Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Apr 28;32(5):S137. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.326

Abstract No. 517 Virtual follow-up of percutaneous drains placed in interventional radiology during the COVID-19 pandemic

R Parikh 1, M Dagli 1
PMCID: PMC8079617

Purpose

Evaluate a virtual platform to track percutaneous drains in real-time to guide IR drain management during phase I (pre-resurgence) and II (resurgence) of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods

A prospective review of all patients undergoing percutaneous drain placement in IR between March and August 2020 was carried out (n = 98). All patients undergoing percutaneous drainage of a fluid collection with eventual discharge to home were included. Those with indwelling tubes at the end of the study period were excluded (n = 20). A total of 78 drains met inclusion criteria. Patients were instructed on how to utilize the virtual log, which included daily drain outputs, presence/absence of leakage (spontaneous or with flushing), and daily body temperature prior to discharge. This virtual log was accessed by patients through the patient portal via a computer or smart phone and was integrated into the electronic medical record for provider review. A Fisher’s exact test was used to compare percent compliance during phase I and phase II. Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to compare mean time to tube removal (mTTR).

Results

Compliance with virtual drain log usage was 30.8% [24/78] with no significant difference between phase I and II (P > 0.05). mTTR ± SE was 44.7 ± 7.1 days in patients who did not use the virtual log, compared with 36.9 ± 8.2 days in patients who did use the virtual log with a difference of 7.8 days, which did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference of 30.6 days in overall mTTR between phase I and phase II (P = 0.007) with a significant difference of 34.5 days between phase I and phase II in the sub-group that did not use the virtual drain log (P = 0.018). There was no significant difference between phase I and phase II in the group that used the virtual drain log.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a significantly increased mTTR in patients who did not use a virtual drain log during the most restrictive phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual platforms to guide clinical decision making are important tools in health care delivery, particularly with increasing utilization of telehealth services.


Articles from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES