Skip to main content
Experimental & Molecular Medicine logoLink to Experimental & Molecular Medicine
. 2020 Dec 9;52(12):1926–1935. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-00540-4

Interactions between tumor-derived proteins and Toll-like receptors

Gun-Young Jang 1, Ji won Lee 1, Young Seob Kim 1, Sung Eun Lee 1, Hee Dong Han 1, Kee-Jong Hong 2, Tae Heung Kang 1,, Yeong-Min Park 1,
PMCID: PMC8080774  PMID: 33299138

Abstract

Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are danger signals (or alarmins) alerting immune cells through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to begin defense activity. Moreover, DAMPs are host biomolecules that can initiate a noninflammatory response to infection, and pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs) perpetuate the inflammatory response to infection. Many DAMPs are proteins that have defined intracellular functions and are released from dying cells after tissue injury or chemo-/radiotherapy. In the tumor microenvironment, DAMPs can be ligands for Toll-like receptors (TLRs) expressed on immune cells and induce cytokine production and T-cell activation. Moreover, DAMPs released from tumor cells can directly activate tumor-expressed TLRs that induce chemoresistance, migration, invasion, and metastasis. Furthermore, DAMP-induced chronic inflammation in the tumor microenvironment causes an increase in immunosuppressive populations, such as M2 macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Therefore, regulation of DAMP proteins can reduce excessive inflammation to create an immunogenic tumor microenvironment. Here, we review tumor-derived DAMP proteins as ligands of TLRs and discuss their association with immune cells, tumors, and the composition of the tumor microenvironment.

Subject terms: Immune cell death, Cancer microenvironment

Cancer: Boosting the right signals to suppress tumors

Tumor cells killed by radiotherapy or chemotherapy release signaling molecules that stimulate both immune response and tumor aggressiveness; regulating these molecules could improve treatment efficacy. Tae Heung Kang, Yeong-Min Park, and co-workers at Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea, have reviewed the role of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in immunity and cancer. These signaling molecules act as danger signals, activating immune cells by binding to specific receptors. However, tumor cells have the same receptors, and DAMPs binding triggers chemoresistance and increases invasiveness. The researchers report that although DAMPs can trigger a helpful immune response, they can also cause chronic inflammation, which in turn promotes an immune suppression response, allowing tumors to escape immune detection. Improving our understanding of the functions of different DAMPs could improve our ability to boost the immune response and decrease tumor aggressiveness.

Introduction

Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), also known as danger-associated molecular patterns, are endogenous molecules released from dying cells that activate the immune system by interacting with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)1. DAMPs contribute to host defense through inflammation induced by immune cells, though they are also related to autoimmune disease when chronically induced2. After chemotherapy or radiotherapy, tumor-derived DAMPs interact with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that activate immune cells and produce inflammatory cytokines3. These pro-inflammatory cytokines mediate innate and adaptive immunity through autocrine secretion by immune cells. Moreover, these inflammatory cytokines directly induce tumor-derived secretory proteins that also stimulate paracrine secretion of inflammatory cytokines by immune cells. However, chronic inflammation ultimately increases the population of immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment and elevates the expression of immune checkpoint molecules that allow tumors to evade immune responses. Recently, it has been reported that tumor-derived DAMP proteins directly increase endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is responsible for tumor metastasis1,4. Furthermore, TLR-overexpressing tumors have been shown to result in a poor prognosis for cancer patients5. Indeed, tumor-derived DAMP proteins bind to TLRs expressed on tumors and activate downstream signaling that is associated with tumor migration, invasion, and metastasis6,7. Here, we suggest that DAMPs are known to be associated with immune cells, but they could be important mediators between immune cells and tumors because tumor-derived secretory proteins can induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by immune cells and directly increase the aggressive characteristics of tumors through TLRs (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Interplay among DAMP proteins from dead cells, TLRs on immune cells, and cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment.

Fig. 1

Anticancer drugs and irradiation induce apoptosis or necrosis in tumor cells. Several DAMP proteins (HMGB1, S100, HSP, API5, PAUF, RPS3, etc.) released from dying tumor cells stimulate immune cells or tumor cells after binding Toll-like receptors expressed on both of these cell types. Activated mature immune cells such as dendritic cells initiate adaptive immunity by educating tumor-specific T cells and secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β, IFN-β, etc.) that induce the secretion of DAMP proteins from tumor cells. TLR axis signaling in tumor cells induces the transcription of genes related to cell proliferation, chemotherapeutic resistance, invasion, and metastasis in tissues (e.g., lung tissue). In addition, tumors usually escape the immune response by altering the tumor microenvironment with immunosuppressive populations (Treg cells, MDSCs, M2 macrophages, etc.) and secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β, etc.).

DAMP proteins released from dying cells

DAMPs are danger signals that are released from dying or necrotic cells and are also actively secreted from cells by external stimulation (e.g., high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein)811. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy usually induces the release of DAMP proteins following tumor apoptosis or necrosis1215. Tumor-derived DAMP proteins are expressed in various tumor types (Table 1). As a well-known DAMP molecule, HMGB1 can be passively released from damaged cells or actively secreted from activated immune cells through a leaderless secretory pathway1619. Tang et al.19 reported that HMGB1, present in almost all metazoans and plants and first identified as a chromatin-associated protein, is a highly conserved nuclear protein that acts as a chromatin-binding factor that binds DNA and facilitates the assembly of transcriptional proteins on specific DNA targets. Moreover, HMGB1 has been implicated in disease states, including sepsis, ischemia-reperfusion, arthritis, meningitis, neurodegeneration, aging, and cancer2026. In addition, it is associated with all of the central hallmarks of cancer and is released from tumor cells when induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy2729. Napolitano et al.30 assessed the serum levels of HMGB1 to reliably distinguish malignant mesothelioma patients, asbestos-exposed individuals, and unexposed controls. Total HMGB1 was significantly increased in malignant mesothelioma patients and asbestos-exposed individuals compared with healthy controls. Naumnik et al.31 investigated the prognostic role and effects of chemotherapy on HMGB1 serum levels in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After four cycles of chemotherapy, the mean serum HMGB1 levels in peripheral blood samples were significantly higher in patients with advanced NSCLC than in controls. Moreover, it has been shown that a DAMP protein, HMGB1, functions in a manner depending on the oxidative status. Tang et al.32 noted that HMGB1 is integral to oxidative stress and downstream apoptosis or survival. When HMGB1 accumulates at sites of oxidative DNA damage, it can lead to DNA repair. Both reduced and oxidized HMGB1 have been shown to perform different functions in extracellular signaling and regulation of the immune response through Toll-like receptors. HMGB1 released from injured or necrotic cells or secreted from inflammatory cells triggers immune responses after binding receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) or Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 or TLR4, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) and CD24, which stimulates cell migration, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation.

Table 1.

The expression of tumor-derived DAMP proteins in various tumor types.

DAMPs Tumor type Function Reference
HMGB1

Prostate cancer

Malignant mesothelioma

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Colon carcinoma

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Mammary carcinoma

Fibrosarcoma

Lymphoma

Osteosarcoma

Melanoma

Lewis lung carcinoma

Inducing adaptive immune response

Cell migration and proliferation

Angiogenesis

Metastasis, chemoresistance

Escape of apoptosis

Tumor-antigen processing

Presenting tumor antigen

Trigger sterile inflammation

Progression of tumors

Neutrophil recruitment

Increase autophagy

119131
S100s

Breast cancer

Fibrosarcoma

Neuroblastoma

Colon cancer

Colorectal adenocarcinoma

Cell growth

Myeloid cell infiltration

Epidermal hyperplasia

Secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines

Metastasis

131136
HSPs

Breast cancer

Colorectal cancer

Melanoma

Involve in protein folding

Activate immune response

Metastasis

3941,46,137
Histones

Pancreatic cancer

Lung cancer

Chromatin remodeling

Gene transcription

Neutrophil migration

Endothelial injury

48,49,52,138
PAUF

Pancreatic cancer

Ovarian cancer

Pancreatic tumor development

TLR4 stimulation

Tumorigenesis

Chemoresistance

5,7,54,87
API5

Adenocarcinoma

Cervical cancer

Breast cancer

Apoptosis inhibition

Activating immune cells

5759
RPS3

Adenocarcinoma

Colorectal cancer

Melanoma

Translation initiation

Repair of UV-induced DNA damage

Adjuvant for DC-based vaccine

63,66,67

Bresnick et al.33 reported that S100 protein family members, 21 proteins with a high degree of structural similarity, act as Ca2+ sensors that can translate fluctuations in intracellular Ca2+ levels into a cellular response and participate in a wide range of biological processes, such as proliferation, migration and/or invasion, inflammation, and differentiation. The function of S100 protein family members as DAMPs has been detected in the extracellular space, as well as in serum, urine, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, and feces, and is generally associated with specific diseases, such as cancer3336. The exact secretion mechanism of S100 proteins is still unclear, as they lack a sequence responsible for secretion through the classical endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi pathway33. Harpio et al.34 noted that circulating S100B plays a role in the decision to switch treatment regimens. The concentration of circulating S100B predicts the duration of survival in melanoma patients and are very sensitive for the detection of metastatic growth of malignant melanoma, particularly at stage IV of the disease. Pedrocchi et al.37 reported that the S100 protein level is elevated in the human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MD-231 and HS-578T. Cross et al.38 described how S100 protein family members, including S100A6, S100A8, S100A9, and S100A11, are expressed in breast cancer as well as other common cancers. In addition, S100A11 may have an effect on the proliferation of cancer cells through nucleocytoplasmic translocation.

Heat shock proteins (HSPs), a large family of molecular chaperones that are involved in protein folding, are overexpressed in various types of tumors and indicate a poor prognosis and increased resistance to therapies3942. Released from dying tumor cells, they can also function as DAMP proteins to activate the immune system. In fact, the serum concentration of HSPs is elevated in cancer patients4345. Fanelli et al.39 reported that the serum levels of the HSP Mr 27,000 (Hsp27), in breast cancer patients were higher than those in control patients. Chen et al.46 reported that serum concentrations of HSP90α in colorectal cancer patients were significantly higher than those in normal volunteers.

Histones are intranuclear cationic proteins that are present in all eukaryotic cells47. They act as DAMP proteins by activating the immune system through TLRs after being released into the extracellular space in response to injury or sepsis14,4851. Chen et al.48 reported that histones are important in chromatin remodeling and gene transcription via posttranslational modifications. In addition, histones function as DAMPs when they translocate from the nucleus to the extracellular space, binding to receptors and activating various signaling pathways in a monomeric or multimeric manner. Moreover, ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) or drug-induced tissue injury results in sterile inflammation, and serum histone levels are significantly elevated in animal models of liver, kidney, lung, and brain injury. In addition, serum histone levels were found to be elevated in sepsis, and the H3 and H4 elements were the major components responsible for toxicity. In fact, the concentration of intracellular calcium is increased by the transient presence of exogenous histones in endothelial cells; histone administration in vivo causes neutrophil migration, endothelial injury and dysfunction, hemorrhage, and thrombosis, which finally results in animal death. Histones such as DAMPs can be released from dying or necrotic tumor cells52. Patwa et al.49 identified histone H4 in serum from pancreatic cancer patients.

Moreover, pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor (PAUF) is a ligand of TLRs that is involved in pancreatic tumor development5,7,53. PAUF is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and acts as a DAMP protein, with resulting active secretion54. Kim et al.54 determined that PAUF is a novel upregulated secretory protein in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma—enhanced expression of PAUF mRNA and protein was observed in pancreatic cancer cell lines compared to normal cells. Furthermore, this group confirmed PAUF expression and secretion in lysates and culture medium by immunoreaction with anti-rhPAUF antibodies. Expression of PAUF was also confirmed in human pancreatic cancer tissues by immunohistochemical staining. As a ligand of TLR4, apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API5) is an apoptosis inhibitory protein that prevents apoptosis induced by the transcription factor E2F1 and interacts with a nuclear factor involved in apoptotic DNA fragmentation5557. For instance, API5 is associated with diseases, including adenocarcinoma and cervical cancer58,59. It can be released from tumor cells and functions as a DAMP protein activating immune cells57. Cho et al.58 established that API5 is overexpressed in cervical cancer, with prognostic significance. By generating Kaplan–Meier plots, this group indicated that API5 expression is an important prognostic factor in human cervical cancer; high API5 expression reflected significantly shorter disease-free survival and overall survival times.

40S ribosomal protein S3 (RPS3) is a ribosomal protein component of the 40S subunit, which contains the domain responsible for translation initiation6062. The RPS3 protein is involved in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage6365. The expression levels of RPS3 in adenocarcinomas and adenomatous polyps were found to be higher than those in adjacent normal colonic mucosa66. Kim et al.66 reported that RPS3 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer cells, suggesting the relationship between this protein and tumorigenesis. This group showed that the secretion of dimeric RPS3 into the extracellular space and the secretion levels of RPS3 were obviously higher in malignant cancer cells than in normal cells. They demonstrated that RPS3 is secreted into cell culture medium via the ER-Golgi-dependent pathway, as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Park et al.67 reported that RPS3 is a housekeeping protein that is expressed in all eukaryotic cells and is released from tumor cells by exposure to anticancer drugs. To this end, they specifically confirmed the release of RPS3 from B16F1 and B16F10 melanoma cancer cell lines into culture medium through western blotting.

In summary, various DAMP proteins are released from dying cells by tissue injury or chemo-/radiotherapy-induced apoptosis, and these DAMP proteins are associated with various diseases and functions through multiple signaling pathways.

Interaction of tumor-derived DAMP proteins with TLRs

DAMPs have been described as ligands for TLRs, known as PRRs, which initiate an inflammatory response6872. The biological structure of TLRs comprises an extracellular transmembrane domain composed of multiple leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) and an intracellular signaling domain featuring a Toll-IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain7375. Regarding intracellular signaling, myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), MyD88 adapter-like (Mal) protein, TIR-related adapter protein inducing IFN-β (TRIF), and TRIF-related adapter molecule (TRAM) are involved in activating immune cell responses76. TLRs are expressed in immune cells, such as macrophages and DCs, which are involved in innate immunity7779 (Table 2). Innate immune cells produce inflammatory cytokines, and costimulatory molecules are increasingly expressed after a ligand, such as a DAMP protein, activates TLR signaling80,81. In particular, TLR2 and TLR4 are receptors triggered by a variety of endogenous DAMPs to induce an inflammatory response81. As mentioned earlier, HMGB1 is actively secreted from inflammatory immune cells or passively released by necrotic cells to signal tissue damage and initiate immune responses by binding to receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), TLR2, or TLR4. Gary et al.18 reported that HMGB1 is a DNA-binding nuclear protein that is released actively by cytokine stimulation and passively during cell death and has been implicated in several inflammatory diseases, as it is a prototypical DAMP protein. Furthermore, this group identified the relationship between HMGB1 and TLR4, in which HMGB1 plays an important role in the activation of DCs through TLR4 for efficient presentation of tumor antigens from dying cells. Moreover, stimulation of RAGE-transfected HT1080 cells with HMGB1 induces the activation of ERK1/2 signaling downstream of RAGE. Wang et al.82 described how HMGB1 is associated with TLR4 in drug-induced damage-associated lethal hepatitis. In addition, the serum HMGB1 concentration was found to rise after treatment with acetaminophen. The interaction between HMGB1 and TLR4 was confirmed by stimulating macrophages from TLR4+/+ or TLR4−/− mice with soluble HMGB1; the production of IL-23 increased only with TLR4+/+ macrophages. Curtin et al.83 reported that HMGB1 mediates endogenous TLR2 activation in brain tumors. The supernatants from dying Ad-TK + GCV-treated GL26 tumor cells indicated that TLR2-dependent NFκB activation was inhibited when tumor cells were treated with glycyrrhizin, an antagonist of HMGB1.

Table 2.

The expressions and functions of TLRs in various immune cells.

Immune cells TLR type Function Reference
CD8+ T cell TLR 2

Cytokine secretion

Enhance proliferation

139,140
CD4+ T cell TLR 2, 5, 7, 8

Cytokine secretion

Enhance proliferation

139,140
γδ+ T cell TLR 2, 3 IFNγ production 139,140
Treg

TLR 2/8

TLR 2/5

Reduced suppression

Enhance suppression

139,141
mDC TLR 1–10

Produce iNOS, TNF-α, IL-1β

Upregulation of CD40, CD80, CD86, CCR7

142144
pDC TLR 7, 9, 10

Upregulation of CD40, CD80, CD86, CCR7

Produce IFNα

143,144
Macrophage TLR 1–9 Produce pro-inflammatory cytokines 142,145
Mast cell TLR 2, 4, 6, 8 Produce pro-inflammatory cytokines 142,146,147
Neutrophil TLR 1–4, 6, 7, 9

Produce TNF-α

ROS generation

Increase survival

142,148
B cell TLR 2–4, 6, 9

Secrete antibodies

Development and differentiation

142,149

Alarmin eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is known to use TLR2 as its receptor for activation of immune cells84. Yang et al.84 reported that EDN acts as an alarmin and activates TLR2-MyD88 signaling in dendritic cells. Furthermore, EDN was observed to induce an increase in luciferase activity in HEK293 cells expressing TLR2. In addition, the production of IL-6 in response to EDN was decreased in supernatants from TLR2−/− DCs.

HSPs, as described previously, are released by necrotic cells or secreted via nonclassical pathways to convey a danger signal to surrounding cells, which is followed by binding to TLR2 or TLR4 to induce inflammation. Zhao et al.85 determined that heat-shock protein 60 (hsp60) induces IL-8 via the TLR2 and MAPK pathways in human monocytes. The concentration of NK-κB in NOMO1 cells was significantly reduced by pretreatment with an anti-TLR2 antibody before stimulation with recombinant hsp60 protein. Roelof et al.86 identified heat shock protein B8 (HSP22) as a novel TLR4 ligand and its involvement in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. DC maturation by HSPB8 stimulation was inhibited in the presence of a TLR4 antagonist, and the expression levels of CD80, CD83, CD86, and MHC-II were decreased.

PAUF has been identified as an endogenous ligand of TLR2 and TLR4. Park et al.7 confirmed the specificity of the PAUF-TLR2 interaction, where PAUF induces ERK phosphorylation and activates the IKK-β-mediated TPL2/MEK/ERK signaling pathway through TLR2. Furthermore, TLR2 coimmunoprecipitated with PAUF formed by glycosylation, and preincubation of THP-1 cells with an anti-TLR2 antibody resulted in a significant decrease in the level of PAUF protein binding to TLR2. Kang et al.87 reported that PAUF functions as an adjuvant by activating DCs through TLR4. This group demonstrated PAUF-induced activation and maturation of DCs with activation of NF-κB through the TLR signaling pathway. To confirm the dependency of TLR4 and PAUF, the binding affinity of the PAUF protein for TLR4 was evaluated by a Blitz assay, and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted from DCs lacking TLR4 were found to be reduced after treatment with PAUF.

Apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API5), which is overexpressed in many types of tumors, interacts with TLR4 and induces an inflammatory response. Kim et al.57 established that API5 activates antigen-presenting cells in a TLR4-dependent manner. Via western blotting, this group confirmed the release of API5 from chemically stressed cells of various murine and human cancer cell lines. Immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that API5 binds to TLR4 but not TLR2, and luciferase activity was increased in HEK293 cells after PAUF treatment. Moreover, activation and maturation of mouse and human DCs were observed after treatment with the PAUF protein, but the results were reversed in DCs lacking TLR4.

Furthermore, ribosomal family proteins have been shown to activate immune cells after binding to TLR4 and to induce inflammation within the tumor microenvironment. Park et al.67 reported that RPS3, a DAMP protein, is a novel adjuvant for DC-based vaccines, inducing maturation and activation of DCs through TLR4. The interaction between RPS3 and TLR4 was confirmed by a Blitz assay, and luciferase activity was found to be increased in HEK293 cells. Moreover, after treatment with RPS3, the maturation and activation of TLR4−/− DCs were reduced compared to those of TLR4+/+ DCs.

Therefore, DAMP proteins are released from dying cells or tumor cells after chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and they bind and activate immune cells through TLRs to convey danger signals by initiating inflammatory immune responses.

DAMP proteins act as mediators between immune cells and tumors through TLRs

DAMP proteins from dying or apoptotic cells can both activate immune cells to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and stimulate tumor cells to be aggressive by promoting metastasis. These two cell subsets can be affected by TLRs reacting with DAMP proteins. Therefore, DAMP proteins can act as mediators between TLR-expressing immune cells and tumors.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy induce tumor recurrence and metastasis even though most tumor cells are destroyed by apoptosis13,88,89. Moreover, tumor cells express functional TLRs that play important roles in their proliferation, apoptosis resistance, invasion, and metastasis9092 (Table 3). Volk-Draper et al.93 reported that paclitaxel therapy promotes breast cancer metastasis via TLR4 signaling. The levels of inflammatory cytokines were increased in nab-PXL-treated TLR4+/+ tumors compared to untreated and nab-PXL-treated TLR4−/− tumors. In fact, various types of cancer involve overexpression of TLRs, with poor prognosis in patients. Cammarota et al.94 observed that TLR4 expression is a potential prognostic marker in colorectal cancer, and the expression of TLR4 was associated with adenocarcinoma in human samples and a murine model. Increased TLR4 expression in the stromal compartment was associated with a significantly increased risk of disease progression, and significant tumor relapse occurred earlier in colon cancer patients with very high levels of TLR4 than in those with lower expression levels.

Table 3.

The expressions and functions of TLRs in various tumors.

Tumor type TLR type Function Reference
Ovarian cancer TLR 2–5, 9

Immunosuppression

Tumor growth

Increased migration

Resistance to chemotherapy

6,150152
Cervical cancer TLR 3–5, 7, 9

Tumorigenesis

Tumor growth

Resistance to chemotherapy

152155
Lung cancer TLR 2–4, 9

Prolong cancer cell survival

Immune escape

Apoptosis resistance

Tumor metastasis

104,156,157
Colorectal cancer TLR 2–5, 9

Tumorigenesis

Antitumor activity

Cancer proliferation

Angiogenesis

Inhibit tumor necrosis

158162
Melanoma TLR 2–4

Tumor migration

Tumor progression

Prolong cancer cell survival

163,164
Breast cancer TLR 2–4, 9 Tumor invasion 105,165
Brain cancer TLR 2, 4

Tumor progression

Tumor metastasis

166,167
Prostate cancer TLR 4, 9

Tumor invasion

Carcinogenesis

168,169
Gastric cancer TLR 2, 4, 5, 9

Tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis

Angiogenesis

Attenuate antitumor activity

170172

TLRs are conventionally known to be involved in the host immune response; however, it has recently been shown that TLRs are also expressed in tumor cells and influence tumor progression9598. Therefore, DAMP proteins released from tumor cells can directly induce tumors to be aggressive to promote migration, invasion, and metastasis through TLRs. Moreover, TLR signaling facilitates evasion of immune surveillance in the tumor microenvironment and contributes to resistance to anticancer drugs99101. Kelly et al.91 and Dan et al.102 reported that activation of TLR4 signaling promotes the growth of ovarian cancer with resistance to chemotherapy and leads to significant increases in the levels of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis and phosphorylated AKT. Jego et al.103 and He et al.104 described how tumor cell apoptosis is inhibited through TLR signaling in lymphoma and lung cancer. Merrell et al.105 reported that the invasion of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was promoted by increased matrix metalloproteinase activity after activation by a TLR9 agonist. Thus, activation of TLRs expressed by tumor cells is associated with tumor aggressiveness. As components of the host immune system, chemo-/radiotherapy-induced DAMP proteins activate immune cells through TLRs to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby clearing T-cell trafficking into the tumor microenvironment and ultimately clearing tumor cells. These pro-inflammatory cytokines induce autocrine secretion by immune cells in order to boost inflammation, which can result in autoimmune disease106. Moreover, these cytokines can induce paracrine secretion of secretory proteins by tumor cells, which can activate tumor cells through TLR signaling. Thus, DAMP proteins are associated with immune responses and tumor progression, and identification of DAMP proteins released from tumors is necessary to overcome autoimmune diseases or chronic inflammatory disorders such as atherosclerosis and arthritis107.

Inflammation-induced immunosuppressive populations in the tumor microenvironment

Innate immunity and adaptive immunity are involved in host defense against tumor development108. First, innate immune cells, such as macrophages and DCs, recognize tumor antigens and deliver them to T cells to activate adaptive immune responses109. During the defense against tumors, immune cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, and tumor-specific T cells produce perforin and granzyme B to clear tumor cells110. However, tumors usually escape the immune response by altering their microenvironment with immunosuppressive populations such as M2 macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs)111113. These immune cells produce suppressive cytokines (e.g., IL-10 and TGF-β) that render tumor cells aggressive and exhaust CD8+ T cells114. In fact, chemo-/radiotherapy-induced inflammation results in a suppressive tumor microenvironment that induces downregulation of host immune responses115. Moreover, DAMP proteins released from tumors can activate inhibitory immune cells that express TLRs. Song et al.116 reported that PAUF is a DAMP protein that is involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis and enhances tumor-infiltrating MDSC functional activity via the TLR4-mediated signaling pathway. Moreover, Parker et al.117 noted that HMGB1 enhances immune suppression by facilitating the differentiation and suppressive activity of MDSCs. Liu et al.118 reported that knockdown of HMGB1 induces a decrease in regulatory T cells in tumors and restores CD8+ T-cell function. In conclusion, chronic inflammation induces a tumor microenvironment comprising immunosuppressive populations, where DAMP proteins activate TLR signaling expressed by inhibitory immune cells that are polarized toward suppressive characteristics.

Concluding remarks

Tumor-derived DAMP proteins are functional in both immune cells and tumors. In immune cells, identification of DAMP proteins that bind to TLRs is important for inducing inflammatory responses. For example, DC-based vaccines require novel adjuvants that induce the maturation and activation of DCs to secrete inflammatory cytokines. In fact, DAMP proteins binding to TLR4 (e.g., HMGB1, S100, HSPs, API5, and RPS3) have been used as adjuvants for DC-based vaccines, affecting tumor prevention, treatment, and survival. In contrast, tumor progression and metastasis are associated with the inflammatory response based on the interaction between TLR signaling and DAMP proteins. Regulation of these DAMP proteins in tumors can reduce excessive inflammation to create an immunogenic tumor microenvironment. For example, neutralizing antibodies against specific DAMP proteins could be used for tumor treatment in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy to prevent immune escape. In conclusion, various DAMP proteins are released from tumor cells after apoptosis and are ligands of TLRs that initiate an immune response. As mediators between immune cells and tumors, DAMP proteins must be identified and applied for immunotherapy and cancer treatment.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (NRF-2016R1A5A2012284 and NRF-2018R1A2B6008455).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Tae Heung Kang, Email: kangiron@kku.ac.kr.

Yeong-Min Park, Email: immun3023@kku.ac.kr.

References

  • 1.Srikrishna G, Freeze HH. Endogenous damage-associated molecular pattern molecules at the crossroads of inflammation and cancer. Neoplasia. 2009;11:615–628. doi: 10.1593/neo.09284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schirrmacher V, Fournier P. Danger signals in tumor cells: a risk factor for autoimmune disease? Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2010;9:347–350. doi: 10.1586/erv.10.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patidar A, et al. DAMP-TLR-cytokine axis dictates the fate of tumor. Cytokine. 2018;104:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang J, et al. High mobility group box 1 promotes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer PC3 cells via the RAGE/NF-κB signaling pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 2018;53:659–671. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choi CH, et al. Elevated expression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor (PAUF) is associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:12161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30582-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kelly MG, et al. TLR-4 signaling promotes tumor growth and paclitaxel chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3859–3868. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park HD, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor promotes metastasis by regulating TLR/CXCR4 activation. Oncogene. 2011;30:201–211. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Erlandsson Harris H, Andersson U. Mini-review: The nuclear protein HMGB1 as a proinflammatory mediator. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004;34:1503–1512. doi: 10.1002/eji.200424916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krysko DV, et al. Emerging role of damage-associated molecular patterns derived from mitochondria in inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaczmarek A, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DmitriV. Necroptosis: the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. 2013;38:209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nace G, Evankovich J, Eid R, Tsung A. Dendritic cells and damage-associated molecular patterns: endogenous danger signals linking innate and adaptive immunity. J. Innate Immun. 2012;4:6–15. doi: 10.1159/000334245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Breugom AJ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery for patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:200–207. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71199-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carelle N, et al. Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer. 2002;95:155–163. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kepp O, et al. Molecular determinants of immunogenic cell death elicited by anticancer chemotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011;30:61–69. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ma Y, et al. How to improve the immunogenicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011;30:71–82. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9283-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Im K-I, et al. Regulation of HMGB1 release protects chemoradiotherapy-associated mucositis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:1070–1081. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0132-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pandolfi F, Altamura S, Frosali S, Conti P. Key role of DAMP in inflammation, cancer, and tissue repair. Clin. Therapeutics. 2016;38:1017–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sims GP, Rowe DC, Rietdijk ST, Herbst R, Coyle AJ. HMGB1 and RAGE in inflammation and cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010;28:367–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang D, Kang R, Zeh HJ, 3rd, Lotze MT. High-mobility group box 1 and cancer. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2010;1799:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang H, Tracey KJ. Targeting HMGB1 in inflammation. Biochimica et. Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2010;1799:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang H, Yang H, Tracey KJ. Extracellular role of HMGB1 in inflammation and sepsis. J. Intern. Med. 2004;255:320–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tsung A, et al. The nuclear factor HMGB1 mediates hepatic injury after murine liver ischemia-reperfusion. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:1135–1143. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Andersson U, Erlandsson-Harris H. HMGB1 is a potent trigger of arthritis. J. Intern. Med. 2004;255:344–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gao H-M, et al. HMGB1 acts on microglia Mac1 to mediate chronic neuroinflammation that drives progressive neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:1081. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3732-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Davalos AR, et al. p53-dependent release of Alarmin HMGB1 is a central mediator of senescent phenotypes. J. Cell Biol. 2013;201:613–629. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201206006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang D, et al. HMGB1 release and redox regulates autophagy and apoptosis in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2010;29:5299–5310. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Campana L, Bosurgi L, Rovere-Querini P. HMGB1: a two-headed signal regulating tumor progression and immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008;20:518–523. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen X, et al. Radiotherapy-induced cell death activates paracrine HMGB1-TLR2 signaling and accelerates pancreatic carcinoma metastasis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;37:77. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0726-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rovere-Querini P, Castiglioni A. Adjuvant role for cell death during chemo- and radiotherapy of cancer? Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2008;4:27–32. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.4.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Napolitano A, et al. HMGB1 and its hyperacetylated isoform are sensitive and specific serum biomarkers to detect asbestos exposure and to identify mesothelioma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:3087. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Naumnik W, Nilklińska W, Ossolińska M, Chyczewska E. Serum levels of HMGB1, survivin, and VEGF in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer during chemotherapy. Folia histochemica et. cytobiologica. 2009;47:703–709. doi: 10.2478/v10042-009-0025-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tang D, Kang R, Zeh HJ, 3rd, Lotze MT. High-mobility group box 1, oxidative stress, and disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011;14:1315–1335. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bresnick AR, Weber DJ, Zimmer DB. S100 proteins in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:96–109. doi: 10.1038/nrc3893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harpio R, Einarsson R. S100 proteins as cancer biomarkers with focus on S100B in malignant melanoma. Clin. Biochem. 2004;37:512–518. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vrakas CN, et al. The measure of DAMPs and a role for S100A8 in recruiting suppressor cells in breast cancer lung metastasis. Immunological Investig. 2015;44:174–188. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2014.952818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Donato R. Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2003;60:540–551. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pedrocchi M, Schäfer BW, Mueller H, Eppenberger U, Heizmann CW. Expression of Ca2+-binding proteins of the S100 family in malignant human breast-cancer cell lines and biopsy samples. Int. J. Cancer. 1994;57:684–690. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910570513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cross SS, Hamdy FC, Deloulme JC, Rehman I. Expression of S100 proteins in normal human tissues and common cancers using tissue microarrays: S100A6, S100A8, S100A9 and S100A11 are all overexpressed in common cancers. Histopathology. 2005;46:256–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fanelli MA, Cuello Carrión FD, Dekker J, Schoemaker J, Ciocca DR. Serological detection of heat shock protein hsp27 in normal and breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. amp;amp; Prev. 1998;7:791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fucikova, J. et al. Prognostic and predictive value of DAMPs and DAMP-associated processes in cancer. Front. Immunol.6, 402 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Fujita Y, et al. Proteomics-based identification of autoantibody against heat shock protein 70 as a diagnostic marker in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2008;263:280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu F-H, et al. Extracellular HSPA1A promotes the growth of hepatocarcinoma by augmenting tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis-resistance. Cancer Lett. 2012;317:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ren B, et al. The expression of DAMP proteins HSP70 and cancer-testis antigen SPAG9 in peripheral blood of patients with HCC and lung cancer. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2017;22:237–244. doi: 10.1007/s12192-016-0758-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dutta SK, et al. Serum HSP70: a novel biomarker for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2012;41:530–534. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182374ace. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zimmermann M, et al. Discrimination of clinical stages in non-small cell lung cancer patients by serum HSP27 and HSP70: a multi-institutional case–control study. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2012;413:1115–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen JS, et al. Secreted heat shock protein 90alpha induces colorectal cancer cell invasion through CD91/LRP-1 and NF-kappaB-mediated integrin alphaV expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:25458–25466. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.139345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Peterson CL, Laniel M-A. Histones and histone modifications. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:R546–R551. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen R, Kang R, Fan XG, Tang D. Release and activity of histone in diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1370–e1370. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Patwa TH, et al. The identification of phosphoglycerate kinase-1 and histone H4 autoantibodies in pancreatic cancer patient serum using a natural protein microarray. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:2215–2226. doi: 10.1002/elps.200800857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Allam R, Kumar SVR, Darisipudi MN, Anders H-J. Extracellular histones in tissue injury and inflammation. J. Mol. Med. 2014;92:465–472. doi: 10.1007/s00109-014-1148-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kawai C, et al. Circulating extracellular histones are clinically relevant mediators of multiple organ injury. Am. J. Pathol. 2016;186:829–843. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thålin C, et al. Citrullinated histone H3 as a novel prognostic blood marker in patients with advanced cancer. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee Y, et al. PAUF functions in the metastasis of human pancreatic cancer cells and upregulates CXCR4 expression. Oncogene. 2010;29:56–67. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim SA, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma up-regulated factor (PAUF), a novel up-regulated secretory protein in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:828–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01106.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Garcia-Jove Navarro M, et al. Api5 contributes to E2F1 control of the G1/S cell cycle phase transition. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Morris EJ, et al. Functional identification of Api5 as a suppressor of E2F-dependent apoptosis in vivo. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kim YS, et al. A novel function of API5 (apoptosis inhibitor 5), TLR4-dependent activation of antigen presenting cells. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1472187–e1472187. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1472187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cho H, et al. Apoptosis inhibitor-5 overexpression is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:545. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Basset C, et al. Api5 a new cofactor of estrogen receptor alpha involved in breast cancer outcome. Oncotarget. 2017;8:52511–52526. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lindström MS. Emerging functions of ribosomal proteins in gene-specific transcription and translation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;379:167–170. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Graifer D, Malygin A, Zharkov DO, Karpova G. Eukaryotic ribosomal protein S3: A constituent of translational machinery and an extraribosomal player in various cellular processes. Biochimie. 2014;99:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mitterer V, et al. Sequential domain assembly of ribosomal protein S3 drives 40S subunit maturation. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10336. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jang C-Y, Lee JY, Kim J. RpS3, a DNA repair endonuclease and ribosomal protein, is involved in apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 2004;560:81–85. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kim Y, Kim HD, Kim J. Cytoplasmic ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3) plays a pivotal role in mitochondrial DNA damage surveillance. Biochimica et. Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res. 2013;1833:2943–2952. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim J, et al. Implication of mammalian ribosomal protein S3 in the processing of DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:13620–13629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.23.13620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kim Y, Lee MS, Kim HD, Kim J. Ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3) secreted from various cancer cells is N-linked glycosylated. Oncotarget. 2016;7:80350–80362. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Park HJ, et al. A novel TLR4 binding protein, 40S ribosomal protein S3, has potential utility as an adjuvant in a dendritic cell-based vaccine. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2019;7:60–60. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0539-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Piccinini AM, Midwood KS. DAMPening inflammation by modulating TLR signalling. Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:672395. doi: 10.1155/2010/672395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gong T, Liu L, Jiang W, Zhou R. DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:95–112. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0215-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Feldman N, Rotter-Maskowitz A, Okun E. DAMPs as mediators of sterile inflammation in aging-related pathologies. Ageing Res. Rev. 2015;24:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Patel S. Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs): the derivatives and triggers of inflammation. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18:63. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0817-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Franklin TC, Xu C, Duman RS. Depression and sterile inflammation: essential role of danger associated molecular patterns. Brain, Behav., Immun. 2018;72:2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Botos I, Segal DavidM, Davies DavidR. The structural biology of toll-like receptors. Structure. 2011;19:447–459. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kang JY, Lee J-O. Structural biology of the toll-like receptor family. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011;80:917–941. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052909-141507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Beutler, B. & Rehli, M. in Toll-Like Receptor Family Members and Their Ligands (eds Beutler, B. & Wagner, H.) 1–21 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002).
  • 76.Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Semin. Immunol. 2007;19:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Delneste Y, Beauvillain C, Jeannin P. Innate immunity: structure and function of TLRs. Med. Sci. 2007;23:67–73. doi: 10.1051/medsci/200723167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;388:621–625. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schröder NWJ, et al. Lipoteichoic Acid (LTA) of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus activates immune cells via toll-like receptor (TLR)-2, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), and CD14, whereas TLR-4 and MD-2 are not involved. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:15587–15594. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212829200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Takeda K, Akira S. TLR signaling pathways. Semin. Immunol. 2004;16:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2003.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Erridge C. Endogenous ligands of TLR2 and TLR4: agonists or assistants? J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010;87:989–999. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1209775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wang X, Sun R, Wei H, Tian Z. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)-toll-like receptor (TLR)4-interleukin (IL)-23-IL-17A axis in drug-induced damage-associated lethal hepatitis: Interaction of γδ T cells with macrophages. Hepatology. 2013;57:373–384. doi: 10.1002/hep.25982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Curtin JF, et al. HMGB1 mediates endogenous TLR2 activation and brain tumor regression. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e10–e10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yang D, et al. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin acts as an alarmin to activate the TLR2–MyD88 signal pathway in dendritic cells and enhances Th2 immune responses. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:79–90. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhao Y, et al. Helicobacter pylori heat-shock protein 60 induces interleukin-8 via a Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway in human monocytes. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007;56:154–164. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46882-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roelofs MF, et al. Identification of small heat shock protein B8 (HSP22) as a novel TLR4 ligand and potential involvement in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 2006;176:7021. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.7021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kang TH, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor serves as adjuvant by activating dendritic cells through stimulation of TLR4. Oncotarget. 2015;6:27751–27762. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Panetta JC. A mathematical model of periodically pulsed chemotherapy: tumor recurrence and metastasis in a competitive environment. Bull. Math. Biol. 1996;58:425–447. doi: 10.1007/BF02460591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Geara FB, et al. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of distant metastasis and survival. Radiother. Oncol. 1997;43:53–61. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)01914-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Huang B, Zhao J, Unkeless JC, Feng ZH, Xiong H. TLR signaling by tumor and immune cells: a double-edged sword. Oncogene. 2008;27:218–224. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kelly MG, et al. TLR-4 signaling promotes tumor growth and paclitaxel chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3859. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Korneev KV, et al. TLR-signaling and proinflammatory cytokines as drivers of tumorigenesis. Cytokine. 2017;89:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Volk-Draper L, et al. Paclitaxel therapy promotes breast cancer metastasis in a TLR4-dependent manner. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5421–5434. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cammarota R, et al. The tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer: stromal TLR-4 expression as a potential prognostic marker. J. Transl. Med. 2010;8:112. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yu L, Chen S. Toll-like receptors expressed in tumor cells: targets for therapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008;57:1271–1278. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0459-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shcheblyakov DV, et al. Toll-like receptors (TLRs): the role in tumor progression. Acta Nat. 2010;2:21–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zeromski J, Mozer-Lisewska I, Kaczmarek M. Significance of toll-like receptors expression in tumor growth and spreading: a short review. Cancer Microenviron. 2008;1:37–42. doi: 10.1007/s12307-008-0005-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dajon M, Iribarren K, Cremer I. Toll-like receptor stimulation in cancer: a pro- and anti-tumor double-edged sword. Immunobiology. 2017;222:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Netea MG, Van der Meer JWM, Kullberg B-J. Toll-like receptors as an escape mechanism from the host defense. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:484–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Urban-Wojciuk, Z. et al. The role of TLRs in anti-cancer immunity and tumor rejection. Front. Immunol.10, 2388 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 101.Chen R, Alvero AB, Silasi D-A, Mor G. Inflammation, cancer and chemoresistance: taking advantage of the toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2007;57:93–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2006.00441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Dan HC, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase/AKT and survivin pathways as critical targets for geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 2004;23:706–715. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Jego G, Bataille R, Geffroy-Luseau A, Descamps G, Pellat-Deceunynck C. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns are growth and survival factors for human myeloma cells through Toll-like receptors. Leukemia. 2006;20:1130–1137. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.He W, et al. TLR4 signaling promotes immune escape of human lung cancer cells by inducing immunosuppressive cytokines and apoptosis resistance. Mol. Immunol. 2007;44:2850–2859. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Merrell MA, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 agonists promote cellular invasion by increasing matrix metalloproteinase activity. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006;4:437. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kim EY, Moudgil KD. Regulation of autoimmune inflammation by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Immunol. Lett. 2008;120:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Foell D, Wittkowski H, Roth J. Mechanisms of disease: a ‘DAMP’ view of inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 2007;3:382–390. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD, Smyth MJ. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:235–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Medzhitov R, Janeway C. Innate immunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:338–344. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008033430506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Bonilla FA, Oettgen HC. Adaptive immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125:S33–S40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Nishikawa H, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in tumor immunity. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;127:759–767. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, Sica A. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:549–555. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Finke J, et al. MDSC as a mechanism of tumor escape from sunitinib mediated anti-angiogenic therapy. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:856–861. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sanjabi S, Zenewicz LA, Kamanaka M, Flavell RA. Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory roles of TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-22 in immunity and autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009;9:447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Salazar-Onfray F, López MN, Mendoza-Naranjo A. Paradoxical effects of cytokines in tumor immune surveillance and tumor immune escape. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2007;18:171–182. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Song J, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma up-regulated factor (PAUF) enhances the accumulation and functional activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:51840–51853. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Parker KH, et al. HMGB1 enhances immune suppression by facilitating the differentiation and suppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5723–5733. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Liu Z, Falo LD, Jr., You Z. Knockdown of HMGB1 in tumor cells attenuates their ability to induce regulatory T cells and uncovers naturally acquired CD8 T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 2011;187:118–125. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.He Y, et al. Tissue damage-associated “danger signals” influence T-cell responses that promote the progression of preneoplasia to cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:629–639. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Schlueter C, et al. Angiogenetic signaling through hypoxia: HMGB1: an angiogenetic switch molecule. Am. J. Pathol. 2005;166:1259–1263. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62344-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Jube S, et al. Cancer cell secretion of the DAMP protein HMGB1 supports progression in malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3290–3301. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pusterla T, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is a key regulator of oval cell activation and inflammation-associated liver carcinogenesis in mice. Hepatology. 2013;58:363–373. doi: 10.1002/hep.26395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Huebener P, et al. The HMGB1/RAGE axis triggers neutrophil-mediated injury amplification following necrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:539–550. doi: 10.1172/JCI76887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dumitriu IE, et al. Release of high mobility group box 1 by dendritic cells controls T cell activation via the receptor for advanced glycation end products. J. Immunol. 2005;174:7506–7515. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Luo Y, et al. High mobility group box 1 released from necrotic cells enhances regrowth and metastasis of cancer cells that have survived chemotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer. 2013;49:741–751. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kang R, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) sustains autophagy and limits apoptosis, promoting pancreatic tumor cell survival. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:666–676. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhou J, et al. HMGB1 induction of clusterin creates a chemoresistant niche in human prostate tumor cells. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15085. doi: 10.1038/srep15085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Apetoh L, et al. The interaction between HMGB1 and TLR4 dictates the outcome of anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 2007;220:47–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Liu Y, et al. Hypoxia induced HMGB1 and mitochondrial DNA interactions mediate tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma through Toll-like receptor 9. J. Hepatol. 2015;63:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Chiba S, et al. Tumor-infiltrating DCs suppress nucleic acid-mediated innate immune responses through interactions between the receptor TIM-3 and the alarmin HMGB1. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:832–842. doi: 10.1038/ni.2376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hernandez C, Huebener P, Schwabe RF. Damage-associated molecular patterns in cancer: a double-edged sword. Oncogene. 2016;35:5931–5941. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ghavami S, et al. S100A8/A9 at low concentration promotes tumor cell growth via RAGE ligation and MAP kinase-dependent pathway. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008;83:1484–1492. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0607397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ichikawa M, Williams R, Wang L, Vogl T, Srikrishna G. S100A8/A9 activate key genes and pathways in colon tumor progression. Mol. Cancer Res. 2011;9:133–148. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Gebhardt C, et al. RAGE signaling sustains inflammation and promotes tumor development. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:275–285. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Bettum IJ, et al. Metastasis-associated protein S100A4 induces a network of inflammatory cytokines that activate stromal cells to acquire pro-tumorigenic properties. Cancer Lett. 2014;344:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Sack U, et al. Novel effect of antihelminthic Niclosamide on S100A4-mediated metastatic progression in colon cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1018–1036. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Taha EA, Ono K, Eguchi T. Roles of extracellular HSPs as biomarkers in immune surveillance and immune evasion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:4588. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Gu T, et al. Impact of elevated circulating histones on systemic inflammation after radiofrequency ablation in lung cancer patients. BioMed. Res. Int. 2017;2017:6894832. doi: 10.1155/2017/6894832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kabelitz D. Expression and function of Toll-like receptors in T lymphocytes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007;19:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Rahman AH, Taylor DK, Turka LA. The contribution of direct TLR signaling to T cell responses. Immunol. Res. 2009;45:25–36. doi: 10.1007/s12026-009-8113-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.van Maren, W. W. C., Jacobs, J. F. M., de Vries, I. J. M., Nierkens, S. & Adema, G. J. Toll-like receptor signalling on Tregs: to suppress or not tosuppress? Immunology124, 445–452 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 142.Applequist SE, Wallin RPA, Ljunggren HG. Variable expression of Toll‐like receptor in murine innate and adaptive immune cell lines. Int. Immunol. 2002;14:1065–1074. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxf069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Kadowaki N, et al. Subsets of human dendritic cell precursors express different toll-like receptors and respond to different microbial antigens. J. Exp. Med. 2001;194:863–869. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.6.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Schreibelt G, et al. Toll-like receptor expression and function in human dendritic cell subsets: implications for dendritic cell-based anti-cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol., Immunother. 2010;59:1573–1582. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0833-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Billack B. Macrophage activation: role of toll-like receptors, nitric oxide, and nuclear factor kappa B. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2006;70:102–102. doi: 10.5688/aj7005102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Gallego C, Golenbock D, Gomez MA, Saravia NG. Toll-like receptors participate in macrophage activation and intracellular control of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis. Infect. Immun. 2011;79:2871–2879. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01388-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Schmitz F, Mages J, Heit A, Lang R, Wagner H. Transcriptional activation induced in macrophages by Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands: from expression profiling to a model of TLR signaling. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004;34:2863–2873. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Prince LR, Whyte MK, Sabroe I, Parker LC. The role of TLRs in neutrophil activation. Curr. Opin. Pharm. 2011;11:397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2011.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Hua Z, Hou B. TLR signaling in B-cell development and activation. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2013;10:103–106. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2012.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Muccioli M, Benencia F. Toll-like receptors in ovarian cancer as targets for immunotherapies. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:341. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Zhou M, et al. Toll-like receptor expression in normal ovary and ovarian tumors. Cancer Immunol., Immunother. 2009;58:1375–1385. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0650-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Husseinzadeh N, Davenport SM. Role of Toll-like receptors in cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers: a review. Gynecologic Oncol. 2014;135:359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kim WY, et al. Increased expression of Toll-like receptor 5 during progression of cervical neoplasia. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2008;18:300–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Nishimura M, Naito S. Tissue-specific mRNA expression profiles of human toll-like receptors and related genes. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005;28:886–892. doi: 10.1248/bpb.28.886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hasimu A, Ge L, Li Q-Z, Zhang R-P, Guo X. Expressions of Toll-like receptors 3, 4, 7, and 9 in cervical lesions and their correlation with HPV16 infection in Uighur women. Chin. J. Cancer. 2011;30:344–350. doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Ren T, et al. Functional expression of TLR9 is associated to the metastatic potential of human lung cancer cell: functional active role of TLR9 on tumor metastasis. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007;6:1704–1709. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.11.4826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Droemann D, et al. Human lung cancer cells express functionally active Toll-like receptor 9. Respir. Res. 2005;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Fukata M, et al. Toll-like receptor-4 promotes the development of colitis-associated colorectal tumors. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1869–1881. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Fukata M, Abreu MT. TLR4 signalling in the intestine in health and disease. Biochemical Soc. Trans. 2007;35:1473–1478. doi: 10.1042/BST0351473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Pedersen G, Andresen L, Matthiessen MW, Rask-Madsen J, Brynskov J. Expression of Toll-like receptor 9 and response to bacterial CpG oligodeoxynucleotides in human intestinal epithelium. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2005;141:298–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02848.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Damiano V, et al. Novel toll-like receptor 9 agonist induces epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition and synergistic antitumor activity with EGFR inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:577–583. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Rhee SH, Im E, Pothoulakis C. Toll-like receptor 5 engagement modulates tumor development and growth in a mouse xenograft model of human colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:518–528. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Goto Y, et al. Activation of Toll-like receptors 2, 3, and 4 on human melanoma cells induces inflammatory factors. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008;7:3642–3653. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Salaun B, Lebecque S, Matikainen S, Rimoldi D, Romero P. Toll-like receptor 3 expressed by melanoma cells as a target for therapy? Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4565–4574. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Xie W, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 mediates invasion via activating NF-kappaB in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;379:1027–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Curtin JF, et al. HMGB1 mediates endogenous TLR2 activation and brain tumor regression. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Hassan F, et al. Intracellular expression of toll-like receptor 4 in neuroblastoma cells and their unresponsiveness to lipopolysaccharide. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Ilvesaro JM, et al. Toll like receptor-9 agonists stimulate prostate cancer invasion in vitro. Prostate. 2007;67:774–781. doi: 10.1002/pros.20562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Kundu SD, et al. The toll-like receptor pathway: a novel mechanism of infection-induced carcinogenesis of prostate epithelial cells. Prostate. 2008;68:223–229. doi: 10.1002/pros.20710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Schmaußer B, Andrulis M, Endrich S, Müller-Hermelink H-K, Eck M. Toll-like receptors TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9 on gastric carcinoma cells: An implication for interaction with Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005;295:179–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Chochi K, et al. Helicobacter pylori augments growth of gastric cancers via the lipopolysaccharide-toll-like receptor 4 pathway whereas its lipopolysaccharide attenuates antitumor activities of human mononuclear cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:2909. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Chang YJ, Wu MS, Lin JT, Chen CC. Helicobacter pylori-Induced invasion and angiogenesis of gastric cells is mediated by cyclooxygenase-2 induction through TLR2/TLR9 and promoter regulation. J. Immunol. 2005;175:8242–8252. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental & Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES