Skip to main content
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open logoLink to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
. 2021 Apr 28;9(4):e3579. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003579

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) Effect on Public Sentiments Regarding Elective Plastic Surgery in the United States

Jiaxi Chen 1, Edward C Ray 1,
PMCID: PMC8081467  PMID: 33936920

Abstract

Background:

The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) has challenged the US's healthcare systems to adapt and innovate on multiple fronts. As the course of the COVID-19 pandemic changes, we explore the US public sentiments on resuming previously postponed elective plastic surgery procedures.

Methods:

A prospective national survey of one thousand US adults was conducted to study public perception of elective plastic surgery procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Binomial logarithmic multivariable regression modeling was employed to study the response data.

Results:

Nine hundred seventy-three participants were included in study. The majority (86.6%) believed elective plastic surgery should continue during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (79.6%) would not delay obtaining plastic surgery more than 6 months. Participants expressed concerns of contracting COVID-19 at elective surgery centers (67.5%) or at hospitals (68.5%). Participants who reside in the Midwest (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, P < 0.05) and participants between the ages of 41 and 60 years old (OR 2.8, P < 0.03) were more likely to resume elective plastic surgery. Participants who had undergone a COVID-19 test (OR 0.13, P < 0.04), contracted the COVID-19 infection (OR 0.26, P < 0.03), or were older than 60 years (OR 0.41, P < 0.02) were less likely to resume elective plastic surgery.

Conclusion:

The majority of the US adult participants (1) agree with resuming elective plastic surgery services, (2) but harbor some concerns of contracting COVID-19 during their procedures, and (3) agree with the majority of safety protocols taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION

Across the world, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has shaped and changed the course of individuals’ lives. At the time of this study, the United States had reported more than 25 million cases of COVID-19 infection and more than 400,000 associated deaths.1 When the US economy experienced a pause in nonessential sectors, nonemergency healthcare services and procedures were also put on hold.2 Nearly half (48%) of Americans say someone in their family skipped or delayed getting medical care due to the pandemic, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation health poll conducted in May 2020.3 The US healthcare system sustained upward of $300 billion loss in economic productivity.4,5 As a direct result of this downturn, the US medical centers adapted and invested in testing capabilities, personal protective equipment, and safety measures to meet the challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.4,6 As the epidemiologic trajectory of the pandemic changes, US surgeons and physicians now face the effects of reopening previously shuttered nonessential services and procedures.

Although there has been a wealth of literature describing clinical guidelines utilized to prevent the transmission of COVID-19, there is scarce information on the sentiments of the US public in regard to the pandemic.710 During this difficult time, plastic surgeons must find a way to maintain their practices while ensuring the health and safety of their communities.11 It is important to understand the heterogeneity of the US population and the equally heterogenous perceptions of COVID-19 reflected in the changing and diverse demographics of the United States.12 Today’s plastic surgeon will benefit from a better understanding of the insights, attitudes, and beliefs of the public concerning elective surgical procedures during the pandemic.13

The purpose of this study is to identify distinct segments of the US population that are affected differently by the COVID-19 pandemic and use their responses to advocate on behalf of the public. With this in mind, we conducted a nation-wide prospective survey to explore public opinion on the continuation of elective plastic surgery procedures during the pandemic. The information from this study is intended to help surgeons guide and advocate for their community’s well-being by understanding the concerns, beliefs, and attitudes of the US population.

METHODS

This prospective study was designed to survey adults proficient in spoken and written English residing in the United States. One thousand participants at least 18 years of age were recruited in October 2020. Participants oblivious to the present COVID-19 pandemic were excluded from the study. Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, Calif.) was selected to be the survey platform. Amazon Mechanical Turk (Amazon, Seattle, Wash.) was selected to be the survey distributor and participant base. The study was granted exemption from Institution Review Board oversight at our institution.

Amazon Mechanical Turk

Mechanical Turk (MTurk) is an online crowdsourcing marketplace with over 500,000 unique users, the majority of whom reside within the United States.14,15 From 2010 to 2019, MTurk developed a reputation as a reliable platform, contributing to quality healthcare research with multiple studies showing that the diversity of the MTurk workforce reflects that of the US population.14,15 MTurk has built technology which analyzes Worker performance, identifies high performing users, and monitors their performance over time.16 Users who have demonstrated excellence across a wide range of tasks are awarded the Masters Qualification.16 Masters must continue to pass rigorous statistical monitoring to maintain the MTurk Masters Qualification.16 To ensure the quality of responses, we made our survey only available to MTurk users who have met this highest designation.16 Each MTurk user was on average reimbursed $0.25 for their time and participation, Master MTurk users were reimbursed an additional 5%.

Survey Design

The survey was created to gauge US public attitudes and concerns with resuming elective plastic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Each participant was provided an overview of the study and given the option to withdraw from participation at anytime. After electing to participate in the study, participants were educated on the definitions of elective surgery, outpatient surgery center, hospital surgical unit, and on the current COVID-19 pandemic conditions in the United States. We defined elective surgery as nonemergent and nonurgent, quality-of-life-related surgery.17 We defined an outpatient surgery center as a healthcare facility where surgical procedures are performed and overnight stays are not permitted.17 All participants were referred to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website to learn about the most up-to-date guidelines surrounding COVID-19.18 To gauge attentiveness during our survey, study participants were asked the following engagement question: “How many states are in the United States?” Any participants who answered incorrectly were excluded from the study.

The survey consisted of 30 multiple-choice questions divided into 3 sections. The first section surveyed demographic characteristics, assessing age, gender, race, ethnicity, household income, place of residence, and health insurance status. Participants were asked about their prior plastic surgery experiences, interest in obtaining plastic surgery in the future, prior COVID-19 testing, and prior COVID-19 diagnosis. The second section assessed the participants’ beliefs on resuming elective plastic surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Special attention was given to capture the participants’ preference on having procedures performed at a hospital versus an outpatient surgery center. The third section assessed the participants’ beliefs regarding current safety practices taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the healthcare setting. We specifically wanted to investigate the public’s perception of telemedicine video clinic visits, COVID-19 testing, and potential COVID-19 vaccination. (See appendix, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which displays full survey, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/B649.)

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were employed to characterize the demographic makeup of the study participants. The distribution of participant age, race and ethnicity, gender, and geographic residence were each reported as percentages. Regression modeling was used to define the relationship and correlation between the independent variables (participant demographics) and dependent variables (eg, obtaining elective plastic surgery). Because of the binomial nature of the dependent variable, a logarithmic multivariable binomial regression model was used to analyze the data. The reference cohort for the binomial dependent variables was assigned to the participants of the study who answered “no” to resuming elective plastic surgery. The exponentiation of the B coefficient was referenced as the odds ratio for our regression model. Clinical significance was defined to be a P value of less than 0.05. All data were processed and analyzed utilizing SPSS (International Business Machines, Armonk, N.Y.).

RESULTS

A randomly assigned sample of 1000 US adults (MTurk volunteers) participated in the study. Twenty-seven participants did not pass the engagement question and were excluded. Of the remaining 973 participants, all were well-informed about the present COVID-19 pandemic. Within the sample cohort, most survey respondents identified as non-Hispanic Caucasian (56.6%), male gender (54.1%), privately insured (59.7%), 18–45 years old (80.4%), and evenly distributed across the US’s major geographic areas (Table 1). The majority of participants (68.4%) who expressed some interest in obtaining plastic surgery (9.3%) received a service or underwent a procedure from a plastic surgeon in the past (Table 1). Nearly, 11.4% of participants had COVID-19 testing and 2.1% of participants reported a prior COVID-19 infection (Table 1).

Table 1.

Participant Demographics

Variable Participants %
Total no. participants 973 (100%)
Age, y
 18–30 388 (39.9%)
 31–45 394 (40.5%)
 46–60 147 (15.1%)
 61 and older 44 (4.5%)
Sex
 Female 447 (45.9%)
 Male 526 (54.1%)
Race and ethnicity
 Asian 177 (18.2%)
 Black 112 (11.5%)
 Hispanic 78 (8.0%)
 Native American 25 (2.5%)
 White 551 (56.6%)
 More than 1 race 30 (3.1%)
Household annual income
 Less than $50,000 319 (32.8%)
 $50,000 to $75,000 320 (32.9%)
 $75,000 to $100,000 241 (24.8%)
 $100,00 to $200,000 79 (8.1%)
 $200,000 and more 14 (1.4%)
Place of residence in the US
 South 278 (28.5%)
 Midwest 200 (20.5%)
 Northeast 302 (31.0%)
 West Coast 112 (11.5%)
 Outside Continental US 81 (8.3%)
Health insurance
 Private 581 (59.7%)
 Medi-Care 135 (13.9%)
 Medi-Caid 137 (14.1%)
 Military/veterans insurance 5 (0.5%)
 Self-pay 115 (11.8%)
Prior COVID-19 testing
 Yes 111 (11.4%)
 No 862 (88.6%)
Prior COVID-19 infection
 Yes 21 (2.2%)
 No 952 (97.8%)
Personal health
 Healthy 296 (30.4%)
 Somewhat healthy 490 (50.4%)
 Neutral 159 (16.3%)
 Somewhat unhealthy 20 (2.1%)
 Unhealthy 8 (0.8%)
Prior plastic surgery
 Yes 91 (9.4%)
 No 882 (90.6%)
Interest in elective surgery
 Yes 666 (68.4%)
 No 307 (31.6%)

Baseline demographic characteristics of study participants.

COVID-19 and Plastic Surgery

The majority of participants (86.6%) felt elective plastic surgery should continue in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and most participants (74.8%) would undergo elective plastic surgery services and procedures without delay (Fig. 1). If the plastic surgery service or procedure had to be delayed, most participants (79.6%) would prefer to not delay more than 6 months (Fig. 2). Most participants expressed concerns of contracting COVID-19 at elective surgery centers (67.5%) and hospitals (65.9%) during their elective plastic surgery procedures (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

COVID-19 and elective plastic surgery procedure. National survey of US public reveals the majority (86.6%) of study participants agree with resuming/continuing elective plastic surgery procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic; 74.8% surveyed would undergo an elective procedure without delay.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Delaying elective plastic surgery procedure. If COVID-19 pandemic conditions caused temporary shutdown of elective services and procedures, most (79.6%) survey respondents would not delay their procedure by more than 6 months.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Surgical centers versus hospitals. Most participants were concerned or very concerned about contracting COVID-19 during their elective procedure at an elective surgery center (67.5%) and hospital (65.9%), respectively.

Binomial logarithmic multivariate regression analysis was used to model the interactions between independent variables. Compared to the overall study population, we found that participants in the age group 46–60 years old were 2.8 times more likely to resume elective plastic surgery during the pandemic, P < 0.03 (Table 2). Similarly, participants who reside in the Midwest were found to be 2.2 times more likely to resume elective plastic surgery, P < 0.05 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Multivariable Regression Analysis

Variable Participants For Resuming Plastic Surgery Against Resuming Plastic Surgery OR P
Age, y
 18–30 388 335 (86.3%) 53 (13.7%) 1.50 0.336
 31–45 394 344 (87.3%) 50 (12.7%) 2.06 0.079
 46–60 147 132 (89.8%) 15 (10.2%) 2.80 0.030
 61 and older 44 32 (72.7%) 12 (27.3%) 0.41 0.021
Sex
 Female 446 377 (84.5%) 69 (15.5%) 1.03 0.864
 Male 527 466 (88.4%) 61 (11.6%) 1.32 0.785
Race and ethnicity
 White 551 473 (85.8%) 78 (14.2%) 1.58 0.393
 Asian 177 157 (88.7%) 20 (11.3%) 2.31 0.140
 Black 112 100 (89.3%) 12 (10.7%) 1.90 0.288
 Hispanic 78 70 (89.8%) 8 (10.2%) 2.02 0.263
 Native American 25 21 (84.0%) 4 (16.0%) 0.91 0.907
 More than 1 race 30 22 (73.3%) 8 (26.7%) 1.24 0.512
Household annual income
 Less than $50,000 319 264 (82.8%) 55 (17.2%) 2.26 0.254
 $50,000 to $75,000 320 282 (88.1%) 38 (11.9%) 2.23 0.259
 $75,000 to $100,000 241 218 (90.5%) 23 (9.5%) 2.73 0.168
 $100,00 to $200,000 79 68 (86.1%) 11 (13.9%) 3.04 0.149
 $200,000 and more 14 11 (78.6%) 3 (21.4%) 2.52 0.789
Place of residence in the United States
 South 302 268 (88.7%) 34 (11.3%) 1.68 0.198
 Midwest 200 181 (90.5%) 19 (9.5%) 2.28 0.047
 Northeast 278 239 (86.0%) 39 (14.0%) 1.21 0.623
 West coast 112 93 (83.0%) 19 (17.0%) 3.04 0.149
 Outside continental US 81 62 (76.6%) 19 (23.4%) 1.85 0.592
Health insurance
 Private 581 499 (85.9%) 82 (14.1%) 1.20 0.548
 Medi-Care 135 126 (93.3%) 9 (6.7%) 1.34 0.545
 Medi-Caid 137 119 (86.9%) 18 (13.1%) 1.04 0.917
 Military/veterans insurance 5 5(100%) 0 (0%) 7.82 0.812
 Self-pay 115 94 (81.7%) 21 (18.3%) 1.32 0.548
Prior COVID-19 testing
 Yes 111 66 (59.5%) 45 (40.5%) 0.13 0.046
 No 862 733 (85.0%) 129 (15.0%) 1.23 0.415
Prior COVID-19 infection
 Yes 21 13 (61.9%) 8 (38.1%) 0.26 0.031
 No 952 822 (86.3%) 130 (13.7%) 1.40 0.246
Personal health
 Healthy 296 261 (88.2%) 35 (11.8%) 1.58 0.645
 Somewhat healthy 490 427 (87.1%) 63 (12.9%) 1.38 0.216
 Neutral 159 135 (84.9%) 24 (15.1%) 1.61 0.154
 Somewhat unhealthy 20 14 (70.0%) 6 (30.0%) 0.77 0.655
 Unhealthy 8 6 (75.0%) 2 (25.0%) 0.65 0.629
Prior plastic surgery
 Yes 91 87 (95.6%) 4 (4.4%) 1.56 0.423
 No 882 756 (85.7%) 126 (14.3%) 0.53 0.269
Interest in elective surgery
 Yes 666 619 (92.9%) 47 (7.1%) 1.98 0.786
 No 307 224 (73.0%) 83 (17.0%) 0.24 0.087

A binomial logarithmic regression analysis was used to model the relationship between the participant demographic characteristics and resuming elective plastic surgery. A P value of less than 0.05 is considered statistical significance.

OR, odds ratio.

Values in boldface indicate P < 0.05.

When compared to the overall study population, participants in the age cohort 61 years and older were 2.4 times less likely to support the resumption of elective plastic surgery during the pandemic, P < 0.02 and participants who have previously tested for COVID-19 were found to be 7.9 times less likely to favor resuming elective plastic surgery during the pandemic, P < 0.05 (Table 2). The data also indicated that participants who previously experienced COVID-19 infection were 3.8 times less likely to recommend resuming elective plastic surgery during the pandemic, P < 0.03 (Table 2). No statistically significant relationships were discovered between a participant’s gender, race, income, or insurance and preference for continuing elective plastic surgery.

Elective Plastic Surgery Safety Practices

The majority of participants believed safety practices such as face mask and eye protection (90.3%), hand washing and cleansing commonly used surfaces (87.1%), and social distancing at least 6 feet (86.1%) were important to prevent spread of COVID-19 (Fig. 4). The majority of participants also felt that patients undergoing surgery (84.0%) and surgical center/hospital staff (84.4%) should be routinely tested for COVID (Fig. 4). Once a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine is approved, the majority of participants believe that those undergoing surgery should be vaccinated (78.7%) as should surgical center/hospital staff (80.4%) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Safety procedure importance during COVID-19. The majority of participants surveyed believed safety practices such as mask and eye protection, hand washing, social distancing, COVID-19 testing, and COVID-19 vaccination were important to prevent spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The majority of study participants preferred in-person over telemedicine visits for their preoperative appointment (65.1% in-person versus 34.9% telemedicine; see Table 3). When asked about postoperative follow-up, participants also preferred in-person visits over telemedicine visits (59.8% in-person versus 40.2% telemedicine; see Table 3). When queried about the most important factor when considering elective plastic surgery, participants valued the plastic surgeon’s reputation (32.3%) and hospital’s reputation (31.3%) but were less concerned about the location of the hospital (15.9%), safety practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (14.6%), and personal cost associated with surgery (5.8%).

Table 3.

Telemedicine Preoperative and Postoperative Visits

Question Responses
What is your preference for your preoperative clinic visit? In-person visit634 (65.2%) Telemedicine visit339 (34.8%)
What is your preference for your postoperative clinic visit? In-person visit582 (59.8%) Telemedicine visit305 (40.2%)

Comparison between participants' preferences toward in-person clinic visits versus telemedicine clinic visits for preoperative and postoperative clinic.

DISCUSSION

This prospective national survey of US adults in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic examines public perception of elective plastic surgery procedures. The demographic profile of the United States is well represented by the cohort surveyed with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, geographic residence, and health insurance. The principal findings synthesized from the data are: (1) the US public believes in resuming/continuing elective plastic surgery during the pandemic; (2) the US public also remains at least somewhat concerned that they may contract the virus while obtaining their elective procedure; (3) the US public agrees with current safety precautions taken by medical facilities to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

Participants residing in Midwestern states (ie, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin) were more likely to support the continuation of elective plastic surgery. Data obtained during the first 5 months of the pandemic suggest that the incidence of COVID-19 varied widely among different geographic regions of the United States.19,20 The US CDC reported from June to July 2020, COVID-19 “hotspots” were mostly outside the Midwest.19 The lower number of regional COVID-19 cases along with less access to elective plastic surgery services and procedures may, in part, explain why the study participants from the Midwest favor resuming elective plastic surgery. Compared to the general population of the study, participants 46–60 years old were found more likely to support continuing elective plastic surgery and participants over 60 years of age were less likely to support elective plastic surgery. This finding is congruent with epidemiologic data on COVID-19, which suggests that older adults have increased morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 infection, and they are more concerned about these health risks.2123 The over 60 population is clearly more vulnerable to more serious complications of COVID-19, and plastic surgeons must consider this fact when offering elective procedures.21,24

The participants who underwent COVID-19 testing or had previously been diagnosed with COVID-19 infection were less likely to support the continuation of elective plastic surgery. This segment of the US population will, of course, increase as the pandemic persists. In fact, the most recent projections and models from the US CDC, at the time of the writing, predict between 450,000 to 960,000 new COVID-19 cases every week during the winter months of 2020 and beyond. Plastic surgeons must empathize with those who have suffered from, or are most fearful of, COVID-19 and the potential implications of infection. At a minimum, adherence to strict safety protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19 will help address some of the most pressing concerns in this growing segment of the population.11,25 In the following section, we describe our institution’s safety practices and protocols for conducting elective surgical procedures during the pandemic.

Safety Protocol

Although most study participants believe elective plastic surgical procedures should resume, the majority still harbor concerns about contracting the virus during their elective procedure. It is the duty of physicians to ensure that the clinics, surgery centers, and hospitals, where we perform our procedures and follow rigorous safety protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

At our institution, a rigorous set of safety practices are employed to prevent the spread of COVID-19 before, during and after all procedures. All patients are required to obtain nucleic acid-based COVID-19 testing less than 48 hours before their procedure. Patients who test positive for the novel coronavirus are not eligible to undergo elective procedures. Those who have acute respiratory symptoms such as shortness of breath, coughing, or unexplained sore throat are also ineligible to undergo elective procedures. During hospital and clinic encounters, all staff are required to wear face masks, eye protection, as well as disposable gloves for all patient encounters. All hospital and clinic staff are screened daily with temperature assessment and questioned about any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection. Those with possible signs or symptoms if infection undergo testing for COVID-19 and are required to quarantine at home until testing is negative and symptoms resolve. Postprocedurally, patients are given the option for a telemedicine video follow-up whenever in-person visits are not critical. Any patient requiring postprocedure hospital admission is transferred to a surgical inpatient floor where all neighboring patients have had a negative nucleic acid-based COVID-19 test. We believe these practices should be adopted as standard practice for every patient encounter.

Future of Elective Plastic Surgery

As a matter of necessity, telemedicine has experienced an unprecedented boom during the pandemic. Our study found that 30%–40% of participants preferred video appointments over in-person visits. Recent literature reports that European and the US plastic surgeons have had very high telemedicine adoption rates, exceeding 50% during the pandemic.2628 These studies demonstrate that plastic surgeons have implemented telemedicine to minimize patient–physician exposure and to decrease the spread of COVID-19.29 Besides saving time and avoiding travel-related expenses, patients having video visits report higher rates of overall satisfaction when compared to in-person visits.29,30 We strongly believe the trend of adopting telemedicine will persists even after the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided, and may become the default option for some routine outpatient clinic visits. After being informed of the differences between an outpatient surgery center and hospital, study participants showed no preference for one over the other. Thus, from a public perspective, surgical venue should not be a barrier to resuming or continuing elective surgical procedures.

Improvements in COVID-19 testing and the development of a safe and effective vaccine are currently areas of intense global effort.31,32 The majority of study participants would be willing to undergo a COVID-19 test and receive an approved COVID-19 vaccine to undergo elective plastic surgery services. Once a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccination is available, we believe the global implementation with subsequent immunization against COVID-19 will provide the pivotal step in ensuring the absolute safety of elective surgical procedures. As suggested by Sarac et al,33,34 the responsibility of keeping our communities safe while performing elective plastic surgery procedures ultimately rests on the plastic and reconstructive surgeons’ shoulders.

Limitations

The study cohort recruited to conduct our survey study was assembled from the MTurk workforce. Previous studies have validated the MTurk workforce as representative of the general US public.15,35 We acknowledge that the MTurk workforce is skewed toward younger and less affluent segments of the US population. Previous studies conducted using MTurk have discovered similar age distribution discrepancies, with younger age groups being overrepresented.36,37 The MTurk survey taker, as with any anonymous survey taker, is susceptible to providing disingenuous responses because of the constraints of limited time. We acknowledge that a small but detectable portion of study participants responded with disingenuous responses based on our results. Despite the shortcoming of MTurk, the alternative which is the traditional approach to obtaining public opinion involves in-person interviews or telephone polls, which on average cost 45 times as much as online methods.38 Given the present COVID-19 pandemic conditions, the utilization of online workforces, despite having shortcomings in certain demographic areas, will likely be more widely adopted.

In reviewing the methodology of this study, one shortcoming is that a single survey does not adequately capture the evolving public sentiments on COVID-19. To demonstrate the temporal changes influenced by significant current events, future follow-up investigations can be conducted on a semiannual basis to depict how the US public sentiment changes.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective national survey of US adults conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic reports current US public opinions on the continuation of elective plastic surgery procedures. The demographic heterogeneity of the US population is well represented in our cohort based on sex, race, ethnicity, geographic residence, and health insurance status. Three key findings of the study are (1) the majority of study participants believe in resuming/continuing plastic surgery during the present COVID-19 pandemic; (2) the majority of participants remain concerned about contracting the virus while having elective procedures; and (3) the majority of participants agree with the majority of current safety measures implemented to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The segments of the US population more hesitant to resume/continue plastic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic are Americans 61 years of age and older and Americans who have had a COVID-19 infection or testing. Plastic surgeons should invest extra time and effort to address each of the concerns these vulnerable cohorts may endorse.

Supplementary Material

gox-9-e3579-s001.pdf (148.7KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Published online 28 April 2021.

This study was funded by the Department of Surgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Related Digital Media are available in the full-text version of the article on www.PRSGlobalOpen.com.

This study is exempt from IRB oversight.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Prevention CfDCa. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020. 2020. Available at: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days. Accessed October 25, 2020.
  • 2.Surgeons ACo. COVID-19 Guidelines for Triage of Plastic Surgery Patients. American College of Surgeons. 2020. Available at: https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-case/plastic-surgery. Accessed October 25, 2020.
  • 3.Hamel L, Kearney A, Kirzinger A. KFF Health Tracking Poll-May 2020: Impact of Coronavirus on Personal Health, Economic and Food Security, and Medicaid. San Francisco, Calif.: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2020. Available at: https://www.kff.org/report-section/kff-health-tracking-poll-may-2020-health-and-economic-impacts/. Accessed April 16, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Association AH. Hospitals and Health Systems Continue to Face Unprecedented Financial Challenges due to COVID-19. American Hospital Association. American Hospital Association Web site. 2020. Available at: https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2020/06/aha-covid19-financial-impact-report.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2020.
  • 5.Negopdiev D, Collaborative C, Hoste E. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: Global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1440–1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blumenthal D, Fowler EJ, Abrams M, et al. COVID-19—implications for the Health Care System. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1483–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moverman MA, Puzzitiello RN, Pagani NR, et al. Public perceptions of resuming elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:397–402.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Diaz A, Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, et al. Elective surgery in the time of COVID-19. Am J Surg. 2020;219:900–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chi D, Chen AD, Dorante MI, et al. Plastic surgery in the time of COVID-19. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37:124–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ozturk CN, Kuruoglu D, Ozturk C, et al. Plastic surgery and the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of clinical guidelines. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;85(2S Suppl 2):S155–S160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Squitieri L, Chung KC. Surviving the COVID-19 pandemic: surge capacity planning for nonemergent surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:437–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Guilamo-Ramos V, Mena L, et al. Risk for COVID-19 infection and death among Latinos in the United States: examining heterogeneity in transmission dynamics. Ann Epidemiol. 2020;5:46–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ganesh Kumar N, Garfein ES, Cederna PS, et al. Responding to the COVID-19 crisis: If not now, then when? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:711–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chandler J, Shapiro D. Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mortensen K, Hughes TL. Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33:533–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Turk AM. Amazon Mechanical Turk. 2020. Available at: https://www.mturk.com. Accessed August 20, 2020.
  • 17.Services CfMM. Non-emergent, elective medical services, and treatment recommendations. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website. 2020. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/cms-non-emergent-elective-medical-recommendations.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2020.
  • 18.Prevention CfDCa. CDC COVID-19 Information Page. CDC. United States COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by State website. 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html. Accessed October 25, 2020.
  • 19.Oster AM, Kang GJ, Cha AE, et al. Trends in number and distribution of COVID-19 hotspot counties—United States, March 8–July 15, 2020. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 2020;69:1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gray DM, II, Anyane-Yeboa A, Balzora S, et al. COVID-19 and the other pandemic: Populations made vulnerable by systemic inequity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:520–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Daoust JF. Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0235590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jordan RE, Adab P, Cheng KK. COVID-19: risk factors for severe disease and death. BMJ. 2020;368:m1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shahid Z, Kalayanamitra R, McClafferty B, et al. COVID-19 and older adults: what we know. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68:926–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Daoust J-F, Nadeau R, Dassonneville R, et al. How to survey citizens’ compliance with COVID-19 Public Health Measures: evidence from three survey experiments. J Exp Political Sci. 2020:1–8 (E-pub ahead of print). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, Wilson SC, et al. The impact of COVID-19-based suspension of surgeries on plastic surgery practices: a survey of ACAPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e3119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Al-Jabir A, Kerwan A, Nicola M, et al. Impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical practice-part 2 (surgical prioritisation). Int J Surg. 2020;79:233–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gillman-Wells CC, Sankar TK, Vadodaria S. COVID-19 reducing the risks: telemedicine is the new norm for surgical consultations and communications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45:343–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Salehi PP, Torabi SJ, Lee YH, et al. Telemedicine practices of facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons in the United States: the effect of novel coronavirus-19. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22:464–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saad NH, AlQattan HT, Ochoa O, et al. Telemedicine and plastic and reconstructive surgery: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and directions for the future. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:680e–683e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Powell RE, Henstenburg JM, Cooper G, et al. Patient perceptions of telehealth primary care video visits. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15:225–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Graham BS. Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development. Science. 2020;368:945–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Corey L, Mascola JR, Fauci AS, et al. A strategic approach to COVID-19 vaccine R&D. Science. 2020;368:948–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, Wilson SC, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 state guidelines on elective surgery: considerations for plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schoenbrunner AR, Sarac BA, Janis JE. A summary of recommendations for plastic surgeons during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e3039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis. 2012;20:351–368. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Walters K, Christakis DA, Wright DR. Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.? PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mortensen K, Alcalá MG, French MT, et al. Self-reported health status differs for Amazon’s Mechanical Turk respondents compared with nationally representative surveys. Med Care. 2018;56:211–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:3–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gox-9-e3579-s001.pdf (148.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES