Skip to main content
Case Reports in Oncology logoLink to Case Reports in Oncology
. 2021 Mar 22;14(1):520–524. doi: 10.1159/000514191

Accurate Monitoring of the Response of Bone Metastases to Treatment in Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Choline PET/CT

Kazuhiro Kitajima a,*, Shingo Yamamoto b, Masayuki Fujiwara a, Yusuke Kawanaka a, Yusuke Yamada b, Seiji Nagasawa b, Kimihiro Shimatani b, Takeshi Hanasaki b, Motohiro Taguchi b, Akihiro Kanematsu b, Koichiro Yamakado a
PMCID: PMC8077372  PMID: 33976628

Abstract

We here report 2 cases of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) observed two times on <sup>11</sup>C-choline positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT), which was useful to discriminate viable progressive osteoblastic bone metastasis from benign osteoblastic change induced by the treatment effect and to determine the viability of bone metastases, regardless of whether sclerosis was present or not. Because one case demonstrated disappearance of abnormal <sup>11</sup>C-choline uptake of osteoblastic metastatic lesions after abiraterone therapy and no new lesions at other sites, suggesting nonviable bone metastases, we can assume a complete metabolic response. Because the other case demonstrated a decrease in the existing, abnormal <sup>11</sup>C-choline uptake of osteoblastic metastatic lesions, but multiple new appearances of osteoblastic and nonosteoblastic lesions with abnormal <sup>11</sup>C-choline uptake after radium-223 therapy suggesting multiple viable bone metastases, we can assume progressive metabolic disease. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT could help in assessing the treatment response of bone metastases in patients with metastatic CRPC.

Keywords: Castration-resistant prostate cancer, Choline PET/CT, Bone metastasis, Treatment response

Introduction

Prostate cancer ranks as the most common lethal malignancy diagnosed and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in Western countries. Although high response rates are achieved using androgen blockade as first-line therapy, most men progress toward hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Systemic chemotherapies have been shown to improve clinical outcome in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients; however, they are not curative. Due to the high incidence of bone involvement in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, assessment of treatment response in prostate cancer metastatic to the bone remains a major clinical need.

Most advanced prostate cancer patients may harbor both viable osteoblastic bone metastases and treatment-induced sclerosis during the treatment course. Although computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy are widely used to survey these calcified lesions, they are unable to discriminate between these two entities. On the other hand, choline positron emission tomography CT (PET/CT) can directly detect viable bone metastases in prostate cancer, regardless of whether sclerosis is present or not. Moreover, choline PET/CT can discriminate viable progressive osteoblastic bone metastasis from benign osteoblastic change induced by the treatment effect. Here we demonstrate 2 cases in which choline PET/CT was very useful to determine the viability of bone metastases and assess the treatment response of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

Case Report

Case 1

Three years previously, a 64-year-old man with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (Gleason score 5 + 5), a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 1.55 ng/mL (normal PSA value), and a clinical stage of T3bN1M1b underwent maximum androgen blockade therapy and castration as initial treatments. The PSA value increased and docetaxel was started with the diagnosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, in the latest half-year, the PSA value gradually increased by 0.006 ng/mL to 0.041 ng/mL, and the patient underwent a first 11C-choline PET/CT examination to evaluate his current disease status. 11C-choline PET/CT showed multiple osteoblastic lesions in the spine, pelvis, and ribs with no 11C-choline uptake, reflecting treatment-induced sclerosis during the treatment course, as well as several instances of abnormal 11C-choline uptake in the thoracic and lumbar spine sclerosis, suggesting viable tumors (Fig. 1a). New hormonal therapy (abiraterone) was started, which improved the PSA level to 0.008 ng/mL after 6 months. The second 11C-choline PET/CT 6 months after starting abiraterone showed disappearance of the abnormal 11C-choline uptake seen on the first 11C-choline PET/CT and no new lesions at other sites, suggesting nonviable bone metastases (Fig. 1b). We can assume a complete metabolic response according to the two 11C-choline PET/CT scans.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A 64-year-old man with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone. a The first 11C-choline PET/CT before abiraterone therapy showed multiple osteoblastic lesions in the spine, pelvis, and ribs with no 11C-choline uptake, reflecting treatment-induced sclerosis during the treatment course, as well as several instances of abnormal 11C-choline uptake in the thoracic and lumbar spine sclerosis, suggesting viable tumors. b The second 11C-choline PET/CT 6 months after starting abiraterone showed disappearance of the abnormal 11C-choline uptake seen on the first 11C-choline PET/CT (a) and no new lesions at other sites, suggesting nonviable bone metastases. We can assume a complete metabolic response according to the two 11C-choline PET/CT scans.

Case 2

Four years previously, a 69-year-old man with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (Gleason score 5 + 4), a serum PSA level of 207 ng/mL, and a clinical stage of T3aN2M1b underwent maximum androgen blockade therapy as initial treatment. The PSA value increased and CRPC was diagnosed, and a new hormonal therapy (in order: enzalutamide, abiraterone, and enzalutamide) was introduced. However, the PSA value gradually increased to 18.7 ng/mL and he underwent a first 11C-choline PET/CT examination to evaluate his current disease status. 11C-choline PET/CT showed multiple osteoblastic lesions and abnormal 11C-choline uptake in the spine and pelvis, suggesting viable tumors (Fig. 2a). He received radium-223 therapy for 6 months; however, the PSA value gradually increased to 160 ng/mL and he underwent a second 11C-choline PET/CT examination to evaluate the effect of the radium-223 therapy. The second 11C-choline PET/CT at the end of the radium-223 therapy showed a decrease in existing 11C-choline uptake, but multiple new appearances of osteoblastic and nonosteoblastic lesions with abnormal 11C-choline uptake in the spine, pelvis, ribs, and femur, suggesting multiple viable bone metastases (Fig. 2b). We can assume progressive metabolic disease according to the two 11C-choline PET/CT scans.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

. A 69-year-old man with castration-resistant prostate cancer was treated with radium-223 therapy. a The first 11C-choline PET/CT showed multiple osteoblastic lesions and abnormal 11C-choline uptake in the spine and pelvis, suggesting viable tumors. b The second 11C-choline PET/CT at the end of the radium-223 therapy showed a decrease in existing 11C-choline uptake, but multiple new appearances of osteoblastic and nonosteoblastic lesions with abnormal 11C-choline uptake in the spine, pelvis, ribs, and femur, suggesting multiple viable bone metastases. We can assume progressive metabolic disease according to the two 11C-choline PET/CT scans.

Discussion

There are some problems in terms of evaluating bone lesions' characteristics in prostate cancer patients by using conventional serum and imaging evaluation techniques. For example, although PSA is the most widely used clinical biomarker of prostate cancer, a dissociation between PSA levels and state of disease may occur in CRPC patients [1]. CT and bone scintigraphy have been the most popular imaging methods for the evaluation of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Bone metastases in prostate carcinoma are osteoblastic in about 80% of cases, mixed osteoblastic and osteolytic in 15% of cases, and purely osteolytic lesions occasionally (5%) [2], and bone scintigraphy relies on the detection of osteoblastic activity. However, CT and bone scintigraphy have a limitation for evaluating metastases of prostate cancer, because both modalities are unable to discriminate viable osteoblastic bone metastases from treatment-induced sclerosis during the treatment course. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) regard bone scintigraphy as insufficient for an evaluation of tumor activity of bone metastases, and bone disease is judged as “nonmeasureable” by RECIST [3].

On the other hand, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer imaging group has positioned PET/CT using 11C-choline or 18C-fluorocholine as a potential first choice for monitoring the response of bone metastases to treatment in patients with prostate cancer [4]. As was clarified in our case series, choline PET/CT can determine the viability of bone metastases, regardless of whether sclerosis is present or not, and discriminate viable progressive osteoblastic bone metastasis from benign osteoblastic change induced by the treatment effect. In recent years, whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging [4, 5] and 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT [6] have emerged as new imaging modalities for monitoring the response of bone metastases to treatment in patients with prostate cancer.

Conclusions

Choline PET/CT is very useful to discriminate viable progressive osteoblastic bone metastasis from benign osteoblastic change induced by a treatment effect and to determine the viability of bone metastases, regardless of whether sclerosis is present or not. Choline PET/CT could assess the treatment response of bone metastases and enable us to design optimal treatment strategies for patients with metastatic CRPC.

Statement of Ethics

This report complies with the guidelines for human studies and includes evidence that the research was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant No. 19K08187.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: K.K., S.Y., and K.Y.; acquisition of data: S.Y., M.F., Y.K., Y.Y., S.N., K.S., T.H., M.T., and A.K.; drafting of the manuscript: K.K.; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: S.Y., A.K., and K.Y. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Collette L. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a surrogate end point for survival in prostate cancer clinical trials. Eur Urol. 2008;53((1)):6–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jorgens J. The radiographic characteristics of carcinoma of the prostate. Surg Clin North Am. 1965;45((6)):1427–40. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)37733-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45((2)):228–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lecouvet FE, Talbot JN, Messiou C, Bourguet P, Liu Y, de Souza NM, EORTC Imaging Group Monitoring the response of bone metastases to treatment with magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine techniques: a review and position statement by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer imaging group. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50((15)):2519–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Padhani AR, Lecouvet FE, Tunariu N, Koh DM, De Keyzer F, Collins DJ, et al. METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer: practical guidelines for acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of multiorgan involvement in advanced prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71((1)):81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grubmüller B, Rasul S, Baltzer P, Fajkovic H, D'Andrea D, Berndl F, et al. Response assessment using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2020;80((1)):74–82. doi: 10.1002/pros.23919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES