant chromosome (straight arrows), g unequal distribution of chromatin, h multipolar anaphase, ı vacuole nucleus)
MI, a reliable sign for a healthy mitotic activity of cells, exhibited a significant decrease in UV-C-exposed G4. On the other hand, MI level showed a significant improvement in groups treated simultaneously with UV-C and lycopene (G5 and G6) compared to G4, even if it did not rise to the control level (Table 2). Our results on MI were in line with Verdes-Teodor et al. (2019) who revealed the mito-depressive effect of UV-C in root meristems of Cucurbita pepo L.
Genotoxicity-extenuating capacity of lycopene against various genotoxins such as aflatoxins and oxygen radicals have already been reported (Fernández-Bedmar et al. 2018). Chromosomal perturbations are potential cancer-starters. Yet, antioxidant features of lycopene have been shown to be effective in suppressing the cancer insurgences (Imran et al. 2020). Sirikhet et al. (2021) suggested that lycopene has more skin-protective properties than beta carotene, as lycopene is a natural antioxidant and has UV-blocking power. According to Ascenso et al. (2016), lycopene pre-treatment seemed to correct photodamage in cells exposed to UV radiation through mitotic modifications.
In order to reveal the effect of UV radiation and lycopene on the oxidative balance of cells, membrane damage and antioxidant enzyme activities were investigated (Table 3). MDA is known to be a decisive biomarker of both redox signaling and lipid peroxidation in biological membranes (Khoubnasabjafari and Jouyban 2020). Differences in MDA levels of the first three groups (G1, G2, and G3) were not statistically significant. However, MDA amount of UV-C-treated G4 was about 3.5 times that of the control group indicating that an oxidative imbalance took place following UV exposure in A. cepa roots. Our results were in accordance with the data of Luo et al. (2019) who revealed that UV-C administration triggered a remarkable induction in MDA levels in grape leaves. Another study on Nicotiana tabacum callus showed that 254-nm UV radiation caused a remarkable increase in MDA accumulation from the 6th hour of application (Zacchini and de Agazio 2004). Lycopene decreased MDA levels in G5 and G6, depending on the dose when applied with UV-C. dos Santos et al. (2015) stated that lycopene owned a suppressive potential in the propagation stage of lipid peroxidation. In addition, lycopene was proven to reduce oxidative stress-related lipid peroxidation in bovine sperm cells (Tvrdá et al. 2016). Lycopene contributes to the protection of membrane integrity by removing the radicals such as singlet oxygen and peroxyl radicals, owing to the double bonds in its structure (Caseiro et al. 2020).
Table 3.
Effects of UV-C and lycopene on biochemical parameters
Groups* | MDA (μM g−1 FW) (n=3) |
SOD (U mg−1 FW) (n=3) |
CAT (OD240 nm min g−1 FW) (n=3) |
---|---|---|---|
G1 | 8.70±1.86d | 90.40±7.16d | 0.36±0.78d |
G2 | 8.50±1.84d | 91.50±7.24d | 0.34±0.76d |
G3 | 8.60±1.82d | 88.30±7.12d | 0.35±0.75d |
G4 | 30.40±3.27a | 248.60±15.66a | 0.96±1.16a |
G5 | 22.30±2.94b | 196.20±13.58b | 0.75±0.96b |
G6 | 14.80±2.15c | 146.90±10.75c | 0.58±0.84c |
*G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. The means shown with different letters (a–d) in the same column were considered as significant at p <0.05
Lipid peroxidation and destruction of chromosomes are among the consequences of oxidative stress arisen from over-production of ROS in cells (Xie et al. 2019). Plants are endowed with antioxidant systems to overcome the menacing accumulation of these radicals. SOD and CAT are the enzymatic antioxidants those have major roles in removing the oxidative stress by scavenging superoxide and hydrogen peroxide radicals, respectively. The total SOD and CAT activities of the G1, G2, and G3 were not statistically significant (Table 3). On the other hand, 254 nm UV initiated a sharp increase in the total activities of SOD and CAT. In G4, the total SOD and CAT activities were 2.75 and 2.67 times those of the control (G1), respectively. Our results were consistent with Zacchini and de Agazio (2004), who reported that 254-nm UV radiation led to a rise in the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including CAT. Similar to our data, Acemi et al. (2018) reported that in Amsonia orientalis, prolonged UV-C exposure resulted in significant increases in MDA level and CAT activity but delayed root growth. In pea plants, it has been shown that UV-C-induced oxidative stress causes notable increases in MDA content and the activities of SOD and CAT enzymes (Sergiev et al. 2017). In addition, UV-B radiation has been shown to induce an increase in oxidative stress mediated by the production of ROS (Ascenso et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2019). Lycopene considerably reduced the activities of SOD and CAT when applied with UV in G5 and G6 compared to G4. Grabowska et al. (2019) stated that lycopene performed wonderfully in quenching ROS to alleviate the dangers of oxidative stress, including cancer. According to Imran et al. (2020), lycopene is a miracle compound that participates in free-radical scavenging, chelating, and anti-apoptotic actions in case of oxidative imbalance in cells. There are a number of studies showing that dietary lycopene intake modifying the antioxidant enzyme activities including SOD and CAT (Jiang et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017; Uçar and Pandir 2017). However, this is the first study that revealed the mitigative potential of lycopene against UV-C-mediated oxidative attack.
Table 4 illustrates the extenuating capacity of lycopene against UV-C-induced meristematic cell damages. According to the intensity of the damages, they were classified as “no damage,” “slight damage,” “moderate damage,” and “severe damage.” Lycopene-treated G2 and G3 did not display any kind of damage in meristematic tissue, similar to the control group. In G4, UV-C-induced meristematic damages were listed as epidermis cell damage, necrosis, giant cell nucleus, cortex cell damage, and indistinct transmission tissue (Table 4, Fig. 2). Among these defects, epidermis cell damage and cortex cell damage were severe, while the others were observed at moderate levels. Modifications in UV-C-irradiated root tissues of Capsicum species has already been mentioned by Kareem et al. (2019). Zhang et al. (2020) reported that UV-B irradiation induced the death of the root tip cells in Arabidopsis. In our study, meristematic damages induced by 254-nm UV radiation point out serious risks that may result in cell death. Giant cell nucleus is a marker of damaged mitosis similar to the aberrant chromosomes. Malformation in transmission tissue could be one of the most likely causes of retardation in growth parameters due to reduced water uptake. Lycopene reduced damage levels depending on the dose when applied with UV-C. Our results were consistent with the study of Kalefetoğlu Macar et al. (2020) who reported the healing effect of lycopene on Allium roots exposed to cobalt stress. However, the present study is the first to demonstrate the reducing effect of lycopene against the disintegrating effect of UV-C on root meristematic tissues.
Table 4.
Protective role of lycopene against UV-C-induced meristematic cell damages
Groups | Damages* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECD | N | GCN | CCD | ITT | |
G1 | − | − | − | − | − |
G2 | − | − | − | − | − |
G3 | − | − | − | − | − |
G4 | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
G5 | ++ | + | + | ++ | + |
G6 | + | + | − | + | − |
G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. *ECD epidermis cell damage, N necrosis, GCN giant cell nucleus, CCD cortex cell damage, ITT indistinct transmission tissue. (−) no damage, (+) slight damage, (++) moderate damage, (+++) severe damage
Fig. 2.
Meristematic cell damages induced by UV-C administration (a normal appearance of epidermis cells, b normal appearance of cell nucleus (oval), c normal appearance of cortex cells, d normal appearance of transmission tissue, e epidermis cell damage, f necrotic areas (black arrow), giant cell nucleus (white arrow), g cortex cell damage, h indistinct appearance of transmission tissue)
Conclusion
The present study was conducted in today’s pandemic conditions where the use of UV-C radiation in sterilization is increasing. Based on the results of this study, we concluded that the deleterious effects of 254-nm UV-C radiation on A. cepa, a well-established model organism, were demonstrated by a detailed research. UV-C has been proven to be a risk factor for growth, oxidative balance, genetic stability, and meristematic cell integrity in A. cepa. The data clearly showed that UV-C was effective not only on microorganisms but also on other non-target organisms, suggesting that UV-C-based sterilization practices may also be dangerous for human health. The fact that lycopene application did not cause adverse effects was one of the important outcomes of the study. Lycopene as a cheap, reliable, and plant-based compound with no side effects had an extenuating capacity on against 254-nm UV-C radiation. According to the data of this research, lycopene supplements and lycopene-rich diet promise an extraordinary protection against health problems induced by UV-C exposure. In order to reinforce our findings, similar studies should be designed with other test systems. Biological reactions occur depending on the wavelength of UV light. For this reason, it should not be overlooked that it is extremely important to conduct similar studies with different UV types.
Authors’ contributions
Dr. Dilek Çavuşoğlu, Dr. Tuğçe Kalefetoğlu Macar, Dr. Oksal Macar, Dr. Kültiğin Çavuşoğlu, and Dr. Emine Yalçın carried out the experimental stages, manuscript preparation, and statistical analysis.
Data availability
All data and materials generated, utilized, or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors whose names appear on the submission approved the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Acemi A, Duman YA, Karakuş YY, Özen F. A preliminary investigation on developmental and biochemical responses of Amsonia orientalis to ultraviolet-C irradiation. Adv Hortic Sci. 2018;32(4):563–568. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen BM, Bånrud H, Bøe E, Bjordal O, Drangsholt F. Comparison of UV C light and chemicals for disinfection of surfaces in hospital isolation units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(7):729–734. doi: 10.1086/503643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angelova T, Tyutyundzhiev N, Angelov C, Gateva S, Jovtchev G. Induction of micronuclei after prolonged UV irradiation of Poaceae species cultivated in laboratory conditions and wild-growing in Rila Mountain. RAD Conference Proceedings. 2020;4:39–44. [Google Scholar]
- Ascenso A (2012) Carrier-mediated dermal delivery for prevention or treatment of skin disorders. Jenny Stanford Publishing
- Ascenso A, Pedrosa T, Pinho S, Pinho F, Oliveira JMP, Cabral Marques H, Oliveira H, Simões S, Santos C. The effect of lycopene preexposure on UV-B-irradiated human keratinocytes. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:8214631. doi: 10.1155/2016/8214631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atik M, Karagüzel O, Ersoy S. Sıcaklığın Dalbergia sissoo tohumlarının çimlenme özelliklerine etkisi. Mediterr Agric Sci. 2007;20(2):203–210. [Google Scholar]
- Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971;44:276–287. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernhard GH, Neale RE, Barnes PW, Neale PJ, Zepp RG, Wilson SR, Andrady AL, Bais AF, McKenzie RL, Aucamp PJ, Young PJ, Liley JB, Lucas RM, Yazar S, Rhodes LE, Byrne SN, Hollestein LM, Olsen CM, Young AR, Robson TM, Bornman JF, Jansen MAK, Robinson SA, Ballaré CL, Williamson CE, Rose KC, Banaszak AT, Häder D-P, Hylander S, Wängberg S-Å, Austin AT, Hou W-C, Paul ND, Madronich S, Sulzberger B, Solomon KR, Li H, Schikowski T, Longstreth J, Pandey KK, Heikkilä AM, White CC. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020;19(5):542–584. doi: 10.1039/d0pp90011g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bramley PM. Is lycopene beneficial to human health? Phytochemistry. 2000;54(3):233–236. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00103-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caseiro M, Ascenso A, Costa A, Creagh-Flynn J, Johnson M, Simões S. Lycopene in human health. LWT. 2020;127:109323. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Coohill TP, Sagripanti JL. Overview of the inactivation by 254 nm ultraviolet radiation of bacteria with particular relevance to biodefense. Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84(5):1084–1090. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00387.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darras AI, Tsikaloudakis G, Lycoskoufis I, Dimitriadis C, Karamousantas D. Low doses of UV-C irradiation affects growth, fruit yield and photosynthetic activity of tomato plants. Sci Hortic. 2020;267:109357. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Debnath P, Mondal A, Sen K, Mishra D, Mondal NK. Genotoxicity study of nano Al2O3, TiO2 and ZnO along with UV-B exposure: An Allium cepa root tip assay. Sci Total Environ. 2020;713:136592. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- dos Santos PP, Paese K, Guterres SS, Pohlmann AR, Costa TH, Jablonski A, Hickmann Flôres S, de Rios AO. Development of lycopene-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules: physicochemical characterization and stability study. J Nanopart Res. 2015;17(2):107. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-2917-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dutta J, Ahmad A, Singh J. Study of industrial effluents induced genotoxicity on Allium cepa L. Caryologia. 2018;71(2):139–145. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2018.1447631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fazekas Z, Gao D, Saladi RN, Lu Y, Lebwohl M, Wei H. Protective effects of lycopene against ultraviolet B-induced photodamage. Nutr Cancer. 2003;47(2):181–187. doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc4702_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fenech M, Chang WP, Kirsch-Volders M, Holland N, Bonassi S, Zeiger E. HUMN Project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. Mutat Res. 2003;534:65–75. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00249-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Bedmar Z, Anter J, Alonso Moraga Á. Anti/genotoxic, longevity inductive, cytotoxic, and clastogenic-related bioactivities of tomato and lycopene. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2018;59(5):427–437. doi: 10.1002/em.22185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forges M, Bardin M, Urban L, Aarrouf J, Charles F. Impact of UV-C radiation applied during plant growth on pre-and postharvest disease sensitivity and fruit quality of strawberry. Plant Dis. 2020;104(12):3239–3247. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0306-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukui T, Niikura T, Oda T, Kumabe Y, Ohashi H, Sasaki M, Igarashi T, Kunisada M, Yamano N, Oe K, Matsumoto T, Matsushita T, Hayashi S, Nishigori C, Kuroda R. Exploratory clinical trial on the safety and bactericidal effect of 222-nm ultraviolet C irradiation in healthy humans. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0235948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golob A, Kavčič J, Stibilj V, Gaberščik A, Vogel-Mikuš K, Germ M. The effect of selenium and UV radiation on leaf traits and biomass production in Triticum aestivum L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017;136:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grabowska M, Wawrzyniak D, Rolle K, Chomczyński P, Oziewicz S, Jurga S, Barciszewski J. Let food be your medicine: nutraceutical properties of lycopene. Food Funct. 2019;10(6):3090–3102. doi: 10.1039/C9FO00580C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero-Beltrán JA, Barbosa-Cánovas GV. Advantages and limitations on processing foods by UV light. Food Sci Technol Int. 2004;10(3):137–147. doi: 10.1177/1082013204044359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Haaf T, Raderschall E, Reddy G, Ward DC, Radding CM, Golub EI. Sequestration of mammalian Rad51-recombination protein into micronuclei. J Cell Biol. 1999;144(1):11–20. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: II. Role of electron transfer. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125(3):850–857. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90523-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill HD, Myers WM. A schedule including cold treatment to facilitate somatic chromosome counts in certain forage grasses. Stain Technol. 1945;20:89–92. doi: 10.3109/10520294509107138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hintzsche H, Hemmann U, Poth A, Utesch D, Lott J, Stopper H. Fate of micronuclei and micronucleated cells. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2017;771:85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imran M, Ghorat F, Ul-Haq I, Ur-Rehman H, Aslam F, Heydari M, Shariati MA, Okuskhanova E, Yessimbekov Z, Thiruvengadam M, Hashempur MH, Rebezov M. Lycopene as a natural antioxidant used to prevent human health disorders. Antioxidants. 2020;9(8):706. doi: 10.3390/antiox9080706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeon MJ, Ha JW. Efficacy of UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C irradiation on inactivation of foodborne pathogens in different neutralizing buffer solutions. LWT. 2018;98:591–597. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang W, Guo MH, Hai X. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of lycopene on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rat. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:10180–10188. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i46.10180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaidzu S, Sugihara K, Sasaki M, Nishiaki A, Igarashi T, Tanito M. Evaluation of acute corneal damage induced by 222-nm and 254-nm ultraviolet light in Sprague–Dawley rats. Free Radic Res. 2019;53(6):611–617. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2019.1603378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalefetoğlu Macar T, Macar O, Çavuşoğlu K. Protective role of lycopene against meristematic cell damage induced by cobalt (II) nitrate. In: Bashar I, editor. Karadeniz 3. Uluslararası Bilimler Akademisi, Türkiye: Uluslararası Uygulamalı Bilimler Kongresi Tam Metin Kitabı; 2020. pp. 209–216. [Google Scholar]
- Kareem KA, Olobatoke TJ, Rahaman AA, Mustapha OT. Mutagenic effects of ultraviolet (UV-C) irradiation on the anatomy of three species of Capsicum. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res. 2019;54(2):111–116. doi: 10.3329/bjsir.v54i2.41666. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khallef M, Benouareth DE, Konuk M, Liman R, Bouchelaghem S, Hazzem S, Kerdouci K. The effect of silver nanoparticles on the mutagenic and the genotoxic properties of the urban wastewater liquid sludges. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(18):18403–18410. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khlebova LP, Sokolova GG, Brynzova SE. Genotoxicity assessment of bottom sediments of the Chumysh River using the Allium-test. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;543(1):012023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/543/1/012023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khoubnasabjafari M, Jouyban A. Challenges on determination of malondialdehyde in plant samples. Arch Crop Sci. 2020;4(1):64–66. [Google Scholar]
- Kong KW, Khoo H-E, Prasad KN, Ismail A, Tan C-P, Rajab NF. Revealing the power of the natural red pigment lycopene. Molecules. 2010;15(2):959–987. doi: 10.3390/molecules15020959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W, Jiang B, Cao X, Xie Y, Huang T. Protective effect of lycopene on fluoride-induced ameloblasts apoptosis and dental fluorosis through oxidative stress mediated Caspase pathways. Chem Biol Interact. 2017;261:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindblad M, Tano E, Lindahl C, Huss F. Ultraviolet-C decontamination of a hospital room: amount of UV light needed. Burns. 2020;46(4):842–849. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu G, Huang Y, Reis FS, Song D, Ni H. Impact of nutritional and environmental factors on inflammation, oxidative stress, and the microbiome 2019. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:5716241. doi: 10.1155/2019/5716241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo LZ, Werner KM, Gollin SM, Saunders WS. Cigarette smoke induces anaphase bridges and genomic imbalances in normal cells. Mutat Res. 2004;554:375–385. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo YY, Li RX, Jiang QS, Bai R, Duan D. Changes in the chlorophyll content of grape leaves could provide a physiological index for responses and adaptation to UV-C radiation. Nord J Bot. 2019;37(4):e02314. doi: 10.1111/njb.02314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Macar O, Macar TK, Çavuşoğlu K, Yalçın E. Determination of protective effect of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) extract against cobalt (II) nitrate-induced toxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(32):40253–40261. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullenders LH. Solar UV damage to cellular DNA: from mechanisms to biological effects. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2018;17(12):1842–1852. doi: 10.1039/c8pp00182k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neelamegam R, Sutha T. UV-C irradiation effect on seed germination, seedling growth and productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(8):430–443. [Google Scholar]
- Oladipupo AR, Alaribe CS, Akintemi TA, Coker HA. Effect of Phaulopsis falcisepala (Acanthaceae) leaves and stems on mitotic arrest and induction of chromosomal changes in meristematic cells of Allium cepa. Prog Chem Biochem Res. 2021;4(2):134–147. [Google Scholar]
- Park MH, Kim JG. Low-dose UV-C irradiation reduces the microbial population and preserves antioxidant levels in peeled garlic (Allium sativum L.) during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2015;100:109–112. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.09.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roy B, Krishnan SP, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A. Toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles (metal/metal oxides) on plants using Allium cepa as a model system. Compr Anal Chem. 2019;84:125–143. doi: 10.1016/bs.coac.2019.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sergiev I, Todorova D, Katerova Z, Shopova E, Jankauskiene J, Jurkoniene S. Beneficial effects of auxin-like compounds on pea plants irradiated with UV-C. Genet Plant Physiol. 2017;7(3-4):135–146. [Google Scholar]
- Seven B, Çavuşoğlu K, Yalçın E, Çavuşoğlu K. Allium cepa L.(Amarylidaceae) kök ucu hücreleri üzerine ultraviyole radyasyonun fizyolojik ve genotoksik etkilerinin araştirilmasi. CFD. 2015;36(5):24–31. doi: 10.17776/csj.52512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma PC, Gupta PK. Karyotypes in some pulse crops. Nucleus. 1982;25:181–185. [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqui S, Alrumman S. Cytological changes induced by clethodim in Pisum sativum plant. Bangladesh J Bot. 2020;49(2):367–374. doi: 10.3329/bjb.v49i2.49318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sirikhet J, Chanmahasathien W, Raiwa A, Kiattisin K. Stability enhancement of lycopene in Citrullus lanatus extract via nanostructured lipid carriers. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(3):1750–1760. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sivaram AK, Panneerselvan L, Surapaneni A, Shah K, Crosbie N, Rogers Z, Lee E, Venkatraman K, Kannan K, Naidu R, Megharaj M (2020) Evaluation of cyto-genotoxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) to Allium cepa. Environ Toxicol Chem:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Srivastava AK, Singh D. Assessment of malathion toxicity on cytophysiological activity, DNA damage and antioxidant enzymes in root of Allium cepa model. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57840-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutan NA, Popescu A, Mihaescu C, Soare LC, Marinescu MV. Evaluation of cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of the fungicide Ridomil in Allium cepa L. An Stiint Univ Al I Cuza Iasi. 2014;60(1):5–12. [Google Scholar]
- Szoltysek K, Walaszczyk A, Janus P, Kimmel M, Widlak P. Irradiation with UV-C inhibits TNF-α-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway in a mechanism potentially mediated by reactive oxygen species. Genes Cells. 2017;22(1):45–58. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terradas M, Martín M, Hernández L, Tusell L, Genescà A. Nuclear envelope defects impede a proper response to micronuclear DNA lesions. Mutat Res-Fund Mol M. 2012;729(1-2):35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tvrdá E, Kováčik A, Tušimová E, Paál D, Mackovich A, Alimov J, Lukáč N. Antioxidant efficiency of lycopene on oxidative stress-induced damage in bovine spermatozoa. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016;7:50. doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0113-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uçar S, Pandir D. Furan induced ovarian damage in non-diabetic and diabetic rats and cellular protective role of lycopene. Arch Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;296:1027–1037. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4521-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verdaguer D, Jansen MA, Llorens L, Morales LO, Neugart S. UV-A radiation effects on higher plants: exploring the known unknown. Plant Sci. 2017;255:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verdes-Teodor A, Vochita G, Creanga D. On some genotoxic effects of UV-C radiation in root meristems in Cucurbita pepo L. Rom Rep Phys. 2019;71:707. [Google Scholar]
- Wang S, Wang X. The Tradescantia-micronucleus test on the genotoxicity of UV-B radiation. Mutat Res-Fund Mol M. 1999;426(2):151–153. doi: 10.1016/S0027-5107(99)00059-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X, He Z, Chen N, Tang Z, Wang Q, Cai Y (2019) The roles of environmental factors in regulation of oxidative stress in plant. BioMed Res Int 2019:9732325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Yadav A, Singh D, Lingwan M, Yadukrishnan P, Masakapalli SK, Datta S. Light signaling and UV-B-mediated plant growth regulation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020;62(9):1270–1292. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin Y, Zheng Z, Jiang Z. Effects of lycopene on metabolism of glycolipid in type 2 diabetic rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:2070–2077. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu SL, Lee SK. Ultraviolet radiation: DNA damage, repair, and human disorders. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2017;13(1):21–28. doi: 10.1007/s13273-017-0002-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zacchini M, de Agazio M. Spread of oxidative damage and antioxidative response through cell layers of tobacco callus after UV-C treatment. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004;42(5):445–450. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H, Jiang Y, He Z, Ma M. Cadmium accumulation and oxidative burst in garlic (Allium sativum) J Plant Physiol. 2005;162(9):977–984. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang P, Wang R, Wang Y, Xu J. Ultraviolet-B radiation induces cell death in root tips and reprograms metabolism in Arabidopsis. Biol Plant. 2020;64:764–772. doi: 10.32615/bp.2020.122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zou J, Yue J, Jiang W, Liu D. Effects of cadmium stress on root tip cells and some physiological indexes in Allium cepa var. agrogarum L. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot. 2012;54:129–141. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data and materials generated, utilized, or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.