Skip to main content
Antibiotics logoLink to Antibiotics
. 2021 Apr 3;10(4):377. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10040377

Antibacterial Secondary Metabolites from Marine-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035

Fuhang Song 1,*, Rui Lin 2, Na Yang 3,4, Jia Jia 5, Shangzhu Wei 2, Jiahui Han 2, Jiangpeng Li 2, Hongkai Bi 5, Xiuli Xu 2,*
Editor: Gary A Strobel
PMCID: PMC8066187  PMID: 33916658

Abstract

Four new secondary metabolites, including one spiro[anthracenone-xanthene] derivative aspergiloxathene A (1), one penicillide analogue, Δ2′-1′-dehydropenicillide (2), and two new phthalide derivatives, 5-methyl-3-methoxyepicoccone (3) and 7-carboxy-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (4), together with four known compounds, yicathin C (5), dehydropenicillide (6), 3-methoxyepicoccone (7), 4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (8), were identified from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035. Their structures were determined by spectroscopic data, including high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS), 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques. Compound 1 was identified as the first jointed molecule by xanthene and anthracenone moieties possessing an unprecedented carbon skeleton with spiro-ring system. All compounds were evaluated activities against Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Escherichia coli, Escherichia faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Helicobacter pylori. Compound 1 showed significant inhibitory effects against S. aureus and MRSA, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 5.60 and 22.40 µM. Compounds 2 and 6 exhibited potent antibacterial activities against H. pylori, with MIC values of 21.73 and 21.61 µM, respectively.

Keywords: marine-derived fungus, Aspergillus sp., natural products, anti-Staphylococcus aureus, anti-Helicobacter pylori

1. Introduction

Overuse of antibiotics has led to the emergence and maintenance of drug resistance. The ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) pathogens are responsible for a variety of infectious diseases with a wide range of drug resistance to current clinical drugs [1]; therefore, there is urgent need to develop novel antibiotics [2,3]. Natural products have historically played an important role in the development of novel antibacterial agents [4]. Natural products characterized from marine-derived organisms are considered more and more important for drug development [5,6,7]. In recent years, more than 1000 new compounds were identified from organisms living in marine habitats per annum [8,9,10], which suggests the great potential of discovering new chemical entries from marine-derived organisms.

Fungi of the Aspergillus genus isolated from a marine environment have been proven to be rich sources for discovering new chemical entries with antibacterial and antifungal [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], inflammatory [19], antiviral [20,21], and antitumor [22,23] activities. During our ongoing search for novel bioactive secondary metabolites against bacteria and mycobacteria from marine-derived fungi, the crude extract of the fungus Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035, isolated from a sediment sample collected from the intertidal zones of the Yellow Sea in Qingdao, China, showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 25 µg/mL. Further chemical investigation on the ethyl acetate extract led to the identification of eight natural products (Figure 1), including four new secondary metabolites, aspergiloxathene A (1), Δ2′-1′-dehydropenicillide (2), 5-methyl-3-methoxyepicocc- one (3), and 7-carboxy-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (4), together with four known compounds, yicathin C (5), 1′-dehydropenicillide (6), 3-methoxyepicoccone (7), and 4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (8). To the best of our knowledge, aspergiloxathene A (1) is the first natural product with xanthene and anthracenone fragments possessing an unprecedented carbon skeleton with a spiro-ring system. Herein, we report the isolation, structural elucidation, and biological activities of these compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of 18.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Culture of Fungus and Isolation of Compounds

Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035 was inoculated into 1 L flasks with rice solid medium and incubated stationary at 28 °C for 30 days. The cultures and medium were extracted by EtOAc:MeOH and followed by a series of purification methods, such as partition, reduced normal phase silica chromatography, Sephadex LH-20 chromatography, and high-performance liquid chromatography according to our previous report [11,12] to yield compounds 18.

2.2. Structure Elucidation

Compound 1 was isolated as a light yellow powder. The molecular formula of 1 was determined to be C30H22O11 based on the high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) spectrum (m/z [M + H]+ 559.1235, calcd for C30H22O11+, 559.1235), accounting for 20 degrees of unsaturation (Supplementary Figure S1). The 1H NMR and ¹H-¹H correlation spectroscopy data of 1 (Table 1 and Supplementary Figures S2 and S5) demonstrated four aromatic signals at δH 6.28 (1H, s, H-4), 5.90 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-5), 6.19 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-7), and 6.15 (2H, s, H-2’, and H-7’); three methyl groups at δH 2.10 (3H, s, H-12) and 1.34 (6H, s, H-9’, and H-10’); and four phenolic hydroxyl groups at δH 9.90 (2H, s, 4’-OH, and 5’-OH) and 8.95 (2H, s, 3’-OH, and 6’-OH). The 13C and heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectrum of 1 (Supplementary Figures S3 and S4) indicated 30 carbons signals (Table 1) for one carbonyl at δC 190.2 (C-10); one carboxyl at δC 167.5 (C-11); five sp2 methine carbons at δC 123.5 (C-4), 111.7 (C-5), 115.5 (C-2’ and C-7’), and 101.3 (C-7); nineteen sp2 quaternary carbons at δC 165.6 (C-6), 163.3 (C-8), 156.6 (C-1), 153.5 (C-4b), 150.6 (C-4a), 144.1 (C-3’ and C-6’), 143.2 (C-3), 137.3 (C-4’a and C-4’b), 131.0 (C-4’ and C-5’), 125.9 (C-1’ and C-8’), 122.6 (C-2), 114.1 (C-8b), 117.7 (C-8’a and C-8’b), and 109.7 (C-8a); one sp3 quaternary carbon at δC 45.6 (C-9); and three methyl carbons at δC 19.9 (C-9’ and C-10’) and 19.8 (C-12). All these NMR data suggest that compound 1 contained a multihydroxyl-substituted aromatic compound. The heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) correlations (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figures S6–S8) from H-4 to C-2, C-8b, and C-12 and from H-12 to C-2, C-3, and C-4 revealed the moiety of ring A. The HMBC correlations from H-5 to C-4b, C-6, C-7, and C-8a and from H-7 to C-5, C-6, C-8, and C-8a indicated the substructure of ring B. The HMBC correlations from H-4 and H-5 to C-9 and the long-range HMBC correlations from H-4 and H-5 to C-10 suggested that ring A and ring B are connected through C-10 and C-9, as shown in Figure 2. From the integration of H-2’/H-7’, H-3’/H-6’-OH, H-4’/H-5’-OH, and H-9’ and H-10’, moiety C was deduced as a symmetric substructure. The key HMBC correlations from H-2’/H-7’ to C-3’/C-6’, C-4’/C-5’, C-8’b/C-8’a, and C-9’/C-10’ and from H-9’/H-10’ to C-1’/C-8’, C-2’/C-7’, and C-8’b/C-8’a indicated the presence of moiety C. The long-range HMBC correlations from H-2’/H-7’ to C-9 suggested the connections of C-9 to C-8’a and C-8’b. The HMBC crossing peaks from H-3’-OH/H-6’-OH to C-2’/C-7’, C-3’/C-6’, and C-4’/C-5’ and from H-4’-OH/H-5’-OH to C-3’/C-6’, C-4’/C-5’, and C-4a’/C-4b’ revealed the positions of the hydroxyl groups of substructure C. The two rings of the xanthene fragment showed symmetry through a plane of the anthracenone fragment by running Minimize Energy in ChemBio 3D, which was consisted with the zero of optical rotation for 1. As a result, the structure of compound 1 was assigned as shown in Figure 1 and named as aspergiloxathene A.

Table 1.

1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data of 1 and 2.

Position 1 (DMSO-d6) Position 2 (CDCl3)
δC, Type δH (J in Hz) δC, Type δH (J in Hz)
1 156.6, C 1 118.0, CH 6.94 (d, J = 8.5 Hz)
2 122.6, C 2 134.8, CH 7.72 (d, J = 8.5 Hz)
3 143.2, C 3 134.0, C
4 123.5, CH 6.28 (s) 4 156.9, C
4a 150.6, C 4a 121.6, C
4b 153.5, C 5 166.4, C
5 111.7, CH 5.90 (d, J = 2.0 Hz) 7 69.1, CH2 5.11 (s)
6 165.6, C 7a 125.9, C
7 101.3, CH 6.19 (d, J = 2.0 Hz) 8 121.2, CH 6.40 (s)
8 163.3, C 9 135.6, C
8a 109.7, C 10 117.8, CH 6.87 (s)
8b 114.1, C 11 147.4, C
9 45.6, C 11a 141.0, C
10 190.2, C 12a 154.0, C
11 167.5, C 13 64.3, CH3 3.91 (s)
12 19.8, CH3 2.10 (s) 1’ 190.7, C
1’/8’ 125.9, C 2’ 124.1, CH 6.66 (s)
2’/7’ 115.5, CH 6.15 (s) 3’ 158.8, C
3’/6’ 144.1, C 4’ 21.7, CH3 2.26 (s)
4’/5’ 131.0, C 5’ 28.3, CH3 2.01 (s)
4’a/4’b 137.3, C 1’’ 21.0, CH3 2.25 (s)
8’a/8’b 117.7, C
9’/10’ 19.9, CH3 1.34 (s)
3’/6’-OH 8.95 (s)
4’/5’-OH 9.00 (s)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

¹H-¹H correlation spectroscopy (¹H-¹H COSY) and key heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) correlations of 14.

Compound 2 was isolated as a light yellow powder. The molecular formula of 1 was determined to be C21H20O6 based on the HRESIMS spectrum (m/z [M + H]+ 369.1330, calcd for C21H21O6+, 369.1333), accounting for twelve degrees of unsaturation (Supplementary Figure S10). The 1H NMR data of 2 (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S11) demonstrated two ortho aromatic signals at δH 6.94 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-1) and 7.72 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2), two singlet aromatic protons at δH 6.40 (1H, s, H-8) and 6.87 (1H, s, H-10), and one olefinic proton at δH 6.66 (1H, s, H-2’). In addition, one oxygenated methylene at δH 5.11 (2H, brs, H-7); one methoxyl group at δH 3.91 (3H, s, H-13); and three methyl groups at δH 2.26 (3H, s, H-4’), 2.01 (3H, s, H-5’), and 2.25 (3H, s, H-1’’) were observed in the proton spectrum. The 13C and HSQC spectrum of 2 (Supplementary Figures S12 and S13) showed 21 carbons signals (Table 1), including one carbonyl at δC 190.7 (C-1’); one carboxyl at δC 166.4 (C-5); five sp2 methine carbons at δC 118.0 (C-1), 134.8 (C-2), 121.2 (C-8), 117.8 (C-10), and 124.1 (C-2’); nine sp2 quaternary carbons at δC 134.0 (C-3), 156.9 (C-4), 121.6 (C-4a), 125.9 (C-7a), 135.6 (C-9), 147.4 (C-11), 141.0 (C-11a), 154.0 (C-12a), and 158.8 (C-3’); one oxygenated methylene carbon at δC 69.1 (C-7); one methoxyl carbon at δC 64.3 (C-13); and three methyl carbons at δC 21.7 (C-4’), 28.3 (C-5’), and 21.0 (C-1’’). A detailed analysis of the 1D and 2D NMR data (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figures S11–S15) indicated that 2 is an analogue of penicillide [24]. In the HMBC spectra, the correlations from H-4’ and H-5’ to C-2’ (δC 124.1) and C-3’ (δC 158.8) and from H-2’ to C-4’ and C-5’ revealed the double bond of C-2’ and C-3’. Additionally, the HMBC correlations from H-2 and H-2’ to C-1’ (δC 190.7) indicated the presence of carbonyl at C-1’. Thus, the structure of compound 2 was designed as in Figure 1 and named Δ2′-1′-dehydropenicillide.

Compound 3 was isolated as a colorless powder. The molecular formula of 3 was determined to be C11H12O6 based on the HRESIMS spectrum (m/z [M + H]+ 241.0705, calcd for C11H13O6+, 241.0707), accounting for six degrees of unsaturation (Supplementary Figure S17). The 1H NMR data of 3 (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S18) displayed one methine proton at δH 6.31 (1H, s, H-3), one methyl group at δH 2.31 (3H, H-10), and two methoxyl groups at δH 3.40 (3H, s, H-8) and 3.74 (1H, s, H-9) as well as two protons for hydroxyl groups at δH 9.71 (1H, s, 4-OH) and 9.33 (1H, s, 6-OH). The 13C and HSQC spectrum of 1 (Supplementary Figures S19 and S20) showed 11 carbon signals (Table 2), including one carboxyl at δC 168.7 (C-1); one acetal signal at δC 100.5 (C-3); six aromatic quaternary carbons at 122.5 (C-3a), 144.0 (C-4), 141.0 (C-5), 151.1 (C-6), 116.1 (C-7), and 119.0 (C-7a); one methyl group at δC 9.5 (C-10); and two methoxyl groups at δC 55.2 (C-8) and 60.3 (C-9). The NMR data revealed the phthalide analogue for compound 3. The key HMBC correlations (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S21) from H-3 to C-8 and H-8 to C-3 revealed the methoxyl group at C-3. Additionally, the HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-1, C-4, and C-7a demonstrated the lactone from C-7a, through C-1/O-2/C-3, to C-3a. The hydroxyl groups at C-4 and C-6 were identified by HMBC correlations from H-4-OH to C-3a, C-4, and C-5 and from H-6-OH to C-5, C-6, and C-7. The methyl group at C-10 was confirmed by HMBC correlations from H-10 to C-6, C-7, and C-7a. The HMBC cross peak from H-9 to C-5 revealed the methoxyl group at C-9 attached to C-5. From the optical rotation, we used c 0.05 in MeOH, and as the data undulated near zero, we could not establish if it was an enantiomeric or racemic form. Based on the analogue of 3-methoxyepicoccone [25], compound 3 was named 5-methyl-3-methoxyepicoccone.

Table 2.

1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of 3 and 4.

Position 3 (DMSO-d6) 4 (DMSO-d6)
δC, Type δH (J in Hz) δC, Type δH (J in Hz)
1 168.7, C 168.8, C
3 100.5, CH 6.31 (s) 68.0, CH2 5.26 (s)
3a 122.5, C 119.8, C
4 144.0, C 150.7, C
5 141.0, C 124.8, C
6 151.1, C 155.9, C
7 116.1, C 118.7, C
7a 119.0, C 128.8, C
8 55.2, CH3 3.40 (s) 9.8, CH3 2.16 (s)
9 60.3, CH3 3.74 (s) 61.8, CH3 3.73 (s)
10 9.5, CH3 2.31 (s) 166.4, C
4-OH 9.71 (s)
6-OH 9.33 (s)

Compound 4 was isolated as a colorless powder. The molecular formula of 4 was determined to be C11H10O6 based on the HRESIMS spectrum (m/z [M + H]+ 239.0554, calcd for C11H11O6+, 239.0550), accounting for seven degrees of unsaturation (Supplementary Figure S23). The 1H NMR data of 4 (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S24) displayed one oxygenated methylene group at δH 5.26 (2H, s, H-3), one methyl group at δH 2.16 (3H, H-8), and one methoxyl groups at δH 3.73 (3H, s, H-9). The 13C and HSQC spectrum of 1 (Supplementary Figures S25 and S26) showed 11 carbons signals (Table 2), including two carboxyl groups at δC 168.8 (C-1) and 166.4 (C-10); one oxygenated methylene group at δC 68.0 (C-3); six quaternary carbons at 119.8 (C-3a), 150.7 (C-4), 124.8 (C-5), 155.9 (C-6), 118.7 (C-7), and 128.8 (C-7a); one methyl group at δC 9.8 (C-8); and one methoxyl group at δC 61.8 (C-9). In combination with the HMBC correlations (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S27) from H-3 to C-1, C-4, and C-7a; from H-8 to C-4, C-5, and C-6; and from H-9 to C-6, compound 4 was identified as an analogue of phthalide [25] and named 7-carboxy-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide.

Four known secondary metabolites were isolated from Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035, with three of them identified as yicathin C (5) [26], 3-methoxyepicoccone (7) [27], 4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (8) [28], by comparing the spectroscopic data with each of the reported data. 1′-dehydroxypenicillide (6) was characterized by comparing the spectroscopic data with the reported structure and related analogues [24,29].

2.3. Biological Activity

All of the compounds were subjected to antibacterial assays against S. aureus ATCC 25923, methicillin-resistant S. aureus USA300, E. coli ATCC 11775, E. faecium ATCC 19434, P. aeruginosa PAO1, and H. pylori G27. Compound 1 exhibited significant antibacterial activities against S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), with MIC values of 5.60 and 22.40 mM, respectively (positive control, vancomycin, MIC = 0.35 mM). The compounds containing xanthone or anthracenone moieties showed antibacterial activities against a panel of pathogens [13,30,31]. Compound 1 was the first natural product containing a specific carbon skeleton with a spiro-ring system of xanthene and anthracenone, which may offer the antibacterial activities against drug-sensitive and -resistant S. aureus strains. Compounds 2 and 6 exhibited potent antibacterial activities against H. pylori, with MIC values of 21.73 and 21.61 mM, respectively (positive control, metronidazole, MIC = 11.68 mM).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations ([α]D) were recorded on an Anton Paar MCP 200 Modular Circular Polarimeter (Austria) in a 100 × 2 mm cell at 22 °C. One-dimensional and two-dimensional NMR spectra were measured at 25 °C using a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer with residual solvent peaks as references (DMSO-d6: δH 2.50, δC 39.52; CDCl3: δH 7.26, δC 77.16). high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) measurements were obtained on an Accurate-Mass-Q-TOF LC/MS 6520 instrument (Santa Clara, CA, USA) in positive ion mode. HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC System equipped with a diode array detector, a fraction collector, and an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 µm).

3.2. Microbial Material

Strain IMCAS180035 was isolated from a mud sample collected from the intertidal zones of the Yellow Sea in Qingdao, China, and grown on a potato dextrose agar plate at 28 °C. This strain was identified as Aspergillus sp. based on gene sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (Supplementary Figure S29) using a conventional primer pair of ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′). The strain was deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC No. 3.20170), Beijing, China, with the GenBank (NCBI) accession number MW015145.

3.3. Fermentation, Extraction, and Purification

The spore of Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035 stored in −80 °C was inoculated on a potato dextrose agar plate and incubated at 28 °C for 7 days; then, the fungal colony was cut into 1 cm2 with a sterilized knife and placed into ten 1 L conical flasks, each containing a solid medium consisting of 200 g of rice and 150 mL of distilled water. The inoculated flasks were incubated stationary at 28 °C for 30 days. The cultures and medium of Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035 were extracted three times by EtOAc:MeOH (80:20), and the combined extracts were reduced to dryness in vacuo to yield brown residue. The residue was resuspended into 500 mL of distilled water and partitioned by EtOAc. Then, the EtOAc layer was dried in vacuo to yield a dark residue (4.68 g). The EtOAc fraction was subjected to reduced pressure silica gel chromatography (50 × 70 mm column, TLC H silica) using a stepwise gradient of 80–100% hexane/CH2Cl2 and then 0–90% MeOH/CH2Cl2 to afford 15 fractions. Fraction F was purified on a Sephadex LH-20 column using an elution of CH2Cl2:MeOH (2:1) to give five subfractions, and F3 was further separated by HPLC (Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8, 250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm column, 3.0 mL/min), eluting with 75% MeOH/H2O to yield compound 6 (3.2 mg). Fraction G was fractionated on a Sephadex LH-20 column using an elution of CH2Cl2:MeOH (2:1) to give four subfractions (G1–G4). G2 was further purified by HPLC (Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8, 250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm column, 3.0 mL/min), eluting by 70% MeOH/H2O to yield compounds 2 (1.5 mg), 3 (1.2 mg), and 7 (1.0 mg). Fraction J was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column using an elution of CH2Cl2:MeOH (2:1) to give nine subfractions (J1–J9). J8 was further fractionated by HPLC (Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8, 250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm column, 3.0 mL/min), eluting with 65% MeOH/H2O to yield compounds 4 (1.1 mg) and 8 (2.3 mg). Fraction N was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column using an elution of CH2Cl2:MeOH (2:1) to give ten subfractions (N1–N10). N8 was further purified by HPLC (Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8, 250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm column, 3.0 mL/min), eluting by 65% MeOH/H2O to yield compounds 1 (2.1 mg) and 5 (5.1 mg). All the new compounds were analyzed at the same condition to check the purity and compare the retention time (Supplementary Figures S9, S16, S22 and S28).

3.3.1. Aspergiloxathene A (1)

Aspergiloxathene A (1): Light yellow powder; 1H and 13C NMR data, Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 559.1235 [M + H]+ (calcd C30H22O11, 559.1235).

3.3.2. Δ2′-1′-dehydropenicillide (2)

Δ2′-1′-dehydropenicillide (2): Light yellow powder; 1H and 13C NMR data, Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 369.1330 [M + H]+ (calcd for C21H21O6, 369.1333).

3.3.3. 5-methyl-3-methoxyepicoccone (3)

5-methyl-3-methoxyepicoccone (3): Colorless powder; 1H and 13C NMR data, Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 241.0705 [M + H]+ (calcd for C30H23O11, C11H13O6, 241.0707).

3.3.4. 7-carboxy-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (4)

7-carboxy-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (4): Colorless powder; 1H and 13C NMR data, Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 239.0554 [M + H]+ (calcd for C11H11O6, 239.0550).

3.4. Antibacterial Activity Assays

The microbial inhibition assays were carried out according to the Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M07-A7 (CLSI) [32] by using a penal of pathogens of S. aureus ATCC 25923, MRSA USA300, E. coli ATCC 11775, E. faecium ATCC 19434, P. aeruginosa PAO1, and H. pylori G27. Briefly, the bacteria (S. aureus, MRSA, E. coli, E. faecium, and P. aeruginosa) were taken out from glycerol stocks and inoculated on lysogeny broth (LB) agar plate and cultured overnight at 37 °C. Then, single colonies were picked from the agar plates and adjusted to approximately 104 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL with Mueller–Hinton Broth. Two microliters of 2-fold serial dilution of each compound (in DMSO) were added to each row on a 96-well microplate containing 100 μL of bacterial suspension in each well. Vancomycin and ciprofloxacin were used as positive controls, and DMSO was used as a negative control. The 96-well plate was incubated at 37 °C aerobically for 24 h. Anti-H. pylori (G27) was prepared in a 96-well microtiter plate containing 100 µL of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Metronidazole was used as a positive control. The liquid culture of 2-day-old H. pylori was diluted 10 times in BHI broth to yield a final concentration of 5 × 105 to 1 × 106 CFU/mL. Two microliters of 2-fold serial dilution of each compound (in DMSO) were added into each well of the testing plates. The testing plates were incubated in a microaerophilic atmosphere at 37 °C for 3 days. The MIC was determined to be the lowest concentration, which resulted in no visible turbidity [33,34].

4. Conclusions

This study reported the chemical investigation on the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. IMCASMF180035, which resulted in the isolation and characterization of eight natural products, including one dimeric anthroquinone, aspergiloxathene A (1); one penicillide analogue, Δ2′-1′-dehydropenicillide (2); and two new phthalide derivatives, 5-methyl-3-methoxyepicoccone (3) and 7-carboxy-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (4), together with four known compounds, yicathin C (5), 1′-dehydropenicillide (6), 3-methoxyepicoccone (7), and 4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-methylphthalide (8). To our best knowledge, compound 1 was the first natural structure with xanthene and anthracenone moieties with an unprecedented carbon skeleton with a spiro-ring system. All the isolated compounds were evaluated against a panel of bacteria, such as S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, E. coli, E. faecium, P. aeruginos, and H. pylori. Compound 1 displayed potential antibacterial activity against S. aureus and MRSA, with MIC values of 5.60 and 22.40 mM, respectively. The difference in MICs between S. aureus and MRSA may due to the broad spectrum drug resistance of MRSA strain USA 300 to different classes of antibiotics, such as erythromycin, levofloxacin, clindamycin, tetracycline, and azithromycin [35,36]. Compounds 2 and 6 exhibited moderate antibacterial activities against H. pylori, with MIC values of 21.73 and 21.61 mM, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10040377/s1, Figures S1–S28: HRESIMS, 1D and 2D NMR, and HPLC profile for compounds 14, Figure S29: Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of IMCASMF180035.

Author Contributions

Data curation, F.S., R.L., N.Y., J.J., S.W., J.H., J.L., H.B., and X.X.; funding acquisition, F.S.; investigation, F.S., R.L., N.Y., J.J., S.W., J.H., J.L., H.B., and X.X.; supervision, F.S. and X.X.; writing—original draft, F.S.; writing—review and editing, F.S., R.L., N.Y., J.J., S.W., J.H., J.L., H.B., and X.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0311000), the Key Lab of Marine Bioactive Substance and Modern Analytical Technique, SOA (MBSMAT-2019-06), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973204), and Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Beijing Technology and Business University (No. 19008020158).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Boucher H.W., Talbot G.H., Bradley J.S., Edwards J.E., Gilbert D., Rice L.B., Scheld M., Spellberg B., Bartlett J. Bad bugs, no drugs: No ESKAPE! an update from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009;48:1–12. doi: 10.1086/595011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumarasamy K.K., Toleman M.A., Walsh T.R., Bagaria J., Butt F., Balakrishnan R., Chaudhary U., Doumith M., Giske C.G., Irfan S., et al. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: A molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2010;10:597–602. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70143-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang Y., Zhang R., Li J., Wu Z., Yin W., Schwarz S., Tyrrell J.M., Zheng Y., Wang S., Shen Z., et al. Comprehensive resistome analysis reveals the prevalence of NDM and MCR-1 in Chinese poultry production. Nat. Microbiol. 2017;2:16260. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moloney M.G. Natural products as a source for novel antibiotics. Trends. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016;37:689–701. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Molinski T.F., Dalisay D.S., Lievens S.L., Saludes J.P. Drug development from marine natural products. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2009;8:69–85. doi: 10.1038/nrd2487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shinde P., Banerjee P., Mandhare A. Marine natural products as source of new drugs: A patent review (2015–2018) Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2019;29:283–309. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2019.1598972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wiese J., Imhoff J.F. Marine bacteria and fungi as promising source for new antibiotics. Drug Develop. Res. 2019;80:24–27. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blunt J.W., Carroll A.R., Copp B.R., Davis R.A., Keyzers R.A., Prinsep M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018;35:8–53. doi: 10.1039/C7NP00052A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carroll A.R., Copp B.R., Davis R.A., Keyzers R.A., Prinsep M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019;36:122–173. doi: 10.1039/C8NP00092A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carroll A.R., Copp B.R., Davis R.A., Keyzers R.A., Prinsep M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020;37:175–223. doi: 10.1039/C9NP00069K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Song F., Liu X., Guo H., Ren B., Chen C., Piggott A., Yu K., Gao H., Wang Q., Liu M., et al. Brevianamides with antitubercular potential from a marine-derived isolate of Aspergillus versicolor. Org. lett. 2012;14:4770–4773. doi: 10.1021/ol302051x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Song F., Ren B., Chen C., Yu K., Liu X., Zhang Y., Yang N., He H., Liu X., Dai H., et al. Three new sterigmatocystin analogues from marine-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor MF359. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2014;98:3753–3758. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5409-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song Z., Gao J., Hu J., He H., Huang P., Zhang L., Song F. One new xanthenone from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor MF160003. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019;34:2907–2912. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2019.1597355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.An C.L., Kong F.D., Ma Q.Y., Xie Q.Y., Yuan J.Z., Zhou L.M., Dai H.F., Yu Z.F., Zhao Y.X. Chemical constituents of the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. SCS-KFD66. Mar. Drugs. 2018;16:468. doi: 10.3390/md16120468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li D., Xu Y., Shao C.L., Yang R.Y., Zheng C.J., Chen Y., Fu X.M., Qian P.Y., She Z.G., de Voogd N.J., et al. Antibacterial bisabolane-type sesquiterpenoids from the sponge-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. Mar. Drugs. 2012;10:234–241. doi: 10.3390/md10010234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prompanya C., Dethoup T., Bessa L.J., Pinto M.M., Gales L., Costa P.M., Silva A.M., Kijjoa A. New isocoumarin derivatives and meroterpenoids from the marine sponge-associated fungus Aspergillus similanensis sp. nov. KUFA 0013. Mar. Drugs. 2014;12:5160–5173. doi: 10.3390/md12105160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu J.S., Shi X.H., Yao G.S., Shao C.L., Fu X.M., Zhang X.L., Guan H.S., Wang C.Y. New thiodiketopiperazine and 3,4-dihydroisocoumarin derivatives from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus. Mar. Drugs. 2020;18:132. doi: 10.3390/md18030132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ding L., Ren L., Li S., Song J., Han Z., He S., Xu S. Production of new antibacterial 4-hydroxy-α-pyrones by a marine fungus Aspergillus niger cultivated in solid medium. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17:344. doi: 10.3390/md17060344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Choi B.K., Cho D.Y., Choi D.K., Trinh P.T.H., Shin H.J. Two new phomaligols from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus flocculosus and their anti-neuroinflammatory activity in BV-2 microglial cells. Mar. Drugs. 2021;19:65. doi: 10.3390/md19020065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Z., Jia J., Wang L., Li F., Wang Y., Jiang Y., Song X., Qin S., Zheng K., Ye J., et al. Anti-HSV-1 activity of Aspergillipeptide D, a cyclic pentapepetide isolated from fungus Aspergillus sp. SCSIO 41501. Virol. J. 2020;17:41. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01315-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ding Y., Zhu X., Hao L., Zhao M., Hua Q., An F. Bioactive indolyl diketopiperazines from the marine derived endophytic Aspergillus versicolor DY180635. Mar. Drugs. 2020;18:338. doi: 10.3390/md18070338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu Y.F., Yue Y.F., Feng L.X., Zhu H.J., Cao F. Asperienes A-D, bioactive sesquiterpenes from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus flavus. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17:550. doi: 10.3390/md17100550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bae S.Y., Liao L., Park S.H., Kim W.K., Shin J., Lee S.K. Antitumor activity of Asperphenin A, a lipopeptidyl benzophenone from marine-derived Aspergillus sp. fungus, by inhibiting yubulin polymerization in colon cancer cells. Mar. Drugs. 2020;18:110. doi: 10.3390/md18020110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Komai S.I., Hosoe T., Itabashi T., Nozawa K., Yaguchi T., Fukushima K., Kawai K.I. New penicillide derivatives isolated from Penicillium simplicissimum. J. Nat. Med. 2006;60:185–190. doi: 10.1007/s11418-005-0028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.El Amrani M., Lai D., Debbab A., Aly A.H., Siems K., Seidel C., Schnekenburger M., Gaigneaux A., Diederich M., Feger D., et al. Protein kinase and HDAC inhibitors from the endophytic fungus Epicoccum nigrum. J. Nat. Prod. 2014;77:49–56. doi: 10.1021/np4005745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun R.R., Miao F.P., Zhang J., Wang G., Yin X.L., Ji N.Y. Three new xanthone derivatives from an algicolous isolate of Aspergillus wentii. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2013;51:65–68. doi: 10.1002/mrc.3903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Achenbach H., Mühlenfeld A., Brillinger G.U. Phthalide und chromanole aus Aspergillus duricaulis. Liebigs Ann. der Chem. 1985;1985:1596–1628. doi: 10.1002/jlac.198519850808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li W., Yang X., Yang Y., Duang R., Chen G., Li X., Li Q., Qin S., Li S., Zhao L., et al. Anti-phytopathogen, multi-target acetylcholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of metabolites from endophytic Chaetomium globosum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016;30:2616–2619. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1129328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Salituro G.M., Pettibone D.J., Clineschmidt B.V., Williamson J.M., Zink D.L. Potent, non-peptidic oxytocin receptor antagonists from a natural source. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993;3:337–340. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80905-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Loureiro D.R.P., Soares J.X., Costa J.C., Magalhaes A.F., Azevedo C.M.G., Pinto M.M.M., Afonso C.M.M. Structures, activities and drug-likeness of anti-infective xanthone derivatives isolated from the marine environment: A Review. Molecules. 2019;24:243. doi: 10.3390/molecules24020243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coopoosamy R.M., Magwa M.L. Antibacterial activity of aloe emodin and aloin A isolated from Aloe excelsa. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006;5:1092–1094. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, Approved Standard. 7th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA, USA: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Han J., Yang N., Wei S., Jia J., Lin R., Li J., Bi H., Song F., Xu X. Dimeric hexylitaconic acids from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus welwitschiae CUGBMF180262. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2020.1793152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang Y., Hang X., Jiang X., Zeng L., Jia J., Xie Y., Li F., Bi H. In vitro and in vivo activities of zinc linolenate, a selective antibacterial agent against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2019;63:e00004-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00004-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mnyambwa N.P., Mahende C., Wilfred A., Sandi E., Mgina N., Lubinza C., Kahwa A., Petrucka P., Mfinanga S., Ngadaya E., et al. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from routine clinical specimens from Referral Hospitals in Tanzania: A prospective hospital-based observational study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021;4:869–878. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S294575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Luna V.A., Xu Z.Q., Eiznhamer D.A., Cannons A.C., Cattani J. Susceptibility of 170 isolates of the USA300 clone of MRSA to macrolides, clindamycin and the novel ketolide cethromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008;62:639–940. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the text.


Articles from Antibiotics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES