Skip to main content
The Journal of Reproduction and Development logoLink to The Journal of Reproduction and Development
. 2021 Feb 6;67(2):123–133. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2020-150

Effects of exposure to methylglyoxal on sperm motility and embryonic development after fertilization in mice

Tatsuya NAKANO 1,2, Mizuki KONO 3, Kazuki SEGAWA 3, Satoshi KUROSAKA 4, Yoshiharu NAKAOKA 2, Yoshiharu MORIMOTO 5, Tasuku MITANI 1,3
PMCID: PMC8075723  PMID: 33551390

Abstract

Methylglyoxal (MG) is a precursor for the generation of endogenous advanced glycation end-products involved in various diseases, including infertility. The present study evaluated the motility and developmental competence after in vitro fertilization of mouse sperm which were exposed to MG in the capacitation medium for 1.5 h. Sperm motility was analyzed using an SQA-V automated sperm quality analyzer. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and DNA damage were assessed using flow cytometry. The matured oocytes were inseminated with MG-exposed sperm, and subsequently, the fertilization and embryonic development in vitro were evaluated in vitro. The exposure of sperm to MG did not considerably affect the swim-up of sperm but resulted in a deteriorated sperm motility in a concentration-dependent manner, which was associated with a decreased mitochondrial activity. However, these effects was not accompanied by obvious ROS accumulation or DNA damage. Furthermore, MG diminished the fertilization rate and developmental competence, even after normal fertilization. Collectively, a short-term exposure to MG during sperm capacitation had a critical impact on sperm motility and subsequent embryonic development after fertilization. Considering that sperm would remain in vivo for up to 3 days until fertilization, our findings suggest that sperm can be affected by MG in the female reproductive organs, which may be associated with infertility.

Keywords: Embryonic development, Methylglyoxal, Mitochondrial membrane potential, Reactive oxygen species, Sperm motility


In Japan, approximately 15% of couples of reproductive age are infertile, with nearly half of them are associated with abnormalities in the male partner [1, 2]. Most of the cases of male infertility are caused by abnormal spermatogenesis and failure in sperm function. Decrease in male fertility has been linked to environmental factors, smoking, alcohol abuse, chronic stress, obesity and inflammation in the male reproductive system [3,4,5,6], which causes testicular dysfunction and poor sperm quality. Reproductive disorders are strongly associated with the overproduction of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress. It has been reported that ROS generation occurs during the production of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), and AGEs are largely accumulated in the reproductive tract and semen of patients with diabetes [7, 8]. Furthermore, in some male patients experiencing infertility, there is some possibility that sperm function would be affected in the female genital tracts after an ejaculation.

AGEs are produced from carbonyl compounds such as glyoxal, methylglyoxal (MG), and 3-deoxyglucosone, as by-products during the glycation of proteins [9]. Carbonyl compounds are produced from the reducing sugars such as glucose as a by-product of the glycolytic pathway, and is strongly reactive with proteins [10, 11]. This glycation process generates ROS, which causes DNA damage and brings on the dysfunction of various proteins by cross-linking [12, 13]. In particular, MG reacts with a wide range of proteins and strongly promotes glycation when compared with glucose and other carbonyl compounds.

In patients with diabetes, it has been reported that the blood MG level is approximately 2 μM [7]. In an animal model, the blood MG level in hypertensive rats (SHR) was shown to increased with aging and was approximately 33.6 μM when compared with 14.2 μM in Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) [14]. Regarding the effect of glycation on the reproductive systems, there have been several reports on studies using cells derived from the female reproductive organs and preimplantation embryos. Hajagos-Toth et al. [15] have evaluated the effect of antioxidants during the last trimester of pregnancy on the proliferation of rat myometrium cells and the ion channels, which were treated with 30 mM MG for 30 min. Furthermore, Hsuuw et al. [16] have investigated the apoptosis of mouse blastocysts following treatment with 200 μM MG for 3 h, considering increased MG levels detected in patients with diabetes. On the other hand, the effect of glycation on testicular function has been investigated using murine Leydig cells and animal models of erectile dysfunction [17, 18]. In human, the ejaculated sperm from patients with diabetes demonstrate a decrease in motility and an increased AGE accumulation [19, 20]. Some reports indicate that these human sperm undergo increased DNA fragmentation, with deteriorated developmental potential to the blastocyst stage after in vitro fertilization [21, 22]. Nevin et al. have demonstrated that exposure of human sperm to 100 μM of MG induces cell membrane damage [23]. However, the influence of MG in sperm function has not been comprehensively investigated, and the fertilization and developmental potential of MG-exposed sperm remain unclear. In some male patients experiencing infertility, male germ cells including sperm are supposedly to be exposed to MG during various processes such as spermatogenesis in the testis, maturation and storage in the epididymis, and capacitation in the female genitalia. In the present study, the function of mouse sperm exposed to MG was investigated by evaluating several sperm parameters, oxidative stress, and DNA integrity. Furthermore, we examined the fertilization and embryonic development using MG-exposed sperm, which revealed that sperm with low MG-exposure levels could fertilize with oocytes normally but presented deteriorated developmental competence. Our findings suggest the hidden influence of the glycation-induced sperm damage on male infertility after fertilization.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All mice (ICR strain) were purchased from Kiwa Laboratory Animals (Wakayama, Japan) at 8 weeks of age and maintained in light-controlled and air-conditioned rooms. This research was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guidelines of Kindai University for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Kindai University (Permit Number: KABT-31-024).

Sperm preparation and sperm motility analysis

Sperm collection procedures were performed as previously described [24]. In brief, spermatozoa were collected from the cauda epididymis of male mice. The sperm suspension was incubated in a modified human tubal fluid (mHTF) medium [25] with or without various concentrations of MG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) (300 μM, 500 μM, 1 mM, and 5 mM) for 1.5 h at 37ºC under 5% CO2 in air. After incubation, the upper portion of the sperm suspension (the upper portion) was separated from the lower portion containing condensed sperm (the lower portion) after the incubation, and both portions of the sperm suspension after the incubation were manually evaluated for total sperm concentration and motile sperm rates using a Makler counting chamber (Seifi-Medical Instruments, Haifa, Israel) under a phase-contrast microscope (× 200). Furthermore, the upper portion and lower portion of the sperm suspension were analyzed using the SQA-V automated sperm quality analyzer (Medical Electronic Systems Ltd., Caesarea Industrial Park, Israel) [26]. The SQA-V simultaneously measured various parameters including motile sperm concentration (MSC), rapid progressive MSC (rapid PMSC), slow progressive MSC (slow PMSC), non-progressive MSC (non-PMSC), average velocity of motile sperm (velocity), and sperm motility index (SMI). SMI values are calculated based on the number of sperm and the type of motility.

Measurement of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and membrane integrity

ROS generation was assessed using CellROX® Green reagent (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). It is a fluorescent probe that penetrates the cell and emits a more intense green fluorescence when oxidized by intracellular free radicals. To evaluate sperm membrane integrity, we measured the fluorescence of propidium iodide (PI), which is incorporated into the nuclei of dead cells. After the incubation for 1.5 h, the upper portion of the sperm suspension was incubated in mHTF containing 5 μM CellROX® Green and 1 μg/ml PI for 30 min at 37ºC, washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and analyzed using flow cytometry (FACS Calibur with CellQuest software, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) [27] with fluorescence excited with 488 nm argon laser and detected with 530/30 nm BP (CellROX) and 670 nm LP (PI) emission filter, respectively. As a reference, sperm were incubated in mHTF containing 1 mM hydrogen peroxide. In total, 10,000 events were counted in each sample, and experiments were performed in triplicate.

Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP)

MMP was measured using a JC-10 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). This probe emits green or red-orange fluorescence for low or high mitochondrial potential, respectively. After the incubation for 1.5 h, the upper portion of the sperm suspension prepared as mentioned above, was incubated with mHTF containing 10 μg/ml JC-10 for 30 min at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. MMP was represented as the ratio of red/green fluorescence excited with 488 nm argon laser and detected with 670 nm (red) and 530/30 nm (green) BP emission filters, respectively. As a reference, sperm were incubated in mHTF containing 1 mM hydrogen peroxide. In total, 10,000 events were counted in each sample, and experiments were were performed in triplicate.

Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)

Sperm DNA damage was evaluated by SCSA using a metachromatic fluorescence probe, acridine orange (AO) [28]. The upper portion of the sperm suspension prepared as previously described, was incubated with TNE buffer (Tris-HCl 0.01 M, NaCl 0.15 M, EDTA 1 mM, and distilled water, pH 7.4), followed by the addition of an acid detergent solution (HCl 0.08 M, NaCl 0.15 M, and Triton X-100 0.1% in distilled water, pH 1.2). After 30 sec, the samples were stained with AO solution (citric acid 0.1 M, Na2HPO4 0.2 M, EDTA 0.001 M, NaCl 0.15 M, and AO 6 μg/ml in distilled water, pH 6.0) for 5 min at 37°C. Finally, samples were analyzed by flow cytometry with fluorescence excited with 488 nm argon laser and detected with 630–650 nm (red) emission filter, respectively. As a reference, sperm were incubated in mHTF containing 1 mM hydrogen peroxide. In total, 10,000 events were counted in each sample, and experiments were repeated at six times.

In vitro fertilization and culture

In vitro fertilization was performed according to a previously described method [24]. In brief, sperm were collected as previously described. Oocytes surrounded by cumulus cells (COCs) were collected from the excised oviducts of superovulated female mice. After 1.5 h of incubation, the upper portion of the sperm suspension was added to the mHTF-containing COCs. Six hours after insemination, morphologically normal fertilized oocytes were recovered and cultured in modified potassium simplex optimized medium (mKSOM) at 37°C under 5% CO2 in air. Embryos at the 2- cell, 4- cell, 8-cell, morula and blastocyst stages were observed at 24, 48, 72, 84, and 96 h post-insemination (hpi), respectively. The blastocysts were treated with acidified Tyrode’s solution (FUJIFILM Irvine Scientific, Saitama, Japan) to remove the zona pellucida and were rinsed in PBS containing 0.3% polyvinyl pyrrolidone (0.3% PVP/PBS). Thereafter, they were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) for 15 min, rinsed in 0.3% PVP/PBS, and permeabilized using PBS containing 0.2% TritonX-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) for 15 min. Finally, they were stained with 1.5 µg/ml 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with DAPI; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA). The total cell number of blastocysts was counted using a fluorescence microscope (AF6500; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a UV filter (Ex 360 nm).

Statistics

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Sperm motility was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Tukey’s multiple range test. Intracellular ROS and sperm membrane integrity, MMP and SCSA were compared using the Student’s t-test. In vitro fertilization and embryonic development were evaluated using the Chi-square test. Statistical analyses were performed using StatView version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sperm motility

Table 1 summarizes the results of sperm motility assessments. After incubation for 1.5 h with or without MG, the sperm motility was compared between the upper portion and lower portion. In the upper portion, the total sperm concentration of non-treated sperm was 80.0 million/ml, and that of sperm treated with MG did not significantly differ at 300 μM, 500 μM, and 1 mM (86.0, 75.0, and 69.0 million/ml, respectively) and exhibiting a significant difference at 5 mM (57.0 million/ml). In contrast, the total sperm concentration of the lower portion was ranged between 228.0 and 268.0 million/ml, demonstrating no significant difference. In the sperm suspension, the motile sperm rate of the non-treated upper portion of sperm suspension was 67.9%, and that of the upper portion treated with MG at 300 µM MG did not differ significantly (61.6%). On the other hand, the motile sperm rate of the upper portion treated with MG at 500 μM, 1 mM and 5 mM significantly declined (49.3%, 35.9%, and 2.7%, respectively). In particular, most of the sperm lost its motility after treatment with 5 mM MG. For the lower portion of the sperm suspension, the motile sperm rate did not differ between non-treated and MG-treated sperm at 300 µM and 500 µM (37.2%, 39.4%, and 33.6%, respectively), but decreased significantly after treatment with MG at 1 mM and 5 mM MG in a concentration-dependent manner (19.8% and 1.0%, respectively). The more detailed parameters such as progressive motility and velocity of sperm were measured using SQA-V. In the upper portion, the gross MSC was remarkably reduced following MG treatment when compared with the lower portion of the sperm suspension. MSCs of MG-treated sperm at 300 µM to 1 mM significantly decreased less than half (18.7, 18.7, and 10.8 million/ml, respectively) when compared with the non-treated sperm (42.5 million/ml). Based on parameters of MSC, it was observed that rapid PMSC of MG-treated sperm at 300 µM and 500 µM did not differ, decreasing significantly in MG-treated sperm at 1 mM and 5 mM. In contrast, slow PMSC and non-PMSC were more strongly affected by the MG treatment. Regarding PMSC, 5 mM of MG demonstrated a harmful effect on sperm motility. The velocity was 7.3 μm/sec in non-treated sperm and remained unaffected in MG-treated sperm at 300 µM and 500 µM (6.0 and 6.7 μm/sec, respectively). However, the velocity was significantly decreased at 1 mM and 5 mM (2.7 and 0.7 μm/sec, respectively). The SMI of MG-treated sperm, calculated using these parameters of SQA-V, significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent manner. For sperm treated with 300 µM and 500 µM MG, the SMI was 70% that of non-treated sperm; treatment with 1 mM MG drastically decreased SMI to one-third. For 5 mM MG-treated sperm, the SMI revealed an extremely low value. In the lower portion, the effect of MG on sperm motility was similar but tended to be smaller than that of sperm in the upper portion.

Table 1. Motility parameters of the sperm exposed to methylglyoxal.

Total sperm concentration
(106/ml)*
Motile sperm rate
(%) *
Motile sperm concentration
(106/ml)
Rapid progressive motile sperm conc
(106/ml)
Slow progressive motile sperm conc
(106/ml)
Non progressive motile sperm conc
(106/ml)
Velocity
(µm/sec)
Sperm motility index
(SMI)
Upper portion of the sperm suspension
0 µM 80.0 ± 11.2 a 67.9 ± 2.4 a 42.5 ± 7.1 a 4.7 ± 0.5 a 21.7 ± 6.5 a 16.1 ± 0.3 a 7.3 ± 1.2 a 140.0 ± 32.9 a
300 µM 86.0 ± 2.6 a 61.6 ± 1.3 a 18.7 ± 8.0 b 4.6 ± 0.3 a 5.7 ± 4.8 b 8.1 ± 3.1 b 6.0 ± 0.1 a 94.0 ± 8.6 b
500 µM 75.0 ± 4.1 a 49.3 ± 1.3 b 18.7 ± 6.0 b 4.7 ± 0.4 a 6.0 ± 4.2 b 8.0 ± 1.5 b 6.7 ± 0.6 a 93.3 ± 10.1 b
1 mM 69.0 ± 5.7 a 35.9 ± 1.5 b 10.8 ± 0.4 c 2.8 ± 0.3 b 0.4 ± 0.1 b 7.5 ± 0.3 b 2.7 ± 0.6 b 52.7 ± 3.1 c
5 mM 57.0 ± 2.5 b 2.7 ± 1.6 c 3.8 ± 3.8 c 0.2 ± 0.2 c 0.0 ± 0.0 b 3.6 ± 3.1 c 0.7 ± 0.6 c 2.3 ± 2.0 d
H2O2 64.0 ± 4.3 3.6 ± 1.8 0.5 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0

Lower portion containing condensed sperm
0 µM 253.0 ± 11.4 e 37.2 ± 0.7 e 67.3 ± 2.4 e 12.9 ± 1.6 e 35.1 ± 1.0 e 19.3 ± 0.3 e 9.0 ± 0.0 e 252.7 ± 12.1 e
300 µM 248.0 ± 7.3 e 39.4 ± 1.9 e 47.2 ± 17.4 e 5.4 ± 0.7 f 25.2 ± 13.4 e 16.6 ± 3.9 e 7.0 ± 1.0 e 157.0 ± 52.0 f
500 µM 268.0 ± 9.9 e 33.6 ± 0.6 e 54.4 ± 19.8 e 6.1 ± 1.0 f 30.6 ± 13.9 e 17.8 ± 4.9 e 7.7 ± 1.2 e 164.7 ± 66.6 f
1 mM 228.0 ± 7.8 e 19.8 ± 1.3 f 61.3 ± 30.1 e 4.6 ± 0.7 f 32.5 ± 25.2 e 24.2 ± 11.0 e 6.3 ± 1.5 f 183.0 ± 76.2 f
5 mM 228.0 ± 5.9 e 1.0 ± 0.5 g 9.1 ± 8.2 f 0.3 ± 0.4 g 0.2 ± 0.3 f 8.5 ± 7.6 f 0.7 ± 0.6 g 12.7 ± 11.0 g
H2O2 240.0 ± 6.7 0.1 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0

* Sperm were manually evaluated for total sperm concentration and motile sperm rates using a Makler counting chamber. Values for each parameter are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters indicate significant differences (a–d, e–g) (P < 0.05).

Intracellular ROS and membrane integrity

To investigate the membrane damage of the upper and lower portions of sperm, PI staining was performed. In the sperm suspension, the PI intensity of the lower portion was stronger than that of the upper portion of sperm in an MG concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 1: online only), indicating that the lower portion of sperm were more considerably damaged. The following experiments were performed using only the upper portion of sperm suspension. The accumulation of intracellular ROS and membrane damage in sperm were assessed using CellROX® Green and PI, respectively. As a result, MG exposure to sperm did not affect intracellular ROS accumulation regardless of its concentration, whereas exposure to 1 mM hydrogen peroxide to sperm induced intracellular ROS accumulation (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the fluorescence intensity of PI nevertheless increased moderately in 300 µM to 1 mM MG-treated sperm and more strongly in 5 mM MG-treated sperm when compared with non-treated one. In the sperm treated with 1 mM hydrogen peroxide, the PI intensity was higher than that observed in any group treated with MG. Although a moderate increase of PI intensity was observed in 300 µM to 1 mM MG-treated sperm, the MG treatment at those conditions did not affect the sperm motility, as shown in Table 1; hence, the moderate PI-positive sperm were not dead. However, the sperm treated with 5 mM MG showed a further increase in PI intensity, with loss in motility. The population of PI-negative/CellROX-positive sperm was increased in the higher MG concentration (1 mM, 5 mM) groups when compared with the lower MG concentration groups (300 µM, 500 µM), indicating that high MG concentration induce intracellular ROS accumulation in live sperm (Figs. 1B and C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and membrane integrity of methylglyoxal (MG) -exposed sperm analyzed by flow cytometry. Sperm were treated with MG at various concentrations for 1.5 h. Intracellular ROS levels were detected using CellROX Green reagent, and the membrane integrity was analyzed by propidium iodide (PI) staining. (A) Exposure of sperm to MG dose not induce intracellular ROS accumulation regardless of its concentrations, whereas 1 mM hydrogen peroxide treatment obviously induces intracellular ROS accumulation. On the contrary, the PI intensity increase moderately in a concentration-dependent manner. The PI intensity in 1 mM hydrogen peroxide treated sperm is higher than that observed in any MG-treated groups. (B, C) Flow cytometry plots using CellROX Green/PI staining (B) and the percentage of PI (–)/CellROX (+) fraction of MG-treated sperm to that of non-treated sperm (control) (C). Intracellular ROS accumulation in sperm treated with lower MG concentrations (300 µM, 500 µM) is equivalent to the control, but it gradually increases when exposed to higher concentrations (1 mM, 5 mM). Sperm exposed to 1 mM hydrogen peroxide could not be measured owing to the absent of PI (–) fraction. * Asterisks indicate significant differences from the control (P < 0.05).

Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP)

As mitochondrial integrity is highly related to sperm viability, we examined whether MG induces mitochondrial dysfunction by evaluating MMP using JC-10 (Figs. 2A and B). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the ratio of sperm with high MMP (red/green) declined considerably in MG-treated sperm in a concentration-dependent manner. However, sperm treated with 5 mM MG demonstrated a moderate decline in MMP when compared with sperm treated with lower MG owing to the bimodal fluorescence distribution in the right half region.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) assay of the methylglyoxal (MG) -exposed sperm using JC-10 and flow cytometry. (A) The right half region in each dot plot diagram includes sperm with high MMP (HMMP), and the left half region indicates sperm with low MMP (LMMP). The population of sperm with LMMP increases following treatment with MG- or hydrogen peroxide-treatment. (B) The MMP (HMMP/LMMP) percentage of MG-treated sperm to that of non-treated sperm (control). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). * Asterisks indicate significant differences from the control (P < 0.05).

Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)

Sperm DNA damage following MG exposure was evaluated using SCSA (Fig. 3A). The DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was lower in the 300 µM to 1 mM MG-treated and 1 mM hydrogen peroxide-treated sperm than in non-treated sperm; however, no significant difference was observed. In the case of sperm treated with 5 mM MG, the DFI was the same as that in non-treated sperm (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

DNA fragmentation analysis of the methylglyoxal (MG)-exposed sperm by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). (A) Dot plot cytograms using green fluorescence (intact DNA) and red fluorescence (fragmented single-stranded DNA) channels indicate sperm DNA fragmentation. The sperm with fragmented DNA are depicted in the thick-frame presented as DNA fragmentation index (DFI). The DFI are indicated as the mean ± percentage standard deviation (SD%). (B) The percentage of the DFI of MG-treated sperm to that of non-treated sperm (control). There is no difference between MG-treated and non-treated sperm.

In vitro fertilization and embryonic development

To examine the effect of MG-exposed sperm on fertilization and embryonic development, we performed in vitro fertilization. Table 2 summarizes the results of in vitro fertilization experiments. Six hours after insemination, the majority of the oocytes inseminated with non-treated sperm contained 2 pronuclei (2PN; 91.9%). However, the exposure to sperm at 300 µM, 500 µM, and 1 mM MG during incubation significantly decreased normal fertilization (2PN) in a concentration-dependent manner (78.3%, 64.3%, and 44.9%, respectively), owing to the prevention of sperm penetration or unidentifiable pronuclei (0PN). Table 3 summarizes the results of the embryonic development of fertilized oocytes. Overall, more than 80% of oocytes fertilized with non-treated and 300 µM MG-treated sperm developed into blastocysts (86.5% and 80.9%, respectively). On the other hand, the developmental ability of oocytes fertilized with sperm treated at 500 µM and 1 mM MG, to the blastocyst stage, significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent manner (51.4% and 35.0%, respectively). There was no morphological difference between the blastocysts using MG-treated and the non-treated sperm (Fig. 4A). The total number of cells was 46.2 ± 11.3 (n = 19), 44.6 ± 13.9 (n = 12), 42.6 ± 7.2 (n = 10) and 42.1 ± 13.9 (n = 8) for the blastocysts generated using sperm exposed to 0 µM, 300 µM, 500 µM, and 1 mM MG, respectively (Fig. 4B), with there was no significant difference observed among them.

Table 2. In vitro fertilization of oocytes inseminated with sperm exposed to methylglyoxal.

MG Number of oocytes used Number (%) of oocytes with
2PN * 1PN 3PN 0PN
0 μM 124 114 (91.9) a 2 (1.6) 1 (0.8) 7 (5.6)
300 μM 60 47 (78.3) b 5 (8.3) 0 (0.0) 8 (13.3)
500 μM 112 72 (64.3) c 0 (0.0) 1 (0.9) 39 (34.8)
1 mM 89 40 (44.9) d 3 (3.4) 0 (0.0) 46 (51.7)

* Only oocytes with two pronuclei were used for subsequent in vitro culture experiments. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). MG, methylglyoxal; 2PN, 2 pronuclei; 1PN, one pronucleus; 3PN, three pronuclei; 0PN, absence of pronuclei.

Table 3. Embryonic development of oocytes fertilized with sperm exposed to methylglyoxal.

MG Number of fertilized oocytes used * Number (%) of fertilized oocytes developed to
2-cell 4-cell 8-cell Morula Blastocyst
0 μM 111 111 (100.0) 106 (95.5) 104 (93.7) 102 (91.9) 96 (86.5) a
300 μM 47 46 (97.9) 46 (97.9) 46 (97.9) 45 (95.7) 38 (80.9) a
500 μM 72 65 (90.3) 61 (84.7) 53 (73.6) 46 (63.9) 37 (51.4) b
1 mM 40 36 (90.0) 30 (75.0) 25 (62.5) 23 (57.5) 14 (35.0) c

* Only oocytes with two pronuclei were used for in vitro culture. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The morphology and total cell number of blastocysts using sperm exposed to methylglyoxal (MG). (A) In vitro development of the fertilized eggs using sperm exposed to MG. In MG-treated groups, the degenerated eggs increased in a concentration-dependent manner. However, no morphological difference can be observed among the blastocysts using MG-treated groups and control. Magnification: 150 ×. (B) The total cell number of blastocysts using MG-treated and non-treated sperm (control). The x signs near the median lines of each graph represent the mean value. There is no difference between MG-treated groups and control.

Discussion

In in vitro studies, cytotoxicity of MG has been investigated using cultured cells by exposure to MG concentrations ranging between 300 μM and 1 mM, for 1–3 h [29, 30]. For example, in a study investigating smooth muscle contraction in hypertensive model rats, mesenteric artery cells were treated with 420 μM MG for 30 min [29]; and to assess long-term exposure, was performed for 3 days with 42 μM, which corresponds to the blood MG level in hypertensive rats [30]. Human sperm can survive for longer than 2 days in the female genital tracts to wait for fertilization to occur [31]; however, it is difficult to retain mouse sperm for 3 days in an in vitro environment, and hence, it is crucial to estimate the effects of MG under the examined conditions. Our results revealed that MG affected sperm function in a concentration-dependent manner, which resulted in a decrease in sperm motility (Table 1). Sperm motility was associated with the decreased mitochondrial activity (Fig. 1); however, it was not accompanied by obvious ROS accumulation or DNA damage (Figs. 2 and 3). In addition, MG deteriorated not only the fertilization rate but also the developmental competence of oocytes that were normally fertilized (with 2PN) (Tables 2 and 3).

Regarding the sperm preparation, the sperm concentration in the upper portion tended to gradually decrease in a concentration-dependent manner, and a significant difference was observed in the 5 mM MG-treated sperm; this indicated that MG did not considerably affect the swim-up of sperm itself. On the contrary, in the lower portion, it was presumed that the sperm concentration did not increase over a certain level, probably owing to spontaneous sedimentation. In contrast, in mouse sperm, MG exposure significantly deteriorated the motile sperm rate and parameters of MSC. Particularly, the major subpopulation of slow PMSC was remarkably reduced, resulting in decreased sperm motility index (SMI). Previous reports have shown that MG impairs cell viability in human retinal pigment epithelial cells and bovine retinal pericytes [32, 33] and reduces the viability of human sperm [23]. Therefore, to investigate the cause of decreased sperm motility following MG exposure, we examined the integrity of the sperm membrane. Following PI staining, we observed that the PI intensity of sperm in the lower portion was stronger than that of the upper portion of sperm suspension in an MG concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 1), suggesting that the lower portion of sperm suspension was damaged more severely. In the upper portion of the sperm suspension exposed to 1 mM hydrogen peroxide, the PI intensity was remarkably increased, and CellROX assay showed an accumulation of ROS in those sperm. On the other hand, MG treatment resulted in only a marginal increase in PI intensity, implying that the cell membrane was moderately damaged (Fig. 1A). According to the motile sperm rate in Table 1, sperm was mostly unaffected by such MG concentrations, except for 5 mM MG. The PI intensity in 5 mM MG-exposed sperm was only marginally stronger than that in the lower MG-exposed groups; however, it remains unclear whether such a slight change of the PI intensity could be a direct cause of decreased motility. In contrast, CellROX assay showed no ROS accumulation even in 5 mM MG-exposed sperm, suggesting that ROS was not a direct factor contributing to decreased sperm motility. Interestingly, in a subpopulation with the PI-negative sperm, no ROS accumulation was observed in 300 µM and 500 µM MG-exposed groups, whereas ROS was significantly accumulated in 1 mM and 5 mM MG-exposed groups (Figs. 1B and C). Sperm exposed to 1 mM hydrogen peroxide could not be measured because of the absent of the PI (–) fraction. These results indicate that even in the motile sperm, the accumulation of ROS increased in a concentration-dependent manner with concentrations exceeding 1 mM, which may affect the fertility and developmental ability of the embryos using these sperm.

Flagellar movement of sperm is one of the major determinants of male fertility and is regulated by the ATP supply generated by glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). These metabolic pathways are adjusted depending on the maternal reproductive environment, and the oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria is essential for sperm linear motility [34] and is governed by the MMP [35]. Our results demonstrated that MG did not significantly affect the sperm cell membrane damage and sperm viability but decreased MMP in a concentration-dependent manner, resulting in the deterioration of mitochondrial activity (Fig. 2B). Therefore, it was considered that reduced MMP affected the motile sperm rate and rapid PMSC. Furthermore, the ATP production and mitochondrial DNA transcription in sperm are impaired by an increased ROS [36], but decreased MMP without ROS accumulation in sperm treated with lower MG concentrations may indicate that certain factors other than oxidative stress affect MMP. It remains unclear why most sperm exposed to 5 mM MG are suddenly immobilized despite the marginal decrease in MMP.

MG elicits various harmful effects such as ROS production, DNA damage, and protein dysfunction owing to cross-linking [10, 11] during glycation reactions. For example, in bovine aortic endothelial cells, certain millimolar concentrations of MG can induce oxidative stress, causing apoptosis [37, 38]. However, neither accumulation of ROS (Fig. 1A) nor DNA fragmentation (Figs. 3A and B) in sperm was observed despite treatment with 5 mM MG. As mouse sperm is rather homogenous, robust, and stable when compared with human [39], the MG conditions applied here did not possibly induce DNA damage.

To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, we observed that MG-treated sperm affected embryonic development after fertilization. The fertilization rate gradually declined depending on the MG concentration (Table 2), probably owing to the diminished sperm motility (Table 1). Interestingly, even in the normally fertilized oocytes with 2PN, their developmental potential was impaired in a concentration-dependent manner (Table 3). On employing 300 µM MG-exposed sperm used, despite the normal fertilization rate of the oocytes being significantly reduced, the fertilized oocytes retained their developmental potential when compared with the control one. On the other hand, when oocytes were fertilized using sperm exposed to 500 µM or higher MG concentrations, their embryonic development was considerably reduced. These results suggest that sperm exposed to 300 µM of MG presented decreased its motility owing to a mitochondrial hypofunction, but still retained the post-fertilization developmental potential. Notably, although sperm exposed to a higher concentration of MG could produce seemingly normal eggs, they might have resulted in the impairment of the subsequent embryonic development, probably due to a certain level of ROS accumulation or other protein dysfunction in respective sperm. To date, it has been reported that oxidative stress in sperm affects epigenetic reprogramming and may affect embryogenesis [40, 41]. Alternatively, MG is highly reactive with lysine and arginine residues and is involved in epigenetic regulation as a histone mark [42]. Sperm chromatin is consists of arginine-rich protamine [43] and a small number of histones [44], and hence, MG could affect the post-fertilization epigenomic function. Herein, we compared the developmental potential of fertilized eggs produced by in vitro fertilization, but from a clinical standpoint; the developmental ability of the eggs fertilized with MG-exposed immotile sperm by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) will provide useful information. Furthermore, as no difference was observed in the morphology and the total cell number of the blastocysts regardless of the MG treatment, it is necessary to evaluate detailed characteristics of the developed embryos and clarify the post-implantation development by transferring blastocysts into the uterus.

In this study, we hypothesized that short-term exposure of mature sperm to MG mimics the environmental effects of sperm in the maternal uterus and oviducts on sperm. In bovine female reproductive tissues, the MG concentration in the follicular fluid is 30 μM, correlating with the serum content [45]; in hypertensive rats (SHR), the blood MG level is approximately 33.6 μM [14]. In terms of clinical characteristics, patients with diabetic and/or polycystic ovarian syndrome show higher blood MG levels (approximately 2 μM) than healthy individuals and, are therefore considered more susceptible to glycation reactions in vivo [7, 46]. Consequently, in patients with diabetes, high AGE levels in the uterine cavity impair the endometrial function and result in embryonic implantation incompetence [47]. Therefore, when the MG concentration is high in the female genital tracts, sperm can be affected either its motility or fertility while sperm are retained until fertilization. Our study demonstrated that sperm motility and their physiological phenomena were affected following exposure to MG in a concentration-dependent manner in the range of 300 µM-5 mM. Accordingly, the effects of chronic MG exposure on spermatogenesis need to be investigated using an in vitro induction system of spermatogenesis by employing spermatogonial stem cells [48, 49], elucidating the pathological influence of MG on male infertility.

In summary, we demonstrated that short-term exposure of sperm to MG affected sperm motility and subsequent embryonic development. Our findings suggest that the motility, fertilization ability and embryonic developmental competence of sperm can be affected by MG in the female reproductive organs even for short periods of up to 3 days. Therefore, MG and AGEs, as biomarkers of the maternal environment, may be potential therapeutic targets for improving fertility in sterile couples experiencing infertility.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary

Supplement Figure
jrd-67-123-s001.pdf (297.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Manami Shoka, Ikumi Takeda and Ayaka Watanabe for their technical assistances.

References

  • 1.Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Halabi J, Peng J, Vazquez-Levin M. Proteomics, oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 29: 32–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walczak-Jedrzejowska R, Wolski JK, Slowikowska-Hilczer J. The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male fertility. Cent European J Urol 2013; 66: 60–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cerami C, Founds H, Nicholl I, Mitsuhashi T, Giordano D, Vanpatten S, Lee A, Al-Abed Y, Vlassara H, Bucala R, Cerami A. Tobacco smoke is a source of toxic reactive glycation products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 13915–13920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sartorius GA, Nieschlag E. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 65–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eisenberg ML, Kim S, Chen Z, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Louis GM. The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: data from the LIFE study. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 493–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sharma R, Harlev A, Agarwal A, Esteves SC. Cigarette smoking and semen quality: a new meta-analysis examining the effect of the 2010 World Health Organization laboratory methods for the examination of human semen. Eur Urol 2016; 70: 635–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McLellan AC, Thornalley PJ, Benn J, Sonksen PH. Glyoxalase system in clinical diabetes mellitus and correlation with diabetic complications. Clin Sci (Lond) 1994; 87: 21–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ogawa S, Nakayama K, Nakayama M, Mori T, Matsushima M, Okamura M, Senda M, Nako K, Miyata T, Ito S. Methylglyoxal is a predictor in type 2 diabetic patients of intima-media thickening and elevation of blood pressure. Hypertension 2010; 56: 471–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thornalley PJ, Langborg A, Minhas HS. Formation of glyoxal, methylglyoxal and 3-deoxyglucosone in the glycation of proteins by glucose. Biochem J 1999; 344: 109–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Yan SF, Stern DM. The biology of the receptor for advanced glycation end products and its ligands. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1498: 99–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thornalley PJ, Battah S, Ahmed N, Karachalias N, Agalou S, Babaei-Jadidi R, Dawnay A. Quantitative screening of advanced glycation endproducts in cellular and extracellular proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Biochem J 2003; 375: 581–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Amicarelli F, Colafarina S, Cattani F, Cimini A, Di Ilio C, Ceru MP, Miranda M. Scavenging system efficiency is crucial for cell resistance to ROS-mediated methylglyoxal injury. Free Radic Biol Med 2003; 35: 856–871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rabbani N, Thornalley PJ. Dicarbonyls linked to damage in the powerhouse: glycation of mitochondrial proteins and oxidative stress. Biochem Soc Trans 2008; 36: 1045–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang X, Desai K, Clausen JT, Wu L. Increased methylglyoxal and advanced glycation end products in kidney from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 2315–2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hajagos-Tóth J, Hódi Á, Seres AB, Gáspár R. Effects of d- and l-limonene on the pregnant rat myometrium in vitro. Croat Med J 2015; 56: 431–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hsuuw YD, Chang CK, Chan WH, Yu JS. Curcumin prevents methylglyoxal-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in mouse embryonic stem cells and blastocysts. J Cell Physiol 2005; 205: 379–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen Y, Zhang Y, Ji H, Ji Y, Yang J, Huang J, Sun D. Involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in the oxidative stress induced by advanced glycation end products in murine Leydig cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2016; 32: 146–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Usta MF, Kendirci M, Gur S, Foxwell NA, Bivalacqua TJ, Cellek S, Hellstrom WJ. The breakdown of preformed advanced glycation end products reverses erectile dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: preventive versus curative treatment. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 242–250, discussion :250–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Karimi J, Goodarzi MT, Tavilani H, Khodadadi I, Amiri I. Relationship between advanced glycation end products and increased lipid peroxidation in semen of diabetic men. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 91: 61–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Amiri I, Karimi J, Piri H, Goodarzi MT, Tavilani H, Khodadadi I, Ghorbani M. Association between nitric oxide and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine levels in semen of diabetic men. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011; 57: 292–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rama Raju GA, Jaya Prakash G, Murali Krishna K, Madan K, Siva Narayana T, Ravi Krishna CH. Noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: effects on sperm morphological and functional characteristics, nuclear DNA integrity and outcome of assisted reproductive technique. Andrologia 2012; 44(Suppl 1): 490–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khavarimehr M, Nejati V, Razi M, Najafi G. Ameliorative effect of omega-3 on spermatogenesis, testicular antioxidant status and preimplantation embryo development in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49: 1545–1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nevin C, McNeil L, Ahmed N, Murgatroyd C, Brison D, Carroll M. Investigating the glycating effects of glucose, glyoxal and methylglyoxal on human sperm. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 9002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Toyoda Y, Yokoyama M, Hosi T. Studies on the fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. I. In vitro fertilization of eggs by fresh epididymal sperm. Jpn J Animal Reprod 1971; 16: 152–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Quinn P, Kerin JF, Warnes GM. Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 493–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hirano Y, Shibahara H, Shimada K, Yamanaka S, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Motoyama M, Suzuki M. Accuracy of sperm velocity assessment using the Sperm Quality Analyzer V. Reprod Med Biol 2004; 2: 151–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Matsumoto M, Iwamasa K, Rennert PD, Yamada T, Suzuki R, Matsushima A, Okabe M, Fujita S, Yokoyama M. Involvement of distinct cellular compartments in the abnormal lymphoid organogenesis in lymphotoxin-α-deficient mice and alymphoplasia (aly) mice defined by the chimeric analysis. J Immunol 1999; 163: 1584–1591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, de Angelis P, Claussen OP. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1039–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mukohda M, Yamawaki H, Nomura H, Okada M, Hara Y. Methylglyoxal inhibits smooth muscle contraction in isolated blood vessels. J Pharmacol Sci 2009; 109: 305–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mukohda M, Morita T, Okada M, Hara Y, Yamawaki H. Long-term methylglyoxal treatment causes endothelial dysfunction of rat isolated mesenteric artery. J Vet Med Sci 2013; 75: 151–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hanson FW, Overstreet JW. The interaction of human spermatozoa with cervical mucus in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 173–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chan CM, Huang DY, Huang YP, Hsu SH, Kang LY, Shen CM, Lin WW. Methylglyoxal induces cell death through endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction. J Cell Mol Med 2016; 20: 1749–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim J, Son JW, Lee JA, Oh YS, Shinn SH. Methylglyoxal induces apoptosis mediated by reactive oxygen species in bovine retinal pericytes. J Korean Med Sci 2004; 19: 95–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mukai C, Okuno M. Glycolysis plays a major role for adenosine triphosphate supplementation in mouse sperm flagellar movement. Biol Reprod 2004; 71: 540–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Agnihotri SK, Agrawal AK, Hakim BA, Vishwakarma AL, Narender T, Sachan R, Sachdev M. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) regulates sperm motility. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2016; 52: 953–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhu Z, Kawai T, Umehara T, Hoque SAM, Zeng W, Shimada M. Negative effects of ROS generated during linear sperm motility on gene expression and ATP generation in boar sperm mitochondria. Free Radic Biol Med 2019; 141: 159–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Takahashi K, Tatsunami R, Tampo Y. Methylglyoxal-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells. Yakugaku Zasshi 2008; 128: 1443–1448 (in Japanese). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tatsunami R, Takahashi K, Oba T, Tampo Y. Methylglyoxal-induced superoxide anion production in endothelial cells. Yakugaku Zasshi 2009; 129: 147–153 (in Japanese). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Villani P, Eleuteri P, Grollino MG, Rescia M, Altavista P, Spanò M, Pacchierotti F, Cordelli E. Sperm DNA fragmentation induced by DNAse I and hydrogen peroxide: an in vitro comparative study among different mammalian species. Reproduction 2010; 140: 445–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.de Castro LS, de Assis PM, Siqueira AF, Hamilton TR, Mendes CM, Losano JD, Nichi M, Visintin JA, Assumpção ME. Sperm oxidative stress is detrimental to embryo development: A dose-dependent study model and a new and more sensitive oxidative status evaluation. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016; 2016: 8213071. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wyck S, Herrera C, Requena CE, Bittner L, Hajkova P, Bollwein H, Santoro R. Oxidative stress in sperm affects the epigenetic reprogramming in early embryonic development. Epigenetics Chromatin 2018; 11: 60. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Galligan JJ, Wepy JA, Streeter MD, Kingsley PJ, Mitchener MM, Wauchope OR, Beavers WN, Rose KL, Wang T, Spiegel DA, Marnett LJ. Methylglyoxal-derived posttranslational arginine modifications are abundant histone marks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115: 9228–9233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Balhorn R. The protamine family of sperm nuclear proteins. Genome Biol 2007; 8: 227. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yamaguchi K, Hada M, Fukuda Y, Inoue E, Makino Y, Katou Y, Shirahige K, Okada Y. Re-evaluating the localization of sperm-retained histones revealed the modification-dependent accumulation in specific genome regions. Cell Reports 2018; 23: 3920–3932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Iwata H. Age-associated changes in granulosa cells and follicular fluid in cows. J Reprod Dev 2017; 63: 339–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Beisswenger PJ, Howell SK, Touchette AD, Lal S, Szwergold BS. Metformin reduces systemic methylglyoxal levels in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 1999; 48: 198–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Antoniotti GS, Coughlan M, Salamonsen LA, Evans J. Obesity associated advanced glycation end products within the human uterine cavity adversely impact endometrial function and embryo implantation competence. Hum Reprod 2018; 33: 654–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sato T, Katagiri K, Yokonishi T, Kubota Y, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Matoba S, Ogura A, Ogawa T. In vitro production of fertile sperm from murine spermatogonial stem cell lines. Nat Commun 2011; 2: 472. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sato T, Katagiri K, Gohbara A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Ogura A, Kubota Y, Ogawa T. In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature 2011; 471: 504–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement Figure
jrd-67-123-s001.pdf (297.7KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Reproduction and Development are provided here courtesy of The Society for Reproduction and Development

RESOURCES