Skip to main content
Journal of Orthopaedics logoLink to Journal of Orthopaedics
. 2021 Apr 1;25:59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.03.015

Management of thumb carpometacarpal joint dislocations: A systematic review

Jennifer S Kim a, Kumail Hussain a, Devan O Higginbotham b,, Andrew G Tsai b
PMCID: PMC8065249  PMID: 33927510

Abstract

Although rare, thumb Carpometacarpal (CMC) joint dislocations can have significant complications which impact hand function. Optimal management is crucial in restoring pinch and grasp strength, but no agreement exists regarding treatment due to a paucity of literature on this subject. Systematic review was conducted involving non-operative and operative management of the CMC joint. 15 articles with a total of 60 thumbs were evaluated from published literature. 12/60 thumbs with isolated CMC joint dislocations were treated with closed reduction, with 4 cases needing additional ligament repair due to joint instability post-reduction. 51/60 of the isolated CMC joint dislocations had ligament reconstruction, with flexor carpi radialis tendon autograft (29/51) as the most popular option. 60/60 patients regained full function and stability of the CMC joint with significant pain relief. Although good surgical outcomes have been achieved, long term clinical outcome reporting is needed to develop a standardized approach to treatment.

Keywords: CMC dislocation, Thumb, Hand injury, Metacarpal fractures, Ligament reconstruction

1. Introduction

Isolated thumb Carpometacarpal (CMC) joint dislocations are rare injuries, accounting for less than 1% of all hand injuries.1 Optimal management is crucial in restoring pinch and grasp strength, but no agreement exists regarding treatment of these dislocations due to a paucity of literature on this subject. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature, summarizing non-surgical and surgical intervention strategies which may maximize the repair of thumb CMC joint dislocations.

2. Methods

2.1. Systematic review of the literature

The study protocol followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search criteria and inclusion criteria were specified in advance. In June 2020, two authors (JSK and KH) independently queried the PubMed database with the following search terms: thumb CMC joint AND isolated traumatic dislocation OR ligamentous reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were studies published in the English language that described management of the thumb CMC joint. Selected articles were screened and cross-referenced to ensure the inclusion of all potential studies. The final articles included in the database were then reviewed for patient demographics, injury characteristics, and treatment strategies.

3. Results

The search query yielded 61 initial articles, of which 17 met inclusion criteria and were selected for review of full text (Fig. 1). After removal of 2 articles due to unextractable data, 15 studies were used for a PRISMA compliant systematic review of the literature – reporting 56 patients with a total of 60 thumbs (4 patients with both thumbs injured) treated for isolated CMC joint dislocation. The patient cohort was 64% female and 36% male, with an average age of 32.8 years (range: 18–56). Mechanisms of injury varied equally, with motorcycle accident, fall injury, and sport injury being the most common. Twelve out of 60 thumbs with isolated CMC joint dislocations were treated with closed reduction (20%), of which 4 cases needed additional ligament repair due to joint instability post-reduction. Eighty-five percent of the isolated CMC joint dislocations had ligament reconstruction (51/60), with flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon as the most popular option (29/51) followed by abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon (15/51). Forty-six percent of the isolated CMC joint dislocations had trapeziectomy (28/60). All patients that were treated with either closed reduction, open reduction internal fixation, or ligament repair regained full function and stability of the CMC joint with significant relief from pain and symptoms (60/60). Of the 3 articles that reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the mean post-operative score was 47.9. Detailed patient, injury and surgical characteristics are reported in Table 1 and Table 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PRISMA Flow DiagramPRISMA

(Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flowchart of the systematic literature review.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics Study population demographics.

First author (Year) Type of Study # of patients Mean age (year) Sex Mechanism of injury/etiology
Jeong (2018) Case report 1 (2 operated thumbs) 50 M Motorcycle accident
Lahiji (2015) Case report and literature review 6 25.8 2 F, 4 M Trauma, motorcycle accident, skiing injury, sport injury
Kose (2015) Case report 1 26 Motorcycle accident
Annappa (2015) Case report 1 47 M Motorcycle accident
Wollstein (2016) Case report 1 56 M Chronic thumb CMC joint dislocation, without h/o of trauma or isolated incident
Takwale (2004) Retrospective Cohort Study 26 31 19 F, 7 M Fall injury, trauma, sport injury
Stauffer (2019) Retrospective Cohort Study 12 (15 operated thumbs) 23.2 11 F, 1 M Chronic CMC instability
Baker (2014) Prospective Case Study 1 Eaton and Lambert Stage IV first CMC osteoarthritis with collapse of the trapezium
Chan (2013) Case report 1 22 F Accident (“opening a door at a funny angle”)
Matshuhashi (2010) Case report 1 18 M Subluxation following injury of the medial nerve recurrent branch (broken pieces of a bottle)
Suresh (2012) Case report 1 36 Road traffic accident
Lyengar (2013) Case report and literature review 1 21 F Accident (forceful hyperextension of the digit)
Fotiadis (2010) Case report 1 27 M Fall injury
Kraus (2014) Case report 1 21 M Fall/sport injury
Slocum (2019) Case report 1 56 M Accident

Table 2.

Injury and Surgical Characteristics Injury characteristics, treatment details, and clinical results.

First author (Year) Other injuries Affected ligament Treatment Follow-up Clinical results
Jeong (2018) Dorsal ligament and volar oblique ligament
  • Open reduction with ligamentous reconstruction using Flexor Carpi Radialis tendon on the left thumb

  • Closed reduction with fixation with K-wires on the right thumb

16 months
  • Normal ROM and strength without joint instability

  • Mild stiffness, no pain or chronic instability of the left thumb

Lahiji (2015) Dorsal and oblique collateral ligament
  • Open reduction with ligamentous reconstruction (tendon not specified)

  • Closed reduction

  • Near normal ROM without tenderness

Kose (2015) Closed reduction 6 months
  • Full ROM in the CMC joint, without pain or instability

  • Final hand radiographs demonstrated congruent CMC joint and trapezium fracture union

Annappa (2015) Dorsal ligament complex
  • Open reduction

  • Fixation with K-wires

  • Ligamentous reconstruction with Flexor Carpi Radialis tendon

2 years
  • Full ROM without instability

  • No evidence of subluxation or early osteoarthritis

Wollstein (2016)
  • Suspension and interposition arthroplasty

  • Removal of trapezium

6 months
  • Re-gain of full function, stable MCP joint during power pinch and grip

  • Retrospective DASH improved to 78 vs. 100 pre-op

Takwale (2004) Anterior oblique ligament Ligamentous reconstruction with Flexor Carpi Radialis tendon 4 years
  • Significant relief from pain and symptoms in 87% of the patients

  • Mean grip strength recovered to 86% of the contralateral side

Stauffer (2019) Ligamentous reconstruction with Abductor Pollicis Longus tendon Average 3.5 years (1.3–5.8)
  • Mean DASH score: 13.3

  • Mean VAS score: 1.1 at rest

  • Mean Nelson score: 87.7

  • Mean Kapanji opposition score (ROM evaluation): 9.8/10

  • No significant difference in grip, pinch strength, and passive stability between operated and non-operated hands

Baker (2014)
  • Ligamentous reconstruction with Palmaris Longus tendon as an intermetacarpal spacer and sling

  • Trapeziectomy

6 months
  • Post-op DASH score improved to 52.6 vs. 64.7 pre-op

  • Post-op VAS score improved to 0 vs. 8 pre-op

  • Postop grip strength (% contralateral) improved to 83 vs. 64 pre-op

  • Kapanji opposition score (ROM evaluation): 10/10

  • No reported complications

Chan (2013) Manipulation under anesthesia 2 months
  • Full ROM of the first CMC joint without pain

Matshuhashi (2010)
  • Median nerve recurrent branch injury

  • Passive reduction

  • Opponenplasty with Flexor Digtorium Superficialis tendon

7 months
  • Improved radial and palmar abduction

  • No apparent joint instability of the affected CMC joint

  • Articular congruity with reduction of CMC joint subluxation

  • Recovered thumb opposition

Suresh (2012) Closed reduction 15 months
  • Full ROM of the thumb, well reduced and stable TM joint without any signs of arthritis

  • Possible calcification in the straight anterolateral ligament

Lyengar (2013) Anterior oblique ligament
  • After failed closed reduction, modified Eaton-Littler technique

  • Fixation K-wires

  • Ligamentous reconstruction with Flexor Carpi Radialis tendon

1 year
  • Full range of joint mobility of the thumb without pain

  • Return to pre-injury level of activity

  • Improved grip strength by Jamar hand dynamometer (10.6 kg pre op to 20.8 kg post op) and improved pinch grip (4.7 kg–6.5 kg)

Fotiadis (2010) Dorsoradial ligament
  • Closed reduction

  • Reconstruction of the dorsal capsuloligamentous complex due to joint instability

3 years
  • Normal joint alignment, no evidence of subluxation, pain free

  • Return to pre-injury level of activity

Kraus (2014) Closed reduction
  • None reported (Emergency department case report)

Slocum (2019) Closed reduction 2 years
  • Full ROM of the thumb, well reduced and stable TM joint without any signs of arthritis

  • Return to pre-injury work and daily activity level

DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; ROM: Range of Motion; CMC: Carpometacarpal; MCP: Metacarpophalangeal.

4. Discussion

4.1. Anatomy of the thumb CMC joint

CMC joint dislocation of the thumb is an uncommon injury because of its strong capsule-ligamentous structure. Unlike the interphalangeal joints and MCP joints, the CMC joint is a biconcave saddle joint capable of a wide range of motion.3 Because of the essential role the thumb plays in the majority of handling maneuvers from fine pinch to forceful grasp, loss of thumb function may impart up to 50% rate of upper extremity impairment.8 The thumb CMC joint is stabilized by sixteen ligaments, with anterior oblique ligament, dorsoradial ligament, 1st inter-metacarpal ligament, posterior oblique ligament, and ulnar collateral ligament being the main contributors.6 There exists some controversy about which ligament provides the most stability, but multiple studies identify the dorsoradial ligament as the main restraint to dorsal subluxation in both traumatic and degenerative conditions.3,7 In a cadaveric study of 38 thumbs, Strauch et al. found the largest degree of joint subluxation when the dorsoradial ligament was cut while all other ligaments were intact.16 These findings, which highlighted the importance of the dorsoradial ligament complex in CMC joint dislocations, were supported by several other biomechanical studies.17, 18, 19 Most CMC joint dislocations result from forceful flexion of the thumb metacarpal base and dorsal translation with or without an accompanying axial load.7 The volar capsule is reinforced by multiple ligaments and relatively stronger and thicker than the thin dorsal capsule; as such, an avulsion of the metacarpal base is usually seen.7

4.2. Clinical presentation

Understanding the pathophysiology of thumb CMC joint dislocations is important in determining appropriate management. The mechanisms of dislocation can be largely divided into posttraumatic and degenerative conditions. Injuries to the hand account for up to 15% of all sport injuries.9 These injuries are particularly prevalent in contact sports and in sports with a higher risk of falling, such as football, skiing, and biking.9 Motorcycle accidents are another major contributor to hand injury as noted in multiple case reports.2,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 In particular, metacarpal fractures account for 30% of all hand fractures and are the most common injuries examined in the emergency setting.22, 23, 24 Injuries to the thumb CMC joint can be partial or complete, with partial being significantly more common.34 Complete injuries occur with axial force when flexed, resulting in dorsal dislocation and tearing of the dorsal radial ligament and anterior oblique ligament.34 CMC joint dislocations are most frequently associated with metacarpal fractures, namely Bennett and Rolando fractures. Degenerative conditions that can contribute to the thumb CMC joint location include osteoarthritis, synovitis associated with rheumatoid arthritis, and postmenopausal laxity.33 With the extensive motion allowed for in the CMC joint comes inherent instability. The continuous physical stresses on the base of the thumb make it prone to attenuation of the ligamentous structures and subsequent joint arthritis.20 The main consequences of CMC joint instability are pain, weakness, ecchymosis, and edema in the thenar region.33

4.3. Treatment approach

Relatively little agreement exists regarding optimal treatment options for thumb CMC joint dislocations. Many studies state that joint stability after reduction is the most critical factor when deciding whether to manage a dislocation with non-operative or operative treatment.2,34 If the joint is stable upon reduction, immobilization of the joint in a thumb spica cast for 4–6 weeks may be sufficient.2,34 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroid injections may be supplemented to alleviate inflammation and reduce pain.33 In most cases, however, the joint tends to remain unstable after reduction and surgical interventions are indicated.2,34 Though some may prefer conservative treatments, non-operative management of thumb metacarpal fractures has fallen out of favor for the purpose of preventing persistent articular incongruity and subsequent posttraumatic arthritis.21 Surgical options include closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

The literature provides conflicting viewpoints on superiority of surgical technique. At a mean follow up of 7 years, Lutz and colleagues demonstrated no significant differences in clinical outcome or the prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis between those who received CRPP and ORIF in the treatment of Bennett's fracture.25 In contrast with such findings, Simonian and Trumble reported unsatisfactory outcome secondary to degenerative arthritis and recurrent instability in 50% of the patients who were initially treated with CRPP.26 These patients were able to achieve improved range of motion and pain relief after switching to early ligamentous reconstruction.26 In accordance with Simonian and Trumble, several other studies noted favorable clinical outcome with ligamentous reconstruction and underlined its importance in the setting of unresolving instability.4,27 Improved outcome after additional ligament repair in 4 out of the 12 thumbs that were initially treated with closed reduction demonstrated joint instability post-reduction. Regardless of the treatment strategy, the goal should be timely repair that prevents chronic joint instability and arthritic pain while maximizing return of function.11

Because thumb CMC joint dislocations result in ligamentous injury, ORIF is often performed with ligamentous reconstruction. Shah and Patel reported ORIF alone was not sufficient in treatment of the thumb CMC joint dislocation – highlighting the importance of simultaneous capsular and ligamentous reconstruction in restoring function.28 While there currently exists no universal protocol, FCR is a popular autograft option originally introduced by Eaton and Littler.29 FCR is considered as an excellent autograft choice because of its proximity to the dislocated site and its ability to correct hypermobility of the CMC joint. Several studies utilized FCR for ligamentous reconstruction and reported satisfactory results in re-gaining of full range of motion in the CMC joint, without pain or signs of subluxation.2,14,27,35 Other published treatment modalities regarding tendon autograft include APL tendon and palmaris longus (PL). The APL tendon was utilized by Stauffer and colleagues to successfully restore stability of the thumb CMC joint at the mean follow-up of 3.5 years.30 Baker and Sood used PL tendon to perform first CMC joint suspension arthroplasty and found improved pinch and grip strength without any complications at 6 months.31 In comparison with FCR and APL, PL was noted to be advantageous for allowing a surgical technique that anchors the first metacarpal in a more distal position.31 In our study, 85% of the isolated CMC joint dislocations had ligament reconstruction, with FCR as the most popular option (57%) followed by APL (29%). All patients that were treated with either FCR or APL demonstrated normal range of motion without tenderness or signs of instability, supporting the efficacy of both tendons in ligamentous reconstruction.

4.4. Post-operative management

Postoperative therapeutic management is vital in enhancing function and range of motion of the repaired thumb. Complications limiting range of motion can arise from either non-operative or operative management of the thumb dislocation; both tendinous adhesions from ORIF and post-injury stiffness from extended splinting can result in decreased range of motion.21 Once the reconstructed joint gets necessary rest, light to moderate exercises are encouraged to maintain the soft tissue flexibility.33 Wollstein and colleagues in a case report of a chronic thumb CMC joint dislocation showed the importance of exercises aimed at lengthening and strengthening the soft-tissue dynamic and static stabilizers of the joint.20 A systematic review of poor-quality studies by Feehan and Bassett suggested in simple closed metacarpal fractures, early motion (<21 days) of joints could help achieve earlier recovery of mobility and strength.32 However, it is important to note that the scientific validity of this claim has yet to be proven by higher quality studies.

4.5. Limitations

Currently, the literature lacks consensus on the main ligament stabilizer of the CMC joint and on the optimal management after dislocation. This is mainly due to the small number of case reports and retrospective studies due to the uncommon nature of thumb CMC joint dislocations. In addition, there exists a lack of uniform functional outcomes reporting. Quantified results of standardized methods such as DASH in measuring postoperative outcomes lack sufficient quantity of published literature in order to form a unified consensus on standard of care. Post-operative results reported in subjective terms like “satisfactory” cannot be appropriately assessed to draw precise conclusions. Lastly, there is a lack of quality of life reporting across the literature. Successful surgical outcome does not always translate to better functional outcome and quality of life. The primary goals of treatment are to help the patient return to their prior level of function with as much unrestricted motion as possible, and measures of quality of life can be used to evaluate the effect of treatment.

5. Conclusion

Despite being rare injuries, CMC joint dislocations of the thumb are important orthopedic complications that may have a significant impact on hand function. Good surgical outcomes have been reported in limited case reports, however heterogenous reporting of clinical outcomes in the literature underscore the need for improved quality of life and functional outcomes reporting with long term follow-up. Higher quality research, such as prospective cohort study and randomized controlled trial, is necessary to determine the best management technique.

Author Statement

Contributorship: JK and KH researched literature and conceived the study. JK performed systematic review and statistical analysis. JK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Refernces

  • 1.Mueller J.J. Carpometacarpal dislocations: report of five cases and review of the literature. J Hand Surg. 1986;11:184–188. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeong C., Kim H.M., Lee S.U., Park I.J. Bilateral carpometacarpal joint dislocations of the thumb. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4:246–248. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.3.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCarley M., Foreman M. Chronic carpometacarpal dislocation of the thumb: a case report and review of the literature. JBJS Case Connect. 2018;8:49. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.17.00206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lane L.B., Henley D.H. Ligament reconstruction of the painful, unstable, nonarthritic thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:686–691. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Imaeda T., Kai-Nan A., Cooney W., Linscheid R. Anatomy of the trapeziometacarpal ligaments. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18:226–231. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90352-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bosmans B., Verhofstad M.H., Gosens T. Traumatic thumb carpometacarpal joint dislocations. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:438–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pellegrini V.D., Jr. Osteoarthritis and injury at the base of the human thumb: survival of the fittest? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:266–276. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000176968.28247.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Patel D., Dean C., Baker R.J. The hand in sports: an update on the clinical anatomy and physical examination. Prim Care. 2005;32:71–89. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2004.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alexander C., Abzug J.M., Johnson A.J., Pensy R.A., Eglseder W.A., Paryavi E. Motorcyclist's thumb: carpometacarpal injuries of the thumb sustained in motorcycle crashes. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016;41(7):707–709. doi: 10.1177/1753193415620186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lahiji F., Zandi R., Maleki A. First carpometacarpal joint dislocation and review of literatures. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2015;4:300–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shih K.S., Tsai W.F., Wu C.J., Mudgal C. Simultaneous dislocation of the carpometacarpal and metacarpophalangeal joints of the thumb in a motorcyclist. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105(8):670–673. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60167-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kose O., Keskinbora M., Guler F. Carpometacarpal dislocation of the thumb associated with fracture of the trapezium. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16(2):161–165. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0288-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Annappa R., Kotian P., Ja P., Mudiganty S. Ligamentous reconstruction of traumatic dislocation of thumb carpometacarpal joint: case report and review of literature. J Orthop Case Rep. 2015;5(4):79–81. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Messaoudi T., Errhaimini M., Ghoubach M. Floating thumb metacarpal in a motorcyclist: a case report. Chir Main. 2015;34(2):91–93. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2015.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Strauch R.J., Behrman M.J., Rosenwasser M.P. Acute dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: an anatomic and cadaver study. J Hand Surg. 1994;19A:93–98. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90229-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bettinger P.C., Linscheid R.L., Berger R.A., Cooney W.P., 3rd, An K.N. An anatomic study of the stabilizing ligaments of the trapezium and trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(4):786–798. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van Brenk B., Richards R.R., Mackay M.B., Boynton E.L. A biomechanical assessment of ligaments preventing dorsoradial subluxation of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(4):607–611. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(98)80045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colman M., Mass D.P., Draganich L.F. Effects of the deep anterior oblique and dorsoradial ligaments on trapeziometacarpal joint stability. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(3):310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wollstein R., Michael D., Harel H. Postoperative therapy for chronic thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint dislocation. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(1) doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017210. 7001350020p1-7001350020p.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Diaz-Garcia R., Waljee J.F. Current management of metacarpal fractures. Hand Clin. 2013;29(4):507–518. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aitken S., Court-Brown C.M. The epidemiology of sports-related fractures of the hand. Injury. 2008;39(12):1377–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chung K.C., Spilson S.V. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):908–915. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Onselen E.B., Karim R.B., Hage J.J. Prevalence and distribution of hand fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(5):491–495. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lutz M., Sailer R., Zimmermann R. Closed reduction transarticular Kirschner wire fixation versus open reduction internal fixation in the treatment of Bennett's fracture dislocation. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(2):142–147. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(02)00307-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Simonian P.T., Trumble T.E. Traumatic dislocation of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: early ligamentous reconstruction versus closed reduction and pinning. J Hand Surg. 1996;21A:802–806. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80195-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takwale V.J., Stanley J.K., Shahane S.A. Post-traumatic instability of the trapeziometacarpal joint of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(4):541–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shah J., Patel M. Dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a report of four cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;175:166–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eaton R.G., Littler J.W. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55-A:1655–1666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stauffer A., Schwarz Y., Uranyi M. Outcomes after thumb carpometacarpal joint stabilization with an abductor pollicis longus tendon strip for the treatment of chronic instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(2):275–282. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03302-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baker R.H., Sood M.K. A new technique of first carpometacarpal joint suspension arthroplasty with palmaris longus tendon graft. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2014;18(2):98–101. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0000000000000045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Feehan L.M., Bassett K. Is there evidence for early mobilization following an extraarticular hand fracture? J Hand Ther. 2004;17(2):300–308. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neumann D.A., Bielefeld T. The carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: stability, deformity, and therapeutic intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(7):386–399. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.7.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Owings F.P., Calandruccio J.H., Mauck B.M. Thumb ligament injuries in the athlete. Orthop Clin N Am. 2016;47(4):799–807. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lyengar K., Gandham S., Nadkarni J., Loh W. Modified eaton-littler's reconstruction for traumatic dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb-A case report and review of literature. J Hand Microsurg. 2013;5(1):36–42. doi: 10.1007/s12593-012-0067-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES