Skip to main content
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review logoLink to Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
. 2021 Apr;10(1):17–25. doi: 10.15420/aer.2020.43

Arrhythmias and Conduction Disturbances in Autoimmune Rheumatic Disorders

Sotiris C Plastiras 1,, Haralampos M Moutsopoulos 2
PMCID: PMC8076972  PMID: 33936739

Abstract

Rhythm and conduction disturbances and sudden cardiac death are important manifestations of cardiac involvement in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD), which have a serious impact on morbidity and mortality. While the underlying arrhythmogenic mechanisms are multifactorial, myocardial fibrosis plays a pivotal role. It accounts for a substantial portion of cardiac mortality and may manifest as atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, conduction system abnormalities, biventricular cardiac failure or sudden death. In patients with ARD, myocardial fibrosis is considered to be the hallmark of cardiac involvement as a result of inflammatory process or to coronary artery occlusive disease. Myocardial fibrosis constitutes the pathological substrates for reentrant circuits. The presence of supraventricular extra systoles, tachyarrhythmias, ventricular activity and conduction disturbances are not uncommon in patients with ARDs, more often in systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory muscle disorders and anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis. In this review, the type, the relative prevalence and the underlying mechanisms of rhythm and conduction disturbances in the emerging field of cardiorheumatology are provided.

Keywords: Autoimmune systemic disorders, heart involvement, arrhythmias, conduction disturbances


Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) encompass a heterogeneous group of diseases affecting not only the musculoskeletal system but also multiple organs or systems.[1] Among them, the heart and the cardiovascular system may be affected through different pathophysiological mechanisms including myocardial inflammation and/or fibrosis, vasculitis, thromboembolic events or premature atherosclerosis. All these mechanisms can lead to an increased incidence of altered automaticity and reentry phenomena in patients with ARD.[25]

Conduction disorders occur mainly during flares of ARD and are in general more frequent than rhythm disturbances.[6] Rhythm disorders in patients with ARD have different, and not fully understood, underlying pathophysiological mechanisms with myocardial inflammation and fibrosis being the most important ones. Inflammatory processes and oxidative stress lead to cardiomyocyte necrosis with subsequent electrical and structural remodelling. Chronic inflammation leads to autonomic dysfunction, namely sympathetic overactivation and decreased parasympathetic function. Autoantibody-mediated and drug-induced arrhythmias are also frequently observed among patients with ARD.[7]

Although all heart structures can be affected in patients with systemic ARD, in this review we will focus on rhythm and conduction disturbances occurring in patients with systemic ARD, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and small-size vessel vasculitis and in particular the anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV). The relative prevalence of the different types of arrhythmias in patients with ARD (Table 1) has emerged from a limited number of small clinical studies.[8]

Table 1: Relative Frequency of Conduction Disturbances and Arrhythmias in Autoimmune Systemic Diseases.

Autoimmune Systemic Disease Typical Arrhythmias (Relative Frequency)
Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Sinus tachycardia (15–50%)

  • Premature atrial contractions (63.4%)

  • AF (2.8%)

  • Ventricular ectopy (45.8%)

  • QT prolongation (15.3%)

  • Increased QT dispersion (38.1%)

  • Conduction disturbances (34–70%)

Rheumatoid arthritis
  • AF (0.8–18.3%)

  • Ventricular arrhythmias (unknown prevalence)

  • Atrioventricular block (rare, unknown prevalence)

  • Congenital heart block (0.1%)

Systemic sclerosis
  • AF, atrial flutter and supraventricular paroxysmal tachycardia (20–30%)

  • Ventricular arrhythmias (67%)

  • Sudden cardiac death (21%)

  • First-degree heart block (6–10%)

  • Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block (<2%)

  • Left anterior fascicular block (7–16%)

  • Right bundle branch block (3–6%)

  • Left bundle branch block (3–6%)

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies
  • Premature atrial contractions, atrial tachycardia, AF (reported with unknown prevalence)

  • Ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death (reported with unknown prevalence)

  • Left anterior hemiblock (13%)

  • Right bundle branch block (9.1%),

  • Left bundle branch block (3.1%)

  • Fascicular block (1%)

  • First-, second-, or third-degree atrioventricular block and sick sinus syndrome (reported with unknown prevalence)

ANCA-associated vasculitis
  • ECG abnormalities (66%)

  • AF, extrasystoles, ventricular arrhythmias (unknown prevalence)

  • Heart block (3%)

Data source: Gawałko et al. 2020.[8]

Supraventricular Arrhythmias and Tachyarrhythmias in ARD

Supraventricular arrhythmias (SA) are commonly observed in patients with ARD.[9] The reported frequency of SA is variable, depending on diagnostic methods and patient selection.[10]

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

SLE is a prototype autoimmune disease characterised by a plethora of autoantibodies directed against circulating, cytoplasmic or nuclear autoantigens and a wide spectrum of clinical, laboratory and histopathological manifestations from the affected organs including the joints, skin, kidneys, lungs, nervous system and the heart.[11] In some patients, the disease runs an indolent course, while in others it can threaten the function of the affected organs and even the patient’s life.[11]

The underlying mechanisms of SA in SLE have not been extensively investigated and are probably numerous. Sinus tachycardia, AF and atrial ectopic beats are the most frequent arrhythmias seen in patients with SLE.[914] SA are often transient and may be related to lupus myocarditis and exacerbations of SLE with fever, volume depletion and congestive failure.

In a study by Texeira et al. that included 317 patients with SLE, Holter monitoring abnormalities were observed in about 85% of patients with SLE, including supraventricular ectopy (63.4%), bradycardia (31.7%), atrial tachycardia (15.5%) and AF (2.8%).[15]

In other studies, sinus tachycardia was found to occur in 50% of patients with SLE and was the only cardiac manifestation of SLE, which resolves with corticosteroid treatment.[14] Vasculitis-induced myocardial fibrosis or accelerated coronary atherosclerosis have been proposed as underlying mechanisms of SA in SLE through ectopic automatism, triggered activity or reentry.[1417]

Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disorder of unknown and complex pathogenesis, its main feature being the excessive production and accumulation of collagen leading to fibrosis of the affected organs.[11] Scleroderma can be divided into two forms – localised scleroderma or systemic sclerosis – based on clinical and serological criteria. These two forms can further be classified as either limited cutaneous SSc or diffuse cutaneous SSc.

Localised scleroderma is a disease of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and it is not associated with internal organ involvement or with increased mortality. However, SSc is associated with specific autoantibody positivity, systemic manifestations, internal organ involvement and increased mortality. The organs most frequently affected by scleroderma are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, kidneys, skeletal muscle and heart.[11]

SA are frequently seen in patients with SSc as a result of focal myocardial fibrosis (Figures 1 and 2).[1824] AF, atrial flutter and supraventricular paroxysmal tachycardia have been reported in 20–30% of patients.[2,23] Patients with SSc have been found to have a higher mean heart rate (81 ± 11 BPM), with more cases of sinus tachycardia reported in limited SSc than in diffuse SSc.[19,2123] Myocardial fibrosis that disrupts the normal electrical connectivity of cardiac tissue, left atrial dilation secondary to a higher prevalence of pulmonary hypertension, and more severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, have been proposed as possible underlying mechanisms for SA in SSc.[19]

Figure 1: Arrhythmias in Scleroderma Heart Disease: MRI Findings.

Figure 1:

Delayed enhanced MRI of a patient with scleroderma in short-axis plane shows linear mid-wall enhancement (arrowheads, A) at the medial segments of the interventricular septum. MRI in four-chamber plane shows linear mid-wall enhancement (arrowheads, B) at portions of basal and at the medial segments of the free wall, as well at the medial segment of the interventricular septum. Delayed enhanced MRI in vertical long axis plane shows linear mid-wall enhancement (arrowheads, C) in the majority of the extent of the anterior wall. Resting ECG at the intensive care unit showing paroxysmal AF with rapid ventricular response (right panel). Holter monitoring in the same patient showing isolated supraventricular and ventricular premature extrasystoles.

Figure 2: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Scleroderma.

Figure 2:

A: 12-lead electrocardiogram in a scleroderma patient revealing sinus rhythm with left axis deviation, left atrial enlargement and LV hypertrophy fulfilling voltage criteria, along with deep symmetric T-wave inversions in the precordial leads. T-wave inversions were also noted in the lateral leads (left), suggestive of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring revealing periods of AF (middle), runs of supraventricular tachycardia and frequent couplets of supraventricular extra-systoles (right). B: Transthoracic echocardiogram in the same scleroderma patient revealed increased LV wall thickness with asymmetric involvement of the apex, mid-interventricular septum and the mid-posterior wall (parasternal long-axis view arrows). C: The observed mid-cavity obstruction was due to the systolic apposition of hypertrophied papillary muscle and LV wall, at the level of the mid-LV, producing two distinct LV chambers. D: High Doppler velocities with the characteristic colour turbulent flow, indicating a mid-cavity gradient, were recorded at the level of the papillary muscle. E and F: End-diastole and end-systole, respectively. Cardiac MRI showed hypertrophy of the LV most prominent at the medial wall segments with a spade-like configuration of the LV cavity causing two separate chambers.

Atrial fibrosis, a common feature of clinical AF and a hallmark of arrhythmogenic structural remodelling, is directly related to the degree of left atrial (LA) dilation that accompanies left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in patients with SSc. In those with LV diastolic dysfunction, LA myocyte hypertrophy, LA areas of fibrosis, elevated LA pressure and LA dilation constitute the basis for the occurrence of AF and have been associated with a poor prognosis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease affecting mainly the synovial tissue of small and large joints. Autoantibodies to immunoglobulins (rheumatoid factors) and citrullinated proteins are frequently found in the patients’ sera and the pleural cavity, the lung parenchyma and the heart can be affected in about one-quarter of the patients.[11] The incidence of AF in patients with RA is 40% higher than in the general population and can occur any time during the disease course, although it can be the first disease manifestation.[25] Although the pathophysiology of AF in RA is complex and poorly understood, several lines of evidence support that systemic inflammation causing increased circulating concentrations of inflammatory proteins, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure are important factors for the initiation and recurrence of AF in this patient group.[2527]

It has been shown that the rate of successful cardioversion is lower in patients with RA who have AF and high inflammatory burden with persistently increased serum inflammatory indices.[2729] Increased P wave dispersion in electrocardiography, which is considered to be a predictor of AF, also occurs more frequently in patients with RA and seems to be highly associated with the level of systemic inflammation.[30]

Autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction due to the neurotoxic effect of chronic systemic inflammatory process associated with RA and the side-effects of therapeutic agents, is evident in about 60% of patients with RA. ANS dysfunction is considered a possible pathogenetic cause of SA.[31] The main pattern of ANS deregulation is impairment of cardiovascular reflexes and altered heart rate variability, indicative of reduced cardiac parasympathetic activity and elevated cardiac sympathetic activity manifesting as atrial ectopic beats, impaired heart rate control and inappropriate atrial tachycardia.[32]

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

IIM are rare autoimmune systemic disorders characterised primarily by muscle (polymyositis) and/or skin (dermatomyositis) inflammation.[10,11] Lung and cardiac involvement can be seen in this patient population and they affect survival.[3336] Recent non-invasive diagnostic modalities suggest that cardiac involvement in patients with IIM ranges from 9–72% based on different selection criteria for patients in studies.[37] Myocarditis, focal fibrosis, vasculitis, intimal proliferation or medial sclerosis of vessels have been proposed as possible mechanisms of abnormal electrical activity based on abnormal automaticity.[38] Studies of patients with IIM based on ECG and Holter monitoring showed frequent premature atrial beats, atrial tachycardia, paroxysmal AF and multiple focal right atrial tachycardia mainly caused by abnormal automaticity rather than triggered activity or reentry.[38,39]

Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-associated Vasculitides

AAV are a group of disorders characterised by inflammation of blood vessels, endothelial injury and tissue damage. Although any tissue can be involved in AAV, the upper and lower respiratory tract, the kidneys, the skin and the peripheral nervous system are most commonly and severely affected more frequently rather than the central nervous system.[11]

The three types of AAV are granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA; previously known as Wegener’s granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic GPA (EGPA; previously known as Churg–Strauss syndrome). Autoantibodies to the neutrophil proteins leukocyte proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA) or myeloperoxidase (MPO-ANCA) are typically present, depending on the type of AAV.[11] Clinically significant cardiac involvement is a rare complication in systemic AAV, but it can be life-threatening.[40,41]

Since many cardiac manifestations are clinically silent, at least during their early stages, heart function should be systematically evaluated by ECG and echocardiography. AAV is significantly associated with AF which confers independently worse survival rates.

Several plausible explanations for the association between vasculitis and AF have been proposed; blood vessel wall inflammation results in increased arterial stiffness and decreased vascular distensibility leading to vascular damage and end-organ ischaemia, all of which are considered important mechanisms for atrial tachyarrhythmias in this particular group of patients.[4143] Alteration in microvascular circulation is another possible haemodynamic mechanism.[41] Delay in atrial emptying due to impaired diastolic distensibility that increases pressure and wall stretch within the atria and pulmonary veins is also an important mechanism for altered atrial electrical properties that promotes AF development.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in ARD

Although supraventricular tachycardia is the most common finding in SLE, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can occur and are mainly due to coronary artery disease (CAD).[44,45] VA in SLE can also be the result of inflammatory cardiomyopathy, causing structural and electrical heart disease which may have a serious impact on the patient’s outcome.[46,47] Acute myocarditis in SLE may present with ventricular tachycardia (VT) as an initial manifestation.[48] Figure 3 is a representative case of lupus myocarditis detected with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in our department presenting with frequent ventricular extrasystoles.

Figure 3: Ventricular Arrhythmias in Lupus Myocarditis.

Figure 3:

Representative delayed-enhanced MRI in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus from our records, in four-chamber plane (A), short-axis plane (B) and phase-sensitive inversion recovery image (C), showing thinning and akinesia of the LV lateral wall due to lupus myocarditis (arrowheads). Resting ECG (D) showing sinus rhythm with marked left axis deviation, occasional ventricular premature complexes, poor R-wave progression in the anterior precordial leads and mild ST-segment upsloping in the inferior leads.

Dilated cardiomyopathy with normal coronary arteries can be seen in patients with SLE.[49] Although VA are infrequent among these patients, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Registry revealed a high prevalence of QT prolongation (15.3%) and increased QT dispersion (38.1%), both of which are recognised as independent risk factors for the development of complex VA.[46] Myocardial scar due to ischaemic or non-ischaemic heart disease is the main cause of VA in SLE.

Myocardial inflammation, either isolated or as part of the systemic inflammation, is another important cause of VA in SLE.[4649] In addition, chronic use of antimalarial drugs, which are a common therapeutic modality for SLE, may also lead to VT.[49] Sympathetic hyperactivity as shown by the elevated norepinephrine levels can play an aetiological factor for VA.[6]

Previous studies have reported a decrease in parasympathetic activity due to the autoantibodies against the Sjögren syndrome-related antigen A (Ro/SSA) and M3 muscarinic receptors.[15] The presence of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies in patients with SLE have been associated with prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc).[49] Lazzerini et al. reported that in addition to the high prevalence of QTc prolongation, anti-Ro/SSA-positive patients also have reduced heart rate variability and a high incidence of ventricular late potentials.[49]

VA are common among patients with asymptomatic SSc and may be associated with poor outcome.[2] Patchy or linear myocardial fibrosis provides an ideal substrate for VA dependent on reentrant circuits (Figure 1). VA in patients with SSc can also develop due to overproduction of anti-β1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies which lead to autonomic dysfunction. This usually precedes the development of myocardial fibrosis.[50,51]

VA have been demonstrated in 67% and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 7–13% of unselected patients with SSc.[23,50] Patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions had 50% mortality during 33 months of follow-up, in contrast to 8% in SSc patients without frequent ectopy.[51] Bulkley et al. noted sudden cardiac death (SCD) in 21% of patients with SSc, in contrast to the study by Lee et al. in which no SCD was observed in 61 deaths of 275 patients with SSc.[51,52] In the study by Follansbee et al., SCD was confirmed in 5% of the 1,258 patients with SSc.[53] VA and SCD occur in patients with both skeletal muscle disease and myocardial involvement.

In our study, 63% of patients with SSc had premature ventricular contractions, while 10.5% had non-sustained VT.[20] SSc patients with VA documented by Holter were more likely to have pulmonary hypertension, decreased LV ejection fraction (LVEF), increased RV diameter and LA distention documented by Doppler echocardiography; they also had a greater number of enhancing myocardial segments suggestive of myocardial fibrosis in delayed enhanced CMR.[20]

Involvement of the LV basal infero-septal segment and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction with hypokinetic and dyskinetic areas involving the RV free wall resembling arrhythmogenic RV dysplasia, as well as aneurysms of the RV and RV outflow tract were more commonly seen in patients with SSc with malignant VA than in those without arrhythmias (Figure 4). The extent to which this indicates a causal relationship requires further electrophysiological confirmation. In our unpublished data on 44 consecutive SSc patients with no history of ischaemic cardiomyopathy or risk factors for CAD, delayed enhanced CMR revealed functional and morphological abnormalities in the majority of patients (84%) (Figure 5). Myocardial fibrosis in the RV myocardium which was detected in a small percentage of patients with SSc (6%) by delayed enhanced CMR was associated with poor survival due to the high incidence of malignant VA (Figure 5).

Figure 4: Arrhythogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy in Scleroderma: MRI Findings.

Figure 4:

Left panel: Images of the right ventricle (RV) long axis at end diastole (A) and at end systole (B) show the irregular shape of the RV free wall (black and dark grey areas), with aneurysms (arrows) bulging during diastole and systole in a patient with scleroderma. A delayed contrast-enhanced MRI in the short-axis plane (C) shows increased enhancement (white and light grey areas) of the RV myocardium (arrows) and the interventricular septum (arrowhead) caused by myocardial fibrosis.

Right panel: four-chamber (A) and short-axis views (B) of cine MRI show thinning of the RV free wall with aneurysm formation (arrows) in a patient with scleroderma. Mild flattening of the interventricular septum is also present. Linear enhancement (C, arrows) corresponding to the aneurysmal area, as well as subtle patchy enhancements (arrowheads) in the lower RV insertion point and the anteroseptal medial segment of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium on the delayed-enhancement MR image. The fibrosis in the RV insertion point was suggestive of pulmonary arterial hypertension. RV end-diastolic volume was markedly increased while RV systolic function was impaired with an RV ejection fraction of about 45%. LV systolic function was normal.

Figure 5: Right Ventricular Involvement Detected by MRI on Probability of Survival in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis.

Figure 5:

A: Right ventricular systolic function and regional MRI analysis of kinematic abnormalities in a cohort of scleroderma patients. B. Clinical and MR findings of scleroderma patients with or without pulmonary arterial hypertension. C: Kaplan-Meier analysis of influence of RV myocardial enhancement detected by MRI on probability of survival in patients with systemic sclerosis. D = diffuse; F = female; IVS = interventricular septum; L = limited; M = male; NS = non-significant; PAH = pulmonary arterial hypertension; RV = right ventricular; RVEDVi = right ventricle end-diastolic volume index; RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction; RVESVi = right ventricle end-systolic volume index; RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract; WMA = wall motion abnormalities.

The most common cause of SCD in patients with RA is atherosclerotic CAD that may lead to acute coronary syndrome and VT.[2] Although the underlying mechanisms accounting for the pro-arrhythmogenic substrate in RA are probably intricate, the leading role seems to be played by chronic systemic inflammatory activation as it is able to promote arrhythmias both indirectly by accelerating the development of ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure, and directly by affecting cardiac electrophysiology.[6] Furthermore, there is evidence that the inflammatory cytokines, mainly tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6, can modulate the expression and function of ion channels both by directly acting on cardiomyocytes.[6]

VT has also been described in patients with RA as a consequence of giant cell myocarditis, a rare but fatal cardiac disease complication characterised by degeneration and necrosis of myocardial fibres.[54] VT has also been described in patients with RA related to treatment with methotrexate and infliximab.[55,56] Increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity can play a crucial role in the development of VT in patients with RA.[57]

VT and SCD have also been described in people with IIM, although their incidence has not been precisely defined.[5860] Cardiac involvement with histological evidence of myocarditis is well documented in patients with IIM and may be the most usual cause of VA. The histopathology of the myocarditis resembles inflammation in the skeletal muscles including active myocarditis, focal fibrosis, vasculitis, intimal proliferation and medial sclerosis of vessels.

VA triggered by active vasculitis is uncommonly observed and rarely reported. In AAV infrequently, less than 10%, any cardiac tissue can be affected, with varied clinicopathological syndromes including pericarditis, myocarditis, coronary arteritis, valvulopathy and intracavitary cardiac thrombosis all of which can lead to VA.[40]

Conduction Disturbances in ARD

Conduction defects have been frequently diagnosed in patients with SLE (34–70%) and may be the result of active or past myocarditis.[17] First-degree heart block may be seen and is often transient. Higher degrees of heart block are unusual in adults and are associated with the presence in the patient’s serum of anti-U1-nuclear ribonuclear protein antibodies, but not with anti-Ro/SSA or anti-La/SSB antibodies, as in the case of newborns of mothers with these autoantibodies.[6]

Neonatal lupus is a rare syndrome caused by the trans-placental passage of autoantibodies from mothers positive to anti-Ro/SSA (and/or anti-La/SSB) to their newborns. About 3% of infants whose mothers are antibody-positive develop complete heart block.[61,62] Autopsy studies have revealed focal inflammatory cell infiltrates or, more often, fibrous scarring of the conduction system.[61,62] Small vessel vasculitis and the infiltration by fibrous or granulation tissue are major causes of the dysfunction of sinus or atrioventricular (AV) nodes in SLE. Conduction abnormalities in SLE may regress when the disease is in remission.

Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies in adults with SLE may be associated with an increased likelihood of a prolonged QTc, which has been shown in patients without SLE to be a risk factor for VA and SCD.[6365] The clinical significance of this observation is unclear, given the low threshold (QTc ≥440 msec) used to define prolongation in these studies. However, patients with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies may benefit from having ECGs and receiving appropriate counselling if a prolonged QTc is detected.

Conduction system disease is common in patients with SSc and is present in about 25% of patients with SSc at the resting ECG.[6668] It is likely to be the result of myocardial and conduction system fibrosis.[20,68] Most frequent conduction abnormalities are first-degree heart block (6–10%), left anterior fascicular block (7–16%), right (3–6%) and left (3–6%) bundle branch block and non-specific intra-ventricular conduction defects (2–3%).[21] Second- or third-degree AV block is uncommon (<2%).[6668] Dysfunctional AV node due to fibrotic changes and a linear pattern of myocardial fibrosis with sparing of the subendocardial layer have been proposed as mechanisms responsible for conduction system disorders in patients with SSc.[21,66]

AV block is rare in patients with RA, but usually complete.[6971] Ahern et al. described congenital complete heart block in 0.1% of RA patients, especially in women, and concluded that it is more common in patients with subcutaneous nodules.[69] Rheumatoid granuloma, CAD and non-specific inflammatory lesions are considered to be responsible for conduction disturbances in RA patients.[70,71]

Several types of conduction abnormalities are detectable in patients with IIM, including bundle branch block, fascicular block, first-, second- and third-degree AV block and sick sinus syndrome.[33,72,73] Complete AV block is extremely rare.[72] Direct involvement of the conduction system either due to myositis with contraction band necrosis or due to focal myocardial fibrosis (as a final result of myocarditis or myocardial ischaemia related to coronary vasculitis) have been proposed as possible causal mechanisms.[73]

In an electrophysiology study in four patients with IIM and bifascicular block, the site of block was localised distally to the His bundle suggesting that the conduction disturbances observed in this particular group of patients are mainly related to a direct involvement of the intraventricular conduction system.[74]

ANCA vasculitis has been associated with bundle branch blocks and all grades of heart block. These are believed to be from granulomatous inflammation involving the AV node or the bundle of His.[75] While cardiac involvement is not usual in GPA, conduction abnormalities and accelerated atherosclerosis may occur during the disease course.[76,77]

Diagnostic Algorithm of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with ARD

It is of great importance that an early and accurate diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances is established in patients with ARD, given the fact that the heart involvement can be subclinical.[1,2,7,19,7886] These manifestations in this patient group should be the object of a careful investigation by rheumatologists and cardiologists for all patients with ARD aiming to prevent serious complications including sudden cardiac death.

Classic and newer diagnostic modalities are useful for assessing cardiac function and detecting myocardial involvement and CAD, which are the major substrate for arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in patients with ARD. Clinical, 12-lead electrocardiogram and conventional transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation is the first approach. Newer echocardiographic modalities including 2D/3D speckle-tracking imaging and global longitudinal strain should be used for the early diagnosis of global and regional kinetic disorders of the ventricles, diastolic dysfunction, LV hypertrophy and valvulopathies. However, while a normal echocardiography cannot rule out heart involvement in patients with ARD, PET and CMR can provide reliable diagnostic information about inflammation and scar by performing tissue characterisation.

While the proposed diagnostic algorithm for autoimmune inflammatory cardiomyopathy using PET includes non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF <50%, documented monomorphic/polymorphic VT, ventricular fibrillation or frequent premature ventricular contractions and patchy focal or focal on diffuse fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET imaging, there is no specific algorithm for arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathies using CMR.

However, an expert consensus proposed that CMR provides strong evidence of myocardial inflammation with increasing specificity, if the CMR scan demonstrates the combination of myocardial oedema with other CMR markers of inflammatory myocardial injury.[87] This is based on at least one T2-based criterion including global or regional increase of myocardial T2 relaxation time or an increased signal intensity in T2-weighted CMR images, with at least one T1-based criterion such as increased myocardial T1, extracellular volume, or late gadolinium enhancement. CMR is able to provide a more realistic and more accurate visualisation of the ventricles than other conventional imaging methods.

Endomyocardial biopsy is considered the gold standard to diagnose myocarditis and/or inflammatory cardiomyopathy. However, it is an invasive method with excellent specificity but poor sensitivity due to sampling error given the patchy distribution of myocardial involvement in the majority of patients with ARD and the lack of agreement between specialists regarding interpretation of specimens.

Coronary angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of CAD. Using 24/48-hour Holter monitoring of cardiac rhythm can show specific and nonspecific findings, including any type of arrhythmias, changes of PQ and ST interval, prolongation of QRS complex, rhythm disorders and the presence of Q waves. Electrophysiology studies may be warranted to evaluate persistent palpitations, presyncope or syncope and complex supraventricular and ventricular extrasystoles as assessed in Holter studies in patients with ARD.

Treatment

Optimal immunosuppressive therapy of the underlying systemic disease and management of the arrhythmias based on the international treatment guidelines and evidence-based medicine with respect to the special feature of each disease remains the cornerstone of the correct approach in these patients.[85,86] Unfortunately, there are few randomised controlled trials evaluating anti-arrhythmic therapies specifically for use in patients with ARD. Therefore, therapy should be tailored for each individual patient. Drug selection should be based on their electrophysiological effects and the type of arrhythmia. Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are preferred for the treatment of SA and may improve cardiac perfusion and ventricular function, potentially reducing the burden of arrhythmias.[88,89]

Digoxin can be used to decrease ventricular response in AF and in end-stage heart failure but is contraindicated in those patients with impaired renal function. The treatment of sinus tachycardia and supraventricular and ventricular extrasystoles is generally carried out by β-blockers, taking into account that they may worsen the symptomatology of severe Raynaud’s phenomenon. In these patients, a cardioselective β-blocker, such as bisoprolol, metoprolol and nebivolol, appears to be safe. Amiodarone should be avoided in patients with ARD particularly in those with interstitial lung disease.

Medically intractable life-threatening VT are treated with ICDs. These have been proven to decrease mortality in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and are regarded as a treatment of choice for patients with heart failure and advanced LV dysfunction in combination with resynchronisation pacing.[90,91] The need for ICDs should be carefully evaluated in patients with ARD with proven malignant VA and it will often require further electrophysiological confirmation.

Radiofrequency ablation is an effective approach to many types of arrhythmias.[9298] The role of radiofrequency ablation in patients with ARD has not yet been well evaluated but seems to be promising.

Catheter ablation seems to be safe in drug-resistant AF in patients with SLE and RA.[2,99,100] This approach might be considered as the first-line therapy in patients with AF and systemic disorders, especially in those patients with ARD in whom the use of antiarrhythmic drugs is either contraindicated, scarcely effective, or associated with more adverse effects. Recurrence or persistence of AF after ablation has been attributed to peri-procedural inflammation. Thus, therapies targeting the procedure-related inflammation may reduce the risk of AF recurrence.[99101]

Catheter ablation for atrial tachyarrhythmias, refractory premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachycardia has been successfully applied in patients with IIM SSc and RA.[38,102105] ARD patients considered for RF catheter ablation for AF or VT are those with symptomatic, sustained, monomorphic VT when these are drug resistant, the patient is drug intolerant or does not desire long-term drug therapy.

Pacemaker implantation is the method of choice for the treatment of complete heart block and other serious conduction abnormalities. Sophisticated pacing modalities and programmability as well as low-energy circuity and new battery designs have increased device longevity and enabled wide clinical application.

Conclusion

Early and accurate diagnosis of heart involvement and rhythm disorders in patients with ARD is crucial and affects their overall mortality. Mounting evidence indicates that the increased risk of arrhythmias in patients with ARD is the combined result of the increased prevalence of structural changes (fibrosis) and electrical changes (gap junction impairment and intracellular calcium-handling abnormalities) caused by inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumour necrosis factor α, interleukin-6 and 1, and C-reactive protein. These phenomena promote arrhythmogenesis, by both conduction slowing and increasing ectopic activity, thus impairing the homogeneity of impulse propagation throughout the cardiac tissue.[104,105]

Given the complex nature and course of these diseases, anti-arrhythmic treatment should be based on international guidelines. However, current guidelines contain scant information for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with ARD with mainly class C recommendations.[104106] Therefore, there is a need to update guidelines in collaboration with cardiologists and rheumatologists with simultaneous conduction of a large-scale registry that could improve the treatment of patients with ARD.

Understanding the mechanisms producing arrhythmias in ARD and combining newer diagnostic modalities that will guide new therapeutic strategies would probably improve the quality of life and the survival of patients. Electrophysiology studies may also be warranted to evaluate persistent palpitations, presyncope or syncope and complex supraventricular and ventricular extrasystoles as assessed by Holter studies in patients with ARD.

Even after the diagnosis of the arrhythmia, the electrophysiological evaluation of the arrhythmia substrate can be performed in the electrophysiology laboratory using 3D mapping systems. A detailed voltage mapping can reveal areas with low potential due to extensive fibrosis involved in reentrant circuits in the atria and ventricles.

Current research is focused on improving mapping techniques, developing new imaging modalities, creating new catheter designs for enhanced RF energy delivery and evaluating new energy sources for catheter ablation. Together, these efforts will undoubtedly extend the indications and improve the efficacy of catheter ablation. The integration of CMR data sets in 3D mapping systems could also greatly facilitate electrophysiology procedures.

Further technical and procedural improvements are warranted to bring these techniques to broader clinical practice for patients with ARD.

Clinical Perspective

  • Autoimmune rheumatic disorders (ARD) are inflammatory conditions frequently affecting the blood vessels and the heart.

  • Symptoms of arrhythmias or conduction defects are frequently reported in patients with ARD.

  • The exact prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias in ARD is unclear, due to the small size and heterogeneity of patient populations.

  • Rhythm disorders may have several origins related to primary heart involvement, coronary artery disease, pericardial disease, valvulopathies or pulmonary arterial hypertension and may increase morbidity and mortality.

  • Further prospective large-scale studies are warranted to explore the pathogenesis and to improve the early diagnosis of cardiac rhythm disorders in patients with ARD.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Evangelia Zampeli for reading the manuscript and correcting mistakes and/or omissions.

References

  • 1.Wahren-Herlenius M,, Dörner T. Immunopathogenic mechanisms of systemic autoimmune disease. Lancet. 2013;382:819–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60954-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Seferović PM,, Ristić AD,, Maksimović R, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45::iv39–42. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee HC,, Huang KT,, Wang XL,, Shen WK. Autoantibodies and cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1788–95. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.06.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giannelou M,, Mavragani CP. Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comprehensive update. J Autoimmun. 2017;82:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Theodorou E,, Nezos A,, Antypa E, et al. B-cell activating factor and related genetic variants in lupus related atherosclerosis. J Autoimmun. 2018;92:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lazzerini PE,, Capecchi PL,, Guideri F, et al. Connective tissue diseases and cardiac rhythm disorders: an overview. Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5:306–13. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seferovic PM,, Ristic AD,, Maksimovic R, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 2006;45:39–42. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gawałko M,, Balsam P,, Lodziński P, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in autoimmune diseases. Circ J. 2020;84:685–94. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eisen A,, Arnson Y,, Dovrish Z, et al. Arrhythmias and conduction defects in rheumatological diseases-a comprehensive review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009;39:145–56. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Knockaert DC. Cardiac involvement in systemic inflammatory diseases. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1797–804. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moutsopoulos HM,, Zampeli E, eds. Immunology and Rheumatology in Questions. 2nd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2021. [DOI]
  • 12.Abu-Shakra M,, Urowitz MB,, Gladman DD,, Gough J. Mortality studies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results from a single center. II. Predictor variables for mortality. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1265–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hejtmancik MR,, Wright JC,, Quint R,, Jennings FL. The cardiovascular manifestations of systemic lupus erythemtosus. Am Heart J. 1964;68:119–30. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(64)90248-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Estes D,, Christian CL. The natural history of systemic lupus erythematosus by prospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1971;50:85–95. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197103000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Teixeira RA,, Borba EF,, Bonfá E,, Martinelli Filho M. Arrhythmias in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2010;50:81–9. doi: 10.1590/S0482-50042010000100008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guzmán J,, Cardiel MH,, Arce-Salinas A,, Alarcón-Segovia D. The contribution of resting heart rate and routine blood tests to the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:1845–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mandell BF. Cardiovascular involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1987;17:126–41. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(87)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bourré-Tessier J,, Urowitz MB,, Clarke AE, et al. Electrocardiographic findings in systemic lupus erythematosus: data from an international inception cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:128–35. doi: 10.1002/acr.22370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mavrogeni S,, Gargani L,, Pepe A, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance predicts ventricular arrhythmias in scleroderma: the Scleroderma Arrhythmia Clinical Utility Study (SAnCtUS). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:1938–48. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tzelepis GE,, Kelekis NL,, Plastiras SC, et al. Pattern and distribution of myocardial fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: a delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3827–36. doi: 10.1002/art.22971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rokas S,, Mavrikakis M,, Agrios N, et al. Electrophysiologic abnormalities of cardiac function in progressive systemic sclerosis. J Electrocardiol. 1996;29:17–25. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0736(96)80107-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Biełous-Wilk A,, Poreba M,, Staniszewska-Marszałek E, et al. Electrocardiographic evaluation in patients with systemic scleroderma and without clinically evident heart disease. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009;14:251–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00306.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kostis JB,, Seibold JR,, Turkevich D, et al. Prognostic importance of cardiac arrhythmias in systemic sclerosis. Am J Med. 1988;84:1007–15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90305-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borowiec A,, Dabrowski R,, Wozniak J, et al. Cardiovascular assessment of asymptomatic patients with juvenile-onset localized and systemic scleroderma: 10 years prospective observation. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41:33–8. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2011.609489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tłustochowicz W,, Piotrowicz R,, Cwetsch A, et al. 24-h ECG monitoring in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Heart J. 1995;16:848–51. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wisłowska M,, Sypuła S,, Kowalik I. Echocardiographic findings and 24-h electrocardiographic Holter monitoring in patients with nodular and non-nodular rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 1999;18:163–9. doi: 10.1007/s002960050079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Engelmann MD,, Svendsen JH. Inflammation in the genesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2083–92. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Issac TT,, Dokainish H,, Lakkis NM. Role of inflammation in initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the published data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2021–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu T,, Li G,, Li L,, Korantzopoulos P. Association between C-reactive protein and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1642–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guler H,, Seyfeli E,, Sahin G, et al. P wave dispersion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: its relation with clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Rheumatol Int. 2007;27:813–8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0307-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schwemmer S,, Beer P,, Sch–lmerich J, et al. Cardiovascular and pupillary autonomic nervous dysfunction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis – a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24:683–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sheldon RS,, Grubb BP 2nd,, Olshansky B, et al. Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm. 2015;2015;12:e41–63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bohan A,, Peter JB,, Bowman RL,, Pearson CM. Computer-assisted analysis of 153 patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977;56:255–86. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197707000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stern R,, Godbold JH,, Chess Q,, Kagen LJ. ECG abnormalities in polymyositis. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:2185–9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.144.11.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gonzalez-Lopez L,, Gamez-Nava JI,, Sanchez L, et al. Cardiac manifestations in dermato-polymyositis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1996;14:373–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Taylor AJ,, Wortham DC,, Burge JR,, Rogan KM. The heart in polymyositis: a prospective evaluation of 26 patients. Clin Cardiol. 1993;16:802–8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960161110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang L,, Wang GC,, Ma L,, Zu N. Cardiac involvement in adult polymyositis or dermatomyositis: a systematic review. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35:686–91. doi: 10.1002/clc.22026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yazaki K,, Enta K,, Kataoka S, et al. Focal right atrial tachycardia with three foci in a patient with polymyositis. J Cardiol Cases. 2017;16:134–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lundberg IE. Cardiac involvement in autoimmune myositis and mixed connective tissue disease. Lupus. 2005;14:708–12. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2205oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miloslavsky E,, Unizony S. The heart in vasculitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014;40:11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gayraud M,, Guillevin L,, le Toumelin P, et al. Long-term followup of polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis, and Churg-Strauss syndrome: analysis of four prospective trials including 278 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:666–75. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200103)44:3&#x0003c;666::AID-ANR116&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lane SE,, Watts RA,, Shepstone L,, Scott DG. Primary systemic vasculitis: clinical features and mortality. QJM. 2005;98:97–111. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guillevin L,, Durand-Gasselin B,, Cevallos R, et al. Microscopic polyangiitis: clinical and laboratory findings in eighty-five patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:421–30. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3&#x0003c;421::AID-ANR5&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Miner JJ,, Kim AH. Cardiac manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014;40:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hashkes PJ,, Wexler LF,, Passo MH. Coronary artery disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: risk factors, assessment, and prevention. J Clin Rheumatol. 1997;3:203–10. doi: 10.1097/00124743-199708000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gawałko M,, Balsam P,, Lodziński P, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in autoimmune diseases. Circ J. 2020;84:685–94. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Huang CN,, Yu HH,, Chiu SN, et al. Acute myocarditis and ventricular fibrillation as initial presentation of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:1093–6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2240-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mavrogeni SI,, Sfikakis PP,, Dimitroulas T, et al. Prospects of using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the identification of arrhythmogenic substrate in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38:1615–21. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4110-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lazzerini PE,, Acampa M,, Guideri F, et al. Prolongation of the corrected QT interval in adult patients with anti-Ro/SSA-positive connective tissue diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1248–52. doi: 10.1002/art.20130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ferri C,, Bernini L,, Bongiorni MG, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac dysrhythmias, and their relationship with multisystemic symptoms, in progressive systemic sclerosis patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:1259–66. doi: 10.1002/art.1780281110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bulkley BH,, Ridolfi RL,, Salyer WR,, Hutchins GM. Myocardial lesions of progressive systemic sclerosis. A cause of cardiac dysfunction. Circulation. 1976;53:483–90. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.53.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lee P,, Langevitz P,, Alderdice CA, et al. Mortality in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Q J Med. 1992;82:139–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Follansbee WP,, Zerbe TR,, Medsger TA Jr. Cardiac and skeletal muscle disease in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): a high risk association. Am Heart J. 1993;125:194–203. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90075-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rosenstein ED,, Zucker MJ,, Kramer N. Giant cell myocarditis: most fatal of autoimmune diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000;30:1–16. doi: 10.1053/sarh.2000.8367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Borek G,, Jenzer HR,, Frey LD,, Locher JT. Repetitive exercise induced ventricular tachycardia in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis taking low dose methotrexate. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:1004–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lazzerini PE,, Acampa M,, Hammoud M, et al. Arrhythmic risk during acute infusion of infliximab: a prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in patients with chronic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1958–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schwemmer S,, Beer P,, Sch–lmerich J, et al. Cardiovascular and pupillary autonomic nervous dysfunction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis – a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24:683–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jindal G,, Singh S,, Suri D, et al. Recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a child with juvenile dermatomyositis – an unusual association. Int J Rheum Dis. 2012;15:e26–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2012.01701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dilaveris P,, Pietri P,, Tsiachris D, et al. Inducible ventricular tachycardia due to dermatomyositis-related cardiomyopathy in the era of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Circulation. 2012;125:967–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.049882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Adler M,, Banerjeee S,, Stratton R. Ventricular tachycardia as a presenting feature of dermatomyositis. Heart. 2002;88:443. doi: 10.1136/heart.88.5.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.James TN,, Rupe CE,, Monto RW. Pathology of the cardiac conduction system in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Intern Med. 1965;63:402–10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-63-3-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Maisch B, Ristić AD. Immunological basis of the cardiac conduction and rhythm disorders. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:813–24. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xiao GQ,, Hu K,, Boutjdir M. Direct inhibition of expressed cardiac l- and T-type calcium channels by IGG from mothers whose children have congenital heart block. Circulation. 2001;103:1599–604. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.11.1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cardoso CR,, Sales MA,, Papi JA,, Salles GF. QT-interval parameters are increased in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2005;14:846–52. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2225oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bourr é-Tessier J,, Clarke AE,, Huynh T, et al. Prolonged corrected QT interval in anti-Ro/SSA-positive adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:1031–7. doi: 10.1002/acr.20470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Roberts NK,, Cabeen WR Jr,, Moss J, et al. The prevalence of conduction defects and cardiac arrhythmias in progressive systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:38–40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-94-1-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Janosik DL,, Osborn TG,, Moore TL, et al. Heart disease in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1989;19:191–200. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(89)90032-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ridolfi RL,, Bulkley BH,, Hutchins GM. The cardiac conduction system in progressive systemic sclerosis. Clinical and pathologic features of 35 patients. Am J Med. 1976;61:361–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90373-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ahern M,, Lever JV,, Cosh J. Complete heart block in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983;42:389–97. doi: 10.1136/ard.42.4.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wallberg-Jonsson S,, Ohman ML,, Dahlqvist SR. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis in Northern Sweden. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:445–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Solomon DH,, Karlson EW,, Rimm EB, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in women diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation. 2003;107:1303–7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000054612.26458.B2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Alyan O,, Ozdemir O,, Geyik B,, Demirkan D. Polymyositis complicated with complete atrioventricular block – a case report and review of the literature. Angiology. 2003;54:729–31. doi: 10.1177/000331970305400615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tami LF,, Bhasin S. Polymorphism of the cardiac manifestations in dermatomyositis. Clin Cardiol. 1993;16:260–4. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960160319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kehoe RF,, Bauernfeind R,, Tommaso C, et al. Cardiac conduction defects in polymyositis: electrophysiologic studies in four patients. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:41–3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-94-1-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kane GC,, Keogh KA. Involvement of the heart by small and medium vessel vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21:29–34. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32831cb94d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.de Leeuw K,, Sanders JS,, Stegeman C, et al. Accelerated atherosclerosis in patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:753–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.029033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Faurschou M,, Mellemkjaer L,, Sorensen IJ, et al. Increased morbidity from ischemic heart disease in patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1187–92. doi: 10.1002/art.24386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.England BR,, Thiele GM,, Anderson DR,, Mikuls TR. Increased cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms and implications. BMJ. 2018;361:k1036. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ocampo-Piraquive V,, Nieto-Aristizábal I,, Cañas CA,, Tobón GJ. Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus: causes, predictors and interventions. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14:1043–53. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1538789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Plastiras SC,, Karadimitrakis SP,, Kampolis C, et al. Determinants of pulmonary arterial hypertension in scleroderma. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;36:392–6. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tyndall AJ,, Bannert B,, Vonk M, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1809–15. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.114264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Elhai M,, Meune C,, Boubaya M, et al. Mapping and predicting mortality from systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1897–905. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gabriel SE. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med. 2008;121:S9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jayakumar D,, Zhang R,, Wasserman A,, Ash J. Cardiac manifestations in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: an overview. Cardiol Rev. 2019;27:131–7. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chang C. Unmet needs in the treatment of autoimmunity: from aspirin to stem cells. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:331–46. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bournia VK,, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG,, Selmi C, et al. Recent advances in the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009;36:176–200. doi: 10.1007/s12016-008-8114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ferreira VM,, Schulz-Menger J,, Holmvang G, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:3158–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Desai CS,, Lee DC,, Shah SJ. Systemic sclerosis and the heart: current diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:545–54. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32834b8975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Allanore Y,, Meune C,, Vonk MC, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with left ventricular dysfunction in the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) database of patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:218–221. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.103382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Katritsis DG,, Boriani G,, Cosio FG, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias. Europace. 2017;19:465–511. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Al-Khatib SM,, Stevenson WG,, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: executive summary. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:e190–252. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Priori SG,, Blomstr–m-Lundqvist C,, Mazzanti A, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Europace. 2015;17:1601–87. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Fragakis N,, Pantos I,, Younis J, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2012;14:1545–52. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Katritsis D,, Merchant FM,, Mela T, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation the search for substrate-driven end points. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2293–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Katritsis DG,, Josephson ME. Classification, electrophysiological features and therapy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5:130–5. doi: 10.15420/AER.2016.18.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Katritsis G,, Calkins H. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation – techniques and technology. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2012;1:29–33. doi: 10.15420/aer.2012.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Prabhu S,, Lim WH,, Schilling RJ. The evolving role of catheter ablation in patients with heart failure and AF. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2019;8:47–53. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.9.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mahida S,, Berte B,, Yamashita S, et al. New ablation technologies and techniques. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014;3:107–12. doi: 10.15420/aer.2014.3.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Katritsis GD,, Katritsis DG. Cardiac autonomic denervation for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014;3:113–5. doi: 10.15420/aer.2014.3.2.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Calkins H,, Kuck KH,, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;33:171–257. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9672-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ho KM,, Tan JA. Benefits and risks of corticosteroid prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery: a dose-response meta-analysis. Circulation. 2009;119:1853–66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.848218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Schmidt M,, Christiansen CF,, Mehnert F, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2011;343:d3450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chatzidou S,, Repasos V,, Palios J,, Plastiras S. Usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in supraventricular tachycardia ablation in a scleroderma patient. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017;58:159–60. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lacroix D,, Brigadeau F,, Marquié C,, Klug D. Electroanatomic mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia associated with systemic sclerosis. Europace. 2004;6:336–42. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Lazzerini PE,, Capecchi PL,, Laghi-Pasini F. Systemic inflammation and arrhythmic risk: lessons from rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1717–27. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Schleifer JW,, Sorajja D,, Shen WK. Advances in the pharmacologic treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16:2637–2651. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1100170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review are provided here courtesy of Radcliffe Cardiology

RESOURCES