Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2021 Mar 24;8(3):202030. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202030

Development of paclitaxel-loaded poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite core–shell nanoparticles as a stimuli-responsive drug delivery system

Sungho Lee 1,, Tatsuya Miyajima 1, Ayae Sugawara-Narutaki 2, Katsuya Kato 1, Fukue Nagata 1,
PMCID: PMC8074949  PMID: 33959355

Abstract

Biodegradable nanoparticles have been well studied as biocompatible delivery systems. Nanoparticles of less than 200 nm in size can facilitate the passive targeting of drugs to tumour tissues and their accumulation therein via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Recent studies have focused on stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (DDS) for improving the effectiveness of chemotherapy; for example, pH-sensitive DDS depend on the weakly acidic and neutral extracellular pH of tumour and normal tissues, respectively. In our previous work, core–shell nanoparticles composed of the biodegradable polymer poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and the widely used inorganic biomaterial hydroxyapatite (HAp, which exhibits pH sensitivity) were prepared using a surfactant-free method. These PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles could load 750 wt% of a hydrophobic model drug. In this work, the properties of the PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles loaded with the anti-cancer drug paclitaxel (PTX) were thoroughly investigated in vitro. Because the PTX-containing nanoparticles were approximately 80 nm in size, they can be expected to facilitate efficient drug delivery via the EPR effect. The core–shell nanoparticles were cytotoxic towards cancer cells (4T1). This was due to the pH sensitivity of the HAp shell, which is stable in neutral conditions and dissolves in acidic conditions. The cytotoxic activity of the PTX-loaded nanoparticles was sustained for up to 48 h, which was suitable for tumour growth inhibition. These results suggest that the core–shell nanoparticles can be suitable drug carriers for various water-insoluble drugs.

Keywords: biomaterials, hydroxyapatite, poly(lactic acid), anti-cancer, drug delivery system

1. Introduction

Biodegradable nanoparticles have received much attention for their abilities to function as biocompatible delivery systems for biomolecules such as proteins, peptides, nucleic acids and oligonucleotides and to allow sustained drug release [13]. In particular, researchers have been taking advantage of the so-called enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, where particles of up to 200 nm in size are able to diffuse into and accumulate in lymph vessels of tumour tissues [35] owing to the leaky and defective tumour blood vessel structures that form as a result of rapid vascularization to serve fast-growing tumour tissue [5]. Recently, the focus had been placed on stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (DDS), such as those that are pH-sensitive or photo-responsive, for improving the effectiveness of chemotherapy [5,6]. For example, the extracellular pH of tumour tissue is weakly acidic at 6.5, whereas that of normal tissue remains constant at 7.2–7.4 [5,6]. Additionally, nanocarriers can be incorporated into the tumour cells via endocytosis and use the numerous pH gradients in cells; for example, the pH values of endosomes, lysosomes and mitochondria are 5.5–6.0, 4.5–5.0 and 8.0, respectively [5]. Hence, the size of the nanoparticles and their pH sensitivity can be strategies for designing drug carriers for DDS.

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) and their copolymer PLGA are widely used in the construction of DDS, owing to their biodegradability in the body [1]. For PLA and PLGA particles prepared using the solvent evaporation method, the size of the particles decreases with the increase of a stabilizer, such as poly(vinyl alcohol) [7]. However, the preparation of particles with a size smaller than 200 nm requires a large amount of stabilizers, which are non-biodegradable and tend to remain in the resultant nanoparticles [7]. In our previous work, PLA/hydroxyapatite (HAp) core–shell nanoparticles were prepared using a surfactant-free method [810]. HAp, which is a mineral component of bone and teeth, is used widely as an inorganic biomaterial owing to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability [11]. Moreover, HAp-containing drug carriers have been reported to have pH-sensitive drug release profiles [12,13], since HAp is stable under neutral pH conditions and dissolves in acidic environments [11]. For a drug carrier to be efficient, it should have a high drug-loading capacity and sustained drug-releasing capability [3,5] in addition to biodegradability and responsiveness to stimuli. Our previous PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles loaded a model hydrophobic drug (phylloquinone) of approximately 750 wt% and exhibited sustained release of the drug at 0.8% d−1 with a linear profile [9]. Hence, PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles can be excellent drug carrier candidates for DDS.

In this work, we carried out a fundamental investigation on the in vitro properties of PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles loaded with an anti-cancer agent. Paclitaxel (PTX) was chosen as the model drug for loading, as it is a widely used anti-cancer agent [14]. This drug is poorly soluble in water and requires dissolution in ethanol and polyoxyethylated castor oil for administration to patients, which can cause serious side effects [15]. Therefore, the core–shell nanoparticles are expected to carry PTX without the need for ethanol and polyoxyethylated castor oil. The structure of the PTX-loaded PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles was evaluated and their effect on the viability of murine breast cancer cells was examined in vitro.

2. Experimental methods

2.1. Preparation of the PTX-loaded PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles

PTX-loaded PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles were prepared with modified surfactant-free emulsification methods, as described in our previous reports [9,10]. The PLA, PTX, calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) ion solutions used for fabrication of the core–shell nanoparticles were prepared as follows. PLA (Resomer R 202 H, Mw = 10–18 kDa, Sigma-Aldrich) and PTX (BLDpharm) were separately dissolved in acetone at the concentrations of 20 and 1 mg ml−1, respectively. Ca and P ions solutions were prepared dissolving 0.20 M calcium acetate monohydrate (Ca(CH3COO)2 · H2O, Wako Pure Chemical) and 0.12 M diammonium hydrogen phosphate ((NH4)2HPO4, Wako Pure Chemical), respectively, in ultrapure water.

The PLA and PTX solutions were added to ultrapure water, followed by aqueous Ca ion solution added. Next, aqueous P ion solution was added dropwise under stirring at 25°C. The final concentrations of PLA, PTX, Ca ion and P ion were 0.1 mg ml−1, x wt% of PLA (x = 0–5), 2.0 and 1.2 mM, respectively. After 72 h of stirring at 25°C to remove the undesirable acetone, each mixture was filtered through a 40 µm mesh and then centrifuged (6000 r.p.m., 10 min). Thereafter, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed with ultrapure water. The various nanoparticle assemblies were resuspended at a concentration of approximately 2 mg ml−1 (denoted by PTXx@HAp, x = 0–5 wt% of PLA). Removed supernatant of PTX0.0@HAp was filtered using ultrafiltration (Vivaspin 20, Sartorius, 10 kDa MWCO). The filtered supernatant was measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (IRIS Advantage, Nippon Jarrell-Ash) to confirm the Ca/P ratio of the particle.

2.2. Structural characterization of the PTXx@HAp nanoparticles

The morphology of the PTXx@HAp nanoparticles was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4300, Hitachi). PTXx@HAp solutions were directly dropped on the sample stage and dried overnight, and then they were coated with an amorphous osmium layer (Neoc-Pro, Miewafosis). The diameters of the drug-loaded nanoparticles were measured using ImageJ software (NIH). PTX0.0@HAp solution was directly dropped on carbon grid and dried; subsequently, the sample was observed with transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL). The weight ratio of HAp to (PLA + PTX) in the carrier assembly was evaluated by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis (TG-DTA8122, Rigaku). The crystalline structure of PTXx@HAp was evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (CuKα, SmartLab SE/B1, Rigaku). The bonding structure of PTXx@HAp was analysed by Fourier transform infrared (FT–IR) spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance (FT/IR-4700, JASCO) and by Raman spectroscopy (785 nm, XploRA, HORIBA). Freeze-dried PTXx@HAp powders were used for the TG, XRD, and FT–IR and Raman spectroscopy measurements.

2.3. Cell cultures and cytotoxicity tests

Murine breast cancer cells (4T1 cell line, CRL-2539, ATCC) were used for testing the cytotoxic effects of PTXx@HAp on cancerous cells. Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Wako Pure Chemical) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) was used to culture the 4T1 cells. The PTXx@HAp nanoparticles were first sterilized by autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min (LSX300, TOMY SEIKO) and then centrifuged (6000 r.p.m., 5 min). After removal of the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in a culture medium at various concentrations (20–1000 µg ml−1). 4T1 cells were seeded (2 × 104 cells ml−1 in 100 µl of culture medium; n = 5) into 96-well plates and cultivated for 24 h (37°C, 5% CO2). Then, the medium was replaced with a medium containing either PTXx@HAp or PTX alone (at various concentrations) and further cultivated for 24 or 48 h. The PTX-containing media used for comparison in the cell viability test were prepared by diluting a 5 mg ml−1 filter-sterilized PTX–ethanol solution to various concentrations (0.05–25 µg ml−1).

For the test of 4T1 cell viability, the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo) was used. In brief, after culture of the 4T1 cells for a prescribed time, they were washed with the medium and replenished with 100 µl of RPMI-1640 medium (no phenol red, Wako Pure Chemical), following which 10 µl of CCK-8 reagent was added. After 2 h of incubation, 100 µl of the reacted solution was transferred to a new 96-well plate and the absorbance at 450 nm was recorded. The number of live cells, which was determined from a standard curve of cell number versus absorbance of the resulting medium, was used to calculate the cell viability as a percentage of the control.

2.4. Fluorescence imaging of the core–shell nanoparticles and cancer cells

For fluorescence imaging, fluorescein-loaded PLA/HAp core–shell (denoted by Flu@HAp) nanoparticles were prepared. Fluorescein (Tokyo Chemical Industry) was dissolved in acetone at 1 mg ml−1. PLA and fluorescein solutions were added to ultrapure water, followed by Ca and P ions solutions were added, as the same process as PTXx@HAp. 4T1 cells were seeded (1 × 104 cells ml−1 in 500 µl of culture medium) on a cover glass (φ 15 mm) in 24-well plate and cultivated for 24 h (37°C, 5% CO2). Next, the medium was replaced with a medium containing 1000 µg ml−1 Flu@HAp and further cultivated for 24 h. Then, the cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min. The cells on cover glass were washed three times with PBS-0.05% Triton X-100 (PBST), and incubated with Phalloidin-iFluor 594 Reagent (abcam) and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Wako Pure Chemical). Finally, the cells were washed with PBST and mounted in ProLong Gold (Invitrogen). Fluorescent images were taken using a fluorescence microscope (BZ-X800, Keyence).

3. Results and discussion

SEM images of PTXx@HAp are shown in figure 1a–d. The diameters of the nanoparticle assemblies are shown in table 1, and their size distribution is shown in figure 1e–h. TEM image of PTX0.0@HAp is shown in figure 2. Grey spherical parts, i.e. PLA core, were approximately 35 nm diameter, and black shell parts, i.e. HAp shell, were approximately 6 nm thickness. These sizes showed good agreement with our previous reports, where the PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles of 50 nm in diameter had a shell of 5 nm thickness [16]. PTXx@HAp core–shell nanoparticles were successfully prepared using a surfactant-free method, and their spherical shape was maintained despite the introduction of PTX. No other constructs, such as rod-shaped HAp and polymer aggregates, were observed. Moreover, the PTXx@HAp particle size was approximately the same or only slightly smaller with the introduction of PTX. The weight ratios of HAp : (PLA + PTX) for the various PTXx@HAp assemblies were all approximately 1 : 1 (table 1), similar to the results from our previous work [10]. This indicates that the addition of PTX up to 5 wt% of PLA does not induce morphological changes of the PTXx@HAp core–shell nanoparticles. It is known that nanoparticles of less than 200 nm in size exhibit the EPR effect in tumour tissue [35]. Given that the PTXx@HAp assemblies are in the much smaller size range of 75–85 nm, they are expected to facilitate passive targeting to tumour tissues and accumulation of the drug therein via the EPR effect.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

SEM images of (a) PTX0.0@HAp, (b) PTX1.0@HAp, (c) PTX2.5@HAp and (d) PTX5.0@HAp. Particle diameter distribution of (e) PTX0.0@HAp, (f) PTX1.0@HAp, (g) PTX2.5@HAp and (h) PTX5.0@HAp. Bar graphs represent the appearance frequency, and blue solid lines represent the cumulative frequency.

Table 1.

Particle diameters and HAp : (PLA + PTX) weight ratios of the various PTXx@HAp assemblies.

SPL code diameter (nm) HAp : (PLA + PTX)
PTX0.0@HAp 83.0 ± 26.3 53 : 47
PTX1.0@HAp 83.2 ± 23.4 54 : 46
PTX2.5@HAp 80.9 ± 36.2 51 : 49
PTX5.0@HAp 74.4 ± 24.1 52 : 48

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

TEM image of PTX0.0@HAp.

The Ca/P ratio of PTX0.0@HAp was approximately 1.63, which was similar to the stoichiometric composition of hydroxyapatite with the value of 1.67. The XRD patterns of PTXx@HAp (figure 3) showed good agreement with those previously established for HAp (JCPDS database file no. 9-432) and also showed similar patterns with our previous PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles [9]. The XRD patterns of PTXx@HAp were not sharp, which are similar to biological hydroxyapatite [17], and indicated that HAp shell had low crystallinity. Additionally, the HAp shell formed on the end group of PLA [9], i.e. carboxyl group [18], and the shell composed polycrystalline HAp. The peaks of PTXx@HAp showed no significant difference in the spectral patterns between nanoparticles with or without PTX. Remarkably, the peaks assigned to 002 and 004 were sharp and narrow in shape compared with the other peaks, which suggested that the crystalline c-axis arrangement of HAp in PTXx@HAp had a more ordered arrangement than that of the other axes. In our previous work, PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles of 50 nm in size had a uniform shell of 5 nm thickness [16]. Thus, the shell layer of PTXx@HAp is considered to be uniformly stacked in the direction of the ordered arrangement of the c-axis of the HAp crystal.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

X-ray diffraction patterns of various PTXx@HAp assemblies.

In the FT–IR spectra of PTXx@HAp and PLA (figure 4a), FT-IR bands corresponding to phosphate groups [10,19,20] and PLA [21,22] were observed; these were assigned to O–P–O bending in PO4 (560, 600 cm−1), the PO4 symmetric stretching mode (1025 cm−1), the C=O bending mode (750 cm−1), the C–COO stretching mode (870 cm−1), CH3 rocking with the C–C stretching mode (955 cm−1), the C–CH3 stretching mode (1045 cm−1), the COC symmetric stretching mode (1080 cm−1), the CH3 asymmetric bending mode (1125 cm−1), the COC asymmetric stretching mode with CH3 asymmetric bending mode (1190 cm−1), the CH bending mode with COC stretching mode (1270 cm−1), the CH and CH3 bending mode (1360 cm−1), the CH3 symmetric bending mode (1380 cm−1), the CH3 asymmetric bending mode (1452 cm−1) and the C=O stretching mode (1755 cm−1). In the laser Raman spectra of PTXx@HAp, PLA and PTX (figure 4b), bands corresponding to phosphate groups [23,24] and PLA [21,22] were observed; these were assigned to the symmetric stretching mode of the P–O bond (586 cm−1), the PO4 symmetric stretching mode (958 cm−1), the C=O bending mode (738 cm−1), the C–COO stretching mode (870 cm−1), the C–CH3 stretching mode (1042 cm−1), the C–O–C symmetric stretching mode (1088 cm−1) and the CH3 rocking mode (1125 cm−1). The FT–IR and Raman spectra of PTXx@HAp showed bands corresponding to the phosphate group, PLA and PTX. The peaks for the phosphate groups observed from the FT–IR (560, 600, 1025 cm−1) and Raman (586, 958 cm−1) spectra in PTXx@HAP corresponded to the tetrahedral arrangement of PO43−, which is the representative phosphate structure in HAp. The intensity of the bands corresponding to PLA in PTXx@HAp was not significantly different from that of free PLA. Additionally, the band positions corresponding to PLA in PTXx@HAp were not shifted in relation to the band position of free PLA. Therefore, we had successfully constructed PTXx@HAp core–shell nanoparticles composed of a PLA core and an HAp shell.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) FT–IR and (b) Raman spectra of various PTXx@HAp assemblies.

PTXx@HAp with x ≥ 1 showed bands corresponding to sp3-hybridized C–C vibration (1000 cm−1) [25], which is the main band for PTX. The intensity of 1000 cm−1 increased with increasing PTX content, indicating that PTX had been successfully incorporated into PTXx@HAp. Moreover, the amount of anti-cancer drug loaded can be manipulated through the introduction amount. The PLA/HAp particles reported previously could load 750 wt% of a hydrophobic model drug [9]; the PTXx@HAp assembly can facilitate a higher PTX-loading amount. Consequently, PTXx@HAp core–shell nanoparticles were successfully prepared without morphological changes caused by the incorporation of PTX, and the nanoparticles are expected to accumulate in tumour tissue via the EPR effect.

The viability of 4T1 cells cultured with the PTXx@HAp or free PTX solutions is shown in figure 5a,b. There were no significant differences in cell viability percentages between the PTX0.0@HAp-exposed cells and control cells. By contrast, cells exposed to PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) exhibited significantly lower viability percentages compared with the control cells. This indicated that the PTX in PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) had been released from the nanoparticles and executed its cytotoxic activity against the cancer cells. This was due to the high solubility of the HAp shell in the acidic environment of the 4T1 cells [5,6,11].

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Viability of 4T1 cells cultured with PTXx@HAp or PTX-containing medium for (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h, and their viability at (c) 24 h and (d) 48 h as a function of the PTX content. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Student's t-test was used for comparisons between (a,b) PTXx@HAp and the control (n = 5, *p < 0.01), and (c,d) between PTXx@HAp and PTX solutions of similar concentration (n = 5, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01).

Figure 5c,d shows the viability of cells cultured with the PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) and PTX solutions as a function of PTX content. The PTX content of PTXx@HAp was calculated using the HAp : (PLA + PTX) weight ratio of 1 : 1, as measured by TG analysis, where the PTX content represents the full amount loaded onto the particles. The percentage viability of cells exposed to PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) at 24 h was similar to or slightly lower than that of cells exposed to a similar concentration of PTX solution. In particular, cells cultured with PTX5.0@HAp with a PTX content greater than 5 µg ml−1 exhibited significantly lower viability at 24 h compared with those exposed to PTX solutions of a similar concentration. At 48 h, the cells cultured with PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) with a PTX content greater than 0.5 µg ml−1 also exhibited significantly lower viability than the cells exposed to equivalent PTX solutions. Cell viability under PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) exposure generally decreased with increasing culture time (exception of the PTX1.0@HAp with 20 µg ml−1 PTX group), whereas that under PTX solution exposure increased with time. The cytotoxic activity of PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1, PTX content > 0.5 µg ml−1) against 4T1 cells lasted up to 48 h (as cell viability decreased from 24 to 48 h), whereas the viability of cells exposed to the PTX solution increased from 24 to 48 h. Figure 6 shows fluorescence images of 4T1 cells cultured with Flu@HAp-containing medium. The core–shell nanoparticles were attached and/or incorporated into the cells. PTXx@HAp nanoparticles can be located around and/or inside of 4T1 cells, similar to Flu@HAp. As a result, PTX concentration around the cells exposed to PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) may be larger than those around the cells exposed to PTX solutions. Additionally, the core–shell nanoparticles showed sustained releasability of loaded drug [9]. Therefore, the PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) nanoparticles exhibited cytotoxic activity to cancer cells until 48 h, due to sustain releasability of PTX.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Fluorescence image of 4T1 cells cultured with Flu@HAp containing medium. Red, F-actin; blue, nuclei; green, Flu@HAp core–shell nanoparticle (fluorescein).

Luo et al. [26] reported that the viability of 4T1 cells cultured with epigallocatechin gallate in combination with PTX (0.9 µg ml−1) was only 20%, and their system also successfully decreased the tumour volume and weight in vivo. Our PTXx@HAp (PTX content > 1.0 µg ml−1) construct resulted in a cell viability percentage of approximately 20% at 48 h, indicating its effectiveness for inhibiting tumour cell growth. These results suggest that these PTXx@HAp core–shell nanoparticles can be carrier candidates for various water-insoluble drugs.

4. Conclusion

PTX-containing PLA/HAp core–shell nanoparticles were prepared using a surfactant-free method. The approximately 80 nm size of the PTXx@HAp assembly could be expected to facilitate passive targeting of the drug to tumour tissues via the EPR effect. According to the structural analysis, PTXx@HAp consists of a PLA core and an HAp shell, and the amount of PTX loaded onto the nanoparticles can be manipulated through the amount introduced in the fabrication process. PTXx@HAp exhibited cytotoxic activity against cancer cells. This was due to the pH sensitivity of the HAp shell, which dissolves in the typically acidic environment of cancer cells, thereby releasing the drug. The cytotoxic activity of PTXx@HAp (x ≥ 1) against 4T1 cells could be sustained for 48 h and is, therefore, expected to be suitable for use in the inhibition of tumour cell growth.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Mr T. Matsubara (Nagoya Institute Technology) for providing TEM analysis of the nanoparticles.

Contributor Information

Sungho Lee, Email: sungho.lee@aist.go.jp.

Fukue Nagata, Email: f.nagata@aist.go.jp.

Data accessibility

The datasets supporting this article have been uploading as part of the electronic supplementary material.

Authors' contributions

S.L. carried out the nanoparticle synthesis and structural analysis, and cell culture test, participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript; T.M., A.S.-N. and K.K. participated in the design of the study and critically revised the manuscript. F.N. conceived of the study, designed the study, coordinated the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication and agree to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Funding

This work was supported by JST A-STEP grant no. JPMJTS1624.

References

  • 1.Silva JM, Videira M, Gaspar R, Préat V, Florindo HF. 2013. Immune system targeting by biodegradable nanoparticles for cancer vaccines. J. Control Release 168, 179-199. ( 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Sriwastawa B, Bhati L, Pandey S, Pandey P, Bannerjee SK. 2012. Drug delivery systems: an updated review. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2, 2-11. ( 10.4103/2230-973X.96920) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Asadi N, Davaran S, Panahi Y, Hasanzadeh A, Malakootikhah J, Fallah Moafi H, Akbarzadeh A. 2017. Application of nanostructured drug delivery systems in immunotherapy of cancer: a review. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 45, 18-23. ( 10.1080/21691401.2016.1178136) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matsumura Y, Maeda H. 1986. New concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent Smancs. Cancer Res. 46, 6387-6392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang L, Li Y, Yu JC. 2014. Chemical modification of inorganic nanostructures for targeted and controlled drug delivery in cancer treatment. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 452-470. ( 10.1039/C3TB21196G) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang Z, Deng X, Ding J, Zhou W, Zheng X, Tang G. 2018. Mechanisms of drug release in pH-sensitive micelles for tumour targeted drug delivery system: a review. Int. J. Pharm. 535, 253-260. ( 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rao JP, Geckeler KE. 2011. Polymer nanoparticles: preparation techniques and size-control parameters. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 887-913. ( 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nagata F, Miyajima T, Yokogawa Y. 2006. A method to fabricate hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic acid) microspheres intended for biomedical application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26, 533-535. ( 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.06.006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nagata F, Miyajima T, Kato K. 2016. Preparation of phylloquinone-loaded poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite core–shell particles and their drug release behavior. Adv. Powder Technol. 27, 903-907. ( 10.1016/j.apt.2016.02.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hanasaki M, Nagata F, Miyajima T, Kato K. 2018. Controlling particle size of poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn 43, 135-138. ( 10.14723/tmrsj.43.135) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.LeGeros RZ, LeGeros JP. 2012. An introduction to bioceramics, pp. 229-277. London, UK: Imperial College Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun W, Fan J, Wang S, Kang Y, Du J, Peng X. 2018. Biodegradable drug-loaded hydroxyapatite nanotherapeutic agent for targeted drug release in tumors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 7832-7840. ( 10.1021/acsami.7b19281) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu Z, Ma X, Ma Y, Yang Z, Yuan Y, Liu C. 2020. Core/Shell PEGS/HA hybrid nanoparticle via micelle-coordinated mineralization for tumor-specific therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 12 109-12 119. ( 10.1021/acsami.0c00068) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC. 1995. Paclitaxel (Taxol). N. Engl. J. Med. 332, 1004-1014. ( 10.1056/NEJM199504133321507) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dorr RT. 1994. Pharmacology and toxicology of cremophor EL diluent. Ann. Pharmacother. 28, S11-S14. ( 10.1177/10600280940280S503) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nagata F. 2020. Development of biodegradable core-shell particles for DDS applications. Bull. Ceram. Soc. Japan 55, 185-188. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T. 1990. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W3. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24, 721-734. ( 10.1002/jbm.820240607) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kokubo T, Takadama H. 2006. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27, 2907-2915. ( 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee S, Nakano T, Kasuga T. 2017. Structure, dissolution behavior, cytocompatibility, and antibacterial activity of silver-containing calcium phosphate invert glasses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 105, 3127-3135. ( 10.1002/jbm.a.36173) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maçon ALB, Lee S, Poologasundarampillai G, Kasuga T, Jones JR. 2017. Synthesis and dissolution behaviour of CaO/SrO-containing sol–gel-derived 58S glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 8858-8870. ( 10.1007/s10853-017-0869-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kister G, Cassanas G, Vert M. 1998. Effects of morphology, conformation and configuration on the IR and Raman spectra of various poly(lactic acid)s. Polymer 39, 267-273. ( 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00229-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yuniarto K, Purwanto YA, Purwanto S, Welt BA, Purwadaria HK, Sunarti TC. 2016. Infrared and Raman studies on polylactide acid and polyethylene glycol-400 blend. AIP Conf. Proc. 1725, 020101. ( 10.1063/1.4945555) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee S, Nakano T, Kasuga T. 2017. Formation and structural analysis of 15MgO–15CaO–8P2O5–4SiO2 glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 457, 73-76. ( 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.11.020) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee S, Maçon ALB, Kasuga T. 2016. Structure and dissolution behavior of orthophosphate MgO–CaO–P2O5–Nb2O5 glass and glass-ceramic. Mater. Lett. 175, 135-138. ( 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.027) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ling J, Weitman SD, Miller MA, Moore RV, Bovik AC. 2002. Direct Raman imaging techniques for study of the subcellular distribution of a drug. Appl. Opt. 41, 6006-6017. ( 10.1364/AO.41.006006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luo T, Wang J, Yin Y, Hua H, Jing J, Sun X, Li M, Zhang Y, Jiang Y. 2010. (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate sensitizes breast cancer cells to paclitaxel in a murine model of breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R8. ( 10.1186/bcr2473) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting this article have been uploading as part of the electronic supplementary material.


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES