Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 27;16(4):e0250246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250246

Factors associated with iron deficiency anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Ashanti Region, Ghana: A hospital-based prospective cohort study

Reginald Adjetey Annan 1,*, Linda Afriyie Gyimah 1,#, Charles Apprey 1,#, Anthony Kwaku Edusei 2,#, Odeafo Asamoah-Boakye 1,#, Linda Nana Esi Aduku 1,, Wisdom Azanu 3,, Herman E Lutterodt 4,
Editor: Leeberk Raja5
PMCID: PMC8078754  PMID: 33905433

Abstract

Background

Iron Deficiency Anaemia (IDA) is reportedly high in pregnant adults and the causes well studied. However, among pregnant teenagers, the levels and associated factors of IDA are not fully understood.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study among Ghanaian pregnant teenagers, aged 13–19 years, IDA prevalence and associated factors were investigated. Sociodemographic data, household hunger scale (HHS), lived poverty index (LPI), FAO’s women’s dietary diversity score (WDDS) and interventions received during antenatal care (ANC) were obtained from 416 pregnant teenagers in Ashanti Region, Ghana. Micronutrient intakes using a repeated 24-hour dietary recall, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) were determined and blood samples analysed for haemoglobin (Hb), serum levels of ferritin, prealbumin, vitamin A, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP).

Results

Anaemia (Hb cutoff <11.0 g/dL) was 57.1%; deficient systemic supply of iron stores (31.4%), depleted body stores of iron (4.4%), inadequate dietary iron intake (94.5%), and inadequate multiple micronutrient intakes (49.5%), were all notable among study participants. Between-subject effects using Generalized Linear Modelling indicated malaria tablet given at ANC (p = 0.035), MUAC (p = 0.043), ZPP (p<0.001), ZPP/Hb ratio (p<0.001) and depleted body iron stores (DBIS) (p<0.001) to significantly affect Hb levels. Pregnant teenagers with a high ZPP/Hb ratio (OR = 9.7, p<0.001, 95%CI = 6.0–15.8) had increased odds of being anaemic compared to those with normal ZPP/Hb ratio. Participants who were wasted (OR = 1.2, p = 0.543, 95%CI = 0.6–2.3), and those with depleted iron stores (OR = 3.0, p = 0.167, 95%CI = 0.6–14.6) had increased odds of being anaemic. Participants who experienced hunger were close to 3 times more likely (OR = 2.9, p = 0.040, 95%CI = 1.1–7.8) for depleted iron stores, compared to those who did not experience hunger. Also, participants with inadequate multiple micronutrients intakes (OR = 2.6, p = 0.102, 95%CI = 0.8–8.4), and those with low serum levels of ferritin (OR = 3.3, p = 0.291, 95%CI = 0.4–29.2) had increased odds of depleted body iron stores.

Conclusions

IDA is common among pregnant teenagers and the related factors include malaria tablets given at ANC, maternal hunger, maternal MUAC, a deficient systemic supply of iron, depleted body iron stores, ZPP, and ZPP/Hb ratio. Appropriate interventions are urgently needed to address the causes of IDA among pregnant teenagers.

Introduction

Adolescence, a critical period of physical growth, early learning, and mental developmental changes have gained public interest and is being seen as a life state suited for strategic health policies and commitments [1,2]. Ghana has a youthful population, with the adolescent age group comprising about 22.0% of the total population [3]. Of all the health problems faced by adolescents, teenage pregnancy is arguable the most devastating due to its negative consequences on the health of the mother and infant [2]. Globally, it is estimated that 12 million girls aged 15–19 years have a child annually, and at least 770,000 of these childbirth takes place in developing countries [4]. The current Ghana demographic health survey shows that 14% of girls aged between 15 and 19 years had begun childbearing, with 11% live birth rate [5]. It is also known that early pregnancy and postnatal complications such as unsafe abortion, stillbirth, and pregnancy-induced hypertension are the main causes of mortality among girls aged 15–19 years old worldwide [68]. Iron deficiency anaemia is also a common complication that increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as low birth weight, preterm birth, perinatal and infant mortality, postpartum haemorrhage, and spontaneous abortion [9,10]. This implies that pregnant adolescent girls face a double burden of health risk because they have increased nutrients demand to ensure their own growth/development, in addition to that of their growing fetuses. Consequently, the UN’s Sustainable Development Agenda on reducing poverty and hunger, promoting healthy lives and wellbeing at all ages, empowering women, and achieving equal education may not be attained if certain capacities of the adolescents are not developed [11].

Maternal anaemia has been a long-standing interest in the public health domain [12]. Among all the pathological causes of anaemia in pregnancy, iron deficiency anaemia is the most frequent, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), where the contribution from other anaemia disorders such as malaria and sickle cell disease are less significant [1214]. Maternal anaemia occurs when the haemoglobin concentration is less than 11.0g/dL, while in the absence of inflammation, ferritin concentration less than 15 ug/L is also used to determine iron-deficiency anaemia [15]. According to WHO, more than 40 percent of maternal women globally are anaemic due to iron deficiency [16], and/or folate and other micronutrient deficiencies [17,18]. Among the many health interventions including antenatal and postnatal maternal care services, the Community-based Health Planning and Services initiatives in poorly resourced communities, and iron-folic acid supplementation given to pregnant women to reduce the burden of anaemia [19], Ghana is still reporting a high prevalence of anaemia (45.1%) among pregnant women aged 15–49 [20]. A recent retrospective study by Ampiah et al. [21] also reported a very high prevalence of anaemia among adults and teenage pregnant women, higher among teenagers, and not much reduced over five years.

There are two forms of iron deficiency; absolute and functional. Absolute iron deficiency occurs as a result of low or depleted body stores of iron while, functional iron deficiency is a disorder that occurs when total body stores are normal or increased, but the iron supply to the bone marrow is deficient [22,23]. The two forms can coexist in pregnancy when risk factors are present [23]. The known causes of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnant women have been poor dietary intake as a result of food deprivation, consumption of less diverse foods, leading to poor nutritional status, and low iron stores, and therefore anaemia [2427]. During pregnancy, there is an additional requirement for iron and folic acid to meet the pregnant woman’s own nutritional needs as well as those of the developing foetus [16]. This is more so for the adolescent, who require nutrients for growth and development spurt experienced during this age as well. The reasons for the perpetual high anaemia prevalence are not obvious, but possibly, the underlying factors have not been fully investigated or understood. Researchers on anaemia have focused on adult pregnant women, and research interest into risk factors focused on related-causes such as; intestinal parasitic infections [28], malaria, HIV infections [29,30], sickle cell anaemia [31]. Other studies in Ghana have shown that multiparity, maternal underweight [32], poor knowledge about anaemia [33], malaria infection, no fish/meat consumption during pregnancy [34] are all predicting factors of anaemia among pregnant women that affect pregnancy outcomes.

Evidence from the above literature concludes that maternal anaemia has multifactorial causes, that negatively affect maternal and birth outcomes, but these are understudied among pregnant teenagers. The interactive effects of both immediate and underlying causes of anaemia: socio-demographic, antenatal intervention uptake, poverty and hunger, dietary factors, anthropometric and nutritional status on anaemia among Ghanaian pregnant teenagers are not known. Our study sought to investigate these factors to deepen our understanding of the determinants of anaemia during pregnancy.

Methods

Study setting

Teenage pregnant girls were recruited from 29 communities in Kumasi Metropolis, Asante Akim Central, Ejisu Juaben, Bosomtwi, Asante Akim South and North and Ahafo Ano North and South Districts, all in Ashanti Region, Ghana, from May to August 2018. Ashanti Region has an estimated population of 5,792,187, accounting for 19% of Ghana’s total population in 2019 [35]. The report from the Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2017 showed a high prevalence of teenage pregnancy (12.2%) and anaemia in the region [36]. The study areas have hospitals, health centres, or Community-based Health Planning Services (CHPS) compounds. The study population consisted of pregnant teenagers (aged 13 to 19 years old) with gestational age up to 32 gestational weeks, who were attending antenatal clinics at their district health facilities.

Study design

The study is an excerpt from a hospital-based prospective cohort study, involving 416 pregnant teenagers, aged 13 to 19 years old, residing in the 29 communities. The main study recruited and collected baseline data on pregnant teenagers. They were subsequently followed and birth outcomes evaluated upon delivery. The current study focuses on the baseline characteristics of the participants.

Sample size calculation

This study is part of the larger longitudinal study which obtained birth outcome information of pregnant teenagers. Thus, the sample size used in this study was calculated from the larger study. Low birth weight was the main outcome in the larger study and was used in calculating the sample size. The sample size was calculated using the formula from Charan and Biswas study [37]:

n=2(Zα/2+Zβ)2p(1p)/(P1P2)^2.

Where, n = sample size, Z α/2 = 1.96 at type 1 error of 5%, Z β = 0.84 at 80% power, P1 = LBW in pregnant adolescents with adequate nutritional status (11.6%), P2 = LBW in pregnant adolescents with poor nutritional status (23.3%), p1-p2 = difference in prevalence of low birth weight between pregnant adolescents with adequate nutritional status at birth and those with inadequate nutritional status, and p = pooled prevalence = (p1 +p2)/2. A pilot study among pregnant adolescents in the area reported LBW prevalence of 23.3% [38]. Hence, we proposed that LBW in pregnant adolescents with adequate nutritional status would be 11.4%, while those with poor nutritional status would remain 23.3%, a reduction of just above half (51.1%). Hence, p1 = 11.4%, p2 = 23.3%, their proportions being p1 = 0.114 and p2 = 0.233, and p = (0.114 +0.233)/2 = 0.1735.

Using the above descriptive, the sample size n = 2(1.96+0.84) 2 x 0.1735(1–0.233)/(0.114–0.233) 2, n = 2.09/0.01, equal 209 was calculated, which implied we needed to recruit 209 participants in each arm of the study (half in the poorly nourished group and a half in the well-nourished group) making 418 participants showing a significant association between poor nutrition and LBW. However, we added 10% attrition to give 460 participants who were needed. However, the study had 416 participants.

Data sampling

A convenience sampling method using a first come first served approach was used in recruiting participants from hospitals, health centres, and CHPS zones during antenatal care visits. The inclusion criteria were that the pregnant teenagers were within the ages 13–19 years old, and also resided in the selected communities where the health centres/hospitals visited served. We obtained days in which antenatal clinics were held for pregnant adolescents in the hospitals/health centres involved in this study. On these dates, research assistants visited the hospitals/health centres, and any pregnant teenager within the required age group (13–19 years) was eligible for recruitment. Although special antenatal clinics were held for teenagers, attendance was low due to stigma in the rural districts. Hence, community information centres were asked to announce and invite all pregnant adolescents to the health centres. Those that came and consented to the study were recruited.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Ghana (Reference: CHPRE/AP/236/18). Study protocols/aims were first explained to all participants in their local language (Asante Twi). Written and signed informed consent was obtained from all participants by following CSIR protocols for recruiting for the study. Also, parents/guardians of the teenagers gave consent on behalf of participants less than 18 years old.

Data collection

Data were collected on socio-demographic variables, dietary diversity, availability of food and poverty, and dietary intake. Anthropometric measurements were done and blood samples collected for haematology and biochemical analysis. Antenatal interventions uptake and other pregnancy-related practices were collected with a structured questionnaire. Data on age and parity were verified from their National Health Insurance Identification cards and maternal health record books of participants. A two-day training workshop was undertaken by the research team to train all enumerators on each data collection tool. A day field pre-testing session followed the training in a nearby community health centre. These trained enumerators carried out all data collection for this study at the health centres/hospitals. The trained enumerators consisted of MPhil Human Nutrition and Dietetics students, Phlebotomists and other field research assistants.

Dietary assessment

A repeated 24-hour dietary recall on 2 weekdays and 1 weekend were used to obtain dietary intake of the participants, beginning from the previous day’s dietary intake. All dietary recalls were done by face-to-face interviews by the trained Human Nutrition and Dietetics students, to cover intake for three days, including a weekend during the clinic visit. Household food measures were used to quantify food and beverages consumed by pregnant teenagers, and the portions in household measures were later converted into grams equivalents. The trained MPhil Human Nutrition students computed the grams of the food and beverages consumed by participants into a nutrient analysis Microsoft Excel software designed by the University of Ghana, Department of Food Science and Nutrition [39] which contains macro-and-micronutrients levels of Ghanaian foods. We compared the mean micronutrients obtained to the estimated average requirement (EAR) for pregnant women using the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences cut-offs [40]. We considered micronutrient intakes below the EAR as “inadequate” and intakes equal to or above the EAR as “adequate” [40].

Besides, we also determined participants who had combined adequacies/inadequacies for iron, folate, and vitamin B12 when compared with the EAR, and this was reported as multiple micronutrient intake (MMI). Participants who had three inadequate intakes for iron, folate, and vitamin B12 were termed as inadequate multiple micronutrient intake (IMMI), inadequate for both iron-folate was classified as inadequate iron-folate intake, and inadequate for both iron-vitamin B12 was termed as inadequate iron-vitamin B12 intake.

Dietary diversity was assessed using a repeated 24-hour dietary recall method, taken for three days (two weekdays and one weekend). FAO’s WDDS was then used to assess the dietary diversity of participants [41]. The WDDS consisted of ten (10) food groups, namely; grains, white roots and tubers, plantain; pulses (beans, pea, lentils); nuts and seeds; dairy; meat, poultry, and fish; eggs; dark green leafy vegetables; other vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; other vegetables; other fruits [41]. We used the first 24-hour recall from each participant to score her dietary diversity using the 10 food groups. The WDDS was then classified as low (≤ 3), medium (4–5 food groups), or high (≥ 6 food groups) according to FAO’s guidelines [42]. The WDDS was further regrouped into adequate (5–9) and inadequate (0–4) dietary diversity scores to help with the statistical association for the population.

Household hunger and poverty status assessment

The Household Hunger Scale designed by Ballard [43], was adopted to assess food availability and deprivation of pregnant teenagers while the Lived Poverty Index designed by Mattes [44] determining poverty status. The HHS assesses questions related to food availability and deprivation over the past month. The responses to these questions are coded and scored, ranging from 0–6. Scores less than 2 shows little or no hunger, 2–3 shows moderate hunger, and 4–6 shows severe hunger [43]. The LPI assessed questions related to the availability of food, water, cash income, medical care, and cooking fuel over the past year. The responses are scored on a five-point scale, ranging from 0 (which can be thought of as no lived poverty) to 4 which reflects a constant absence of all primary necessities [44]. The averages of the scores were classified as low (0–0.5), low-moderate (0.51–1.0), high-moderate (1.1–1.5) and high (> 1.5) LPI.

Assessment of anthropometric status

The mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) of participants was determined during the clinic visit. MUAC measurement was carried out by the trained enumerators who followed the recommended World Health Organization standard protocol. MUAC measurement was determined as a proxy indicator of maternal weight status since it has good specificity in determining weight during pregnancy [45,46]. An inelastic tape measure (Goldmoon body tape measure, Jiangsu, JS, China) was used to take MUAC of participants by locating the midpoint between the acromion and olecranon bone on the left hand of participants. MUAC measurement less than 22.0cm was referred to as severe wasting, 22.0cm to less than 24.0cm as mild/moderate wasting, and 24.0cm and above as normal MUAC [47]. MUAC assessment was measured twice and the average was used.

Determination of haemoglobin (Hb) levels

The trained phlebotomists took all blood samples at the health centres/hospitals, and samples were transported on dry ice to Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Clinical Analysis Laboratory (CAnLab), Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology for all the biochemical analyses. Two millilitres of venous blood sample of participants were collected into anticoagulant Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and used to determine haemoglobin levels of participants using Sysmex Haematology system (XP-300 Automated Hematology Analyzer, Rhode Island, RI, USA). The WHO cut-off for Hb was used to determine anaemia prevalence among the participants; haemoglobin values less than 11.0g/dL means anaemia, 11.0g/dL and above means no anaemia [15].

Assessment of serum nutrients

All the serum nutrients were analysed following standardized laboratory protocols and performed by trained laboratory scientists. Serum ferritin is the main body storage of iron and is recommended by WHO in the assessment of iron levels, in the absence of inflammation [48,49]. However, serum ferritin is likely to be high (above 200 μg/L)) in the presence of inflammation or infection [49]. Thus, an inflammatory marker, CRP, was also assessed. In this study, ferritin levels were less than 200μg/L for all the participants, depicting no likelihood of inflammation or infection. Five millilitres venous blood taken from participants into serum gel separator tubes were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain the serum. The serum was used for the analysis of serum ferritin, prealbumin, c-reactive protein, total antioxidant capacity and zinc protoporphyrin using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique (from R&D system Inc, USA) at the Clinical Analysis Laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. The optical density for serum ferritin, serum prealbumin, and serum ZPP was taken at 450 nm wavelength within 15 minutes, using a multipurpose microplate ELISA reader (Mindray MR-96A, Guangdong, China). TAC was determined using the ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) assay protocol described by Benzie and Strain [50]. TAC was measured at wavelength 593nm, with the help of a spectrophotometer (Mindray BA-88A, China). The standard curves of known concentrations of the respective recombinant value were used for the calculation of biochemical variables. All biochemical analyses were done in duplicates. Serum iron deficiency was termed as serum ferritin less than 15 μg/L [51]. Low serum prealbumin was defined as serum levels of less than 50–500 mg/L [52]. Serum CRP levels higher than 5–20 mg/L was termed high CRP [53]. ZPP values were measured as μg/dL and converted to μmol/mol heme (ZPP/Hb ratio) by calculating the following formula used by Stanton et al. [54] and Yu [55].

ZPP/Hbratio=μmolofZPPmolofhaemoglobin=μgofZPPgramofHb×25.8

Deficient systemic iron supply was defined as ZPP/Hb ratio greater than 80 μmol/mol heme, ZPP/Hb ratio between 60–80 μmol/mol heme was termed moderate-high, and less than 60 μmol/mol heme means adequate systemic iron supply [56]. Depleted body iron stores were defined as participants with ZPP/Hb ratio greater than 80 μmol/mol heme, and serum ferritin less than 20μg/L [56].

Data analysis

All data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25 (SPSS IBM Inc Chicago, USA). Absolute and relative frequencies were determined for sociodemography, hunger status, poverty status, dietary diversity, antenatal intervention uptake, micronutrient intakes, anthropometric, haemoglobin level, and biochemical variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality was performed to determine whether all continuous variables met parametric assumptions. A chi-square (Fisher’s exact test) cross-tabulation was performed to compare frequencies of hunger status, poverty status, women’s dietary diversity score, antenatal intervention uptake, micronutrient intakes, anthropometric, haemoglobin level, biochemical variables, and iron deficiency anaemia status. An independent t-test and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Generalized Linear Model test) were used for parametric comparisons, while Mann Whitney ‘U’ test was performed for non-parametric comparisons of all continuous variables. The mean (±Standard error mean) difference for the continuous variable; serum ferritin and prealbumin were compared by iron deficiency anaemia status, while the median(interquartile) differences for HHS, LPI, WDDS, MUAC and other biochemical variables were compared by iron deficiency anaemia status. Univariate tests of variables associations were performed using the generalized linear model test to determine the combined effect of study variables on haemoglobin level. Study variables that were significant at Chi-square/ANOVA analysis were put into the Binary logistic regression model to determine predictors of iron deficiency anaemia. All tests were 2-tailed, and p-values < 0.05 were termed significant.

Results

Fig 1 indicates the prevalence of iron-deficiency anaemia among pregnant teenagers. Anaemia prevalence by haemoglobin status was 57.1%, and 31.4% of the participants had a poor systemic supply of body iron stores. Additionally, 4.4% of the pregnant teenagers were depleted of body stores of iron. In terms of dietary iron deficiency anaemia, 94.5%, of the participants had dietary intake below the EAR, while 82.5% and 54.3% of participants had combined dietary inadequate intakes for iron-folate, and iron-vitamin B12, respectively. Also, 49.5% of the pregnant teenagerss had inadequate multiple micronutrient intakes (iron-folate-vitamin B12 deficiencies) when compared with the EAR.

Fig 1. Iron-deficiency anaemia prevalence among pregnant teenagers.

Fig 1

S1 Table shows the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and anaemia prevalence. Anaemia prevalence did not significantly vary by sociodemographic factors (p>0.05). However, more rural (60.9%) than urban (54.4%) pregnant teenagers were anaemic (p = 0.222), older pregnant teenagers (16–19 years) were more anaemic than their younger (13–15 years) counterparts (57.6% versus 51.6%, p = 0.573), and the unmarried (59.4%) were more anaemic than the married participants (50.0%, p = 0.103).

Table 1 presents the relationship between iron deficiency status, and household hunger scale, lived poverty, intervention received at ANC, and micronutrient intakes. Over 8 in 10 pregnant teenagers (82.4%) with depleted body iron stores had inadequate women’s dietary diversity score (WDDS) compared with less than 6 in 10 among those with normal body iron stores (57.4%, p = 0.046). Also, severe hunger was suffered by more pregnant teenagers with depleted iron store (29.2%), than those with normal body iron stores (11%, p = 0.029).

Table 1. Iron deficiency status, and household hunger scale, lived poverty index, intervention received at ANC, and micronutrient intakes.

Variables Total Hb status X2, (P value) Body iron stores X2, (P value)
Anaemia No anaemia Depleted Normal
HHS
No Hunger 303 (72.8) 164(70.7) 134(77.0) 2.34(0.310)¥ 8(47.1) 276(74.2) 7.10(0.029)ǂ
Moderate Hunger 63 (15.1) 37(15.9) 24(13.8) 4(23.5) 55(14.8)
Severe Hunger 50 (12.0) 31(13.4) 16(9.2) 5(29.4) 41(11.0)
Median(IQR) HHS 0(2.0) 0(2.0) 0(1.0) 0.360 2(4.0) 0(2.0) 0.192
Lived Poverty Index(LPI)
Low Moderate 194 (45.2) 107(46.1) 82(47.1) 2.29(0.318)¥ 6(35.3) 174(46.8) 0.91(0.633)ǂ
High Moderate 75 (18.3) 38(16.4) 37(21.3) 4(23.5) 66(17.7)
High 152 (36.5) 87(37.5) 55(31.6) 7(41.2) 132(35.5)
Median(IQR) LPI 1.2(0.8) 1.4(1.0) 1(0.6) 0.118 1.6(1.4) 1.2(0.8) 0.597
WDDS
Inadequate 247 (59.4) 142(61.2) 98(56.3) 0.98(0.359)ǂ 14(82.4) 214(57.5) 4.13(0.046)ǂ
Adequate 169 (40.6) 90(38.8) 76(43.7) 3(17.6) 158(42.5)
Median(IQR) WDDS 4(2.0) 4(2.0) 4(1.0) 0.943 4(1.0) 4(2.0) 0.075
Take MS
Yes 216(51.9) 118(50.9) 93(53.4) 0.26(0.617)ǂ 10(58.8) 191(51.3) 0.36(0.625)ǂ
No 200(48.1) 114(49.1) 81(46.6) 7(41.2) 181(48.7)
Take Malaria Tablet
Yes 168(40.4) 97(41.8) 68(39.1) 0.30(0.610)ǂ 9(52.9) 147(39.5) 1.22(0.315)ǂ
No 248(59.6) 135(58.2) 106(60.9) 8(47.1) 225(60.5)
Dietary Micronutrients
Dietary Iron, 23/22mg/d
Inadequate 393(94.5) 220(94.8) 163(93.7) 0.24(0.668)ǂ 17(100.0) 350(94.1) 1.06(0.612)ǂ
Adequate 23(5.5) 12(5.2) 11(6.3) 0(0.0) 22(5.9)
Dietary Folate, 520μg/d
Inadequate 345(82.9) 194(83.6) 143(82.2) 0.14(0.790)ǂ 16(94.1) 307(82.5) 1.55(0.326)ǂ
Adequate 71(17.1) 38(16.4) 31(17.8) 1(5.9) 65(17.5)
Dietary Vitamin B12, 2.2μg/d
Inadequate 226(54.3) 123(53.0) 97(55.7) 0.29(0.615)ǂ 13(76.5) 196(52.7) 3.69(00.080)ǂ
Adequate 190(45.7) 109(47.0) 77(44.3) 4(23.5) 176(47.3)
Dietary Iron-Folate
Inadequate 343(82.5) 193(83.2) 142(81.6) 0.17(0.694)ǂ 16(94.1) 305(82.0) 1.65(0.327)ǂ
Adequate 73(17.5) 39(16.8) 32(18.4) 1(5.9) 67(18.0)
Dietary Iron-Vitamin B12
Inadequate 226(54.3) 123(53.0) 97(55.7) 0.29(0.615)ǂ 13(76.5) 196(52.7) 3.69(0.080)ǂ
Adequate 190(45.7) 109(47.0) 77(44.3) 4(23.5) 176(47.3)
MMI
Inadequate 206(49.5) 110(47.4) 92(52.9) 1.18(0.316)ǂ 13(76.5) 179(48.1) 5.22(0.026)ǂ
Adequate 210(50.5) 122(52.6) 82(47.1) 4(23.5) 193(51.9)

⸸Data are presented as frequency (percentage), ꬸ- Median(Interquartile), ꬸ- Mann Whitney test performed, ¥- Chi-square P value, ǂ- Fisher’s exact P value, Hb- Haemoglobin, HHS- Household Hunger Scale, WDDS- Women’s Dietary Diversity Score, MS- Micronutrient Supplement, NE- Nutrition Education, MMI- Multiple Micronutrient Intakes, bold values are significant at p<0.05. EAR Sources: Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline [57]; Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc [58]. The EAR for iron for 19 years old: 23mg/day.

The proportion of participants who had depleted body iron stores and those with normal body iron stores did not significantly vary by nutrients intake (p>0.05), except for multiple micronutrient intake (iron-folate-vitamin B12), whereby inadequate multiple micronutrient intake was higher among pregnant teenagers with depleted of body iron stores (82.4%) than those with normal body iron stores (57.4%, p = 0.026).

Table 2 indicates the relationship between MUAC status, serum nutrients status, and iron deficiency anaemia. The mean MUAC was higher among pregnant teenagers who were not anaemic (26.6±0.2cm) than those who were anaemic (25.8±0.2cm, p = 0.006). The proportion of participants who were anaemic and non-anaemic did not significantly differ by MUAC status (p = 0.319), although severe wasting was higher among anaemic participants (6.5%) than non-anaemic (4.6%) participants.

Table 2. Relationship between MUAC status, biochemical parameters and iron deficiency anaemia status.

Variable Total Hb status x2,P value Body iron stores x2, P value
Anaemia No anaemia Depleted Not depleted
Anthropometric
MUAC status
Mean MUAC 26.2±0.1 25.8±0.2 26.6±0.2 0.006 26.1±0.9 26.2±0.2 0.944
Severe wasting 23(5.5) 15(6.5) 8(4.6) 2.28 (0.319)¥ 1(5.9) 22(5.9) 1.58 (0.454)¥
Moderate/mild wasting 97(23.3) 58(25.0) 35(20.1) 6(35.3) 83(22.3)
Normal 296(71.2) 159(68.5) 131(75.3) 10(58.8) 267(71.8)
Biochemical variable
Serum vitamin A
Median(IQR) Serum vit A 0.5(0.2) 0.4(0.2) 0.5(0.2) 0.176 0.4(0.7) 0.5(0.2) 0.837
Low 336(86.4) 194(87.8) 142(84.5) 0.86 (0.373)ǂ 12(70.6) 324(87.1) 3.76 (0.066)ǂ
Normal 53(13.6) 27(12.2) 26(15.5) 5(29.4) 48(12.9)
Serum ferritin status
Mean serum ferritin 36.0±0.8 36.7±1.2 35.1±1.2 0.305 17.4±0.7 36.9±0.8 <0.001
Low 14(3.6) 9(4.1) 5(3.0) 0.33 (0.785) ǂ 1(5.9) 13(3.5) 0.26 (0.471)ǂ
Normal 375(96.4) 212(95.9) 163(97.0) 16(94.1) 359(96.5)
Serum PAB
Mean serum PAB 12.4±0.7 12.3±0.9 12.6±1.0 0.777 8.0±0.5 12.7±0.7 <0.001
Low 382(97.2) 216(96.9) 165(97.6) 0.21 (0.763) ǂ 17(100.0) 361(97.0) 0.51 (1.000)ǂ
Normal 11(2.8) 7(3.1) 4(2.4) 0(0.0) 11(3.0)
ZPP/Hb ratio
Median(IQR) ZPP/Hb ratio 67.2(32.2) 79.2(29.4) 53.8(21.1) <0.001 96.4(21.0) 66.5(32.0) <0.001
Normal 150(38.6) 37(16.7) 113(67.3) 118.33(<0.001)¥ 1(5.9) 149(40.1) 32.59 (<0.001) ¥
Moderately high 117(30.1) 75(33.9) 42(25.0) 0(0.0) 117(31.5)
High 122(31.4) 109(49.3) 13(7.7) 16(94.1) 106(28.5)
CRP status
Normal 371(95.4) 211(95.5) 160(95.2) 0.01(1.000)ǂ 16(94.1) 355(95.4) 0.063(0.561)ǂ
High 18(4.6) 10(4.5) 8(4.8) 1(5.9) 17(4.6)
Median(IQR) serum CRP 3.2(1.3) 3.1(1.4) 3.2(1.2) 0.242 3.2(1.8) 3.2(1.3) 0.991
Median(IQR) ZPP 26.2(9.6) 28.6(9.4) 23.3(8.4) <0.001 32.7(8.7) 25.9(9.4) 0.046
Median(IQR) serum TAC 1.1(0.6) 1.1(0.6) 1.1(0.6) 0.821 1.0(0.8) 1.1(0.6) 0.822

Data are presented as frequency (percentage), ꬸ- Mean±SEM (standard error mean), Independent t-test, Median (IQR- Interquartile) - Mann Whitney test, ¥- Chi-square P value, ǂ- Fisher’s exact P value, Hb- Haemoglobin, MUAC- Mid-Upper Arm Circumference, PAB- Prealbumin, ZPP- Zinc protoporphyrin, CRP- C-reactive protein, TAC- Total antioxidant capacity, bold values are significant at p < 0.05. ZPP/Hb measured in μmol/mol heme.

The proportion of participants with a high ZPP/Hb ratio, indicating poor systemic iron supply, was higher in anaemic (49.3%), compared with non-anaemic (7.7%) participants (p<0.001). The median levels of serum ZPP (p<0.001), and ZPP/Hb ratio (p<0.001) were significantly higher among pregnant teenagers who were anaemic (28.6μmol/L, 79.2μmol/mol heme) than those who were not anaemic (23.3μmol/L, 53.8 μmol/mol heme) respectively. For serum iron status, more anaemic participants (6.8%) had depleted iron stores than those who were not anaemic (1.2%, p = 0.010).

Almost all participants with deficient systemic iron supply (high ZPP/Hb ratio) (94.1%) had depleted body iron stores compared with less than a third (28.5%) among those with normal body iron stores (p<0.001). The mean levels of serum ferritin (36.9±0.8μg/L versus 17.4±0.7μg/L p<0.001), and prealbumin (12.7±0.7mg/L vs 8.0±0.5mg/L, p = 0.007) were higher among pregnant teenagers with normal body iron stores than those who had depleted body iron stores, respectively. Moreover, participants with normal body iron stores had a lower median level of serum ZPP (32.7μmol/L vs 25.9μmol/L, p = 0.046), and ZPP/Hb ratio (96.4μmol/mol heme vs 66.5μmol/mol heme, p<0.001), compared to those who had depleted body iron stores respectively.

Table 3 indicates how dietary factors and hunger status are associated with nutritional status and anaemia. Among those with inadequate MMI and depleted body iron stores, 84.6% were anaemic compared with 54.5% anaemia in adequate MMI and normal body iron stores. Among adequate MMI but depleted body iron stores, anaemia was 100% compared with 56.2% anaemia among inadequate MMI and normal body iron store participants. Anaemia in no hunger iron-depleted participants was 100%, moderate hunger iron-depleted stores participants 50%, and severe hunger iron-depleted stores participants 100%, compared to lower levels in no hunger normal iron stores (53.6%), moderate hunger normal body iron stores (60%), and severe hunger normal body iron stores participants (61%), p = 0.010. Likewise, anaemia was higher in inadequate WDDS and also depleted body iron stores participants (85.7%), than inadequate WDDS but normal body iron stores participants (56.4%), and also higher in adequate WDDS but depleted body iron stores participants (100%), compared with normal body iron stores (53.8%), p = 0.010.

Table 3. Interplay between MMI, HHS, WDDS, ZPP/Hb ratio, serum ferritin, body iron stores, and Hb status.

Haemoglobin (Hb) status
MMI Variable Anaemia No anaemia Chi-square P value
Inadequate Body Iron stores
Depleted 11(84.6%) 2(13.4%) 7.154 0.010
Normal 102(54.5%) 85(45.5%)
Adequate Body Iron stores
Depleted 4(100) 0(0.0)
Normal 104(56.2) 81(53.8%)
HHS Body Iron stores
No hunger Depleted 8(100) 0(0.0) 7.154 0.010
Normal 148(53.6) 128(46.4)
Moderate Body Iron stores
Depleted 2(50) 2(50)
Normal 33(60) 22(40)
Severe Body Iron stores
Depleted 5(100) 0(0.0)
Normal 25(61) 16(39)
WDDS Body Iron stores
Inadequate Depleted 12(85.7) 2(14.3) 7.154 0.010
Normal 121(56.4) 93(43.6)
Adequate Body Iron stores
Depleted 3(100) 0(0.0)
Normal 85(53.8) 73(46.2)
ZPP/Hb ratio Body Iron stores 7.154 0.010
Normal Depleted 0(0.0) 1(100)
Normal 37(24.8) 112(75.2)
Moderate high Body Iron stores
Depleted 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
Normal 75(64.1) 42(35.9)
High Body Iron stores
Depleted 15(93.8) 1(6.2)
Normal 94(88.7) 12(11.3)
Serum ferritin Body Iron stores
Low Depleted 1(100) 0(0.0) 7.154 0.010
Normal 8(61.5) 5(38.5)
Normal Body Iron stores
Depleted 14(87.5) 2(11.5)
Normal 198(55.2) 161(44.8)

Data are presented as frequency (percentage), Fisher’s exact P value, Hb- Haemoglobin, MMI- Multiple Micronutrient Intake, HHS- Household Hunger Scale, WDDS- Women’s Dietary Diversity Score, bold values are significant at p < 0.05.

Moreover, anaemia was consistently highest among high ZPP/Hb ratio participants (high ZPP/Hb signifying poor systemic iron supply), with either depleted (93.8%) or normal iron stores (88.7%), compared with the moderate ZPP/Hb ratio group, and the normal ZPP/Hb ratio group.

Last but not the least, anaemia was highest among low serum ferritin-depleted body iron stores participants (100%), followed by normal serum ferritin-depleted body iron stores (87.5%), then low serum ferritin-normal body iron stores (61.5%), and the least were among normal ferritin with normal body iron stores (55.2%, p = 0.010).

The results of between-subject effects, conducted in the univariate Generalized Linear Model are presented in Table 4. Taking into account all the multiple underlying factors of anaemia in the tests of associations on Hb levels, it was malaria tablet given at antenatal clinic (p = 0.035), MUAC (p = 0.043), ZPP (p<0.001), ZPP/Hb ratio (p<0.001) and body iron stores (p<0.001) that had a significant effect on the Hb levels. Some variables (e.gs. lived poverty index, serum levels of vitamin A, C-reactive protein, prealbumin) which were not significant were removed, to report a few items in the table.

Table 4. Tests of between-subject effects of multiple variables on haemoglobin levels.

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Hb levels
Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Significance
Intercept 47.54 1 47.54 44.645 <0.001
Community type 0.886 1 0.886 0.832 0.362
Age 0.559 1 0.559 0.525 0.469
WDDS 0.008 1 0.008 0.007 0.933
HHS 0.032 1 0.032 0.03 0.862
Malaria tablet given 4.788 1 4.788 4.497 0.035
Dietary iron 0.758 1 0.758 0.712 0.399
MMI 0.05 1 0.05 0.047 0.829
MUAC 4.392 1 4.392 4.125 0.043
Serum ferritin 0.422 1 0.422 0.396 0.529
ZPP 158.095 1 158.095 148.469 <0.001
ZPP/Hb ratio 188.605 1 188.605 177.122 <0.001
Body iron store 18.086 1 18.086 16.985 <0.001
Error 387.599 364 1.065

General Linear Model test for univariate parameters, BMI- Body mass index, Hb- Haemoglobin, TMS- Took Micronutrient Supplement, CMI- Combined Macronutrient Intake (energy, carbohydrate, and protein), MMI- Multiple Micronutrient Intake (Iron, folate and vitamin B12), ZPP- Zinc protoporphyrin, Bold values are significant at p<0.05.

The predictors of anaemia and depleted body iron stores of pregnant teenagers are presented in Table 5. Pregnant teenagers who had a high ZPP/Hb ratio (signifying poor systemic iron supply) had more than 9 times increased odds of being anaemic (OR = 9.7, p<0.001, 95%CI = 6.0–15.8), compared to those who had normal ZPP/Hb ratio. Pregnant teenagers who were wasted (OR = 1.2, p = 0.543, 95%CI = 0.6–2.3), and those who had depleted iron stores (OR = 3.0, p = 0.167, 95%CI = 0.6–14.6), had increased odds of being anaemic, compared to those with normal MUAC or normal iron stores respectively.

Table 5. Predictors of anaemia and depleted body iron stores.

Anaemia 95% Confidence Interval
Variable β OR Significance Lower Upper
MUAC
Wasted 0.201 1.2 0.543 0.6 2.3
Normal 1.0
ZPP/Hb ratio
High 2.277 9.7 <0.001 6.0 15.8
Normal 1.0
Body iron stores
Depleted 1.109 3.0 0.167 0.6 14.6
Normal 1.0
Depleted body iron stores 95% Confidence Interval
Variable β OR Significance Lower Upper
Serum ferritin
Low 1.181 3.3 0.291 0.4 29.2
Normal 1.0
Serum Prealbumin
Low -17.346 0.01 0.999
Normal 1.0
MMI
Inadequate 0.967 2.6 0.102 0.8 8.4
Adequate 1.0
HHS
Hunger present 1.049 2.9 0.040 1.1 7.8
No hunger 1.0
WDDS
Inadequate -1.136 0.3 0.087 0.1 1.2
Adequate 1.0
ZPP -0.004 1.0 0.493 0.9 1.0

β –Slope/regression co-efficient, OR- Odds ratio, Hb- Haemoglobin, combined moderate and severe wasting, moderate and severe hunger, and moderate-high and high ZPP/Hb ratio for statistical strength bold values are significant at p < 0.05.

Also, pregnant teenagers who experienced hunger had over 2 times increased odds of having depleted body iron stores (OR = 2.9, p = 0.040, 95%CI = 1.1–7.8), compared to those who did not experience hunger. Participants who had inadequate multiple micronutrients intakes (OR = 2.6, p = 0.102, 95%CI = 0.8–8.4), and those with low serum levels of ferritin (OR = 3.3, p = 0.291, 95%CI = 0.4–29.2), had an increased odds of depleted body iron stores. Pregnant teenagers who had inadequate women’s dietary diversity score (OR = 0.3, p = 0.087, 95%CI = 0.1–1.2) had a lower odds of depleted body iron stores.

Discussion

The key findings of the study were the high prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia among teenagers. Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) was common among pregnant teenagers, from both systemic serum iron, and their diet, and this is worrying. Our finding on IDA among teenagers is higher than that of pregnant adults in other studies in Ghana [20,59,60]. The studies by the Ghana Micronutrients Survey [20], the Ghana Demographic Health Survey [59], and Ayensu et al. [60] have reported that anaemia prevalence among pregnant adults were 56.0%, 44.6%, and 42.0% respectively. In Ghana, Ampiah et al. [21] and Nonterah et al. [32] reported that 70% and 52.0% pregnant teenagers were anaemic respectively, while in Palestine, a study by Srour et al. [61] reported 25.0% pregnant teenagers were anaemic and 52.0% had depleted body iron stores. This means that compared to adults, teenagers are more likely to be anaemic during pregnancy from our findings, and this may be due to their high nutritional needs and immature body tissue growth. Anaemia in pregnant teenagers has been attributed to the fact that they are still growing and need additional iron and folic acid to meet their own nutritional needs, and those of the developing foetus during gravidity [16]. However, we also report very low intakes of nutrients such as iron, folate and vitamin B12, and all these can lead to anaemia. Hence the high prevalence of anaemia in this group could be due to low dietary intake of nutrients/poor diet diversity that prevent anaemia. Iron deficiency anaemia is a public health problem among pregnant teenagers in Ghana [32]. Anaemia in pregnancy can lead to a greater risk of poor pregnancy outcomes, such as low birth weight, small-for-gestation age, stillbirth, preterm birth [16]. Our findings therefore suggest that the teenagers are at a greater risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Food deprivation can increase the risk of low systemic iron stores, and consequently anaemia [25]. For the adolescent, pregnancy can be a complicated issue due to the rapidly increased demands of nutrients, especially for iron and folic acid, for the mother’s blood expansion, growth as well as the foetus. Food deprivation and poor access to food are linked with poor dietary intakes, and the risk of micronutrient deficiencies, which can consequently lead to depleted body stores of nutrients [24,27,62]. We found hunger to predict depleted iron stores, with teenagers who suffered hunger, compared to those who did not suffer from hunger at increased risk of depleted body iron stores (OR = 2.9, p = 0.040, 95%CI = 1.1–7.8). Our previous study showed that sever hunger of the pregnant teenagers were associated with inadequate dietary diversity; and poor diet diversity could have contributed to their depleted iron stores [63]. We also found participants who were anaemic were more likely to suffer from both severe hunger and depleted body iron stores, suggesting a combined effect. This implies that severe maternal hunger could have caused depleted body iron stores, increasing the risk for anaemia. Although we observed that malaria tablets received at ANC effectively determined haemoglobin levels of the participant, those who were given tended to be more anaemic, implying that malaria was not the likely cause of iron deficiency anaemia among the teenagers.

The body requires iron, vitamin B12, and folate as substrates and co-factors for the effective production of haemoglobin. Meanwhile, poor dietary quality or low dietary diversity are the main culprit for low vitamin and mineral levels including vitamin B12, folate, and iron, increasing risk for anaemia [25,64]. We observed that teenagers who had inadequate WDDS compared to those with adequate WDDS were more likely to have a depleted body iron store (p = 0.046). Inadequate WDDS among the teenagers significantly contributed to poorer iron stores and anaemia occurrence, although the regression model showed a lower risk for depleted body iron stores (OR = 0.3, p = 0.089, 95%CI = 0.1–1.2). We also found that pregnant teenagers with depleted body iron stores were more likely to have inadequate multiple micronutrient intake than those with normal body iron stores (p = 0.046), and that, inadequate multiple micronutrient intakes (iron-folate-vitamin B12) contributed to depleted body iron stores and anaemia occurrence in the teenagers. This implies that consumption of less diversified diet, which could manifest as inadequate multiple micronutrient intake might have led to depleted iron stores, leading anaemia. In Indonesia, Diana et al. [65] reported the consumption of a less diversified diet, which lacked dietary iron, contributed to anaemia in pregnant women. Our findings call for strengthening nutrition education at the antenatal care clinics to promote the consumption of nutritious and diversified diets, but also improving the iron-folate supplementation offered to pregnant women.

Most often, women in low-and-middle-income countries go into pregnancy malnourished, and the demands of gravidity can worsen micronutrient deficiencies, leading to iron deficiency anaemia [32]. In this study maternal MUAC was associated with iron deficiency anaemia. The participants who were wasted (using MUAC) (OR = 1.2, p = 0.543, 95%CI = 0.6–2.3) were more likely to be anaemic, and this was consistent with a study among pregnant adults in Ghana [26]. This implies that wasting can be associated with anaemia during pregnancy.

We observed that being depleted of body iron stores compared to normal body iron stores was associated with an increased risk of anaemia. Deficient systemic supply of iron, and depleted body iron stores, were both predictors of iron deficiency anaemia in the teenagers, with an odds ratio greater than 2. Participants with a deficient supply of iron were more likely to have poorer iron stores and become anaemic. Similarly, participants with low serum ferritin levels were more likely to have poorer iron stores and become anaemic. These imply that low serum ferritin and deficient systemic supply of iron could also be associated with depleted iron stores in the teenagers, thus lead to the occurrence of maternal anaemia. Poor dietary intake might contribute to the depletion of iron stores, which affects the systemic supply of iron for haemoglobin production [25,64]. In the body, ZPP and serum ferritin are among iron biomarkers that depend on dietary intake to affect the iron status, and the combination of the two can predict whether iron stores are depleted or not [56]. In cases where iron is deficient from body stores (that is; low serum ferritin), the final step of haemoglobin production which involves a combination of ferrous protoporphyrin and globin is affected, leading to iron being replaced by zinc to produce zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) in a normal ratio 30,000:1. This progressive iron deficiency increases ZPP levels, which has a profound effect on the supply of iron for haemoglobin production [47,66]. In this study, we observed a high ZPP/Hb ratio among the teenagers who were anaemic, indicating deficient iron supply for haemoglobin production. All these associations tend to explain that poor micronutrient intake and severe hunger, and low serum ferritin could contribute to deficient systemic iron supply and concurrent depleted body iron stores, leading to iron deficiency anaemia among pregnant teenagers.

Our findings have implications. In our previous study, which involved a secondary data analysis of anaemia trend in the district, we reported a higher prevalence of anaemia among pregnant teenagers than adults, and mean Hb levels of both teenagers and adults were found to be higher by the 36th week of pregnancy than at antenatal registration. We observed a positive correlation between Hb at antenatal registration and 36th-week gestation, indicating that pre-pregnancy Hb levels, largely determined anaemia occurrence during the latter stages of pregnancy [21]. In this follow up study, we sought to understand the associated factors of anaemia among teenagers the teenagers. This group is understudied, and this makes our study and its findings crucial. The current findings have provided enough evidence that the high maternal anaemia prevalence among teenagers was a result of hunger experienced during pregnancy, inadequate multiple micronutrient intakes related to poor dietary quality or low dietary diversity, and low serum ferritin levels, which contributed to deficient systemic supply of iron and depleted body iron stores. Other factors, such as wasting and inadequate dietary diversity contributed to depleted iron stores, and anaemia occurrence. Malaria tablet given at ANC was not significantly associated with Hb levels. Our findings call for the need for nutrition education, livelihood empowerment among these teenager, nutritional support to meet their needs, and strengthening antenatal service delivery to pregnant adolescents. Also, interventions that encourage food fortification and diversification has been reported to reduce anaemia in women of child-bearing age, and these interventions can be considered [67].

Study limitations

The study has limitations. The use of 24 h dietary recalls may lead to over-or under-estimations [68]. In the present study, we used a 3-day repeated recall to cover up for this. Also, a couple of food items consumed were not among the listed foods in the nutrient analysis template used to estimate nutrient levels. Instead, the template had similar foods that were used. This could have affected the estimated nutrient levels. Interpretation of the findings may not be generalized to the rest of Ghana, but probably indicate a similar situation of adolescents in other Regions of Ghana. We are aware of some bias in using a first come first served procedure in sampling. However, we employed convenience sampling by using a first come first served basis due to the low turnout of the pregnant teenagers at the clinics. As such, this sampling method was therefore appropriate to help obtain the study sample size and a representative population. Except for participants who were ineligible for this study, all participants who came and were eligible were recruited. Thus, there is less likely to have a probability bias risk involved in the sampling process.

Conclusions

Iron deficiency anaemia is common among the pregnant teenagers studied, and the related significantly to hunger, low MUAC, a deficient systemic supply of iron, depleted body iron stores, and to a smaller extent malaria tablets given at ANC. Antenatal service delivery should focus on the nutritional needs of pregnant women, while special attention is given to teenagers to prevent the devastating consequences of anaemia during pregnancy.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Relationship between sociodemographic and haemoglobin status.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support received from the directors of health, health workers in the health centers where the study took place, and the pregnant teenagers.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because it contains sensitive identifying information. However, data are available from the Committee on Human Research, Publication, and Ethics (CHRPE), the ethics board of the School of Medical Sciences of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, KNUST and Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kumasi, Ghana (Email: chrpe.knust.kath@gmail.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

Funding for this study was provided by the Nestle Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Dahl RE, Allen NB, Wilbrecht L, Suleiman AB. Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature. 2018; 554: 441–50. 10.1038/nature25770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nguyen PH, Scott S, Neupane S, Tran LM, Menon P. Social, biological, and programmatic factors linking adolescent pregnancy and early childhood undernutrition: a path analysis of India’s 2016 National Family and Health Survey. Lancet Child Adolescent Health. 2019; 3: 463–473. 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30110-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yussif A, Lassey A, Ganyaglo GY, Kantelhardt EJ, Kielstein H. The long-term effects of adolescent pregnancies in a community in Northern Ghana on subsequent pregnancies and births of the young mothers. Reprod Health. 2017; 14: 178. 10.1186/s12978-017-0443-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Adolescent pregnancy. 2019. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329883/WHO-RHR-19.15-eng.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), ICF Macro. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. GSS, GHS, & ICF Macro, Accra (2014).
  • 6.Neal S, Matthews Z, Frost M, Fogstad H, Camacho AV, Laski L. Childbearing in adolescents aged 12–15 years in low resource countries: a neglected issue. New estimates from demographic and household surveys in 42 countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 1114–18. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01467.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Azevedo WF, Diniz MB, Fonseca ES, Azevedo LM, Evangelista CB. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: Systematic review of the literature. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2015; 13(4): 618–626. 10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO. Global Health Estimates 2015: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2015. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wirth JP, Woodruff BA, Engle-Stone R, Namaste SML, Temple VJ, Petry N, Macdonald B, et al. Predictors of anemia in women of reproductive age: Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) project. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106 (Suppl):416S–27S. 10.3945/ajcn.116.143073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lumor O, Dzabeng F, Adanu RM. Factors influencing the use of anemia preventing measures among antenatal clinic attendees in the Kintampo North Municipality, Ghana. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019; 23(2): 35–43. 10.29063/ajrh2019/v23i2.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheehan P, Sweeny K, Rasmussen B, Wils A, Friedman HS, Mahon J, et al. Building the foundations for sustainable development: a case for global investment in the capabilities of adolescents. Lancet. 2017; 390: 1792–806. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30872-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Means RT. Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia: implications and impact in pregnancy, fetal development, and early childhood parameters. Nutrients. 2020; 12: 447. 10.3390/nu12020447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mettananda S, Suranjan M, Fernando R, Dias T, Mettananda C, Rodrigo R, et al. Anaemia among females in child-bearing age: Relative contributions, effects and interactions of alpha- and beta thalassemia. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13: e0206928. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen C, Grewal J, Betran AP, Vogel JP, Souza JP, Zhang J. Severe anemia, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia as risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in developing countries. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018; 13: 141–147. 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. Nutritional anaemias: tools for effective prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017; Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1091289/retrieve.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.WHO. Intermittent iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy. 2019. Available at https://www.who.int/elena/titles/intermittent_iron_pregnancy/en/. Accessed 5 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Von Look P, Lincetto O, Fogstad H. Iron and folate supplementation: Integrated management of pregnancy and childbirth (IMPAC). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. 10.1007/s11427-006-0265-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zerfu TA, Ayele HT. Micronutrients and pregnancy; effect of supplementation on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review. Nutr J. 2013;12(1):20. 10.1186/1475-2891-12-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ministry of Health. Guidelines for malaria in pregnancy. Accra: Ministry of Health, Ghana; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.University of Ghana, GroundWork, University of Wisconsin-Madison, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust, UNICEF. Ghana Micronutrients Survey 2017. Accra, Ghana; 2017.
  • 21.Ampiah MKM, Kovey JJ, Apprey C, Annan RA. Comparative analysis of trends and determinants of anaemia between adult and teenage pregnant women in two rural districts of Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1379. 10.1186/s12889-019-7603-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huch R Sr. Iron defi ciency and iron deficiency anaemia. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lopez A, Cacoub P, Macdougall IC, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Iron deficiency anaemia. Lancet. 2016; 387: 907–916. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60865-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kirkpatrick SI, Tarasuk V. Food insecurity is associated with nutrient inadequacies among Canadian adults and adolescents. J. Nutr. 2008; 138:604–612. 10.1093/jn/138.3.604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abbaspour N, Hurrell NA, Kelishadi R. Review on iron and its importance for human health. J Res Med Sci. February;19(2):164–74. ; PMCID: PMC3999603. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Agbozo F, Abubakari A, Der J, Jahn A. Maternal dietary intakes, red blood cell indices and risk for anemia in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy and at predelivery. Nutrients. 2020; 12: 777. 10.3390/nu12030777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pobee RA, Aguree S, Colecraft EK, Gernand AD, Murray-Kolb LE. Food Insecurity and Micronutrient status among Ghanaian women planning to become pregnant. Nutrients. 2020; 12: 470. 10.3390/nu12020470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baidoo SE, Tay SCK, Obiri-Danso K, Abruquah HH. Intestinal helminth infection and anaemia during pregnancy: A community-based study in Ghana. J Bacteriol Res. 2010;2(2):9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Apea-Kubi KA, Yamaguchi S, Sakyi B, Kishimoto T, Ofori-Adjei D, Hagiwara T. Neisseria gonorrhoea, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Treponema pallidum infection in antenatal and gynecological patients at Korle-Bu teaching hospital, Ghana. J Infect Dis. 2004; December;57(6):253–6. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Völker F, Cooper P, Bader O, et al. Prevalence of pregnancy-relevant infections in a rural setting of Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):172. 10.1186/s12884-017-1351-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Engmann C, Adanu R, Lu T-S, Bose C, Lozoff B. Anemia and iron deficiency in pregnant Ghanaian women from urban areas. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;101(1):62–66. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nonterah EA, Adomolga E, Yidana A, Kagura J, Agorinya I, Alhassan M, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of anaemia among pregnant women initiating antenatal care in rural Northern Ghana. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. 2019; 11(1): a1892. 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wemakor A. Prevalence and determinants of anaemia in pregnant women receiving antenatal care at a tertiary referral hospital in Northern Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019; 19: 45. 10.1186/s12884-019-2201-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anlaaku P, Anto F. Anaemia in pregnancy and associated factors: a cross sectional study of antenatal attendants at the Sunyani Municipal Hospital, Ghana. BMC Res Notes. 2017; 10: 402. 10.1186/s13104-017-2742-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ghana Statistical Service. Population by region. 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2020, from http://www.statsghana.gov.gh/regionalpopulation.php?population=MTI5MzE3OTU5OC40NDg1&&Ashanti&regid=1. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF. Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2017: Key Indicators Report. 2018. Accra, Ghana: GSS, GHS, and ICF. Available online at http://www2.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/PR95.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020.
  • 37.Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121–6. 10.4103/0253-7176.116232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ayensu J, Edusei A, Oduro I, Larbie C. Status of some antioxidant micronutrient and pregnancy outcomes in Ghanaian status of some antioxidant micronutrient and pregnancy outcomes in Ghanaian Adolescents Attending Antenatal Clinic in Urban (Suntreso) and Rural (Mampong) Hospitals. EJNFS. 2017; 7(2): 120–127. 10.9734/EJNFS/2017/24209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Food Science and Nutrition Department, University of Ghana. The nutrient analysis template software excel spreadsheet for Ghanaian foods, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science. Dietary references intakes. The essential guide to nutrient requirements. 2006. National Academies Press, Washington D.C, USA. Pp. 530–531. 10.17226/11537 ISBN 978-0-309-10091-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.FAO and FHI. Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women A Guide to Measurement. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kennedy G, Ballard T, Dop M. Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. FAO. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ballard T, Coates J, Swindale A, Deitchler M. Household Hunger Scale: Indicator definition and measurement guide. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition technical assistance II project, FHI. 2011. August; 360:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Robert Mattes. Afrobarometer; The material and political bases of lived poverty in Africa:20 insights from the Afrobarometer. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lopez LB, Calvo E, Poy M, del Valle Balmaceda Y, Camera K. Changes in skinfolds and mid-upper arm circumference during pregnancy in Argentine women. Matern Child Nutr. 2011; 7(3):253–262. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00237.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fakier A, Petro G, Fawcus S. Mid-upper arm circumference: A surrogate for body mass index in pregnant women. S Afr Med J. 2017;107(7):606–610. 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i7.12255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes. Bull World Health Organ. 1995, 73(suppl 1). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assessing the iron status of populations. 2nd ed. 2007. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75368/1/9789241596107_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 18 June 2020.
  • 49.Dignass A, Farrag K, Stein J. Limitations of serum ferritin in diagnosing iron deficiency in inflammatory conditions. International Journal of Chronic Diseases. 2018; 10.1155/2018/9394060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Benzie I.F and Strain JJ. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of "Antioxidant Power": The FRAP Assay. Annal Biochem. 1996; 239(1): 70–6. 10.1006/abio.1996.0292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.WHO. Serum Ferritin Concentrations for The Assessment of Iron Status and Iron Deficiency in Populations. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ozturk G, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Ucar F, Ginis Z, Erden G, Danisman N. Concentration of prealbumin and some appetite controlling hormones in pregnancies associated with hyperemesis gravidarum. Annals of Biochemistry. 2017; 54(2): 258–263. 10.1177/0004563216654724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.WHO CRP reference. World Health Organization. C-reactive protein concentrations as a marker of inflammation or infection for interpreting biomarkers of micronutrient status. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available online:http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/133708/1/WHO_NMH_NHD_EPG_14.7_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 11 November 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stanton NV, Gunter EW, Parsons PJ, Field PH. Empirically determined lead- poisoning screening cutoff for the Protofluor-Z hematofluorometer. Clin Chem. 1989; 35: 2104–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yu KH. Effectiveness of zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio for screening iron deficiency in preschool-aged children. Nutrition Research and Practice. 2011; 5(1): 40–45. 10.4162/nrp.2011.5.1.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Labbe RF, Vreman HJ, Stevenson DK. Zinc protoporphyrin: A metabolite with a mission. Clinical Chemistry. 1999; 45:2060–2072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.IOM (Institute of Medicine). Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. 1998, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. 2001, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), ICF International. Demographic and health survey 2014. Rockville, MD: GSS, GHS, and ICF International; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ayensu J, Annan R, Lutterodt H, Edusei A, Peng L. Prevalence of anaemia and low intake of dietary nutrients in pregnant women living in rural and urban areas in the Ashanti region of Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15(1): e0226026. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Srour MA, Aqel SS, Srour KM, Younis KR. and Samarah F. Prevalence of anemia and iron deficiency among Palestinian pregnant women and its association with pregnancy outcome. Anemia. 2018; 10.1155/2018/9135625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tarasuk VS. Household food insecurity with hunger is associated with women’s food intakes, health and household circumstances. J. Nutr. 2001; 131: 2670–2676. 10.1093/jn/131.10.2670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gyimah LA, Annan RA, Apprey C, Edusei A, Aduku LNE, Asamoah-Boakye O, et al. Dietary diversity and its correlates among pregnant adolescent girls in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16(3): e0247979. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chaparro CM, Suchdev PS. Anaemia epidemiology, pathophysiology, and etiology in low-and-middle-income countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019; 1450(1): 15–31. 10.1111/nyas.14092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Diana R, Khomsan A, Anwar F, Christianti DF, Kusuma R. and Rachmayanti RD. Dietary quantity and diversity among anaemic pregnant women in Madura Island, Indonesia. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2019; 1–7. 10.1155/2019/2647230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Peng YY. and Uprichard J. Ferritin and iron studies in anaemia and chronic disease. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 2017; 54(1): 43–48. 10.1177/0004563216675185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Awaluddin SM, Ahmad NA, Naidu BM, Mohamad MS, Yusof M, Razak MA, et al. A population-based anaemia screening using point-of care in estimating prevalence of anaemia in Malaysian adults: findings from a Nationwide survey. Journal of Community Medicine and Health Education. 2017; 7: 513. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Arsenault J, Moursi M, Olney DK, Becquey E, Ganaba R. Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso. Matern. Child Nutr. 2020; 16: e13014. 10.1111/mcn.13014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nitin Joseph

11 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-21782

Factors associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Ghana

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Annan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

No post-hoc corrections for multiple comparisons are referred to in this manuscript.

The potential limitations of the study are not discussed.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 11th October 2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dr Nitin Joseph

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please address the following:

- Please refer to any post-hoc corrections to correct for multiple comparisons during your statistical analyses. If these were not performed please justify the reasons. Please refer to our statistical reporting guidelines for assistance (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting).

- Please ensure you have thoroughly discussed any potential limitations of this study within the Discussion section, including the potential introduction of bias during data collection.

3. You indicated that you had ethical approval for your study and state: "written personal or parental consent was obtained from participants before the study". Please confirm that you obtained consent from parents or guardians of the minors included in the study specifically.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Title -Please add the type of study

Key words -Should be mesh term

Ethics section:If the teenage pregnant women is less than 18 then was consent of parents pr gaurdians taken??

In analysis Fishers exact test is used for 3x2 tables also but fishers exact test should be used for 2x2 table

Reviewer #2: Some methodological queries including validation of the data collection tools, the constitution of the team that performed the data collection, training provided to the team, standardization of data collection methods (including anthropological and biochemical investigations) have not been addressed.

Limitations of the study, potential sources of bias including those due to sampling and efforts made, if any, to address the same are not reported.

In the results section, there is repetition of information in the text and the tables, which can be avoided- only relevant findings and statistically significant associations may be included in the text.

The number of tables may be decreased (Comments attached within the pdf of the manuscript).

Discussion may be made more crisp and concise.

Reviewer #3: The answers to the comments have been included along with the questions.

If Non Parametric test has been used (Mann Whitney U test), then continuous variables may be expressed as Median and Inter quartile range.

For variables such as mean MUAC, mean Serum PAB, mean Serum Feeritin, it seems that Independent t test is appropriate rather than Mann Whitney U test as mentioned in Table 2 and Table3

Reviewer #4: IDA has been thoroughly researched and it has been found that most common cause is nutritional, it was not clear in the need as to why authors sought those particular factors for study. Study results were highlighted, however discussion with known literature could be better. Limitations of the study and generalizability and feasibility were not discussed well. Few sentences could be phrased better.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-21782_reviewer.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-21782_reviewer with comments.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review_of_PONE.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-21782_reviewer.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 27;16(4):e0250246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250246.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


9 Mar 2021

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

Thanks for reviewing our manuscript.

In line with the reviewer’s comments, the following revisions have been made to the Manuscript ID: PONE-D-20-21782 entitled “Factors associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Ghana: A hospital-based prospective cohort study’ by Reginald Adjetey Annan, Linda Afriyie Gyimah, Charles Apprey, Anthony Kwaku Edusei, Odeafo Asamoah-Boakye, Linda Nana Esi Aduku, Wisdom Azanu, and Herman E. Lutterodt. Below is our submission, highlight in blue colour, and yellow in the revised manuscript.

Journal Requirements/Editor comments:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: The manuscript has been revised to meet all of PLOS ONE’s style requirements.

2. Please address the following:

- Please refer to any post-hoc corrections to correct for multiple comparisons during your statistical analyses. If these were not performed please justify the reasons. Please refer to our statistical reporting guidelines for assistance (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting).

Response: The manuscript had no multiple comparison that used One-way ANOVA, and so post-hoc corrections were not needed to correct multiple comparisons.

- Please ensure you have thoroughly discussed any potential limitations of this study within the Discussion section, including the potential introduction of bias during data collection.

Response: The discussion has been revised to include limitations during data collection

3. You indicated that you had ethical approval for your study and state: "written personal or parental consent was obtained from participants before the study". Please confirm that you obtained consent from parents or guardians of the minors included in the study specifically.

Response: Yes, parents/guardians of the teenagers gave consent on behalf of participants less than 18 years old.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

Response: Yes, there are no legal or ethical restriction to our data, and will be made available upon request..

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

Response: Not applicable

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

Response: Data will be made available upon acceptance for publication.

Response to Reviewer One Comments

Point 1: Title -Please add the type of study

Response 1: The type of study has been added to the manuscript title. Please see lines 1-2

Point 2: Keywords -Should be mesh term

Response 2: Keywords has been revised to use mesh term. Please see line 46

Point 3: Ethics section: If the teenage pregnant women are less than 18 then was consent of parents/guardians taken??

Response 3: Yes, we obtained consent from parents/guardians of participants less than 18 years. Please we have included this statement in the Ethics section. Please see line 154-155.

Point 4: In analysis Fishers exact test is used for 3x2 tables also but fishers exact test should be used for 2x2 table.

Response 4: Yes, Fisher’s exact is required for 2 x 2 Cross-tabulation analysis, while Chi-square test is required for 3 x 2 onwards. However, in cases when the cell values are less than 5 in 3 x 2 Cross-tabulation analysis, the Chi-square test is violated and void and thus the Fisher’s exact P value is rather preferred, and reported.

Point 6: Mention the full form first time in text

Response 6: The full form of MUAC has been mentioned in the methods of Abstract, and abbreviation has been subsequently used. Please see line 23.

Point 7: Why was 32 weeks kept as the cut off?

Response 7: Initially, the cut-off for recruiting the pregnant teenagers was set at below 24 months but we were unable to get enough participants during the early stage of the data collection, and the study had a timeline for each stage of the research. Due to this situation encountered, the gestation age for recruitment was increased to 32 weeks to give more room for recruitment.

Point 8: Why was low birth weight selected for sample size calculation?

Response 8: This study is part of a larger prospective study that followed the teenagers to obtain birth outcomes. The sample size was calculated from the main study which had birth weight as the main outcome of the larger study. We used the prevalence rate of low birth weight from a previous study in Ghana in calculating the sample size. We have included this statement in the sample size determination to give a clearer picture. Please see lines 119-121.

Point 9: Not clear in eligibility criteria

Response 9: The statement on the eligibility criteria has been revised to make it clear. The inclusion criterion was that pregnant teenagers should be within the ages 13 – 19 years old, and also a resident in the selected communities. Please see lines 141-143.

Point 10: Figure attached is not clear, also axis is not appropriate.

Response 10: The figure has been revised to have a clearer view, and the percentage axis has been removed. Please see figure 1 at lines 742-745.

Point 11: How was Fisher’s test used in Supplement 1 for Income status and haemoglobin status?

Response 11. We used Fisher’s exact test because some cell values were less than 5 and in such case, the Chi-square test is violated.

Response to Reviewer Two Comments

Reviewer #2 Point 1: Some methodological queries including validation of the data collection tools, the constitution of the team that performed the data collection, training provided to the team, standardization of data collection methods (including anthropological and biochemical investigations) have not been addressed.

Response 1. Please the methodological queries raised in the data collection section have been addressed. Please see lines 162-166; 169-170; 207-209; 214-215, 217-219, 226-227 under Data collection section.

Point 2: Limitations of the study, potential sources of bias including those due to sampling and efforts made, if any, to address the same are not reported.

Response 3: Thanks for prompting our attention to this important issue. The limitation of the study has been reported in the manuscript. The study has limitations. The use of 24 h dietary recalls may lead to over-or under-estimations [Arsenault et al., 2020]. In the present study, we used a 3-day repeated recall to cover up for this. Also, a couple of food items consumed were not among the listed foods in the nutrient analysis template used to estimate nutrient levels. Instead, the template had similar foods that were used. This could have affected the estimated nutrient levels. Interpretation of the findings may not be generalized to the rest of Ghana, but probably indicate a similar situation of adolescents in other Regions of Ghana. We are aware of some bias in using a first come first served procedure in sampling. However, we employed convenience sampling by using a first come first served basis due to the low turnout of the pregnant teenagers at the clinics. As such, this sampling method was, therefore, appropriate to help obtain the study sample size and a representative population. Except for participants who were ineligible for this study, all participants who came and were eligible were recruited. Thus, there is less likely to have a probability bias risk involved in the sampling process. Please see lines 527-538.

Point 4: In the results section, there is repetition of information in the text and the tables, which can be avoided- only relevant findings and statistically significant associations may be included in the text. The number of tables may be decreased (Comments attached within the pdf of the manuscript).

Discussion may be made more crisp and concise.

Response 4: The description of the table results has been revised to describe only relevant and significant findings. Tables 1,2,3 and supplement 2 have been combined and restructured to reduce the number of tables. Please see new Tables 1-3. The discussion has been revised to make it concise.

Point 5: Risk of selection bias, how did authors address this bias

Response 5: We are aware of some bias in using a first come first served procedure in sampling. However, we employed convenience sampling by using a first come first served basis due to the low turnout of the pregnant teenagers at the clinics. As such, this sampling method was, therefore, appropriate to help obtain the study sample size and a representative population. Except for participants who were ineligible for this study, all participants who came and were eligible were recruited. Thus, there is less likely to have a probability bias risk involved in the sampling process. Please see lines 532-538.

Point 6: Who collected the data on anthropometric measurement? How many were involved? What training was received?

Response 6: Anthropometric measurements were taken by trained enumerators. A two-day training workshop was undertaken by research experts to train all enumerators on each data collection tool. A day field pre-testing session followed the training in a nearby community health center. These trained enumerators carried out all data collection for this study at the health centers/hospitals. Please see lines 161-166; 207-208.

Point 7: Who administered the questionnaire? How was the questionnaire validated? May not be the most appropriate method, could have gone for 1 week recall- dietary cycle method.

Response 7: Trained MPhil Human Nutrition and Dietetics students collected dietary intakes of the participants. Please see line 169-171. The 24-hour dietary recall is a validated tool, which has been extensively used in assessing dietary intakes of the population (Arsenault et al., 2020). We are also aware of the disadvantages in the use of the 24-h recall and thus we have stated the limitation in the use of the 24h recall under the discussion. Please see lines 527-532.

Point 8: Validation of the questionnaire used to obtain food craving, pica practices and food aversion?

Response 8: The data on the eating behaviour has been removed from the study.

The tables have been combined and restructured to report significant findings and this excluded the data on eating behaviour (food craving, pica practices, and food aversion).

Point 9: Was the data collection of anthropometric observed and verified by the investigators? How many people were involved in the measurement? How was it standardized to avoid inter-observer variations?

Response 9: The measurement of the mid-upper arm circumference was performed by two trained enumerators at a time. One investigator assisted and observed the measurement to reduce unforeseen errors. MUAC measurement was standardized by taking it twice for each participant, please see lines 214-215. We believe the training giving to the enumerators will reduce any inter-observer variations.

Point 10: BMI may not be the most accurate method for assessment of nutritional status in pregnancy. Weight gain during pregnancy is more accurate rather than BMI to assess nutritional status and fetal growth?

Response 10: BMI measurement has been removed from the study, as it was not significant in the study, and not a reliable nutritional status tool during pregnancy.

Point 11: May not be necessary to include all proportions; only those associations that are significant may be highlighted in the results. Avoid repetition of the results both in word and tables.

Response 11: The description of the results for the tables have been revised to report relevant and significant findings. Please see lines 288-352.

Point 12: Table 4 may be retained over the others. There are too many tables, the rest of the tables (1,2,3) may be combined to include only relevant findings.

Response 12: Tables 1,2,3 have been combined and revised to include only relevant findings. Please see new Tables 1-3.

Point 13: Although the discussion is well written, it is too lengthy as many theoretical explanations are given. Make the discussion crisper and concise.

Response 13: The discussion has been revised to make it concise. Please see lines 436-525.

Point 14: You can include the reasons as to what might explain the similarities and differences between the current study and the other studies used to compare the findings.

Response 14: The discussion on sociodemographics has been removed, because it does contribute much significant in the study. We also wanted to reduce the length of the discussion.

Point 15: Add a note on the limitations of the study, potential sources of bias, and the effort made, if any to address these biases.

Response 15: The limitations of the study have been included in the discussion. The study has limitations. The use of 24 h dietary recalls may lead to over-or under-estimations [Arsenault et al., 2020]. In the present study, we used a 3-day repeated recall to cover up for this. Also, a couple of food items consumed were not among the listed foods in the nutrient analysis template used to estimate nutrient levels. Instead, the template had similar foods that were used. This could have affected the estimated nutrient levels. Interpretation of the findings may not be generalized to the rest of Ghana, but probably indicate a similar situation of adolescents in other Regions of Ghana. We are aware of some bias in using a first come first served procedure in sampling. However, we employed convenience sampling by using a first come first served basis due to the low turnout of the pregnant teenagers at the clinics. As such, this sampling method was, therefore, appropriate to help obtain the study sample size and a representative population. Except for participants who were ineligible for this study, all participants who came and were eligible were recruited. Thus, there is less likely to have a probability bias risk involved in the sampling process. Please see lines 527-538.

Response to Reviewer Three Comments

Point 1: Describe the formula used to estimate the sample size of 420.

Response 1: The sample size was calculated using the formula from Charan and Biswas study [37]:

n= 2(Z α/2 + Z β )2 p(1-p)/(P1-P2)^2.

Where, n=sample size, Z α/2 =1.96 at type 1 error of 5%, Z β = 0.84 at 80% power, P1=LBW in pregnant adolescents with adequate nutritional status (11.6%), P2 = LBW in pregnant adolescents with poor nutritional status (23.3%), p1-p2= difference in prevalence of low birth weight between pregnant adolescents with adequate nutritional status at birth and those with inadequate nutritional status, and p= pooled prevalence= (p1 +p2)/2. A pilot study among pregnant adolescents in the area reported LBW prevalence of 23.3% [38]. Hence, we proposed that LBW in pregnant adolescents with adequate nutritional status would be 11.4%, while those with poor nutritional status would remain 23.3%, a reduction of just above half (51.1%). Hence, p1=11.4%, p2=23.3%, their proportions being p1=0.114 and p2=0.233, and p=(0.114 +0.233)/2= 0.1735.

Using the above descriptives, the sample size n= 2(1.96+0.84) 2 x 0.1735(1-0.233)/(0.114-0.233) 2, n=2.09/0.01, equal 209 was calculated, which implied we needed to recruit 209 participants in each arm of the study (half in the poorly nourished group and a half in the well-nourished group) making 418 participants showing a significant association between poor nutrition and LBW. However, we added 10% attrition to give 460 participants who were needed. However, the study had 416 participants. Please see lines 121-137.

Point 2. If Non-Parametric test has been used (Mann Whitney U test), then continuous variables may be expressed as Median and Interquartile range.

Response 2: The continuous variables expressed as means have been revised to the median and interquartile range. Please see Tables 1, 2, and 3.

Point 3. For variables such as mean MUAC, mean Serum PAB, mean Serum Ferritin, it seems that Independent t test is appropriate rather than Mann Whitney U test as mentioned in Table 2 and Table3.

Response 3. Tables 2 and 3 have been revised to use an independent t-test to analyze variables such as mean MUAC, mean Serum PAB, mean Serum Ferritin. Please see Tables 2 and 3.

Point 4. Mention the quality and adequacy of the model used.

Response 4: The binary regression model is an efficient way to determine the effect size of a predicting variable to the outcome variable. The adequacy of the data was described by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit for the model. A p value > 0.05 shows the data are sufficient for the model, and in this study, we obtained p values > 0.05 for both models; anaemia model (p = 0.278) and depleted body iron stores model (p = 0.867). The overall predictive percentage was above 50 percent for the two models used, which also shows the quality of the data used in the regression model. The overall predicted percentage for the anaemia model was 76.3%, while that of the depleted body iron store model was 95.6%.

Response to Reviewer Four Comments

Reviewer #4 Point 1: IDA has been thoroughly researched and it has been found that the most common cause is nutritional; it was not clear the need as to why authors sought those particular factors for study. Study results were highlighted, however, discussion with known literature could be better. Limitations of the study and generalizability and feasibility were not discussed well. Few sentences could be phrased better.

Response 1: This study was birthed out from our previous retrospective study. In the previous study, which involved a secondary data analysis of anaemia trend in the district, we reported a higher prevalence of anaemia among pregnant teenagers than adults, and mean Hb levels of both teenagers and adults were found to be higher by the 36th week of pregnancy than at antenatal registration. We observed a positive correlation between Hb at antenatal registration and 36th-week gestation, indicating that pre-pregnancy Hb levels, largely determined anaemia occurrence during the latter stages of pregnancy [21]. In this follow up study, we sought to understand the associated factors of anaemia among teenagers the teenagers. This group is understudied, and this makes our study and its findings crucial. Against this backdrop, we decided to look into all the possible factors from literature; such as dietary intakes, poverty status, hunger status, and biochemical markers that contribute to anaemia, and if these factors exist among adolescents in Ghana living in rural and urban areas. Please see lines 508-518. The discussion has been revised to incorporate only known literature. Please see lines 436-525. The limitation of the study has been addressed. Please see lines 527-538. Grammatical errors and sentence phrases have been corrected and passed through an English grammar editing tool known as Grammerly.com.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Leeberk Raja

30 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-21782R1

Factors associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Kumasi, Ghana: A hospital-based prospective cohort study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Annan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 14 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Leeberk Raja, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Thank you for revising the manuscript. Your work has a significant merit and potential to be accepted for publication. However, the figure presented lacks few pre-requisites for a bar chart. It has been pointed out by a reviewer and even after that the revised figure does not have Y axis and there are errors. It's suggested that you can think of presenting the data in the figure in a different format and submit a revised version of the manuscript. We will re-assess and let you know the final decision on your paper.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 27;16(4):e0250246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250246.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


1 Apr 2021

Joerg Heber, Ph.D.,

The Editor-in-Chief,

PLoS One Corporation,

California, USA.

POINT-BY-POINT REVISIONS IN RESPONSE TO REVIEWER/EDITOR COMMENTS

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

Thanks for reviewing our manuscript.

In line with the reviewer’s comments, the following revisions have been made to the Manuscript ID: PONE-D-20-21782R1 entitled “Factors associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Ghana: A hospital-based prospective cohort study’ by Reginald Adjetey Annan, Linda Afriyie Gyimah, Charles Apprey, Anthony Kwaku Edusei, Odeafo Asamoah-Boakye, Linda Nana Esi Aduku, Wisdom Azanu, and Herman E. Lutterodt. Below is our submission, highlight in blue colour, and yellow in the revised manuscript.

Journal Requirement:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice

Response: The reference list has been revised and it is complete. All references are correctly cited and none have been retracted. However, we have added another reference in our discussion and made changes to the numbering of the references. Please see the highlighted yellow in the discussion and reference list as the new changes made. Below is the new cited reference:

63. Gyimah LA, Annan RA, Apprey C, Edusei A, Aduku LNE, Asamoah-Boakye O, Azanu W. and Lutterodt H. Dietary diversity and its correlates among pregnant adolescent girls in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16(3): e0247979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247979.

Response to Academic Editor Comment

Point 1: However, the figure presented lacks few pre-requisites for a bar chart. It has been pointed out by a reviewer and even after that the revised figure does not have Y axis and there are errors. It's suggested that you can think of presenting the data in the figure in a different format and submit a revised version of the manuscript.

Response 1: Figure 1 has been revised to show Y axis and errors addressed. Also,the figure was passed through PACE for the correct ‘tif‘ figure format of Plos One. Please see figure 1 file.

Yours faithfully,

Dr. Reginald Adjetey Annan.

(Corresponding Author).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Second_revision_Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Leeberk Raja

5 Apr 2021

Factors associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Kumasi, Ghana: A hospital-based prospective cohort study

PONE-D-20-21782R2

Dear Dr. Annan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Leeberk Raja, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Leeberk Raja

14 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-21782R2

Factors associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia among pregnant teenagers in Ashanti Region, Ghana: A hospital-based prospective cohort study

Dear Dr. Annan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Leeberk Raja

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Relationship between sociodemographic and haemoglobin status.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-21782_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-21782_reviewer with comments.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review_of_PONE.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-21782_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Second_revision_Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because it contains sensitive identifying information. However, data are available from the Committee on Human Research, Publication, and Ethics (CHRPE), the ethics board of the School of Medical Sciences of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, KNUST and Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kumasi, Ghana (Email: chrpe.knust.kath@gmail.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES