Skip to main content
Neural Regeneration Research logoLink to Neural Regeneration Research
. 2020 Oct 9;16(4):653–658. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.295341

Neurons derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells express mu and kappa opioid receptors

Zhi-Hai Ju 1, Xuan Liang 1, Yao-Yao Ren 1, Luo-Wa Shu 1, Yan-Hong Yan 1, Xu Cui 1,*
PMCID: PMC8067944  PMID: 33063716

graphic file with name NRR-16-653-g001.jpg

Keywords: brain, cells, factor, in vivo, neural differentiation, protein, stem cells, stroke

Abstract

Neuroprotection studies have shown that induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have the possibility to transform neuroprotection research. In the present study, iPS cells were generated from human renal epithelial cells and were then differentiated into neurons. Cells in the iPS-cell group were maintained in stem cell medium. In contrast, cells in the iPS-neuron group were first maintained in neural induction medium and expansion medium containing ROCK inhibitors, and then cultivated in neuronal differentiation medium and neuronal maturation medium to induce the neural stem cells to differentiate into neurons. The expression of relevant markers was compared at different stages of differentiation. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that cells in the iPS-neuron group expressed the neural stem cell markers SOX1 and nestin on day 11 of induction, and neuronal markers TUBB3 and NeuN on day 21 of induction. Polymerase chain reaction results demonstrated that, compared with the iPS-cell group, TUBB3 gene expression in the iPS-neuron group was increased 15.6-fold. Further research revealed that, compared with the iPS-cell group, the gene expression and immunoreactivity of mu opioid receptor in the iPS-neuron group were significantly increased (38.3-fold and 5.7-fold, respectively), but those of kappa opioid receptor had only a slight change (1.33-fold and 1.57-fold increases, respectively). Together, these data indicate that human iPS cells can be induced into mu opioid receptor- and kappa opioid receptor-expressing neurons, and that they may be useful to simulate human opioid receptor function in vitro and explore the underlying mechanisms of human conditions.


Chinese Library Classification No. R459.9; R363; R364

Introduction

Cerebral ischemic/hypoxic injury is a common pathophysiological process in ischemic stroke (Yu et al., 2019; Bae et al., 2020). Reperfusion injury after thrombolytic therapy is accompanied by high morbidity and mortality, and can further aggravate brain injury. An effective treatment is currently lacking (Catanese et al., 2017). Recent studies have reported that opioid agonists can produce different degrees of neuroprotection (Chunhua et al., 2014; Meng et al., 2016; Gui et al., 2017). Morphine is a classic representative of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists that is commonly used in the clinic. It exerts neuroprotection through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, protein kinases C membrane translocation, and miR-134 expression (Liu et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2011; Meng et al., 2016). Other non-opioid receptor agonists, such as Salvinorin A, reduce mortality and improve neurological developmental outcomes in neonatal mouse hypoxia models (Chen et al., 2014). Herkinorin, a semi-synthetic opioid receptor agonist, provides neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice by inducing cPKCγ membrane translocation (Gui et al., 2017). Together, these findings suggest that opioid receptor activation plays an important role in neuroprotection (Dong et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019).

The opioid system is involved in the modulation of various physiological and pathological responses, including antinociception, neuroprotection, behavior and memory regulation, drug addiction, thermosensation, respiratory depression, immunoreaction, and ion channel functions (Macey et al., 2010; Shapovalov et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2016; Roeckel et al., 2016; Darcq and Kieffer, 2018; Gupta et al., 2018; Melo et al., 2018; Pellissier et al., 2018). Hypoxia-induced and agonist-mediated opioid internalization can be inhibited by opioid antagonists (Hill and Walsh, 2005). Our previous study revealed that oxygen/glucose deprivation for 1 hour, which mimics hypoxia, induces reversible opioid internalization in murine Neuro-2A (N2A) cells (Xi et al., 2017). Cell and animal experiments have suggested that opioid activation has possible neuroprotective effects (Beevers et al., 2013; Eigentler et al., 2013).

Much of our understanding about the mechanisms governing brain development and function in primates comes from research using a few models that are relatively distantly related to humans. However, there are many species differences in the proportions of opioid subtype binding sites in the mammalian brain. In the guinea pig brain, the proportion of opioid binding sites was reported as 24% mu, 32% delta, and 44% kappa. In rabbits, the proportions were 43% mu, 19% delta, and 37% kappa, while in rats, they were 51% mu, 29% delta, and 20% kappa (Robson et al., 1985). There are also many central nervous system differences between primates and rodents. Humans have detailed neuronal connections, with the immense complexity of the human connectome. The genetic and molecular mechanisms of human brain evolution are also very different from that of rodents (Hill and Walsh, 2005; Rakic, 2009; Sousa et al., 2017). Experimental, ethical, and legal limitations have hindered research on the human brain. However, whether animal models can mimic human diseases is highly controversial (Drake, 2013).

The use of human-derived cells to investigate mechanisms of the disease may allow for the clinical transformation of relevant theories. The emergence of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells has injected vitality into the study of regenerative medicine, disease model establishment, and drug and toxicity screening (Lancaster et al., 2013; Kikuchi et al., 2017). Using human iPS cells to establish a model to explore human diseases allows both the identification of disease mechanisms and the performance of drug screening. Few studies have investigated the neuroprotective mechanisms of human iPS-derived differentiated neural cells (De Filippis et al., 2016). In a previous study, we successfully constructed iPS cell lines using human urinary exfoliated epithelial cells (Wang et al., 2016; Ju et al., 2017). Here, we aimed to induce neuronal differentiation of human iPS cells and to detect whether these neurons express opioid receptors, which will be important for subsequent studies of human opioid function.

Materials and Methods

Cells

We used human urine-derived iPS cells reprogrammed through an episomal system, which were generated in Beijing Cellapy Biotechnology Co., Ltd., as detailed in our previous reports (Wang et al., 2016; Ju et al., 2017). All six donors in the study signed a consent form that was available as a requirement for human studies. The undifferentiated iPS cells were cultured for further study in Essential 8™ Medium (A1517001, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2 with 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Differentiation of iPS cells into neural stem cells

For the iPS-cell group, the cells were maintained in Essential 8™ Medium (A1517001; Thermo Fisher) to maintain an undifferentiated state. For the iPS-neuron group, the iPS cells were digested with accutase when their confluence was approximately 85%. After centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in neural induction medium (05835; Stemcell, Vancouver, Canada) and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632 was added (Y0503; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were then plated at a density of 4–5 × 106 onto AggreWell (Stemcell, Shanghai, China), centrifuged, and incubated. For the next 4 days, the cultivating medium was half exchanged every day. On day 5, the spheres on AggreWell were attached to the cell culture plate and neural induction medium (05835; Stemcell) was added to start the induction process, with a medium change every 2 days. On day 11, rosettes were chosen to plate, and these were continued to be cultured in the neural stem cell expansion medium (iNM-001; CIB, Shenzhen, China). This step was repeated if necessary. When the rosettes were sufficiently amplified, they were digested with accutase and dispase to obtain neural stem cells (NSCs), and were then plated with neural stem cell expansion medium (iNM-001; CIB) for further amplification.

Differentiation of NSCs into neurons

The cells in the iPS-cell group were continuously maintained in an undifferentiated state using Essential 8™ Medium. In the iPS-neuron group, when the NSCs reached a confluence of approximately 100%, they were digested using accutase. After centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in neuronal differentiation medium (08500; Stemcell) and seeded onto the plate, and the medium was replaced every 2 days for the next week. On day 8, cells were digested with accutase, centrifuged, and resuspended in neuronal maturation medium (iNM-007A, CIB) to begin the maturation process. The medium was replaced every 2 days. On day 21, cells were fixed for immunofluorescence.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Next, cells were treated with a blocking solution, comprising PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin, and were then permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes at room temperature. The following primary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridgeshire, UK) were diluted in blocking solution and incubated at 4°C overnight: anti-Oct4 (mouse anti-Oct4 monoclonal antibody, ab184665; 1:1000), anti-SOX1 (rabbit anti-SOX1 polyclonal antibody, ab87775; 1:500), anti-nestin (rabbit anti-nestin polyclonal antibody, ab92391; 1:250), anti-OPRK1 (rabbit anti-ku opiod receptor [KOR] polyclonal antibody, ab113533; 1:1000), anti-OPRM1 (rabbit anti-MOR polyclonal antibody, ab10275; 1:1000), anti-TUBB3 (mouse anti-beta III tubulin monoclonal antibody, ab78078; 1:1000), and anti-NeuN (rabbit anti-NeuN polyclonal antibody, ab104225; 1:500). After washing with PBS, secondary antibodies were added and incubated at room temperature in a dark box for 1 hour. Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (A0423; 1:500), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L), and Cy3-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (A0516; 1:500) were purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Nuclei were labeled with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; C1005; Beyotime). Mean fluorescence intensity (i.e., integrated density/area) was calculated using ImageJ 1.52q software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) according to the software instructions. At least 50 cells from three separate experiments were counted.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis

The primers used for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction system are listed in Table 1. The PCR conditions were 95°C for 60 seconds followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 34 seconds. Melting curves were obtained for each of the genes. PCR was performed on an ABI PCR system (ABI 7500; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The average cycle threshold (Ct) values of tested genes were calculated against average glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) Ct values from the same sample. ?Ct = Ct (tested gene) – Ct (GAPDH), and ??Ct = ?Ct (iPS-neuron group) – ?Ct (iPS-cell group). The fold changes of gene transcript levels of MOR, KOR, MAP2, and TUBB3 between the two groups were calculated as 2–ΔΔCt (Wang et al., 2016).

Table 1.

Primers used for qPCR

Gene Sequence (5′–3′) Product size (bp)
KOR Forward: ATC ATC ACG GCG GTC TAC TC 20
Reverse: ACT CTG AAA GGG CAT GGT TGT A 22
MOR Forward: GCC CTT CCA GAG TGT GAA TTA C 22
Reverse: GTG CAG AGG GTG AAT ATG CTG 21
MAP2 Forward: CGA AGC GCC AAT GGA TTC C 19
Reverse: TGA ACT ATC CTT GCA GAC ACC T 22
TUBB3 Forward: GGC CAA GGG TCA CTA CAC G 19
Reverse: GCA GTC GCA GTT TTC ACA CTC 21
GAPDH Forward: GTG GAC CTG ACC TGC CGT CT 20
Reverse: GGA GGA GTG GGT GTC GCT GT 20

Statistical analysis

Results are given as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and the unpaired Student’s t-test was used for data analysis. All histograms were plotted using GraphPad Prism 7 software (version 7.0a, San Diego, CA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Culture of human urine-derived iPS cells

The iPS cells cultured in stem cell medium had a high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio and tightly packed colonies with defined borders (Figure 1). Immunofluorescence staining confirmed expression of the human pluripotency-associated marker Oct4, and karyotype analysis of iPS cells in our previous report (Wang et al., 2016) revealed a normal karyotype of 24 chromosomes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Morphology and characterization of iPS cells cultured for 5 days.

(A) iPS cell morphology, with a high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio and tightly packed colonies with defined borders. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining shows the expression of pluripotency-associated marker Oct4 in iPS cells. Scale bar: 50 μm. iPS cells: Induced pluripotent stem cells; Oct4: octamer-binding transcription factor 4.

Generation of NSCs from iPS cells

To derive early-stage NSCs from iPS cells, we differentiated iPS cells into NSCs using a monolayer culture protocol. Differentiation was carried out in a defined, serum-free medium for the neural induction of iPS cells by blocking TGF-β/BMP-dependent SMAD signaling. Immunofluorescence revealed the presence of early-stage NSC markers nestin and SOX1 in the iPS-neuron group (Figure 2), suggesting that the iPS-derived compact colony-forming cells were early-stage NSCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

NSCs derived from iPS cells cultured for 11 days.

After 11 days of differentiation, cells in the iPS-neuron group expressed NSC markers SOX1 (red) and nestin (green). (A) Light microscopy of NSCs. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining for SOX1 and nestin. Scale bar: 50 μm. iPS cells: Induced pluripotent stem cells; NSCs: neural stem cells; SOX1: SRY-box transcription factor 1.

Generation of neurons from iPS cell-derived NSCs

NSCs are multipotent and can differentiate into three neural subtypes: neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes. Here, we investigated the potential of NSC to differentiate into neurons. Single-cell-dissociated NSCs were seeded onto AggreWell in neuronal differentiation medium for 3 weeks. qPCR and immunofluorescence were used to confirm the differentiation of NSCs. qPCR analysis revealed that TUBB3 gene levels were upregulated. Immunofluorescence confirmed the PCR result, with cells observed to be immunoreactive for TUBB3. NeuN staining showed the cellular features of the neurons (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Expression of TUBB3 and NeuN in iPS cell-derived neurons differentiated from NSCs after 21 days of culture.

After 21 days of differentiation, cells in the iPS-neuron group expressed the neuronal markers TUBB3 and NeuN. (A) Microscopic morphology of iPS cell-derived neurons. Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) TUBB3 immunoreactivity in iPS cell-derived neurons (green: TUBB3; blue: DAPI). Scale bars: 50 μm. (C) TUBB3 gene expression in iPS cell-derived neurons and iPS cells. The TUBB3 expression level in the iPS-neuron group was upregulated 15.6-fold compared with iPS cells (gene expression relative to control [GAPDH]). (D) NeuN staining of iPS cell-derived neurons (a: DAPI, blue; b: NeuN, green; c: tubulin, red; d: merge). Scale bars: 25 μm. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (unpaired Student’s t-test, n = 3). *P < 0.05, vs. iPS-cell group. GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; iPS cells: induced pluripotent stem cells; NeuN: neuronal nuclear antigen.

iPS cell-derived neurons express MOR and KOR

Several lines of evidence suggest that opioid receptor internalization may be important for regulating neural function, whether in a physiological or non-physiological environment. We thus also tested whether our differentiated neurons expressed opioid receptors. Indeed, MOR and KOR expression was detected in both iPS cells and iPS cell-derived neurons. The immunoreactivity of MOR and KOR in iPS cells and iPS cell-derived neurons was calculated as the mean fluorescence intensity. Compared with the iPS-cell group, in the iPS-neuron group there was a 5.7-fold increase in mean fluorescence intensity of MOR and a 1.57-fold increase in KOR (Figure 4). MAP2, a neuron-specific protein that was used as a control, was upregulated 101.2-fold in iPS cell-derived neurons. Furthermore, transcription of both MOR and KOR was upregulated when the iPS cells differentiated into neurons (MOR: 38.3-fold, KOR: 1.33-fold, compared with iPS cells) (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immunoreactivity of KOR and MOR in iPS cells and iPS cell-derived neurons.

(A, B) Immunofluorescence staining demonstrates the immunoreactivity of KOR and MOR in iPS cell-derived neurons: green: KOR (A), MOR (B), blue: DAPI (A, B). Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) The MFI of MOR immunoreactivity (integrated density/area) in iPS cell-derived neurons was 5.7-fold that of iPS cells, while the MFI of KOR immunoreactivity was 1.57-fold that of iPS cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (unpaired Student’s t-test, n = 3). *P < 0.05, vs. iPS-cell group. iPS cells: Induced pluripotent stem cells; KOR: kappa-opioid receptor; MFI: mean fluorescence intensity; MOR: mu opioid receptor.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Gene expression levels of KOR and MOR in iPS cells and iPS cell-derived neurons.

The expression level of the gene encoding MOR in iPS cell-derived neurons was 38.3-fold that of iPS cells, and the expression levels of the genes encoding KOR and MAP2 were 1.33-fold and 101.2-fold, respectively (gene expression relative to control [GAPDH]). Data are shown as the mean ± SD (unpaired Student’s t-test, n = 3). *P < 0.05, vs. iPS-cell group. GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; KOR: kappa-opioid receptor; MAP2: microtubule-associated protein-2; MOR: mu opioid receptor.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that human iPS cell-derived neurons express opioid receptors, including KOR and MOR. With the differentiation of iPS cells into neurons, both the gene expression and immunoreactivity of MOR were markedly increased, whereas KOR was only slightly increased. Our results suggest that iPS cell-derived neurons may be an ideal candidate for studying human opioid receptor function.

Opioid receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor family, which constitutes the most abundant receptor class in the human genome (Fredriksson et al., 2003; Darcq and Kieffer, 2018). G-protein coupled receptors regulate a variety of biological functions, and are the receptor class most commonly targeted by pharmacological therapies. Receptor activation is often accompanied by receptor internalization, which is a complex regulatory process that terminates receptor cell surface signaling and can also elicit different intracellular signaling cascades (Pavlos and Friedman, 2017). MOR internalization plays a role in the signaling that mediates antinociception, as well as in the regulation of morphological changes in the dendritic spine effects of opioids (Liao et al., 2007; Macey et al., 2010). We previously used an in vitro model of oxygen/glucose deprivation and reoxygenation to explore how KOR responds to hypoxia and reoxygenation. The results indicated that, in neuroblastoma cells, hypoxia induces reversible KOR internalization, which is inhibited by selective KOR antagonists or dynamin inhibitors and reversed by reoxygenation (Xi et al., 2017). A previous study reported that, because of different phosphorylation sites in the KOR receptor, there are species differences between humans and mice in the functional selectivity of different KOR receptor agonists to activate G proteins and internalize the receptors (Di Mattio et al., 2015). However, the studies by both DiMattio et al. and ourselves were performed in transfected cell systems, which do not adequately mimic normal physiological environments (Di Mattio et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2017).

The lack of a scalable, robust, and physiologically relevant model of human neurons has hindered the study of opioid receptor functions in health and disease. However, iPS cells can be derived from diseased or disease-free subjects, and iPS cell-derived neurons from patients with genetically inherited neurological disorders can be used to study disease mechanisms (Lippmann et al., 2012; Abud et al., 2017; Georges et al., 2019; Vatine et al., 2019). Researchers found that a 3′ polymorphism with a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) affected human dopamine transporter expression levels in iPS cell-derived human dopaminergic neurons (Sheng et al., 2016). Another study demonstrated that human iPS cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells survived and functioned as midbrain dopaminergic neurons in a primate model of Parkinson’s disease (Kikuchi et al., 2017). Furthermore, Grossert et al. (2019) investigated the molecular mechanisms of ketamine treatment at clinically relevant concentrations by establishing an in vitro model based on human iPS cell-derived neural progenitor cells. These authors found that ketamine increased the proliferation of those cells via insulin-like growth factor 2, independent of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (Grossert et al., 2019).

Studies on cellular reprogramming, such as those involving iPS cells, can potentially eliminate the need for embryo-derived pluripotent cells, providing more detailed insights into human development and diseases while simultaneously surpassing ethical constraints. Furthermore, iPS cell-derived neurons reflect the individual and are thus closer to clinical practice. We reprogrammed urinary exfoliated renal epithelial cells to produce human iPS cells, based on our previous study, and successfully obtained non-integrating human iPS cells using the episomal system to deliver transcription factors (Ju et al., 2017). A non-integrating iPS cell without exogenous gene interference ensures that any neurons derived from it are adequately physiological, for mechanical studies. Our results confirmed that human iPS cells are readily available and can be used to generate iPS cell-derived neurons, which express KOR and MOR. Patient-derived iPS cells can model phenotypic diseases in neurons in which the genetic components of the disease are captured (Rowe and Daley, 2019). However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of pilot studies of opioid receptor internalization using human iPS cell-derived neural cells, and no studies investigating whether human iPS cell-derived neurons express opioid receptors. Here, we report the establishment of human iPS cell-derived neurons that express KOR and MOR.

Furthermore, gene expression and immunoreactivity of KOR and MOR were detected in both iPS cells and iPS cell-derived neurons in the present study. As the iPS cells differentiated into neurons, both the gene expression and immunoreactivity of MOR gradually increased. However, KOR had only slight increases in both mRNA levels and immunoreactivity. This increased expression of MOR indicates that it may be more important than KOR for neuronal differentiation. Our results revealed that, compared with MOR immunoreactivity, MOR mRNA levels were more elevated. Post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation, mRNA and protein degradation, modifications such as folding, and other factors may lead to inconsistencies between mRNA abundance and immunoreactivity. Moreover, the expression levels of many genes change over time, and this was confirmed in our study. Kim et al. (2006) reported that both MOR and KOR are necessary to induce embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to differentiate into neural progenitors. These authors detected MOR and KOR expression and immunoreactivity in both ESCs and retinoic acid-induced ESC-derived, nestin-positive neural progenitors. Both opioids promoted the limited proliferation of undifferentiated ESCs via the ERK/MAP kinase signaling pathway. Additionally, MOR- and KOR-selective agonists diverted ESCs from self-renewal and coaxed the cells to differentiate. In another study, opioid gene expression in P19 cells, a line of pluripotent murine ESCs, triggered the formation of myocardial cells in vitro (Ventura and Maioli, 2000). Our results demonstrated that both iPS cells and iPS cell-derived neurons have relatively high levels of MOR and KOR transcription and translation. However, we were unable to find relevant studies comparing the expression of opioid receptors between human primary neurons and iPS cell-derived neurons. This may be because of ethical constraints.

The focus of translational medicine should be closer to human conditions, rather than relying solely on animal models to study human diseases (De Filippis et al., 2016). Therefore, using human iPS cells to establish a model for studying human diseases may be an effective approach that can both identify disease mechanisms and allow drug screening. Previously, we established neurons derived from iPS cells that were reprogrammed from urinary exfoliated renal epithelial cells; in the present study, we demonstrated that these iPS cell-derived neurons express KOR and MOR. Taken together, our data support the feasibility of using iPS cell-derived neurons to investigate the role of opioid internalization in neuroprotection and to explore other opioid receptor functions in a human-derived model.

There are some shortcomings in our research. First, we only detected the expression of KOR and MOR because there have been more studies on the function of these two receptors, and they may have greater clinical significance. Second, although opioid receptor internalization plays a vital role in neuroprotection, we did not investigate whether physiological or non-physiological stimuli cause KOR and MOR internalization in iPS cell-derived neural cells. This will be the focus of our next study.

Collectively, we successfully established human iPS cell-derived neurons that express KOR and MOR, which is very conducive to the transformation of basic research theory into clinical practice. The development of iPS cell-derived neurons has expanded the scope of human research. More in-depth studies into opioid receptors in this cell model are expected to follow, which will provide more information about these receptors in humans.

Additional file: Open peer review report 1 (81.7KB, pdf) .

OPEN PEER REVIEW REPORT 1
NRR-16-653_Suppl1.pdf (81.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank all the students and staffs of Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, China for the constructive advice of this study.

Footnotes

P-Reviewer: Gajavelli S; C-Editor: Zhao M; S-Editors: Wang J, Li CH; L-Editors: Gardner B, Pack M, Qiu Y, Song LP; T-Editor: Jia Y

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Financial support: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81301065 (to XC); the Talent Training Plan of Beijing, No. D003034000031 (to XC). The funding sources had no role in study conception and design, data analysis or interpretation, paper writing or deciding to submit this paper for publication.

Institutional review board statement: The iPS cell line used in this study was available from a commercial organization. Our present experiment does not involve animals and humans, so it is free from ethics. All six donors in the study signed a consent form that was available as a requirement for human study.

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Data sharing statement: Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Open peer reviewer: Shyam Gajavelli, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81301065 (to XC); the Talent Training Plan of Beijing, No. D003034000031 (to XC).

References

  • 1.Abud EM, Ramirez RN, Martinez ES, Healy LM, Nguyen CHH, Newman SA, Yeromin AV, Scarfone VM, Marsh SE, Fimbres C, Caraway CA, Fote GM, Madany AM, Agrawal A, Kayed R, Gylys KH, Cahalan MD, Cummings BJ, Antel JP, Mortazavi A, et al. iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases. Neuron. 2017;94:278–293. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bae SH, Yoo MR, Kim YY, Hong IK, Kim MH, Lee SH, Kim DY. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor mediates macrophage migration inhibitory factor to protect neurons against oxygen-glucose deprivation. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15:1483–1489. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.274340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beevers JE, Caffrey TM, Wade-Martins R. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived dopaminergic models of Parkinson’s disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41:1503–1508. doi: 10.1042/BST20130194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Catanese L, Tarsia J, Fisher M. Acute ischemic stroke therapy overview. Circ Res. 2017;120:541–558. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen C, Cui X, Matsunaga F, Ma J, Ma N, Abel T, Liu R. Salvinorin A decreases mortality and improves neurological outcome in a neonatal mouse hypoxia model. Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2014;1:9–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chunhua C, Chunhua X, Megumi S, Renyu L. Kappa opioid receptor agonist and brain ischemia. Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2014;1:27–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Darcq E, Kieffer BL. Opioid receptors: drivers to addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19:499–514. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Filippis L, Halikere A, McGowan H, Moore JC, Tischfield JA, Hart RP, Pang ZP. Ethanol-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in iPS cells and iPS cells-derived neural progenitor cells. Mol Brain. 2016;9:51. doi: 10.1186/s13041-016-0221-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Di Mattio KM, Ehlert FJ, Liu-Chen LY. Intrinsic relative activities of kappa opioid agonists in activating Galpha proteins and internalizing receptor: differences between human and mouse receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;761:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.05.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dong H, Zhou W, Xin J, Shi H, Yao X, He Z, Wang Z. Salvinorin A moderates postischemic brain injury by preserving endothelial mitochondrial function via AMPK/Mfn2 activation. Exp Neurol. 2019;322:113045. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Drake AC. Of mice and men: what rodent models don’t tell us. Cell Mol Immunol. 2013;10:284–285. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2013.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eigentler A, Boesch S, Schneider R, Dechant G, Nat R. Induced pluripotent stem cells from friedreich ataxia patients fail to upregulate frataxin during in vitro differentiation to peripheral sensory neurons. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:3271–3282. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fredriksson R, Lagerstrom MC, Lundin LG, Schioth HB. The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;63:1256–1272. doi: 10.1124/mol.63.6.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Georges P, Boza-Moran MG, Gide J, Peche GA, Foret B, Bayot A, Rustin P, Peschanski M, Martinat C, Aubry L. Induced pluripotent stem cells-derived neurons from patients with Friedreich ataxia exhibit differential sensitivity to resveratrol and nicotinamide. Sci Rep. 2019;9:14568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49870-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grossert A, Mehrjardi NZ, Bailey SJ, Lindsay MA, Hescheler J, Saric T, Teusch N. Ketamine increases proliferation of human iPSC-derived neuronal progenitor cells via insulin-like growth factor 2 and independent of the NMDA receptor. Cells. 2019;8:1139. doi: 10.3390/cells8101139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gui X, Cui X, Wei H, Feng G, Zhang X, He Y, Li J, Li T. cPKCgamma membrane translocation is involved in herkinorininduced neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15:221–227. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gupta K, Prasad A, Nagappa M, Wong J, Abrahamyan L, Chung FF. Risk factors for opioid-induced respiratory depression and failure to rescue: a review. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31:110–119. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hill RS, Walsh CA. Molecular insights into human brain evolution. Nature. 2005;437:64–67. doi: 10.1038/nature04103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ju Z, Ma J, Wang C, Yu J, Qiao Y, Hei F. Exosomes from iPSCs delivering siRNA attenuate intracellular adhesion molecule-1 expression and neutrophils adhesion in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Inflammation. 2017;40:486–496. doi: 10.1007/s10753-016-0494-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kikuchi T, Morizane A, Doi D, Magotani H, Onoe H, Hayashi T, Mizuma H, Takara S, Takahashi R, Inoue H, Morita S, Yamamoto M, Okita K, Nakagawa M, Parmar M, Takahashi J. Human iPS cell-derived dopaminergic neurons function in a primate Parkinson’s disease model. Nature. 2017;548:592–596. doi: 10.1038/nature23664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim E, Clark AL, Kiss A, Hahn JW, Wesselschmidt R, Coscia CJ, Belcheva MM. μ-and κ-opioids induce the differentiation of embryonic stem cells to neural progenitors. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:33749–33760. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603862200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, Homfray T, Penninger JM, Jackson AP, Knoblich JA. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373–379. doi: 10.1038/nature12517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liang X, Liu R, Chen C, Ji F, Li T. Opioid system modulates the immune function: a review. Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2016;1:5–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liao D, Grigoriants OO, Wang W, Wiens K, Loh HH, Law PY. Distinct effects of individual opioids on the morphology of spines depend upon the internalization of mu opioid receptors. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007;35:456–469. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lippmann ES, Azarin SM, Kay JE, Nessler RA, Wilson HK, Al-Ahmad A, Palecek SP, Shusta EV. Derivation of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:783–791. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu Y, Li J, Yang J, Ji F, Bu X, Zhang N, Zhang B. Inhibition of PKCgamma membrane translocation mediated morphine preconditioning-induced neuroprotection against oxygen-glucose deprivation in the hippocampus slices of mice. Neurosci Lett. 2008;444:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Macey TA, Ingram SL, Bobeck EN, Hegarty DM, Aicher SA, Arttamangkul S, Morgan MM. Opioid receptor internalization contributes to dermorphin-mediated antinociception. Neuroscience. 2010;168:543–550. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Melo H, Basso L, Iftinca M, MacNaughton WK, Hollenberg MD, McKay DM, Altier C. Itch induced by peripheral mu opioid receptors is dependent on TRPV1-expressing neurons and alleviated by channel activation. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33620-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meng F, Li Y, Chi W, Li J. Morphine preconditioning downregulates microRNA-134 expression against oxygen-glucose deprivation injuries in cultured neurons of mice. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2016;28:195–202. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pavlos NJ, Friedman PA. GPCR signaling and trafficking: the long and short of it. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2017;28:213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pellissier LP, Gandia J, Laboute T, Becker JAJ, Le Merrer J. mu opioid receptor, social behaviour and autism spectrum disorder: reward matters. Br J Pharmacol. 2018;175:2750–2769. doi: 10.1111/bph.13808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rakic P. Evolution of the neocortex: a perspective from developmental biology. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:724–735. doi: 10.1038/nrn2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Robson LE, Gillan MG, Kosterlitz HW. Species differences in the concentrations and distributions of opioid binding sites. Eur J Pharmacol. 1985;112:65–71. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(85)90239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Roeckel LA, Le Coz GM, Gaveriaux-Ruff C, Simonin F. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Neuroscience. 2016;338:160–182. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rowe RG, Daley GQ. Induced pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:377–388. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0100-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shapovalov G, Gkika D, Devilliers M, Kondratskyi A, Gordienko D, Busserolles J, Bokhobza A, Eschalier A, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N. Opiates modulate thermosensation by internalizing cold receptor TRPM8. Cell Rep. 2013;4:504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sheng Y, Filichia E, Shick E, Preston KL, Phillips KA, Cooperman L, Lin Z, Tesar P, Hoffer B, Luo Y. Using iPSC-derived human DA neurons from opioid-dependent subjects to study dopamine dynamics. Brain Behav. 2016;6:e00491. doi: 10.1002/brb3.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sousa AMM, Meyer KA, Santpere G, Gulden FO, Sestan N. Evolution of the human nervous system function, structure, and development. Cell. 2017;170:226–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sun J, Yang X, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Lu J, Hu Q, Liu R, Zhou C, Chen C. Salvinorin A attenuates early brain injury through PI3K/Akt pathway after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rat. Brain Res. 2019;1719:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vatine GD, Barrile R, Workman MJ, Sances S, Barriga BK, Rahnama M, Barthakur S, Kasendra M, Lucchesi C, Kerns J, Wen N, Spivia WR, Chen Z, Van Eyk J, Svendsen CN. Human iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier chips enable disease modeling and personalized medicine applications. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:995–1005e1006. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ventura C, Maioli M. Opioid peptide gene expression primes cardiogenesis in embryonal pluripotent stem cells. Circ Res. 2000;87:189–194. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.3.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang C, Hei F, Ju Z, Yu J, Yang S, Chen M. Differentiation of urine-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells to alveolar type II epithelial cells. Cell Reprogram. 2016;18:30–36. doi: 10.1089/cell.2015.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xi C, Liang X, Chen C, Babazada H, Li T, Liu R. Hypoxia induces internalization of kappa-opioid receptor. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:842–854. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yu HL, Wang LZ, Zhang LL, Chen BL, Zhang HJ, Li YP, Xiao GD, Chen YZ. ESE1 expression correlates with neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampus after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14:841–849. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.249232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhou Y, Fathali N, Lekic T, Ostrowski RP, Chen C, Martin RD, Tang J, Zhang JH. Remote limb ischemic postconditioning protects against neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in rat pups by the opioid receptor/Akt pathway. Stroke. 2011;42:439–444. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

OPEN PEER REVIEW REPORT 1
NRR-16-653_Suppl1.pdf (81.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Neural Regeneration Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES