Table 4.
Comparison of ACL adsorption capacity and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite with other adsorbents used in CV removal process.
| Adsorbent | qe (mg/g) CV Dye | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetite alginate | 37.5 | [50] |
| P(AAm-MA)/MMT | 20.36 | [51] |
| Starch-g-poly (acrylic acid)/ZnSe | 10 | [52] |
| Poly (acrylamide)-kaolin composite hydrogel | 23.8 | [2] |
| Polyvinyl alcohol/agar/maltodextrin | 19.17 | [53] |
| Guar gum/bentonite bionanocomposite | 167.929 | [54] |
| Soil-silver nanocomposite | 1.918 | [55] |
| Activated carbon | 35.64 | [56] |
| NaOH-modified rice husk | 44.876 | [57] |
| Leaf biomass of Calotropis procera | 4.14 | [58] |
| TLAC/Chitosan composite | 0.269–2.375 | [59] |
| Chitin nanowhiskers | 59.52 | [60] |
| AC-Fe2O3·NPLs | 16.5 | [61] |
| Chitin-psyllium based aerogel | 227.11 | [62] |
| Poly(benzofuran-co-arylacetic acid)-FA | 25.10 | [63] |
| Azolla and fig leaves modified with magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles | 25 | [64] |
| Solid waste of rosewater extraction | 78.24 | [65] |
| Eucalyptus camdulensis sawdust-derived biochar (Ec-bio) | 54.7 | [66] |
| ACL | 23.64 | This study |
| ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite | 35.31 | This study |