The Editor in Chief has retracted this article in agreement with the author. After publication a number of concerns were raised about controversial statements and opinions expressed in this article. The author provided extensive corrections to a number of statements, and further clarifications regarding the methodology used. However, the Editor in Chief considered that these were too substantial for an erratum and that the article should be retracted. The author has submitted a new manuscript for peer review.
The author agrees to this retraction.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Footnotes
The Editor in Chief has retracted this article in agreement with the author. After publication a number of concerns were raised about controversial statements and opinions expressed in this article. The author provided extensive corrections to a number of statements, and further clarifications regarding the methodology used. However, the Editor in Chief considered that these were too substantial for an erratum and that the article should be retracted. The author has submitted a new manuscript for peer review.
The author agrees to this retraction. The online version of this article contains the full text of the retracted article as Supplementary Information.
Change history
6/9/2021
Editor’s Note: The Editorial team is currently investigating concerns raised about this article. We will update readers once we have further information and all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.