Bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for poor bowel preparation in patients who undergo colonoscopy, because of their decreased intestinal transit and slow gastric emptying. This might lead to neoplastic or preneoplastic lesions being missed, longer procedural time, a higher risk of procedure-related adverse events, significant cost burden, patient dissatisfaction, and the need for a repeat colonoscopy. Multiple strategies have been suggested to improve bowel preparation in these patients. Proposed pharmacologic strategies include adding magnesium citrate, bisacodyl, lubiprostone or pyridostigmine. Non-pharmacologic strategies include preferential procedure scheduling or using a diabetes-specific preparation protocol. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the literature and provide specific recommendations to general practitioners and gastroenterologists for improving bowel preparation in patients with diabetes.

Introduction

Colonoscopy is a routine gastrointestinal diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that provides a direct visualization of the colonic lumen. It can be used for the diagnosis and management of different colonic disorders as well as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) [1]. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines consider colonoscopy as a first-tier test for CRC screening, and about 17 million colonoscopies are performed annually in the United States (US) [2]. A complete colonoscopy requires cecal intubation and adequate preparation in order to visualize the entire colonic mucosa [3,4]. Patients with inadequate bowel preparation should undergo a repeat colonoscopy within 1 year [4]. Diabetic patients are at greater risk of having inadequate bowel perpetration, which can lead to missed neoplastic or preneoplastic lesions, longer procedural time, a greater risk of procedure-related adverse events, significant cost burden, and patient dissatisfaction [1,3,5]. The risk of inadequate bowel preparation in diabetic patients has been attributed to several factors, and physicians’ awareness of possible interventions can mitigate the risk of inadequate bowel preparation in these patients.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and bowel preparation

DM has been found in multiple studies to be an independent risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 67 studies by Gandhi et al showed that DM had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.79 for inadequate bowel preparation (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-2.09; P=0.001; I2=54%) [6]. Similarly, another systematic review and meta-analysis by Mahmood et al reported that DM was a risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.43-0.79; P<0.001; I2=85%) [7]. Sensitivity analysis showed that DM was associated with inadequate bowel preparation, whether split-dose (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.48-0.92; P=0.01) or conventional bowel preparation (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.24-0.80; P<0.001) was used. In addition, sensitivity analysis showed that DM was significantly associated with poor bowel preparation in studies performed in western countries (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.49-0.82; P<0.001), while studies performed in Asian countries did not show an association (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.15-1.45; P=0.19). This difference between the 2 populations might be explained by the differences in dietary habits, as Asian populations are thought to have more fibers and spicy food in their diet [7]. In addition, the differences in the prevalence of other risk factors for poor bowel preparation might also play a role [7].

The exact mechanism and pathophysiology behind inadequate bowel preparation in diabetic patients remain incompletely understood. However, it has been suggested that decreased intestinal transit and slow gastric emptying may play a major role [8]. These gastrointestinal dysfunctions may be due to changes in the microenvironment of the autonomic nervous system, the enteric nervous system and the intestinal cells of Cajal [9]. These changes include increased oxidative stress due to an excess of reactive oxygen species, a reduction in growth factors, changes in enteric microbiota, and alterations in signaling pathways and endothelial dysfunction [9].

Multiple studies have evaluated diabetic patients’ characteristics to determine the risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation (Table 1). Some of these studies were small and the results were mostly inconsistent. Four of these studies showed that hemoglobin A1C had no significant relationship with the quality of bowel preparation [10-13]. Body mass index also had no significant relationship with the quality of bowel preparation, according to 3 studies [12-14]. A higher level of fasting plasma glucose was significantly associated with poorer bowel preparation in 2 small studies [12,14].

Table 1.

Summary of risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation in diabetic patients

The role of hypoglycemic medications in causing poor bowel preparation in diabetic patients has still not been widely investigated. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are commonly used hypoglycemic medications known to prolong gastrointestinal transit time [15]. However, a retrospective study by Sharma et al found no significant association between the use of GLP-1 agonists and poor bowel preparation [15].

Dietary habits might have an effect on colonic transit time and, in turn, on the quality of bowel preparation in diabetic patients. This might explain why DM was associated with poor bowel preparation in western countries compared to Asian countries, based on the meta-analysis mentioned above [7]. It might also explain the improvement in bowel preparation associated with adopting a special menu in the Alvarez study, which will be detailed later in this article [16].

Pharmacologic interventions for improving bowel preparation in diabetics

Several interventions have been studied or suggested to improve the quality of bowel preparation in diabetic patients (Tables 2,3). However, the absence of specific society guidelines and the lack of strong and consistent evidence have left patients and clinicians in a dilemma. The US Multi-Society Task Force on CRC recommended considering additional bowel purgatives in patients with risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation [5]. The ASGE also recommends that intensive education and bowel preparation regimens more aggressive than the standard ones should be considered when a risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation exists [3]. In the following paragraphs, we will review studies that have attempted to implement or suggest interventions that might improve the quality of bowel preparation in diabetic patients.

Table 2.

Evidence-based summary of interventions suggested to improve bowel preparation in patients with diabetes

Table 3.

Major studies addressing bowel preparation in diabetic patients

Lubiprostone

Lubiprostone is a chloride channel activator that increases fluid secretion in the intestines and, in turn, increases fecal transit [5]. Lubiprostone is approved for use in patients with chronic constipation and also for patients who suffer from irritable bowel syndrome with constipation [17]. While lubiprostone is not routinely given as a part of bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy, multiple studies have assessed its efficacy when added to polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution, with mixed results [18-20]. Grigg et al enrolled 60 diabetic patients in a single-blinded randomized trial that compared giving 2 doses of lubiprostone (24 mg) in addition to a single dose of PEG (2 h prior to PEG and 2 h after PEG completion) versus giving PEG alone [17]. While the study showed more favorable results in the group that received lubiprostone, the results were not statically significant. The study was stopped early because of loss of funding, which resulted in a small sample size. Therefore, there is no strong evidence to support the routine use of lubiprostone to improve bowel preparation in diabetic patients.

Magnesium citrate

Magnesium citrate is an over-the-counter hyperosmotic laxative that acts by causing osmotic intraluminal fluid and electrolyte retention, leading to increased peristalsis of the small intestines and the colon [3]. Magnesium citrate is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a colonoscopy preparation agent and there is limited evidence about its efficacy as a standalone agent. Hayes et al performed a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial involving 198 diabetics, mostly male patients, undergoing outpatient colonoscopy to evaluate the efficacy of adding magnesium citrate to the standard bowel preparation [21]. There was significantly better bowel preparation in patients who received magnesium citrate plus PEG compared to patients who received PEG alone (70% vs. 54%; P=0.02). The overall rate of good bowel preparation was lower than desired because of the use of single dose PEG in both groups, not supported by the current ASGE guidelines [3].

While Hayes et al reported no significant adverse effects in their study, the ASGE is currently recommending against the routine use of magnesium citrate in preparation for colonoscopy, given its potential side effects and the limited data related to its use [3]. The ASGE recommends against its use in patients with chronic kidney disease, a common complication of DM [3]. In addition, the ASGE recommends avoiding it in elderly patients, patients with congestive heart failure or decompensated cirrhosis, or patients taking medications that alter renal blood flow or electrolyte excretion [3,22].

Bisacodyl

Bisacodyl is a prokinetic laxative derived from diphenylmethane. Its active metabolite works mainly on the colon, as it is poorly absorbed in the small intestines [23]. Bisacodyl has been used for the treatment of constipation since 1952, and it has also been used to reduce the volume of lavage solution used prior to colonoscopy [3,23]. In a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial by Madhoun et al, 212 adult diabetic patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to 3 intervention groups: split-dose 4 L PEG electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) preceded by 10 mg of oral bisacodyl (SDBP-B), split-dose 4 L PEG-ELS (SDBP) and a single dose of 4 L PEG-ELS (CDP) [1]. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation quality, defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score ≥6 with no segmental score <2, or subjective rating by the endoscopist as “good” or “excellent”. The primary outcome was highest in the SDBP group (83.3%) followed by the SDBP-B group (74.6%) and the CDP group (66.7%). However, the results were not statistically significant (P=0.1). This study, performed at a veteran’s affairs hospital with a predominantly male population, shows that adding bisacodyl to the split-dose bowel preparation is unlikely to improve the quality of bowel preparation in diabetic patients. The results of this study are consistent with the general impression that adding prokinetic agents to bowel preparation does not improve bowel cleansing [3].

Pyridostigmine

Neostigmine and pyridostigmine are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors that can increase acetylcholine levels at the synapses, which can lead to increased colonic motility. Neostigmine has been used for the treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome). Pyridostigmine, in a small study, has been found to increase colonic transit and improve bowel function in diabetic patients with chronic constipation [24]. Pyridostigmine bromide was suggested for use in bowel preparation in diabetic patients with constipation [25]. However, there are no studies to support the efficacy or safety of pyridostigmine in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in either diabetic or non-diabetic patients. Moreover, the addition of prokinetic medications in general is not thought to be useful in improving bowel cleansing or patient tolerance [3].

Glycemic control

While DM is a known factor that can affect the quality of bowel preparation, it is unclear if attempting to achieve glycemic control prior to colonoscopy would provide any benefit. A retrospective study of 352 diabetic patients by Izzy et al showed that there was no significant relationship between the quality of preparation or adenoma detection and A1C levels [11]. Another retrospective study of 380 diabetic patients by Lankalapalli et al showed that glycemic control based on recent A1C level and mean blood glucose concentration had no significant effect on bowel preparation quality [13].

Procedure timing

There have been multiple studies that investigated the effect of the colonoscopy timing on the adequacy of the bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate (ADR), with variable results [26]. One retrospective study reported that afternoon colonoscopies had a higher rate of inadequate bowel preparation and 2 other studies reported a better ADR with morning colonoscopies [26-28]. Endoscopist fatigue was suggested to be a factor influencing the lower ADR in later colonoscopies [26,29]. Nevertheless, other studies have found no significant association between colonoscopy timing and ADR [30-32].

Current ASGE guidelines recommend split-dose bowel preparation, with the second dose ideally beginning 4-6 h before the time of colonoscopy, with completion at least 2 h before the procedure time [3]. This is challenging and usually inconvenient to patients undergoing early morning colonoscopies, as it would require the patients to wake up very early to take the second dose.

Diabetic patients are usually advised to schedule their surgeries in the early morning to avoid prolonged fasting and subsequent hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia [33-35]. However, there is no strong evidence to support this early scheduling [36]. In addition, the American Society of Anesthesiologists allows the intake of clear liquid diet up to a minimum of 2 h prior to a scheduled procedure under sedation or general anesthesia [37]. Therefore, allowing patients to have a clear liquid diet up to 2 h before later colonoscopies might decrease the risk of hypoglycemia. A limiting factor for this practice is the possibility of the patient having undiagnosed gastroparesis, which might require a longer period of fasting.

Only one study investigated the effect of colonoscopy timing on bowel preparation quality in diabetic patients [38]. In this cohort study, the investigators preferentially scheduled patients with DM to have screening colonoscopies at 9:30 am or later. All patients (diabetics and non-diabetics) received split dose 4-L PEG preparation. The patients scheduled at 9:30 am or later received the second dose 5 h before their appointments, while patients scheduled before 9:30 am received all bowel preparation on the day before their colonoscopies. All patients were instructed to start a low-fiber diet 4 days before the procedure and then switch to a clear liquid diet on the day prior to the procedure. Investigators then compared data obtained from colonoscopies performed after starting this preferential scheduling with those carried out previously. Investigators concluded that the preferential scheduling allowed more adequate bowel preparation in diabetic patients while not disadvantaging other non-diabetic patients. Hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic events were not reported. The results of this study contradict other studies done in the general population (diabetic and non-diabetic patients) and showed either a worse outcome or no difference when colonoscopies were scheduled at later times. In addition, there was a huge difference in the time intervals compared in this study (before 9:30 am versus after 9:30 am) and this places a question mark on the results and the applicability of this study.

DM-specific preparation protocol

Alvarez et al, in a randomized controlled superiority trial, were the first ones to develop a multifactorial diabetic-specific preparation (DSP) protocol to improve bowel preparation for colonoscopy in diabetic patients. The DSP protocol included a face-to-face educational visit at the hospital with a qualified nurse. It also included a specific dietary plan developed by an endocrinologist and a registered dietitian, consisting of a 4-day menu that specified low-fiber carbohydrate intake in each meal, while a liquid diet was limited only to 8 h before the procedure. Lastly, the DSP protocol also included instructions for adjustment of blood glucose-lowering agents.

In contrast, the control group received conventional bowel preparation protocol (CBP): no educational visit, low-fiber diet for 3 days and then clear liquid diet for 24 h before colonoscopy; lastly, no specific recommendations were given to adjust blood glucose-lowering agents. Both groups, DSP and CBP, received split-dose 4-L PEG solution. Inadequate bowel preparation, defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score <2 in any segment, was 20% in the CBD group compared with 7% in the DSP group (P=0.014; risk ratio 3.1, 95%CI 1.2-8). However, there was no significant difference in cecal intubation rate or in ADR between the 2 groups. The authors argued that the association between the quality of bowel preparation and ADR has not been firmly established.

While it is unclear which arm of the multifactorial DSP protocol had the largest impact on improving bowel preparation, it is possible that the dietary recommendation of a low-fiber diet had some role in improving bowel preparation. A clear liquid diet had been commonly advised for the day before the colonoscopy and it is unclear whether this practice provided any significant benefit to bowel preparation or tolerability [3]. Growing evidence from multiple studies suggests that a more liberalized diet (low-residue diet) on the day before colonoscopy provides better tolerability and better or similar bowel preparation quality [5]. Current ASGE guidelines recommend a low-residue diet before colonoscopy, whereas the US Multi-Society Task Force on CRC recommends either low-residue or full-liquid diet until the evening on the day before colonoscopy [3,5].

Applying the DSP protocol might be difficult, especially in areas or countries with limited resources. A successful DSP intervention would require using a food menu derived from the available food in the local markets. The menu should also contain food options that are affordable, have acceptable flavors, and are within the local religious food restrictions. This will require consulting with local dietitians, endocrinologists and local market experts. In addition, the menu might need to be translated into multiple languages if they are spoken in the community. Lastly, finding qualified nurses familiar with the local dietary habits is also an integral part of the process.

Concluding remarks

DM is associated with suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Several studies attempted to optimize bowel preparation in these patients. However, these studies vary in the strength of their evidence, and most of them did not use split-dosing regimens, which are part of the current ASGE recommendation (Table 3). While the DSP protocol used in the study of Alvarez et al seems to offer the best intervention published to date, more studies are needed to confirm the results of this study and compare this intervention to other optimized preparations. Additionally, studies are needed to identify risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation in diabetic populations and possibly intervene to mitigate these factors.

Taking into consideration the limitations of the available evidence, we recommend the following interventions: (a) counseling diabetic patients about the possibility of having an inadequate bowel preparation; (b) extensive counseling from well-trained nurses (or other qualified healthcare professionals) about preparation intake, dietary recommendations and specific adjustments of antihyperglycemic agents should be offered to all diabetic patients. Instructions should be provided in an oral and a written fashion in the patients’ preferred language; (c) split dosing is recommended for all diabetic patients. Avoidance of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate is also recommended, given the prevalence of renal disease in this population; (d) adding prokinetics such as bisacodyl to a bowel preparation regimen is discouraged, given the lack of evidence of any benefit and the possible harm; (e) consider recommending low-residue diets to all diabetic patients on the days before colonoscopy; and (f) consider consulting with the patient’s primary care provider or endocrinologist, especially if the patient is taking multiple antihyperglycemic agents.

Biography

Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona; St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA