Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250254

Identification of a novel non-invasive biological marker to overcome the shortcomings of PSA in diagnosis and risk stratification for prostate cancer: Initial prospective study of developmental endothelial locus-1 protein

Jae-Wook Chung 1,#, Hyun Tae Kim 1,#, Yun-Sok Ha 1, Eun Hye Lee 2, So Young Chun 2, Chan-Hyeong Lee 3, Kyeong Hyeon Byeon 1, Seock Hwan Choi 1, Jun Nyung Lee 1, Bum Soo Kim 1, Tae-Hwan Kim 1, Eun Sang Yoo 1, Ghil Suk Yoon 4, Moon-Chang Baek 3,‡,*, Tae Gyun Kwon 1,5,‡,*
Editor: Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh6
PMCID: PMC8075267  PMID: 33901217

Abstract

Objective

This prospective study sought to clarify the developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) protein as values of diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer (PCa).

Design

From February 2017 to December 2019, a total 458 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy or surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia agreed to research of Del-1 protein. We prospectively compared and analyzed the Del-1 protein and prostate specific antigen (PSA) in relation to the patients’ demographic and clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

Mean age was 68.86±8.55 years. Mean PSA and Del-1 protein was 21.72±89.37, 0.099±0.145, respectively. Two hundred seventy-six (60.3%) patients were diagnosed as PCa. Among them, 181 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). There were significant differences in Del-1 protein between benign and PCa group (0.066±0.131 vs 0.121±0.149, respectively, p<0.001). When we set the cut-off value of del-1 protein as 0.120, in patients with 3≤PSA≤8, positive predictive value and specificity of Del-1 protein (≥0.120) for predicting PCa were 88.9% (56/63) and 93.5% (101/108), respectively. Among 181 patients who underwent RP, there were significant differences in Del-1 protein according to stage (pT2 vs pT3a vs ≥pT3b) (0.113±0.078, 0.171±0.121, 0.227±0.161, respectively, p<0.001) and to Gleason score (6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4) vs 7 (4+3) or 8 (4+4) vs 9 or 10) (0.134±0.103, 0.150±0.109, 0.212±0.178, respectively, P = 0.044). Multivariate analysis showed that PSA, Del-1 protein and high Gleason score (≥9) were the independent prognostic factors for predicting higher pT stage (≥3b). Furthermore, age, PSA and Del-1 protein were independent prognostic factors for predicting significant PCa.

Conclusion

Patients with PCa showed higher expression of Del-1 protein than benign patients. Del-1 protein increased with the stage and Gleason score of PCa. Collaboration with PSA, Del-1 protein can be a non-invasive useful marker for diagnosis and risk stratification of PCa.

Introduction

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most widely used biomarker for the early detection and management of PCa. The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is precipitated by a persistent increase in the serum PSA level, which triggers the performance of a prostate biopsy. However, PSA screening is controversial due to its relative lack of cancer specificity. Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with potential PCa were not diagnosed as having PCa at the time of the initial prostate biopsy [1]. Furthermore, some study has shown that only 32.4% of patients with a PSA 4.0 ng/mL or higher had PCa [2]. Thus, current PSA screening is not cost-effective from a public health perspective [3] and many urologists are concerning for over-diagnosis of PCa with widespread serum PSA screening, which eventually could lead to overtreatment of PCa and its accompanied morbidities. And also, prostate biopsy under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is the only tool for diagnosing PCa, but it is invasive and can cause side effects such as infection and gross hematuria, and can give considerable discomfort to the patients during procedure.

To overcome these drawbacks of PSA, numerous biological markers have being developed to enhance the specificity of PCa screening such as free PSA, prostate health index, 4K score, prostate cancer antigen 3, SelectMDx®, ConfirmMDx®, TMPRSS2:ERG GENE FUSION, and ExoDx PROSTATE INTELLISCORE [4, 5]. However, these markers are expensive and rarely refunded in the general care system, thus these are rarely used in clinical practice. Given the limitations of PSA, the invasiveness of prostate biopsy and over-treatment of low-risk PCa and when considering that the need for excavating of new useful biomarkers is emerging [6], we focused on serum developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) protein.

In 2016, our center already published the Del-1 protein which is located in circulating extracellular vesicles as a novel biomarker for early breast cancer detection [7]. Considering the similarity of breast cancer and PCa, we hypothesized that serum Del-1 protein may be related to PCa and investigated whether Del-1 protein has any association with PCa.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, republic of Korea (IRB Number KNUH 2017-02-017). The study was carried out in agreement with the applicable laws and regulations, good clinical practices, and ethical principles as described in the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave their written informed consent after a thorough explanation of the study procedure involved.

Rationale

To achieve the scientific rationality of this study which focused on elevated serum Del-1 protein in patients with PCa, we performed the following process before the start of this study; 1) Identification of differences in Del-1 protein expression between benign prostatic tissue and PCa tissue, 2) Confirmation of decrease of Del-1 protein expression after radical prostatectomy (RP), and 3) Previous study which demonstrated the elevated Del-1 protein level in breast cancer that shared similar properties to PCa [7].

Study design

Fig 1 shows study algorithm. From February 2017 to December 2019, 610 patient agreed to participate in this prospective study. Of these patients, 152 patients who withdrew informed consent during the study or did not visit regularly were excluded and finally, 458 patients were included in present study. 19 patients were diagnosed as benign after surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) such as transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). 439 patients underwent TRUS guided prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA (≥3.0 ng/mL). Of these patients, 182 patients were diagnoses as no tumor and 276 patients as prostate adenocarcinoma. 181 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and 95 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or radiation therapy or docetaxel based chemotherapy.

Fig 1. Study design.

Fig 1

HoLEP, holmium laser enucleation of prostate; TURP, transurethral resection of prostate; PBx, prostate biopsy; PCa, prostate cancer; ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; RTx, radiation therapy.

Furthermore, we subdivided the patients who underwent RP into ‘clinically insignificant PCa’ and ‘significant PCa’ group according to RP specimen. Clinically insignificant PCa group must meet all three criteria below and may be eligible for active surveillance [8, 9]; 1) PSA<10 ng/dL, 2) Gleason 6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4), 3) pT stage 2. There were 42 patients who satisfied these three criteria. The remaining 139 patients were classified into significant PCa group.

Present study is the first fundamental step for biomarker development which is the identification of high-quality samples to perform high-quantity analysis, including proteomics and expression array analysis [10, 11]. In this study, a large amount of PCa patients’ serum was used for discovery of new biomarker before meta-analysis.

Method for detection of serum Del-1 protein

Fig 2 shows enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method for detecting Serum Del-1 protein [7]. For quantification of serum Del-1 protein on extracellular vesicle (EV), 96-well plates were coated overnight with polyclonal anti-CD63 (ab68418; Abcam) antibody at 200 ng/well in 0.2 mol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). The plates were blocked for 2 hours at room temperature with 200 μL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T). Serum was diluted 1:10 with blocking buffer. The diluted serum (100 μL) was added to the plates in triplicate and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. And then the plates were reacted for 2 hours with monoclonal anti–Del-1 (ab88667; Abcam) antibody at 200 ng/well and washed five times with PBS-T. The plates were reacted for 1 hour with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody. After washing with PBS-T seven times, the plates were developed with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine containing hydrogen peroxide. The reaction was stopped with 1 mol/L phosphoric acid, and optical density values were measured at 450 nm on an automated iMark plate reader (BioRad).

Fig 2. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) protein.

Fig 2

Method for detection of Del-1 protein expression in prostatic tissue

The prostate tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin solution to form paraffin tissue blocks through dehydration, clearing and embedding processes. The tissue blocks were sectioned into 4μm thickness. Paraffin was removed by clearing process and hydrated in distilled water, and the antigen was retrieved in pH 6.0 citrate buffer solution before permeabilization with Triton-x solution. Followed by permeabilization, tissue slides were applied with blocking solution before being stained with anti-del-1 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and andi-CD63 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) for overnight at 4°C. FITC labelled secondary antibodies were applied for 2 h at room temperature and the slides were mounted by using mounting solution with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables (age, PSA, Del-1 protein) were analyzed by a Student’s t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparisons of non-continuous variables (categorical Del-1 protein, Gleason score, pT stage) were analyzed by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Cut-off value for Del-1 protein was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for predicting advanced disease (pT ≥ 3b) and significant PCa. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 and Fig 3 show basic characteristics of the patients with benign and PCa. Mean age was 68.86±8.55years and there were significant differences in patients’ age between the two groups (64.49±9.12 vs 71.08±7.36, p<0.001). Mean body mass index was 24.26±2.62 kg/m2 and prostate volume measured by TRUS was 35.78±15.24 mL. Mean PSA was 21.72±89.37 ng/mL and there were significant differences in PSA between the two groups (6.11±7.83 vs 32.64±113.86, p<0.001). Mean PSA density was 0.80±3.91ng/mL2 and there were significant differences between the two groups (0.21±0.41 vs 1.18±4.99, p = 0.001). Mean Del-1 protein was 0.099±0.145 ng/mL and there were significant differences in PSA between the two groups (0.066±0.131 vs 0.121±0.149, p<0.001). Among the PCa patients, 32 patients (11.59%) showed non-regional lymph node or distant metastasis.

Table 1. Basic characteristics of the patients (benign versus prostate cancer).

  Total Benign PCa p value
N 458 (100.0) 182 (39.7) 276 (60.3) -
Age 68.86±8.55 64.49±9.12 71.08±7.36 <0.001
Body mass index 24.26±2.62 24.30±2.61 24.23±2.63 0.771
Prostate volume 35.78±15.24 34.96±13.83 36.32±16.11 0.336
PSA 21.72±89.37 6.11±7.83 32.64±113.86 <0.001
PSA density 0.80±3.91 0.21±0.41 1.18±4.99 0.001
Del-1 protein 0.099±0.145 0.066±0.131 0.121±0.149 <0.001
Del-1 protein <0.001
    <0.120 331 168 163
    ≥0.120 127 14 113
Non-regional lymph node or distant metastasis - - 32 (11.59) -

Fig 3. Basic characteristics of the patients (benign versus prostate cancer).

Fig 3

PCa, prostate cancer.

The best cut-off value of Del-1 protein was computed to be 0.120 in accordance with the ROC curve. And the area under the ROC curve was 0.680 (95% CI 0.632–0.728; p<0.001) (Sensitivity: 41.7%, Specificity: 90.7%) (Fig 4). PCa group had higher portion of patients with Del-1 protein≥0.120 than benign group (p<0.001). Among the 182 patients diagnosed as benign, only 14 (7.7%) patients showed Del-1 protein 0.120 or higher.

Fig 4. The best cut-off value for detecting developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) protein according to the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Fig 4

Fig 5 shows immunohistochemistry (IHC) results in benign prostate tissue and prostate adenocarcinoma according to pT stage and Gleason score. In IHC analysis using anti-Del-1 antibody (or anti-CD63 antibody), expression of Del-1 protein was higher in PCa tissue than in benign tissue. Furthermore, expression of Del-1 protein increased as the cancer stage and Gleason score increased.

Fig 5. Immunohistochemistry results in in benign prostate tissue and prostate adenocarcinoma according to pT stage and Gleason score.

Fig 5

Table 2 is the distribution of patients when cut-off value of Del-1 protein and PSA is set at 0.120 and 3.0 ng/mL, respectively. When PSA is 3 or more, PCa group had a significant high proportion of patient with Del-1≧0.120 (p<0.001) and positive predictive value of Del-1≧0.120 for predicting PCa is 91.8% (112/122). When PSA is less than 3, specificity of Del-1<0.120 was 90.0% (36/40).

Table 2. Distribution of patients when cut-off value of Del-1 protein and PSA is 0.120 and 3.0.

Total Benign PCa p value
PSA≥3 406 142 264 -
    Del-1 protein <0.001
    Del-1<0.120 284 132 152
    Del-1≥0.120 122 10 112
PSA<3 52 40 12
    Del-1 protein 0.999*
47 36 11
Del-1≥0.120 5 4 1

* Fisher’s exact test

Table 3 shows the distribution of patients when PSA is set between 3 and 8 (PSA gray zone). PCa group had a significant high proportion of patient with Del-1≧0.120 (p<0.001) and positive predictive value of Del-1≧0.120 for predicting PCa is 88.9% (56/63). Specificity of Del-1<0.120 was 93.5% (101/108).

Table 3. Distribution of patients within PSA gray zone (3≤PSA≤8).

Total Benign PCa p value
3≤PSA≤8 237 108 129 -
    Del-1 <0.001
        Del-1<0.120 174 101 73
        Del-1≥0.120 63 7 56

Fig 6A and 6B shows level of Del-1 protein according to pT stage (A) and Gleason score (B) in 181 patients who underwent RP. 100 patients were diagnosed as pT2, 56 as pT3a, 25 as ≥ pT3b. PSA level increased significantly with the higher pT stage (6.47±3.75, 11.71±8.90, 16.10±16.67, respectively, p<0.001) (Table 4A). Furthermore, there were also significant differences in Del-1 protein according to stage (0.113±0.078, 0.171±0.121, 0.227±0.161, respectively, p<0.001) (Table 4A). 95 patients were diagnosed as Gleason 6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4), 71 as 7 (4+3) or 8 (4+4), 15 as 9 or 10. PSA level increased significantly with the higher Gleason score (6.70±3.94, 11.86±11.83, 15.14±11.41, respectively, p<0.001) (Table 4B). Furthermore, there were also significant differences in Del-1 protein according to Gleason score (0.134±0.103, 0.150±0.109, 0.212±0.178, respectively, p = 0.044) (Table 4B).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Developmental endothelial locus-1 protein according to (A) pT stage and (B) Gleason score in 181 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Table 4. Developmental endothelial locus-1 protein according to (A) pT stage and (B) Gleason score in 181 patients who underwent radical prostateectomy.

(A) pT stage
  pT2 pT3a ≥ pT3b p value
N 100 56 25 -
Age 69.76±7.44 71.73±6.43 72.48±6.09 0.999
PSA 6.47±3.75 11.71±8.90 16.10±16.67 <0.001
Del-1 protein 0.113±0.078 0.171±0.121 0.227±0.161 <0.001
(B) Gleason score
  6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4) 7 (4+3) or 8 (4+4) 9 or 10 p value
N 95 71 15 -
Age 70.87±6.96 70.30±7.30 72.07±6.30 0.655
PSA 6.70±3.94 11.86±11.83 15.14±11.41 <0.001
Del-1 protein 0.134±0.103 0.150±0.109 0.212±0.178 0.044

Table 5 shows multivariate logistic regression analysis of De1-1 protein as prognostic marker for predicting advanced disease (pT ≥ 3b). The multivariate analysis has shown that PSA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.045; 95% confidence internal [CI], 1.000–1.092; p = 0.050), Del-1 protein (HR, 87.833; 95% CI, 2.453–5060.403; p = 0.015), Gleason score (6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4) vs 9 or 10) (HR, 6.273; 95% CI, 1.516–25.419; p = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for predicting advanced disease (pT ≥ 3b).

Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of De1-1 protein as prognostic marker for advanced disease (pT ≥ 3b).

Total pT2 or pT3a ≥ pT3b p value HR (95% CI)
Univariate Multivariate
N 181 156 25 - - -
Age 70.75±7.02 70.47±7.14 72.48±6.09 0.184 - -
PSA 9.42±9.03 8.35±6.59 16.10±16.67 0.030 0.050 1.045 (1.000–1.092)
Del-1 protein 0.147±0.114 0.134±0.099 0.227±0.161 0.009 0.015 87.833 (2.453–5060.403)
Gleason score <0.001
    6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4) 95 88 7 Ref
    7 (4+3) or 8 (4+4) 71 60 11 0.373 1.639 (0.553–4.854)
    9 or 10 15 8 7 0.011 6.273 (1.516–25.419)

Table 6 shows multivariate logistic regression analysis of De1-1 protein as prognostic marker for predicting significant PCa. Age (HR, 1.045; 95% confidence internal [CI], 1.012–1.079; p = 0.007), PSA (HR, 1.277; 95% CI, 1.136–1.435; p<0.001), Del-1 protein (HR, 22.935; 95% CI, 2.248–234.001; p = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for predicting significant PCa.

Table 6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of De1-1 protein as prognostic marker for predicting significant prostate cancer.

Total (n = 363) Benign (n = 182) + Insignificant PCa (n = 42) Significant PCa (n = 139) p value HR (95% CI)
Univariate Multivariate
Age 68.66±8.77 66.77±9.11 71.70±7.23 <0.001 0.007 1.045 (1.012–1.079)
PSA 18.88±91.43 6.15±7.11 39.40±145.46 0.001 <0.001 1.277 (1.136–1.435)
Body mass index 24.23±2.62 24.26±2.54 24.19±2.75 0.812 - -
Prostate volume 35.35±15.09 35.64±14.81 34.90±15.57 0.655 - -
PSA Density 0.70±4.00 0.21±0.37 1.48±6.38 0.003 0.010 0.026 (0.002–0.409)
Del-1 protein 0.103±0.130 0.080±0.130 0.140±0.123 <0.001 0.008 22.935 (2.248–234.001)

Fig 7 shows the change of PSA and Del-1 protein in 14 patients who underwent RP and did not show biochemical recurrence. There were significant decrease between preoperative and postoperative 12 months serum PSA (9.80±9.32 vs 0.02±0.02, p = 0.002) and Del-1 protein (0.062±0.039 vs 0.029±0.025, p = 0.015) (Table 7).

Fig 7. Change of PSA and Del-1 protein in 14 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and did not show biochemical recurrence.

Fig 7

Table 7. Change of PSA and Del-1 protein in 14 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and did not show biochemical recurrence.

Initial POD 3 months POD 6 months POD 12 months p value
PSA 9.80±9.32 0.04±0.05 0.03±0.02 0.02±0.02 0.002*
Del-1 protein 0.062±0.039 0.058±0.047 0.049±0.062 0.029±0.025 0.015**

* Comparison of initial and POD 12 month PSA

** Comparison of initial and POD 12 month Del-1 protein

Discussion

Since PSA’s first introduction in the late 1980s, it has dramatically changed the natural course of PCa from a cancer which urologists used to detect somewhat later that we were difficult to offer appropriate curable treatments to a cancer which urologists detect too early that we are uncertain about how to manage it [6]. As PSA in being used widely around the world, unnecessary prostate biopsies are increasing which has eventually lead to an overtreatment of low risk PCa resulting in several unwarranted compromises to urinary and sexual quality of life such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Currently, especially in developed countries, PCa is characterized by its high incidence but overall low mortality. Therefore, to compensate for the weakness of PSA, novel diagnostic and prognostic markers are urgently needed.

Del-1 protein, also called epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats and discoidin I-like domain-3 (EDIL-3), is a 52 kDa extracellular matrix associated glycoprotein released from endothelial cells which was identified and isolated from the embryonic mouse lung in 1998 [12]. Del-1 protein is known to be have an anti-inflammatory effect. In 2008, Choi et al. revealed that Del-1 protein is an endogenous inhibitor of inflammatory cell recruitment and it could provide a basis for targeting leukocyte-endothelial interactions in several disease [13]. Since 2008, numerous studies were conducted to investigate the function of Del-1 such as homeostatic factor in the central nervous system by limiting neuro-inflammation and demyelination [14], inhibitor of ischemia related angiogenesis by blocking inflammation [15], inhibitory factor for preventing peritoneal adhesion [16] and biomarker of endothelial dysfunction, sepsis, and sepsis induced organ dysfunction [17].

Del-1 is known to be highly expressed in the brain and lung, however it is less expressed in the kidney, liver, intestine, spleen and blood in mice [13]. Furthermore, several studies have shown that Del-1 protein is associated with tumor angiogenesis and plays an important role in interaction between cancer cells and endothelial cells [1820]. Considering that chronic inflammation is a crucial mechanism for potentially leading to tumor development and progression, inhibition of inflammation could be important therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment [21]. Recent study demonstrated that Del-1 protein is associated with various cancers including bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer [2225]. However, the precise mechanism between the Del-1 protein and cancer is still in debate.

Extracellular vesicle (EV) is membrane vesicles released by numerous cells. Tumor cells and neighboring cells in the cancer microenvironment, release EVs which have functions of angiogenesis, pro-metastasis signaling, and suppressing immune system in an autocrine or paracrine manner [2628]. Tumor cell–derived EVs may have the potential useful values to be used a biological markers for early detection of various cancers because these membranous vesicles are released continuously into blood from early stages of cancer [29, 30]. Furthermore, a few studies exhibited the function of the Del-1 protein in tumor cells [24]. Del-1 protein is expressed in some cancer cells [18, 24, 31] proposing that it might have potential roles as tumor-specific biological marker for numerous cancers, including PCa. Furthermore, in 2014, Liu et al. evaluated that PCa-derived exosomes are highly embedded with cancer marker molecules, especially membranous proteins including prostate specific membrane antigen, advocating the characteristics of the original PCa cells. Therefore, identification of cancer derived exosomes can provide the crucial evidences for the research of novel cancer related biological markers [32].

On the bases of aforementioned various studies, we hypothesized that EV proteins, especially Del-1 protein, can be used as diagnostic biological markers for PCa. We applied a proteomic attempt to identify Del-1 protein as tumor specific proteins on circulating EV isolated from the patients’ serum with benign prostatic tissue as well as various stages of PCa. In 2016, our team evaluated the association between Del-1 protein and breast cancer [7]. Del-1 protein level in serum was calculated by ELISA from healthy controls (n = 81), breast cancer patients (n = 269), breast cancer patients after surgical resection (n = 50), patients with benign breast tumors (n = 64), and patients with noncancerous diseases (n = 98) in two cohorts. Expression of Del-1 protein was significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in all controls (p<0.001) and normalized after surgical resection. The diagnostic accuracy of Del-1 protein measured by area under the ROC curve, 0.961 [95% CI, 0.924–0.983], sensitivity of 94.70%, and specificity of 86.36% in test cohort and 0.968 (0.933–0.988), 92.31%, and 86.62% in validation cohort for early-stage breast cancer. Furthermore, Del-1 protein maintained diagnostic accuracy for patients with early-stage breast cancer using the other type of ELISA [0.946 (0.905–0.972), 90.90%, and 77.14% in the test cohort; 0.943 (0.900–0.971), 89.23%, and 80.99% in the validation cohort].

PCa and breast cancer are both solid malignancies of accessory sex organs and have characteristics of being epithelial primarily, hormone-driven cancers, which respond well to endocrine treatment [33]. PCa and breast cancer are both affected significantly by steroid hormones and removal or suppressing of gonads can reduces the risk of cancer development dramatically in both sexes. Anti-estrogens are beneficial and possibly preventive for breast cancer while anti-androgens are beneficial and possibly preventive for PCa. Considering these biological similarity that breast cancer and PCa both are hormone-sensitive disease [34] and are related to androgen receptor pathway [35], we presumed that Del-1 protein would be highly expressed in patients with PCa than benign prostatic tissue. First, to confirm the expression of Del-1 level in prostatic tissue, we performed the IHC stain in patients with BPH and PCa. IHC revealed that Del-1 level of PCa group was significantly higher than benign group. Furthermore, in IHC stain, expression of Del-1 increased as the pT stage increased. Based on this experimental evidence derived from prostate tissue level, we also presumed that serum Del-1 protein would be highly expressed in patients with PCa than benign or health control group. As the same result, serum Del-1 protein in patients with PCa was higher than benign or health control group and expression of serum Del-1 protein was significantly increased with higher pT stage.

To our best knowledge, present trial is the first study to demonstrate the diagnostic and risk stratification values of Del-1 protein on serum EV as a novel biomarker for PCa. Combination of measurement of serum Del-1 protein with serum PSA may enhance the identification of patients with PCa and may reduce unnecessary prostate needle biopsy.

However, present study has some limitation. There are no evidences of Del-1’s superiority over PSA, and Del-1 could be valuable only when collaboration with PSA. Decline of Del-1 expression not only after PR but also radiation therapy or medical treatment such as ADT or docetaxel based chemotherapy should be evaluated. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that patients of benign group is ‘real’ benign. Because there can be hidden cancer in patients of benign group whose first prostate biopsy is negative or whose biopsy results are ‘no tumor’ after TURP or HoLEP. Another problem is that detecting Del-1 protein takes a lot of time and cost in current technology. Too small in number of healthy patients also should be considered and therefore the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. The biggest practical difficulties when considering which biological marker for PCa to use is the absence of prospective head to head trials comparing the various biomarkers from numerous trials [6]. Furthermore, previous some trials have requested that even within a given test the cutoff value used in one population may not be the most appropriate cutoff value for another population [36, 37]. Therefore, in the future, further large-scale population-based multi-institutional prospective trials for PCa biomarkers including Del-1 protein should be performed.

Conclusions

There are imminent academic expectation of identifying novel biomarkers with the capability to more precisely diagnose PCa due to lack of cancer specificity of PSA. Present study is the first trial to demonstrate the diagnostic and risk stratification value of Del-1 protein on serum EV as a non-invasive novel marker for PCa. Patients with PCa showed higher expression of Del-1 protein than benign patients. Del-1 protein increased with the stage and Gleason score of PCa. Collaboration with PSA, Del-1 protein can be a useful marker for diagnosis and risk stratification of PCa.

Supporting information

S1 File

(ZIP)

Abbreviations

PCa

prostate cancer

PSA

prostate-specific antigen

Del-1

developmental endothelial locus-1

BPH

benign prostatic hyperplasia

TURP

transurethral resection of prostate

HoLEP

holmium laser enucleation of prostate

TRUS

transrectal ultrasound

RP

radical prostatectomy

ADT

androgen deprivation therapy

ELISA

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HR

hazard ratio

CI

confidence internal

EV

extracellular vesicle

IHC

immunohistochemistry

ROC

receiver operating characteristic

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital (2019).

References

  • 1.Presti JC Jr., O’Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003;169(1):125–9. Epub 2002/12/13. 10.1097/01.ju.0000036482.46710.7e . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Janbaziroudsari H, Mirzaei A, Maleki N. Association of serum prostate-specific antigen levels with the results of the prostate needle biopsy. B Cancer. 2016;103(9):730–4. 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.05.006 WOS:000386647100006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Albertsen PC. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: Where are we going? Cancer. 2018;124(3):453–5. 10.1002/cncr.31140 WOS:000423076000005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kearns JT, Lin DW. Improving the Specificity of PSA Screening with Serum and Urine Markers. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(10):80. Epub 2018/08/15. 10.1007/s11934-018-0828-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim JH, Hong SK. Clinical utility of current biomarkers for prostate cancer detection. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62(1):1–13. Epub 2021/01/01. 10.4111/icu.20200395 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Becerra MF, Atluri VS, Bhattu AS, Punnen S. Serum and urine biomarkers for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2020. Epub 2020/04/04. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moon PG, Lee JE, Cho YE, Lee SJ, Jung JH, Chae YS, et al. Identification of Developmental Endothelial Locus-1 on Circulating Extracellular Vesicles as a Novel Biomarker for Early Breast Cancer Detection. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(7):1757–66. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0654 WOS:000373360600023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Bismar TA, Montironi R. ’Insignificant’ prostate cancer on prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy: variation on a theme ’low-volume/low-grade’ prostate cancer? Bju International. 2010;106(3):304–15. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09499.x WOS:000279898400003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frankcombe DE, Li J, Cohen RJ. Redefining the Concept of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2020;136:176–9. Epub 2019/11/13. 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, Potter JD, Thompson ML, Thornquist M, et al. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(14):1054–61. Epub 2001/07/19. 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bismar TA, Demichelis F, Riva A, Kim R, Varambally S, He L, et al. Defining aggressive prostate cancer using a 12-gene model. Neoplasia. 2006;8(1):59–68. 10.1593/neo.05664 WOS:000239271400008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hidai C, Zupancic T, Penta K, Mikhail A, Kawana M, Quertermous EE, et al. Cloning and characterization of developmental endothelial locus-1: an embryonic endothelial cell protein that binds the alphavbeta3 integrin receptor. Genes Dev. 1998;12(1):21–33. Epub 1998/02/21. 10.1101/gad.12.1.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Choi EY, Chavakis E, Czabanka MA, Langer HF, Fraemohs L, Economopoulou M, et al. Del-1, an endogenous leukocyte-endothelial adhesion inhibitor, limits inflammatory cell recruitment. Science. 2008;322(5904):1101–4. Epub 2008/11/15. 10.1126/science.1165218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Choi EY, Lim JH, Neuwirth A, Economopoulou M, Chatzigeorgiou A, Chung KJ, et al. Developmental endothelial locus-1 is a homeostatic factor in the central nervous system limiting neuroinflammation and demyelination. Mol Psychiatr. 2015;20(7):880–8. 10.1038/mp.2014.146 WOS:000356611800011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klotzsche A, Cremer S, Khedr S, Korovina I, Chatzigeorgiou A, Dimmeler S, et al. Endogenous developmental endothelial locus-1 limits ischemia-related angiogenesis by blocking inflammation. Acta Physiol. 2017;219:153–. WOS:000395770300303. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fu Y, Tsauo J, Sun Y, Wang Z, Kim KY, Lee SH, et al. Developmental endothelial locus-1 prevents development of peritoneal adhesions in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;500(3):783–9. Epub 2018/04/24. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.158 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim WY, Lee SH, Kim DY, Ryu HJ, Chon GR, Park YY, et al. Serum developmental endothelial locus-1 is associated with severity of sepsis in animals and humans. Sci Rep-Uk. 2019;9. ARTN 13005 10.1038/s41598-019-49564-5 WOS:000484986300019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Aoka Y, Johnson FL, Penta K, Hirata Ki K, Hidai C, Schatzman R, et al. The embryonic angiogenic factor Del1 accelerates tumor growth by enhancing vascular formation. Microvasc Res. 2002;64(1):148–61. Epub 2002/06/21. 10.1006/mvre.2002.2414 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zou X, Qiao H, Jiang X, Dong X, Jiang H, Sun X. Downregulation of developmentally regulated endothelial cell locus-1 inhibits the growth of colon cancer. J Biomed Sci. 2009;16:33. Epub 2009/03/19. 10.1186/1423-0127-16-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Niu JX, Zhang WJ, Ye LY, Wu LQ, Zhu GJ, Yang ZH, et al. The role of adhesion molecules, alpha v beta 3, alpha v beta 5 and their ligands in the tumor cell and endothelial cell adhesion. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007;16(6):517–27. 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3280145c00 WOS:000250689500005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elinav E, Nowarski R, Thaiss CA, Hu B, Jin CC, Flavell RA. Inflammation-induced cancer: crosstalk between tumours, immune cells and microorganisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(11):759–71. 10.1038/nrc3611 WOS:000326275700007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun W, Watanabe Y, Wang ZQ. Expression and significance of ICAM-1 and its counter receptors LFA-1 and Mac-1 in experimental acute pancreatitis of rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(31):5005–9. Epub 2006/08/29. 10.3748/wjg.v12.i31.5005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Yamamoto Y, Ikeuchi H, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, et al. Predicting Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer Using Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis. Clin Colorectal Canc. 2011;10(2):134–41. 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.011 WOS:000291297000011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beckham CJ, Olsen J, Yin PN, Wu CH, Ting HJ, Hagen FK, et al. Bladder cancer exosomes contain EDIL-3/Del1 and facilitate cancer progression. J Urol. 2014;192(2):583–92. Epub 2014/02/18. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.035 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xia HP, Chen JX, Shi M, Gao HJ, Sekar K, Seshachalam VP, et al. EDIL3 is a novel regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition controlling early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2015;63(4):863–73. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.005 WOS:000361729900015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peinado H, Aleckovic M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B, Moreno-Bueno G, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18(6):883–+. 10.1038/nm.2753 WOS:000305116600025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Antonyak MA, Li B, Boroughs LK, Johnson JL, Druso JE, Bryant KL, et al. Cancer cell-derived microvesicles induce transformation by transferring tissue transglutaminase and fibronectin to recipient cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(12):4852–7. Epub 2011/03/04. 10.1073/pnas.1017667108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang HG, Grizzle WE. Exosomes and cancer: a newly described pathway of immune suppression. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(5):959–64. Epub 2011/01/13. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.D’Souza-Schorey C, Clancy JW. Tumor-derived microvesicles: shedding light on novel microenvironment modulators and prospective cancer biomarkers. Genes Dev. 2012;26(12):1287–99. Epub 2012/06/21. 10.1101/gad.192351.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moon PG, You S, Lee JE, Hwang D, Baek MC. Urinary exosomes and proteomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2011;30(6):1185–202. Epub 2011/05/06. 10.1002/mas.20319 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sun JC, Liang XT, Pan K, Wang H, Zhao JJ, Li JJ, et al. High expression level of EDIL3 in HCC predicts poor prognosis of HCC patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(36):4611–5. Epub 2010/09/22. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i36.4611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu TC, Mendes DE, Berkman CE. Functional prostate-specific membrane antigen is enriched in exosomes from prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(3):918–22. 10.3892/ijo.2014.2256 WOS:000336894900033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lopez-Otin C, Diamandis EP. Breast and prostate cancer: an analysis of common epidemiological, genetic, and biochemical features. Endocr Rev. 1998;19(4):365–96. Epub 1998/08/26. 10.1210/edrv.19.4.0337 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lopez-Abente G, Mispireta S, Pollan M. Breast and prostate cancer: an analysis of common epidemiological features in mortality trends in Spain. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:874. Epub 2014/11/26. 10.1186/1471-2407-14-874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Proverbs-Singh T, Feldman JL, Morris MJ, Autio KA, Traina TA. Targeting the androgen receptor in prostate and breast cancer: several new agents in development. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 2015;22(3):R87–R106. 10.1530/ERC-14-0543 WOS:000359003500005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.O’Malley PG, Nguyen DP, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wu G, Thompson IM, Sanda M, et al. Racial Variation in the Utility of Urinary Biomarkers PCA3 and T2ERG in a Large Multicenter Study. J Urol. 2017;198(1):42–9. Epub 2017/01/25. 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, et al. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):558–61. Epub 2018/11/07. 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

19 Feb 2021

PONE-D-21-02189

Identification of a novel non-invasive biological marker to overcome the shortcomings of PSA in diagnosis and risk stratification for prostate cancer: Initial prospective study of developmental endothelial locus-1 protein

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kwon,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 05 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3.Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) & funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2018R1C1B5040264) (2019R1A2C1004046) (2019R1F1A1044473) (2019R1H1A1079839)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 "The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4.PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

<h1> </h1>

Additional Editor Comments:

Overall a nice paper investigating the value of Del-1 protein concentration in prostate cancer.

1. Provide more information in the patient characteristics, e.g. DRE finding, any metastasis

2. Usually we classify prostate cancer into clinically significant vs insignificant cancers. Additional analysis especially multivariate analysis is needed for this outcome.

3. For the Del-1 protein cut-off value, how does its diagnostic performance compare with PSA?

4. Does Del-1 protein have any implications on the oncological outcomes?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is great work looking into early stages of developing a new biomarker in diagnosis of PCa.

I believe the manuscript can be written in a better way. Introduction and discussion is lengthy. I suggest in the introduction focus on limitation of PSA briefly and introduce the new biomarker. This should be one or two paragraph. The discussion also can be more to the point. Great work mentioning the limitation. In addition, indicate that this work is in what stage of biomarker development- there are know phases of developing biomarkers.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250254.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Feb 2021

[Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh, Academic Editor]

★ After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 05 2021 11:59PM.

★ If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

� I updated the statement of my financial disclosure in my cover letter.

★ Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

★ If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

� It is inappropriate to deposit my laboratory protocols and data because there are a lot of data related to personal informations.

We ask for your understanding.

[Journal Requirements]

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

� I’ve changed my manuscript according to PLOS ONE's style.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services. If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

� I send the files that have been corrected by a professional proofreader in English (Enago) as a ‘supporting information’ file.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

• The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

• A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

• A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) & funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2018R1C1B5040264) (2019R1A2C1004046) (2019R1F1A1044473) (2019R1H1A1079839)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

� I removed the funding-related text from the manuscript. Instead, we put the Funding Statement in my cover letter.

[This work was supported by Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital (2019).]

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

� I’ve updated my ORCID iD.

[Additional Editor Comments]

Overall a nice paper investigating the value of Del-1 protein concentration in prostate cancer.

1. Provide more information in the patient characteristics, e.g. DRE finding, any metastasis

� Thank you for valuable comment.

I’ve added additional information about the patients’ characteristics, including BMI, prostate volume, PSA density and presence of non-regional lymph node or distant metastasis.

However, a lot of data about DRE finding were missing.

We ask for your understanding.

2. Usually we classify prostate cancer into clinically significant vs insignificant cancers. Additional analysis especially multivariate analysis is needed for this outcome.

� Thank you for valuable comment.

1) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20653654/

2) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31715271/

We subdivided the patients who underwent radical prostatectomy into clinically insignificant PCa and significant PCa group according to RP specimen.

Clinically insignificant PCa group must meet all three criteria below and may be eligible for active surveilance; 1) PSA<10 ng/dL, 2) Gleason 6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4), 3) pT stage 2.

And then, we finally performed multivariate analysis among the patients with benign plus insignificant PCa versus the patients with significant PCa.

3. For the Del-1 protein cut-off value, how does its diagnostic performance compare with PSA?

� Thank you for valuable comment.

As we already described in Results (Table 2, 3) & Discussion section, cut-off value of Del-1 protein as 0.120 showed high specificity and positive predictive value. However, in this regard alone, we cannot guarantee that Del-1 protein is superior to PSA.

Only when collaboration with PSA, Del-1 protein can be useful in terms of reducing unnecessary PBx.

4. Does Del-1 protein have any implications on the oncological outcomes?

� Thank you for valuable comment.

We strongly believed that Del-1 protein is associated with BCR.

And we already found that Del-1 protein decreased after RP.

However, as the number of patients who were investigated for the relationship between BCR and Del-1 protein is too small, we may be able to provide the exact facts in the next paper.

We ask for your understanding.

[Reviewers' comments to the Author]

Reviewer #1: This is great work looking into early stages of developing a new biomarker in diagnosis of PCa.

I believe the manuscript can be written in a better way. Introduction and discussion is lengthy. I suggest in the introduction focus on limitation of PSA briefly and introduce the new biomarker. This should be one or two paragraph. The discussion also can be more to the point.

� Thank you for valuable comment.

I have made short and stylish changes to the introduction and conclusion section.

Great work mentioning the limitation. In addition, indicate that this work is in what stage of biomarker development-there are known phases of developing biomarkers.

� Thank you for valuable comment.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1584291/pdf/neo0801_0059.pdf

Present study is the first fundamental step for biomarker development which is the identification of high-quality samples to perform high-quantity analysis, including proteomics and expression array analysis. In this study, a large amount of PCa patients’ serum was used for discovery of new biomarker before meta-analysis.

I added this point to the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh

5 Apr 2021

Identification of a novel non-invasive biological marker to overcome the shortcomings of PSA in diagnosis and risk stratification for prostate cancer: Initial prospective study of developmental endothelial locus-1 protein

PONE-D-21-02189R1

Dear Dr. Kwon,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh

15 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-02189R1

Identification of a novel non-invasive biological marker to overcome the shortcomings of PSA in diagnosis and risk stratification for prostate cancer: Initial prospective study of developmental endothelial locus-1 protein

Dear Dr. Kwon:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES