Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2021 Mar 2;9(4):2144–2148. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3966

Ending a diagnostic odyssey—The first case of Takenouchi–Kosaki syndrome in an African patient

Kaitlyn Flynn 1, Candice Feben 1, Lindiwe Lamola 1, Nadia Carstens 1, Amanda Krause 1, Zané Lombard 1,; for DDD‐Africa as members of the H3Africa Consortium
PMCID: PMC8077267  PMID: 33936654

Abstract

First reported case of Takenouchi–Kosaki syndrome in an African patient with a de novo likely pathogenic missense variant identified in the CDC42 gene.

Keywords: CDC42, macrothrombocytopenia, Takenouchi–Kosaki syndrome, whole‐exome sequencing


First reported case of Takenouchi–Kosaki syndrome in an African patient with a de novo, likely pathogenic missense variant identified in the CDC42 gene.

graphic file with name CCR3-9-2144-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Takenouchi–Kosaki syndrome (OMIM #616737), also known as Macrothrombocytopenia and Mental Retardation (MMR) syndrome, is an autosomal dominant, clinically heterogeneous disorder, characterized by multi‐systemic involvement, and developmental delay. 1 , 2 The syndrome first described in 2015, is associated with heterozygous pathogenic variants in the cell division control protein 42 homolog (CDC42) gene and has been described in a very limited number of individuals in the published literature. 1 , 2 The core phenotype includes intellectual disability, cardiac anomalies, sensorineural deafness, frequent infections, platelet abnormalities and structural brain defects; however, some affected individuals appear to present with a milder phenotype redolent of Noonan syndrome. 2

2. CASE REPORT

The female proband was born to a nonconsanguineous couple with no medical complaints. The pregnancy was uncomplicated, apart from a threatened miscarriage at 16 weeks gestation, with no maternal illnesses or teratogenic exposures reported. The proband was delivered at term by Cesarean section, indicated for meconium‐stained liquor. Her birth weight was 2.9 kg (10th‐25th centile). Her other birth parameters were not available. She was admitted postnatally for two weeks with a complex congenital cardiac defect, shown on echocardiography to include transposition of the great arteries, an atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and subpulmonic pulmonary stenosis. The infant was initially referred to the Genetics Clinic at the Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH) in Johannesburg, South Africa, at the age of 6 months for an assessment, on the basis of her cardiac disease and associated dysmorphic features. At this assessment, she was noted to have failure to thrive, hypotonia and a number of unusual features, including a short neck with a thickened nuchal skin fold, a short nose with anteverted nares, low‐set posteriorly rotated ears, epicanthus inversus, a wide intermammillary distance and sparse scalp hair. She was assessed serially at the Genetic, Cardiac, Neurodevelopmental and Endocrine Clinics at the RMMCH over the next few years. At her most recent assessment, at 9 years, 8 months of age, she was microcephalic, with short stature and was noted to have dental malocclusion in addition to the previously documented dysmorphic features (Figure 1). Neurodevelopmental assessment identified inappropriate fine motor development, abnormal behavior (occasionally aggressive and hyperactive) and moderate intellectual disability. Baseline genetic testing included a CytoScan™ HD array (Thermo Fisher), which was reported as negative for any significant copy number variants. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain at 15 months of age showed no structural abnormalities and a renal ultrasound was normal. At 10 years of age, the patient was recruited to the Deciphering Developmental Disorders in Africa (DDD‐Africa) study for whole‐exome sequencing (WES). The DDD‐Africa study aims to evaluate exome sequencing in an African setting to allow for the sustainable integration of whole‐exome sequencing in developmental disorder diagnostics. The patient's family gave their informed consent prior to the patient's inclusion in the study. The research was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand (HREC: 190578).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Facial features of proband. A, Frontal view. B, Side profile

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples, using a modified version of the salting out method. 3 WES was performed using the Thermo Fisher Ion Torrent S5™ next‐generation sequencing platform and the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Exome RDY Kit (Thermo Fisher) as per the standard protocol. The average sequencing coverage of this sample was 150×. Data analysis was performed using the Moon (Invitae) software (v.3.2.0). 4 A missense variant in the CDC42 gene (NM_001791.4 c.68A>G, p.Tyr23Cys) was identified. The variant was validated through Sanger sequencing. Parental samples were sequenced and the data confirmed that both parents are homozygous for the reference allele indicating a de novo occurrence of the missense variant in the child (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

CDC42 c.68A>G variant validation through Sanger sequencing. A, Electropherogram identifying the patient as an A/G heterozygote (variant is present). B, Electropherogram identifying the patient's mother as an A/A homozygote (variant is absent). C, Electropherogram identifying the patient's father as an A/A homozygote (variant is absent). The variant location is indicated by the black arrows

Classification of the variant was performed following the recommendations and guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. 5 Reviewed together with the clinical phenotype of this patient, we classified the p.Tyr23Cys variant as likely pathogenic (Class IV). The variant is located in the N‐terminal α‐Helix of the Ras domain 2 , 6 (PM1). The variant is absent in population databases 7 (PM2) and has two pathogenic submissions in ClinVar 8 (PP5; SCV000244190, SCV001250374). Available literature provides a well‐conducted in vivo, in vitro and in silico functional study that shows the variant to have a deleterious effect 2 (PS3_Supporting). The CDC42 gene has a low rate of benign missense variants and pathogenic missense variants are common 7 , 9 (PP2). In silico prediction tools suggest that the c.68A>G variant would have a deleterious effect on the protein 3 (PP3). Sanger sequencing determined de novo inheritance of the variant, without maternity and paternity confirmed (PM6).

Based on the diagnosis of MMR syndrome in the proband, further recommendations for care were made, including an ophthalmologic assessment (for associated strabismus and optic atrophy), hearing test (for sensorineural hearing loss), full blood count and platelet count (to screen for thrombocytopaenia) and regular clinical spinal evaluation (for scoliosis). 2

3. DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of MMR syndrome in an African patient. The phenotypic information presented contributes to the body of knowledge about this rare condition.

The CDC42 gene encodes a small GTPase protein of the Rho‐subfamily, which is known to regulate signalling pathways, controlling multiple cellular functions such as migration, morphology, cell cycle progression, and endocytosis. 10 The variant identified in this patient (c.68A>G) affects the 23rd amino acid (p.Tyr23Cys) of this 191 amino acid protein. The specific amino acid (Tyr23) is located at the N‐terminal alpha helix with the protein product present at the CDC42 surface and involved with PAK1 (P21 (RAC1) Activated Kinase 1) binding and WASP (Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein) binding to the GTPase. 2 , 11 The amino acid change (p.Tyr23Cys) results in reduced WASP interaction, as well as impaired binding to PAK1 and FMNL2 (formin like protein 2) as identified in the functional study conducted by Martinelli et al. 2 The authors categorized known CDC42 mutations into three groups according to their positions within the CDC42 structure. Based on the results reported in the same paper, the Tyr23Cys substitution is classified as a Group III CDC42 mutation together with c.62T>C (p.Ile21Thr) and c.511G>A (p.Glu171Lys). 2

A comparison of the clinical phenotype of a 14 year old patient with the p.Tyr23Cys variant 2 and five patients with other Group III CDC42 variants 2 and our proband is presented in Table 1. Unlike reported patients with Group I and II variants, thrombocytopenia and dysmorphism resembling Noonan syndrome respectively, do not appear to be associated with Group III variants. 2

TABLE 1.

Comparison of clinical phenotype of reported patients with Group III pathogenic variants in CDC42

Clinical phenotype

Group III pathogenic variant2

N = 5

Tyr23Cys variant2 Proband
Growth abnormality
Postnatal weight ≤ 2SD 0/3 + +
Postnatal OFC ≤ 2SD 2/3 (66%) + +
Postnatal growth deficiency 3/5 (60%) + +
Intellectual disability 1/5 (20%) Severe Moderate
MRI brain abnormality 0/1 +
Seizures 0/5 +
Facial dysmorphism 5/5 (100%) + +
Cardiac anomalies 2/5 (40%) +

4. CONCLUSION

Despite the identification of a complex cardiac abnormality at birth and the subsequent development of numerous clinical problems, including neurodevelopmental delay and poor growth, a diagnosis to explain the phenotype in our proband was only reached after a decade by using WES. Although there are numerous examples of the utility of WES in reaching diagnoses in individuals with multiple congenital anomalies and the use of WES as a first‐tier diagnostic test in these cases has been recommended, 12 this testing modality remains unavailable to many individuals affected by genetic disorders in low‐ and middle‐income countries. The DDD‐Africa study is a research study aiming to fill this gap. The example of the use of WES technology in the proband presented here, one of the first patients in the study tested, provides convincing evidence of the need for this technology in under‐resourced countries to end the diagnostic odyssey faced by so many children with congenital anomalies. The implementation will additionally further fulfill the need to characterize developmental disorders in Africa, where they are largely undescribed and undocumented both clinically and molecularly.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

KF: conducted the literature search on the topic, performed the whole‐exome sequencing and variant validation, and drafted the initial version of the manuscript. CF: provided the clinical information, contributed to drafting and providing critical revision of the manuscript. LL, NC and AK: aided in clinical and variant interpretation and data analysis, and provided critical review of the manuscript. ZL: is the primary investigator of the DDD‐Africa study, conceptualized the study, raised the funds to perform the study, aided in variant interpretation and data analysis, and provided critical review of the manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Ethical approval was received from the Human Research Ethical Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa for the DDD‐Africa study (M180678) as well as for the student substudy (M190578).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge our research participants for their contribution by participating in this study, as well as the larger DDD‐Africa research team. We would also like to thank all of our funders. Published with written consent of the patient.

Flynn K, Feben C, Lamola L, Carstens N, Krause A, Lombard Z; for DDD‐Africa as members of the H3Africa Consortium . Ending a diagnostic odyssey—The first case of Takenouchi–Kosaki syndrome in an African patient. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9:2144–2148. 10.1002/ccr3.3966

Funding information

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U01MH115483. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This work is based on the research supported in part by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Reference Number MND190816467571). The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are that of the author(s) and do not represent the official views of the NRF.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Takenouchi T, Kosaki R, Niizuma T, et al. Macrothrombocytopenia and developmental delay with a de novo CDC42 mutation: yet another locus for thrombocytopenia and developmental delay. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2015;167A:2822‐2825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Martinelli S, Krumbach O, Pantaleoni F, et al. Functional dysregulation of CDC42 Causes diverse developmental phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:309‐320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;11:1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Clark M, Hildreth A, Batalov S, et al. Diagnosis of genetic disease in seriously ill children by rapid whole‐genome sequencing and automated phenotyping and interpretation. Sci Tansl Med. 2019;11:eaat6177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405‐424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. El‐Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D427‐D432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434‐443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Landrum MJ, Kattman BL. ClinVar at five years: delivering on the promise. Hum Mut. 2018;39:1623‐1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, et al. VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:1937‐1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Johnson D, Pringle J. Molecular characterisation of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J Cell Bio. 1990;111:143‐152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Garrard S, Capaldo C, Gao L, et al. Structure of Cdc42 in a complex GTPase‐binding domain of the cell polarity protein, Par 6. EMBO J. 2003;22:1125‐1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Srivastava S, Love‐Nichols JA, Dies KA, et al. Meta‐analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first‐tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet Med. 2019;21:2413‐2421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES