Skip to main content
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
letter
. 2021 Jan 11;9(2):e1587. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1587

Gain‐of‐function mutation Met136Val in SCN8A may not be a common cause of trigeminal neuralgia

Raymond F Sekula 1, Kathleen Deeley 2, Hayley Denwood 1, Alexandre R Vieira 2,
PMCID: PMC8077135  PMID: 33428824

Abstract

Background

The Met136Val mutation in SCN8A was described in a case of trigeminal neuralgia but no frequency among affected individuals was provided.

Methods

Direct sequencing of 123 individuals diagnosed with classic trigeminal neuralgia was performed aimed to detect the Met136Val change.

Results

No cases of classical trigeminal neuralgia studied had the Met136Val mutation in SCN8A.

Conclusion

Met136Val mutation in SCN8A is not a frequent cause of classical trigeminal neuralgia.


This paper provides evidence that the SCN8A Met136Val is not a common cause of trigeminal neuralgia.

graphic file with name MGG3-9-e1587-g001.jpg


Classical trigeminal neuralgia (cTN, OMIM accession number 190400) is a neuropathic pain disorder marked by evoked and spontaneous attacks in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve, and the disorder is further associated with the periods of complete remission and subsequent recurrence in most patients. The pain of cTN is considered to be among the most debilitating types of pain (Cruccu et al., 2010). Neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve has been accepted as the cause of cTN in a majority of patients by the International Headache Society. The condition is usually sporadic, although a recent publication suggests that familial occurrence may be more common than previously considered (Di Stefano et al., 2020). A mutation in SCN8A (OMIM accession number 600702. GenBank AH007414.2), a sodium channel gene that codes for the Nav1.6 protein, was reported in a 64‐year‐old white female that presented with classical trigeminal neuralgia. The Met136Val change (NM_014191.4:c.406A>G) produced a number of detectable changes in neurotransmission. It was possible to detect a significant increase in peak transient and resurgent currents of Nav1.6. The mutation also reduced the threshold for action potential in trigeminal ganglia neurons and enhanced the neuronal evoked response and the fraction of neurons that fire at a higher rate than those expressing wild‐type channels (Tanaka et al., 2016). Pathogenic variants in SCN8A are also known to cause SCN8A‐related epileptic encephalopathy (Hammer et al., 2016). Since it was not clear from the original report how frequent the Met136Val variant in SCN8A is among individuals with trigeminal neuralgia, we tested the hypothesis that the mutation SCN8A Met136Val is an infrequent finding in individuals with trigeminal neuralgia.

One hundred and twenty‐three individuals diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia were recruited since January 2016 to be part of our Orofacial Pain Registry and Sample Repository project (IRB approval # 15110027). They were 81 females, 110 non‐Hispanic Whites, and all adults at least 45 years of age. These individuals provided written informed consent and a biological sample (unstimulated saliva) and are from the most part from the western Pennsylvania region. All cases were diagnosed by the same professional (R.F.S.) using the same criteria. DNA was extracted from saliva according to a published protocol (Deeley et al., 2016) and samples were sequenced in both directions to determine the presence of the SCN8A Met136Val mutation in the exon 4 of the gene. We designed a set of primers (5ʹ TGT GCT TCA TCT CCT TTC AGG 3ʹ forward and 5ʹ CCA CAT TCT TCG ACC AGT CA 3ʹ reverse) using the Primer3 online software (http://primer3.ut.ee/). Polymerase chain reactions conditions were 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute, followed by a 7‐minute hold at 72°C. All samples were sequence in both directions. Sequences were analyzed using the DNA Analysis Software Sequencher 5.0 (Sequencher 5.0: Gene Codes; http://genecodes.com/).

We did not find any case with the SCN8A Met136Val, which suggests that this mutation is an infrequent cause of cTN.

These findings should help guide future study designs that aim to identify the associations between sodium channel genes and trigeminal neuralgia. Analyses of common variants of Nav1.7 (SCN9A rs6746030) and nerve growth factor receptor (NTRK1 rs633) of 48 individuals did not show overrepresentation of alleles in cases with trigeminal neuralgia (Costa et al., 2019) and it is reasonable to propose that future studies should instead focus on detecting rare variants that may each account for small fractions of the population of patients with cTN (Di Stefano et al., 2020).

ETHICAL COMPLIANCE

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Raymond F. Sekula: Proposed the concept, designed the study, collected and interpreted the data, obtained support, and critically revised the manuscript. Kathleen Deeley: Collected, generated, and analyzed the data, and critically revised the manuscript. Hayley Denwood: Generated data and critically revised the manuscript. Alexandre R. Vieira: Proposed the concept, designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, obtained support, and wrote the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the enthusiastic participation of all subjects.

Sekula RF, Deeley K, Denwood H, Vieira AR. Gain‐of‐function mutation Met136Val in SCN8A may not be a common cause of trigeminal neuralgia. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021;9:e1587. 10.1002/mgg3.1587

REFERENCES

  1. Costa, G. M. F. , Rocha, L. P. C. , Siqueira, S. R. D. T. , Moreira, P. R. , & Almeida‐Leite, C. M. (2019). No association of polymorphisms in Nav1.7 or nerve growth factor receptor genes with trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Medicine, 20, 1362–1369. 10.1093/pm/pny191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cruccu, G. , Bonamico, L. H. , & Zakrzewska, J. M. (2010). Cranial neuralgias. The Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 97, 663–678. 10.1016/S0072-9752(10)97056-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deeley, K. , Noel, J. , & Vieira, A. R. (2016). Comparative study of five commercially available saliva collection kits for DNA extraction. Clinical Laboratory, 62, 1809–1813. 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Stefano, G. , Yuan, J.‐H. , Cruccu, G. , Waxman, S. G. , Dib‐Hajj, S. D. , & Truini, A. (2020). Familial trigeminal neuralgia – a systematic clinical study with a genomic screen of the neuronal electrogenisome. Cephalalgia, 40, 767–777. 10.1177/0333102419897623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammer, M. F. , Wagnon, J. L. , Mefford, H. C. , Meisler, M. H. , Adam, M. P. , Ardinger, H. H. , Pagon, R. A. , Wallace, S. E. , Bean, L. J. H. , Stephens, K. , & Amemiya, A. (2016). SCN8A‐related epilepsy with encephalopathy. GeneReviews® [Internet]. : University of Washington. 1993–2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanaka, B. S. , Zhao, P. , Dib‐Hajj, F. B. , Morisset, V. , Tate, S. , Waxman, S. G. , & Dib‐Hajj, S. D. (2016). A gain‐of‐function mutation in Nav1.6 in a case of trigeminal neuralgia. Molecular Medicine, 2, 338–348. 10.2119/molmed.2016.00131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES