Abstract
Background
A small minority of people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) develop a severe illness, characterised by inflammation, microvascular damage and coagulopathy, potentially leading to myocardial injury, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial occlusive events. People with risk factors for or pre‐existing cardiovascular disease may be at greater risk.
Objectives
To assess the prevalence of pre‐existing cardiovascular comorbidities associated with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID‐19 in a variety of settings, including the community, care homes and hospitals. We also assessed the nature and rate of subsequent cardiovascular complications and clinical events in people with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19.
Search methods
We conducted an electronic search from December 2019 to 24 July 2020 in the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, covid‐19.cochrane.org, ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trial Register.
Selection criteria
We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies, controlled before‐and‐after, case‐control and cross‐sectional studies, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We analysed controlled trials as cohorts, disregarding treatment allocation. We only included peer‐reviewed studies with 100 or more participants, and excluded articles not written in English or only published in pre‐print servers.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently screened the search results and extracted data. Given substantial variation in study designs, reported outcomes and outcome metrics, we undertook a narrative synthesis of data, without conducting a meta‐analysis. We critically appraised all included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies and the JBI checklist for case series.
Main results
We included 220 studies. Most of the studies originated from China (47.7%) or the USA (20.9%); 9.5% were from Italy. A large proportion of the studies were retrospective (89.5%), but three (1.4%) were RCTs and 20 (9.1%) were prospective.
Using JBI’s critical appraisal checklist tool for prevalence studies, 75 studies attained a full score of 9, 57 studies a score of 8, 31 studies a score of 7, 5 studies a score of 6, three studies a score of 5 and one a score of 3; using JBI’s checklist tool for case series, 30 studies received a full score of 10, six studies a score of 9, 11 studies a score of 8, and one study a score of 5
We found that hypertension (189 studies, n = 174,414, weighted mean prevalence (WMP): 36.1%), diabetes (197 studies, n = 569,188, WMP: 22.1%) and ischaemic heart disease (94 studies, n = 100,765, WMP: 10.5%) are highly prevalent in people hospitalised with COVID‐19, and are associated with an increased risk of death. In those admitted to hospital, biomarkers of cardiac stress or injury are often abnormal, and the incidence of a wide range of cardiovascular complications is substantial, particularly arrhythmias (22 studies, n = 13,115, weighted mean incidence (WMI) 9.3%), heart failure (20 studies, n = 29,317, WMI: 6.8%) and thrombotic complications (VTE: 16 studies, n = 7700, WMI: 7.4%).
Authors' conclusions
This systematic literature review indicates that cardiometabolic comorbidities are common in people who are hospitalised with a COVID‐19 infection, and cardiovascular complications are frequent. We plan to update this review and to conduct a formal meta‐analysis of outcomes based on a more homogeneous selected subsample of high‐certainty studies.
Keywords: Humans; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology; Comorbidity; COVID-19; COVID-19/epidemiology; COVID-19/mortality; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology; Heart Failure; Heart Failure/epidemiology; Hospitalization; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data; Hypertension; Hypertension/epidemiology; Incidence; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology; Obesity; Obesity/epidemiology; Prevalence; Thrombosis; Thrombosis/epidemiology
Plain language summary
What type of heart and blood vessel problems complicate COVID‐19 infections, how common are they and what other medical conditions do these patients have?
Background
Many people infected by COVID‐19 have few or no symptoms. However, COVID‐19 can make the blood ‘sticky’, clogging up both small blood vessels (capillaries) and large ones, which may cause heart attacks, strokes or blood clots in the legs or lungs. These can be fatal. People who have diabetes, high blood pressure or pre‐existing heart problems are at greater risk of developing such complications if they get COVID‐19.
Our research question
We wanted to find out, in cases of confirmed or suspected COVID‐19:
‐ what are the most common pre‐existing heart and blood vessel (cardiovascular) problems (for example, diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity)
‐ what are the most common complications affecting the heart and blood vessels (for example, irregular heartbeat, blood clots, heart failure and stroke) in different setting (in the community, care homes or in hospital).
What we did
We searched for published studies that reported heart and blood vessel problems in people with possible or confirmed COVID‐19. Studies could be of any design and could take place anywhere, but they had to have been checked by other researchers (be peer‐reviewed), be written in English, and include at least 100 cases.
The evidence is current until July 2020.
What we found
We found 220 studies that reported relevant information, but the quality of the information was often poor. Studies were mostly from China and the USA. Most studies only had information on the small minority of cases that were admitted to hospital with COVID‐19, often to the intensive care unit.
We found that high blood pressure, diabetes and heart disease are very common in people hospitalised with COVID‐19 and are associated with an increased risk of death. More than one‐third of patients with COVID‐19 had a history of high blood pressure, 23.5% had a pre‐existing heart or blood vessel problem, 22.1% had diabetes, and 21.6% were obese (many people had more than one of these conditions).
The most common cardiovascular complication in people with COVID‐19 was an irregular heartbeat (atrial fibrillation; 8.5%). Blood clots in the legs (6.1%) or lungs (4.3%), and heart failure (6.8%) were also common, but the reported rates may be underestimated because the studies did not always carry out appropriate investigations. Heart attacks (1.7%) and strokes (1.2%) were reported less often. Blood tests also often suggested heart damage or stress.
Next steps
The studies focused on people in hospital, with severe COVID‐19, so the results may not apply to people who had milder COVID‐19 who were not hospitalised. The studies were very different from each other and did not always report the results in the same way or use the most reliable methods. Accordingly, our confidence in the precision of the prevalence of pre‐existing disease and of cardiovascular complications is not high.
We plan to update this review. However, in future, we will focus only on higher‐quality evidence to increase the strength of our findings.
Background
Many people infected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), also known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), will have few or no symptoms, but others will develop a severe illness, characterised by widespread inflammation, microvascular damage and coagulopathy (1). The risk of cardiovascular complications is higher in men and in people who have predisposing conditions, such as older age, hypertension, obesity, diabetes and atherosclerosis, which are associated with endothelial dysfunction (2, 3). Inflammation, thrombosis and microvascular obstruction may lead to multi‐organ dysfunction, including myocardial injury in both the presence and the absence of atherosclerotic epicardial coronary disease. The cardiovascular presentations of COVID‐19 infection are diverse and include thrombosis (arterial, venous and pulmonary), arrhythmias (atrial and ventricular), heart failure and shock. Cardiovascular complications are associated with a high mortality (2‐4).
Objectives
To assess:
The prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities of suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 in a variety of settings, including the community, care homes and hospitals
The nature and rate of cardiovascular complications and clinical events in people with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19.
Methods
We reported this systematic review in accordance with the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) Statement (5, 256).
Types of studies
We included a range of study designs, including prospective and retrospective cohort studies, controlled before‐and‐after, case‐control and cross‐sectional studies, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with individual or cluster allocation. We analysed controlled trials as cohorts, disregarding treatment allocation. We only included studies with 100 participants or more.
Excluded studies were
Not written in English
Not original research (e.g. reviews, editorials and letters)
Theses, book chapters or conference abstracts
Animal or laboratory studies, not carried out in a clinical setting
Purely epidemiological reports (i.e. only demographics and mortality rate, with no clinical characteristics)
Case reports and series describing cardiovascular complications
Pre‐print reports (i.e. without or prior to peer review)
Types of participants
People with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 in any setting.
Types of outcome measures
Outcomes of interest are restricted to cardiovascular complications and clinical events:
Arterial
Myocardial Infarction or acute coronary syndrome
Stroke
Peripheral arterial occlusion (including loss of viability of appendages and amputation).
Venous
Deep venous thrombosis
Pulmonary thrombo‐embolism
Arrhythmias
Supra‐ventricular (including atrial fibrillation)
Sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, or both
Atrioventricular block
Circulatory failure
Shock
Ultrafiltration or new onset of dialysis, or both
Myocarditis
Any mention
Biomarkers
Raised troponin (above upper reference limit)
Raised natriuretic peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP)
Impaired left ventricular systolic function
Impaired right ventricular systolic function
QT prolongation
Death
All‐cause
Electronic searches
We searched the following electronic databases on 24 July 2020:
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (Issue 7 of 12, 2020)
Epub Ahead of Print, In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to July 22, 2020)
Embase (Ovid, 1980 to 2020 week 29)
A Cochrane Information Specialist drafted a preliminary search strategy for MEDLINE, informed by a content expert and independently peer‐reviewed. We then adapted this for the other databases. The search strategies are in Appendix 1. The searches were run with a date limit from 2019, when COVID‐19 emerged.
Searching other resources
We also searched the following trials registers for ongoing or unpublished trials on 24 July 2020:
Cochrane COVID‐19 Study Register (covid‐19.cochrane.org)
ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov)
EU Clinical Trial Register (clinicaltrialsregister.eu)
Selection of studies
We uploaded all articles retrieved to a reference management database (Covidence) and removed duplicate references.
Two review authors independently conducted screening in two stages; first by title and abstracts, then by full texts. Due to the large number of papers, five authors (KSL, PP, GD, CW, KM) independently reviewed titles and abstracts to determine their eligibility. A second review author checked all excluded records. We resolved any disagreements through discussion amongst review authors or through adjudication by a third review author.
Data extraction and management
Four review authors (KSL, GD, CW, KM) independently extracted and collected study characteristics and information from included studies on to a data‐collection template. An independent review author (PP) double‐checked for accuracy. We resolved discrepancies by consensus or escalated disagreements to an additional review author.
Where available, we collected the following data:
Study design, size and country where the research was conducted;
Setting: home/community, residential care, hospital admissions or intensive care unit (ICU);
Participant baseline characteristics, including age, sex, ethnicity, smoking history, co‐morbidities (such as hypertension, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease (IHD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), heart valve disease, congenital heart disease, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, chronic kidney disease (CKD), cancer, obesity), body mass index, cardiac implantable electrical devices (pacemakers or defibrillators);
Signs and severity: heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, temperature, respiratory support required, partial pressure of oxygen (pO2);
Biomarkers: NT‐proBNP, BNP, troponin, hsCRP (or CRP), D‐dimer, creatinine (or eGFR);
Echocardiography/electrocardiography (ECG) information (i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QT);
Medications such as ACE‐I, ARB, ARNI, MRA, beta‐blockers, aspirin, oral anticoagulants, P2Y12 inhibitors, statin, diuretic (any, thiazide, loop diuretic).
Assessment of risk of bias and quality in included studies
Four review authors (KSL, GD, CW, and KM) independently assessed the quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies (6) and the JBI checklist for case series, respectively. In summary, these tools rate the quality of selection, measurement and comparability of studies and give a score for prevalence studies (maximum of 9) and case series (maximum of 10).
Data synthesis
We tabulated outcome results from each study in detail, to enable inspection and assessment of the potential patterns within the data. Given substantial variation in study designs, reported outcomes and outcome metrics, we undertook a narrative synthesis of data, deeming formal quantitative meta‐analyses inappropriate. We obtained the weighted mean by adding all the prevalent or incident cases for each study, divided by the total number of the participants included in those cohorts.
Results
Study characteristics
After removing duplicates, we identified 5464 abstracts, of which we assessed 461 as full‐text articles for eligibility. We excluded 241 of these, leaving 220 unique publications to be included in our review (Table 1; Table 2; Figure 1) (7‐226). Most of the studies originated from China (47.7%) or the USA (20.9%); 9.5% were from Italy. A large proportion of the studies were retrospective (89.5%), but three (1.4%) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 (9.1%) were prospective.
1. Prevalence of comorbidities and incidence of cardiovascular events.
| Outcomes | ||||||
| | Studies not providing data | Populationa | Studies providing datab | Population | Weighted mean | Range |
| Prevalence of comorbidities | ||||||
| Hypertension | 31 | 403,873 | 189 | 174,414 | 36.1% | 4.5% to 100% |
| Obesity | 175 | 492,430 | 45 | 85,857 | 21.6% | 0.2% to 57.6% |
| Diabetes | 23 | 9,099 | 197 | 569,188 | 22.1% | 0.0% to 100% |
| IHD | 126 | 477,522 | 94 | 100,765 | 10.5% | 1.0% to 28.2% |
| CVD | 118 | 117,191 | 102 | 461,096 | 23.5% | 0.7% to 68.7% |
| Heart failure | 166 | 493,386 | 54 | 84,391 | 6.5% | 0.0% to 28.0% |
| CVA | 142 | 510,271 | 78 | 68,016 | 5.1% | 0.5% to 19.6% |
| AF | 194 | 555,913 | 26 | 22,374 | 11.1% | 1.0% to 22.8% |
| Valve disease | 215 | 576,030 | 5 | 2257 | 3.7% | 1.8% to 6.8% |
| Incidence of cardiovascular events | ||||||
| MI/ACS | 204 | 1,597,182 | 16 | 14,273 | 1.7% | 0.0% to 3.6% |
| Stroke | 200 | 1,588,720 | 20 | 22,735 | 1.2% | 0.0% to 9.6% |
| Heart failure | 200 | 1,582,138 | 20 | 29,317 | 6.8% | 0.0% to 24.0% |
| VTE | 204 | 1,603,755 | 16 | 7700 | 7.4% | 0.0% to 46.2% |
| DVT | 205 | 1,605,127 | 15 | 6328 | 6.1% | 0.0% to 46.2% |
| PE | 202 | 1,604,122 | 18 | 7333 | 4.3% | 0.0% to 23.8% |
| Coagulopathy | 203 | 1,595,440 | 17 | 16,015 | 8.0% | 0.5% to 38.0% |
| Arrhythmia | 198 | 1,598,340 | 22 | 13,115 | 9.3% | 0.0% to 30.3% |
| Supra‐ventricular | 210 | 1,605,496 | 10 | 5959 | 8.5% | 0.0% to 24.7% |
| Ventricular | 200 | 1,596,365 | 20 | 15,090 | 2.7% | 0.0% to 12.4% |
| AV‐block | 217 | 1,609,826 | 3 | 1629 | 1.3% | 0.0% to 2.6% |
| Prolonging QT | 210 | 1,607,466 | 10 | 3989 | 7.6% | 0.0% to 20.0% |
| Incidence of cardiovascular events (cohorts enrolled predominantly in ICU) | ||||||
| Shock | 181 | 1,591,125 | 39 | 20,330 | 17.1% | 0.2% to 67.0% |
| Vasopressor support | 200 | 1,590,068 | 20 | 21,387 | 20.9% | 3.0% to 71.0% |
| Shock or vasopressor support | 168 | 1,573,543 | 52 | 37,912 | 18.0% | 0.2% to 71.0% |
| RRT | 173 | 1,572,302 | 47 | 39,153 | 5.1% | 0.0% to 50.0% |
| ECMO | 170 | 1,572,984 | 50 | 38,471 | 1.1% | 0.0% to 8.1% |
| Incidence of cardiovascular events based on cardiac biomarkers and imaging | ||||||
| Myocarditis | 216 | 1,608,769 | 4 | 2686 | 2.6% | 0.0% to 12.5% |
| Cardiac injury | 173 | 1,583,677 | 47 | 27,778 | 27.6% | 0.6% to 100% |
| LV dysfunction | 215 | 1,610,785 | 5 | 670 | 13% | 4.0% to 30.0% |
| RV dysfunction | 216 | 1,610,910 | 4 | 545 | 14.2% | 3.6% to 25.0% |
| All‐cause mortality | ||||||
| All studies | 15 | 7822 | 205 | 1,603,633 | 6.1% | 0.0% to 100% |
| ICU cohorts only | NA | 12 | 6076 | 32.0% | 8.7% to 72% | |
aA large study (n = 1,320,488) reported comorbidities only for a subset of participants (n = 287,320). bincludes studies reporting zero events. Abbreviations used: ACS – Acute coronary syndrome; AF – atrial fibrillation; AV – atrioventricular; CVD – cardiovascular disease; CVA – cerebrovascular accident; DVT – deep vein thrombosis; ECMO – extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ; ICU – intensive care unit; IHD – ischaemic heart disease; LV – left ventricular; MI – myocardial infarction; PE – pulmonary embolism; RRT ‐ renal replacement therapy; RV – right ventricular; VTE – venous thromboembolism;
2. Key findings of the 220 studies included in the review.
| Author | Setting | Country | Participants (No.) | Men (%) | Key findings |
| Randomised controlled trials (in order of size) | |||||
| Wang (7) | H: 100% | China | 236 | 59 |
|
| Cao (8) | H: 100% | China | 199 | 60 |
|
| Deftereos (9) | H: 100% | Greece | 105 | 58 |
|
| Prospective studies (in order of size) | |||||
| Petrilli (10) | H: 51.9% ICU: 18.7% |
USA | 5279 | 49.5 |
|
| Cen (11) | H: 100% | China | 1007 | 49 |
|
| Lee (12) | H: 88% ICU: 7% |
UK | 800 | 56 |
|
| Wendel Garcia (13) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
Europe | 639 | 75 |
|
| Ciceri (14) | H: 100% ICU: 17% |
Italy | 410 | 73 |
|
| Saluja (15) | H: 100% ICU: 1.9% |
India | 406 | 65 |
|
| Ortiz‐Brizuela (16) | H: 45% ICU: 9.3% |
Mexico | 309 | 59 |
|
| Cummings (17) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
USA | 257 | 67 |
|
| Saleh (18) | H: 100% | USA | 201 | 57 |
|
| Garassino (19) | H: 76% ICU: 7% |
8 countries | 200 | 70 |
|
| Rieder (20) | H: 100% ICU: 9.5% |
Germany | 190 | 53 |
|
| Du (21) | H: 100% | China | 179 | 54 |
|
| Dubois‐Silva (22) | H: 100% | Spain | 171 | NR |
|
| Demelo‐Rodríguez (23) | H: 100% ICU: 10.2% |
Spain | 156 | 65 |
|
| Helms (24) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
France | 150 | 81 |
|
| Zhang (25) | H: 100% ICU: 10.5% |
China | 143 | 52 |
|
| Rath (26) | H: 100% ICU: 45% |
Germany | 123 | 63 |
|
| Moschini (27) | H: 100% | Italy | 113 | 75 |
|
| Wei (28) | H: 100% ICU: 30% |
China | 101 | 54 |
|
| Toniati (29) | H: 100% ICU: 43% |
Italy | 100 | 88 |
|
| Retrospective studies (in order of size) | |||||
| Stokes (30) | H: 14% ICU: 2.3% |
USA | 1,320,488 | 51 |
|
| Ellington (31) | H: 8.1% ICU: 0.95% |
USA | 91,412 | 0 |
|
| Kammar‐García (32) | H: 38% ICU: 4.4% |
Mexico | 13,842 | 58 |
|
| Soares (33) | H: 10.8% Community: 89.2% |
Brazil | 10,713 | 45 |
|
| Annie (34) | H: 33.2% | USA (36%) Worldwide |
9358 | 40 |
|
| Kuno (35) | H: 54% | USA | 8438 | 54 |
|
| Mikami (36) | H: 57% OP: 43% |
USA | 6493 | 54 |
|
| Qin (37) | H: 100% | China | 6033 | 47 |
|
| Richardson (38) | H: 100% ICU: 6.5% |
USA | 5700 | 60 |
|
| Hirsch (39) | H: 100% ICU: 25.6% |
USA | 5549 | 61 |
|
| Jung (40) | H: 38% | Korea | 5179 | 44 |
|
| Fosbøl (41) | H: 49.6% | Denmark | 4480 | 48 |
|
| Price‐Haywood (42) | H: 39.7% ICU: 13.6% |
USA | 3481 | 40 |
|
| Chen (43) | H: 100% ICU: 31% |
China | 3309 | 50 |
|
| Palmieri (44) | H: 100% | Italy | 3032 | 77 |
|
| Rastad (45) | H: 100% | Iran | 2957 | 54 |
|
| Gao (46) | H: 100% | China | 2877 | 51 |
|
| Lala (47) | H: 100% | USA | 2736 | 59.6 |
|
| Kim (48) | H: 100% ICU: 32% |
USA | 2491 | 53 |
|
| Phipps (49) | H: 95% ICU: 23% |
USA | 2273 | 57 |
|
| Borobia (50) | H: 100% ICU: 10.6% |
Spain | 2226 | 48 |
|
| Gupta (51) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
USA | 2215 | 65 |
|
| Sousa (52) | H: 11.4% ICU: 5.4% |
Brazil | 2070 | 49 |
|
| Wu (53) | H: 100% ICU: 16.8% |
China | 2041 | 49 |
|
| Merkler (54) | H: 100% ICU: 24.7% |
USA | 1916 | 57 |
|
| Qin (55) | H: 100% | China | 1875 | 50 |
|
| Mehta (56) | H: 24% ICU: 9.3% |
USA | 1735 | 50 |
|
| Hernández‐Fernández (57) | H: 100% | Spain | 1683 | NR |
|
| Bravi (58) | H: 41% ICU: 11.9% Community: 59% |
Italy | 1603 | 47 |
|
| Iaccarino (59) | H: 100% | Italy | 1591 | 64 |
|
| Grasselli (60) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
Italy | 1591 | 82 |
|
| Guan (61) | H: 100% ICU: 6.2% |
China | 1590 | 57 |
|
| Alsofayan (62) | H: 71.6% ICU: 4.7% |
Saudi Arabia | 1519 | 54 |
|
| Rosenberg (63) | H: 100% ICU: 22.8% |
USA | 1438 | 60 |
|
| Cantador (64) | H: 100% | Spain | 1419 | 79 |
|
| Cariou (65) | H: 100% ICU: 31% |
France | 1317 | 65 |
|
| Imam (66) | H: 100% ICU: 26% |
USA | 1305 | 54 |
|
| Fauvel (67) | H: 100% ICU: 15% |
France | 1240 | 58 |
|
| Bean (68) | H: 100% ICU: 30% |
UK | 1200 | 57 |
|
| Li (69) | H: 100% | China | 1178 | 46 |
|
| Chougar (70) | H: 100% | France | 1176 | 66 |
|
| Galloway (71) | H: 100% ICU: 13.5% |
UK | 1157 | 58 |
|
| De Abajo (72) | H: 100% ICU: 9.7% |
Spain | 1139 | 61 |
|
| Zhang (73) | H: 100% | China | 1128 | 54 |
|
| Luo (74) | H: 100% | China | 1115 | 50 |
|
| Million (75) | H: 14% | France | 1061 | 46 |
|
| Wang (76) | H: 100% | China | 1012 | 52 |
|
| Zhao (77) | H: 100% ICU: 6% |
China | 1000 | 47 |
|
| Argenziano (78) | H: 61% ICU: 23% |
USA | 1000 | 60 |
|
| Pan (79) | H: 100% ICU: 6.3% |
China | 996 | 47 |
|
| López‐Otero (80) | H: 24.2% ICU: 3.4% |
Spain | 985 | 44 |
|
| Xiong (81) | H: 100% | China | 917 | 55 |
|
| Chen (82) | H: 100% | China | 904 | 47 |
|
| Hu (83) | H: 100% ICU: 4.6% |
China | 884 | 51 |
|
| Ye (84) | H: 100% ICU: 3.7% |
China | 856 | 51 |
|
| Rothstein (85) | H: 100% | USA | 844 | 48 |
|
| Albitar (86) | NR | Worldwide | 828 | 59 |
|
| Lian (87) | H: 100% ICU: 2.7% |
China | 788 | 52 |
|
| Hajifathalian (88) | H: 100% ICU: 25% |
USA | 770 | 61 |
|
| Shao (89) | H: 100% | China | 761 | 66 |
|
| Uribarri (90) | H: 100% | Worldwide | 758 | 59 |
|
| McCullough (91) | H: 100% | USA | 756 | 63 |
|
| Tian (92) | H: 100% | China | 751 | 50 |
|
| Lorente‐Ros (93) | H: 100% ICU: 7.6% |
Spain | 707 | 63 |
|
| Bhatla (94) | H: 100% ICU: 11% |
USA | 700 | 45 |
|
| Nie (95) | H: 98% ICU: 2% |
China | 671 | 56 |
|
| Shi (96) | H: 100% | China | 671 | 48 |
|
| Zhang (97) | H: 100% ICU: < 1% |
China | 645 | 51 |
|
| Şenkal (98) | H: 100% ICU: 7% |
Turkey | 611 | 59 |
|
| Barman (99) | H: 100% ICU: 32% |
Turkey | 607 | 55 |
|
| Wang (100) | H: 100% | China | 605 | 53 |
|
| Gianfrancesco (101) | H: 46% | Worldwide | 600 | 29 |
|
| Shang (102) | H: 100% ICU: 6.5% |
China | 584 | 47 |
|
| Li (103) | H: 100% | China | 548 | 51 |
|
| Zhang (104) | H: 100% ICU: 13.8% |
China | 541 | 47 |
|
| San Román (105) | H: 100% | Spain | 522 | 56 |
|
| Bhandari (106) | H: 100% | India | 522 | 61 |
|
| Lian (107) | H: 100% ICU: 1% |
China | 465 | 52 |
|
| Suleyman (108) | H: 76.7% ICU: 39.7% |
USA | 463 | 44 |
|
| Yang (109) | H: 100% ICU: 9.7% |
China | 462 | 45 |
|
| Jain (110) | H: 100% ICU: 41% |
USA | 459 | 57 |
|
| Brill (111) | H: 100% | UK | 450 | 60 |
|
| Xiao (112) | H: 100% | China | 442 | 50 |
|
| Aloisio (113) | H: 100% ICU: 11% |
Italy | 427 | 69 |
|
| Shi (114) | H: 100% | China | 416 | 49 |
|
| Gayam (115) | H: 100% ICU: 29% |
USA | 408 | 57 |
|
| Al‐Samkari (116) | H: 100% ICU: 36% |
USA | 400 | 57 |
|
| Patell (117) | H: 100% ICU: 51% |
USA | 398 | 53 |
|
| Sinkeler (118) | H: 100% | Netherlands | 397 | 66 |
|
| Goyal (119) | H: 100% | USA | 393 | 61 |
|
| Lodigiani (120) | H: 100% ICU: 16% |
Italy | 388 | 68 |
|
| Liao (121) | H: 100% ICU: 23% |
China | 380 | 54 |
|
| Myers (122) | H: 100% ICU: 30% |
USA | 377 | 56 |
|
| Hashemi (123) | H: 100% ICU: 36% |
USA | 363 | 55 |
|
| Huang (124) | H: 100% | China | 344 | 55 |
|
| Wang (125) | H: 100% | Germany | 339 | 49 |
|
| Toussie (126) | H: 43% | USA | 338 | 62 |
|
| Ferrante (127) | H: 100% ICU: 22% |
Italy | 332 | 71 |
|
| Hu (128) | H: 100% | China | 323 | 51 |
|
| Biagi (129) | H: 100% | Italy | 320 | 72 |
|
| Violi (130) | H: 100% | Italy | 319 | 60 |
|
| Li (131) | H: 100% | China | 312 | 60 |
|
| Nie (132) | H: 100% | China | 311 | 61 |
|
| Huang (133) | H: 100% ICU: 16.5% |
China | 310 | 56 |
|
| Shi (134) | H: 100% ICU: 12.8% |
China | 306 | 49 |
|
| Ayanian (135) | H: 100% ICU: 23% |
USA | 299 | 54 |
|
| Wang (136) | H: 100% | China | 296 | 47 |
|
| Wu (137) | H: 100% ICU: 30% |
China | 280 | 54 |
|
| Chen (138) | H: 100% | China | 274 | 62 |
|
| Han (139) | H: 100% | China | 273 | 36 |
|
| Deng (140) | H: 100% | China | 264 | 49 |
|
| Okoh (141) | H: 100% ICU: 33% |
USA | 251 | 51 |
|
| Yao (142) | H: 100% | China | 248 | 54 |
|
| Xu (143) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
China | 239 | 60 |
|
| Cecconi (144) | H: 100% ICU: 17% |
Italy | 239 | 71 |
|
| Alkundi (145) | H: 100% | UK | 232 | 63 |
|
| Masetti (146) | H: 100% ICU: 2.6% |
Italy | 229 | 65 |
|
| Yang (147) | H: 100% | China | 226 | 50 |
|
| Yu (148) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
China | 226 | 61 |
|
| Obata (149) | H: 100% ICU: 24% |
USA | 225 | 57 |
|
| Li (150) | H: 100% | China | 225 | 53 |
|
| Deng (151) | H: 100% | China | 225 | 55 |
|
| Pelayo (152) | H: 100% | USA | 223 | 52 |
|
| Güner (153) | H: 100% ICU: 18.9% |
Turkey | 222 | 60 |
|
| Zhang (154) | H: 100% ICU: 19.9% |
China | 221 | 49 |
|
| Li (155) | H: 100% | China | 219 | 41 |
|
| Mao (156) | H: 100% | China | 214 | 41 |
|
| Yang (157) | H: 100% | China | 212 | 51 |
|
| Gao (158) | H: 100% ICU: 9% |
China | 210 | 48 |
|
| Li (159) | H: 100% | China | 204 | 49 |
|
| Wu (160) | H: 100% ICU: 26.4% |
China | 201 | 64 |
|
| Pagnesi (161) | H: 100% ICU: 3.5% |
Italy | 200 | 66 |
|
| Yang (162) | H: 100% ICU: 14.5% |
China | 200 | 49 |
|
| Middeldorp (163) | H: 100% ICU: 38% |
Netherlands | 198 | 66 |
|
| Yan (164) | H: 100% ICU: 47.7% |
China | 193 | 59 |
|
| Russo (165) | H:100% | Italy | 192 | 60 |
|
| Zhou (166) | H: 100% ICU: 26% |
China | 191 | 62 |
|
| Guo (167) | H: 100% | China | 187 | 49 |
|
| Klok (168) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
Nethetherlands | 184 | 76 |
|
| Ni (169) | H: 100% | China | 176 | 57 |
|
| Chen (170) | H: 100% ICU: 2% |
China | 175 | 50 |
|
| Guo (171) | H: 100% | China | 174 | 44 |
|
| Mahévas (172) | H: 100% | France | 173 | 72 |
|
| Si (173) | H: 100% | China | 170 | 55 |
|
| Zhang (174) | H: 100% ICU: 4.2% |
China | 166 | 51 |
|
| Itelman (175) | H: 100% ICU:14.8% |
Israel | 162 | 65 |
|
| Shi (176) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
China | 161 | 65 |
|
| Lim (177) | H: 100% | South Korea | 160 | 54 |
|
| Andrikopoulou (178) | H: 55% ICU: 6% OP: 45% |
USA | 158 | 0 |
|
| Zou (179) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
China | 154 | 44 |
|
| Ren (180) | H: 100% | China | 151 | 52 |
|
| Ruan (181) | H: 100% ICU: 29% |
China | 150 | 68 |
|
| Oussalah (182) | H: 100% | France | 149 | 61 |
|
| Chen (183) | H: 100% ICU: 0.7% |
China | 145 | 55 |
|
| Bonetti (184) | H: 100% | Italy | 144 | 67 |
|
| Xie (185) | H: 100% | China | 140 | 51 |
|
| Gavin (186) | H: 100% | USA | 140 | 51 |
|
| Wang (187) | H: 100% ICU: 26% |
China | 138 | 54 |
|
| Liu (188) | H: 100% | China | 137 | 45 |
|
| Yang (189) | H: 100% ICU: 24% |
China | 136 | 49 |
|
| Zhang (190) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
China | 136 | 63 |
|
| Koleilat (191) | H: 100% | USA | 135 | 54 |
|
| Wan (192) | H: 100% ICU: 29.6% |
China | 135 | 53 |
|
| Li (193) | H: 100% ICU: 14.4% |
China | 132 | 53 |
|
| Sala (194) | H: 100% | Italy | 132 | 66 |
|
| Wang (195) | H: 100% | China | 132 | 52 |
|
| Xiong (196) | H: 100% | China | 131 | 57 |
|
| Wu (197) | H: 100% | China | 125 | 53 |
|
| Churchill (198) | H: 100% ICU: 69% |
USA | 125 | 60 |
|
| Pan (199) | H: 100% ICU: 73% |
China | 124 | 68 |
|
| Simonnet (200) | H: 100% ICU: 100% |
France | 124 | 73 |
|
| Luan (201) | H: 100% ICU: 30% |
China | 117 | 53 |
|
| Yang (202) | H: 100% | China | 114 | 49 |
|
| Shang (203) | H: 100% | China | 113 | 65 |
|
| Selçuk (204) | H: 100% ICU: 39% |
Turkey | 113 | 52 |
|
| Deng (205) | H: 100% ICU: 23% |
China | 112 | 51 |
|
| Zhang (206) | H: 100% ICU: 16.2% |
China | 111 | 45 |
|
| Quartuccio (207) | H: 100% ICU: 24% |
Italy | 111 | 69 |
|
| Sud (208) | H: 100% ICU: 30% |
USA | 110 | 64 |
|
| Zhou (209) | H: 100% | China | 110 | 55 |
|
| Du (210) | H: 100% ICU: 46.8% |
China | 109 | 68 |
|
| Yao (211) | H: 100% ICU: 16% |
China | 108 | 40 |
|
| Escalera‐Antezana (212) | H: 13.1% ICU: 3.7% |
Bolivia | 107 | 51 |
|
| Wang (213) | H: 100% | China | 107 | 53 |
|
| Argulian (214) | H: 100% | USA | 105 | 64 |
|
| Hsia (215) | H: 100% | USA | 105 | 58 |
|
| Zou (216) | H: 100% | China | 105 | 53 |
|
| Buckner (217) | H: 100% | USA | 105 | 50 |
|
| Xie (218) | H: 100% | China | 105 | 51 |
|
| Marone (219) | H: 100% | Italy | 105 | NR |
|
| Guo (220) | H: 100% | China | 105 | 46 |
|
| Hu (221) | H: 100% | China | 105 | 59 |
|
| Hwang (222) | H: 100% ICU: 25% |
China | 103 | 50 |
|
| Zhu (223) | H: 100% | China | 102 | 58 |
|
| Wu (224) | H: 100% ICU: 4% |
China | 101 | 54 |
|
| Duanmu (225) | H: 24% ICU: 6% |
USA | 100 | 56 |
|
| Moriconi (226) | H: 100% | Italy | 100 | 52 |
|
Abbreviations used: H‐ hospital; OP – Outpatient; IP – inpatients; ICU – intensive care; CKD – chronic kidney disease; IHD – ischaemic heart disease; h/o ‐ history of; HTN – hypertension; T2DM – type 2 diabetes mellitus; HF – heart failure; CVD – cardiovascular disease; NR – not reported; MI – myocardial infarction; AF – atrial fibrillation; RCT – randomised controlled trial; ECMO ‐ Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Trop – Troponin; HsT‐I – High sensitivity troponin‐I; LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction; RVEF – right ventricular ejection fraction; Y – years; VTE – venous thromboembolism; PE: pulmonary embolism; DVT ‐ deep vein thrombosis; TdP ‐ torsades de pointes; PEA ‐ pulseless electrical activity; SR‐ sinus rhythm; CVA ‐ Cerebrovascular accident; AKI – acute kidney injury, SCD – sudden cardiac death.
1.

Using JBI’s critical appraisal checklist tool for prevalence studies,75 studies attained a full score of 9, 57 studies a score of 8, 31 studies a score of 7, five studies a score of 6, three studies a score of 5 and one a score of 3. Using JBI’s checklist tool for case series, 30 studies received a full score of 10, six studies a score of 9, 11 studies a score of 8, and one study a score of 5.
Demographics and cardiovascular comorbidities
The mean or median age of participants included in these studies ranged from ~ 30 to 78 years. Most studies enrolled participants who had been hospitalised. There was a slight predominance of men when participants were enrolled from medical wards, but the proportion increased when participants were enrolled from intensive care units (ICUs). Two studies recruited only women of reproductive age. The weighted mean prevalence (WMP) of pre‐existing cardiovascular disease was 23.5% amongst 102 studies that reported this co‐morbidity, although the definition of what cardiovascular disease comprised (e.g. hypertension, ischaemic heart disease) was often unclear (Table 1). Hypertension (WMP: 36.1%), type II diabetes (WMP: 22.1%) and ischaemic heart disease (WMP: 10.5%) were commonly‐reported cardiovascular comorbidities, and their prevalence increased with age.
Amongst 1,320,488 COVID‐19 cases reported in the USA by 30 May 2020 and analysed by the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP), the median age was 48 years (30). The incidence of COVID‐19 was similar for women and men. Men were more likely than women to be hospitalised (16% versus 12%) or admitted to ICU (3% versus 2%) in the CDCP report. Amongst 287,320 cases reported by CDCP that had information on underlying health conditions, cardiovascular disease (32%) and diabetes (30%) were the most common. The prevalence of CVD was 20.2% in those aged 40 to 49 years, increasing to 60.6% amongst those older than 80 years. The prevalence of diabetes was highest amongst those aged 60 to 79 years (46%).
Obesity (WMP: 21.6%) was common (exceeding 57%) in studies originating from the USA, but was rarely reported in studies from China. Fifty‐four studies reported prevalent heart failure (WMP 6.5%). Valve disease was reported less frequently (WMP 3.7%; five studies only).
Cardiovascular complications of COVID‐19
Information on the incidence of cardiovascular events was derived almost exclusively from the small proportion of participants infected with COVID‐19 who were admitted to hospital. However, there are case reports of acute (fatal) cardiovascular events in the community associated with symptoms of COVID‐19 (227). Population‐based studies have suggested that fewer people have presented to hospital with acute cardiovascular events during this pandemic; it is unclear whether this reflects a reduction in events, perhaps due to changes in behaviours and lifestyle, or avoidance of seeking medical attention (228). Some publications have described an increase in sudden deaths in the community during the pandemic; presumably very few of these cases coincided with COVID‐19 infection (229).
Arterial events
In 16 studies, the WMI of myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome in people hospitalised with COVID‐19 was 1.7% (range 0% to 3.6%). In 20 studies, the WMI for stroke was 1.2% (range 0% to 9.6%). In a cohort of 219 people hospitalised with COVID‐19, 11 (6 men) developed ischaemic (4.6%) or haemorrhagic (0.5%) stroke; their mortality was substantial (54%) (155). In a retrospective study conducted in 844 participants with COVID‐19 in the USA, 2.4% had ischaemic stroke and 0.9% an intracranial haemorrhage (85). Amongst 9358 participants with COVID‐19 aged under 50 years admitted in different healthcare organisations worldwide (36% in USA), 64 (0.7%) had a stroke. In this study, participants who developed a stroke were more likely to have hypertension (61% versus 12%), diabetes (33% versus 6.5%), obesity (47% versus 17%) and heart failure (16% versus 1.5%) and were also more likely to die (15.6% versus 0.6%) (34). Other peripheral arterial thrombotic complications, such as acute limb or mesenteric ischaemia, were rarely reported (24).
Venous complications
For people hospitalised with COVID‐19, the WMI for venous thromboembolism in 16 studies was 7.4% (range 0% to 46.2%) with the WMI of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) being rather similar (6.1% and 4.3%, respectively). In a cross‐sectional study conducted in China, 143 participants admitted with COVID‐19 were screened for DVT using compression venous ultrasound; DVT was identified in 46%, but only one participant was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (25). People with DVT were more likely to be older, had higher D‐dimer and high‐sensitivity troponin levels, and a worse prognosis. In a prospective study conducted in 156 participants with COVID‐19 and elevated D‐dimer (> 1000 ng/mL), Demelo‐Rodríguez and colleagues identified asymptomatic DVT in 14.7% participants (23).
A prospective study that enrolled 150 consecutive patients admitted in four ICUs in France showed a high incidence (25%) of pulmonary embolism in 99 of those who underwent a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) (24). Of 184 participants with severe COVID‐19 admitted to an ICU in the Netherlands, 14% developed a PE; stroke and venous peripheral thrombotic events were less frequent (1.6% for both) (168). Of 1240 participants with COVID‐19 who underwent CTPA in 24 French hospitals, 8.3% had a PE (67). Participants with PE were more likely to be men, less likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation or stroke, less likely to receive treatment with anticoagulants, and had higher D‐dimer levels. Those who developed PE were more likely to be transferred to ICU (31% versus 14%). However, in this study, the incidence of PE was not associated with greater mortality. Lower rates of PE (from 0.7% to 6.6%) have been reported in other studies.
Arrhythmias and other ECG abnormalities
Atrial fibrillation was a common comorbidity (WMP 11.1%) but the distinction between the prevalence and incidence of this arrhythmia was not always clear. Amongst admissions for COVID‐19, the WMI for supraventricular arrhythmias was 8.5% (range: 0.0% to 24.7%), for ventricular arrhythmias was 2.7% (range 0.0% to 12.4%) and for either or otherwise unspecified arrhythmias the WMI was 9.3% (range 0% to 30.3%). Arrhythmias were more likely to be reported in severely‐ill participants, in those with an elevated plasma troponin (173), or in participants receiving interventions for COVID‐19 that are known to prolong the QT interval, such as hydroxychloroquine, particularly when given in combination with azithromycin (63). New‐onset atrial fibrillation was relatively common in those frequently monitored or admitted to ICU (14% in one study (51) and 8.5% and 8.0% in two other studies (18, 148)). Shao and colleagues reviewed hospital records from 761 people with severe COVID‐19 admitted to the Union Hospital in Wuhan, China, and reported that resuscitation was attempted after an in‐hospital cardiac arrest in 17.8% of cases. The initial cardiac rhythm was asystole in almost 90%; survival was poor (~ 3% at 30 days) (89). A high rate of cardiac arrest was also reported by Rosenberg and colleagues (12.4%) (63). Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation has been reported less frequently, in up to 5.9% of hospitalised patients, as reported by Guo and colleagues (167). Development of advanced atrioventricular (AV) block is rare (0.1%) (91). A clinically‐important increase in the QT interval was reported in 7.6% (WMI of 10 studies, n = 3989 participants) of those hospitalised with COVID‐19; more frequently in those who received hydroxychloroquine, or with renal dysfunction (27). In the study by Saleh and colleagues, that prospectively enrolled 201 participants treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, 4% had a QTc > 500 ms at baseline, increasing to 9% during treatment; 3.5% of participants required treatment discontinuation due to QT prolongation, but no case of torsades de pointes was reported (18). Treatment with hydroxychloroquine was also discontinued in eight participants (10%) enrolled in another study, due to electrocardiographic modifications, including a QT increase > 60 ms or development of QT > 500 ms (n = 7), and one case of first‐degree AV block (172). A QT increase of > 60 ms from baseline was rarer (0.8%) in those enrolled by Million and colleagues in Marseille, France (75).
Circulatory failure
Amongst almost 40,000 patients, predominantly admitted to ICU, the WMI of shock or treatment with vasopressors was 18.0% (range 0.2% to 71.0%). Shock was more likely to develop in men (43). Older age was also a risk factor for developing more severe disease and shock, often associated with a high comorbidity burden (131). Up to 50% of participants with a severe COVID‐19 infection developed acute kidney injury. The rate of renal replacement therapy (RRT) varied widely amongst reports (WMI 5.1%; range 0.0% to 50.0%). In a prospective study conducted in two hospitals in New York (17) in critically‐ill participants, mostly men (67%) aged more than 60 and with a high prevalence of comorbidities such as hypertension (63%), diabetes (36%), and chronic kidney disease (19%), around a third required RRT. In a multicentre cohort study that enrolled 2215 adults with COVID‐19 admitted to ICU at 65 hospitals in USA, development of acute kidney injury was common (43%), with 20% receiving RRT, and this was associated with a high mortality (51). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was rarely used (WMI of 1.1%; range 0.0% to 8.1% in 50 studies with 38,471 participants), perhaps reflecting low availability.
Heart failure
Heart failure (HF) was a common co‐morbidity (WMP 6.5%). The distinction between prevalent and incident heart failure was not always clear in reported studies, but the WMI at 6.8% (range 0.0% to 24.0%) was higher than for any cardiovascular event other than supraventricular tachycardia. The HF phenotype(s) reported were not described.
Myocarditis
We identified only three studies that reported possible cases of myocarditis complicating severe COVID‐19 infection (WMI 2.6%: range 0.0% to 12.5%). In a retrospective study that enrolled 112 participants in Wuhan, myocarditis was suspected in 14 (12.5%) because of elevated serum troponin, echocardiographic (often small pericardial effusions) and electrocardiographic abnormalities (205). Of these participants, four had pre‐existing heart failure, one had an MI in the previous week, and one had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; others had cardiovascular comorbidities, including hypertension and diabetes. Echocardiography did not reveal substantial left ventricular systolic dysfunction (i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%) in any participant. Gupta and colleagues reported that myocarditis, with or without pericarditis, complicated the course of COVID‐19 disease in 0.1% and 2.5%, respectively, of 2215 patients admitted to ICU at 65 hospitals in the USA between 04 March and 04 April 2020 (51). Saleh reports a possible case of myocarditis in one out of 210 participants (0.5%) enrolled (18).
Biomarkers
Troponin and natriuretic peptides
When measured, laboratory biomarkers were often deranged. Serum troponin was reported in 90 studies, and was elevated in up to 74% of participants in whom a test was requested. There was a gross heterogeneity in assays used, time of testing and ranges for normality. Cardiac injury was reported in 48 studies and usually defined as a serum troponin concentration above a reference range or the 99th percentile upper reference limit, with or without new abnormalities at echocardiography or electrocardiography. The incidence of cardiac injury ranged from 4.8%, in a study that enrolled participants older than 60 years with a mild COVID‐19 infection (overall mortality 2.9%, (220)), to 54% in critically‐ill participants (mortality 41% to 72%). In a prospective study that enrolled 2729 inpatients with COVID‐19 in the USA, Petrilli and colleagues showed that critically‐ill participants (n = 990) had higher blood concentrations of troponin‐I than those with milder disease (n = 1739) (0.07 (0.01 ‐ 0.10) versus 0.02 (0.01 ‐ 0.10) ng/mL) (10). In a retrospective study that enrolled 2736 hospitalised participants in New York (median age 66 years, 60% men, 39% with hypertension (HTN), 26% with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 17% with ischaemic heart disease (IHD)), troponin‐I was mildly elevated (> 0.03 to 0.09 ng/dL) in 16.6% and substantially elevated (> 0.09 ng/dL) in 19.4%; increases in troponin were associated with a higher mortality (47). Si and colleagues also found that in‐hospital mortality was higher in those with elevated cardiac troponin‐I compared to those with normal concentrations (71% (121/170) versus 6.6% (65/984)) (173).
When measured, plasma natriuretic peptides were also often abnormal (i.e. median NT‐proBNP was usually > 125 ng/L); plasma concentrations increased with the severity of COVID‐19 (139) or the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities. In a prospective study, which enrolled 143 participants hospitalised with COVID‐19 (mean age 63 years, 52% men, 39% with HTN, 12% with IHD), BNP was substantially elevated (i.e. > 100 ng/L) in almost 25% of the cohort (median 50 (25 ‐ 99) pg/mL) (25).
However, in studies that enrolled younger participants with few cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiac biomarkers were rarely elevated. For instance, in a study of 158 pregnant women, most of whom were asymptomatic or with mild disease (78%), elevated troponin (> 14 ng/L) was reported in only one case (178).
Other biomarkers: cardiac function at imaging
In a retrospective study of 110 participants hospitalised with COVID‐19 who had a transthoracic echocardiogram, Sud and colleagues reported a high prevalence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction: 54% amongst those who had biomarkers suggesting cardiac injury (n = 24, 22%) and 25% amongst those who did not; 25% also had impaired right ventricular (RV) function (208). Rath and colleagues prospectively enrolled 123 participants hospitalised with a COVID‐19 infection, 98 of whom had an echocardiogram: 10.8% had an impaired LVEF (≤ 50%) and 13.7% impaired RV function (26). Of 125 participants (mean age 64 years, 60% with HTN and 41% with T2DM) enrolled in another study (198), 28 (22%) had LVEF < 50% and 16 (14%) had regional wall motion abnormalities which were pre‐existent in only six. At follow‐up echocardiography, cardiac dysfunction resolved in 82% of these cases.
Death
The overall WMI for mortality was 6.1% (range 0.0% to 100%), increasing to 32% amongst cohorts entirely enrolled in ICU. An analysis of medical notes from 3032 people who died following a COVID‐19 infection (9.8% of all COVID‐19 related deaths) in Italy, showed that hypertension (68%), type II diabetes (30%) and ischaemic heart disease (28%) were the most prevalent comorbidities, and that dyspnoea was the most common symptom. Fewer than 9% were younger than 65 years and, of these, only 10.9% had no comorbidities. Hospitalisation was complicated by acute renal injury in 22% and by cardiac injury in 11% (44). Chen and colleagues reported clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of 113 participants (out of 799 admitted, 14%) with at least moderate COVID‐19 disease who died in Wuhan, China (138). Compared to those who recovered (n = 161), those who died were older (median age: 68 (62 ‐ 77) versus 51 (37 ‐ 66) years), more likely to have hypertension (48% versus 24%), diabetes (21% versus 14%) and cardiovascular disease (14% versus 4%), and to report dyspnoea (62%). They also had higher blood concentrations of NT‐proBNP (800 (390 ‐ 1818) vs 72 (20 ‐ 185) pg/mL) and high‐sensitivity troponin‐I (40.8 (14.7 ‐ 157.8) versus 3.3 (1.9 ‐ 7.0) pg/mL). Cardiovascular complications often preceded death compared to those that survived (heart failure: 49% versus 3%; acute cardiac injury: 77% versus 17%; shock 41% versus 0%).
Discussion
We found that hypertension, diabetes and ischaemic heart disease are common in people hospitalised with COVID‐19, and are associated with an increased risk of disease progression and death. In those admitted to hospital, biomarkers of cardiac stress or injury, and inflammation are often abnormal, and the incidence of a wide range of cardiovascular complications is substantial, particularly arrhythmias, heart failure and thrombotic complications. However, it is likely that biases in case‐ascertainment and failure to distinguish accurately between pre‐existing and incident conditions such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure, leads to over‐estimates of the incidence rates of some conditions. The rate of these conditions is higher in people aged over 75 years than in younger people infected with COVID‐19, and much lower in people who do not require admission to hospital with perhaps the exception of residents in care homes who may have high rates of morbidity and mortality despite not being admitted to hospital. More information on cardiovascular complications in this group of people is desirable, but may be difficult to obtain (230).
Our results support findings from other published systematic review and meta‐analyses that describe a high rate of incident cardiovascular complications in people with severe COVID‐19 infection. For instance, Liao and colleagues (231) report incident rates for atrial fibrillation (8.2%) and for ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (3.3%) similar to our findings. Compared with us, Jimenez and colleagues (232) report a numerically higher incidence of PE (7.1%) and DVT (12.1%), which might reflect a different study design, as they included many studies with fewer than 100 participants. More recently, Fu and colleagues (233) found that, amongst the 6130 hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 included in their meta‐analysis, the rate of cardiac injury is substantial, exceeding 20%, as also reported by us.
There are many potential mechanisms linking severe COVID‐19 infection with cardiovascular complications and poor outcomes. Indeed, for most people dying in hospital of any disease, the terminal event will be associated with the cessation of circulatory function; many deaths can simultaneously be considered as both cardiac and multi‐organ.
SARS‐CoV‐2 enters cells by binding to angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is highly expressed in the endothelium of every organ including the lungs, heart and kidney, and might, in theory, cause direct multi‐organ injury (2). Whether there is a specific myocarditis associated with COVID‐19 remains uncertain and, if so, whether the incidence differs from other acute systemic viral infections, such as influenza (230). A recent pathology study suggests increased myocardial macrophage infiltration, but is biased by small number of cases where specialist cardiac post‐mortem histopathological investigations were performed (234). However, there is strong evidence to suggest that COVID‐19 causes a coagulopathy leading to micro‐ and macro‐vascular thrombosis that may account for injury to the lung, heart, kidney and brain (235‐237). Prospective clinical studies of disease mechanisms are ongoing (238).
A severe inflammatory illness might destabilise pre‐existing cardiovascular disease, particularly in the elderly, who have less cardiovascular reserve. Hypoxia, caused by acute respiratory distress, reduces myocardial oxygen delivery, which may cause myocardial injury and ischaemia, especially in those with underlying ischaemic heart disease. Obesity complicates respiratory function, by increasing chest muscle work and diminishing lung compliance, which might contribute to developing a more severe COVID‐19 infection. Diabetes and obesity are also pro‐inflammatory conditions that may impair immune system function, and therefore either weaken clearance of pathogens or increase susceptibility to infections (239). Development of hypo‐ or hyper‐glycaemia and ketoacidosis might also contribute to poorer outcomes following a COVID‐19 infection amongst those with diabetes.
Infection, inflammation, hyper‐coagulability and vascular occlusion are a pathological chain leading to cardiovascular events, particularly in people who are critically ill (240, 241). COVID‐19 might cause coronary spasm, plaque rupture, and/or endothelitis with thrombosis and microvascular obstruction leading to myocardial damage, exacerbated by the increasing myocardial demand imposed by the metabolic stress of infection, combined with reduced oxygen supply due to hypoxia and jeopardised blood flow due to hypotension and shock (2, 230, 238). The right ventricle may also be impaired secondarily due to high pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary hypertension. Prolonged immobilisation increases the risk of venous thrombosis. The high risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism has led many to advocate therapeutic anticoagulation in severely‐ill people with COVID‐19, and potentially in earlier stages of the disease where D‐dimer or other biomarkers of thrombosis are substantially elevated, although evidence from randomised trials is lacking; therapeutic anticoagulation may increase the risk of bleeding, including cerebral haemorrhage. Trials of both efficacy and safety are required.
The high incidence of atrial arrhythmias reported in people with a severe COVID‐19 disease might further increase the risk of thromboembolic events. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias can be triggered by the metabolic stress of infection, acute myocardial injury, hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, or heart failure, or may develop as a consequence of medications such as hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin known to cause electrical instability and prolong the QT interval (242). Development of renal dysfunction predisposes to electrolyte abnormalities, arrhythmias and iatrogenic side effects, and further worsens prognosis.
Increases in biomarkers of cardiac injury and stress, such as troponin and natriuretic peptides, may reflect underlying cardiovascular risk factors and disease, rather than being a consequence of direct viral myocardial damage. However, their progressive rise during hospitalisation identifies people with a higher mortality (243). In children with severe COVID‐19 infection, coronary artery dilatation, arrhythmias, cardiac dysfunction and elevated blood troponin concentrations have been reported, albeit infrequently, suggesting direct involvement of the heart (244). For adults, imaging of the heart during hospitalisation usually shows little or no reduction in LV systolic function, particularly if troponin is normal. Moreover, histological evidence of the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 within the myocardium has rarely been reported, despite several millions of people infected by COVID‐19 worldwide so far (245, 246).
We do not yet have strong evidence that the rate of cardiovascular complications observed in people with a severe COVID‐19 infection is higher than that reported in similarly‐ill people with other infections. For instance, in a cohort of 262 people with severe sepsis who were mechanically ventilated, Landesberg and colleagues found that LV systolic (LVEF ≤ 50%) and diastolic dysfunction (e’ < 8 cm/s) were common (23% and 50%, respectively) and associated with high plasma NT‐proBNP (5762 (1001 ‐ 15,962 pg/mL)), hs‐troponin‐T (0.07 (0.02 ‐ 0.17 ng/mL)) and a high mortality (247).
Thrombotic events are also common in people with infections other than COVID‐19. In a prospective, multicentre study of 113 participants with severe sepsis, 84% of whom received anticoagulants, 42 (37%) developed venous thromboembolism (VTE), including 3.5% who had a PE (248). Sepsis may also increase the risk of stroke: in an analysis of 121,947 adults admitted with sepsis in California in 2009, 0.5% developed a stroke within a year of hospitalisation (249). In a population‐based study of 4389 people with bacteraemia in Denmark, Dalager‐Pedersen and colleagues showed that the risk of stroke or acute myocardial infarction (incidence: 3.6%) within a year from hospitalisation was twice as great as that for hospitalised matched controls (incidence: 1.7%) and around 20 times higher than that of the general population (incidence: 0.2%) (250). Up to 85% of people admitted to ICU with a community‐acquired pneumonia have, or will develop, an elevated serum troponin (251, 252). Severe sepsis is also associated with a high risk of atrial and fatal or non‐fatal ventricular arrhythmias, or development of heart failure (253‐255). Although it seems likely that COVID‐19 is associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular problems, the risk associated with other serious infections is not trivial.
Strengths and limitations
We included peer‐reviewed studies irrespective of their design, but not articles on pre‐print servers that might have contained additional information. We only included studies with 100 or more participants, to reduce reporting bias that is more likely in smaller studies. However, most studies were retrospective and therefore highly prone to reporting bias. Most studies comprised hospital cohorts, often focusing on participants admitted to an ICU. Most studies were from China or the USA, so generalisability might therefore be limited. Also, we cannot exclude overlap amongst some reports. We found great heterogeneity in study design, terminology, definitions, and presentation of findings, including reporting of blood tests and length of follow‐up, which made data extraction and summary challenging. Accordingly, we decided not to conduct a meta‐analysis, but rather mapped the existing literature and summarised our findings in a narrative fashion. We feel that this approach will inform readers and guide the design and selection of relevant outcomes in future versions of this review. We plan to report a formal meta‐analysis of outcomes based on a more homogeneous selected subsample (such as prospective cohort studies (238)) of included studies.
Authors' conclusions
This systematic literature review indicates that cardiometabolic comorbidities are common in people who are hospitalised with a severe COVID‐19 infection. The most frequent cardiovascular complications are cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure and arterial and venous occlusive events. Laboratory biomarkers may help identify those at greater risk of developing cardiovascular complications and of death.
What's new
| Date | Event | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 7 April 2022 | Amended | Reviews content amended according to an external feedback that did not change the objectives, scope or criteria for including studies. Conclusions not changed. See Acknowledgements. |
History
Review first published: Issue 3, 2021
Acknowledgements
PP, JGFC, CB and KM are support by the British Heart Foundation (RE/18/6134217). PDL is supported by UCL Biomedicine NIHR.
The Background and Methods section of this review are based on a standard template provided by Cochrane Heart.
Charlene Bridges (Cochrane Heart Information Specialist) developed a draft search strategy and conducted the electronic search. The search strategy was independently peer‐reviewed by Robin Featherstone.
We are grateful for peer review provided by Zhibing Lu (Department of Cardiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China) and Claudio Bravo (Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Washington, USA).
Authors also acknowledge Abou‐Setta A, Comment on: One does not conduct a review according to PRISMA. 17 March 2022. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013879/detailed-comment/en?messageId=358749923
Appendices
Appendix 1. Search strategies
CENTRAL
#1 MeSH descriptor: [Cardiovascular Diseases] explode all trees
#2 (heart* or cardiac* or coronary or cardio*)
#3 myocardial infarct*
#4 ACS
#5 MeSH descriptor: [Stroke] explode all trees
#6 stroke*
#7 cerebral vascular
#8 cerebrovasc*
#9 apoplexy
#10 (brain near/2 accident*)
#11 ((brain* or cerebral or lacunar) near/2 infarct*)
#12 Peripheral arterial
#13 MeSH descriptor: [Thrombosis] explode all trees
#14 thrombosis*
#15 pulmonary thromboembolism
#16 Arrhythmia*
#17 Supraventricular tachycardia
#18 (SVT or PSVT)
#19 atrial fibrillat*
#20 atrial flutter*
#21 (atrioventricular near/2 block)
#22 av block
#23 ventricular tachycardia*
#24 MeSH descriptor: [Shock] this term only
#25 (circulatory near/1 (failure or collapse))
#26 peripheral vascular failure
#27 MeSH descriptor: [Ultrafiltration] this term only
#28 Ultrafiltration
#29 MeSH descriptor: [Dialysis] this term only
#30 Dialysis
#31 Myocarditis
#32 MeSH descriptor: [Troponin] this term only
#33 Troponin*
#34 MeSH descriptor: [Natriuretic Peptide, Brain] this term only
#35 (BNP or NTproBNP)
#36 brain natriuretic peptide
#37 b‐type natriuretic peptide
#38 type‐b natriuretic peptide
#39 Ferritin
#40 Left ventricular ejection fraction
#41 LVEF
#42 MeSH descriptor: [Ventricular Dysfunction, Right] explode all trees
#43 MeSH descriptor: [Ventricular Dysfunction, Left] explode all trees
#44 (ventricular near/2 (function or dysfunction))
#45 ((rv or lv) near/2 (function or dysfunction))
#46 TAPSE
#47 Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
#48 prolonged QT interval
#49 QTc prolong*
#50 {OR #1‐#49}
#51 ((coronavirus* or corona virus*) and (Huanan or Hubei or Wuhan))
#52 coronavirus 19
#53 coronavirus disease 2019
#54 (COVID 19 or Covid 2019 or COVID19)
#55 (2019 nCoV or nCoV 2019 or "2019‐ncov" or ncov19 or ncov‐19 or "2019‐novel CoV")
#56 ((new or novel or nouveau) near/1 (corona virus* or coronavirus*))
#57 ("SARS‐CoV2" or "SARS CoV‐2" or SARSCoV2 or "SARSCoV‐2")
#58 (SARS‐coronavirus‐2 or Sars‐coronavirus2 or SARS‐like coronavirus)
#59 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus‐2 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2)
#60 {OR #51‐#59}
#61 #50 AND #60
MEDLINE Ovid
1 exp Cardiovascular Diseases/ (2381633)
2 (heart* or cardiac* or coronary or cardio*).tw. (1810527)
3 myocardial infarct*.tw. (193775)
4 ACS.tw. (21863)
5 exp Stroke/ (134474)
6 stroke*.tw. (246937)
7 cerebral vascular.tw. (5878)
8 cerebrovasc*.tw. (53962)
9 apoplexy.tw. (3061)
10 (brain adj2 accident*).tw. (170)
11 ((brain* or cerebral or lacunar) adj2 infarct*).tw. (26487)
12 Peripheral arterial.tw. (15393)
13 exp Thrombosis/ (129307)
14 thrombosis*.tw. (131401)
15 pulmonary thromboembolism.tw. (3492)
16 Arrhythmia*.tw. (84689)
17 Supraventricular tachycardia.tw. (5984)
18 (SVT or PSVT).tw. (2405)
19 atrial fibrillat*.tw. (69770)
20 atrial flutter*.tw. (5673)
21 (atrioventricular adj2 block).tw. (8105)
22 av block.tw. (3777)
23 ventricular tachycardia*.tw. (23563)
24 Shock/ (17596)
25 (circulatory adj1 (failure or collapse)).tw. (3276)
26 peripheral vascular failure.tw. (17)
27 Ultrafiltration/ (10114)
28 Ultrafiltration.tw. (15384)
29 Dialysis/ (12612)
30 Dialysis.tw. (106983)
31 Myocarditis.tw. (15115)
32 Troponin/ (5434)
33 Troponin*.tw. (25983)
34 Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/ (14223)
35 (BNP or NTproBNP).tw. (10586)
36 brain natriuretic peptide.tw. (9017)
37 b‐type natriuretic peptide.tw. (7278)
38 type‐b natriuretic peptide.tw. (70)
39 Ferritin.tw. (27639)
40 Left ventricular ejection fraction.tw. (25691)
41 LVEF.tw. (13360)
42 exp Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/ (5857)
43 exp Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/ (30656)
44 (ventricular adj2 (function or dysfunction)).tw. (57724)
45 ((rv or lv) adj2 (function or dysfunction)).tw. (18116)
46 TAPSE.tw. (916)
47 Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.tw. (1126)
48 prolonged QT interval.tw. (1029)
49 QTc prolong*.tw. (1747)
50 or/1‐49 (3513853)
51 ((coronavirus* or corona virus*) and (Huanan or Hubei or Wuhan)).tw. (1876)
52 "coronavirus 19".tw. (63)
53 "coronavirus disease 2019".tw. (5722)
54 (COVID 19 or Covid 2019 or COVID19).tw. (30069)
55 (2019 nCoV or nCoV 2019 or 2019‐ncov or ncov19 or ncov‐19 or 2019‐novel CoV).tw. (757)
56 ((new or novel or nouveau) adj1 (corona virus* or coronavirus*)).tw. (3985)
57 ("SARS‐CoV2" or "SARS CoV‐2" or SARSCoV2 or "SARSCoV‐2").tw. (8835)
58 (SARS‐coronavirus‐2 or Sars‐coronavirus2 or SARS‐like coronavirus).tw. (125)
59 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus‐2 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2).tw. (2810)
60 or/51‐59 (34488)
61 50 and 60 (3306)
62 exp animals/ not humans.sh. (4720043)
63 61 not 62 (3302)
64 limit 63 to yr="2019‐current" (3294)
Embase Ovid
1 exp cardiovascular disease/ (3889105)
2 (heart* or cardiac* or coronary or cardio*).tw. (2404039)
3 myocardial infarct*.tw. (263323)
4 ACS.tw. (41000)
5 exp cerebrovascular accident/ (208843)
6 stroke*.tw. (388455)
7 cerebral vascular.tw. (7222)
8 cerebrovasc*.tw. (75586)
9 apoplexy.tw. (2732)
10 (brain adj2 accident*).tw. (225)
11 ((brain* or cerebral or lacunar) adj2 infarct*).tw. (37380)
12 Peripheral arterial.tw. (21738)
13 exp thrombosis/ (309475)
14 thrombosis*.tw. (188875)
15 pulmonary thromboembolism.tw. (4804)
16 Arrhythmia*.tw. (119667)
17 Supraventricular tachycardia.tw. (7816)
18 (SVT or PSVT).tw. (4623)
19 atrial fibrillat*.tw. (124088)
20 atrial flutter*.tw. (8681)
21 (atrioventricular adj2 block).tw. (10044)
22 av block.tw. (6637)
23 ventricular tachycardia*.tw. (33353)
24 cardiogenic shock/ or shock/ (51606)
25 (circulatory adj1 (failure or collapse)).tw. (3922)
26 peripheral vascular failure.tw. (13)
27 ultrafiltration/ (21224)
28 Ultrafiltration.tw. (20167)
29 dialysis/ (48631)
30 Dialysis.tw. (141767)
31 Myocarditis.tw. (19668)
32 troponin/ (20922)
33 Troponin*.tw. (44425)
34 brain natriuretic peptide/ (29484)
35 (BNP or NTproBNP).tw. (26084)
36 brain natriuretic peptide.tw. (14139)
37 b‐type natriuretic peptide.tw. (11030)
38 type‐b natriuretic peptide.tw. (115)
39 Ferritin.tw. (39650)
40 Left ventricular ejection fraction.tw. (45951)
41 LVEF.tw. (40812)
42 exp heart right ventricle function/ (8194)
43 exp heart left ventricle function/ (44038)
44 (ventricular adj2 (function or dysfunction)).tw. (88055)
45 ((rv or lv) adj2 (function or dysfunction)).tw. (41173)
46 TAPSE.tw. (4272)
47 Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.tw. (2891)
48 prolonged QT interval.tw. (1561)
49 QTc prolong*.tw. (3172)
50 or/1‐49 (4942750)
51 ((coronavirus* or corona virus*) and (Huanan or Hubei or Wuhan)).tw. (1723)
52 "coronavirus 19".tw. (60)
53 "coronavirus disease 2019".tw. (4864)
54 (COVID 19 or Covid 2019 or COVID19).tw. (26529)
55 (2019 nCoV or nCoV 2019 or 2019‐ncov or ncov19 or ncov‐19 or 2019‐novel CoV).tw. (677)
56 ((new or novel or nouveau) adj1 (corona virus* or coronavirus*)).tw. (3611)
57 ("SARS‐CoV2" or "SARS CoV‐2" or SARSCoV2 or "SARSCoV‐2").tw. (7482)
58 (SARS‐coronavirus‐2 or Sars‐coronavirus2 or SARS‐like coronavirus).tw. (118)
59 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus‐2 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2).tw. (2339)
60 or/51‐59 (30597)
61 50 and 60 (4272)
62 (animal/ or nonhuman/) not human/ (5599194)
63 61 not 62 (4252)
64 limit 63 to yr="2019‐current" (4230)
65 limit 64 to embase (3018)
Cochrane COVID‐19 Study Register
(heart* OR cardiac* OR coronary OR cardio*)
ClinicalTrials.Gov
COVID‐19 AND (heart* OR cardiac* OR coronary OR cardio*)
EU Clinical Trials Register
covid‐19 AND (heart* OR cardiac* OR coronary OR cardio*)
Appendix 2. Search overview
| Database searched | Date searched | Number of results |
| CENTRAL Issue 7 of 12, 2020 (Cochrane Library) | 24 July 2020 | 151 |
| Epub Ahead of Print, In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 22 July 2020) | 24 July 2020 | 3294 |
| Embase (Ovid, 1980 to 2020 week 29) | 24 July 2020 | 3018 |
| Cochrane COVID‐19 Study Register | 24 July 2020 | 1486 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov | 24 July 2020 | 75 |
| EU Clinical Trials Register | 24 July 2020 | 60 |
| Total | 8,084 | |
| After de‐duplication | 5464 | |
Appendix 3. References
1) Ortega‐Paz L, Capodanno D, Montalescot G, Angiolillo DJ. Coronavirus disease 2019‐associated thrombosis and coagulopathy: review of the pathophysiological characteristics and implications for antithrombotic management. Journal of the American Heart Association 2021;10(3):e019650.
2) Guzik TJ, Mohiddin SA, Dimarco A, Patel V, Savvatis K, Marelli‐Berg FM, et al. COVID‐19 and the cardiovascular system: implications for risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Cardiovascular Research 2020;116(10):1666‐87.
3) Giustino G, Pinney SP, Lala A, Reddy VY, Johnston‐Cox HA, Mechanick JI, et al. Coronavirus and cardiovascular disease, myocardial injury, and arrhythmia: JACC Focus Seminar. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020;76(17):2011‐23.
4) Giustino G, Croft LB, Stefanini GG, Bragato R, Silbiger JJ, Vicenzi M, et al. Characterization of myocardial injury in patients with COVID‐19. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020;76(18):2043‐55.
5) Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535]
6) Briggs J. Critical Appraisal Tools. joannabriggs.org/critical-appraisal-tools (accessed prior to 22 January 2021).
7) Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, Du R, Zhao J, Jin Y, et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID‐19: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2020;395(10236):1569‐78.
8) Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G, et al. A trial of Lopinavir‐Ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid‐19. New England Journal of Medicine 2020;382(19):1787‐99.
9) Deftereos SG, Giannopoulos G, Vrachatis DA, Siasos GD, Giotaki SG, Gargalianos P, et al. Effect of Colchicine vs standard care on cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with Coronavirus disease 2019: the GRECCO‐19 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 2020;3(6):e2013136.
10) Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, Rajagopalan H, O'Donnell L, Chernyak Y, et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2020;369:m1966.
11) Cen Y, Chen X, Shen Y, Zhang XH, Lei Y, Xu C, et al. Risk factors for disease progression in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019‐a multi‐centre observational study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2020;26(9):1242–7.
12) Lee LY, Cazier JB, Angelis V, Arnold R, Bisht V, Campton NA, et al. COVID‐19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10241):1919‐26. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140‐6736(20)31173‐9]. Erratum in: Lancet 2020;396(10250):534.
13) Wendel Garcia PD, Fumeaux T, Guerci P, Heuberger DM, Montomoli J, Roche‐Campo F, et al. Prognostic factors associated with mortality risk and disease progression in 639 critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in Europe: initial report of the international RISC‐19‐ICU prospective observational cohort. EClinicalMedicine 2020;(25):100449.
14) Ciceri F, Castagna A, Rovere‐Querini P, De Cobelli F, Ruggeri A, Galli L, et al. Early predictors of clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 outbreak in Milan, Italy. Clinical Immunology. 2020;(217):108509.
15) Saluja M, Pillai D, Jeliya S, Bauddh N, Chandel R. COVID 19‐ clinical profile, radiological presentation, prognostic predictors, complications and outcome: a perspective from the Indian subcontinent. Journal of the Associantion of Physicians of India. 2020;68(7):13‐8.
16) Ortiz‐Brizuela E, Villanueva‐Reza M, González‐Lara MF, Tamez‐Torres KM, Román‐Montes CM, Díaz‐Mejía BA, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with COVID‐19 in a tertiary care center in Mexico City: a prospective cohort study. Revista de Investigacion Clinica 2020;72(3):165‐77.
17) Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID‐19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10239):1763‐70.
18) Saleh M, Gabriels J, Chang D, Soo Kim B, Mansoor A, Mahmood E, et al. Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin on the corrected QT interval in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2020;13(6):e008662.
19) Garassino MC, Whisenant JG, Huang LC, Trama A, Torri V, Agustoni F, et al. COVID‐19 in patients with thoracic malignancies (TERAVOLT): first results of an international, registry‐based, cohort study. Lancet Oncology 2020;21(7):914‐22.
20) Rieder M, Goller I, Jeserich M, Baldus N, Pollmeier L, Wirth L, et al. Rate of venous thromboembolism in a prospective all‐comers cohort with COVID‐19. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2020:50(3); 558‐66 [DOI: 10.1007/s11239‐020‐02202‐8]
21) Du RH, Liang LR, Yang CQ, Wang W, Cao TZ, Li M, et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia caused by SARS‐CoV‐2: a prospective cohort study. European Respiratory Journal 2020;55(5):2000524.
22) Dubois‐Silva Á, Barbagelata‐López C, Mena Á, Piñeiro‐Parga P, Llinares‐García D, Freire‐Castro S. Pulmonary embolism and screening for concomitant proximal deep vein thrombosis in noncritically ill hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Internal and Emergency Medicine 2020;15(5):865‐70.
23) Demelo‐Rodríguez P, Cervilla‐Muñoz E, Ordieres‐Ortega L, Parra‐Virto A, Toledano‐Macías M, Toledo‐Samaniego N, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia and elevated D‐dimer levels. Thrombosis Research 2020;192:23‐6.
24) Helms J, Tacquard C, Severac F, Leonard‐Lorant I, Ohana M, Delabranche X, et al. High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Medicine 2020;46(6):1089‐98.
25) Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D, Jiang C, Mei H, Wang J, et al. Deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. Circulation 2020;142(2):114‐28.
26) Rath D, Petersen‐Uribe Á, Avdiu A, Witzel K, Jaeger P, Zdanyte M, et al. Impaired cardiac function is associated with mortality in patients with acute COVID‐19 infection. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2020:109(12):1491‐9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00392‐020‐01683‐0]
27) Moschini L, Loffi M, Regazzoni V, Di Tano G, Gherbesi E, Danzi GB. Effects on QT interval of hydroxychloroquine associated with ritonavir/darunavir or azithromycin in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Heart Vessels 2021; 36(1):115‐20. [DOI: 10.1007/s00380‐020‐01671‐4]
28) Wei JF, Huang FY, Xiong TY, Liu Q, Chen H, Wang H, et al. Acute myocardial injury is common in patients with COVID‐19 and impairs their prognosis. Heart 2020;106(15):1154‐9.
29) Toniati P, Piva S, Cattalini M, Garrafa E, Regola F, Castelli F, et al. Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID‐19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: a single center study of 100 patients in Brescia, Italy. Autoimmunity Reviews 2020;19(7):102568.
30) Stokes EK, Zambrano LD, Anderson KN, Marder EP, Raz KM, El Burai Felix S, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 case surveillance ‐ United States, January 22‐May 30, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020;69(24):759‐65.
31) Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT, Woodworth K, Galang RR, Zambrano LD, et al. Characteristics of women of reproductive age with laboratory‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection by pregnancy status ‐ United States, January 22‐June 7, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020;69(25):769‐75.
32) Kammar‐García A, Vidal‐Mayo JJ, Vera‐Zertuche JM, Lazcano‐Hernández M, Vera‐López O, Segura‐Badilla O, et al. Impact of comorbidities in Mexican SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients: a retrospective analysis in a national cohort. Revista de Investigacion Clinica 2020;72(3):151‐8.
33) Soares RC, Mattos LR, Raposo LM. Risk factors for hospitalization and mortality due to COVID‐19 in Espírito Santo State, Brazil. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020;103(3):1184‐90.
34) Annie F, Bates MC, Nanjundappa A, Bhatt DL, Alkhouli M. Prevalence and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke among patients ≤50 years of age with laboratory confirmed COVID‐19 infection. American Journal of Cardiology 2020;130:169‐70.
35) Kuno T, Takahashi M, Obata R, Maeda T. Cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiac injury, and prognosis of COVID‐19 in New York City. American Heart Journal 2020;226:24‐5.
36) Mikami T, Miyashita H, Yamada T, Harrington M, Steinberg D, Dunn A, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID‐19 in New York City. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2021: 36(1); 17‐26. [DOI: 10.1007/s11606‐020‐05983‐z]
37) Qin JJ, Cheng X, Zhou F, Lei F, Akolkar G, Cai J, et al. Redefining cardiac biomarkers in predicting mortality of inpatients with COVID‐19. Hypertension 2020;76(4):1104‐12.
38) Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 in the New York City area. JAMA 2020;323(20):2052‐9.
39) Hirsch JS, Ng JH, Ross DW, Sharma P, Shah HH, Barnett RL, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with COVID‐19. Kidney International 2020;98(1):209‐18.
40) Jung SY, Choi JC, You SH, Kim WY. Association of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors with COVID‐19‐related outcomes in Korea: a nationwide population‐based cohort study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020 71(16); 2121‐8:ciaa624.
41) Fosbøl EL, Butt JH, Østergaard L, Andersson C, Selmer C, Kragholm K, et al. Association of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use with COVID‐19 diagnosis and mortality. JAMA 2020;324(2):168‐77.
42) Price‐Haywood EG, Burton J, Fort D, Seoane L. Hospitalization and mortality among black patients and white patients with Covid‐19. New England Journal of Medicine 2020;382(26):2534‐43.
43) Chen J, Bai H, Liu J, Chen G, Liao Q, Yang J, et al. Distinct clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality in female COVID‐19 inpatients: a sex‐stratified large‐scale cohort study in Wuhan, China. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020 71(12); 3188‐95:ciaa920. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa920]
44) Palmieri L, Vanacore N, Donfrancesco C, Lo Noce C, Canevelli M, Punzo O, et al. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized individuals dying with COVID‐19 by age group in Italy. Journals of Gerontology: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2020;75(9):1796‐800.
45) Rastad H, Karim H, Ejtahed HS, Tajbakhsh R, Noorisepehr M, Babaei M, et al. Risk and predictors of in‐hospital mortality from COVID‐19 in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome 2020 Jul 6;12:57.
46) Gao C, Cai Y, Zhang K, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. Association of hypertension and antihypertensive treatment with COVID‐19 mortality: a retrospective observational study. European Heart Journal 2020;41(22):2058‐66.
47) Lala A, Johnson KW, Januzzi JL, Russak AJ, Paranjpe I, Richter F, et al. Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 infection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020;76(5):533‐46.
48) Kim L, Garg S, O'Halloran A, Whitaker M, Pham H, Anderson EJ, et al. Risk factors for intensive care unit admission and in‐hospital mortality among hospitalized adults identified through the U.S. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐associated hospitalization surveillance network (COVID‐NET). Clinical Infectious Disease 2020 Jul 16:ciaa1012.
49) Phipps MM, Barraza LH, LaSota ED, Sobieszczyk ME, Pereira MR, ZHENG EX, et al. Acute liver injury in COVID‐19: prevalence and association with clinical outcomes in a large US cohort. Hepatology 2020; 72(3); 807‐17 [DOI:10.1002/hep.31404]
50) Borobia AM, Carcas AJ, Arnalich F, Álvarez‐Sala R, Monserrat‐Villatoro J, Quintana M, et al. A cohort of patients with COVID‐19 in a major teaching hospital in Europe. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020;9(6):1733.
51) Gupta S, Hayek SS, Wang W, Chan L, Mathews KS, Melamed ML, et al. Factors associated with death in critically ill patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Internal Medicine 2020; 180(11); 1‐12:e203596.
52) Sousa GJ, Garces TS, Cestari VR, Florêncio RS, Moreira TM, Pereira ML. Mortality and survival of COVID‐19. Epidemiology and Infection 2020 Jun 25;148:e123.
53) Wu J, Huang J, Zhu G, Wang Q, Lv Q, Huang Y, et al. Elevation of blood glucose level predicts worse outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care 2020;8(1):e001476.
54) Merkler AE, Parikh NS, Mir S, Gupta A, Kamel H, Lin E, et al. Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vs patients with influenza. JAMA Neurology 2020 77(11); 1‐7:e202730.
55) Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Yang S, Zhang S, Chen M, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID‐19 patients with a history of stroke in Wuhan, China. Stroke 2020;51(7):2219‐23.
56) Mehta N, Kalra A, Nowacki AS, Anjewierden S, Han Z, Bhat P, et al. Association of use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with testing positive for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). JAMA Cardiology 2020;5(9):1020‐6.
57) Hernández‐Fernández F, Valencia HS, Barbella‐Aponte RA, Collado‐Jiménez R, Ayo‐Martín Ó, Barrena C, et al. Cerebrovascular disease in patients with COVID‐19: neuroimaging, histological and clinical description. Brain 2020; 143(10); 3089‐103:awaa239. [DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa239]
58) Bravi F, Flacco ME, Carradori T, Volta CA, Cosenza G, De Togni A, et al. Predictors of severe or lethal COVID‐19, including Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, in a sample of infected Italian citizens. PLOS One 2020;15(6):e0235248.
59) Iaccarino G, Grassi G, Borghi C, Ferri C, Salvetti M, Volpe M, et al. Age and multimorbidity predict death among COVID‐19 patients: results of the SARS‐RAS study of the Italian Society of Hypertension. Hypertension 2020;76(2):366‐72.
60) Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA 2020;323(16):1574‐81.
61) Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID‐19 in China: a nationwide analysis. European Respiratory Journal 2020;55(5):2000547.
62) Alsofayan YM, Althunayyan SM, Khan AA, Hakawi AM, Assiri AM. Clinical characteristics of COVID‐19 in Saudi Arabia: a national retrospective study. Journal of Infection and Public Health 2020;13(7):920‐5.
63) Rosenberg ES, Dufort EM, Udo T, Wilberschied LA, Kumar J, Tesoriero J, et al. Association of treatment with Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin with in‐hospital mortality in patients with COVID‐19 in New York state. JAMA 2020;323(24):2493‐502.
64) Cantador E, Núñez A, Sobrino P, Espejo V, Fabia L, Vela L, et al. Incidence and consequences of systemic arterial thrombotic events in COVID‐19 patients. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2020; 50(3):543‐7. [DOI: 10.1007/s11239‐020‐02176‐7]
65) Cariou B, Hadjadj S, Wargny M, Pichelin M, Al‐Salameh A, Allix I, et al. Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID‐19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study. Diabetologia 2020;63(8):1500‐15.
66) Imam Z, Odish F, Gill I, O'Connor D, Armstrong J, Vanood A, et al. Older age and comorbidity are independent mortality predictors in a large cohort of 1305 COVID‐19 patients in Michigan, United States. Journal of Internal Medicine 2020;288(4):469‐76.
67) Fauvel C, Weizman O, Trimaille A, Mika D, Pommier T, Pace N, et al. Pulmonary embolism in COVID‐19 patients: a French multicentre cohort study. European Heart Journal 2020;41(32): 3058‐68.
68) Bean DM, Kraljevic Z, Searle T, Bendayan R, Kevin O, Pickles A, et al. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are not associated with severe COVID‐19 infection in a multi‐site UK acute hospital trust. European Journal of Heart Failure 2020;22(6):967‐74.
69) Li J, Wang X, Chen J, Zhang H, Deng A. Association of renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors with severity or risk of death in patients with hypertension hospitalized for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiology 2020;5(7):825‐30.
70) Chougar L, Shor N, Weiss N, Galanaud D, Leclercq D, Mathon B, et al. Retrospective observational study of brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and neurological manifestations. Radiology 2020 297(3); E313‐23:202422.
71) Galloway JB, Norton S, Barker RD, Brookes A, Carey I, Clarke BD, et al. A clinical risk score to identify patients with COVID‐19 at high risk of critical care admission or death: an observational cohort study. Journal of Infection 2020;81(2):282‐8.
72) De Abajo FJ, Rodríguez‐Martín S, Lerma V, Mejía‐Abril G, Aguilar M, García‐Luque A, et al. Use of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID‐19 requiring admission to hospital: a case‐population study. Lancet 2020;395(10238):1705‐14.
73) Zhang P, Zhu L, Cai J, Lei F, Qin JJ, Xie J, et al. Association of inpatient use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with mortality among patients with hypertension hospitalized with COVID‐19. Circulation Research 2020;126(12):1671‐81.
74) Luo Y, Xue Y, Mao L, Yuan X, Lin Q, Tang G, et al. Prealbumin as a predictor of prognosis in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019. Frontiers in Medicine 2020;7:374.
75) Million M, Lagier JC, Gautret P, Colson P, Fournier PE, Amrane S, et al. Early treatment of COVID‐19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: a retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 2020 May‐Jun;35:101738.
76) Wang X, Fang J, Zhu Y, Chen L, Ding F, Zhou R, et al. Clinical characteristics of non‐critically ill patients with novel coronavirus infection (COVID‐19) in a Fangcang hospital. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2020;26(8):1063‐8.
77) Zhao M, Wang M, Zhang J, Gu J, Zhang P, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 at different ages. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(11):10070‐86.
78) Argenziano MG, Bruce SL, Slater CL, Tiao JR, Baldwin MR, Barr RG, et al. Characterization and clinical course of 1000 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York: retrospective case series. BMJ 2020 May 29;369:m1996.
79) Pan W, Zhang J, Wang M, Ye J, Xu Y, Shen B, et al. Clinical features of COVID‐19 in patients with essential hypertension and the impacts of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors on the prognosis of COVID‐19 patients. Hypertension 2020;76(3):732‐41.
80) López‐Otero D, López‐Pais J, Cacho‐Antonio CE, Antúnez‐Muiños PJ, González‐Ferreiro T, Pérez‐Poza M, et al. Impact of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on COVID‐19 in a western population. CARDIOVID registry. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia 2020; 74(2); 175‐82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.05.018]
81) Xiong W, Mu J, Guo J, Lu L, Liu D, Luo J, et al. New onset neurologic events in people with COVID‐19 in 3 regions in China. Neurology 2020;95(11):e1479‐87.
82) Chen Y, Yang D, Cheng B, Chen J, Peng A, Yang C, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with diabetes and COVID‐19 in association with glucose‐lowering medication. Diabetes Care 2020;43(7):1399‐407.
83) Hu J, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhao H, Lian J, Hao S, et al. COVID‐19 patients with hypertension have more severity condition, and ACEI/ARB treatment have no influence on the clinical severity and outcome. Journal of Infection 2020; 81(6); 979‐97. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.056]
84) Ye C, Zhang S, Zhang X, Cai H, Gu J, Lian J, et al. Impact of comorbidities on patients with COVID‐19: a large retrospective study in Zhejiang, China. Journal of Medical Virology 2020; 92(11); 2821‐9. [DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26183]
85) Rothstein A, Oldridge O, Schwennesen H, Do D, Cucchiara BL. Acute cerebrovascular events in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients. Stroke 2020;51(9):e219‐22.
86) Albitar O, Ballouze R, Ooi JP, Sheikh Ghadzi SM. Risk factors for mortality among COVID‐19 patients. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2020 Aug;166:108293. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108293]
87) Lian J, Jin X, Hao S, Cai H, Zhang S, Zheng L, et al. Analysis of epidemiological and clinical features in older patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outside Wuhan. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020;71(15):740‐7.
88) Hajifathalian K, Kumar S, Newberry C, Shah S, Fortune B, Krisko T, et al. Obesity is associated with worse outcomes in COVID‐19: analysis of early data from New York City. Obesity 2020;28(9):1606‐12.
89) Shao F, Xu S, Ma X, Xu Z, Lyu J, Ng M, et al. In‐hospital cardiac arrest outcomes among patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Resuscitation 2020;151:18‐23.
90) Uribarri A, Núñez‐Gil IJ, Aparisi A, Becerra‐Muñoz VM, Feltes G, Trabattoni D, et al. Impact of renal function on admission in COVID‐19 patients: an analysis of the international HOPE COVID‐19 (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID 19) Registry. Journal of Nephrology 2020;33(4):737‐45.
91) McCullough SA, Goyal P, Krishnan U, Choi JJ, Safford MM, Okin PM. Electrocardiographic findings in Coronavirus disease‐19: insights on mortality and underlying myocardial processes. Journal of Cardiac Failure 2020;26(7):626‐32.
92) Tian J, Yuan X, Xiao J, Zhong Q, Yang C, Liu B, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID‐19 disease severity in patients with cancer in Wuhan, China: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncology 2020;21(7):893‐903.
93) Lorente‐Ros A, Monteagudo Ruiz JM, Rincón LM, Ortega Pérez R, Rivas S, Martínez‐Moya R, et al. Myocardial injury determination improves risk stratification and predicts mortality in COVID‐19 patients. Cardiology Journal 2020; 27(5); 489‐96. [DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0089]
94) Bhatla A, Mayer MM, Adusumalli S, Hyman MC, Oh E, Tierney A, et al. COVID‐19 and cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2020;17(9):1439‐44.
95) Nie Y, Li J, Huang X, Guo W, Zhang X, Ma Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 671 COVID‐19 patients in Henan Province, China. International Journal of Epidemiology 2020;49(4); 1085‐95. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa081]
96) Shi S, Qin M, Cai Y, Liu T, Shen B, Yang F, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of myocardial injury in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019. European Heart Journal 2020;41(22):2070‐9.
97) Zhang X, Cai H, Hu J, Lian J, Gu J, Zhang S, et. Epidemiological, clinical characteristics of cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection with abnormal imaging findings. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2020;94:81‐7.
98) Şenkal N, Meral R, Medetalibeyoğlu A, Konyaoğlu H, Kose M, Tukek T. Association between chronic ACE inhibitor exposure and decreased odds of severe disease in patients with COVID‐19. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology 2020;24(1):21‐9.
99) Barman HA, Atici A, Sahin I, Alici G, Aktas Tekin E, Baycan ÖF, et al. Prognostic significance of cardiac injury in COVID‐19 patients with and without coronary artery disease. Coronary Artery Disease 2020 Jun 19 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000914]
100) Wang S, Ma P, Zhang S, Song S, Wang Z, Ma Y, et al. Fasting blood glucose at admission is an independent predictor for 28‐day mortality in patients with COVID‐19 without previous diagnosis of diabetes: a multi‐centre retrospective study. Diabetologia 2020;63(10):2102‐11.
101) Gianfrancesco M, Hyrich KL, Al‐Adely S, Carmona L, Danila MI, Gossec L, et al. Characteristics associated with hospitalisation for COVID‐19 in people with rheumatic disease: data from the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician‐reported registry. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2020;79(7):859‐66.
102) Shang J, Wang Q, Zhang H, Wang X, Wan J, Yan Y, et al. The relationship between diabetes mellitus and COVID‐19 prognosis: a retrospective cohort study in Wuhan, China. American Journal of Medicine 2021; 134(1):E6‐E14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amj med.2020.05.033]
103) Li X, Xu S, Yu M, Wang K, Tao Y, Zhou Y, et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID‐19 inpatients in Wuhan. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2020;146(1):110‐8.
104) Zhang J, Lu S, Wang X, Jia X, Li J, Lei H, et al. Do underlying cardiovascular diseases have any impact on hospitalised patients with COVID‐19? Heart 2020;106(15):1148‐53.
105) San Román JA, Uribarri A, Amat‐Santos IJ, Aparisi Á, Catalá P, González‐Juanatey JR. The presence of heart disease worsens prognosis in patients with COVID‐19. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia 2020;73(9):773‐5.
106) Bhandari S, Singh A, Sharma R, Rankawat G, Banerjee S, Gupta V, et al. Characteristics, treatment outcomes and role of hydroxychloroquine among 522 COVID‐19 hospitalized patients in Jaipur city: an epidemio‐clinical study. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2020;68(6):13‐9.
107) Lian J, Jin X, Hao S, Jia H, Cai H, Zhang X, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and virological characteristics of 465 hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) from Zhejiang province in China. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 2020;14(5):564‐74.
108) Suleyman G, Fadel RA, Malette KM, Hammond C, Abdulla H, Entz A, et al. Clinical characteristics and morbidity associated with Coronavirus disease 2019 in a series of patients in metropolitan Detroit. JAMA Network Open 2020;3(6):e2012270.
109) Yang G, Tan Z, Zhou L, Yang M, Peng L, Liu J, et al. Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers and ACE (angiotensin‐converting enzyme) inhibitors on virus infection, inflammatory status, and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID‐19 and hypertension: a single‐center retrospective study. Hypertension 2020;76(1):51‐8.
110) Jain S, Workman V, Ganeshan R, Obasare ER, Burr A, DeBiasi RM, et al. Enhanced electrocardiographic monitoring of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019. Heart Rhythm 2020;17(9):1417‐22.
111) Brill SE, Jarvis HC, Ozcan E, Burns TL, Warraich RA, Amani LJ, et al. COVID‐19: a retrospective cohort study with focus on the over‐80s and hospital‐onset disease. BMC Medicine 2020;18(1):194.
112) Xiao LS, Zhang WF, Gong MC, Zhang YP, Chen LY, Zhu HB, et al. Development and validation of the HNC‐LL score for predicting the severity of coronavirus disease 2019. EBioMedicine 2020;57:102880.
113) Aloisio E, Chibireva M, Serafini L, Pasqualetti S, Falvella FS, Dolci A, et al. A comprehensive appraisal of laboratory biochemistry tests as major predictors of COVID‐19 severity. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 2020;144(12); 1457‐64. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020‐0389‐SA]
114) Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiology 2020;5(7):802‐10.
115) Gayam V, Chobufo MD, Merghani MA, Lamichanne S, Garlapati PR, Adler MK. Clinical characteristics and predictors of mortality in African‐Americans with COVID‐19 from an inner‐city community teaching hospital in New York. Journal of Medical Virology 2021;93(2); 812‐9. [DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26306]
116) Al‐Samkari H, Karp Leaf RS, Dzik WH, Carlson JC, Fogerty AE, Waheed A, et al. COVID‐19 and coagulation: bleeding and thrombotic manifestations of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Blood 2020;136(4):489‐500.
117) Patell R, Bogue T, Bindal P, Koshy A, Merrill M, Aird WC, et al. Incidence of thrombosis and hemorrhage in hospitalized cancer patients with COVID‐19. Journal of Thrombosis Haemostasis 2020;18(9); 2349‐57. [DOI:10.1111/jth.15018]
118) Sinkeler FS, Berger FA, Muntinga HJ, Jansen MM. The risk of QTc‐interval prolongation in COVID‐19 patients treated with chloroquine. Netherlands Heart Journal 2020;28(7‐8):418‐23.
119) Goyal P, Choi JJ, Pinheiro LC, Schenck EJ, Chen R, Jabri A, et al. Clinical characteristics of Covid‐19 in New York City. New England Journal of Medicine 2020;382(24):2372‐4.
120) Lodigiani C, Iapichino G, Carenzo L, Cecconi M, Ferrazzi P, Sebastian T, et al. Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID‐19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy. Thrombosis Research 2020;191:9‐14.
121) Liao D, Zhou F, Luo L, Xu M, Wang H, Xia J, et al. Haematological characteristics and risk factors in the classification and prognosis evaluation of COVID‐19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematology 2020;7(9):e671‐e678.
122) Myers LC, Parodi SM, Escobar GJ, Liu VX. Characteristics of hospitalized adults with COVID‐19 in an integrated health care system in California. JAMA 2020;323(21):2195‐8.
123) Hashemi N, Viveiros K, Redd WD, Zhou JC, McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, et al. Impact of chronic liver disease on outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19: a multicentre United States experience. Liver International 2020;40(10); 2515‐21. [DOI:10.1111/liv.14583]
124) Huang J, Cheng A, Lin S, Zhu Y, Chen G. Individualized prediction nomograms for disease progression in mild COVID‐19. Journal of Medical Virology 2020;92(10);2074‐80. [DOI:10.1002/jmv.25969]
125) Wang L, He W, Yu X, Hu D, Bao M, Liu H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4‐week follow‐up. Journal of Infection 2020;80(6):639‐45.
126) Toussie D, Voutsinas N, Finkelstein M, Cedillo MA, Manna S, Maron SZ, et al. Clinical and chest radiography features determine patient outcomes in young and middle‐aged adults with COVID‐19. Radiology 2020;297(1):E197‐E206.
127) Ferrante G, Fazzari F, Cozzi O, Maurina M, Bragato R, D'Orazio F, et al. Risk factors for myocardial injury and death in patients with COVID‐19: insights from a cohort study with chest computed tomography. Cardiovascular Research 2020;116(14);2239‐46. [DOI:10.1093/cvr/cvaa193].
128) Hu L, Chen S, Fu Y, Gao Z, Long H, Wang JM, et al. Risk factors associated with clinical outcomes in 323 COVID‐19 hospitalized patients in Wuhan, China. Clinical Infectious Disease 2020;71(16);2089‐98. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa539]
129) Biagi A, Rossi L, Malagoli A, Zanni A, Sticozzi C, Comastri G, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 320 deceased patients with COVID‐19 in an Italian province: a retrospective observational study. Journal of Medical Virology 2020;92(11);2718‐24. [DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26147]
130) Violi F, Cangemi R, Romiti GF, Ceccarelli G, Oliva A, Alessandri F, et al. Is albumin predictor of mortality in COVID‐19? Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 2020 Jun 22 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1089/ars.2020.8142]
131) Li T, Lu L, Zhang W, Tao Y, Wang L, Bao J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 312 hospitalized older patients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2020;91;104185. [DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104185]
132) Nie SF, Yu M, Xie T, Yang F, Wang HB, Wang ZH, et al. Cardiac troponin I is an independent predictor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. Circulation 2020;142(6):608‐10.
133) Huang S, Wang J, Liu F, Liu J, Cao G, Yang C, et al. COVID‐19 patients with hypertension have more severe disease: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Hypertension Research 2020;43(8):824‐31.
134) Shi Q, Zhang X, Jiang F, Zhang X, Hu N, Bimu C, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality of COVID‐19 patients with diabetes in Wuhan, China: a two‐center, retrospective study. Diabetes Care 2020;43(7):1382‐91.
135) Ayanian S, Reyes J, Lynn L, Teufel K. The association between biomarkers and clinical outcomes in novel coronavirus pneumonia in a US cohort. Biomarkers in Medicine 2020;14(12):1091‐7.
136) Wang K, Zuo P, Liu Y, Zhang M, Zhao X, Xie S, et al. Clinical and laboratory predictors of in‐hospital mortality in patients with COVID‐19: a cohort study in Wuhan, China. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020 71(16);2079‐88. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa538]
137) Wu J, Li W, Shi X, Chen Z, Jiang B, Liu J, et al. Early antiviral treatment contributes to alleviate the severity and improve the prognosis of patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). Journal of Internal Medicine 2020;288(1):128‐38.
138) Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, Yan W, Yang D, Chen G, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ 2020;368:m1091.
139) Han H, Xie L, Liu R, Yang J, Liu F, Wu K, et al. Analysis of heart injury laboratory parameters in 273 COVID‐19 patients in one hospital in Wuhan, China. Journal of Medical Virology 2020;92(7):819‐23.
140) Deng P, Ke Z, Ying B, Qiao B, Yuan L. The diagnostic and prognostic role of myocardial injury biomarkers in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. Clinica Chimica Acta 2020;510:186‐90.
141) Okoh AK, Sossou C, Dangayach NS, Meledathu S, Phillips O, et al. Coronavirus disease 19 in minority populations of Newark, New Jersey. International Journal for Equity in Health 2020;19(1):93.
142) Yao Y, Cao J, Wang Q, Shi Q, Liu K, Luo Z, et al. D‐dimer as a biomarker for disease severity and mortality in COVID‐19 patients: a case control study. Journal of Intensive Care 2020;8:49.
143) Xu J, Yang X, Yang L, Zou X, Wang Y, Wu Y, et al. Clinical course and predictors of 60‐day mortality in 239 critically ill patients with COVID‐19: a multicenter retrospective study from Wuhan, China. Critical Care 2020;24(1):394.
144) Cecconi M, Piovani D, Brunetta E, Aghemo A, Greco M, et al. Early predictors of clinical deterioration in a cohort of 239 patients hospitalized for Covid‐19 infection in Lombardy, Italy. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020;9(5):1548.
145) Alkundi A, Mahmoud I, Musa A, Naveed S, Alshawwaf M. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID‐19 hospitalized patients with diabetes in the United Kingdom: a retrospective single centre study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2020;165;108263. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108263]
146) Masetti C, Generali E, Colapietro F, Voza A, Cecconi M, Messina A, et al. High mortality in COVID‐19 patients with mild respiratory disease. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2020;50(9):e13314.
147) Yang Q, Zhou Y, Wang X, Gao S, Xiao Y, Zhang W, et. Effect of hypertension on outcomes of adult inpatients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China: a propensity score‐matching analysis. Respiratory Research 2020;21(1):172.
148) Yu Y, Xu D, Fu S, Zhang J, Yang X, Xu L, et al. Patients with COVID‐19 in 19 ICUs in Wuhan, China: a cross‐sectional study. Critical Care 2020;24(1):219.
149) Obata R, Maeda T, Rizk D, Kuno T. Palliative care team involvement in patients with COVID‐19 in New York City. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care 2020;37(10):869‐72.
150) Li R, Tian J, Yang F, Lv L, Yu J, Sun G, et al. Clinical characteristics of 225 patients with COVID‐19 in a tertiary hospital near Wuhan, China. Journal of Clinical Virology 2020;127:104363 [Epub ahead of print].
151) Deng Y, Liu W, Liu K, Fang YY, Shang J, Zhou L, et al. Clinical characteristics of fatal and recovered cases of coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study. Chinese Medical Journal 2020;133(11):1261‐7.
152) Pelayo J, Lo KB, Bhargav R, Gul F, Peterson E, DeJoy Iii R, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of community‐ and hospital‐acquired acute kidney injury with COVID‐19 in a US inner city hospital system. Cardiorenal Medicine. 2020;10(4):223‐31.
153) Güner R, Hasanoğlu İ, Kayaaslan B, Aypak A, Kaya Kalem A, Eser F, et al. COVID‐19 experience of the major pandemic response center in the capital: results of the pandemic's first month in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2020;50(8);1801‐09. [DOI: 10.3906/sag‐2006‐164]
154) Zhang G, Hu C, Luo L, Fang F, Chen Y, Li J, et al. Clinical features and short‐term outcomes of 221 patients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China. Journal of Clinical Virology 2020;27:104364. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104364]
155) Li Y, Li M, Wang M, Zhou Y, Chang J, Xian Y, et al. Acute cerebrovascular disease following COVID‐19: a single center, retrospective, observational study. Stroke and Vascular Neurology 2020;5(3);279‐84. [DOI: 10.1136/svn‐2020‐000431]
156) Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurology 2020;77(6):683‐90.
157) Yang R, Gui X, Zhang Y, Xiong Y. The role of essential organ‐based comorbidities in the prognosis of COVID‐19 infection patients. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 2020;14(8):835‐8.
158) Gao S, Jiang F, Jin W, Shi Y, Yang L, Xia Y, et al. Risk factors influencing the prognosis of elderly patients infected with COVID‐19: a clinical retrospective study in Wuhan, China. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(13):12504‐16.
159) Li P, Chen L, Liu Z, Pan J, Zhou D, Wang H, et al. Clinical features and short‐term outcomes of elderly patients with COVID‐19. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2020 May 31 [Epub 2020 May 31]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.107]
160) Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Internal Medicine 2020;180(7):934‐43.
161) Pagnesi M, Baldetti L, Beneduce A, Calvo F, Gramegna M, Pazzanese V, et al. Pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular involvement in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19. Heart 2020;106(17):1324‐31.
162) Yang L, Liu J, Zhang R, Li M, Li Z, Zhou X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of 200 hospitalized patients with corona virus disease 2019 outside Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Journal of Clinical Virology 2020;129:104475.
163) Middeldorp S, Coppens M, Van Haaps TF, Foppen M, Vlaar AP, Müller MC, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2020;18(8):1995‐2002.
164) Yan Y, Yang Y, Wang F, Ren H, Zhang S, Shi X, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe covid‐19 with diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care 2020;8(1):e001343.
165) Russo V, Di Maio M, Attena E, Silverio A, Scudiero F, Celentani D, et al. Clinical impact of pre‐admission antithrombotic therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19: a multicenter observational study. Pharmacological Research 2020;159;104965. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104965].
166) Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10229):1054‐62.
167) Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). JAMA Cardiology 2020;5(7):811‐8.
168) Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, Van der Meer NJ, Arbous MS, Gommers DA, Kant KM, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID‐19. Thrombosis Research 2020;191:145‐7.
169) Ni W, Yang X, Liu J, Bao J, Li R, Xu Y, et al. Acute myocardial injury at hospital admission is associated with all‐cause mortality in COVID‐19. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020;76(1):124‐5.
170) Chen D, Li X, Song Q, Hu C, Su F, Dai J, et al. Assessment of hypokalemia and clinical characteristics in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 in Wenzhou, China. JAMA Network Open 2020;3(6):e2011122.
171) Guo W, Li M, Dong Y, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Tian C, et al. Diabetes is a risk factor for the progression and prognosis of COVID‐19. Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews 2020 Mar 31 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3319]
172) Mahévas M, Tran VT, Roumier M, Chabrol A, Paule R, Guillaud C, et al. Clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with covid‐19 pneumonia who require oxygen: observational comparative study using routine care data. BMJ 2020;369:m1844.
173) Si D, Du B, Ni L, Yang B, Sun H, Jiang N, et al. Death, discharge and arrhythmias among patients with COVID‐19 and cardiac injury. CMAJ 2020;192(28):E791‐8.
174) Zhang Y, Li H, Zhang J, Cao Y, Zhao X, Yu N, et al. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with diabetes and secondary hyperglycaemia with coronavirus disease 2019: a single‐centre, retrospective, observational study in Wuhan. Diabetes,Obesity and Metabolism 2020;22(8):1443‐54.
175) Itelman E, Wasserstrum Y, Segev A, Avaky C, Negru L, et al. Clinical characterization of 162 COVID‐19 patients in Israel: preliminary report from a large tertiary center. Israel Medical Association Journal 2020;22(5):271‐4
176) Shi M, Chen L, Yang Y, Zhang J, Xu J, Xu G, et al. Analysis of clinical features and outcomes of 161 patients with severe and critical COVID‐19: a multicenter descriptive study. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 2020;34(9);e23415. [DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23415]
177) Lim JH, Park SH, Jeon Y, Cho JH, Jung HY, Choi JY, et al. Fatal outcomes of COVID‐19 in patients with severe acute kidney injury. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020;9(6):1718.
178) Andrikopoulou M, Madden N, Wen T, Aubey JJ, Aziz A, Baptiste CD, et al. Symptoms and critical illness among obstetric patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020;136(2):291‐9.
179) Zou X, Li S, Fang M, Hu M, Bian Y, Ling J, et al. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score as a predictor of hospital mortality in patients of Coronavirus disease 2019. Critical Care Medicine 2020;48(8):e657‐65.
180) Ren H, Yang Y, Wang F, Yan Y, Shi X, Dong K, et al. Association of the insulin resistance marker TyG index with the severity and mortality of COVID‐19. Cardiovascular Diabetology 2020;19(1):58.
181) Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID‐19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Medicine 2020;46(5):846‐8.
182) Oussalah A, Gleye S, Clerc Urmes I, Laugel E, Callet J, Barbé F, et al. Long‐term ACE inhibitor/ARB use is associated with severe renal dysfunction and acute kidney injury in patients with severe COVID‐19: results from a referral center cohort in the North East of France. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020;71(9);2447‐56. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa677]
183) Chen Q, Zheng Z, Zhang C, Zhang X, Wu H, Wang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 145 patients with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in Taizhou, Zhejiang, China. Infection 2020;48(4):543‐51.
184) Bonetti G, Manelli F, Patroni A, Bettinardi A, Borrelli G, Fiordalisi G, et al. Laboratory predictors of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in the area of Valcamonica, Italy. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2020;58(7):1100‐5.
185) Xie J, Covassin N, Fan Z, Singh P, Gao W, Li G, et al. Association between hypoxemia and mortality in patients with COVID‐19. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2020;95(6):1138‐47.
186) Gavin W, Campbell E, Zaidi SA, Gavin N, Dbeibo L, Beeler C, et al. Clinical characteristics, outcomes and prognosticators in adult patients hospitalized with COVID‐19. American Journal of Infection Control. 2021:49(2);158‐65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.005]
187) Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel Coronavirus‐infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323(11):1061‐9.
188) Liu K, Fang YY, Deng Y, Liu W, Wang MF, Ma JP, et al. Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. Chinese Medical Journal (Engl) 2020;133(9):1025‐31.
189) Yang Q, Xie L, Zhang W, Zhao L, Wu H, Jiang J, et al. Analysis of the clinical characteristics, drug treatments and prognoses of 136 patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2020;45(4):609‐16.
190) Zhang P, He Z, Yu G, Peng D, Feng Y, Ling J, et al. The modified NUTRIC score can be used for nutritional risk assessment as well as prognosis prediction in critically ill COVID‐19 patients. Clinical Nutrition 2021:40(2);534‐41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.051]
191) Koleilat I, Galen B, Choinski K, Hatch AN, Jones DB, Billett H, et al. Clinical characteristics of acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis diagnosed by duplex in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 2021;9(1);36‐46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.06.012]
192) Wan S, Xiang Y, Fang W, Zheng Y, Li B, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features and treatment of COVID‐19 patients in northeast Chongqing. Journal of Medical Virology 2020;92(7):797‐806.
193) Li Y, Han X, Alwalid O, Cui Y, Cao Y, Liu J, et al. Baseline characteristics and risk factors for short‐term outcomes in 132 COVID‐19 patients with diabetes in Wuhan China: a retrospective study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2020 Aug;166:108299 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108299]
194) Sala S, Peretto G, De Luca G, Farina N, Campochiaro C, Tresoldi M, et al. Low prevalence of arrhythmias in clinically stable COVID‐19 patients. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 2020;43(8);891‐3. [DOI: 10.1111/pace.13987].
195) Wang Z, Du Z, Zhu F. Glycosylated hemoglobin is associated with systemic inflammation, hypercoagulability, and prognosis of COVID‐19 patients. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2020;164;108214. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108214].
196) Xiong F, Tang H, Liu L, Tu C, Tian JB, Lei CT, et al. Clinical characteristics of and medical interventions for COVID‐19 in hemodialysis patients in Wuhan, China. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2020;31(7):1387‐97.
197) Wu Y, Hou B, Liu J, Chen Y, Zhong P. Risk factors associated with long‐term hospitalization in patients with COVID‐19: a single‐centered, retrospective study. Frontiers in Medicine 2020;7:315 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00315].
198) Churchill TW, Bertrand PB, Bernard S, Namasivayam M, Churchill J, Crousillat D, et al. Echocardiographic features of COVID‐19 illness and association with cardiac biomarkers. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2020;33(8):1053‐4.
199) Pan F, Yang L, Li Y, Liang B, Li L, Ye T, et al. Factors associated with death outcome in patients with severe coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19): a case‐control study. International Journal of Medical Sciences 2020;17(9):1281‐92.
200) Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, Raverdy V, Noulette J, Duhamel A, et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity 2020;28(7):1195‐9.
201) Luan YY, Liu Y, Liu XY, Yu BJ, Chen RL, Peng M, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) associated coagulopathy and its impact on outcomes in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study. Thrombosis Research 2020;195:62‐8.
202) Yang A, Qiu Q, Kong X, Sun Y, Chen T, Zuo Y, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of COVID‐19 patients in Chongqing China. Frontiers in Public Health 2020;8;244. [DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00244]
203) Shang Y, Liu T, Wei Y, Li J, Shao L, Liu M, et al. Scoring systems for predicting mortality for severe patients with COVID‐19. EClinicalMedicine 2020;24:100426 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100426]
204) Selçuk M, Çınar T, Keskin M, Çiçek V, Kılıç Ş, Kenan B, et al. Is the use of ACE inb/ARBs associated with higher in‐hospital mortality in Covid‐19 pneumonia patients? Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 2020;42(8):738‐42.
205) Deng Q, Hu B, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhou X, Hu W, et al. Suspected myocardial injury in patients with COVID‐19: evidence from front‐line clinical observation in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Cardiology 2020;311:116‐21.
206) Zhang J, Yu M, Tong S, Liu LY, Tang LV. Predictive factors for disease progression in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Journal of Clinical Virology 2020;127;104392. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104392]
207) Quartuccio L, Sonaglia A, McGonagle D, Fabris M, Peghin M, Pecori D, et al. Profiling COVID‐19 pneumonia progressing into the cytokine storm syndrome: results from a single Italian centre study on tocilizumab versus standard of care. Journal of Clinical Virology 2020;129;104444. [DOIi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104444]
208) Sud K, Vogel B, Bohra C, Garg V, Talebi S, Lerakis S, et al. Echocardiographic findings in patients with COVID‐19 with significant myocardial injury. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2020;33(8):1054‐5.
209) Zhou X, Zhu J, Xu T. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients with hypertension on renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 2020;42(7):656‐60.
210) Du RH, Liu LM, Yin W, Wang W, Guan LL, Yuan ML, et al. Hospitalization and critical care of 109 decedents with COVID‐19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2020;17(7):839‐46.
211) Yao Q, Wang P, Wang X, Qie G, Meng M, Tong X, et al. A retrospective study of risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in hospitalized adult patients. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine 2020;130(5):390‐9.
212) Escalera‐Antezana JP, Lizon‐Ferrufino NF, Maldonado‐Alanoca A, Alarcon‐De‐la‐Vega G, Alvarado‐Arnez LE, Balderrama‐Saavedra MA, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in Bolivia: an analysis of the first 107 confirmed cases. Le Infezioni in Medicina 2020;28(2):238‐42.
213) Wang D, Yin Y, Hu C, Liu X, Zhang X, Zhou S, et al. Clinical course and outcome of 107 patients infected with the novel coronavirus, SARS‐CoV‐2, discharged from two hospitals in Wuhan, China. Critical Care 2020;24(1):188.
214) Argulian E, Sud K, Vogel B, Bohra C, Garg VP, Talebi S, et al. Right ventricular dilation in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 infection. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging 2020;13(11);2459‐61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.010]
215) Hsia BC, Greige N, Quiroz JA, Khokhar AS, Daily J, Di Biase L, et al. QT prolongation in a diverse, urban population of COVID‐19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, or azithromycin. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2020;59(2);337‐45. [DOI: 10.1007/s10840‐020‐00822‐x]
216) Zou X, Fang M, Li S, Wu L, Gao B, Gao H, et al. Characteristics of liver function in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 and chronic HBV coinfection. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2020:19(3);597‐603.
217) Buckner FS, McCulloch DJ, Atluri V, Blain M, McGuffin SA, Nalla AK, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of 105 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 in Seattle, Washington. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2020;71(16);2167‐73. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa632]
218) Xie S, Zhang G, Yu H, Wang J, Wang S, Tang G, et al. The epidemiologic and clinical features of suspected and confirmed cases of imported 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in north Shanghai, China. Annals of Translational Medicine 2020;8(10):637.
219) Marone EM, Bonalumi G, Curci R, Arzini A, Chierico S, Marazzi G, et al. Characteristics of venous thromboembolism in COVID‐19 patients: a multicenter experience from Northern Italy. Annals of Vascular Surgery 2020;68;83‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.07.007]
220) Guo T, Shen Q, Guo W, He W, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with COVID‐19 in Hunan Province, China: a multicenter, retrospective study. Gerontology 2020;66(5):467‐75.
221) Hu H, Yao N, Qiu Y. Comparing rapid scoring systems in mortality prediction of critically ill patients with novel Coronavirus disease. Academic Emergency Medicine 2020;27(6):461‐8.
222) Hwang JM, Kim JH, Park JS, Chang MC, Park D. Neurological diseases as mortality predictive factors for patients with COVID‐19: a retrospective cohort study. Neurological Sciences 2020;41(9):2317‐24.
223) Zhu Y, Du Z, Zhu Y, Li W, Miao H, Li Z. Evaluation of organ function in patients with severe COVID‐19 infections. Medicina Clinica 2020;155(5):191‐6.
224) Wu J, Li J, Zhu G, Zhang Y, Bi Z, Yu Y, et al. Clinical features of maintenance hemodialysis patients with 2019 novel Coronavirus‐infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2020;15(8):1139‐45.
225) Duanmu Y, Brown IP, Gibb WR, Singh J, Matheson LW, Blomkalns AL, et al. Characteristics of emergency department patients with COVID‐19 at a single site in Northern California: clinical observations and public health implications. Academic Emergency Medicine 2020;27(6):505‐9.
226) Moriconi D, Masi S, Rebelos E, Virdis A, Manca ML, De Marco S, et al. Obesity prolongs the hospital stay in patients affected by COVID‐19, and may impact on SARS‐COV‐2 shedding. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice 2020;14(3):205‐9.
227) Pulla P. What counts as a covid‐19 death? BMJ 2020;370;m2859. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2859]
228) Mesnier J, Cottin Y, Coste P, Ferrari E, Schiele F, Lemesle G, et al. Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after lockdown according to regional prevalence of COVID‐19 and patient profile in France: a registry study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5(10):e536‐42.
229) Baldi E, Sechi GM, Mare C, Canevari F, Brancaglione A, Primi R, et al. COVID‐19 kills at home: the close relationship between the epidemic and the increase of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrests. European Heart Journal 2020;41(32):3045‐54.
230) Jaffe AS, Cleland JG, Katus HA. Myocardial injury in severe COVID‐19 infection. European Heart Journal 2020;41(22):2080‐2.
231) Liao SC, Shao SC, Cheng CW, Chen YC, Hung MJ. Incidence rate and clinical impacts of arrhythmia following COVID‐19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 17,435 patients. Critical Care 2020;24(1):690.
232)Jiménez D, García‐Sanchez A, Rali P, Muriel A, Bikdeli B, Ruiz‐Artacho P, et al. Incidence of VTE and bleeding among hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Chest 2020;S0012‐3692(20)35146‐1.
233) Fu L, Liu X, Su Y, Ma J, Hong K. Prevalence and impact of cardiac injury on COVID‐19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Cardiology 2021;44(2);276‐83 doi: 10.1002/clc.23540. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33382482
234) Basso C, Leone O, Rizzo S, De Gaspari M,Vvan der Wal AC, Aubry MC, et al. Pathological features of COVID‐19‐associated myocardial injury: a multicentre cardiovascular pathology study. European Heart Journal 2020;41(39):3827‐35.
235) Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M, Haverich A, Welte T, Laenger F, et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid‐19. New England Journal of Medicine 2020;383(2):120‐8.
236) Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID‐19. Lancet 2020;395(10234):1417‐8.
237) Patel BV, Arachchillage DJ, Ridge CA, Bianchi P, Doyle JF, Garfield B, et al. Pulmonary angiopathy in severe COVID‐19: physiologic, imaging, and hematologic observations. American Journal Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2020 Sep 1;202(5):690‐9.
238) Mangion K, Morrow A, Bagot C, Bayes H, Blyth KG, Church C, et al. The chief scientist office cardiovascular and pulmonary imaging in SARS Coronavirus disease‐19 (CISCO‐19) study. Cardiovascular Research 2020;116(14);2185‐96. [DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa209]
239) Berbudi A, Rahmadika N, Tjahjadi AI, Ruslami R. Type 2 diabetes and its impact on the immune system. Current Diabetes Reviews 2020;16(5):442‐9.
240) Corrales‐Medina VF, Suh KN, Rose G, Chirinos JA, Doucette S, Cameron DW, et al. Cardiac complications in patients with community‐acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. PLOS Medicine 2011;8(6):e1001048.
241) Smeeth L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ, Hubbard R, Farrington P, Vallance P. Risk of myocardial infarction and stroke after acute infection or vaccination. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351(25):2611‐8.
242) Dherange P, Lang J, Qian P, Oberfeld B, Sauer WH, Koplan B, et al. Arrhythmias and COVID‐19: a review. JACC Clinical Electrophysiology 2020;6(9):1193‐204.
243) Pellicori P. At the heart of COVID‐19. European Heart Journal 2020;41(19):1830‐2.
244) Grimaud M, Starck J, Levy M, Marais C, Chareyre J, Khraiche D, et al. Acute myocarditis and multisystem inflammatory emerging disease following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in critically ill children. Annals of Intensive Care 2020;10(1):69.
245) Wenzel P, Kopp S, Göbel S, Jansen T, Geyer M, Hahn F, et al. Evidence of SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA in endomyocardial biopsies of patients with clinically suspected myocarditis tested negative for COVID‐19 in nasopharyngeal swab. Cardiovascular Research 2020;116(10):1661‐3.
246) Dolhnikoff M, Ferreira Ferranti J, De Almeida Monteiro RA, Duarte‐Neto AN, Soares Gomes‐Gouvêa M, Viu Degaspare N, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 in cardiac tissue of a child with COVID‐19‐related multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Lancet Child and Adolescent Health 2020;4(10):790‐4.
247) Landesberg G, Gilon D, Meroz Y, Georgieva M, Levin PD, Goodman S, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock. European Heart Journal 2012;33(7):895‐903.
248) Kaplan D, Casper TC, Elliott CG, Men S, Pendleton RC, Kraiss LW, et al. VTE incidence and risk factors in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest 2015;148(5):1224‐30.
249) Shao IY, Elkind MS, Boehme AK. Risk factors for stroke in patients with sepsis and bloodstream infections. Stroke 2019;50(5):1046‐51.
250) Dalager‐Pedersen M, Søgaard M, Schønheyder HC, Nielsen H, Thomsen RW. Risk for myocardial infarction and stroke after community‐acquired bacteremia: a 20‐year population‐based cohort study. Circulation 2014;129(13):1387‐96.
251) Frencken JF, Van Baal L, Kappen TH, Donker DW, Horn J, Van der Poll T, et al. Myocardial injury in critically ill patients with community‐acquired pneumonia. A cohort study. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2019;16(5):606‐12.
252) Cangemi R, Casciaro M, Rossi E, Calvieri C, Bucci T, Calabrese CM, et al. Platelet activation is associated with myocardial infarction in patients with pneumonia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014;64(18):1917‐25.
253) Shahreyar M, Fahhoum R, Akinseye O, Bhandari S, Dang G, Khouzam RN. Severe sepsis and cardiac arrhythmias. Annals of Translational Medicine 2018;6(1):6.
254) Corrales‐Medina VF, Taljaard M, Yende S, Kronmal R, Dwivedi G, Newman AB, et al. Intermediate and long‐term risk of new‐onset heart failure after hospitalization for pneumonia in elderly adults. American Heart Journal 2015;170(2):306‐12.
255) Ou SM, Chu H, Chao PW, Lee YJ, Kuo SC, Chen TJ, et al. Long‐term mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in sepsis survivors. A nationwide population‐based study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2016;194(2):209‐17.
256) Caulley L, Catalá‐López F, Whelan J, Khoury M, Ferraro J, Cheng W, Husereau D, Altman DG, Moher D. Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:87‐94.
Differences between protocol and review
Due to the large number of papers, two review authors, from a pool of five (KSL, PP, GD, CW, KM) independently reviewed titles and abstracts to determine their eligibility. A second review author checked 100% (and not 20%, as stated in the protocol) of excluded records.
A second review author checked 100% (and not 20%, as stated in the protocol) of extracted data.
Four review authors (KSL, GD, CW, and KM) independently assessed the quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies and the JBI checklist for case series, respectively.
Due to the large amount of articles identified and the substantial amount of time required to conduct this review, we decided not to screen for additional publications in references and did not contact authors to request additional details if they were not reported in the main publication.
During peer‐review, editors suggested removing raised ferritin from the outcomes of interest, as they felt that elevated ferritin was not a cardiovascular complication of COVID‐19.
We excluded manuscripts enrolling only paediatric (< 18 years) participants.
Contributions of authors
PP and JGFC drafted the protocol, which was critically revised and approved by all authors, and coordinated the review. Five authors (KSL, PP, GD, CW, KM) reviewed titles and abstracts to determine their eligibility, and extracted data. KSL, GD, CW, and KM assessed the quality of the studies. PP and JGFC drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Sources of support
Internal sources
No sources of support provided
External sources
-
This project was supported by the NIHR via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Heart Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health and Social Care, UK
NIHR
Declarations of interest
PP declares no conflicts of interest.
GD declares no conflicts of interest.
CMW declares no conflicts of interest.
KSL declares no conflicts of interest.
KM declares grants to the institution from Chief Scientist Office, EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account (IAA) and Wellcome ISSF COVID Response Fund for research on COVID‐19. KM is involved in clinical duties involving patients with COVID‐19 and potential cardiovascular complications at NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
MA declares no conflicts of interest.
CB declares grants to the institution from the Chief Scientist Office for research on COVID‐19. CB treats patients with COVID‐19 at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK. CB also declares involvement in eligible studies for this review.
IS declares no conflicts of interest.
PDL declares no conflicts of interest.
AL has received speaker, advisory board or consultancy fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Servier, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda, Roche, Janssens‐Cilag Ltd, Clinigen Group, Eli Lily, Eisai Ltd, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Akcea Therapeutics, Myocardial Solutions, iOWNA Health and Heartfelt Technologies Ltd. AL works as a Honorary Consultant Cardiologist for the Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital NHS Trust.
AMcC declares no conflicts of interest.
RST declares no conflicts of interest.
JGFC declares funds to the institution from Vifor, Pharmacosmos, Ergofigure, Viscardia, Innolife, Pharmanord, Bayer; funds fore lecturers received by JGFC from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Servier, Vifor. JGFC also contributes to advisory boards of Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Servier, Vifor and has received funds via the instititution for participating on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Idorsia.
Edited (no change to conclusions)
