Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Apr 23;11:8837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88164-0

Zinc oxide nanoparticles using plant Lawsonia inermis and their mosquitocidal, antimicrobial, anticancer applications showing moderate side effects

Pandiyan Amuthavalli 1, Jiang-Shiou Hwang 2,3,4,, Hans-Uwe Dahms 5, Lan Wang 6, Jagannathan Anitha 1, Murugan Vasanthakumaran 7, Arumugam Dhanesh Gandhi 8, Kadarkarai Murugan 1,, Jayapal Subramaniam 1, Manickam Paulpandi 1, Balamurugan Chandramohan 1, Shivangi Singh 5,9
PMCID: PMC8065047  PMID: 33893349

Abstract

Microbes or parasites spread vector-borne diseases by mosquitoes without being affected themselves. Insecticides used in vector control produce a substantial problem for human health. This study synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) using Lawsonia inermis L. and were characterized by UV–vis, FT-IR, SEM with EDX, and XRD analysis. Green synthesized ZnO NPs were highly toxic against Anopheles stephensi, whose lethal concentrations values ranged from 5.494 ppm (I instar), 6.801 ppm (II instar), 9.336 ppm (III instar), 10.736 ppm (IV instar), and 12.710 ppm (pupae) in contrast to L. inermis treatment. The predation efficiency of the teleost fish Gambusia affinis and the copepod Mesocyclops aspericornis against A. stephensi was not affected by exposure at sublethal doses of ZnO NPs. The predatory potency for G. affinis was 45 (I) and 25.83% (IV), copepod M. aspericornis was 40.66 (I) and 10.8% (IV) while in an ZnO NPs contaminated environment, the predation by the fish G. affinis was boosted to 71.33 and 34.25%, and predation of the copepod M. aspericornis was 60.35 and 16.75%, respectively. ZnO NPs inhibited the growth of several microbial pathogens including the bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis) and the fungi (Alternaria alternate and Aspergillus flavus), respectively. ZnO NPs decreased the cell viability of Hep-G2 with IC50 value of 21.63 µg/mL (R2 = 0.942; P < 0.001) while the concentration increased from 1.88 to 30 µg/mL. These outcomes support the use of L. inermis mediated ZnO NPs for mosquito control and drug development.

Subject terms: Biotechnology, Ecology, Environmental sciences, Nanoscience and technology

Introduction

Globally, mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are threatening human individual and public health as vectors of parasites and pathogens1. Mosquitoes provide a substantial threat when compared to other disease-transmitting insects as they spread disease causing pathogens. Anopheles stephensi is a vector which transmits the globally most threatful contagious disease malaria2. The most serious health problem caused by malaria affects 214 million cases in 20153,4. The appearance of multi-drug resistance of the disease causing protists belonging to Plasmodium spp. possess a major obstacle to successful chemoprophylaxis and chemotherapy of this disease5.

Then exposure to acoustic vibrations within determined frequency bands leads to dorsal tracheal trunk (DTT) wall rupture in mosquitoes, resulting in the discharge of gases into the body cavity, that block larval development, increase mortality rates or rendering adult mosquitoes flightless. Phyto-constituents that are naturally synthesized by medicinal plants can be utilized for ecofriendly applications in vector control6,7. Nanocomplexes using phyto- and microorganisms will minimize the side effects caused by synthetic drugs and also the toxicity to target organisms8 in an environmentally friendly manner9. Drug resistance provides the main drawback in executing chemotherapy in cancer10. The development of efficient versatile drugs against both mosquito-borne diseases and cancer were highlighted11.

In spite of increasing evidence for the outstanding mosquitocidal potency of phyto-synthesized nanocompounds and their toxicity against natural predators of mosquitoes, their effects have rarely been studied with respect to sub-lethal doses on predation12. Water predators, including juvenile instars of dragon flies, tadpoles, beetles, fishes, and crustaceans13. The impact of predatory animals on water bodies is important because such predators were introduced throughout many warm regions of the world for mosquito control14. Metabolites with functional groups such as carbonyl, hydroxyl and functional groups of amines, especially the OH-group of flavonoids that react with metal ions lead to a reduced size of metal ions that can be used for nanoparticle synthesis12. Zinc oxide nanoparticles can show several morphological varieties such as nanoflowers, nanosheets and even nanorods which were shown to successfully inhibit the growth and development of the bacteria Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Klebsiella pneumonia. Plant derived nanomaterials exhibit various shapes and sizes when compared to nanoparticles produced by other organisms such as algae, fungi, and bacteria13. There is no published report that evaluates zincoxide nanocomplex toxicity against the non-target predatory efficiency of Mesocyclops aspericornis. Traditional medicine records the plant Lawsonia inermis L. as a potential natural dye with numerous medicinal applications. Nanoparticles that are synthesized from the plant materials showed several applications in fields such as medicine, agriculture and the food industry14. ZnO NPs (zinc oxide nanoparticles which exhibit remarkable properties such as binding energy (large) and band gap (wide). Wahab et al.15 demonstrated applications of multi-dimensional (0D, 1D, 2D) nanostructures for the cytological evaluation of cancer cells and their bacterial responses. These were the properties which made zinc oxide nanoparticles biocompatible, safe, and non-toxic15. Zinc oxide nanoparticles are known to have different applications, such as in medical and biological industries, optoelectronics, as antiplatelet agents, anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenesis, especially as auspicious anti-cancer agents, providing catalytic and semiconductor properties16. Zincoxide nanoparticles are known to show insecticidal properties7. ZnO NPs were synthesized from L. inermis in the present study are also used to resolve the following issues: (a) the lethal effect against the A. stephensi malaria vector, to find out the larvicidal and pupicidal effect; (b) the predatory efficiency of the Gambussia affinis fishes and small crustacean Mesocyclops aspericornis against younger instars of Anopheles larvae in ZnO NPs contaminated water environments; (c) antimicrobial potential of nano-formulations against pathogenic microorganism and; (d) in-vitro cytotoxicity against the cancer Hep-G2 cells.

Materials and methods

This study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357).

Several aspects of below materials and methods are similar to and detailed by our earlier paper Jaganathan et al.17. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of international law and the IAECC of Bharathiar University (see below statement).

Anopheles stephensi cultivation

Details are provided in our earlier paper by Jaganathan et al.17 Anopheles stephensi eggs were collected from a local breeding habitat, a fresh water tank in Kalveerampalaiyam, Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu, India) and laboratory reared for egg hatching (80% relative humidity and 27 °C and a photoperiod of 14:10 h (L/D). Emerging larvae and pupae were used for toxicological testing as outlined below.

Leave collection and processing

Plant samples (Lawsonia inermis) were collected on a private farm at Maruthamalai hill, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India) with the consent of the farmer. No further legal requirements were necessary for the leave collection of this commercially available plant. The collection of this plant material complied with the relevant institutional (Bharathiar University), national, and international guidelines and legislation. It was authenticated at the Botanical Survey of India, whose voucher specimens number was BSI/SRC/5/23/2019/Tech and deposited at the Department Zoology, BharathiarUniversity. The leaves were rinsed by tap water and dried at room temperature (28 ± 2 °C), and finely powdered. Powdered leave material (10 g) were boiled with 100 mL of double distilled water for further nanocomposite preparation.

Synthesis of ZnO NPs

The leaf extract was combined with 1-mM ZnNO3 (Sigma-Aldrich, India) solution and was stirred at room temperature (35 ± 2 °C) for 1 h. A brown-yellowish precipitate was heated under stirring at 60 °C for 4 h and further, the solution was continuously stirred at room temperature for 24 h18. The precipitate was dried at 100 °C. The obtained sample was ground gently using a pestle and mortar and finally, the sample was calcined at 400 °C for 3 h.

Characterization

The synthesized ZnO NPs samples were analyzed by a UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–vis DRS) at a wavelength range of 200–700 nm, using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu—UV 2600, Tokyo, Japan)19. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis was carried out using a spectrum 65 FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer Co., Ltd., Massachusetts, USA). ZnO NPs were used for scanning electron microscopy (FEI QUANTA-200; SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)18. XRD pattern were recorded using Cu Kα radiation at a wavelength of 1.54060 Å, with a nickel monochromator in the 2θ range from 10° to 80° using an analytical X-PERT PRO, diffractometer.

Acute toxicity assessment against A. stephensi

In the laboratory the larvae and pupae of A. stephensi (I, II, III, or IV instars) were exposed for 24 h at concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 ppm of L. inermis broth and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 ppm of ZnO NPs in triplicates. Dechlorinated water without acetone served as a control. Using probit analysis (Finney, 1971) LC50 and LC90 were calculated as follows (Eq. 1):

Percent mortality=Number of dead individuals/number of treated individuals×100 1

Biotoxicity assay on Gambusia affinis

Details are provided in our earlier paper Jaganathan et al.17. Teleost fishes of Gambusia affinis were collected from the Tamil Nadu Fisheries Department (Mettur Dam, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India) and maintained at 27 ± 3 °C and R.H. 85% in cement tanks (120 cm diameter, 60 cm depth) filled with field collected water.

ROS determination

ROS Measurement Intracellular ROS was measured using (DCFH-DA, Himedia). DCFH-DA enters cells dichlorofluorescein, which reacts with ROS to form the fluorescent dichlorofluorescein (DCF). Cells were loaded with 5uMDCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C before ZnO NPs treatment. The DCF fluorescence intensity was determined immediately afterwards using spectro-fluorometer with excitation and emission settings of 485 and 530 nm.

Predation assays under standard laboratory conditions

Details are provided in our earlier paper Jaganathan et al.17. Here, predation efficiency of G. affinis adults was assessed against A. stephensi (I–IV) instar larvae. In each trial mosquitoes, n = 200 larvae were introduced with one G. affinis adult in a 2-L glass arena filled with dechlorinated water and five replicates were conducted. Control arenas contained dechlorinated water only. All arenas were checked every 24 h for 5 days and the number of prey missing that were assumed to be eaten by mosquito fish was recorded. After each check, the missing mosquito larvae were replaced with new ones. Predation efficiency was calculated by (Eq. 2).

Predation efficiency=Number of consumed mosquitoes/total number of mosquitoes×100 2

We confirm that the experimental protocol was approved by the here named institutional committee: Institutional Animal Ethical Clearance Certificate (IAEC) of the Bharathiar University, Coimbatore—641046 (see appended original document signed by IAEC Chairman Prof. V. Vijaya Padma).

Predatory efficiency of G. affinis species after treatment with synthesized ZnO NPs

Details are provided in our earlier paper Jaganathan et al.17. Predation assays in contaminated aquatic environments: the predation efficiency of G. affinis adults was assessed against I-IV instar larvae of A. stephensi, after a mosquitocidal treatment with standard and green-synthesized ZnO NPs. For both mosquito species, n = 200 I-IV instar larvae were introduced with one G. affinis adult in a 2 L glass tank filled with dechlorinated water plus 1 mL of the desired concentration of NPs (i.e. 5 ppm of ZnO NPs, 1/3 of the LC50 calculated against I instar mosquito larvae)20. For each mosquito species, three replicates were used. Control was dechlorinated water only. All experimental tanks were checked every 24 h at day and night time and the number of prey eaten by mosquito fishes was recorded. After each checking, the predated mosquito larvae were replaced by new ones. Predation efficiency was calculated using the above-mentioned formula (Eq. 2).

Predation of Mesocyclops aspericornis against malaria mosquitoes

Details are provided in our earlier paper Jaganathan et al.17. In this experiment, the predation efficiency of Mesocyclops aspericornis adults was assessed against A. stephensi larvae. For each instar, n = 100 mosquitoes were introduced, with 10 copepods, in a 500-mL glass beaker containing 250 mL of dechlorinated water. Mosquito larvae were replaced daily by new ones. For each mosquito instar, five replicates were conducted. Control was 250 mL of dechlorinated water without copepods. All beakers were checked after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 days and the number of prey consumed by copepods was recorded. Predatory efficiency was calculated using the following formula (Eq. 2):

Predation efficiency=Number of consumed mosquitoes/total number of mosquitoes×100

Predation of M. aspericornis against malaria mosquitoe post-treatment with ZnO NPs

Here, we evaluated the predation efficiency of M. aspericornis adults against A. stephensi larvae, after a mosquitocidal treatment with synthesized ZnO NPs. For each instar, n = 100 mosquitoes were introduced with 10 copepods in a 500-mL glass beaker filled with dechlorinated water treated with synthesized ZnO NPs (i.e. for both species, 1/3 of the LC50 calculated against first instar larvae). Mosquito larvae were replaced daily with new ones. For each mosquito instar, five replicates were conducted. Consumed by copepods was recorded. Predatory efficiency was calculated using the above-mentioned formula (Eq. 2). Control was dechlorinated water without copepods. All beakers were checked after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 days and the number of prey consumed by copepods was recorded.

Antimicrobial inhibitory assay

All were provided by the Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank Institute of Microbial Technology Sector 39-A, Chandigarh-160,036 (India). Antimicrobial activity of Li-ZnO NPs was tested against the selected bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis) and the fungal strains (Alternaria alternate and Aspergillus flavus) using the disk diffusion method21. The standard inoculum suspension (106 CFU/mL) was streaked over the surface of the media using a sterile cotton swab to ensure confluent growth of the organisms. 10 μL of synthesized ZnO NPs was diluted with two volumes of 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), impregnated on filter paper disks that were placed on the surface of the agar plates. Petri plates were kept for incubation at room temperature (27 °C ± 2) for 24 h. Inhibition was measured in millimeters using a photomicroscope (Leica ES2, Leipzig, Germany) and compared with standard positive controls, i.e. tetracycline (for bacteria) and fluconazole (for fungi).

Cytotoxicity on liver cancer cell lines

Human liver cancer cell line (Hep-G2) was obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune and grown in Eagles Minimum Essential Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)22. The cell lines were cultured and incubated according to the procedure given and used for further toxicity studies.

MTT assay

After 48 h of incubation, 15 μL of MTT (5 mg/ mL) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The medium with MTT was then flicked off and the formed formazan crystals were solubilized in 100 μL of DMSO and then measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader23. Following the below mentioned formula the cell viability will be calculated (Eq. 3):

Percentage cell viability%=(Mean experimental call absorbanceA620/Mean control call absorbanceA620×100 3

Data analysis

SPSS 16.0 version was used for all analyses. The average larval and pupal mortality data were subjected to probit analysis for calculating LC50, LC90, and other statistics at 95% confidence limits, and chi-square values were calculated using the SPSS Statistical software package 13.0 version. Results with P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

As shown in Fig. 1, the absorption spectra obtained for biosynthesized ZnO NP were at 364 nm when investigated under UV-spectroscopy. This absorption was confirmed by the formation ZnO NPs. When L. inermis extract was analyzed by FTIR, its spectrum showed several vibration peaks at 3575, 3272, 2073, 1636 and 489 cm−1. Thereafter, synthesized ZnO NPs spectrum showed vibration peaks at 1473, 878, 668, and 575 cm−1 (Fig. 2). The nanostructure of synthesized ZnO NPs was seen in SEM which acquired 5 nm given in Fig. 3. EDX analysis of synthesized ZnO NPs showed dual peaks which were situated between 1.2 and 8.6 keV, where it is for zinc characteristic lines K and L shell, as shown in Fig. 4. XRD analysis of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles showed intense spectra at 2θ = 31.76°, 34.42°, 36.24°, 47.53°, 56.59°, 62.86°, 66.38°, 67.94°, 69.08°, 72.56°, 76.92° parallel to 100, 002, 101, 102,110, 103, 200, 112, 201, 004, and 202 planes, in that order as shown in Fig. 5. Table 1 predicts the mortality of larval instar and pupae of malarial vector (I–IV young ones) when exposed to L. inermis at the concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 ppm with the following LC50 values: 73.439 (I), 95.204 (II), 110.731 (III), 123.173 (IV), and 131.816 ppm (pupae). Similarly, Table 2 shows the toxicity against larva and pupa of synthesized ZnO NPs. The toxicity was found to be higher at doses of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 ppm whose LC50 were found to be 5.494 (I), 6.801 (II), 9.336 (III), 10.736 (IV), and 12.710 (V) ppm(pupae).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

UV–vis- analysis of synthesized ZnO NPs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FTIR spectrum of Lawsonia inermis-mediated bio-synthesized ZnO NPs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) SEM images of synthesized ZnO NPs; (b) TEM images of synthesized Zno NPs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

EDX analysis of synthesized ZnO NPs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

XRD analysis of synthesized ZnO NPs.

Table 1.

Larval and pupal toxicity of Lawsonia inermis against malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi.

Target LC50 (LC90) 95% confidence limit LC50 (LC90) Regression equation χ2 (d.f. = 4)
Lower Upper
Larva I 73.439 (209.586) 61.579 (164.207) 90.861 (319.918) y = 0.691 + 0.009x 0.046 n.s
Larva II 95.204 (251.494) 78.996 (188.025) 132.702 (434.667) y = 0.781 + 0.008x 0.122 n.s
Larva III 110.731 (249.795) 92.378 (190.816) 153.457(403.497) y = 1.020 + 0.009x 0.422 n.s
Larva IV 123.173 (248.584) 102.902 (192.720) 169.426 (385.424) y = 1.259 + 0.010x 1.081 n.s
Pupa 131.816 (238.775) 111.249 (189.499) 175.947 (349.963) y = 1.579 + 0.012x 0.792 n.s

No mortality was observed in the control.

LC50 = lethal concentration that kills 50% of the exposed organisms.

LC90 = lethal concentration that kills 90% of the exposed organisms.

χ2 = chi-square value.

d.f. = degrees of freedom.

n.s. = not significant (α = 0.05).

Table 2.

Larval and Pupal toxicity effect of ZnO NPs synthesized using Lawsonia inermis against the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi.

Target LC50 (LC90) 95% confidence limit LC50 (LC90) Regression equation χ2 (d.f. = 4)
Lower Upper
Larva I 5.494 (16.661) 4.371 (13.761) 6.487 (22.547) y = 0.630 + 0.115x 0.306 n.s
Larva II 6.801 (18.506) 5.774 (15.055) 8.062 (25.809) y = 0.745 + 0.109x 0.904 n.s
Larva III 9.336 (23.442) 7.877 (18.025) 12.356 (37.361) y = 0.848 + 0.091x 0.192 n.s
Larva IV 10.736 (23.761) 9.070 (18.479) 14.335 (36.609) y = 1.056 + 0.098x 0.189 n.s
Pupa 12.710 (25.022) 10.598 (19.416) 17.547 (38.700) y = 1.323 + 0.104x 0.905 n.s

No mortality was observed in the control.

LC50 = lethal concentration that kills 50% of the exposed organisms.

LC90 = lethal concentration that kills 90% of the exposed organisms.

χ2 = chi-square value.

d.f. = degrees of freedom.

n.s. = not significant (α = 0.05).

Food feeding competence of G. affinis fishes were calculated, against I to IV instar larvae of A. stephensi. Very small doses of synthesized ZnO NPs were treated with water under standard laboratory conditions where the fishes were introduced, their predation rate subsequent after 24 h was 45% (I) to 25.83% (IV). The food utilization of G. affinis was 71.33 (I) to 34.25% (IV), respectively (Table 3). M. aspericornis adults predate on A. stephensi young larval instars. The predatory efficiency per copepod per day was 4.06, 2.87, 1.79 and 1.08 larvae (I, II, III, and IV, respectively). During post-treatment with sub-lethal doses of synthesized ZnO NPs, the predation efficiency was boosted to 4.06, 2.87, 1.79 and 1.67 larvae (I, II, III, and IV, respectively) (Table 4).

Table 3.

Predation efficiency of Gambusia affinis on An. stephensi larvae in standard conditions and post-treatment of ZnO NPs.

Treatment Prey Daylight (0–12 h) Night time (12–24 h) Total predation (n) Total predation (%)
Standard conditions I instar 92.66 ± 2.51 88.33 ± 1.52 180.99 45.00
II instar 1.66 ± 2.08 72.66 ± 2.08 154.32 38.58
III instar 76.33 ± 1.52 54.00 ± 2.00 130.33 32.58
IV instar 59.33 ± 2.51 44.00 ± 2.64 103.33 25.83
Post-treatment with Zn-NPs I instar 155.00 ± 2.64 130.33 ± 2.51 285.33 71.33
II instar 126.00 ± 2.64 107.33 ± 2.30 233.33 58.33
III instar 92.66 ± 3.21 79.66 ± 1.52 172.32 43.08
IV instar 73.00 ± 3.00 64.00 ± 2.00 137.00 34.25

Predation rates are means ± SD of 3 replicates (1 fish vs. 400 mosquitoes per replicate).

Control was clean water without G. affinis fishes.

Within the column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (weighted generalized linear model, P < 0.05).

Table 4.

Predation efficiency of Mesocyclops aspericornis on An. stephensi larvae in standard conditions and post-treatment of ZnO NPs.

Treatment Targets Number of consumed preys Total predation Consumed preys per copepod per day (n)
Control Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Standard conditions I 0 60.25 ± 1.89 50.00 ± 2.16 38.00 ± 2.16 32.00 ± 2.16 23.00 ± 1.63 203.25 4.06
II 0 41.50 ± 1.29 36.00 ± 1.15 28.25 ± 0.80 22.25 ± 1.70 15.50 ± 1.29 143.50 2.87
III 0 26.00 ± 0.81 20.5 ± 0.57 16.50 ± 1.29 14.25 ± 1.70 12.50 ± 0.57 89.75 1.79
IV 0 20.75 ± 0.50 15.25 ± 1.25 9.75 ± 2.62 5.00 ± 0.81 3.25 ± 0.95 54.00 1.08
Post-treatment with ZnO NPs I 0 80.25 ± 1.25 66.75 ± 1.70 57.50 ± 0.80 52.00 ± 0.81 45.25 ± 6.25 301.75 6.03
II 0 53.00 ± 2.16 47.25 ± 1.89 40.5 ± 1.29 32.75 ± 1.70 24.25 ± 1.70 197.75 3.95
III 0 38.00 ± 1.41 31.75 ± 1.70 28.00 ± 0.81 21.25 ± 1.25 14.5 ± 1.29 133.50 2.67
IV 0 28.75 ± 1.70 20.00 ± 0.81 14.25 ± 1.25 12.00 ± 0.81 8.75 ± 0.95 83.75 8.37

Predation rates are means ± SD of four replicates (1 G. affinis fish vs. 100 mosquitoes per replication).

No predation in control (i.e. clean water without G. affinis fish).

Within each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05).

Antimicrobial effects of synthesized ZnO NPs against selected pathogens like E. coli and B. subtilis (bacteria) and fungal species like Alternaria alternate, and Aspergillus flavus were evaluated in the present investigation. Synthesized ZnO NPs were highly effective in inhibiting the growth of E. coli (13.3 mm) which were then followed by B. subtilis (8.4 mm) respectively given in Table 5 and Fig. 6. Similarly, a maximum zone of inhibition was achieved for the fungus Alternaria alternate (11.5 mm), followed by Aspergillus flavus (7.8 mm). Synthesized ZnO NPs treated with Hep-G2 cell lines were tested to ensure its cell viability after 24 h. The cytotoxicity on Hep-G2 cell lines mediated by ZnO NPs exhibited a dose-dependent relationship as shown in Fig. 7. In the present study IC50 values were found to be 21.63 µg/mL (R2 = 0.942; P < 0.001), respectively, and its morphology and cell inhibition was shown in Fig. 8.

Table 5.

Zone of inhibition (mm) by Lawsonia inermis mediated ZnO NPs against bacteria and fungi.

Target Zone of inhibition (mm)
ZnO NPs (μL) Standard
Bacteria Tetracyclin
E. coli 13.3 ± 0.5 14.4 ± 0.4
Bacillus subtilus 08.4 ± 0.4 10.2 ± 0.2
Fungi Fucanazole
Alternaria alternate 11.5 ± 0.2 13.1 ± 0.2
Aspergillus flavus 07.8 ± 0.4 08.1 ± 0.1

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Inhibitory zone of ZnO NPs against pathogenic bacteria and fungi. (A) Escherichia coli, (B) Bacillus subtilis, (C) Alternaria alternate, (D) Aspergillus flavus; Standard: tetracycline for bacteria and fluconazole for fungi.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Cytotoxicity of Hep-G2 cancer cell lines mediated by synthesized ZnO NPs: cell growth inhibition (%); above each column, different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.05).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Cell growth inhibition of Hep-G2 cell lines treated with synthesized ZnO NPs. Apoptotic analysis of synthesized nanomaterials on HepG2 cells under fluorescence microscopy (a) control; (b) 12.5 μg/mL of ZnO NPs; (c) 25 μg/mL of ZnO NPs; (d) 50 μg/mL of ZnO NPs; (e) 75 μg/mL of ZnO NPs; treated cells; (f) 75 μg/mL of ZnO NPs; treated cells, the scale bar represents 50 μm.

ROS results provided a gradual increase of DCF-Fluorescence from 25 to 100 ug/mL ZnO-NPs concentration (Fig. 9). ROS results provided a gradual increase of DCF-Fluorescence from 25 to 100 ug/mL ZnO-NPs concentration Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are well known for their anti-cancer effect due to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation57,58. Therefore, their release into the environment is expected to raise major concern towards ecotoxicity. ZnO nanoparticles have the unique ability to induce oxidative stress in cancer cells, which has been found to be one of the mechanisms of cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles towards cancer cells. This property is due to the semiconductor nature of ZnO. ZnO NPs induces ROS generation, leading to oxidative stress and eventually cell death when the anti-oxidative capacity of the cell is exceeded59,60. In the present work apoptotic induction potential of synthesized ZnO NPs were concentrations dependently, when the concentration increases the ROS production also increased and leading to cancer cell death (Fig. 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

ROS analysis by DCF through ZnO-NPs.

Discussion

As shown in Fig. 1, a UV–vis DRS analysis of synthesized ZnO NPs showed an absorption peak at 364 nm, revealing a blue shift at a band gap value of 3.40 eV. The direct band gap of the synthesized ZnO NPs was evaluated using Eq. (4);

Eg=1240/λmax 4

where Eg provides the band gap (eV) and λmax is the wavelength (nm) of the absorption edge within the spectrum. As a red shift indicates an increase in particle size and a blue shift indicates a decrease in particle size. Generally, green synthesized ZnO NPs show an absorption peak at 375 nm and a band gap at 3.30 eV. The higher band gap ZnO NPs was suitable for biological application, which highly promoted the generation of ROS in NPs17 (see Fig. 9). In this study, synthesized ZnO NPs exhibited a blue shift of an absorption peak at 364 nm higher ban gap value at 3.31 eV. The same trend was observed with previous reports2426.

FT-IR spectrum of L. inermis extract exhibited various stretching and transmittance peaks corresponding to various functional groups including alkyl halides, amine, alkynes, and alcohols. Here, peptide bonds of proteins correspond to N–H and C=O stretching frequencies exhibiting a peak at 3575 cm-1. A similar banding pattern at 3402 cm-1 was reported by Natarajan et al.27 and or alcohols and/or phenols, as well as aliphatic amines support the presence of polyphenols at 1027 ~ 1092 cm−1 for C–N vibration28. The peaks at 802 cm−1, stay for the C–H stretching frequencies within the free catechins in the aromatic ring29. The plant extract consists of bioactive molecules which help in the nucleation process and the formation of Zn (OH)2. After calcining at 4000C, the sample changed from Zn (OH)2 into ZnO NPs23. The synthesized ZnO NPs spectrum reveal several characteristic peaks at 1473, 878, and 668 & 575 cm−1 respectively, being similar in the vibration modes of the functional chemical bonds of C=O symmetric stretching, C–H bending, and weak Zn–O stretching. Evaluating the surface morphology of synthesized ZnO NPs, our results indicate them as spherical structures of an average of 5 nm in size. Typically, the green synthesized ZnO NPs using phytoconstituents and its products attain morphologies like cubic, rod, triangular, spherical, or sometimes they are flat round of sizes ranging between 5 to 35 nm30. Different size and shape of ZnO NPs was related to plant species and bioactive compounds31,32. EDX spectra indicates O and Zn elements having energy levels of 0.5, 1.2, and 8.6 keV, respectively. Moreover, two additional peaks of Cl and Ag were found as well. The major peak of the sample represented Ag, which was due to the sputter coating process with silver (Ag). XRD analysis of synthesized ZnO NPs demonstrated a well-crystallized structure. The three distinctly high diffraction peaks at 2θ = 31.75°, 34.40°, and 36.25° corresponded to the planes of (100), (002), and (101)3335. This was confirmed by the hexagonal structure of ZnO. This was also matching well with the JCPDS card no. 36-1451.

The toxicity on larval and pupal stages of A. stephensi caused by ZnO NPs might be due to the reduction of nanoparticles caused by the plant extract. The tiny NP spheres penetrate cells and interfere with physiological processes such as molting36. The present study corroborates with the findings of Gandhi and Madhusudhan37, who postulated the efficiency of Momordica charantia leaves reducing ZnO NPs against C. quinquefasciatus and A. stephensi. Murugan et al.38 found that Sargassum wightii-synthesized ZnO NPs were highly effective in killing the larvae and pupae of the malaria vector A. stephensi. In contrast, silver nanoparticles were found to be efficient at lower doses against the malarial vector A. stephensi—however, only against its larval instars. Equally high toxic effects against larvae and pupae of A. stephensi. were provided by leaf extracts from both S. occidentalis and Ocimum basilicum. A dose dependent effect was in agreement with previous evidences from other plant extracts39. Our results clearly indicate that ZnO NPs affect pathogen growth by cell wall disruption. ZnO NPs may reduce surface hydrophobicity of bacterial cells and its oxidative stress-resistance genes were down-regulated, causing finally degradation and the death of cells40. ZnO NPs has freshly achieved individual notices concerning possible electronic applications due to its unique optical, electrical, and chemical properties41. Its heterogeneous catalytic property might be the cause for bacterial growth inhibition through different mechanisms as known from conventional antibiotics42,43. Previous reports of 70–74 postulates higher MIC of ZnO NPs against E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhi, and S. aureus provide supportive evidence for the present microbial evaluation. Most of the fungal strains like F. solani, A. alternate, and A. flavus had shown antifungal drug resistance44. Hence it was in need to formulate nanoparticles with potent chemical and structural nature to overcome such drug resistance45.

Similarly, Chobu et al.46 demonstrated that Anopheles gambiae was less efficiently predated upon by the mosquitofish G. affinis. Murugan et al.47 noted that the teleost guppy fish, P. reticulata actively predates on the larvae of A. stephensi. Subramaniam et al.48 mentioned another study showing that green synthesized Ag NPs with Mimusops elengi did not affect predation rates of the mosquitofish G. affinis on the mosquitoes A. albopictus and A. stephensi. In a paper by Murugan et al.49 the predatory efficiency of a single copepod species belonging to M. aspericornis was 8.0, 6.3, 0.8, and 0.2 larvae (instar I, II, III, and IV, respectively) per day after a post-treatment with seaweed-synthesized silver nanoparticles. Mahesh Kumar et al.50 studied the predatory efficiency of a single adult copepod of M. thermocyclopoides being 6.5, 4.6, 0.76, and 0.14 C. quinquefasciatus larvae per day (instar I, II, III, and IV, respectively). The predatory efficiency was enhanced to 8.7, 5.9, 1.2, and 0.36 larvae day (instar I, II, III, and IV, respectively) after treatment with Solanum xanthocarpum fruit extract. Khooshe-Bast et al.51 insecticidal effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles made with Beauveria bassiana TS11 on the hemipteran insect Trialeurodes vaporariorum.

Several tracemetal based NPs showed effect against different cancer cell lines. Generally, were quantum dot approaches shown as being effective among others in cancer treatment. Ahmad et al. (2020) 52 could demonstrate cytotoxicity and cell death induced by engineered nanostructures (quantum dots and nanoparticles) in human cell lines. Gold quantum dots shown to impair the tumorigenic potential of glioma stem-like cells via β-catenin downregulation. Zinc oxide quantum dots were demonstrated as Multifunctional candidates for arresting C2C12 cancer cells and their role towards caspase 3 and 7 genes53. ZnO NPs also acted as anticancer agents with minimum dosage as confirmed by the IC50 values. In the later study the anti cervical cancer effect of ZnONPs against SiHa cancer cells was evaluated using MTT and apoptosis was evaluated. ZnONPs indicated a suppression of SiHa cells with no cytotoxic effect on normal PBMC cells. Results of cytological staining suggested that ZnONPs induced apoptosis through DNA damage and activation of mitochondria mediated intrinsic pathways. Microwave plasma-assisted silicon nanoparticles were shown to be cytotoxic and to have molecular and numerical responses against cancer cells54. Silver nanoparticles and earthworm combinations mediated anti-proliferative activity at increasing concentration as revealed by DNA analysis of Hep-G2 cells55,56. In accordance to our present findings were Amorphophallus paeoniifolius peels ZnO NP inducing cancer cell apoptosis at higher concentrations57. Green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles mediated by Mentha spicata extract induce plant systemic resistance against Tobacco mosaic virus (Abdelkhalek et al. 2020)18.

Depending on their reactivity and localization, ROS are involved in physiological (termed oxidative eustress) and pathophysiological processes (termed oxidative stress). One major source of increased cellular ROS levels is dysfunctional mitochondria. However, increased ROS levels and, in consequence, an altered redox status of the cell provide a specific vulnerability of cancer cells, which can be used for therapeutic approaches. Recently, two opposing redox status modulating therapies have been tested in clinical trials. In the first approach, antioxidants are used to lower the content of ROS in tumor cells upon treatment of ZnO NPs, subsequently inducing cell cycle arrest and, lastly, apoptosis. The other pro oxidative concept aims to increase the ROS level of cancer cells to an extent that exceeds their survival strategies, and in the end results in an increased apoptotic rate as well57. Normally, the imbalance of the pro oxidative and antioxidative systems towards higher ROS levels in cancer cells is still maintained below a cytotoxic threshold. Impairment of the cellular antioxidant system or treatment with exogenous ROS generating agents might exceed a certain ROS threshold, thus resulting in detrimental oxidative stress in the nanomaterial treated cells58.

Early apoptotic cells were comparable in abundance to untreated cells up to 12 h after exposure. However, early necrotic cells slightly increased from 12 to 17% at 3 h, although this increase was not significant59. On the other hand, viable cells diminished, whereas dead cells significantly accumulated at 12 h. Similarly, ZnO-treated BEAS-2B cells showed an increase in apoptotic cells but not in necrotic cells (Fig. 3C). As these results did not definitively establish apoptosis or necrosis as a driver of ZnO cytotoxicity, we quantified cleaved PARP, an apoptotic marker60.

Conclusion

The emergence of multi-drug resistance of vectors and microbes provides a major obstacle for the management of mosquito vectors, cancer, and microorganisms. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop a novel strategy to combat mosquito vectors, and management of cancer. The biosynthesized ZnONPs tested for the lower concentrations possessed larvicidal and pupicidal antimosquito-activities. Field experiments evidenced in addition that larval and pupal populations were reduced with time (24, 48, 72 h). They also boosted the predatory efficiency of the mosquito-fish Gambusia affinis and copepods at the breeding sites. So, it can be concluded that these nanoparticles are most effective in controlling the targeted mosquitoes. Moreover, administration of nanoparticles was shown as one of the vector control measures and further indirectly decreased disease transmission and this way assisted to manage diseases at the community and societal level of larger populations. This kind of bioinsecticide package will further decrease poverty and nuisance in mosquito endemic countries by killing mosquitoes and block disease transmission in a harmonious way and this promotes public health to the society. The same holds for conventional hazards imposed by chemicals in delivery matrices and using nanoparticles to reduce toxicity and side effects of drugs. Moreover, raw materials for the preparation of biosynthesized ZnONPs are easily available, cheap, when compared to other metal oxide nanoparticles like gold, palladium and silver. The final products provided high yields of approximately (85–95%) with high purity (97–99%). Hence, we conclude that the biogenesis of L. inermis-mediated ZnONPs could be used as a multipurpose agent against mosquitoe larvae, being antimicrobial and anticancer at the same time for societal benefit in the field of biomedical applications.

Acknowledgments

Dr. J. Anitha is grateful to the University Grant Commission (New Delhi, India), Project No. PDFSS-2014-15-SC-TAM-10125. A grant from MOST to Tan Han Shih (Hans-Uwe Dahms) is gratefully acknowledged (MOST 107-2621-M-037-001, MOST 108-2621-M-037-001, and MOST 109-2621-M-037-001 to T.H. Shih). This work was supported partially by the Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan and by Kaohsiung Medical University Research Center Grant (KMU-TC108A01). The financial support from Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (Grant no. MOST 107-2621-M-019-001, MOST 108-2621-M-019-003 and MOST 109-2621-M-019-002) and Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering (Grant no. 109J13801-51) to J.-S. Hwang.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Jiang-Shiou Hwang, Email: jshwang@mail.ntou.edu.tw.

Kadarkarai Murugan, Email: kmvvkg@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Benelli G. Green synthesized nanoparticles in the fight against mosquito-borne diseases and cancer—a brief review. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 2016;95:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dash AP, Valecha N, Anvikar AR. Malaria in India: challenges and opportunities. J. Biosci. 2008;33(4):583–928. doi: 10.1007/s12038-008-0076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Malaria Report: Geneva: World Health Organization. Accessed 18th July 2017.
  • 4.Olotu A, Fegan G, Wambua J, Nyangweso G, Leach A, et al. Seven-year efficacy of RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine among young African children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Solomona S, Plattnerb GK, Knuttic R, Friedlingsteind P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009;106:1704–1709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812721106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaalan EAS, Canyonb D, Younesc MWF, Abdel-Wahaba H, Mansoura AH. A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential. Environ. Int. 2005;3:1149–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sundukov YN. First record of the ground beetle Trechoblemus postilenatus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Primorskii krai. Far East Entomol. 2006;165:16. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soni N, Prakash S. Green nanoparticles for mosquito control. Sci. World J. 2014;214:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2014/496362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abinaya M, Vaseeharan B, Divya M, Vijayakumar S, Govindarajan M, et al. Structural characterization of Bacillus licheniformis Dahb1 exopolysaccharide antimicrobial potential and larvicidal activity on malaria and Zika virus mosquito vectors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:5. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shawkey AM, Rabeh MA, Abdulall AK, Abdellatif AO. Green nanotechnology: anticancer activity of silver nanoparticles using Citrullus colocynthis aqueous extracts. Adv. Life Sci. Technol. 2013;13:60–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thomas S, Ravishankaran S, Johnson Amala Justin NA. Resting and feeding preferences of Anopheles stephensi in an urban setting, perennial for malaria. Malar. J. 2017;16(11):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1764-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murugan K, Roni M, Panneerselvam C, Aziz AT, Suresh U, et al. Sargassum wightii-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles reduce the fitness and reproduction of the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018;101:202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kalimuthu K, Panneerselvam C, Murugan K, Hwang JS. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Cadaba indica Lam leaf extract and its larvicidal and pupicidal activity against Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus. J. Entomol. Acarol. Res. 2013;45(2):e11. doi: 10.4081/jear.2013.e11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Patra A, Raja ASM, Shah N. Current developments in (Malaria) mosquito protective methods: a review paper. Int. J. Mosquito Res. 2019;6(1):38–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wahab R, Ahmad J, Ahmad N. Application of multi-dimensional (0D, 1D, 2D) nanostructures for the cytological evaluation of cancer cells and their bacterial response. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019;583:123953. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bhadra J, Alkareem A, Al-Thani N. A review of advances in the preparation and application of polyaniline based thermoset blends and composites. J. Polym. Res. 2020;27(5):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10965-020-02052-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jaganathana A, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, et al. (+16), Earthworm-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: a potent toolagainst hepatocellular carcinoma, Plasmodium falciparum parasites and malaria mosquitoes. Parasitol. Int. 2016;65(2016):276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abdelkhalek A, Al-Askar AA. Green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles mediated by Mentha spicata extract induce plant systemic resistance against Tobacco mosaic virus. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:15. doi: 10.3390/app10155054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ishwarya R, Vaseeharan B, Kalyani S, Banumathi B, Govindarajan M, et al. Facile green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Ulva lactuca seaweed extract and evaluation of their photocatalytic, antibiofilm and insecticidal activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2018;2018(178):249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murugan K, Raman C, Panneerselvam C, Madhiyazhagan P, Subramanium J, et al. Nano-insecticides for the control of human and crop pests. In: Raman C, Goldsmith M, Agunbiade T, et al., editors. Short Views on Insect Genomics and Proteomics. Entomology in Focus. Springer; 2016. pp. 229–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966;45(4):493–496. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anitha J, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Madhiyazhagan P, Dinesh D, et al. Earthworm-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: a potent tool against hepatocellular carcinoma, Plasmodium falciparum parasites and malaria mosquitoes. Parasitol. Int. 2016;65:276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wahab R, Khan F, Al-Khedhairy AA. Hematite iron oxide nanoparticles: apoptosis of myoblast cancer cells and their arithmetical assessment. RSC Adv. 2018;8(44):24750–24759. doi: 10.1039/C8RA02613K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:411–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rajan R, Chandran K, Harper SL, Yun SI, Kalaichelvan PT. Plant extract synthesized nanoparticles: an ongoing source of novel biocompatible materials. Ind. Crop Prod. 2015;70:356–373. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Suresh U, Murugan K, Benelli G, Nicoletti M, Barnard DR, et al. Tackling the growing threat of dengue: Phyllanthus niruri-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their mosquitocidal properties against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Parasitol. Res. 2015;114:1551–1562. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4339-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Natarajan K, Selvaraj S, Murty VR. Microbial production of silver nanoparticle. Digest J. Nanomat. Biostruct. 2010;5:135–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Song YJ, Jang HK, Kim SB. Biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Magnolia kobus and Diopyros kaki leaf extract. Process Biochem. 2009;44:1133–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krishnan R, Maru GB. Isolation and analysis of polymeric polyphenol fractions from black tea. Food Chem. 2006;94:331–340. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shankar S, Rai A, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Rapid synthesis of Au, Ag and bimetallic Au core-Ag shell nanoparticles using Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf broth. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275:496–550. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chandran SP, Chaudhary M, Pasricha R, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Synthesis of gold nanotriangles and silver nanoparticles using Aloe vera plant extract. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006;22:577–583. doi: 10.1021/bp0501423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Benelli G. Plant-synthesized nanoparticles: an eco-friendly tool against mosquito vectors? In: Mehlhorn H, editor. Nanoparticles in the Fight Against Parasites Parasitology Research Monographs. Springer; 2015. pp. 155–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sadraei R. A simple method for preparation of nano-sized ZnO. Res. Rev. J. Chem. 2016;5(2):45–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Priyadarshini KA, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Ponarulselvam S, Hwang JS, et al. Biolarvicidal and pupicidal potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Euphorbia hirta against Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) Parasitol. Res. 2012;111(3):997–1006. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2924-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Satheeshkumar K, Kathireswari P. Biological synthesis of Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPS) by Lawsonia inermis (Henna) plant aqueous extract and its antimicrobial activity against human pathogens. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2016;5:926–937. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nareshkumar G, Thomson D, Nouf-Allehiani M, Bruckbauer J, Edwards PR, et al. Electron channeling contrast imaging for III-nitride thin film structures. Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 2016;2016(47):44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gandhi S, Madhusudhan N. Retrieval of exoplanet emission spectra with HyDRA. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017;47:1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murugan K, Aarthi N, Kovendan K, Panneerselvam C, Chandramohan B, et al. Mosquitocidal and antiplasmodial activity of Senna occidentalis (Cassiae) and Ocimum basilicum (Lamiaceae) from Maruthamalai hills against Anopheles stephensi and Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitol. Res. 2015;114:3657–3664. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4593-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dinesh D, Murugan K, Madhiyazhagan P, Panneerselvam C, Nicoletti M, et al. Mosquitocidal and antibacterial activity of green-synthesized silver nanoparticles from Aloe vera extracts: towards an effective tool against the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi? Parasitol. Res. 2015;114:1519–1529. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4336-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pati F, Jang J, Dong-Heon H, Won Kim S, Jong-Won R, et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3935. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Baxter JB, Aydil ES. Nanowire based dye sensitized solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005;86:53114. doi: 10.1063/1.1861510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, et al. Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;90(21):213902–213903. doi: 10.1063/1.2742324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chwalibog A, Sawosz E, Hotowy A, Szeliga J, Mitura S, et al. Visualization of interaction between inorganic nano-particles and bacteria or fungi. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2010;2010(5):1085–1094. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S13532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Saha S, Dhanasekaran D, Chandraleka S, Panneerselvam C. A Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of cobalt metal complex against multi drug resistant bacterial and fungal pathogen Facta universitatis series. Phys. Chem. Technol. 2009;7(1):73–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vivek M, Kumar PS, Steffi S, Sudha S. Biogenic silver nanoparticles by Gelidiella acerosa extract and their antifungal effects Avicenna. J. Med. Biotechnol. 2011;3(3):143. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chobu M, Nkwengulila G, Mahande AM, Mwangonde BJ, Kweka EJ. Direct and indirect effect of predators on Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Acta Trop. 2015;142:131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Murugan K, Dinesh D, Kavithaa K, Paulpandi M, Ponraj T, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: mosquitocidal potential and anticancer activity on human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) Parasitol. Res. 2016;115:1085–1096. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4838-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Subramaniam J, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Kovendan K, Madhiyazhagan P, et al. Eco-friendly control of malaria and arbovirus vectors using the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis and ultra-low dosages of Mimusops elengi-synthesized silver nanoparticles: towards an integrative approach? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015;22(24):20067–20083. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5253-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Murugan K, Priyanka V, Dinesh D, Madhiyazhagan P, Panneerselvam C, et al. Predation by Asian bullfrog tadpoles, Hoplobatrachus tigerinus, against the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in an aquatic environment treated with mosquitocidal nanoparticles. Parasitol. Res. 2015;114:3601–3610. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4582-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mahesh Kumar P, Murugan K, Kovendan K, Panneerselvam C, Prasanna Kumar K, et al. Mosquitocidal activity of Solanum xanthocarpum fruit extract and copepod Mesocyclops thermocyclopoides for the control of dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Parasitol. Res. 2012;111:609–618. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2876-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Khooshe-Bast Z, Sahebzadeh N, Ghaffari-Moghaddam M, Mirshekar A. Insecticidal effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and Beauveria bassiana TS11 on Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood, 1856) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Acta Agric Slov. 2016;107(2):299. doi: 10.14720/aas.2016.107.2.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ahmad J, Wahab R, Siddiqui MA, Saquib Q, Al-Khedhairy AA. Cytotoxicity and cell death induced by engineered nanostructures (quantum dots and nanoparticles) in human cell lines. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2020;25(2):325–338. doi: 10.1007/s00775-020-01764-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wahab R, Kaushik N, Khan F, et al. Gold quantum dots impair the tumorigenic potential of glioma stem-like cells via β-catenin downregulation in vitro. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019;14:1131–1148. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S195333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wahab R, Saquib Q, Faisal M. Zinc oxide nanostructures: a motivated dynamism against cancer cells. Process Biochem. 2020;98(June):83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.07.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wahab R, Khan F, Gupta A, et al. Microwave plasma-assisted silicon nanoparticles: cytotoxic, molecular, and numerical responses against cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2019;9(23):13336–13347. doi: 10.1039/C8RA10185J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Anitha J, Selvakumar R, Murugan K. Chitosan capped ZnO nanoparticles with cell specific apoptosis induction through P53 activation and G2/M arrest in breast cancer cells—In vitro approaches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;136:686–696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wahab R, Khan F, Yang YB, et al. Zinc oxide quantum dots: Multifunctional candidates for arresting C2C12 cancer cells and their role towards caspase 3 and 7 genes. RSC Adv. 2016;6(31):26111–26120. doi: 10.1039/C5RA25668B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liu J, Wang Z. Increased oxidative stress a selective anticancer therapy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015;2015:294303. doi: 10.1155/2015/294303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Droese S, Brandt U. Molecular mechanisms of superoxide production by the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012;748:145–169. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3573-0_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gupta SC, Hevia D, Patchva S, Park B, Koh W, Aggarwal BB. Upsides and downsides of reactive oxygen species for cancer: the roles of reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis, prevention, and therapy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012;16:1295–1322. doi: 10.1089/ars.2011.4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES