Abstract
Lysins, including chimeric lysins, have recently been explored as novel promising alternatives to failing antibiotics in treating multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Herein, by fusing the CHAP (cysteine, histidine-dependent amidohydrolase/peptidase) catalytic domain from the Ply187 lysin with the non-SH3b cell-wall binding domain from the LysSA97 lysin, a new chimeric lysin ClyC was constructed with Ca2+-enhanced bactericidal activity against all S. aureus strains tested, including MRSA. Notably, treating S. aureus with 50 μg/mL of ClyC in the presence of 100 μM Ca2+ lead to a reduction of 9 Log10 (CFU/mL) in viable bacterial number, which was the first time to observe a lysin showing such a high activity. In addition, the effective concentration of ClyC could be decreased dramatically from 12 to 1 μg/mL by combination with 0.3 μg/mL of penicillin G. In a mouse model of S. aureus bacteremia, a single intraperitoneal administration of 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC significantly improved the survival rates and reduced 2 Log10 (CFU/mL) of the bacterial burdens in the organs of the infected mice. ClyC was also found stable after lyophilization without cryoprotectants. Based on the above observations, ClyC could be a promising candidate against S. aureus infections.
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, lysin, bactericidal activity, calcium, bacteremia, ClyC
1. Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is a common Gram-positive pathogen that colonizes the human surface skin [1,2]. This opportunistic pathogen can cause severe infections, such as pneumonia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, meningitis, and bacteremia [3]. S. aureus-related infections have become a challenge due to the emergence of isolates that are resistant to different antibiotics including methicillin (MRSA) [4]. To combat this threat, novel antimicrobial alternatives with different mechanisms of action from conventional antibiotics are urgently needed [5,6].
Endolysins (or lysins) are hydrolytic enzymes capable of specifically recognizing target bacterial cell wall and cleaving its peptidoglycan for the release of progeny virions during the lytic cycle of phages [7,8]. This specificity, coupled with the low resistance risk of lysins, have made them promising alternatives to failing antibiotics in combating multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens [9,10]. Some phage lysins have been reported to have good activities against S. aureus and are in clinical trials now [11,12,13]. However, some lysins may have dose-dependent toxicity [14]. It is important for a lysin drug candidate to possess as high as possible activity in order to have a better therapeutic index.
Utilizing the modular structure property of phage lysins, i.e., one or two catalytic domains (CDs) in the N-terminus and one cell-wall binding domain (CBD) in the C-terminus, chimeric lysins have been constructed to improve lysis activity [15], extend bactericidal spectrum [16], or improve stability [17], etc. For example, Yang et al. constructed a chimeric lysin, ClyR, by fusing the CHAP (cysteine, histidine-dependent amidohydrolase/peptidase) domain from the PlyC lysin with the CBD from the PlySs2 lysin [16,18]. This combination resulted to a newly reported chimeric lysin with robust bactericidal activity and an extended-spectrum streptococcal host range that includes multiple streptococcal species, as well as representative species of enterococci and staphylococci (including MRSA and VISA). Apart from chimeric lysins, other techniques like fusion of natural lysins or parts of their domain with components of proteins or peptides (artilysins) [19] also exist on engineering of lysins. These techniques can be summarized into first generation lysins (wild type lysins as antimicrobial agents), second generation lysins (engineered to improve antibacterial and biochemical properties), and third generation lysins (engineered to improve pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics) [20].
There are also reports that the activity of some lysins could be enhanced by host factors in serum [21]. CF-301 showed substantially greater potency (32 to 100-fold) in human blood versus the normal buffers by acting synergistically with two key human blood factors, human serum lysozyme (HuLYZ) and human serum albumin (HSA). This finding may have important therapeutic implications for durable improvements in clinical outcomes of serious antibiotic-resistant staphylococcal infections.
In this study, we aimed to find chimeric lysins with high activity, which could be enhanced further by metal ions, especially Ca2+, in human blood. Ca2+ is suitable because calcium ion is one of the abundant metallic ions necessary in the human body. The free calcium ion in the human blood reaches up to 1200 mM [22]. It has also been found that some natural lysins contain domains capable of binding Ca2+ and their activity depends on Ca2+ [23,24]. We formed a new chimeric lysin, ClyC, by fusing the CHAP catalytic domain from the Ply187 lysin [25,26] with the non-SH3b CBD from the LysSA97 lysin [27]. Ply187 is a S. aureus bacteriophage 187 endolysin that was initially reported by Loessner et al. [25]. This lysin is unique among Gram-positive lysins because it lacks a CBD [15]. To improve its activity, the CHAP domain of Ply187 has been fused with the CBD of other lysins to form a new chimera. Similarly, we fused the CHAP domain of Ply187 with the non-SH3b CBD of LysSA97 to form the new chimera, ClyC. The non-SH3b CBD used is derived from the bacteriophage SA97 endolysin, LysSA97 [27,28]. Among S. aureus lysins, it is not common to find lysins without the SH3 domain. In a study by Chang and Ryu [28], after analysis of 98 endolysin genes of S. aureus phages, it was found that most lysins have a known CBD (80.61%) with a src-homology 3 (SH3, PF08460) domain, while few lysins (19.39%) like LySA97 have a novel putative CBD at their C-terminal.
The formed chimeric lysin, ClyC, showed a reduction of 9 log10 (CFU/mL) in viable bacterial number in the presence of Ca2+. More interesting, ClyC was found stable after lyophilization without stabilizing excipients. These properties indicated that ClyC could be a good candidate for further development into a drug for the treatment of infections caused by S. aureus.
2. Results
2.1. Construction and Purification of ClyC
As shown in Figure 1A, a new chimeric lysin, ClyC (257 amino acids), was constructed by fusing the N-terminal CHAP domain of the Ply187 lysin (157 amino acids) with the C-terminal non-SH3b binding domain of the LysSA97 lysin (100 amino acids). SDS-PAGE analysis showed that ClyC could be expressed as a soluble protein in E. coli and the purified ClyC protein displayed high purity (>90%) (Figure 1B).
2.2. Bactericidal Activity of ClyC
The bactericidal activity of ClyC was determined using the plaque assay and turbidity experiments. In the turbidity reduction experiment, the OD600 values of two representative S. aureus bacterial suspensions reduced rapidly within 1 min after exposure to ClyC (Figure 2A,B), showing similar slopes in the time-killing curves. The bacterial suspension also became clear after treatment with 25 μg/mL of ClyC for 10 min (Figure 2C), which meant that S. aureus cells were lysed quickly by ClyC. In support, clear plaques could also be seen in the plate after dipping 0.02–1.65 μg of ClyC on the lawn of S. aureus (Figure 2D). These results collectively demonstrated that ClyC is active against S. aureus. Further, the lytic spectrum of ClyC was determined with multiple bacterial strains. As shown in Figure S1, all 32 S. aureus strains and 6 other staphylococcal isolates tested were susceptible to ClyC. Notably, the lytic activity of ClyC was almost the same among all S. aureus strains tested within 10 min (Figure S1). However, ClyC was not active against streptococcus, enterococcus, and listeria. In addition, the MICs of ClyC against multiple S. aureus isolates were further determined. As shown in Table S3, ClyC showed MIC’s of 18 μg/mL for 19 isolates, 9 μg/mL for 7 isolates, 36 μg/mL for 2 isolates, and 4.5 μg/mL for 1 isolate, resulting in an overall average MIC of 16.6 μg/mL (SD ± 6.9).
2.3. Characteristics of ClyC
Next, we tested the effects of Mg2+, Zn2+, NaCl, EDTA, pH, temperature, 5% BSA, and human serum on the antibacterial activity of ClyC. Results showed that Mg2+ (Figure 3A), Zn2+ (Figure 3B), NaCl (Figure 3C), and EDTA (Figure 3D) inhibited the antibacterial activity of ClyC in a dose-dependent manner. Specifically, 50 μM of Zn2+ or EDTA completely abolished the lytic activity of ClyC. High activity was observed at pH ranging from 4 to 10 (Figure 3E) and temperatures below 45 °C (Figure 3F). Surprisingly, enhanced staphylolytic activity of ClyC was observed in PBS containing 5% BSA (Figure 3G) and in PBS containing 0.25–12% human serum (Figure 3H).
2.4. Effects of Calcium on the Enzymatic Activity of ClyC
Amino acid sequence revealed that there is a conserved Ca2+ binding site (D29, D31, Y33, G35, D40, relative position of amino acids: 1, 3, 5, 7, 12) of amino acids in the CHAP domain of Ply187 in the newly formed ClyC (Figure 4A–C). As expected, calcium promotes the activity of ClyC in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4D–G). Specifically, a reduction of 9 log10 (CFU/mL) in viable bacterial number was observed after treating overnight cultured S. aureus T23 with 50 μg/mL of ClyC containing 100 μM Ca2+ at 37 °C for 20 min (Figure 4F). For Figure 4D,E,G, 100 μM Ca2+ still maintains good activity against S. aureus. Within 10 min, the concentration of ClyC was about 5× that of ClyC+100 μM Ca2+ in order to achieve a similar log reduction (Figure 4H). In addition, ClyC retained a full antibacterial activity after being lyophilized without stabilizing excipients (Figure 4I).
2.5. Effects of ClyC Alone against Planktonic and Sessile S. aureus or in Combination with Penicillin G
S. aureus strain T23 was used to test the biofilm removal efficacy of ClyC and the combined antimicrobial effects of ClyC and penicillin G. Crystal violet staining assay showed that the biofilm of T23 was removed by ClyC in a dose-dependent manner. Specifically, biofilm could rarely be observed in wells treated with 10 μg/mL of ClyC for 1 h (Figure S2A). In a checkerboard assay, an obvious additive effect was observed between ClyC and penicillin G (Figure S2B). The MIC values of ClyC and penicillin G were 12 and 0.6 μg/mL, respectively. S. aureus treated with combinations of two antimicrobial agents (1 μg/mL ClyC and 0.3 μg/mL penicillin G or 6 μg/mL ClyC and 0.2 μg/mL penicillin G) showed ƩFIC of 0.42, which is <0.5 and thus indicates the synergism between the two antimicrobials [29].
2.6. ClyC Cytotoxicity In Vitro
The CHO-K1 cell line was used to detect ClyC’s cytotoxicity. As shown in Figure S3A, rare cytotoxicity was observed under a high ClyC concentration of up to 125 μg/mL. This meant that the lower doses of ClyC (<50 μg/mL) used in previous in vivo and in vitro experiments were safe. To further confirm the safety of ClyC administrated in vivo, we measured the expression levels of cytokine IL-8 in mice serum after administration of 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC (n = 5) at different times post-infection. As shown in Figure S3B, compared with the PBS-treated group, no significant difference in the expression levels of IL-8 was observed in the ClyC-treated group at 2, 3, 5, and 7 h post infection (h.p.i).
2.7. ClyC Protects Mice from Lethal S. aureus Infection
A mouse systemic infection model was established to determine the protective efficacy of ClyC in vivo. Female BALB/c mice were challenged interperitoneally with a lethal dose of 3 × 108 CFU/mouse of S. aureus T23. Large bacterial loads could be detected in the liver, spleen, kidney (Figure 5A), and blood (Figure 5B) of the infected mice at 1 h.p.i. Subsequently, mice received a single dose of 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC, 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC containing 100 μM Ca2+, or an equal volume of PBS at 1 h.p.i with a lethal dose of S. aureus T23. As shown in Figure 5C, the survival rates were 66%, 83%, and 0% in groups treated with 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC, 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC containing 100 μM Ca2+, and PBS, respectively. To further understand the mechanism of protection of ClyC, we determined the bacterial burden in liver and spleen of the infected mice after treatment with ClyC or PBS at 1 and 6 h.p.i. Results showed that bacterial loads decreased significantly in organs from the ClyC-treated group compared to those of the PBS-treated group. In particular, a reduction of 2 Log10 (CFU/g) was observed in the group that received ClyC treatment at 6 h.p.i (Figure 5D).
3. Discussion
Lysins are considered as novel alternatives against multidrug-resistant pathogens [7,30]. Chimeric lysins, which are derived from natural lysins, have been shown to have improved properties compared to natural lysins [31,32]. In this study, a novel chimeric lysin, ClyC, was constructed by fusing the CD from the Ply187 lysin with the CBD from the LysSA97 lysin. The CD of Ply187 (1–157aa, Ply187N) was chosen because it has been shown to have much higher activity compared to its parental full length S. aureus phage Ply187 [25]. Similar to other studies [15,26,33,34], this activity can be further improved by binding it to the CBD of another lysin to form a novel chimeric lysin. The non-SH3b CBD of LysSA97 has a specific binding spectrum to staphylococcus cells [28], hence used to form the new chimera, ClyC. The chimera was found active against all MRSA strains and other staphylococcal species tested, with a wide pH range from 4 to 10 (retained a high lytic activity above 30% of the maximum), making it different from most other lysins which regularly shows good activity in a pH range of 5~8 [35,36]. This wide tolerance to pH has also been reported on the CHAP domain of Ply187 used in this study [37]. Unlike some proteins which are inactive in the presence of serum or bovine serum albumin (BSA) [38], a higher activity was observed in ClyC in the presence of 5% BSA.
S. aureus are capable of causing biofilms that can make them less susceptible to antibiotics compared to planktonic bacteria [39,40]. Here, ClyC could remove S. aureus biofilms in a dose dependent manner. Specifically, after 1-h exposure to a dosage of 10 μg/mL of ClyC, biofilms formed by MRSA T23 could rarely be observed. This means that ClyC has the potential to be used for topical removal of S. aureus biofilms and treatment of S. aureus biofilm-related infections as suggested in previous studies [31,40]. Additionally, lysins have also been suggested to have synergistic interactions with antibiotics [41,42]. A staphylococcal specific lysin, ClyS, showed synergistic effects in vitro (ΣFIC < 0.5) with two commonly used antibiotics (oxacillin and vancomycin) to treat S. aureus infections [42]. Similarly, ClyC had a synergistic effect with penicillin G in vitro (ΣFIC < 0.5). Penicillin G is a broad-spectrum antibiotic capable of inhibiting a wide range of bacterial infection including staphylococcal infections. In this study, we speculate that the in vivo synergy between penicillin G and ClyC is due to the enhanced lysis of the S. aureus bacteria.
Besides its high activity in normal buffers, ClyC showed significantly enhanced activity in the presence of Ca2+. Looking at the amino acid sequence of ClyC, there is one conserved calcium binding site in its catalytic domain (relative position 1, 3, 5, 7, 12) and four aspartic acids in its C terminus (D residues in locations 193, 200, 201, 206 of ClyC). It has been reported that three aspartic acid residues can bind Ca2+ [24]. Therefore, ClyC may possess two calcium-binding sites, which may be the reason why ClyC’s activity is highly enhanced by Ca2+. Additionally, using a similar CHAP domain of Ply187, Meng et.al found that different ions including calcium ions could increase the activity of Ply187 [37]. In order to achieve a similar effect, the concentration of ClyC was about 5× that of ClyC+Ca2+. However, this experiment was done within 10 min and we do believe that the activity of ClyC can increase with an increase in time beyond 10 min. Although several lysins [24,36,43] have shown Ca2+ dependent activity, this is the first time to see that Ca2+ could enhance the activity of ClyC dramatically, with up to 9 Log10 (CFU/mL) S. aureus cell reduction within 20 min in the presence of Ca2+. As far as we know, most lysins against S. aureus have a log reduction of between 2–4 logs and only PlySs2 lysin [18] (described as one of the broadest acting lysins) has shown a high reduction of about 5 logs against MRSA which is still lesser than that of ClyC.
The activity of ClyC was increased in the presence of human serum. This was mainly because human serum contains large amounts of free calcium [22]. The calcium-enhanced bactericidal activity of ClyC would mean that less protein needs to be used in treating sepsis since there naturally exists Ca2+ in human blood. We also believe that the higher antibacterial activity observed in 5% BSA was possibly due to the residual calcium in BSA, which is usually produced from bovine blood.
Lyophilization is a widely used method to keep proteins stable during storage [44]. Excipients such as BSA and sugars are regularly needed to prevent proteins from denaturation during freeze-drying. ClyC was found able to maintain good antibacterial activity without any stabilizing excipients. This unique property could mean that ClyC may be a robust lysin for further developments.
The cytotoxicity assay and mouse model tests demonstrated that ClyC has low cytotoxicity and good protective efficacy at a low dose of 0.1 mg/mouse. In comparison, a higher dose was needed for other lysins to achieve comparable protection. For example, ClyH was reported to protect 80% of lethal S. aureus challenged mice under a higher dose of 1 mg/mouse [33]. Using a small dose of lysin for treatment would not only ensure safety because of its dose-dependent cytotoxicity in human cell lines [14], but also benefit the reduction of immune responses which might lead to side effects. Despite the in vitro increase in bactericidal activity of ClyC in the presence of Ca2+, there was no significant difference between the survival rate of the mice treated with ClyC and those treated with ClyC plus 100 μM Ca2+. The reason was speculated to be due to the natural existence of calcium ions in the mice body which could have improved the activity of ClyC and masked the effects of the additional Ca2+.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Ethical Consideration
All mouse experiments were carried out in an ABSL-2 lab. The experimental protocols were carried out following the regulations and guidelines set forth by the Animal Experiments Committee of Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and approved by the committee (No: WIVA17201602).
4.2. Bacterial Strains
All bacterial expression strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. S. aureus strains including Methicillin-resistant S. aureus T23 were cultured in lysogeny broth (LB) medium at 37 °C. Streptococcus agalactiae were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth at 37 °C. Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3), used for gene cloning and protein expression, was grown in LB medium, and 50 μg/mL of kanamycin was supplemented when needed (Supplementary Materials Table S1). Bacterial loads in mice organs (liver, kidney, and spleen) and blood were counted in Baird-Parker agar plates containing 5% egg-yolk tellurite emulsion.
4.3. Construction of Expression Plasmids and Protein Purification
The ClyC to be constructed in this study consisted of the CD of Ply187 (Ply187CD, amino acids 1–157, GenBank: CAA69022.1) [31] and the CBD of LysSA97 (SA97CBD, amino acids 370–470, GenBank: AHZ95694.1) [32]. Using the four primers A (Ply187CD-F), B (Ply187CD-R), C (SA97CBD-F), and D (SA97CBD-R) listed in Table S2, ClyC was constructed by using a PCR-driven overlap extension technique. Firstly, ply187CD gene and SA97CBD gene were obtained by two independent PCRs using A+B and C+D as primers and the plasmids pET28a-Ply187CD and pET28a-SA97CBD (synthesized by Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) as templates, respectively. Resultant PCR products and the primers A and D were used for a third PCR to amplify the ClyC gene. Afterwards, the PCR product was cloned into the NcoI and XhoI sites of the pET28a (+) plasmid (GenBank: MK847907.1). Finally, the recombinant plasmid pET28a-ClyC was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). The sequence of the chimeric ClyC gene was confirmed by sequencing.
The expression strain of E. coli BL21 cells were incubated in LB medium containing 0.1 mg/mL of kanamycin to an OD600 of 0.4~0.6, then induced with 0.2 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) at 16 °C for 18 h to allow protein expression. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 8000× g for 5 min, resuspended in 20 mM imidazole, lysed by a cell disrupter on ice, and finally centrifuged at 10,000× g for 30 min to remove cell debris. His-tagged proteins were purified by affinity chromatography using nickel nitrilotriacetic acid columns. Target proteins were collected by washing and eluting with 40- and 250-mM imidazole, respectively. Collected proteins were dialyzed against PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4·H2O, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4). The dialyzed protein was then passed through a Detoxi-Gel™ Endotoxin Removing Gel (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified by a ToxinSensor Chromogenic LAL Endotoxin Assay Kit (GenScript, Nanjing, China).
4.4. Lytic Activity Assay
The bacteriolytic activity of ClyC was determined by the turbidity reduction assay. Briefly, cells of bacterial strains to be tested were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 1 min, resuspended in PBS buffer (pH 7.4), and mixed with ClyC (0, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) to a final OD600 of 0.8~1.2. The decrease of samples in OD600 was monitored by a Synergy H1 microplate reader every 30 s for 10 min at 37 °C.
To test the lytic spectrum of ClyC, multiple strains of streptococci (including S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae), staphylococci (including S. aureus, S. epidermidis), and listeria were tested for sensitivity to ClyC. Overnight cultured strains were washed once with PBS and resuspended to a final OD600 of 0.8~0.9. The cultures were then treated with 25 μg/mL of ClyC at 37 °C for 10 min, and the OD600 of each treatment was monitored by a microplate reader. Susceptibility to ClyC was defined as the net change in OD600 yielded from the final OD600 subtracted from that of the PBS treated control well. For the plaque assay, 0.02–1.65 μg of ClyC in a volume of 5 μL was spotted onto agar plates overlaid with S. aureus and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Bactericidal activity was expressed by clear zones on the agar plates. Viability of treated cells measured as log CFU/mL was determined by serial dilution and plating to LB agar plates.
4.5. Lyophilization
ClyC only and ClyC plus CaCl2 were lyophilized using the LyoBeta 6PL (Telstar, Spain) instrument. Briefly, 0.5 mL of ClyC (0.5 mg/mL) and ClyC plus CaCl2, in PBS were loaded into a clean 5mL bottle and lyophilized under the following conditions: freezing at −30 °C for 4 h, condenser preparation for 15 min, chamber vacuum at 400 μbar atmosphere pressure, primary drying at −40 °C for 13 h at 200 μbar atmosphere pressure, and a final secondary drying at 4 °C for 6 h. Three days post freeze drying, the lyophilized powders were re-dissolving in ultra-pure water to test for the lytic activity of ClyC.
4.6. MIC of ClyC Alone and in Combination with Penicillin G
To determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ClyC, we tested 26 strains of MRSA and 3 strains of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus. Briefly, S. aureus strains were inoculated in LB at a final concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well into a 96-well microtiter plate and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in the presence of different concentrations of ClyC (0, 1, 2, 4.5, 9, 18, and 36 μg/mL). MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of ClyC inhibiting visible growth.
Synergistic antimicrobial action between ClyC and penicillin G against S. aureus was tested in vitro using the checkerboard assay. Briefly, S. aureus T23 was inoculated at a final concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well in a 96-well microtiter plate, and allowed to incubate in LB for 24 h at 37 °C in the presence of varying concentrations of ClyC (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 μg/mL), penicillin G (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 μg/mL), or a mixture of ClyC and penicillin G. The sum of the fractional inhibitory concentrations (FICs) of both antimicrobials (ƩFIC = FICClyC + FICpenicillin G = MICClyC + penicillin G/MICClyC + MICpenicillin G + ClyC/MICpenicillin G) was calculated.
4.7. Effects of Different Factors on ClyC Activity
S. aureus T23 cells were suspended in phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 7.4) to a final OD600 of 1.0 containing various concentrations of EDTA (ranging from 0 to 800 μM), Ca2 + (CaCl2 ranging from 0 to 1000 μM), Mg2+ (MgCl2 ranging from 0 to 5000 μM), Zn2+ (ZnCl2 ranging from 0 to 100 μM), NaCl (ranging from 0 to 1000 μM), and human serum (ranging from 0.25 to 12%). The lytic activities of ClyC at different pH values were also measured using a universal buffer as previously described [35]. ClyC was then added to the suspensions to a final concentration of 25 μg/mL. Finally, the OD600 of the mixtures was monitored by a microplate reader at 37 °C for 60 min. The residual activity of ClyC (25 μg/mL) against S. aureus T23 was measured as the decrease in OD600 within 60 min after treatment at different temperatures ranging from 4 to 65 °C for 30 min. S. aureus T23 cells were first suspended in PBS containing 5% BSA to a final OD600 of 0.8. The cells were then incubated with different concentrations of ClyC (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL) at 37 °C for 60 min. The mixtures were finally serially diluted and plated onto LB agar for CFU count of live S. aureus.
4.8. Construction of 3D Models of ClyC
Amino acid sequences of the CD of Ply187 (GenBank: CAA69022.1) [26] and the CBD of LysSA97 (GenBank: AHZ95694.1) [28] were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The 3D protein model structures were constructed to analyze their Ca2+ binding sites using the SWISS-MODEL server [45].
4.9. ClyC Cytotoxicity Assay
The cytotoxicity of ClyC was studied using MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Briefly, 100 µL of CHO-K1 cells (Chinese hamster ovary cells) were seeded into a 96-well plate at a final concentration of 5 × 103 cells/well and allowed to adhere to the surface for 24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Next, the medium was removed, and new medium containing different concentrations of filter-sterilized ClyC (0, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 μg/mL) was added to each well and allowed to co-culture for 24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Afterwards, 10 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. MTT was then removed, and 200 μL of DMSO was added into each well and mixed for 10 min at a speed of 100 rpm/min. The OD570 of each well was finally read by a microplate reader. The medium without ClyC served as the positive control (PC), while medium without ClyC and CHO-K1 cells served as the negative control (NC). The relative cytotoxicity of cells was calculated as: %cytotoxicity = [1 − (ODsample − ODNC)/(ODPC − ODNC)] × 100%.
4.9.1. Biofilm Removal Efficacy of ClyC
Crystal violet (CV) staining assay was used to determine the biofilm removing capability of ClyC. Briefly, 10 µL of overnight cultures of S. aureus T23 and 190 µL of TSBG (TSB + 1% glucose) were dispensed into wells of a 96-well polystyrene plate (Tissue culture treated, Nest, China), and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to allow biofilm formation. After removing the supernatant and washing three times with sterile PBS, biofilms were treated with 200 µL of different concentration of ClyC or PBS (control) for 1 h. After washing twice with PBS, wells were dried and stained with 100 μL of 4% CV/well for 5 min at 37 °C. Following that, wells were washed with sterile PBS twice carefully, and resuspended in 200 µL of absolute ethanol. Finally, OD600 of each well was read by a microplate reader. The biofilm removal efficacy was presented as the difference in OD600 between ClyC and PBS treated wells.
4.9.2. Mouse Infection Model
To test the protective efficacy of ClyC, female BALB/c mice, 6–8 weeks old, were injected intraperitoneally with a lethal dose of S. aureus T23 and divided into three groups (6 each). Three hours post infection (h.p.i), groups were administrated intraperitoneally with either 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC, 0.1 mg/mouse of ClyC containing 100 μM Ca2+, or an equal volume of PBS. The survival rates for all groups were recorded for 15 days. Meanwhile, bacterial loads in blood and organs were also tested at different times (1, 3, and 6 h.p.i). Briefly, blood was collected and serially diluted for CFU count on LB agar. Kidney, liver, and lungs were aseptically removed from each mouse, infiltrated in 1 mL PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100, and prepared to tissue homogenates using a QIAGEN Tissue Lyse II homogenizer at 1/20 frequency for 90 s. Finally, serial dilutions of each organ were plated on Baird-Parker agar for CFU count. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) level in blood was also measured using a commercial ELISA kit (Shengdawei technology, China). Here, sera were separated from the mice blood by centrifugation at 3000 g for 30 min, and IL8 was detected following the instructions of the kit.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, we report here a novel chimeric lysin, ClyC, that possess robust and stable bactericidal activity against S. aureus in vitro and in vivo without foreseeable harmful effects. Its Ca2+ enhanced activity means that a much smaller amount of ClyC could be used in vivo, which would reduce possible side effects and improve its therapeutic index.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Jia Wu, Xuefang An, Yun Peng, and Ge Gao from the Core Facility and Technical Support, Wuhan Institute of Virology, for their assistance in animal experiments.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10040461/s1, Figure S1: Lytic spectrum of ClyC, Figure S2: Effects of ClyC alone against planktonic and sessile S. aureus or in combination with penicillin G, Figure S3: Cytotoxicity of ClyC, Table S1: Bacterial strains used in this study, Table S2: Primers used in the overlap PCR, Table S3: MIC of ClyC against different S. aureus strains.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.Y. and H.W.; methodology, X.L. and S.W.; software, R.N.; validation, X.L., S.W., R.N. and H.L.; formal analysis, X.L., S.W. and R.N.; investigation, X.L., S.W. and H.L.; resources, H.Y. and H.W.; data curation, X.L., S.W., R.N. and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L., S.W., R.N., H.Y. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, X.L., S.W., R.N., H.L., H.Y. and H.W.; visualization, X.L. and S.W.; supervision, H.Y. and H.W.; project administration, H.W.; funding acquisition, H.Y. and H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31570175 to H.W., numbers. 31770192 and 32070187 to H.Y.), and The Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (to H.Y.).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The experimental protocols were carried out following the regulations and guidelines set forth by the Animal Experiments Committee of Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and approved by the committee (No: WIVA17201602).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Favero M.S. Outbreaks of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2003;24:787. doi: 10.1086/infeconthospepid.24.10.787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pollitt E.J.G., Szkuta P.T., Burns N., Foster S.J. Staphylococcus aureus infection dynamics. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007112. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dayan G.H., Mohamed N., Scully I.L., Cooper D., Begier E., Eiden J., Jansen K.U., Gurtman A., Anderson A.S. Staphylococcus aureus: The current state of disease, pathophysiology and strategies for prevention. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2016;15:1373–1392. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2016.1179583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Enright M.C. The evolution of a resistant pathogen–the case of MRSA. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2003;3:474–479. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4892(03)00109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Foster T.J. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017;41:430–449. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mulani M.S., Kamble E.E., Kumkar S.N., Tawre M.S., Pardesi K.R. Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:539. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gondil V.S., Harjai K., Chhibber S. Endolysins as emerging alternative therapeutic agents to counter drug-resistant infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55:105844. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Szweda P., Schielmann M., Kotlowski R., Gorczyca G., Zalewska M., Milewski S. Peptidoglycan hydrolases-potential weapons against Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;96:1157–1174. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4484-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gutiérrez D., Fernández L., Rodríguez A., García P. Are Phage Lytic Proteins the Secret Weapon To Kill Staphylococcus aureus. MBio. 2018;9:e01923-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01923-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fischetti V.A. Bacteriophage endolysins: A novel anti-infective to control Gram-positive pathogens. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010;300:357–362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jun S.Y., Jang I.J., Yoon S., Jang K., Yu K.-S., Cho J.Y., Seong M.-W., Jung G.M., Yoon S.J., Kang S.H. Pharmacokinetics and Tolerance of the Phage Endolysin-Based Candidate Drug SAL200 after a Single Intravenous Administration among Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e02629-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02629-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oh J.T., Cassino C., Schuch R. Postantibiotic and Sub-MIC Effects of Exebacase (Lysin CF-301) Enhance Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02616-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02616-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Totté J.E.E., van Doorn M.B., Pasmans S.G.M.A. Successful Treatment of Chronic Staphylococcus aureus-Related Dermatoses with the Topical Endolysin Staphefekt SA.100: A Report of 3 Cases. Case Rep. Dermatol. 2017;9:19–25. doi: 10.1159/000473872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang H., Gong Y., Zhang H., Etobayeva I., Miernikiewicz P., Luo D., Li X., Zhang X., Dąbrowska K., Nelson D.C., et al. ClyJ Is a Novel Pneumococcal Chimeric Lysin with a Cysteine- and Histidine-Dependent Amidohydrolase/Peptidase Catalytic Domain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02043-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02043-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mao J., Schmelcher M., Harty W.J., Foster-Frey J., Donovan D.M. Chimeric Ply187 endolysin kills Staphylococcus aureus more effectively than the parental enzyme. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013;342:30–36. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang H., Linden S.B., Wang J., Yu J., Nelson D.C., Wei H. A chimeolysin with extended-spectrum streptococcal host range found by an induced lysis-based rapid screening method. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:17257. doi: 10.1038/srep17257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Swift S.M., Seal B.S., Garrish J.K., Oakley B.B., Hiett K., Yeh H.-Y., Woolsey R., Schegg K.M., Line J.E., Donovan D.M. A Thermophilic Phage Endolysin Fusion to a Clostridium perfringens-Specific Cell Wall Binding Domain Creates an Anti-Clostridium Antimicrobial with Improved Thermostability. Viruses. 2015;7:3019–3034. doi: 10.3390/v7062758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gilmer D.B., Schmitz J.E., Euler C.W., Fischetti V.A. Novel Bacteriophage Lysin with Broad Lytic Activity Protects against Mixed Infection by Streptococcus pyogenes and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2743–2750. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02526-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Briers Y., Walmagh M., Van Puyenbroeck V., Cornelissen A., Cenens W., Aertsen A., Oliveira H., Azeredo J., Verween G., Pirnay J.-P., et al. Engineered Endolysin-Based “Artilysins” To Combat Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens. MBio. 2014;5:e01379-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01379-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.De Maesschalck V., Gutiérrez D., Paeshuyse J., Lavigne R., Briers Y. Advanced engineering of third-generation lysins and formulation strategies for clinical applications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;46:548–564. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1809346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Indiani C., Sauve K., Raz A., Abdelhady W., Xiong Y.Q., Cassino C., Bayer A.S., Schuch R. The Antistaphylococcal Lysin, CF-301, Activates Key Host Factors in Human Blood To Potentiate Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriolysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02291-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02291-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fogh-Andersen N., Christiansen T.F., Komarmy L., Siggaard-Andersen O. Measurement of free calcium ion in capillary blood and serum. Clin. Chem. 1978;24:1545–1552. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/24.9.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Filatova L., Donovan D., Swift S., Pugachev V., Emelianov G., Chubar T., Klaychko N. Kinetics of inactivation of staphylolytic enzymes: Qualitative and quantitative description. Biochimie. 2019;162:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gu J., Feng Y., Feng X., Sun C., Lei L., Ding W., Niu F., Jiao L., Yang M., Li Y., et al. Structural and Biochemical Characterization Reveals LysGH15 as an Unprecedented “EF-Hand-Like” Calcium-Binding Phage Lysin. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004109. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Loessner M.J., Gaeng S., Scherer S. Evidence for a Holin-Like Protein Gene Fully Embedded Out of Frame in the Endolysin Gene of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophage 187. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:4452–4460. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.15.4452-4460.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dong Q., Wang J., Yang H., Wei C., Yu J., Zhang Y., Huang Y., Zhang X.-E., Wei H. Construction of a chimeric lysin Ply187N-V12C with extended lytic activity against staphylococci and streptococci. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015;8:210–220. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chang Y., Shin H., Lee J.-H., Park C.J., Paik S.-Y., Ryu S. Isolation and Genome Characterization of the Virulent Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophage SA97. Viruses. 2015;7:5225–5242. doi: 10.3390/v7102870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chang Y., Ryu S. Characterization of a novel cell wall binding domain-containing Staphylococcus aureus endolysin LysSA97. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101:147–158. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7747-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Singh P.K., Tack B.F., McCray P.B.J., Welsh M.J. Synergistic and additive killing by antimicrobial factors found in human airway surface liquid. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2000;279:L799–L805. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.279.5.L799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schmelcher M., Donovan D.M., Loessner M.J. Bacteriophage endolysins as novel antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:1147–1171. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang H., Zhang H., Wang J., Yu J., Wei H. A novel chimeric lysin with robust antibacterial activity against planktonic and biofilm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:40182. doi: 10.1038/srep40182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schmelcher M., Tchang V.S., Loessner M.J. Domain shuffling and module engineering of Listeria phage endolysins for enhanced lytic activity and binding affinity. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011;4:651–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang H., Zhang Y., Yu J., Huang Y., Zhang X.-E., Wei H. Novel Chimeric Lysin with High-Level Antimicrobial Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:536–542. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01793-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Singh P.K., Donovan D.M., Kumar A. Intravitreal injection of the chimeric phage endolysin Ply187 protects mice from Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:4621–4629. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00126-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yoong P., Schuch R., Nelson D., Fischetti V.A. Identification of a Broadly Active Phage Lytic Enzyme with Lethal Activity against Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:4808–4812. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4808-4812.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Celia L.K., Nelson D., Kerr D.E. Characterization of a bacteriophage lysin (Ply700) from Streptococcus uberis. Vet. Microbiol. 2008;130:107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu M., Lu H., Huang Q. Expression and Antibacterial Activity of CHAP Catalytic Domain of Staphylococcus aureus Phage Lysin Ply187. Biotechnol. Bull. 2016;32:232–238. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thandar M., Lood R., Winer B.Y., Deutsch D.R., Euler C.W., Fischetti V.A. Novel Engineered Peptides of a Phage Lysin as Effective Antimicrobials against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2671–2679. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02972-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Archer N.K., Mazaitis M.J., Costerton J.W., Leid J.G., Powers M.E., Shirtliff M.E. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence. 2011;2:445–459. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Łusiak-Szelachowska M., Weber-Dąbrowska B., Górski A. Bacteriophages and Lysins in Biofilm Control. Virol. Sin. 2020;35:125–133. doi: 10.1007/s12250-019-00192-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Manoharadas S., Witte A., Bläsi U. Antimicrobial activity of a chimeric enzybiotic towards Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biotechnol. 2009;139:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Daniel A., Euler C., Collin M., Chahales P., Gorelick K.J., Fischetti V.A. Synergism between a Novel Chimeric Lysin and Oxacillin Protects against Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1603–1612. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01625-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Srinivasan R., Chaitanyakumar A., Subramanian P., Mageswari A., Gomathi A., Aswini V., Sankar A.M., Ramya M., Gothandam K.M. Recombinant engineered phage-derived enzybiotic in Pichia pastoris X-33 as whole cell biocatalyst for effective biocontrol of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in aquaculture. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;154:1576–1585. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carpenter J.F., Pikal M.J., Chang B.S., Randolph T.W. Rational Design of Stable Lyophilized Protein Formulations: Some Practical Advice. Pharm. Res. 1997;14:969–975. doi: 10.1023/A:1012180707283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kiefer F., Arnold K., Künzli M., Bordoli L., Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D387–D392. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.