Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2018 Mar 26;80(5):2275–2287. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27182

EPR-based oximetric imaging: a combination of single point-based spatial encoding and T1 weighting

Ken-ichiro Matsumoto 1,2, Shun Kishimoto 3, Nallathamby Devasahayam 3, Gadisetti V R Chandramouli 4, Yukihiro Ogawa 1,2, Shingo Matsumoto 5, Murali C Krishna 3, Sankaran Subramanian 6
PMCID: PMC8080971  NIHMSID: NIHMS1681857  PMID: 29582458

Abstract

Purpose:

Spin-lattice relaxation rate (R1)-based time-domain EPR oximetry is reported for in vivo applications using a paramagnetic probe, a trityl-based Oxo71.

Methods:

The R1 dependence of the trityl probe Oxo71 on partial oxygen pressure (pO2) was assessed using single-point imaging mode of spatial encoding combined with rapid repetition, similar to T1-weighted MRI, for which R1 was determined from 22 repetition times ranging from 2.1 to 40.0 μs at 300 MHz. The pO2 maps of a phantom with 3 tubes containing 2 mM Oxo71 solutions equilibrated at 0%, 2%, and 5% oxygen were determined by R1 and apparent spin–spin relaxation rate (R2*) simultaneously.

Results:

The pO2 maps derived from R1 and R2* agreed with the known pO2 levels in the tubes of Oxo71. However, the histograms of pO2 revealed that R1 offers better pO2 resolution than R2* in low pO2 regions. The SDs of pixels at 2% pO2 (15.2 mmHg) were about 5 times lower in R1-based estimation than R2*-based estimation (mean±SD: 13.9±1.77 mmHg and 18.3±8.70 mmHg, respectively). The in vivo pO2 map obtained from R1-based assessment displayed a homogeneous profile in low pO2 regions in tumor xenografts, consistent with previous reports on R2*-based oximetric imaging. The scan time to obtain the R1 map can be significantly reduced using 3 repetition times ranging from 4.0 to 12.0 μs.

Conclusion:

Using the single-point imaging modality, R1-based oximetry imaging with useful spatial and oxygen resolutions for small animals was demonstrated.

Keywords: EPR imaging, EPR oximetry, in vivo oximetry, partial oxygen pressure, single-point imaging, spin-lattice relaxation time, triphenylmethyl radical, tissue oxygen

1 |. INTRODUCTION

The importance of EPR imaging (EPRI) stems from the fact that it can be used to quantitatively determine tissue oxygenation because both the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1 = 1/R1) and spin-spin relaxation time (T2 = 1/R2) of paramagnetic electrons are shortened in the presence of oxygen. EPRI can be performed in vivo either in the continuous wave mode or in the time domain using pulsed Fourier transform techniques with exogenous paramagnetic probes.14 The observed EPR spectral line widths of many paramagnetic systems, such as lithium phthalocyanine5,6 and triphenylmethyl (trityl) radicals,79 linearly depend on the partial oxygen pressure (pO2). In fact, the time domain approach to EPR imaging became feasible for in vivo applications after the availability of narrow-line spin probes based on the trityl radical.79

Recently developed trityl derivatives8,9 with T1 and T2 of several microseconds are nontoxic at the concentrations required for imaging and have pharmacologic half-lives suffi-cient for 3D imaging. Using excitation pulses ~50 nanosec-onds and low Q resonators, in vivo EPR images were generated using a strategy known as single-point imaging (SPI), involving pure phase encoding in the presence of static gradients and subsequent Fourier transformation.1020 In order to perform EPR oximetry, the apparent spin–spin relaxation time (T*-), T2-, or T1-weighted maps can be obtained as in MRI to generate oxygen-dependent quantitative contrast in the images.10,2123 The MRI approaches require no exogenous contrast agent but provide indications of oxygenation,2123 whereas quantitative oximetry is accomplished by EPRI.

EPR oximetry based on measuring the spectral line width (LW), for which LW= R2e and γe is the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron, needs correction for self-broadening of the probe due to its own spin–spin interactions, which manifest at concentrations greater than 5 mM.18,24 This self-broadening of the probe cannot be easily deconvolved from the oxygen-dependent broadening in vivo because it requires quantitative estimation of the spin probe’s accumulation in specific tissues, for example, in kidneys and tumors. Halpern et al. reported R1-based EPR oximetry by an inversion recovery electron spin echo sequence and discovered negligible dependence of self-broadening of the spin probe Oxo63 on its concentration,24 providing a means to map in vivo pO2 at greater accuracy for the first time. An analogous technique in MRI using 19F-labeled tracers has been developed and validated in studying tumor oxygenation.2528 In this study, we present another strategy for R1-based EPR oximetry that combines the high-resolution capability of SPI by a single pulse sequence18 and the effect of interpulse delays and R1 on the steady state magnetization for rapid signal averaging.2934 This approach is applicable to a wide range of R1 values, is independent of differences in the concentration of the contrast agent as originally demonstrated by Epel and Halpern, and has a lower specific absorption rate (SAR).34 Oxo71, a deuterated Oxo63 probe, was assessed for: 1) the linear relationship between R1 and pO2, 2) R1 mapping of a phantom by EPR imaging, and 3) in vivo oximetry of a mouse tumor based on a R1 map.

2 |. THEORY

Methods for R1 mapping, such as inversion recovery,35 saturation recovery,36 and variable nutation angle,37 are unsuitable for EPR in vivo studies due to high SARs and long scan times. Approaches to the estimation of R1 by the steady-state free precession sequences at short repetition times, and their relative merits and shortcomings, are well documented in the NMR literature.29,30,32 R1-dependent magnetization recovery, that is, T1-weighted signal intensity, is defined as a function of the TR to estimate R1 by these sequences.

The saturation by fast repetition (SFR) sequence34 for R1-weighted in vivo imaging offers a high scan speed at low SAR. The SFR sequence consists of a train of phase-coherent RF pulses of a specific flip angle. In this scheme, when TR is small (TR<3T2), the signal behavior becomes complex due to the refocusing of the residual transverse magnetization Mxy from one pulse by its succeeding pulses, resulting in spin and stimulated echoes.32,33 MRI sequences such as steady-state free precession and gradient recalled echo use this scheme, interleaved with spoiler gradient pulses to destroy the residual transverse magnetization before the next pulse is applied. Such spoiler gradient sequences are not practical for EPRI due to the microsecond time scales required for the gradient settling times, which are in the same time range as the FIDs. In this study, we examined the signal intensities using an SFR sequence of π/2 pulses by varying TR values from 2.1 to 40 μs. The time-domain signal intensity S(tp) at a delay time tp from the π/2 pulse is approximated to:

S(tp)=M0[1exp(R1TR)]exp(tpR2*), (1)

for which M0 is equilibrium magnetization. In SPI, image reconstruction is done by monitoring the phase of a single point in the FID at a chosen delay time (tp) following the excitation pulse. The image pixel intensities reflect both R1 and R2* effects. Hence, it is possible to obtain pO2 maps based on both R1 and R2* effects from the same data set.

3 |. METHODS

3.1 |. Chemicals

The trityl probe Oxo71, which is the deuterated form of Oxo63 at the methylene moieties indicated by asterisks in Figure 1A, was obtained from GE Health Care (Milwaukee, WI). Gas tanks of argon, air, and mixtures of 2% (±0.1%), 5% (±0.1%), 10% (±0.1%) oxygen with nitrogen were procured from local suppliers (Roberts Oxygen, Rockville, MD). Argon and medical air were used for 0% oxygen and 21% oxygen, respectively. The pressure of 21% O2 after equilibration is 760 mmHg×0.21=160 mmHg, which is approximately 0.25mM O2 at 25 °C.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) The structure of triarylmethyl probe Oxo71. The asterisks indicate deuterated methylene moieties. (B) Schematic (left) and cross-section (right) of the 3-tube phantom showing the tubes filled with spin probe solution as filled circles

3.2 |. Animals

Female C3H Hen MTV mice, supplied by the Frederick Cancer Research Center’s Animal Production unit (Frederick, MD), were housed in a climate-controlled and circadian rhythm-adjusted room and allowed food and water ad libitum. Squamous cell carcinoma SCCVII cells were implanted (0.2–0.3 million cells/mouse were injected subcutaneously as 106 cells suspension) in the right thigh. Approximate tumor size during experimentation was about 10 mm. Experiments were conducted in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animal Resources (National Research Council, 1996) and were approved by the National Cancer Institute’s Animal Care and Use Committee.

3.3 |. Acquisition of calibration data

The spectral and imaging data were scanned on a home-built time-domain EPR imager described previously (NIH, Bethesda, MD)38 and operating at 300 MHz. The power amplifier used in this study (BT0250-EF-RBB, Tomco Technologies, Norwood SA 5067, Australia) had a rise time and fall time of<20 ns, with a duty cycle of 5%. This allowed a repetition time TR of ~ 2 microseconds using pulse widths of 110 nanoseconds for a π/2 pulse. The pO2 calibration experiments were performed using aqueous solutions of 2mM Oxo71 equilibrated at 5 oxygen levels (0%, 2%, 5%, 10%, and 21%) and 1, 5, and 10mM Oxo71 solutions equilibrated at 0% oxygen in separate glass tubes. Oxygen levels were achieved by bubbling the appropriate gas into the sample for about 45 min and were maintained by sealing with epoxy. Time-domain EPR signals were recorded by a series of π/2 pulses, separated by TR ranging from 2.1 to 40 μs at ambient temperature.

3.4 |. Phantom 2D imaging

Three tubes containing 2mM Oxo71 solution equilibrated at 0%, 2%, and 5% oxygen were mounted parallel to the magnetic field y axis in an equilateral triangular geometry in a plastic holder placed in a resonator of 25-mm diameter (Figure 1B). The phantom 2D data were acquired in the xz-plane (cross-section of the tubes) at ambient temperature using a 31×31 Cartesian grid; Gmax =10 mT/m; 5,000 signal averages; a sampling dwell time of 5 ns; a flip angle of 90°; TR=3 to 40 μs; and dead time of 0.25 μs. Calculations and image reconstruction were done by MatLab (MathWorks, Natick, MA) scripts developed in-house.

3.5 |. In vivo imaging

A mouse was anesthetized by 2% isoflurane in medical air, mounted prone on a custom-designed holder, and maintained at a breathing rate of 60 per min and a core body temperature of 37±1 °C by a flow of warm air. The mouse body temperature was monitored by a nonmagnetic probe (FISO technologies, Quebec, Canada) inserted into the rectum. The urethra was cannulated using size 10 polyethylene tubing. The urine was drained during the experiment. A 30-G needle extended using size 10 polyethylene tubing was cannulated into the tail vein. The mouse thigh having the squamous cell carcinoma tumor was positioned in a 19-mm diameter resonator. Oxo71 solution at 75mM concentration was administered through tail vein cannulation by giving an initial bolus of 1.125 μmol/g body weight and continuous administration of 0.06 μmol/g/min subsequently to maintain a steady signal level. Images were acquired in the yz-plane, which corresponds to the sagittal plane on the mouse leg, at 21×21 phase encodings in the Cartesian grid by varying the TR from 2.3 to 40 μs.

3.6 |. Scan times

The data acquisition time for a single scan=TR×Nav×(Nk+1)+dT, for which Nav is the number of averages, Nk is number of all phase encodings, and dT is about 1 s—the sum of instrument delays before acquisition after changing the configuration or gradient. Background signals were acquired under identical conditions before the data acquisition. For phantom imaging, Nav=5,000 and Nk=312; and scan times at TR=3.4, 8, 12, and 40 μs were 18, 40, 59 and 194 s, respectively. Approximate R2* may be assessed by a single scan at a specific TR, whereas 3 scans at different gradient maxima are necessary to minimize edge artifacts. The scan time for R2* mapping at TR=40 μs was 194 s and at TR=12 μs was 59 s. The scan time for 3 gradient scans performed at TR=8 μs was 120 s. The scan time for the estimation of R1 from 22 TR values was 24 min, and from 3 TR values at 5, 8, and 12 μs was 125 s. For mice, Nk=212; and single scan times at TR=3.4, 8, 12, and 40 μs were 9, 19, 28, and 90 s, respectively. The R1 estimation from 23 TR values was 11 min.

4 |. RESULTS

4.1 |. Calibration parameters

The relationships 1) LW versus pO2, for which LW (μT)=R2*/(28025π);2) LW versus [Oxo71]; and 3) pO2 versus longitudinal relaxation rate R1 were calculated from Oxo71 calibration spectral data. The apparent transverse relaxation rate R2* was considered as the asymptotic R2* value at a long TR (Figure 2A) to avoid echo contributions observed at short TR (Figure 2B). The linear fit of R2*-based LW to pO2 in the range of 0% to 21% (Figure 2C) indicated the following relationship:

LW(μT)=0.1257pO2(mmHg)+8.786. (2)

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Dependence of R1 on pO2 for Oxo71. (A) Phantom imaging FID signals acquired at TR=12 μs. (B) Steady-state free precession FID profiles observed in phantom imaging at TR=2.1 μs. Note the beginning of echoes at the short TR. The echo is truncated by the TR. (C) Linear dependence of line width calculated from R2* on pO2. (D) The spectral peak heights normalized to M0=1 as a function of TR in the range 2.1 to 40 μs at 0%, 2%, 5%, and 10% pO2 of a 2mM Oxo71 solution. Observed data are shown by the symbol×, and continuous lines indicate the fit to Equation 5. Note the larger deviations at low TR values. (E) The deviations are reduced at low TR if the echo contributions are included in the fit. (F) Linear dependence of pO2 on R1. Standard errors of R1 and R2 are in the range of 0.0021 to 0.0165. LW, line width; PO2, partial oxygen pressure.

Equation 2 was used directly to calculate a pO2 map of the phantom from the LW. However, in vivo studies require correction for the self-broadening of [Oxo71]. The linear fit of LW to [Oxo71] in the range of 1 to 10mM at 0% pO2 indicated that:

LW(μT)=0.5745[Oxo71](mM)+6.733. (3)

Therefore, the following equation was used for pO2 estimations from LW in vivo.

LW(μT)=0.1257pO2(mmHg)+0.5745[Oxo71](mM)+7.637. (4)

Next, the R1 value at each pO2 was calculated by fitting the observed spectral peak height Sp as a function of TR (Figure 2D) according to Equation 5 below:

Sp=M0[1exp(R1TR)]. (5)

Sp depends on the FID profile covered. The peak heights of the observed spectra (Spobs) were obtained by fast Fourier transform of the FID within a constant tp range beginning right after the dead time and ending just before the intensity rise due to echo. The calculated peak heights (Spcalc) were obtained by fast Fourier transform of simulated time-domain signals according to Equation 1 for given R1, R2*, TR values, and a scaling factor to account for M0 within the same tp range. The Nelder-Mead simplex direct-search algorithm39 was used by varying R1 and the scaling factor. The R1 values resulting in the smallest sum of squares of errors between Spobs and Spcalc were determined. The Sp values shown in Figure 2D were scaled to a maximum of ~1 for each pO2 separately because the peak heights decrease with increasing pO2 levels. This fitting indicated larger deviations at low TR values (< 3 μs) owing to echo contributions. Furthermore, the intensity variation of 21% pO2 was too small to determine R1 accurately with a 300 MHz EPRI scanner. Therefore, we explored the peak height calculation, including the spin and stimulated echo contributions according to the procedure described by Gyngell.32 The fitting improved at low TR values, as expected (Figure 2E), but the R1 value at 21% pO2 remained approximately the same as previously estimated by Equation 1. It is likely a limitation of the SFR sequence for R1 estimation that a significant fraction of the the signal is lost in dead time. The relationship between pO2 and R1 was found to be linear for pO2≤10% (Figure 2F) according to Equation 1, as follows:

pO2(mmHg)=122.22R1(MHz)20.36. (6)

The advantage of Equation 1 over the procedure described by Gyngell32 is its ability to implement the SPI method when the interference from echo signals is negligible.

4.2 |. Phantom T1-weighted imaging

2D images of the phantom were scanned by an SFR sequence in the TR range of 3.0 to 40.0 μs. At low TR values, the echoes led to ghosts at different scales and orientations, superimposed on the original image depicted in Figure 3A. This is in analogy to Nyquist N/2 ghosts in MR echo planar imaging.40 The FOV, orientation, and intensity of a ghost depend on its phase and the time passed since its originating pulse at the current delay time (Figures 3A3F). For example, at TR=3 μs and tp=1.5, 1.75, and 2.25 μs, the image of original 3-tube phantom appears 4 times, twice in normal orientation and twice in inverted orientation (Figures 3B 3D). However, only 1 of those follows the expected intensity decay and phase evolution profile after a π/2 pulse, and the others are removed by fitting. Specific delay times for which the interference distorts the image, as shown in Figure 3C, are to be avoided by suitable choice of delay times (tp). The early delay times were found to have fewer echo signals.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The effect of spin and stimulated echoes at short repetition times for a phantom containing 3 tubes. (A–C) TR=3 μs and delay times of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.25 μs, respectively. (D–F) Delay time=1.75 μs and TR values of 3, 5, and 12 μs, respectively. The crosshairs are not part of the map. Notice multiple ghost 3-tube shapes of different sizes and orientations at TR=3 μs in C and D, for which 2 overlapping images are in normal orientation and 2 more are in inverted orientation of phantom in F at lower scales. These begin to disappear at TR=5 μs and are fully absent at TR=12 μs

Initially, the R2* map was calculated from the pixel intensities of images at 5 delay times equally spaced from 1.0 to 1.4 μs because R2* is required to estimate R1 according to Equation 1. The k-space data were preprocessed prior to image reconstruction to correct for any zero shifts and weighted by a tapered cosine window to minimize ringing artifact from the tubes. All the images were reconstructed by scaling to the smallest FOV via chirp-z transformation. Any marginal FOV mismatches arising from inaccurate estimate of dead time were adjusted by recalculating the scaling factors to minimize the errors. Further reduction of ringing artifacts was accomplished by re-gridding of k-space, as previously described.17 The pixel intensities S(tp) were normalized to account for the change in FOV and the spin density (S0, pixel intensity at tp=0), and R2* maps were calculated by fitting to Equation 7, as described previously.18

S(tp)=S0exp(tpR2*). (7)

The R1 estimation, however, needs only 1 delay point at different TR values. If the intensities at a specific delay are normalized to the longest delay by which the intensities reach a constant value asymptotically, the graphs of intensity as a function of TR will coincide for all the images at different single-point time delays and decay due to R2* will be eliminated.

The intensities at the first delay time (tp=1.0 μs) as a function of TR were chosen to estimate R1 to take advantage of the higher SNR. R1 and M0 values were calculated for each pixel separately by fitting to Equation 1 because S(tp) and R2* are known. This M0 map is merely a map of scaling factors obtained from the fitting that may have a complex relationship to the equilibrium magnetization, depending on the pO2 map. The background regions containing essentially noise were masked prior to fitting to optimize the computation. The pixels at<5% of the maximum intensity were included in the mask.

The pO2 estimation from LW and R1 using Equations 6 and 2 is shown in Figure 4. The M0 and R1 maps were calculated including 22 TR values ranging from 3.4 to 40.0 μs at tp=1.0 μs, and S0 and R2* were calculated at TR=40 μs from 5 tp values equally spaced from 1.0 to 1.4 μs. In the M0 map (Figure 4A), the intensities of 0% and 5% pO2 tubes appear to be distinctly different, whereas this difference is smaller in the S0 (TR=40 μs) map (Figure 4D). The contrast between the 3 tubes appears relatively more distinct in the R1 map than in R2* (Figures 4B and 4E). The contrast-to-noise ratios calculated from 0% and 5% pO2 regions, considering the noise as RMS deviation, were 10.7 and 3.8 for R1 and R2* methods, respectively. However, the pO2 maps obtained from both R1 and R2* are in agreement (Figures 4C and 4F), despite a better SNR of the pO2 map derived from R1. The calculation of the M0 and R1 maps was repeated, including only 3 TR values—5, 8, and 12 μs (Figure 5)—in order to check the feasibility of increasing the scan speed. These images are in good agreement with those calculated from 22 TR values (difference of means=0.65 mmHg and 1.96 SD=5.7 mmHg) (Supporting Information Figure S3), indicating the possibility of fast R1 scans using 3 low TR values approximately in the range of 5 to 12 μs.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Phantom images calculated using data acquired at 22 TR values (3.4, 3.8, 4.2, 4.6, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 μs). Scan time=23 min. (A–C) M0, R1, and pO2 maps, respectively. (D–F) S0, R2*, and pO2 maps calculated from 5 delay times from 1.0 to 1.4 μs at TR=40 μs. Scan time=3.2 m.M0, equilibrium magnetization.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Phantom images calculated from signal intensities at 3 TR values (5, 8, and 12 μs). Scan time=2 min. (A–C) M0, R1, and pO2 maps, respectively. (D–F) S0, R2*, and pO2 maps calculated from 5 delay times from 1.0 to 1.4 μs at TR=12 μs. Scan time=1 min

The pixel histograms of 0%, 2%, and 5% oxygenated Oxo71 solutions (Figure 6) indicate better resolution of pO2 in the maps derived from R1 than from R2*. The pO2 values calculated from the R1 map are more uniform whether 3 or 22 repetition times were used (Figures 6A and 6B). pO2 values of pixels (mean±SD) in the regions of 0%, 2%, and 5% pO2 tubes were 0.68±0.20, 1.83±0.23, and 4.95±0.5%, respectively. In contrast, the R2* map gave broader ranges of pO2 values in all 3 regions, leading to higher overlap of histograms (Figures 6C and 6D). The mean±SD of pO2 values for pixels in the regions of 0%, 2%, and 5% pO2 were 1.58±1.02, 2.41±1.14, and 4.72±0.54%, respectively. The phantom study suggests that oximetry by R1 yields not only more reliable pO2 estimates but also better pO2 resolution than the R2* method, despite the linearity of R2* with pO2 over a wider range.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Histograms of pO2 maps in the regions of tubes at pO2=0%, 2%, and 5%. (A) Calculated using R1 derived from 22 TR values. (B) Calculated using R1 derived from 3 TR values. (C) Calculated using R2* derived from 5 points at TR=40 μs. (D) Calculated using R2* derived from 5 points at TR=12 μs

4.3 |. In vivo imaging of mouse tumor

The mouse 2D projection image data were acquired by phase encoding in 21×21 Cartesian grid, and the images were reconstructed at a 256×256 matrix size. A steady infusion of Oxo71 was maintained to provide an adequate signal throughout the data acquisition. The R2* and S0 maps were calculated using 5 equally spaced delay times from 0.85 to 1.25 μs for 23 TR values ranging from 2.3 to 40 μs. Initially the M0, R1, and pO2 maps were calculated at tp=0.85 μs from these data, without correction for the variations in the infused Oxo71 probe. Comparison of the pixel intensity versus TR profiles of the phantom with those of the mice revealed differences. In the case of the phantom experiment, smooth profiles asymptotically reached a maximum, as expected (Supporting Information Figure S1A). In the case of the mouse experiment, the profiles were noisy, and the pixel intensity continued to increase up to the longest TR due to continuous infusion of the spin probe (Supporting Information Figure S1B). The intensity change due to the infused probe appeared to be linearly correlated with TR because the scan time is directly proportional to the local amount of probe in this case. The rate of increase in the signal due to probe infusion was estimated from TR=16 to 40 μs, for which the signal is expected to reach an asymptotic maximum level (99.8% for T1=2.5 μs). Each profile was corrected for this variation, and M0, R1, and pO2 maps were recalculated (Figure 7). Despite the correction, no appreciable improvement was observed in the R1 maps, indicating the robustness of this method for a large number of TR values. A calculation using only 3 TR values (4.2, 6, and 12 μs) without applying this correction produced almost identical M0 maps (Figures 7A and 7D), but the R1 map differed in some regions (Figures 7B and 7E). However, the pO2 maps obtained from R1 measurement were homogeneous.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

In vivo R1-based mapping of a mouse bearing a squamous cell carcinoma tumor. (A–C) M0, R1, and pO2 maps calculated from signal intensities measured at 23 TR values (2.3, 3.2, 3.4, 3.8, 4.2, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 μs). Scan time=10.8 min. (D–F) M0, R1, and pO2 maps calculated using 3 TR values (4.2, 6, and 12 μs). Scan time=52 s. The background is masked in all maps. A region of interest covering high M0 is indicated by the dashed contour line in all the maps to allow comparisons

5 |. DISCUSSION

This study provides an approach to calculate pO2 from both R1 and R2* methods for the deuterated trityl probe Oxo71, which has a longer T2* than Oxo63. The calibration graph shown in Figure 2F indicates a linear relationship between pO2 and R1 for pO2≤10%. Because the linearity below 10% pO2 is adequate for in vivo studies, extension to higher pO2 levels is not addressed in this study.

Equilibration of 10% oxygen in water yields approximately 0.12mM oxygen dissolved at 25 °C. In vivo pO2 in muscle tissues are reported to be around 40 mmHg,41 corresponding to 0.05mM oxygen at 37 °C. Most tissues have lower pO2 than muscle, except for lung and arterial blood. Therefore, the linear range of pO2 versus R1 in this phantom study is adequate for most in vivo studies measuring pathophysiological tissue pO2. The data for SPI-based R1 estimation inherently contain data for R2*-based pO2 mapping, which can estimate higher pO2 ranges if desired.

Phantom imaging experiments suggest that the pixel intensities follow Equation 5 for a wide range of TR values fairly well at a constant delay time (tp) (Supporting Information Figure S1A). Three TR values defining the intensity curve were found to be sufficient to produce a reliable pO2 map in vitro, for which probe concentrations remain constant with time. Interestingly, the quality of both phantom and mouse images was unaffected by the echoes when suitable delay times and TR values were chosen. The choices of TR and tp are not critical except for avoiding the overlap of ghosts, as shown in Figure 3C, for which the FOVs and phases of the original and ghost images are almost equal (which happens in special cases of TR <5 μs for Oxo71).

The estimation of R1 in vivo by EPRI was previously reported by Epel et al. using the inversion recovery electron spin echo sequence π-T-π/2-τ-π-τ-echo.24 Subsequently a comparison of various pulse schemes to measure R1 by EPRI was reported by these authors,34 for which an inversion recovery sequence was recommended for reliable spin probe concentration-independent pO2 mapping. An SFR sequence can provide T1-weighted maps from which pO2 can be determined. Although the R1 is not as accurate as the inversion recovery electron spin echo sequence, it offers faster scan speeds and high spatial resolution at low SAR. This single-pulse experiment is widely used in MRI to estimate R1.29,30,32 We chose rectangular hard pulses at a flip angle of 90° for this study, for which transverse magnetization did not completely decay at TR<3 μs. Optimization of this method using fewer TR values will reduce the scan times to acceptable levels for in vivo imaging, similar to R2*-based SPI oximetry. The phantom studies revealed that the ratio of SDs in R2* versus R1 methods for pO2<2% is about 5, indicating the possibility of higher resolution by R1 at pO2 values below 2%. In SPI, the 1D spatial resolution Δ is given by FOV/N=2π/(γeGmaxtp), for which N is the number of phase encodings; γe is the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron; Gmax is the maximum gradient; and tp is the delay time.20 The R2* computation involves FOV scaling while the tp value is varied. The spatial resolution is 2mm for the mouse data at tp=0.85 μs (1.7mm for the phantom at tp=1 μs). However, a spatial resolution of 1.4mm (1.25mm for phantom) was realized in the pO2 maps due to extension of k-space dimensions by the regridding necessary for R2* estimation.

Experiments in this study were done with a single maximum-field-gradient configuration, although the multiple maximum-field-gradient configuration was proposed in a previous study18 to avoid the edge artifacts. The single maximum-field-gradient configuration causes alteration of SPI resolution, along with tp.17 Due to edge artifacts in R2* and S0, some artificially high values unnaturally distributed on the edge of the object can be obtained. On the other hand, the R1 and the M0 estimations, along with TR, did not give such edge artifacts because a set of SPIs obtained at the identical tp has the same resolution. The R1 map was computed at shortest tp value but at the same resolution applied to R2*. The images were reconstructed at a single tp value with the best S/N ratio, reducing the uncertainties.

The mouse and phantom images at 5 delay times (tp=0.85–1.25 μs) and 3 TR values (TR=4.2, 6, and 12 μs) are shown respectively in Figure 8 and Supporting Information Figure S2 in matrix form for better insights into the data. The M0 and R1 maps calculated at early tp (0.85 μs in Figure 9 and 1.0 μs in Supporting Information Figure S2) are shown on the right, and the S0 and R2* calculated for each column are shown in the top 2 rows. Because the FOV changes with tp but not by TR, the M0 map resembles the images at shortest tp. In contrast, the S0 map depends on the intensity variations with tp at each TR. The FID signal in some regions, for example, those having high pO2 or low intensities, decays to noise faster than in the other regions, which leads to stronger contrasts in S0 and R2* maps. Further, the relaxation of transverse magnetization varies with TR, leading to differences in the S0 and R2* maps with TR. As a result, the SDs observed in pO2 values based on R2* are inherently higher. In addition, the accuracy of pO2 estimates from R2* depend on the ability to correct for self-broadening accurately. Although this is not obvious in the phantom in which which the concentrations are uniform, it is apparent in mouse imaging when a highly concentrated bolus of the spin probe distributes inhomogeneously in the body via systemic circulation, yielding a wide range of concentrations. This suggests that the use of R1 is superior to R2* for in vivo pO2 studies. The advantage of SPI using an SFP sequence is fast data acquisition at the equivalent scan time of the multigradient approach previously reported for R2*-based oximetry.18

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Overview of R1 and R2* determination methods. Single-point images S(tp) of a mouse leg bearing a squamous cell carcinoma tumor calculated at TR=4.2, 6, and 12 μs; and tp=0.85, 0.95, 1.05, 1.15, and 1.25 μs are shown as a matrix. The images in the columns are used to calculate R2* and S0 maps. The images in the rows are used to calculate R1 and M0 maps. The images at longest TR (column at 12 μs) and shortest tp (row at 0.85 μs) provide relatively better SNR

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Left: R2* and S0 calculated from single-point image intensities S(tp) at TR=4.2, 6, and 12 μs; and tp=0.85, 0.95, 1.05, 1.15, and 1.25 μs of a mouse leg bearing a squamous cell carcinoma tumor. Bottom right: M0 and R1 calculated at tp=0.85 μs. Top right: The pO2 maps calculated from R2* at TR=12 μs and from R1 calculated at tp=0.85 μs. The relationship between R2* and pO2 is: pO2 (mmHg)=7.957 LW (μT) − 4.571 [oxo71](mM) − 60.765, for which LW(μT)=R2*/(28025π) and the relationship between R1 and pO2 is pO2 (mmHg)=122.21R1(MHz) − 20.36

It has been shown by inversion recovery methods that R1 is linearly proportional to pO2 in the range of 0% to 21% for Oxo63.24 In this work, although the range of pO2 assessed by R2* includes 0% to 21%, the R1-based method limits the pO2 range to 0% to 10% (Figure 2). This limitation arises from the availability of the FID signal after the dead time at a flip angle of π/2. Recall that the smaller flip angle limits the change in z-magnetization (Mz), and hence the accuracy of R1 assessment. The best R1 assessment is accomplished when pO2 is close to 0% and scans include both low and high TR values to define the intensity versus TR profile adequately. About 12 TR values from 4.2 to 40 μs were found to be adequate for accurate pO2 estimation by the R1 method. Calibration experiments on individual Oxo71 solutions suggest that it is possible to attain a linear relationship between pO2 and R1 for pO2<10%. The slope and intercept of Equation 6 are 122.22 and −20.35, with standard errors of±1.96, and±0.96, respectively. These values indicate that pO2 can be determined at a resolution of 0.6 mmHg at 0% and ~3 mmHg at 10%. The sensitivities of both R1 and R2* methods were compared with the pO2 levels estimated from phantom images. The R1 and R2* methods estimated 0% pO2 as 5 and 12 mmHg, respectively. At 2% and 5%, the pO2 estimations are closer to the expected values. The slope of observed versus expected pO2 in the 0% to 5% range is closer to 1 for R1 (slope=0.88) than R2* (slope=0.71), indicating that pO2 estimated by R1 is more specific and more sensitive than the estimate by R2*. R1 values estimated by 3 TR points indicated a lower slope of 0.84, pointing to a loss of sensitivity. Although SDs of histograms are expected to decrease with increasing the number of TR points, no apparent improvement was observed by increasing to 5 TR points. About 12 TR points (phantom scan time=14 min) (Supporting Information Figure S5) were found to be adequate to obtain SDs similar to those of Figure 6A. In order to perform 3D imaging in vivo, the scan time is to be reduced to under 10 minutes by constraining several parameters such as Nav=1,250; matrix size=19×19×19; partial k-space acquisition, and by excluding long TR (> 25 μs) values.

6 |. CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of mapping spin-lattice relaxation times based on SPI data collection and their use to determine spatially resolved oxygen levels in vivo. The scan time can be reduced to match conventional R2* measurements by using a combination of relatively short TR data sets and further optimization. The single pulse sequence with variable TR is an attractive approach to evaluate R1 for in vivo oximetry due its low SAR. The R1 estimation by SPI simultaneously determines R2*. The fact that the R1 method offers a more accurate pO2 estimation with very little dependence on spin probe concentration, coupled with the intrinsic line width-independent high resolution and the relatively large effective uniform excitation band width, make this a highly practical approach for small animal EPR oximetric imaging.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental figures

FIGURE S1. The pixel intensity profiles as a function of TR. A. Phantom data in the 0% pO2 region. B and C. In vivo data of a mouse tumor for the top 1000 pixels, before and after probe abundance correction, respectively.

FIGURE S2. Overview of R1 and R2* determination methods. Single point images of a three-tube phantom calculated at TR=5, 8, and 12 μs and tp=1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 μs are shown in the black box. The rows above the box are the R2* and S0 maps calculated at the corresponding TR. Right, top row: The pO2 map calculated from R2* at TR=12 μs and the pO2 map calculated from R1. Right, bottom row: M0 and R1 maps calculated at tp=1.0 μs are indicated by the red arrow.

FIGURE S3. Bland-Altman plot comparing pixel to pixel pO2 values of the phantom calculated using (a) 22 TR values and (b) 3 TR values. The ordinate is (a) – (b) and the abscissa is their mean.

FIGURE S4. Relationship between R1 determined by SFR sequence and R2* of Oxo71 for pO2 in the range of 0 – 10%.

FIGURE S5. A. Phantom pO2 map calculated using data acquired at 12 TR values (4.2, 4.6, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14, 20, 25, 30 and 35 μs). B. Histograms of pO2 in the regions of tubes at 0%, 2%, and 5%. Scan time=14 min.

Footnotes

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Epel B, Sundramoorthy SV, Barth ED, Mailer C, Halpern HJ. Comparison of 250 MHz electron spin echo and continuous wave oxygen EPR imaging methods for in vivo applications. Med Phys. 2011;38:2045–2052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Subramanian S, Matsumoto K, Mitchell JB, Krishna MC. Radio frequency continuous-wave and time-domain EPR imaging and Overhauser-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of small animals: instrumental developments and comparison of relative merits for functional imaging. NMR Biomed. 2004;17: 263–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Subramanian S, Mitchell J, Krishna M. Time-domain radio frequency EPR imaging. Biol Magn Reson. 2003;18:153–197. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Eaton G, Eaton S, Ohno K. EPR Imaging and In Vivo EPR. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press;1991. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ilangovan G, Zweier JL, Kuppusamy P. Electrochemical preparation and EPR studies of lithium phthalocyanine. Part 2: Particle-size-dependent line broadening by molecular oxygen and its implications as an oximetry probe. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104: 9404–9410. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Liu KJ, Gast P, Moussavi M, et al. Lithium phthalocyanine: a probe for electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry in viable biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:5438–5442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Reddy TJ, Iwama T, Halpern HJ, Rawal VH. General synthesis of persistent trityl radicals for EPR imaging of biological systems. J Org Chem. 2002;67:4635–4639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Yong L, Harbridge J, Quine RW, et al. Electron spin relaxation of triarylmethyl radicals in fluid solution. J Magn Reson. 2001; 152:156–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Ardenkjær-Larsen JH, Laursen I, Leunbach I, et al. EPR and DNP properties of certain novel single electron contrast agents intended for oximetric imaging. J Magn Reson. 1998;133:1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Halse M, Rioux J, Romanzetti S, et al. Centric scan SPRITE magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of SNR, resolution, and relaxation time mapping. J Magn Reson. 2004;169:102–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Beyea SD, Balcom BJ, Mastikhin IV, Bremner TW, Armstrong RL, Grattan-Bellew PE. Imaging of heterogeneous materials with a turbo spin echo single-point imaging technique. J Magn Reson. 2000;144:255–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Choi S, Tang X-W, Cory DG. Constant time imaging approaches to NMR microscopy. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 1997;8:263–276. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Balcom BJ, Macgregor RP, Beyea SD, Green DP, Armstrong RL, Bremner TW. Single-point ramped imaging with T1 enhancement (SPRITE). J Magn Reson A. 1996;123:131–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Axelson D, Kantzas A, Eads T. Single point 1H magnetic resonance imaging of rigid solids. Can J Appl Spectrosc. 1995;40: 16–26. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Gravina S, Cory D. Sensitivity and resolution of constant-time imaging. J Magn Reson Ser B. 1994;104:53–61. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Emid S, Creyghton J. High resolution NMR imaging in solids. Phys B+C. 1985;128:81–83. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Jang H, Subramanian S, Devasahayam N, et al. Single acquisition quantitative single-point electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:1173–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Matsumoto K, Subramanian S, Devasahayam N, et al. Electron paramagnetic resonance imaging of tumor hypoxia: enhanced spatial and temporal resolution for in vivo pO2 determination. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1157–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Devasahayam N, Murugesan R, Yamada K, et al. Evaluation of a high-speed signal-averager for sensitivity enhancement in radio frequency Fourier transform electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. Rev Sci Instrum. 2002;73:3920–3925. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Subramanian S, Devasahayam N, Murugesan R, et al. Single-point (constant-time) imaging in radiofrequency Fourier transform electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 48:370–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Hallac RR, Zhou H, Pidikiti R, et al. Correlations of noninvasive BOLD and TOLD MRI with pO2 and relevance to tumor radiation response. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:1863–1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Winter JD, Akens MK, Cheng H-LM. Quantitative MRI assessment of VX2 tumour oxygenation changes in response to hyperoxia and hypercapnia. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Safronova MM, Colliez F, Magat J, et al. Mapping of global R1 and R2*values versus lipids R1 values as potential markers of hypoxia in human glial tumors: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:105–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Epel B, Bowman MK, Mailer C, Halpern HJ. Absolute oxygen R1e imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:362–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Zhao D, Jiang L, Mason RP. Measuring changes in tumor oxygenation. Methods Enzymol. 2004;386:378–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Mason RP, Shukla HP, Antich PP. In vivo oxygen tension and temperature: simultaneous determination using 19F spectroscopy of perfluorocarbon. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:296–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Guo Q, Mattrey RF, Guclu C, Buxton RB, Nalcioglu O. Dynamic measurements of pO2 by T1 and T2 of 19F with PFOB. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the SMRM, Berlin, Germany. 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Thomas SR, Pratt RG, Millard RW, Samaratunga RC, Shiferaw Y, Clark LC. Evaluation of the influence of the aqueous phase bioconstituent environment on the F-19 T1 of perfluorocarbon blood substitute emulsions. Radiology. 1991;18:159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Deoni SC, Rutt BK, Peters TM. Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:515–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Spencer RG., Fishbein KW. Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times and concentrations in systems with chemical exchange using the one-pulse sequence: breakdown of the Ernst model for partial saturation in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 2000;142:120–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Ernst RR, Anderson WA. Application of Fourier transform spectroscopy to magnetic resonance. Rev Sci Instrum. 1966;37:93–102. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Gyngell ML. The steady-state signals in short-repetition-time sequences. J Magn Reson. 1989;81:474–483. [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Carr HY. Steady-state free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys Rev. 1958;112:1693–1701. [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Epel B, Halpern HJ. Comparison of pulse sequences for R1-based electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging. J Magn Reson. 2015;254:56–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Bydder GM, Young IR. MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:659–675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Bydder GM, Young IR. Clinical use of the partial saturation and saturation recovery sequences in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;9:1020–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Gupta RK. A new look at the method of variable nutation angle for the measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times using Fourier transform NMR. J Magn Reson. 1977;25:231–235. [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Subramanian S, Devasahayam N, Matsumoto S, Saito K, Mitchell JB, Krishna MC. Echo-based Single Point Imaging (ESPI): a novel pulsed EPR imaging modality for high spatial resolution and quantitative oximetry. J Magn Reson. 2012;218: 105–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Nelder J, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer J. 1965;7:308–313. [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Buonocore MH, Gao L. Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction. Magn Reson Med. 1997; 38:89–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Matsumoto A, Matsumoto S, Sowers AL, et al. Absolute oxygen tension (pO2) in murine fatty and muscle tissue as determined by EPR. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1530–1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures

FIGURE S1. The pixel intensity profiles as a function of TR. A. Phantom data in the 0% pO2 region. B and C. In vivo data of a mouse tumor for the top 1000 pixels, before and after probe abundance correction, respectively.

FIGURE S2. Overview of R1 and R2* determination methods. Single point images of a three-tube phantom calculated at TR=5, 8, and 12 μs and tp=1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 μs are shown in the black box. The rows above the box are the R2* and S0 maps calculated at the corresponding TR. Right, top row: The pO2 map calculated from R2* at TR=12 μs and the pO2 map calculated from R1. Right, bottom row: M0 and R1 maps calculated at tp=1.0 μs are indicated by the red arrow.

FIGURE S3. Bland-Altman plot comparing pixel to pixel pO2 values of the phantom calculated using (a) 22 TR values and (b) 3 TR values. The ordinate is (a) – (b) and the abscissa is their mean.

FIGURE S4. Relationship between R1 determined by SFR sequence and R2* of Oxo71 for pO2 in the range of 0 – 10%.

FIGURE S5. A. Phantom pO2 map calculated using data acquired at 12 TR values (4.2, 4.6, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14, 20, 25, 30 and 35 μs). B. Histograms of pO2 in the regions of tubes at 0%, 2%, and 5%. Scan time=14 min.

RESOURCES