Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0249919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249919

Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities

Kellen Natalice Vilharva 1, Daniel Ferreira Leite 1, Helder Freitas dos Santos 1, Katia Ávila Antunes 1, Paola dos Santos da Rocha 1, Jaqueline Ferreira Campos 1, Claudiane Vilharroel Almeida 2, Maria Lígia Rodrigues Macedo 2, Denise Brentan Silva 3, Caio Fernando Ramalho de Oliveira 1,2, Edson Lucas dos Santos 1, Kely de Picoli Souza 1,*
Editor: Branislav T Šiler4
PMCID: PMC8084164  PMID: 33914744

Abstract

Zootherapy is a traditional secular practice among the Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous ethnic group living in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. My people use the oil extracted from larvae of the snout beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) to treat and heal skin wounds and respiratory diseases. Based on this ethnopharmacological knowledge, the chemical composition and antioxidant, antimicrobial, and healing properties of R. palmarum larvae oil (RPLO) were investigated, as well as possible toxic effects, through in vitro and in vivo assays. The chemical composition of the RPLO was determined using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The antioxidant activity of RPLO was investigated through the direct 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that are pathogenic to humans. The healing properties of RPLO were investigated by performing a cell migration assay using human lung fibroblasts (MRC-5), and the toxicity was analyzed, in vivo, using a Caenorhabditis elegans model and MRC-5 cells, in vitro. RPLO contains 52.2% saturated fatty acids and 47.4% unsaturated fatty acids, with palmitic acid (42.7%) and oleic acid (40%) representing its major components, respectively. RPLO possesses direct antioxidant activity, with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 46.15 mg.ml-1. The antimicrobial activity of RPLO was not observed at a concentration of 1% (v/v). RPLO did not alter the viability of MRC-5 cells and did not exert toxic effects on C. elegans. Furthermore, MRC-5 cells incubated with 0.5% RPLO showed a higher rate of cell migration than that of the control group, supporting its healing properties. Taken together, RPLO possesses direct antioxidant activity and the potential to aid in the healing process and is not toxic toward in vitro and in vivo models, corroborating the safe use of the oil in traditional Guarani-Kaiowá medicine.

Introduction

Traditional knowledge (TK) is the result of the secular experience of these communities living among the local biodiversity, their relationship with the environment, and their use of different species for their benefit [14]. The indigenous Guarani-Kaiowá community is located in the Central-West region of Brazil. Although the practice of zootherapy is common among the Guarani-Kaiowá, records of the species used, the purposes of treatments, and the forms of drug preparation are scarce. Some of the secular knowledge related to zootherapy is transmitted to the younger generation by the Maxuypy, the matriarch of the family. In this manner, I, Kellen Natalice Villarva, a biologist, and one of the authors of this study, received part of the knowledge of my ethnicity from my grandmother.

Insects are routinely used in indigenous communities for medicinal purposes [5]. The use of Mbuku, the name given to the beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in its larval stage is part of the Guarani-Kaiowá TK, whether in its sacred tales, in its rituals or for food and medicinal purposes. The oil extracted from the integument of R. palmarum larvae is used by other peoples of South America in food and as a treatment for respiratory diseases and skin infections [69]. While the use of animal fat in the treatment of diseases by indigenous people is part of TK, the literature describes the antioxidant properties of unsaturated and saturated fatty acids that compose the triglycerides of animals and attributes these compounds to the ability to neutralize oxidative damage [10], both after topical use and oral ingestion [11, 12].

In the Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous community, R. palmarum larvae are used as a source of oil for the treatment of wounds to accelerate healing and prevent infection. This oil is also used to treat respiratory ailments through its application to the chest and back. This study presents knowledge and teachings about the insects used by the Guarani-Kaiowá. The record of indigenous TK and the tale of the creation of Mbuku are described in S1 File. Given the scarcity of information regarding the chemical composition and pharmacological properties of R. palmarum oil, we recorded the traditional process for collecting larvae and obtaining R. palmarum larvae oil (RPLO) according to the Guarani-Kaiowá TK. In addition to determining the chemical features of RPLO, we investigated its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and healing properties, as well as its possible toxicity.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Part of this study was carried out in Takuara village, located in the municipality of Juti, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. The residents who participated of process of larvae collection has given written informed consent to publish case details. Authorization for the collection of R. palmarum larvae was granted by Mrs. Júlia Cavalheiro, the matriarch and leader of the Takuara village. The field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

Obtaining R. palmarum larvae oil

In the village, the process for obtaining oil from R. palmarum larvae is performed during the day, mainly by the mothers and grandmothers of the family. As part of the ritual of paying respect to the protectors and the owners of the forest and the animals, the collectors pray before entering the forest. The larvae are collected by opening the stipe of previously felled palm trees with the aid of tools such as a knife and ax (Fig 1). After larvae collection, the oil extraction is performed exclusively by women, who are gathered in a group of a maximum of three people. Importantly, as part of the Guarani-Kaiowá ritual, the entire process must be performed in silence. The larvae are placed in a container that is placed on the fire; at which time the oil is extracted from the larval carcass. In the village, the extracted oil may be stored together with or without the larval carcasses in closed containers to be used when needed.

Fig 1. Collection of R. palmarum larvae.

Fig 1

(A) Palm trees felled; (B) palm branches being opened; (C) fibers where the larvae develop, and (D) collection of the larvae.

For this study, R. palmarum larvae were collected in Takuara village (22°43’10.1"S 54°38’10.9"W), which is located in the municipality of Juti, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in February 2019. During the collection, the larvae were placed in containers containing palm stipe as a substrate and transported to the Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioprospecting Research applied to Metabolism (GEBBAM), Federal University of Grande Dourados (UFGD). A total of 30 larvae were collected, washed with distilled water, dried with paper towels, weighed, and frozen (-20°C) until the time of oil extraction.

The procedure for extracting RPLO reproduced the traditional method performed in Takuara village. The larvae were thawed overnight in a refrigerator (4°C) and cut into pieces to allow the extravasation of the internal contents. Then, the larvae were heated on a glass plate at a controlled temperature (150°C) for 15 min. During the heating, the larvae were stirred with a glass rod to prevent them from adhering to the glass. At the end of the process, the oil was separated from the carcasses by filtration, its volume was determined, and 15 ml of oil divided into aliquots were obtained (Fig 2). For use in the assays, the oil was aliquoted into 2-ml microtubes and stored at room temperature in the dark.

Fig 2. Process of obtaining oil from R. palmarum larvae.

Fig 2

(A) Larvae of different sizes; (B) thawing of the larvae; (C) heating process, where it is possible to observe the release of oil next to the larvae integument and (D) oil collected at the end of the heating step.

Determination of the chemical composition of RPLO

To evaluate the fatty acid composition of RPLO the transesterification reaction was performed using the method described by Koohikamali et al. [13]. First, 2.5 ml of a 1 M sodium methoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil) solution was added to 10 mg of the oil and incubated at 70°C for 30 min. The solution was incubated at room temperature for 3 h. Next, 1.5 ml of ultrapure water were added to the mixture, and the free fatty acids were extracted with 1 ml of hexane, followed by stirring and incubation of the mixture for 15 min. The hexane fraction was collected after the formation of the water: hexane phases. Hexane extraction was performed three times, for a total volume of 3 ml. Subsequently, the hexane fractions were concentrated to a final volume of 1 ml, and 1 μl was analyzed using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

The oil analyzes were performed in a gas chromatograph Shimadzu QP2010 coupled to a mass spectrometer, operating in electronic ionization (EI), using 70 eV ionization energy. An Rtx-5MS chromatographic column (30 m x 0.25 mm, 0.25 mm thick) was used with helium as a carrier gas at a pressure of 91.2 kPa and a flow rate of 1.4 ml.min-1. The split ratios were 70 and 10 for the transesterification reaction analyzis. For the analysis of the transesterification reaction, the temperature programming was 60°C for 3 min, 60–310°C with increments of 6°C. min-1 and 310°C for 13 min. The databases WILEY 7 and NIST 11 were applied to identify the compounds present in the oil.

Antioxidant activity of RPLO

The antioxidant capacity of RPLO was evaluated using the direct 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method described by Gupta and Gupta in 2011, with minor modifications [14]. In this assay, different concentrations of RPLO (13–105 mg.ml-1), diluted in chloroform, were added to 3 ml of DPPH solution (0.11 mM DPPH prepared in chloroform). Then, the solution was homogenized and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, protected from light. Subsequently, the absorbance of the samples was measured at 517 nm in a T70 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (PG Instruments Limited, Leicestershire, United Kingdom). The Trolox compound was used as a reference antioxidant. The capture percentage was calculated using the equation:

DPPHuptakepercentage=1-AbssampleAbsnegativecontrolx100

Abs sample refers to the mixture of DPPH with different concentrations of RPLO and Abs negative control is the absorbance of DPPH solution (0.11 mM DPPH in chloroform). The concentration of RPLO required to inhibit 50% (IC50) the formation of DPPH radical was also determined. The antioxidant activity was determined through the average of three independent experiments carried out in triplicate (n = 9).

Antimicrobial activity of RPLO

The antimicrobial activity of RPLO was evaluated by the broth microdilution technique [15], performed in 96-wells microplates. The bacterial inoculum was prepared using the direct growth method. Colonies isolated on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) were placed in 0.9% sterile NaCl solution until turbidity equal to 0.5 on the Mac Farland scale (1x108 CFU.ml-1), determined in a turbidimeter (MS Tecnopon, São Paulo, Brazil). The bacterial suspension was diluted 1:20 (v/v), thus reaching a concentration of 5x106 CFU.ml-1. Gram-positive strains Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 35983, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984, Staphylococcus haemolyticus ATCC 49453, Staphylococcus saprophyticus ATCC 29970, and Gram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606, Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 1960, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047, Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, Klebsiella oxytoca ATCC 13182, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 12453, Salmonella enterica ATCC 51741, and Serratia marcescens ATCC 13880 were used.

The diluted bacterial suspension (5x106 CFU.ml-1) was added to the wells of the microplate containing the Mueller Hinton (MH) culture medium, containing 1% oil (v/v). The bacterial concentration in each well was 5x105 CFU.ml-1. An aliquot of the RPLO was prepared in a 0.9% sterile NaCl solution and used to prepare working solutions containing 10% of the RPLO. In each well, 80 μl of MH broth, 10 μl of the oil working solution, and, subsequently, 10 μl of the bacterial inoculum were added, making a volume of oil in the well of 1%. As a positive control of growth inhibition, 80 μl of MH broth, 10 μl of the antibiotic chloramphenicol at a concentration of 4 μg.ml-1 and 10 μl of the bacterial inoculum were added to the well. The concentration of chloramphenicol used in the study represents the minimum bactericidal concentration (BMC). As a negative control of growth inhibition, 80 μl of MH broth, 10 μl of sterile 0.9% NaCl solution, and 10 μL of the bacterial inoculum were added to the well. The experiments were carried out in triplicate (n = 9) through three independent assays.

The microplate was incubated at 37°C under constant agitation and monitored at 30 min intervals in a Multiskan GO microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, São Paulo, Brazil) at 595 nm. After 18 h of the experiment, the percentage of bacterial growth inhibition was calculated using the last reading of the exponential growth phase, according to the equation:

Percentageofgrowthinhibition=1-AbssampleAbsnegativecontrolx100

Abs sample refers to samples containing RPLO in different concentrations and Abs negative control is the absorbance of the negative growth inhibition control. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was that which inhibited 100% of bacterial growth.

Cell culture, viability, and migration

The human lung fibroblast cell line MRC-5 was cultured in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics (5 mg.ml-1 penicillin, 5 mg.ml-1 streptomycin, and 10 mg.ml-1 neomycin; Gibco/Invitrogen, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cells were cultured in an incubator with a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂ at 37°C.

Cell viability was evaluated using a colorimetric assay with the reagent 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). For this assay, 5x10³ cells were plated in each well of a 96-well microplate and incubated with different concentrations of RPLO (0.1 to 0.5% of the total volume) for 24 h. Next, 100 μl of MTT (0.5 mg.ml-1, prepared in DMEM medium) were added to each well, followed by another incubation for 4 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the medium containing MTT was removed, and 100 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to the wells to solubilize the formazan crystals. The absorbance was measured at 630 nm using a SpectraMax 250 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, California, USA). The inhibition of cell viability was calculated using the equation:

Cellviability(%)=AbstreatedcellsAbspositivecontrolcellsx100

Abs treated cells refer to the samples incubated with RPLO and Abs positive control is the absorbance of the cells incubated only with culture medium. MRC-5 fibroblasts were cultured in 24-well microplates at a density of 8x104 cells/well with DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum for 24 h to investigate the ability of RPLO to stimulate cell migration. After the cells had adhered to the plates, the culture medium was aspirated, and a vertical streak was generated in each well with a 1,000-μl pipette tip. Then, the wells were washed with PBS and photographed. Five hundred microliters of DMEM containing 0.5% RPLO were added to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. For the control treatment, only the DMEM medium was added, without the addition of RPLO. At the end of the 24-h period, the culture medium was aspirated, and the wells were photographed. Three images of each well were acquired: one in the center of the well and the others at equidistant positions between the middle and the edges of the well, as shown in S1 File. The areas to be photographed were marked with a permanent pen to ensure that the images captured at 0 and 24 h were acquired from the same position. The images captured at 0 (after the creation of the wound with the pipette tip) and 24 h were analyzed with ImageJ software and used to calculate the area without cells and consequently the cell migration rate. This assay was performed in triplicate (n = 9), and the results are presented as the wound areas in mm2, according to the method described by Chen et al. [16].

Viability test in a Caenorhabditis elegans model

The nematode C. elegans wild-type N2 was used for the in vivo experiments. The nematodes were maintained at a temperature of 20°C, reared in Petri dishes containing nematode growth medium (NGM), and fed with Escherichia coli OP50 bacteria [17].

The RPLO acute toxicity test was performed using the method described by Bonamigo et al. [18]. Ten young adult nematodes (L4) were transferred to each well of a 96-well microplate and exposed to 200 μl of M9 medium containing different RPLO concentrations ranging from 1 to 4.5%. The animals were incubated at 20°C for 24 and 48 h. As a negative control, the nematodes were incubated with 200 μl of M9 culture medium. After the incubation period, the viability of the nematodes was evaluated by assessing their sensitivity to touch with a platinum loop. The nematodes were evaluated using a Motic SMZ-140 & W10X/23 stereomicroscope. The results were reported as the means of three independent tests performed in triplicate (n = 30).

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Prior to the statistical analysis, Levene´s test of homogeneity of variances was used to assume that variances are equal across groups or samples and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the data. The mean values of the cell migration rate were analyzed by One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post-test. In in vivo assays, a t-test was used to determine differences between groups. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software. The results were considered to be statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Yield and chemical composition of RPLO

The process for obtaining the oil was reproduced according to the Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous method. The determination of the oil yield was based on the mean of three extractions. The mean oil content was 0.15 ml.g-1 of the larva. At the end of the RPLO extraction process, the oil was yellow and had an odor and viscosity characteristic of the oil processed at Takuara village. Thus, the experiments were continued.

Saturated and unsaturated fatty acids were identified in the RPLO, which are shown in Table 1. The determination of the chemical composition revealed that RPLO comprises saturated (SFA) and unsaturated (UFA) fatty acids, with a slightly higher SFA content. Palmitic (16:0), myristic (14:0) and stearic (18:0) acids were the major SFAs. Oleic (18:1, ω-9), palmitoleic (16:1, ω-7), and linoleic (18:2, ω-6) acids were identified as UFAs, representing the omega-6, -7 and -9 families, respectively.

Table 1. Fatty acids identified in the RPLO.

Peak RT (min) Compound Number of carbons: unsaturation position %
1 19.1 Dodecanoic acid (lauric acid) 12:0 0.1
2 22.9 Tetradecanoic acid (myristic acid) 14:0 5.4
3 26.0 Hexadecenoic acid (palmitoleic acid) 16:1 (ω-7) 6.3
4 26.4 Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) 16:0 42.7
5 29.0 9,12-octadecadinoic acid (linoleic acid) 18:2 (ω-6) 1.1
6 29.1 9-octadenoic acid (oleic acid) 18:1 (ω-9) 40.0
7 29.5 Octadecanoic acid (stearic acid) 18:0 3.1
8 32.3 Eicosanoic acid (arachidic acid) 20:0 0.9
SFA 52.2
UFA 47.4
Total 99.6

RT: Retention time; SFA: saturated fatty acids; UFA: unsaturated fatty acids.

Antioxidant activity of RPLO

The antioxidant activity of RPLO was determined using the DPPH radical scavenging assay. The antioxidant activity of RPLO was concentration-dependent, generating a dose-response curve. Table 2 shows the IC50 values of RPLO and of the antioxidant Trolox, which was used as a reference antioxidant because it is an analog of vitamin E, a fat-soluble vitamin.

Table 2. Determination of the IC50 values for RPLO and Trolox, the reference antioxidant, in the direct DPPH radical scavenging assay.

Compound IC50 (mg.ml-1)
RPLO 46.31 ± 3.02
Trolox 3.88 ± 0.57

Antimicrobial activity of the RPLO

The antibacterial activity of RPLO was evaluated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). As shown in Table 3, the oil did not exhibit antimicrobial activity against any bacteria up to the maximum concentration tested (1%). At higher concentrations, the oil interfered with the absorbance reading of the assay. For this reason, higher concentrations were not used.

Table 3. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of RPLO.

The antibiotic chloramphenicol was used as a positive control for the inhibition of bacterial growth.

Bacteria MIC MBC Chloramphenicol (μM)
Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 35983 N.D. N.D. 24
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 N.D. N.D. 12
Staphylococcus haemolyticus ATCC 49453 N.D. N.D. 12
Staphylococcus saprophyticus ATCC 29970 N.D. N.D. 24
Gram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606 N.D. N.D. 24
Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048 N.D. N.D. 12
Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047 N.D. N.D. 12
Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 N.D. N.D. 24
Klebsiella oxytoca ATCC 13182 N.D. N.D. 12
Proteus mirabilis ATCC 12453 N.D. N.D. 24
Salmonella enterica ATCC 51741 N.D. N.D. 12
Serratia marcescens ATCC 13880 N.D. N.D. 12

N.D. Not determined at the concentration tested.

Effect of RPLO on the viability of MRC-5 cells

According to Fig 3, the average viability of the control cells and the cells incubated with RPLO, in concentrations between 0.1 and 0.5%, did not differ statistically. RPLO concentrations greater than 0.5% were not analyzed due to changes in turbidity of the medium, which influenced the photometric reading. For this reason, all experiments were carried out with RPLO at a maximum concentration of 0.5%.

Fig 3. Viability of MRC-5 cells incubated with different concentrations of RPLO for 24 h.

Fig 3

The graph shows the means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n = 9). The observed changes were not statistically significant (t-test).

Effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells

The effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells was observed at 0 and 24 h after the incubation with RPLO. As shown in Fig 4A, at time 0 h, the control and RPLO-treated wells had similar areas, being the empty areas resulted from the removal of the cells. After 24 h, a higher reduction in the exposed area was observed in the wells treated with 0.5% RPLO compared to the control. The cell migration rate was statistically increased by 60% in the wells treated with RPLO compared to the wells receiving the control treatment (Fig 4B).

Fig 4. The effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells.

Fig 4

(A) Representative image from assay. The wound areas were determined at 0 h and after 24 h of incubation. Control cells were incubated with culture media. Cells incubated with 0.5% of oil were named RPLO. Scale bar is 1 mm. (B) The graph shows the means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n = 9). An asterisk (*) indicate statistically significant differences between mean values (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-test, p <0.05).

Toxicity of RPLO in a C. elegans model

None of the RPLO concentrations was able to affect the C. elegans viability (Fig 5), reinforcing that the tested concentrations of RPLO did not exert acute toxic effects in vivo.

Fig 5. Acute toxicity of RPLO in the C. elegans experimental model in vivo.

Fig 5

Viability was recorded at (A) 24 h and (B) 48 h of treatment. The graph shows the means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n = 90). The observed changes were not statistically significant (t-test).

Discussion

The TK is a cultural element of the social, religious, economic, and healthy relationships of indigenous peoples. Within this knowledge, the use of animals for the treatment of diseases is a practice that has been maintained for centuries from generation to generation, particularly through the oral transmission of this knowledge. Changes in the lifestyle of indigenous communities have hindered their abilities to maintain customs that favor orality while increasing access to other means of recording, transmitting, and revisiting this knowledge. The inclusion of indigenous people in universities has allowed knowledge holders to investigate the potential pharmacological properties of traditional medicines. Thus, a Guarani-Kaiowá woman (the first author of this manuscript) records for the first time the knowledge of the use of RPLO by her community. The present study described the antioxidant activities and healing potential of RPLO and the absence of toxic effects, consistent with its traditional use in wound healing.

Traditionally, indigenous communities maximize the rational consumption of natural resources. An example of this practice is the method used to obtain R. palmarum larvae. Part of the stipes of palm trees felled for the construction of houses is left on the forest floor, at which time the R. palmarum beetles lay their eggs. Later, the women return to the forest to collect the larvae. In addition to the use of stipes for building houses and obtaining larvae, the fibers of the palm leaves are used to make nets and as roofs for houses. The traditional method of obtaining R. palmarum larvae only occurs in villages with a considerable available area of natural forest. Thus, access to local biodiversity allows the establishment of a permanent ecological balance with adequate management and sustainable extraction to meet the demands of the community.

Most of the drugs on the market are derived from plants [19]. However, the list of extracts and molecules isolated from animals is increasing [20, 21]. RPLO is used by the Guarani-Kaiowá community and other indigenous communities for food [7] and medicinal purposes [6]. The chemical composition of RPLO revealed the presence of saturated [palmitic acid (C16:0), 42.7%], and unsaturated fatty acids [oleic acid (C18:1) [ω-9] 40%] in proportions similar to those observed by Due et al. [22]. Once the chemical composition of RPLO was known, we investigated the pharmacological properties attributed to its major constituents.

Palmitic acid (C16:0), the main SFA of RPLO, is common in the human diet [23]. However, the excess intake of SFAs increases serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels [24], which is associated with obesity [25], diabetes [26], heart disease, and cancer [27].

UFAs have attracted the interest of researchers in the areas of skin cosmetics and food due to their numerous known benefits to human health. The intake of UFAs increases the amount of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol [28], promoting a reduction in LDL levels. Oleic acid (C18:1, ω-9, 40% of RPLO), which is abundant in olive oil used in the Mediterranean diet and RPLO, has been described to regulate immune and anti-inflammatory functions [29, 30], reduce depressive symptoms [31], and exert positive effects on the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular, autoimmune and metabolic diseases, and cancer [32]. Dietary supplementation of diabetic mice with palmitoleic acid (C16:1 [ω-7] 6.3% of RPLO) promoted a reduction in body weight, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia [33], and is an important positive modulator of glucose uptake [34]. In the study by Souza et al. [35], the intake of palmitoleic acid promoted a reduction in hepatic steatosis and the levels of inflammatory mediators and improved peripheral insulin resistance in mice, attenuating the production of hepatic glucose induced by a high-fat diet [36]. Linoleic acid (C18:2 [ω-6] 1.1% of RPLO), although it is a minor constituent of RPLO, is a precursor of important endogenous fatty acids, such as arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids, which have shown cardioprotective properties [37, 38] and may attenuate the inflammatory process involved in metabolic syndrome, as well as cell adhesion, apoptosis, and cancer [39, 40].

UFAs, such as those found in RPLO, are components of the three layers of the skin, acting as an important physical barrier [41], or in tissue repair processes after mechanical damage [42]. Fatty acid deficiency caused skin inflammation similar to atopic dermatitis in hairless mice fed a special diet [43]. Oleic acid (ω-9) is widely used in cosmetic emulsions because it possesses emollient properties, restoring the oiliness of dry and flaky skin [44]. Besides, oleic acid enhances the permeation of molecules from the stratum corneum of the epidermis towards deeper layers of this tissue without exerting toxic or irritating effects [45]. Based on these characteristics, several UFAs have been investigated as potential percutaneous carriers of drugs, such as antidepressants, anti-inflammatory agents, and treatments for Alzheimer’s disease [46, 47].

The generation of lipid mediators from linoleic acid, such as arachidonic acid and, subsequently, eicosanoids such as prostaglandins, thromboxanes, and leukotrienes, participates in the division and differentiation of epithelial tissue cells [48] and hemorrhage and hemostasis [44]. Therefore, the participation of essential fatty acids is critical for the maintenance of skin health and in repair processes favoring tissue regeneration [49]. The addition of RPLO to human fibroblast cultures increased the cell migration rate compared to the control treatment. An increased fibroblast migration rate was also observed after supplementation of the medium with a mixture of vegetable oils [50]. In addition to the positive effects on the migration rate of fibroblasts, Guidoni et al. [51] observed that a mixture of vegetable oils promoted an inflammatory response controlled by the modulation of the levels of pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6). This controlled response promoted an improvement in wound tissue healing. These results corroborate the healing properties of other oils, such as pequi and buriti oil, which stimulate the healing of experimental skin wounds in rats [52, 53].

Another beneficial property of RPLO is its antioxidant activity. Extensive exposure to ultraviolet radiation contributes to premature skin aging [54], increasing the risk of carcinogenic processes in this tissue [55]. The observed antioxidant activity of RPLO helps to reduce oxidative damage in the skin, particularly the damage responsible for photoaging. Oleic acid has been added to photoprotective and tanning emulsions due to its photoprotective properties, promoting skin regeneration and reducing the damage caused by excessive exposure to sunlight [56, 57].

In addition to the photoprotective properties, the topical application of oils decreases the trauma during dressing replacement, prevents dehydration of the wounded tissue, and functions as a barrier against microorganism invasion into the temporally unprotected tissue [58]. Based on the results of in vitro assays, RPLO does not exert antimicrobial effects on the evaluated bacteria. The absence of direct antimicrobial actions was also described for the oil extracted from the snake Spilotes pullatus (Linnaeus, 1758) [59], in contrast to the oil extracted from the Brazilian boa Boa constrictor Linnaeus, 1758, [60]. Thus, further studies of the antimicrobial properties of oils are encouraged.

The antioxidant properties of the UFAs, namely, oleic [12], linoleic [61], and stearic [12] acids, are very important both for topical application and for ingestion because oxidative damage occurs at both the tissue and systemic levels [62]. Studies examining the antioxidant activity of oils obtained from insects is scarce in the literature [6366]; however, the antioxidant activity of RPLO was similar to vegetable oils shown to be beneficial to health, such as sunflower, macadamia, linseed, and chia oils [67].

The consumption of foods considered antioxidants is recommended. However, excess intake of antioxidants may promote pro-oxidant effects [68, 69]. For this reason, we conducted toxicity studies in vitro and in vivo to investigate the possible undesirable effects of RPLO. RPLO did not alter cell viability or the survival of nematodes exposed to different oil concentrations. The C. elegans experimental model has been used to evaluate the possible toxic and pharmacological effects of several substances [70]. Although it is a simpler model than the human organism, several homologous genes and molecular pathways related to development, resistance to different stressors, reproduction, and aging are shared [71, 72]. The results of both the in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated the safety of the topical application or ingestion of RPLO by the Guarani-Kaiowá people of Mato Grosso do Sul.

Conclusions

In this study, we present the fatty acid composition of RPLO and, for the first time, describe its antioxidant and healing properties. By confirming the pharmacological properties of RPLO, we intend to share this knowledge not only with the scientific community but also with the Guarani-Kaiowá people to reinforce value to the indigenous TK and prevent this secular knowledge from being lost over time.

Supporting information

S1 File

(PDF)

S2 File

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The first author is a member of the Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous ethnic group. Authors acknowledgment to Julia Cavalheira Veron and Agostinha Vilharva Cáceres grandparents of Kellen Natalice Vilharva, representatives of all indigenous women, who shared their knowledge with their granddaughter. The authors would like to thank the government agencies that support science in Brazil: Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep) and Pró-Reitoria de Ensino de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa da UFGD (PROPP-UFGD).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Njoroge GN, Kaibui IM, Njenga PK, Odhiambo PO. Utilisation of priority traditional medicinal plants and local people’s knowledge on their conservation status in arid lands of Kenya (Mwingi District). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6: 1–8. 10.1186/1746-4269-6-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gibson J. Community Resources: Intellectual Property, International Trade and Protection of Traditional Knowledge. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Robinson DF, Abdel-Latif A, Roffe P. Protecting Traditional Knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nelson MK, Shilling D, editors. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Costa-Neto EM. Entomotherapy, or the medicinal use of insects. J Ethnobiol. 2005;25(1): 93–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vera C, Brand A. Aramanday guasu (Rhynchophorus palmarum) como alimento tradicional entre os Guarani Ñandéva na aldeia Pirajuí. Tellus. 2012;23: 97–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Delgado C, Romero R, Espinoza RV, Trigozo M, Correa R. Rhynchophorus palmarum used in traditonal medicine in the peruvian Amazon. Ethnobiol Lett. 2019;10(1): 120. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cerda H, Martínez R, Briceno N, Pizzoferrato L, Manzi P, Tommaseo Ponzetta M, et al. Palm worm: (Rhynchophorus palmarum) traditional food in Amazonas, Venezuela-nutritional composition, small scale production and tourist palatability. Ecol Food Nutr. 2001;40: 13–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cartay R, Dimitrov V, Feldman M. An insect bad for agriculture but good for human consumption: The case of Rhynchophorus palmarum: A social science perspective. In: Edible Insects, Mikkola H, editor. IntechOpen; 2020.
  • 10.Assmann KE, Adjibade M, Hercberg S, Galan P, Kesse-Guyot E. Unsaturated fatty acid intakes during midlife are positively associated with later cognitive function in older adults with modulating effects of antioxidant supplementation. J Nutr. 2018;148(12): 1938–45. 10.1093/jn/nxy206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang TH, Wang PW, Yang SC, Chou WL, Fang JY. Cosmetic and therapeutic applications of fish oil’s fatty acids on the skin. Mar Drugs. 2018;16(8): 1–20. 10.3390/md16080256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang J, Zhang Y, Fang Z, Sun L, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. Oleic acid alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative damage in rat by its radicals scavenging activity. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;190(1): 95–100. 10.1007/s12011-018-1526-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Koohikamali S, Tan CP, Ling TC. Optimization of sunflower oil transesterification process using sodium methoxide. Sci World J. 2012;2012: 1–8. 10.1100/2012/475027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gupta D, Gupta RK. Bioprotective properties of Dragon’s blood resin: In vitro evaluation of antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11(13): 1–9. 10.1186/1472-6882-11-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.CLSI. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibilities tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; Approved Standard, 11th edition. CLSI document M07-A10. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute; 2018.
  • 16.Chen Y, Lu B, Yang Q, Fearns C, John IRY, Lee JD. Combined integrin phosphoproteomic analyses and small interfering RNA-based functional screening identify key regulators for cancer cell adhesion and migration. Cancer Res. 2009;69(8): 3713–20. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1): 71–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bonamigo T, Campos JF, Alfredo TM, Balestieri JBP, Cardoso CAL, Paredes-Gamero EJ, et al. Antioxidant, cytotoxic, and toxic activities of propolis from two native bees in Brazil: Scaptotrigona depilis and Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, Piao G. The traditional medicine and modern medicine from natural products. Molecules. 2016;21(559): 1–18. 10.3390/molecules21050559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zielińska E, Karaś M, Jakubczyk A. Antioxidant activity of predigested protein obtained from a range of farmed edible insects. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2017;52(2): 306–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gao Y, Yu WX, Duan XM, Ni LL, Liu H, Zhao HR, et al. Wasp venom possesses potential therapeutic effect in experimental models of rheumatoid arthritis. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2020;2020: 1–10. 10.1155/2020/6394625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Due EA, Zabri HCBL, Kouadio JPEN, Kouame LP. Fatty acid composition and properties of skin and digestive fat content oils from Rhynchophorus palmarum L. larva. African J Biochem Res. 2009;3(4): 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.French MA, Sundram K, Clandinin MT. Cholesterolaemic effect of palmitic acid in relation to other dietary fatty acids. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11 Suppl 7:S401–7. 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s.7.3.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schwab US, Maliranta HM, Sarkkinen ES, Savolainen MJ, Kesäniemi YA, Uusitupa MIJ. Different effects of palmitic and stearic acid-enriched diets on serum lipids and lipoproteins and plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity in healthy young women. Metabolism. 1996;45(2): 143–9. 10.1016/s0026-0495(96)90044-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Korbecki J, Bajdak-Rusinek K. The effect of palmitic acid on inflammatory response in macrophages: an overview of molecular mechanisms. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(11): 915–932. 10.1007/s00011-019-01273-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cheng L, Yu Y, Szabo A, Wu Y, Wang H, Camer D, et al. Palmitic acid induces central leptin resistance and impairs hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism in male mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2015;26(5):541–548. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chei CL, Yamagishi K, Kitamura A, Kiyama M, Sankai T, Okada T, et al. Serum fatty acid and risk of coronary artery disease—Circulatory risk in communities study (CIRCS). Circ J. 2018;82(12): 3013–3020. 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lunn J, Theobald HE. The health effects of dietary unsaturated fatty acids. Nutr Bull. 2006;31(3): 178–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carrillo C, Alonso-Torre S, del M Cavia M. Role of oleic acid in immune system; mechanism of action; a review. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(4): 978–90. 10.3305/nh.2012.27.4.5783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ben-Dror K, Birk R. Oleic acid ameliorates palmitic acid-induced ER stress and inflammation markers in naive and cerulein-treated exocrine pancreas cells. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(5): 1–15. 10.1042/BSR20190054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hoffmire CA, Block RC, Thevenet-Morrison K, van Wijngaarden E. Associations between omega-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids from fish consumption and severity of depressive symptoms: an analysis of the 2005–2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2012;86(4–5): 155–160. 10.1016/j.plefa.2012.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sales-Campos H, Reis de Souza P, Crema Peghini B, Santana da Silva J, Ribeiro Cardoso C. An overview of the modulatory effects of oleic acid in health and disease. Mini-Reviews Med Chem. 2013;13(2): 201–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang ZH, Miyahara H, Hatanaka A. Chronic administration of palmitoleic acid reduces insulin resistance and hepatic lipid accumulation in KK-Ay Mice with genetic type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10: 1–8. 10.1186/1476-511X-10-120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bolsoni-Lopes A, Festuccia WT, Chimin P, Farias TS, Torres-Leal FL, Cruz MM, et al. Palmitoleic acid (n-7) increases white adipocytes GLUT4 content and glucose uptake in association with AMPK activation. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13(1): 1–10. 10.1186/1476-511X-13-199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Souza CO, Teixeira AAS, Lima EA, Batatinha HAP, Gomes LM, Carvalho-Silva M, et al. Palmitoleic acid (N-7) attenuates the immunometabolic disturbances caused by a high-fat diet independently of PPARα. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014: 582197. 10.1155/2014/582197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jandacek RJ. Linoleic Acid: A nutritional quandary. Healthc (Basel). 2017;5(2): 1–8. 10.3390/healthcare5020025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tang KS. Protective effect of arachidonic acid and linoleic acid on 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced toxicity in PC12 cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13(197): 1–8. 10.1186/1476-511X-13-197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brinton EA, Mason RP. Prescription omega-3 fatty acid products containing highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16(1): 1–13. 10.1186/s12944-016-0392-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wolfram G., 2003. Dietary fatty acids and coronary heart disease. Eur J Med Res. 2003;8, 321–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Innes JK, Calder PC. Omega-6 fatty acids and inflammation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2018;132: 41–8. 10.1016/j.plefa.2018.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van Smeden J, Janssens M, Gooris GS, Bouwstra JA. The important role of stratum corneum lipids for the cutaneous barrier function. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2013;1841(3): 295–313. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.van Smeden J, Boiten WA, Hankemeier T, Rissmann R, Bouwstra JA, Vreeken RJ. Combined LC/MS-platform for analysis of all major stratum corneum lipids, and the profiling of skin substitutes. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2013;1841(1): 70–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fujii M, Nakashima H, Tomozawa J, Shimazaki Y, Ohyanagi C, Kawaguchi N, et al. Deficiency of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids is mainly responsible for atopic dermatitis-like pruritic skin inflammation in special diet-fed hairless mice. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22(4): 272–7. 10.1111/exd.12120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vermaak I, Kamatou GPP, Komane-Mofokeng B, Viljoen AM, Beckett K. African seed oils of commercial importance—Cosmetic applications. South African J Bot. 2011;77(4): 920–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kumar L, Verma S, Kumar S, Prasad DN, Jain AK. Fatty acid vesicles acting as expanding horizon for transdermal delivery. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 2016;45(2): 251–60. 10.3109/21691401.2016.1146729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim MJ, Doh HJ, Choi MK, Chung SJ, Shim CK, Kim DD, et al. Skin permeation enhancement of diclofenac by fatty acids. Drug Deliv. 2008;15(6): 373–9. 10.1080/10717540802006898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Choi J, Choi MK, Chong S, Chung SJ, Shim CK, Kim DD. Effect of fatty acids on the transdermal delivery of donepezil: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2012;422(1–2): 83–90. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nicolaou A. Eicosanoids in skin inflammation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2013;88(1): 131–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hansen HS, Jensen B. Essential function of linoleic acid esterified in acylglucosylceramide and acylceramide in maintaining the epidermal water permeability barrier. Evidence from feeding studies with oleate, linoleate, arachidonate, columbinate and α-linolenate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Lipids Lipid Metab. 1985;834(3): 357–63. 10.1016/0005-2760(85)90009-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lania BG, Morari J, de Almeida AR, da Silva MN, Vieira-Damiani G, de Almeida Lins K, et al. Topical essential fatty acid oil on wounds: local and systemic effects. PLoS One. 2019;14(1): 1–15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guidoni M, de Christo Scherer MM, Figueira MM, Schmitt EFP, de Almeida LC, Scherer R, et al. Fatty acid composition of vegetable oil blend and in vitro effects of pharmacotherapeutical skin care applications. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(2): 1–8. 10.1590/1414-431X20188209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.de Oliveira MLM, Nunes-Pinheiro DCS, Tomé AR, Mota ÉF, Lima-Verde IA, de M Pinheiro FG, et al. In vivo topical anti-inflammatory and wound healing activities of the fixed oil of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. seeds. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;129(2): 214–9. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ferreira MOG, Sá Lima I, Ribeiro AB, Lobo AO, Rizzo MS, Osajima JA, et al. Biocompatible gels of chitosan-buriti oil for potential wound healing applications. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(8): 1–17. 10.3390/ma13081977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Krutmann J, Bouloc A, Sore G, Bernard BA, Passeron T. The skin aging exposome. J Dermatol Sci. 2017;85(3): 152–61. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rahman K. Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors. Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(2): 219–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pilkington SM, Watson REB, Nicolaou A, Rhodes LE. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: Photoprotective macronutrients. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(7): 537–43. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01294.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Badea G, Lăcătuşu I, Badea N, Ott C, Meghea A. Use of various vegetable oils in designing photoprotective nanostructured formulations for UV protection and antioxidant activity. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;67: 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hatanaka E, Curi R. Ácidos graxos e cicatrização: uma revisão. Rev Bras Farm. 2007; 88(2): 53–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Oliveira OP, Sales DL, Dias DQ, Cabral MES, Araújo Filho JA, Teles DA, et al. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of fixed oil extracted from the body fat of the snake Spilotes pullatus. Pharm Biol. 2014;52(6): 740–744. 10.3109/13880209.2013.868495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Falodun A, Owolabi OJ, Osahon O. Physicochemical, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory evaluation of fixed oil from Boa constrictor. Acta Pol Pharm—Drug Res. 2008;65(4): 477–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mbiydzenyuy NE, Ninsiima HI, Valladares MB, Pieme CA. Zinc and linoleic acid pre-treatment attenuates biochemical and histological changes in the midbrain of rats with rotenone-induced Parkinsonism. BMC Neurosci. 2018;19(1): 1–11. 10.1186/s12868-018-0401-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang ZJ, Liang CL, Li GM, Yu CY, Yin M. Stearic acid protects primary cultured cortical neurons against oxidative stress. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007;28(3): 315–326. 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00512.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ekpo KE, Onigbinde AO, Asia IO. Pharmaceutical potentials of the oils of some popular insects consumed in southern Nigeria. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2009;3(2): 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Oonincx DGAB, van Broekhoven S, van Huis A, van Loon JJA. Feed conversion, survival and development, and composition of four insect species on diets composed of food by-products. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(10): 1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sosa DAT, Fogliano V. Potential of insect-derived ingredients for food applications. In: Insect Physiology and Ecology, Shields VDC, editor; 2017. p. 215–232.
  • 66.Marusich E, Mohamed H, Afanasev Y, Leonov S. Fatty acids from Hermetia illucens larvae fat inhibit the proliferation and growth of actual phytopathogens. Microorganisms. 2020:8(9): 1423. 10.3390/microorganisms8091423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lasch J, Schönfelder U, Walke M, Zellmer S, Beckert D. Oxidative damage of human skin lipids. Dependence of lipid peroxidation on sterol concentration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Lipids Lipid Metab. 1997;1349(2): 171–81. 10.1016/s0005-2760(97)00093-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pilkington SM, Rhodes LE, Al-Aasswad NMI, Massey KA, Nicolaou A. Impact of EPA ingestion on COX- and LOX-mediated eicosanoid synthesis in skin with and without a pro-inflammatory UVR challenge—Report of a randomised controlled study in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58(3): 580–90. 10.1002/mnfr.201300405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Widmer RJ, Flammer AJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. The Mediterranean diet, its components, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Med. 2015;128(3): 229–238. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kontush A, Finckh B, Karten B, Kohlschütter A, Beisiegel U. Antioxidant and prooxidant activity of alpha-tocopherol in human plasma and low density lipoprotein. J Lipid Res. 1996;37(7): 1436–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Navarro-Herrera D, Aranaz P, Eder-Azanza L, Zabala M, Romo-Hualde A, Hurtado C, et al. Borago officinalis seed oil (BSO), a natural source of omega-6 fatty acids, attenuates fat accumulation by activating peroxisomal beta-oxidation both in C. elegans and in diet-induced obese rats. Food Funct. 2018;9(8): 4340–51. 10.1039/c8fo00423d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Harris TW, Arnaboldi V, Cain S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Cho J, et al. WormBase: a modern Model Organism Information Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(D1): D762–D767. 10.1093/nar/gkz920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Branislav T Šiler

31 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-36667

Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. de Picoli Souza,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The authors are advised to carefully revise the statistical processing of the data, as described by Reviewer #1. The whole text should be meticulously checked for correct language usage and typograpgic errors. Reviewer #1 has required several additional clarifications, mostly related to the methodology used.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 12 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This work was supported by grants from

 Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato

Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

(CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq),

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep) and Pró-Reitoria de Ensino de Pós-Graduação e

Pesquisa da UFGD (PROPP-UFGD)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that Figure 2 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

4.1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

4.2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript (PONE-D-20-36667) entitled "Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities" is about the therapeutic use of oils obtained from R. palmarum larvae. The authors determined the chemical characteristics of the obtained oil, and, for the first time, are described its antioxidant and healing properties. They paid a special attention to the Guarani-Kaiowá ethnic community and their knowledge of zootherapy. Submitted manuscript contains some valuable information, so, this interesting research deserves attention having in mind a possibility of vanishing of traditional knowledge and practices over time. Also, the presented results may be of some help in the future development of various pharmaceutical products.

Unfortunately, I cannot recommend accepting the manuscript in its present form.

Following are some comments and questions raised during the review of the text.

Significant revision of English scientific writing is needed.

ABSTRACT

Abstract is concise and contains factual information.

INTRODUCTION

In the Introduction, the authors stated the objectives of their work that are supported by appropriate facts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiments are well designed and performed. But, some parts of Material and Methods section need a bit more details. Specifically, these issues are highlighted:

Obtaining R. palmarum larvae oil

In Supplementary material S1, the method of collecting larvae is already described in detail.

Line 93-94 The authors mentioned that the larvae were collected in Takuara village.

When this procedure was conducted? How many larvae were collected?

Line 98 “...larvae were washed with distilled water, dried with paper towels, weighed, and frozen...“

What were the temperatures that larvae were kept on, until the beginning of the experimental procedure?

Determination of the chemical composition of RPLO

Line 124 “...followed by stirring and incubation of the mixture“

The time of incubation?

Antioxidant activity of RPLO

In formula for DPPH percentage, Abs sample is the absorbance of the sample and Abs control is the absorbance of control? Please, provide clarifications.

Line 149-150 “The results of three experiments performed in triplicate were used to determine the antioxidant activity.“

How many samples were in each experiment?

Antimicrobial activity of RPLO

Line 176 “The experiments were carried out in triplicate. “

How many samples were in each of this triplicates?

Cell culture, viability, and migration

Please, provide clarifications for Abs treated cells and Abs control cells.

Statistical analysis

Parametric statistics should be used when the assumptions of the models (ANOVA) can be reasonably met. A test of homogeneity of variances (for example, Levene test for homogeneity of variances) must show that in all cases variances were not significantly heterogeneous, as well as a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normal distribution fitting. So, the authors should test data distribution by, for example, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and point it out in Statistical analysis section. This is very important because normal distribution is prerequisite for using ANOVA test.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial activity of the RPLO

Please, see the Table 3. Did you mean MIC and MBC, instead of CIM and MBC?

Effect of RPLO on the viability of MRC-5 cells

Maybe, it would be better to rephrase this section. E.g., at given concentrations, cell viability was in what range? Compare to the control, which concentration of RPLO the most changes the viability of MRC-5 cells?

In legend of Fig 4, please mention the number of samples. n= 9?

Effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells

Line 299 "As shown in Fig 5A…" instead of "As shown in Fig 5…"

Line 302-304 Please, rephrase the sentence. Maybe, something like the following: The cell migration rate was statistically increased by 60% in the wells treated with RPLO compared to the wells receiving the control treatment (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5. Legend should be rewritten. It should be as clear and concise as possible. In addition, please mention the number of samples. Was it 9?

Toxicity of RPLO in a C. elegans model

In legend of Fig 6, please mention the number of samples. n= 10?

DISCUSSION

Please improve this section. The discussion should be clearly and concisely presented. Namely, the same things are repeated in several paragraphs – e.g. see lines 369-371 and 388-391; lines 402-408 and 418-425…

REFERENCES

Please, check this section once again.

Reviewer #2: COMMENTS FOR AUTHORS

Congratulations to a very interesting work. This big effort will certainly influence others to follow. It will be an important reference.

The results and conclusions obtained in this study constitute a clear evidence of the need to conserve and promote the medicinal uses of insects (and animals in general) derived from a deep traditional knowledge.

The paper should definitely be published, but it needs a minor revision. Below you will find a series of specific comments and suggestions, and I have just found some typographical errors, typos that I expose.

Title

Page 10 / line 1… Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera:...

Abstract

Page 11 / line 24… Brazil. This human community use the…

Page 11 / line 25… snout beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) to...

Page 11 / line 32… against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that…

Introduction

Page 12 / line 24… Traditional knowledge… the authors mention (they write) this concept numerous times. I think it is possible to use the abbreviation TK from this point on.

Page 12 / line 24… species for their benefit (1). At this point it is possible to include more general and important references; for example:

• Gibson, J. 2016. Community Resources: Intellectual Property, International Trade and Protection of Traditional Knowledge. Routledge, London.

• Robinson, D.F., A. Abdel-Latif, and P. Roffe (eds.) 2017. Protecting Traditional Knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Routledge, London.

• Nelson, M.K., and D. Shilling (eds.) 2018. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Page 12 / line 57… the beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera:...

Page 12 / line 60… from the integument of R. palmarum larvae is… (not carcass).

Page 12 / line 61… and skin infections (3). At this point it is possible to include more references; for example:

• Cerda, H., R. Martínez, N. Briceno, L. Pizzoferrato, P. Manzi, M. Tommaseo Ponzetta, O. Marín, and M.G. Paoletti, 2001. Palm worm: (Rhynchophorus palmarum) traditional food in Amazonas, Venezuela-nutritional composition, small scale production and tourist palatability. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 40: 13-32.

• Cartay, R., V. Dimitrov, and M. Feldman, 2020. An insect bad for agriculture but good for human consumption: The case of Rhynchophorus palmarum: A social science perspective. In: Edible Insects, (Mikkola, H., ed.). IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87165. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/edible-insects/an-insect-bad-for-agriculture-but-good-for-human-consumption-the-case-of-em-rhynchophorus-palmarum-e

I even think that it is appropriate to bring reference number 16 to this point (Delgado et al. 2019).

Materials and Methods

Page 14 / line 115… at the bottom of Figure 3 appears, in parentheses, the word "arrow" in relation to image C. In this photograph I do not see the arrow.

Page 15… references number 8 (line 120) and 9 (line 141) appear before number 7, which is on page 16 (line 154). Correct this.

Page 15 / line 121… São Paulo

Page 15 / line 140… described by Gupta and Gupta in 2011,…

Page 16 / line 157… São Paulo

Page 17 / line 178… São Paulo

Results

Page 22 / line 272… against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria...

Page 23 / Table 3… the abbreviations MIC and MBC are included in the title of the table… Why do the abbreviations “CIM” and “CBM” appear in the body of the table? Correct this.

Discussion

Page 26 / line 346… isolated from insects is…

Page 26 / lines 347 and 348… change the order of the references: (3) (16), instead of (16) (3).

Page 26 / line 355… with obesity (20), diabetes (21),… enter spaces.

Page 27 / line 362… functions (24-25),… enter a space.

Page 27 / line 366… study by Souza et al. (30), the intake… placed here, this reference is better, at this point (not at the end of the sentence).

Page 28 / line 401… in rats (47-48). … enter a space.

Page 28 / line 408… to sunlight (51-52). … enter a space.

Page 29 / line 414… extracted from the colubrid snake Spilotes pullatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (54),…

Page 29 / line 415… extracted from Boa constrictor Linnaeus, 1758, which…

Page 29 / line 419… for ingestion…

Page 29 / lines 422 and 423… Studies examining the antioxidant activity of oils obtained from insects are scarce in the literature (XXXX);… At this point in the “Discussion” section, I believe that the inclusion of some references is very convenient. I provide you with some examples:

• Ekpo, K.E., A.O. Onigbinde, and I.O. Asia, 2009. Pharmaceutical potentials of the oils of some popular insects consumed in southern Nigeria. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 3(2): 51-57.

• Oonincx, D.G.A.B., S. van Broekhoven, A. van Huis, and J.J.A. van Loon, 2015. Feed conversion, survival and development, and composition of four insect species on diets composed of food by-products. PLoS One, 10(12): e0144601.

• Sosa, D.A.T., and V. Fogliano, 2017. Potential of Insect-Derived Ingredients for Food Applications. In: Insect Physiology and Ecology (Shields, V.D.C., ed.), pp. 215-232. IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/67318

• Marusich, E., H. Mohamed, Y. Afanasev, and S. Leonov, 2020. Fatty acids from Hermetia illucens larvae fat inhibit the proliferation and growth of actual phytopathogens. Microorganisms 8(9): 1423.

Page 29 / line 431… conducted by Guidoni et al. (46), who… This is not reference number 42. Correct this.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: José Antonio González

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Revision_PONE-D-20-36667.doc

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0249919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249919.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Feb 2021

Dear editor,

We are very grateful for the comments raised during the review process. We would like to make it clear that all suggestions have been analyzed and the manuscript has been modified. The responses to each survey were entered as "> response". In the responses, the indicated lines correspond to the file "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted".

The manuscript (PONE-D-20-36667) entitled "Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities" is about the therapeutic use of oils obtained from R. palmarum larvae. The authors determined the chemical characteristics of the obtained oil, and, for the first time, are described its antioxidant and healing properties. They paid a special attention to the Guarani-Kaiowá ethnic community and their knowledge of zootherapy. Submitted manuscript contains some valuable information, so, this interesting research deserves attention having in mind a possibility of vanishing of traditional knowledge and practices over time. Also, the presented results may be of some help in the future development of various pharmaceutical products.

Unfortunately, I cannot recommend accepting the manuscript in its present form.

Following are some comments and questions raised during the review of the text.

Significant revision of English scientific writing is needed.

ABSTRACT

Abstract is concise and contains factual information.

INTRODUCTION

In the Introduction, the authors stated the objectives of their work that are supported by appropriate facts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiments are well designed and performed. But, some parts of Material and Methods section need a bit more details. Specifically, these issues are highlighted:

Obtaining R. palmarum larvae oil

In Supplementary material S1, the method of collecting larvae is already described in detail.

Line 93-94 The authors mentioned that the larvae were collected in Takuara village.

When this procedure was conducted? How many larvae were collected?

Line 98 “...larvae were washed with distilled water, dried with paper towels, weighed, and frozen...“

What were the temperatures that larvae were kept on, until the beginning of the experimental procedure?

> In this version of the manuscript we added further information regard the process of oil obtainment, informing the number of larvae, temperature of storage and further details requested (line 98-99).

Determination of the chemical composition of RPLO

Line 124 “...followed by stirring and incubation of the mixture“

The time of incubation?

> We inserted in this version of the manuscript the time of incubation, of 15 min (line 125).

Antioxidant activity of RPLO

In formula for DPPH percentage, Abs sample is the absorbance of the sample and Abs control is the absorbance of control? Please, provide clarifications.

> We appreciate this observation and now, we included more information about the formula (line 148).

Line 149-150 “The results of three experiments performed in triplicate were used to determine the antioxidant activity.“

How many samples were in each experiment?

> This was another important observation raised by referee. We included more details about this topic, informing that three independent assays. In each assay, we used triplicates for each oil concentration (n=3). Thus, each assay was carried out with n= 3. The sum of three independent assays resulted in a total samples of n= 9 (line 152-153).

Antimicrobial activity of RPLO

Line 176 “The experiments were carried out in triplicate. “

How many samples were in each of this triplicates?

> In each assay, we used triplicates for each oil concentration (n=3). Thus, each assay was carried out with n= 3. The sum of three independent assays resulted in a total samples of n= 9 (3 assays using a 3 samples) (line 180).

Cell culture, viability, and migration

Please, provide clarifications for Abs treated cells and Abs control cells.

> We appreciate this observation and now, we included more information about the formula (line 206).

Statistical analysis

Parametric statistics should be used when the assumptions of the models (ANOVA) can be reasonably met. A test of homogeneity of variances (for example, Levene test for homogeneity of variances) must show that in all cases variances were not significantly heterogeneous, as well as a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normal distribution fitting. So, the authors should test data distribution by, for example, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and point it out in Statistical analysis section. This is very important because normal distribution is prerequisite for using ANOVA test.

> We thank the referee regards this so important observation. In this version of the manuscript, we carried out further statistics analyses, such as suggested. So, we included the test of homogeneity of variances (Levene) and for normal distribution (KS test). Since non-significant values were obtained, we continued using ANOVA (line 242-244).

RESULTS

Antimicrobial activity of the RPLO

Please, see the Table 3. Did you mean MIC and MBC, instead of CIM and MBC?

> These mistakes were corrected.

Effect of RPLO on the viability of MRC-5 cells

Maybe, it would be better to rephrase this section. E.g., at given concentrations, cell viability was in what range? Compare to the control, which concentration of RPLO the most changes the viability of MRC-5 cells?

> This section was rewritten to improve the clarity (line 294-298).

In legend of Fig 4, please mention the number of samples. n= 9?

> The mention regards the n=9 was included (line 302).

Effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells

Line 299 "As shown in Fig 5A…" instead of "As shown in Fig 5…"

Line 302-304 Please, rephrase the sentence. Maybe, something like the following: The cell migration rate was statistically increased by 60% in the wells treated with RPLO compared to the wells receiving the control treatment (Fig. 5B).

> Based in observation of referee, we modified the section, improving the clarity of suggested sentences (line 306-310).

Figure 5. Legend should be rewritten. It should be as clear and concise as possible. In addition, please mention the number of samples. Was it 9?

> Actually, the legend contained excessive sentences. This mistake was corrected and the number of samples was included in this version (line 314-322).

Toxicity of RPLO in a C. elegans model

In legend of Fig 6, please mention the number of samples. n= 10?

> This was a good observation. This assay contains a n= 90, formed by triplicates containing 10 worms/well (n= 30). Once the assay was carried out three times independently, the number of 90 was obtained (line 332).

DISCUSSION

Please improve this section. The discussion should be clearly and concisely presented. Namely, the same things are repeated in several paragraphs – e.g. see lines 369-371 and 388-391; lines 402-408 and 418-425…

> We included modifications in discussion topic in order to make more conscious. However, in some points different approaches were necessary. So, whenever possible we improved the section.

REFERENCES

Please, check this section once again.

> We made corrections in references section.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 1

Branislav T Šiler

19 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-36667R1

Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. de Picoli Souza,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The authors have revised the manuscript according to the Reviewer #1' report only. The revision based on the reports of both Reviewers are needed. In addition, Response to reviewers should be better structured and authors' reposes have to be provided to each point raised by the Reviewers, instead of being provided for some of them. Cover letter needs to be updated.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 05 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0249919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249919.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


9 Mar 2021

Dear editor,

We are very grateful for the comments raised during the review process. We would like to make it clear that all suggestions have been analyzed and the manuscript has been modified. The responses to each survey were entered as ‘> response’.

Reviewer #1: COMMENTS FOR AUTHORS

The manuscript (PONE-D-20-36667) entitled "Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities" is about the therapeutic use of oils obtained from R. palmarum larvae. The authors determined the chemical characteristics of the obtained oil, and, for the first time, are described its antioxidant and healing properties. They paid a special attention to the Guarani-Kaiowá ethnic community and their knowledge of zootherapy. Submitted manuscript contains some valuable information, so, this interesting research deserves attention having in mind a possibility of vanishing of traditional knowledge and practices over time. Also, the presented results may be of some help in the future development of various pharmaceutical products.

Unfortunately, I cannot recommend accepting the manuscript in its present form.

Following are some comments and questions raised during the review of the text.

Significant revision of English scientific writing is needed.

ABSTRACT

Abstract is concise and contains factual information.

INTRODUCTION

In the Introduction, the authors stated the objectives of their work that are supported by appropriate facts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiments are well designed and performed. But, some parts of Material and Methods section need a bit more details. Specifically, these issues are highlighted:

Obtaining R. palmarum larvae oil

In Supplementary material S1, the method of collecting larvae is already described in detail.

Line 93-94 The authors mentioned that the larvae were collected in Takuara village.

When this procedure was conducted? How many larvae were collected?

Line 98 “...larvae were washed with distilled water, dried with paper towels, weighed, and frozen...“

What were the temperatures that larvae were kept on, until the beginning of the experimental procedure?

> In this version of the manuscript we added further information regard the process of oil obtainment, informing the number of larvae, temperature of storage and further details requested.

Determination of the chemical composition of RPLO

Line 124 “...followed by stirring and incubation of the mixture“

The time of incubation?

> We inserted in this version of the manuscript the time of incubation (15 min).

Antioxidant activity of RPLO

In formula for DPPH percentage, Abs sample is the absorbance of the sample and Abs control is the absorbance of control? Please, provide clarifications.

> We appreciate this observation and now, we included more information about the formula.

Line 149-150 “The results of three experiments performed in triplicate were used to determine the antioxidant activity.“

How many samples were in each experiment?

> This was another important observation raised by referee. We included more details about this topic, informing that three independent assays. In each assay, we used triplicates for each oil concentration (n=3). Thus, each assay was carried out with n= 3. The sum of three independent assays resulted in a total samples of n= 9.

Antimicrobial activity of RPLO

Line 176 “The experiments were carried out in triplicate. “

How many samples were in each of this triplicates?

> In each assay, we used triplicates for each oil concentration (n=3). Thus, each assay was carried out with n= 3. The sum of three independent assays resulted in a total samples of n= 9 (3 assays using a 3 samples)

Cell culture, viability, and migration

Please, provide clarifications for Abs treated cells and Abs control cells.

> We appreciate this observation and now, we included more information about the formula.

Statistical analysis

Parametric statistics should be used when the assumptions of the models (ANOVA) can be reasonably met. A test of homogeneity of variances (for example, Levene test for homogeneity of variances) must show that in all cases variances were not significantly heterogeneous, as well as a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normal distribution fitting. So, the authors should test data distribution by, for example, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and point it out in Statistical analysis section. This is very important because normal distribution is prerequisite for using ANOVA test.

> We thank the referee regards this so important observation. In this version of the manuscript, we carried out further statistics analyses, such as suggested. So, we included the test of homogeneity of variances (Levene) and for normal distribution (KS test). Since non-significant values were obtained, we continued using ANOVA.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial activity of the RPLO

Please, see the Table 3. Did you mean MIC and MBC, instead of CIM and MBC?

> These mistakes were corrected.

Effect of RPLO on the viability of MRC-5 cells

Maybe, it would be better to rephrase this section. E.g., at given concentrations, cell viability was in what range? Compare to the control, which concentration of RPLO the most changes the viability of MRC-5 cells?

> This section was rewritten to improve the clarity.

In legend of Fig 4, please mention the number of samples. n= 9?

> The mention regards the n=9 was included.

Effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells

Line 299 "As shown in Fig 5A…" instead of "As shown in Fig 5…"

Line 302-304 Please, rephrase the sentence. Maybe, something like the following: The cell migration rate was statistically increased by 60% in the wells treated with RPLO compared to the wells receiving the control treatment (Fig. 5B).

> Based in observation of referee, we modified the section, improving the clarity of suggested sentences.

Figure 5. Legend should be rewritten. It should be as clear and concise as possible. In addition,

please mention the number of samples. Was it 9?

> Actually, the legend contained excessive sentences. This mistake was corrected, and the number of samples was included in this version.

Toxicity of RPLO in a C. elegans model

In legend of Fig 6, please mention the number of samples. n= 10?

> This was a good comment. This assay contains a n= 90, formed by triplicates containing 10 worms/well (n= 30). Once the assay was carried out three times independently, the number of 90 was obtained.

DISCUSSION

Please improve this section. The discussion should be clearly and concisely presented. Namely, the same things are repeated in several paragraphs – e.g. see lines 369-371 and 388-391; lines 402-408 and 418-425…

> We included modifications in discussion topic in order to make more conscious. However, in some points different approaches were necessary. So, whenever possible we improved the section.

REFERENCES

Please, check this section once again.

> We made corrections and addition of further references in this version.

Reviewer #2: COMMENTS FOR AUTHORS

Congratulations to a very interesting work. This big effort will certainly influence others to follow. It will be an important reference. The results and conclusions obtained in this study constitute a clear evidence of the need to conserve and promote the medicinal uses of insects (and animals in general) derived from a deep traditional knowledge. The paper should definitely be published, but it needs a minor revision. Below you will find a series of specific comments and suggestions, and I have just found some typographical errors, typos that I expose.

Title

Page 10 / line 1… Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera:...

> We included in this version the correct taxonomic mention to C. Linnaeus, 1758.

Abstract

Page 11 / line 24… Brazil. This human community use the…

Page 11 / line 25… snout beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) to...

Page 11 / line 32… against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that…

> Regards the three mentions, we would like to keep the first one (line 24), since the first author of the manuscript is an indigenous researcher woman. For this reason, the expression ‘my people’ was considered pertinent. The changes in lines 25 and 32 were carried out.

Introduction

Page 12 / line 24… Traditional knowledge… the authors mention (they write) this concept numerous times. I think it is possible to use the abbreviation TK from this point on.

> We appreciate the important observation. Along the manuscript we used the abbreviation TK replacing the expression Traditional knowledge.

Page 12 / line 24… species for their benefit (1). At this point it is possible to include more general and important references; for example:

• Gibson, J. 2016. Community Resources: Intellectual Property, International Trade and Protection of Traditional Knowledge. Routledge, London.

• Robinson, D.F., A. Abdel-Latif, and P. Roffe (eds.) 2017. Protecting Traditional Knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Routledge, London.

• Nelson, M.K., and D. Shilling (eds.) 2018. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

> In this version of the manuscript these important references were included to improve the sources of information regards Traditional Knowledge (TK).

Page 12 / line 57… the beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera:...

Page 12 / line 60… from the integument of R. palmarum larvae is… (not carcass).

Page 12 / line 61… and skin infections (3). At this point it is possible to include more references; for example:

• Cerda, H., R. Martínez, N. Briceno, L. Pizzoferrato, P. Manzi, M. Tommaseo Ponzetta, O. Marín, and M.G. Paoletti, 2001. Palm worm: (Rhynchophorus palmarum) traditional food in Amazonas, Venezuela-nutritional composition, small scale production and tourist palatability. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 40: 13-32.

• Cartay, R., V. Dimitrov, and M. Feldman, 2020. An insect bad for agriculture but good for human consumption: The case of Rhynchophorus palmarum: A social science perspective. In: Edible Insects, (Mikkola, H., ed.). IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87165. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/edible-insects/an-insect-bad-for-agriculture-but-good-for-human-consumption-the-case-of-em-rhynchophorus-palmarum-e

I even think that it is appropriate to bring reference number 16 to this point (Delgado et al. 2019).

> We also appreciate the suggestions in order to improve the final quality of introduction section, including additional references suggested.

Materials and Methods

Page 14 / line 115… at the bottom of Figure 3 appears, in parentheses, the word "arrow" in relation to image C. In this photograph I do not see the arrow.

Page 15… references number 8 (line 120) and 9 (line 141) appear before number 7, which is on page 16 (line 154). Correct this.

Page 15 / line 121… São Paulo

Page 15 / line 140… described by Gupta and Gupta in 2011,…

Page 16 / line 157… São Paulo

Page 17 / line 178… São Paulo

> In this version, the Figure 3 mentioned before is Figure 2, since the map image was removed. The legend was corrected, as well the further points raised in lines 121, 140, 157, and 178.

Results

Page 22 / line 272… against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria...

Page 23 / Table 3… the abbreviations MIC and MBC are included in the title of the table… Why do the abbreviations “CIM” and “CBM” appear in the body of the table? Correct this.

> The changes suggested by reviewer were accepted and the corrections in abbreviations CIM and CBM by MIC and MBC.

Discussion

Page 26 / line 346… isolated from insects is…

Page 26 / lines 347 and 348… change the order of the references: (3) (16), instead of (16) (3).

Page 26 / line 355… with obesity (20), diabetes (21),… enter spaces.

Page 27 / line 362… functions (24-25),… enter a space.

Page 27 / line 366… study by Souza et al. (30), the intake… placed here, this reference is better, at this point (not at the end of the sentence).

Page 28 / line 401… in rats (47-48). … enter a space.

Page 28 / line 408… to sunlight (51-52). … enter a space.

Page 29 / line 414… extracted from the colubrid snake Spilotes pullatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (54),…

Page 29 / line 415… extracted from Boa constrictor Linnaeus, 1758, which…

Page 29 / line 419… for ingestion…

> All these observations are pertinent, for this reason the mentioned lines were changed according referee’s suggestions.

Page 29 / lines 422 and 423… Studies examining the antioxidant activity of oils obtained from insects are scarce in the literature (XXXX);… At this point in the “Discussion” section, I believe that the inclusion of some references is very convenient. I provide you with some examples:

• Ekpo, K.E., A.O. Onigbinde, and I.O. Asia, 2009. Pharmaceutical potentials of the oils of some popular insects consumed in southern Nigeria. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 3(2): 51-57.

• Oonincx, D.G.A.B., S. van Broekhoven, A. van Huis, and J.J.A. van Loon, 2015. Feed conversion, survival and development, and composition of four insect species on diets composed of food by-products. PLoS One, 10(12): e0144601.

• Sosa, D.A.T., and V. Fogliano, 2017. Potential of Insect-Derived Ingredients for Food Applications. In: Insect Physiology and Ecology (Shields, V.D.C., ed.), pp. 215-232. IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/67318

• Marusich, E., H. Mohamed, Y. Afanasev, and S. Leonov, 2020. Fatty acids from Hermetia illucens larvae fat inhibit the proliferation and growth of actual phytopathogens. Microorganisms 8(9): 1423.

Page 29 / line 431… conducted by Guidoni et al. (46), who… This is not reference number 42. Correct this.

> In this version we fixed this mistake.

Decision Letter 2

Branislav T Šiler

18 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-36667R2

Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. de Picoli Souza,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Some additional work on statistical processing is needed as stated in the Reviewer's #2 report (provided in the attachment). Figure captions also need the authors' attention. Please put references in the text into square brackets.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 02 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: I want to express my congratulations to the authors for the effort made to review and complete the article. The final version is truly satisfying. My recommendation is that it can be definitely published in the journal PLOS ONE.

Best regards and stay healthy.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: José Antonio González

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-36667R2_R2.doc

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0249919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249919.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


25 Mar 2021

The manuscript PONE-D-20-36667R2 entitled “Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities” was reviewed and the authors have addressed all the issues that reviewers had raised. I suggest that the manuscript should be accepted after an additional minor revision.

We would like to thank Dr. José Antonio González for taking care of the smallest details that will certainly enrich our manuscript. Below are the responses to the surveys, which are marked in blue.

Minor comment:

The Material and Methods section has been greatly improved. But, Statistical analysis description could be a bit more precise, something like this:

The data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Prior to the statistical analysis, Levene´s test of homogeneity of variances was used to assume that variances are equal across groups or samples and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the data. The mean values of the cell migration rate were analyzed by One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's post-test. In in vivo assays, a t-test was used to determine differences between groups. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software. The results were considered to be statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

> We appreciate the suggestion, in this version the manuscript the section Statistical analysis was rewritten observing the improvement of clarity.

Also, Figure legends would be rewritten, e.g.

Fig 3. Viability of MRC-5 cells incubated with different concentrations of RPLO for 24 h. The graph shows the means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n= 9). The observed changes were not statistically significant (t-test).

Fig 4. The effect of RPLO on the migration rate of MRC-5 cells. (A) Representative image from assay. The wound areas were determined at 0 h and after 24 h of incubation. Control cells were incubated with culture media. Cells incubated with 0.5% of oil were named RPLO. Scale bar is 1 mm. (B) The graph shows the means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n= 9). An asterisk (*) indicate statistically significant differences between mean values (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett's post-test, p <0.05).

Fig 5. Acute toxicity of RPLO in the C. elegans experimental model in vivo. Viability was recorded at (A) 24 h and (B) 48 h of treatment. The graph shows the means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n= 90). The observed changes were not statistically significant (t-test).

> The same care regards the previous appointment was took in consideration, in order to become the Figure legends clear.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 3

Branislav T Šiler

29 Mar 2021

Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities

PONE-D-20-36667R3

Dear Dr. de Picoli Souza,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Branislav T Šiler

6 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-36667R3

Rhynchophorus palmarum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Guarani-Kaiowá indigenous knowledge and pharmacological activities

Dear Dr. de Picoli Souza:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Branislav T. Šiler

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (PDF)

    S2 File

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Revision_PONE-D-20-36667.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-36667R2_R2.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES