Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0249971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249971

Transition to adult care: Exploring factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young people in adolescent ART clinics in Uganda

Scovia Nalugo Mbalinda 1,*, Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka 2, Derrick Amooti Lusota 1, Philippa Musoke 2, Mathew Nyashanu 1,¤, Dan Kabonge Kaye 3
Editor: Claudia Marotta4
PMCID: PMC8084193  PMID: 33914770

Abstract

Background

Transition readiness refers to a client who knows about his/her illness and oriented towards future goals and hopes, shows skills needed to negotiate healthcare, and can assume responsibility for his/ her treatment, and participate in decision-making that ensures uninterrupted care during and after the care transition to adult HIV care. There is a paucity of research on effective transition strategies. This study explored factors associated with adolescent readiness for the transition into adult care in Uganda.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 786 adolescents, and young people living with HIV randomly selected from 9 antiretroviral therapy clinics, utilizing a structured questionnaire. The readiness level was determined using a pre-existing scale from the Ministry of Health, and adolescents were categorized as ready or not ready for the transition. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results

A total of 786 adolescents were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 17.48 years (SD = 4). The majority of the participants, 484 (61.6%), were females. Most of the participants, 363 (46.2%), had no education. The majority of the participants, 549 (69.8%), were on first-line treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that readiness to transition into adult care remained significantly associated with having acquired a tertiary education (AOR 4.535, 95% CI 1.243–16.546, P = 0.022), trusting peer educators for HIV treatment (AOR 16.222, 95% CI 1.835–143.412, P = 0.012), having received counselling on transition to adult services (AOR 2.349, 95% CI 1.004–5.495, P = 0.049), having visited an adult clinic to prepare for transition (AOR 6.616, 95% CI 2.435–17.987, P = < 0.001) and being satisfied with the transition process in general (AOR 0.213, 95% CI 0.069–0.658, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

The perceived readiness to transition care among young adults was low. A series of individual, social and health system and services factors may determine successful transition readiness among adolescents in Uganda. Transition readiness may be enhanced by strengthening the implementation of age-appropriate and individualized case management transition at all sites while creating supportive family, peer, and healthcare environments.

Introduction

Perinatally or behaviorally, HIV-infected adolescents (10–19 years) and young adults (20–24 years) are an increasing proportion of the HIV-infected population in Uganda [1]. Globally, 1.8 million adolescents (10–19 years) live with HIV, and 85% of them live in sub-Saharan Africa. In Uganda [2]. In Uganda, 110,000 adolescents are living with HIV [3]. An increasing number of adolescents and young adults with HIV who require the transfer of care from pediatric to adult providers [4]; yet, globally, many young people experience barriers (e.g., infrastructure, staff training) that complicate this process. Transitioning from pediatric to adult HIV care has to progressively empower and increase the responsibility of HIV-infected adolescents and young people living with HIV (YPLHIV) to take charge of their health. A poor transition put the patients at risk of several challenges, including loss of continuity of care and stigma, both of which could lead to decreased adherence to care in general and ART in particular, with increased risk of HIV drug resistance and lowered immunity (and therefore morbidity from opportunistic infections) and risk of HIV transmission especially as the adolescents become sexually active. Such a transition nurtures adolescents’ (and youth’s) confidence, autonomy, and responsibility for their HIV care.

Transition readiness refers to the following client characteristics: 1) Client knows about his/her illness and oriented towards future goals and hopes, including long-term survival. 2) Client has the skills needed to negotiate appointments and multiple providers in an adult practice setting. 3) Client has personal and medical independence and can assume responsibility for his/ her treatment and participate in decision-making. 4) Client is active and has been receiving uninterrupted care. 5) Client’s basic and psychosocial needs, such as housing, employment, education, home-based services, or transportation, have also been addressed. 6) Client is familiar with the new providers and setting and has participated in discussions of the transition plan for themselves [14]. With more HIV-infected children and adolescents surviving into adulthood, these young patients’ transition into adult care should be a top priority for health services [5]. For adolescents living with HIV, the transition should be a purposeful, planned movement from paediatric, child-centered, or specialized adolescent services to adult-oriented services. It is an important factor in the long-term health and well-being of an adolescent [5]. Recent advances in adolescent and young adult health care provide opportunities to optimize HIV prevention and care research outcomes [6, 7].

The Ministry of Health (Uganda) has recognized the importance of the HIV care transition. There is a standard protocol from the Ministry of Health to guide the transition; however, the extent to which it is used is unknown, and there are only limited data on successful transition for Ugandan YPLHIV. A national survey of adolescent HIV services identified only one transition clinic at a National Referral Hospital and not readily accessible to 95% of the population living outside of Kampala [810]. Further, those at the highest risk for health complications and transmission of HIV to others (males, those living further away from health facilities) are among the least likely to have resources to support a successful transition [1113].

The Ministry of Health has created an 8-page manual for adolescent HIV treatment and support for HIV providers to highlight the transition process’s importance [14]. This document provides four key messages for transition: Develop a transition plan several years before the transition and update it at regular intervals, Ensure that HIV+ adolescents understand their chronic illness and its management; provide skills to negotiate adults clinic settings, Assess adolescents in an individualized manner for skills development and understanding of successful transition and Address barriers for each patient that may prevent skills acquisition (e.g., developmental delays, anxiety, PTSD) and advises providers to develop a transition plan and then implement that plan with no specific guidance on how to do so effectively. However, the extent of the implementation of these guidelines is not known. In this period, the provision of HIV care is a continuum, where some adolescents attend HIV care in adult clinics. At the same time, some young people still seek HIV care in adolescent clinics, potentially affecting the quality of care received. There need to assess HIV care transition readiness for the population of adolescents and young people. Given the low-resource context, it is important to assess the factors associated with readiness to transition to adult clinics. This information generated may inform the development of policies, programs, and practices to improve the transition process. This process should start early and is planned and managed carefully, with good communication between caregivers, health providers, and the adolescent, and involving the adolescent in all the decisions taken around their ongoing care.

Methods

Study design and setting

This was a cross-sectional study of PHIV adolescents and young people in antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics in four Uganda regions (Eastern, Western, and Northern). Data were collected from August 1, 2019, to January 30, 2020.

Study population

Adolescents and young people living with HIV were selected from adolescent ART clinics through a consecutive sampling procedure. At each site, a research assistant recruited all the available participants in the ART clinic and enrolled those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (Not ill, above ten years), and gave informed consent/assent for participation until the sample size was obtained. Trained research assistants conducted interviews with the participants in the absence of their parents or guardians.

Sample size determination

The sample size was powered to determine the readiness of transitioning. The sample size was calculated using a prevalence of 50% of readiness to transition, a 95% confidence interval, and an error margin of 5%. The prevalence of 50% was used since there was no previous study done in our context to determine the readiness to transition. A design effect of 2 was used to give us 784 adolescents.

Variables and measurements

Data were collected through face-to-face interviewer-administered questionnaires in a private room. The data collected from participants included socio-demographic characteristics (age at last birthday, gender, living status, main caregiver, education level, religion, marital status, being orphaned, and occupation), clinical and immunological data (the type of ART site, type of current treatment CD4, and viral load), HIV knowledge and disclosure, Transition process (Knowledge of own health, Knowledge of responsible behavior, Knowledge of response of emergency care, Knowledge of how to manage health care needs, Demonstration of responsible sexual behavior, keeping track of health needs, support groups, and transition plan). Ministry of Health developed this tool, and it is used to transition these adolescents in the ART clinic [14]. The readiness to transitioning was measured using variables in the transitioning process instrument. The total score of the tool was 38. If the young person scored 30 and above, they were ready to be transitioned [14]. The primary outcome measured was ready to transition if they scored 30 and above and not ready to transition if they scored below 30.

Data management and analysis

Participant’s age was clustered into 10–14 years and 15–19 years, 20–24, and above 24 years. Education status was grouped into out of school and in school, and education level was grouped into three categories: secondary, primary, and no education, and The occupation was grouped into three categories: students, unemployed and employed.

The proportion of those ready to transition was computed. To assess factors associated with readiness to transition, Pearson’s chi-square and Student t-test were used to measuring the association between these variables and for categorical and continuous explanatory variables, respectively.

Stepwise logistic regression models were built to identify independent predictors of transition readiness. During model development, the researcher considered all predictor variables with a p-value of ≤0.2 [24] at bivariate analysis were considered for inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model. Collinearity was assessed using a correlation matrix and cross-checked by using the variance inflation factor, which was set at 10 [25]. In case two variables were associated (P < 0.05), the variable explaining the largest variability (smaller p-value at univariate analysis) was retained. Significance was set at 0.05, and all of the analyses were two-tailed. Analyses were done using STATA®16.

Ethical review and approval

Ethical reviews and approval were obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences at Makerere University #SHSREC REF NO: 2019–029 and Uganda National Council of Science Technology (SS5063). Administrative clearance and permissions were also obtained from the management of each of the health facilities. Written informed consent was obtained from young people above 18 years. For adolescents below 18 years, assent from the adolescents and consent from parents or guardians was obtained and assent from the adolescents. Participation was voluntary, and all the interviews were conducted in private settings to ensure the participant’s confidentiality.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants

A total of 786 adolescents were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 17.48 years (SD = 4). The majority of the participants, 484 (61.6%), were females, most of the participants 363(46.2%) had no education; 310(39.4%), 183(23.3%) of the participants were employed, and 24 0(30.5%) came from families that received social support for their health. Only 362(46.1%) we’re living with their parents, and the rest were living with relatives 115(14.6%) and others with grandparents 93(11.3%). Main daily caregivers included parents 360(45.8%), relatives 107 (13.6%) and grandparents 100(12.7%). Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and their transition readiness.

Socio-demographic characteristic Total (n = 786) Readiness to transition
n (%) Not ready to transition n = 735 n (%) Ready to transition n = 51 n (%) P-value
Age (in years) 17.48 ± 4 17.35 ± 4.1 19.35 ± 2.4 0.002
Gender
Male 302(38.4) 284(38.6) 18(35.3) 0.635
Female 484(61.6) 451(61.4) 33(64.7)
Currently living with
Parents 362(46.1) 336(45.7) 26(51.0) 0.874
Grand parents 93(11.8) 86(11.7) 7(13.7)
Relatives 115(14.6) 109(14.8) 6(11.8)
In orphanage 3(0.4) 3(0.4) 0(0.0)
Others 213(27.1) 201(27.3) 12(23.5)
Mother still alive
Yes 509(64.8) 480(65.3) 29(56.9) 0.222
No 277(35.2) 255(34.7) 22(43.1)
Mother’s level of education
No education 46(9.1) 42(8.8) 4(13.8) 0.532
Primary education 150(29.5) 144(30.1) 6(20.7)
Secondary education 113(22.2) 104(21.7) 9(31.0)
Tertiary education 44(8.7) 41(8.6) 3(10.3)
Don’t know 155(30.5) 148(30.9) 7(24.1)
Father still alive
Yes 417(53.1) 393(53.5) 24(47.1) 0.375
No 369(46.9) 342(46.5) 27(52.9)
Main daily caregiver
Parents 360(45.8) 334(45.4) 26(51.0) 0.784
Grandparents 100(12.7) 92(12.5) 8(15.7)
Relatives 107(13.6) 101(13.7) 6(11.8)
In orphanage 3(0.4) 3(0.4) 0(0.0)
Others 216(27.5) 205(27.9) 11(21.6)
Your level of education
No education 363(46.2) 352(47.9) 11(21.6) <0.001
Primary education 310(39.4) 284(38.6) 26(51.0)
Secondary education 43(5.5) 37(5.0) 6(11.8)
Tertiary education 48(6.1) 40(5.4) 8(15.7)
Don’t know 22(2.8) 22(3.0) 0(0.0)
Are you employed
Yes 183(23.3) 161(21.9) 22(43.1) 0.001
No 603(76.6) 573(78.1) 29(56.9)
The family received social support
Yes 240(30.5) 215(29.3) 25(49.0) 0.003
No 546(69.5) 520(70.7) 26(51.0)

Clinical and immunological characteristics of the participants

According to their medical records obtained at the ART clinics, most of the participants, 549 (69.8%), were on first-line treatment and 237 (30.2%) were on second-line treatment. Participants had received services from an ART clinic for an average of 102 (SD = 74) months and had been on ART for 94 (SD = 70) months. The mean initial CD4 count was 580(SD = 948) cells/mm3. The mean viral load at first test was 27618 (SD = 133295) copies/ml, and at latest test was 13599 (SD = 86587) copies/ml. Based on the self-reported visual adherence scale, 92% were adherent to ART (Table 2). The rest of the clinical and immunological characteristics are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Clinical and immunological characteristics of adolescents living with HIV and transition readiness.

Variable Total (n = 786) Readiness to transition
n (%) Not ready to transition n = 735 n (%) Ready to transition n = 51 n (%) P-value
Type of ART site
Paediatric 8 (1.0) 8 (1.1) 0 (0.0) <0.001
Adult 90 (11.5) 71 (9.7) 19 (37.3)
Other 688 (87.5) 656 (89.3) 32 (62.7)
Type of current treatment
First line 549 (69.8) 513 (69.8) 36 (70.6) 0.905
Second line 237 (30.2) 222 (30.2) 15 (29.4)
Time since first ART clinic visit (in months) 102 ± 74 102 ± 74 101 ± 73 0.943
Time since first ART initiation (in months) 94 ± 70 94 ± 69 91 ± 70 0.767
Time from first visit to ART start (in months) 42± 72 40 ± 71 61 ± 77 0.044
First CD4 580 ± 948 596 ± 981 384 ± 320 0.073
First viral load 27618 ± 133295 27807 ± 134947 25087 ± 110105 0.896
Latest viral load 13599 ± 86587 14246 ± 89633 4989 ± 17073 0.451
Visual adherence scale 92 ± 29 92 ± 30 93 ± 9 0.694

Awareness and disclosure of HIV status

As shown in Table 3, most of the participants in this study, 702 (89.3%), knew that they were living with HIV, and 402(51.1%) reported that they acquired it from their mothers. About three quarters, 596 (75.8%) knew the kind of medicines they were receiving. Less than half of the participants, 379 (48.2%), had disclosed their HIV status to someone.

Table 3. Awareness and HIV status disclosure among adolescents living with HIV and their readiness to transition into adult ART services.

              Total       Readiness to transition
HIV knowledge and disclosure (n = 786) n (%) Not ready to transition n = 735 n (%) Ready to transition n = 51 n (%) P-value
Can you tell us what your disease is?
HIV/AIDS 702 (89.3) 651 (88.6) 51 (100.0) 0.011
Don’t know 84 (10.7) 84 (11.4) 0 (0.0)
Do you know how you got infected?
Mother to child 402 (51.1) 371 (50.5) 31 (60.8) 0.007
Don’t know 241 (30.7) 235 (32.0) 6 (11.8)
Others 143 (18.2) 129 (17.6) 14 (27.5)
Do you know how this disease is transmitted?
Mother to child 77 (9.8) 72 (9.8) 5 (9.8) 0.038
Unprotected sex 397 (50.5) 361 (49.2) 36 (70.6)
Sharing needles 57 (7.3) 56(7.6) 1 (2.0)
Blood transfusion 5 (0.6) 5 (0.7) 0 (0.0)
Others 248 (31.6) 239 (32.6) 9 (17.6)
Do you know what kind of medicine you have received?
ART 596 (75.8) 546 (74.3) 50 (98.0) <0.001
Don’t know 190 (24.2) 189 (25.7) 1 (2.0)
Have you ever disclosed your HIV status to anyone?
Yes 379 (48.2) 343 (46.7) 36 (70.6) 0.001
No 407 (51.8) 392 (53.3) 15 (29.4)

The preparation process for the transition into adult care

According to this study, 247(31.4%) of the participants had received counselling on the transition to adult services, and of these, the majority 178(72.1%) were counselled by /peer educators and health providers 61(24.7%). However, only 33(4.2%) had completed a transfer form. In addition, only 97(12.3%) had visited an adult ART clinic to prepare for the transition, and of these majority, 40(41.2%) and 40(41.2%) were taken to the adult clinic by counsellors and peer educators, respectively. Almost all of the adolescents who had visited the adult Clinic 93(95.9%) stated that the visit helped prepare for the transition. When asked about their preparedness to manage their treatment going forward, 445(56.6%) said that they were very prepared; 184(23.4%) were somewhat prepared, and 157(20.1%) were very unprepared. However, when asked about their satisfaction with the preparation process for transition in general, 126(16.0%) reported that they were very satisfied; 226(28.8%) were somewhat satisfied; 399(50.8%) were somewhat dissatisfied, and 35(4.5%) were very dissatisfied. The rest of the results on the experience for preparation for transition among participants in this study are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Experience of preparation for the transition of adolescents to adult ART care and transition readiness.

Total Readiness to transition
Experience of preparation for transition (n = 786) n (%) Not ready to transition n = 735 n (%) Ready to transition n = 51 n (%) P-value
Which facility do you prefer to receive HIV treatment and care?
Pediatric ART services 48(6.1) 48(6.5) 0(0.0) <0.001
Adult ART services 122(15.5) 102(13.9) 20(39.2)
Adolescent friendly services 616(78.4) 585(79.6) 31(60.8)
The person you trust most with your treatment?
Health care provider 261(33.2) 248(33.8) 13(25.5) 0.018
Counsellor 55(7.0) 49(6.7) 6(11.8)
Peer educator 11(1.4) 9(1.2) 2(3.9)
Friends 33(4.2) 27(3.7) 6(11.8)
Family 389(49.5) 368(50.2_ 21(41.2)
Others 35(4.5) 32(4.4) 3(5.9)
Received counselling on the transition to adult services
Yes 247(31.4) 213(29.0) 34(66.7) <0.001
No 539(68.6) 522(71.0) 17(33.3)
The person who provided the counselling
Health provider 61(24.7) 53(24.9) 8(23.5) 0.495
Counsellor/ peer educator 178(72.1) 152(71.4) 26(76.5)
Others 8(3.2) 8(3.8) 0(0.0)
Ever completed a transfer form
Yes 33(4.2) 25(3.4) 8(15.7) <0.001
No 753(95.8) 710(96.6) 43(8.3)
Ever visited an adult clinic to prepare for the transition
Yes 97(12.3) 66(9.0) 31(60.8) <0.001
No 689(87.7) 669(91.0) 20(39.2)
The person who took you to the adult clinic to prepare for the transition
Counsellors 40(41.2) 28(42.4) 12(38.7) 0.335
Peer educators 40(41.2) 24(36.4) 16(51.6)
Friends 1(1.0) 1(1.5) 0(0.0)
Family 6(6.2%) 6(9.1) 0(0.0)
Others 10(10.3) 7(10.6) 3(9.7)
Was the visit helpful to cope with the transition
Yes 93(95.9) 62(93.9) 31(100.0) 0.162
No 4(4.1) 4(6.1) 0(0.0)
Is there a person in the identified to support you during the transition
Yes 76(78.4) 48(72.7) 28(90.3) 0.050
No 21(21.6) 18(27.3) 3(9.7)
Were you prepared to manage your treatment going forward?
Very prepared 445(56.6) 398(54.1) 47(92.2) <0.001
Somewhat prepared 184(23.4) 182(24.8) 2(3.9)
Very unprepared 157(20.0) 155(21.1) 2(3.9)
Satisfied with the preparation process for transition in general
Very satisfied 126 (16.0) 95 (12.9) 31 (60.8) <0.001
Somewhat satisfied 226 (28.8) 218 (29.7) 8 (15.7)
Somewhat dissatisfied 399 (50.8) 388 (52.8) 11 (21.6)
Very dissatisfied 35 (4.5) 34 (4.6) 1 (2.0)

Assessment of adolescents’ readiness for the transition into adult care

Based on the readiness to transition tool employed in this study, 51 (6.5%) of the adolescents were ready to transition to adult care.

Factors associated with readiness to transition of adolescents into adult care

Bivariate analyses showed that adolescents who were ready to transition were significantly more likely to be older (17.3±4 years vs. 19.4 ± 2 years, p = 0.002), working for pay (21.9% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.001), and their family having received social support for their health (29.3% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.003). In contrast, adolescents who were not ready to transition were more likely to have no education (47.9% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.001) (Table 1).

Adolescents who were not ready to transition were significantly more likely to report that they did not know their disease (11.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.011), to not know how they got infected (32.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.007) and do not know the kind of medicines they were receiving (25.7% vs. 2.0%, p = < 0.001). On the other hand, adolescents who were ready to transition were more likely to have disclosed their HIV status to someone (46.7% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.001) and to know that they were receiving ART (74.3% vs. 98.0%, p = < 0.001) (Table 3).

Adolescents who were ready to transition were significantly more likely to prefer receiving HIV treatment and care from Adult ART services (13.9% vs. 39.2%, p = <0.001), to have received counselling on transition to adult services (29.0% vs. 66.7%, p = < 0.001), to have completed a transfer form (3.4% vs. 15.7%, p = < 0.001) and to have visited an adult clinic to prepare for transition (9.0% vs. 60.8%, p = < 0.001). In addition, adolescents who were ready to transition perceived that they were very prepared to manage their treatment going forward (54.1% vs. 92.2%, p = < 0.001), and reported that they were very satisfied with the preparation process for transition in general (12.9% vs. 60.8%, p < 0.001) (Table 4).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that readiness to transition into adult care remained significantly associated with having acquired a tertiary education (AOR 4.535, 95% CI 1.243–16.546, P = 0.022), trusting peer educators for HIV treatment (AOR 16.222, 95% CI 1.835–143.412, P = 0.012), having received counselling on transition to adult services (AOR 2.349, 95% CI 1.004–5.495, P = 0.049), having visited an adult clinic to prepare for transition (AOR 6.616, 95% CI 2.435–17.987, P = < 0.001) and being satisfied with the transition process in general (AOR 0.213, 95% CI 0.069–0.658, P = 0.007) (Table 5).

Table 5. Factors associated with readiness to transition of adolescents from adolescent clinics to adult ART clinic in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Variables in the final model Readiness to transition
AOR (95% CL) P-value
Your level of education
No education Reference
Primary education 1.345 (0.547–3.309) 0.518
Secondary education 1.322 (0.352–4.965) 0.679
Tertiary education 4.535 (1.243–16.546) 0.022
The person you trust most with your treatment
Health provider Reference
Counsellor 2.208 (0.594–8.199) 0.237
Peer educator 16.222 (1.835–143.412) 0.012
Friends 0.873 (0.192–3.974) 0.861
Family 0.820 (0.329–2.044) 0.670
Others 0.865 (0.175–4.283) 0.859
Received counselling on the transition to adult services
No Reference
Yes 2.349 (1.004–5.495) 0.049
I visited an adult clinic to prepare for the transition
No Reference
Yes 6.619 (2.435–17.987) <0.001
Satisfied with the preparation process for transition in general
Very satisfied Reference
Somewhat satisfied 0.216 (0.012–3.805) 0.295
Somewhat dissatisfied 0.546 (0.179–1.670) 0.289
Very dissatisfied 0.213 (0.069–0.658) 0.007

Discussion

Ensuring effective transition from pediatric/adolescent/young people to adult care is a countrywide priority for optimizing young people’s health and critical for the prevention of HIV transmission to wider communities. Also, understanding the factors associated with adolescents’ transition readiness from adolescent clinics to adult clinics is critical in designing adolescent-friendly services that will facilitate successful transitioning from adolescent to adult care. However, there is limited information about transitioning adolescents to adult care and its associated factors in Uganda. Hence, this study aimed to assess the factors associated with adolescents’ transition readiness from adolescent clinics to adult ART clinics.

Adolescents are a very heterogeneous group, and that age is a critical variable related to the sexual, physical, sexual, cognitive, and psychological development of the adolescents. We also acknowledge that adolescents of the same age may be at different levels of development. Indeed, some of the adolescents live on their own; some are already parents, while others are dependent on parents or guardians. While the preparation of transitioning should start early as per standard operating procedures, to ensure that by the time adolescents reach the age of 18 years, where they have to nominally transfer to the adult’s HIV clinic, it is not clear that by that age, all adolescents are ready and prepared for the HIV care transition. The fact that there are some young people still seeking care in the adolescent HIV clinics, as well as older adolescents who seek care from adult HIV clinics, is an indication that many individuals may not be ready for or may experience some challenges and barriers in the HIV care transition. Factors associated with readiness to transition included; peer education, education level, receiving counselling on the transition to adult care, and visiting an adult clinic to prepare for the transition.

Early preparation of adolescents and young people living with HIV for transition is essential for the effective transition to adult care, and according to the guidelines, it should be a process that starts early, even before adolescence. The overall readiness for transition from paediatric/adolescent to adult ART care among YPLHIV in this study was very low at 51 (6.5%). This could be attributed to the fact that the majority of the participants in this study were below 20 years. Yet, most of the facilities in this study reported starting to prepare their adolescents and young people for transitioning at 20 years. They are ready by 24 years and therefore were not yet prepared for transitioning. This study’s level of transition readiness was lower than that earlier found in a study conducted in Cambodia, which found that 53.3% of the adolescents had a high level of transition readiness to adult ART care [15]. This difference could be due to the implementation of the transitioning process in different countries.

Adolescents with HIV have been found to develop strong and long-lasting relations with their care teams and fellow HIV adolescents, hence seeing them as their extended family members [16, 17]. A high level of transition readiness to adult care was independently associated with trust in peer educators for HIV treatment in our study. These findings are consistent with those of other studies that have also shown the importance of peers and friends coping with adult care transition [15, 18]. Peer support can help adolescents develop confidence in themselves and also acquire different coping mechanisms and skills.

A high level of readiness to transition was independently associated with having tertiary education. These findings are in line with those of other studies, which also found that attaining a higher education was a strong predictor of uptake of HIV related services, including voluntary counselling and testing [19, 20], prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV [21], and transition to adult care [22]. This may be attributed to the fact that HIV-positive adolescents who have attained higher education have more knowledge about their disease and self-care management skills. Our findings suggest that some of the challenges for adolescents for a transition readiness include leaving people they are familiar and comfortable with when they transit to adult HIV clinics, being seen by healthcare providers who are unfamiliar with their illness, challenges of change due to growing up, leaving a familiar clinic and staff whom they trust, and losing the ongoing support system which they have enjoyed over the years in the adolescent clinic, and the reluctance of healthcare providers in the adolescent clinic to facilitate a smooth transition process.

Counselling on the transition to adult care is critical in preparing adolescents and young people for a better transition process. Our study’s high level of transition readiness was independently associated with receiving specific counselling on the transition to adult services while still in adolescent clinics. Emphasizing the need and counselling the adolescents about transitioning is a facilitator for transitioning, also reported in other studies [23, 24]. Several adolescents have stated inbuilt fears about transitioning, including fear to lose friends and peers when transitioned to adult art care, fear of stigma and discrimination while in the adult clinics [24, 25], and therefore addressing such fears through counselling while in the adolescent clinics will enable these adolescents to address and overcome such fears and prepare them for a better transition.

Creating familiarity with the adult clinics, such as scheduling visits to these clinics, has a significant effect in facilitating adolescents’ connection to the adult clinics and the overall transition in general [15, 26]. Scheduling visits to the adult clinic before transition enables adolescents to become oriented to the new clinic setting, health providers, and expectations [2729]. These findings are consistent with our study results, which showed that a higher level of transition readiness was independently associated with having visited an adult clinic to prepare for the transition. Therefore, visiting the adult clinic enables these adolescents to acquire insight into what happens in the adult clinic to get to know the different health providers in the adult clinic and get familiar with the adults themselves.

While of much importance, age is not the only important predictor of transition readiness, and age may not correspond with physical, cognitive, sexual, or psychological maturity, all of which may influence transition readiness. While most HIV- infected adolescents transition to adult care is usually between 22–24 years of age, there are some who show readiness at earlier or later ages. From our findings, a stratified analysis of transitional readiness showed that compared to adolescents 10–14 years, older adolescents and young people were more likely to manifest transitional readiness. However, chronological age is not the only predictor of transitional readiness. Growing adolescents face unique developmental, psychological, and sexuality challenges as they are still maturing physically, mentally, and sexually. Such adolescents with chronic illnesses often engage in many of the same risk behaviors as their unaffected peers, which behaviors put them at risk of increased morbidity and mortality, and with the potential to affect readiness, preparedness, and coping ability for the HIV care transition. This is in addition to contextual challenges encountered by most people living with HIV regardless of age, including stigma, disclosure difficulties, challenges with adherence, and socioeconomic hardships, relationship issues, and sexuality problems and all of which prevent attainment of optimal health outcomes in case they affect transition readiness or eventually successful transition. Our findings further confirm that transitional readiness is multifaceted and impacts the access to medical care. Also, the findings suggest that the timing of the transition may differ for each individual in a given clinical and social context. While it may be dependent on factors such as age, developmental stage of the adolescent or youth, and other social factors, it is possibly very challenging for some adolescents.

Conclusion

Preparation for transition to adult care for adolescents living with HIV needs to be a planned process involving counselling and adolescents’ exposure to what goes on in adult HIV clinics. Counselling on the transition to adult care is critical in preparing adolescents and young people for a better transition process and ensure transition readiness. This counselling may need to be started early. It should be individualized so that it is personalised to adolescents’ specific needs, as transition readiness in our study was independently associated with receiving specific counselling on the transition to adult services while still in adolescent clinics. Such counselling should address barriers to transition, such as fear of losing friends and peers when transitioned to adult art care, fear of stigma and discrimination in adult clinics, privacy, and confidentiality. Future research may be needed to assess the quality of care for adolescents after transition and assess the effectiveness of different models of adolescent transition.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Anonymized data set.

(XLSX)

S1 File. Ministry of health transition tool.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the adolescents and young people in all the facilities we collected data and the research assistants.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Grant Number D43TW010132 supported by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (OD), National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute (NHLBI), Fogarty International Center (FIC), National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD). Received by Scovia Nalugo Mbalinda (SNM). Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No--B 8606.R02), Sida (Grant No:54100029), the DELTAS Africa Initiative (Grant No: 107768/Z/15/Z). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS) 's Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa's Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (UK) and the UK government. Received by Scovia Nalugo Mbalinda (SNM). The research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 1R25TW011213. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Dahourou DL, Gautier‐Lafaye C, Teasdale CA, Renner L, Yotebieng M, Desmonde S, et al.: Transition from paediatric to adult care of adolescents living with HIV in sub‐Saharan Africa: challenges, youth‐friendly models, and outcomes. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21528. 10.7448/IAS.20.4.21528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS: On the fast-track to end AIDS: UNAIDS 2016–2021 Strategy. Geneva, Switzerland 2016. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/20151027_UNAIDS_PCB37_15_18_EN_rev1.pdf
  • 3.Ministry of Health: Uganda Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (UPHIA) 2016–2017. In.: MOH Uganda; 2017. uac.go.ug/sites/default/files/UPHIA Final Report %5B2016–2017%5D.pdf
  • 4.Acree ME: Transition of care for youth with HIV. Pediatric annals 2017, 46(5):e198–e202. 10.3928/19382359-20170424-02 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization: Adolescent HIV Testing, Counselling And Care: Implementation Guidelines For Health Providers And Planners. Geneva, Switzerland[Google Scholar] 2014. WHO | HIV and adolescents: Guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV
  • 6.Dahourou DL, Gautier-Lafaye C, Teasdale CA, Renner L, Yotebieng M, Desmonde S, et al.: Transition from paediatric to adult care of adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges, youth-friendly models, and outcomes. J Int AIDS Soc 2017, 20(Suppl 3):21528. 10.7448/IAS.20.4.21528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Acree ME: Transition of Care for Youth with HIV. Pediatr Ann 2017, 46(5):e198–e202. 10.3928/19382359-20170424-02 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asire B, Nabukeera-Barungi N, Elyanu P, Katureebe C, Lukabwe I, Namusoke E, et al.: Adolescent HIV care and treatment in Uganda: Care models, best practices and innovations to improve services. Journal of Infectious Diseases & Preventive Medicine, 2017, 5(1):1–6. 10.4172/2329-8731.1000150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nyabigambo A, Muliira JK, Atuyambe L, Babikako HM, Kambugu A, Ndoleriire C: Determinants of utilization of a no-cost HIV transition clinic: a cross-sectional study of young adults living with HIV/AIDS. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2014, 5:89–99. 10.2147/AHMT.S57950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nyabigambo A, Muliira JK, Kambugu A: Transitional Clinic Utilization and General Well Being of Ugandan Young Adults Living with HIV/AIDS. Value Health 2014, 17(7):A666: Transitional.—Google Scholar 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bakanda C, Birungi J, Mwesigwa R, Nachega JB, Chan K, Palmer A, et al.: Survival of HIV-infected adolescents on antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: findings from a nationally representative cohort in Uganda. PLoS One 2011, 6(4):e19261. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.MacCarthy S, Saya U, Samba C, Birungi J, Okoboi S, Linnemayr S: "How am I going to live?": exploring barriers to ART adherence among adolescents and young adults living with HIV in Uganda. BMC Public Health 2018, 18(1):1158. 10.1186/s12889-018-6048-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bermudez LG, Jennings L, Ssewamala FM, Nabunya P, Mellins C, McKay M: Equity in adherence to antiretroviral therapy among economically vulnerable adolescents living with HIV in Uganda. AIDS Care 2016, 28 Suppl 2:83–91. 10.1080/09540121.2016.1176681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ministry of Health Uganda: Adolescent HIV Care, Treatment, and Support: A Participant’s Manual. In. Edited by Program AC Kampala, Uganda; 2015.
  • 15.Yi S, Ngin C, Pal K, Khol V, Tuot S, Sau S, et al.: Transition into adult care: factors associated with level of preparedness among adolescents living with HIV in Cambodia. AIDS research and therapy 2017, 14(1):33. 10.1186/s12981-017-0159-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gilliam PP, Ellen JM, Leonard L, Kinsman S, Jevitt CM, Straub DM: Transition of adolescents with HIV to adult care: characteristics and current practices of the adolescent trials network for HIV/AIDS interventions. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 2011, 22(4):283–294. 10.1016/j.jana.2010.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Valenzuela JM, Buchanan CL, Radcliffe J, Ambrose C, Hawkins LA, Tanney M, et al.: Transition to adult services among behaviorally infected adolescents with HIV—a qualitative study. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2011, 36(2):134–140. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Battles HB, Wiener LS : From adolescence through young adulthood: psychosocial adjustment associated with long-term survival of HIV. Journal of adolescent health 2002, 30(3):161–168. 10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00341-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cremin I, Cauchemez S, Garnett GP, Gregson S : Patterns of uptake of HIV testing in sub‐Saharan Africa in the pre‐treatment era. Tropical medicine & international health 2012, 17(8):e26–e37. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02937.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wringe A, Isingo R, Urassa M, Maiseli G, Manyalla R, Changalucha J, et al.: Uptake of HIV voluntary counselling and testing services in rural Tanzania: implications for effective HIV prevention and equitable access to treatment. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2008, 13(3):319–327. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02005.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ejigu Y, Tadesse B: HIV testing during pregnancy for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Ethiopia. PloS one 2018, 13(8):e0201886. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lolekha R, Boon‐yasidhi V, Na‐Nakorn Y, Manaboriboon B, Vandepitte WP, Martin M, et al.: The Happy Teen programme: a holistic outpatient clinic‐based approach to prepare HIV‐infected youth for the transition from paediatric to adult medical care services in Thailand. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21500. 10.7448/IAS.20.4.21500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mbalinda SN, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Lusota DA, Magongo EN, Musoke P, Kaye DK: Barriers and facilitators for transitioning of young people from adolescent clinics to adult ART clinics in Uganda: unintended consequences of successful adolescent ART clinics. BMC Health Services Research 2020, 20(1):1–12. 10.1186/s12913-020-05701-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Masese RV, Ramos JV, Rugalabamu L, Luhanga S, Shayo AM, Stewart KA, et al.: Challenges and facilitators of transition from adolescent to adult HIV care among young adults living with HIV in Moshi, Tanzania. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2019, 22(10):e25406. 10.1002/jia2.25406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wiener LS, Kohrt B-A, Battles HB, Pao M: The HIV experience: youth identified barriers for transitioning from pediatric to adult care. Journal of pediatric psychology 2011, 36(2):141–154. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ryscavage P, Macharia T, Patel D, Palmeiro R, Tepper V: Linkage to and retention in care following healthcare transition from pediatric to adult HIV care. AIDS care 2016, 28(5):561–565. 10.1080/09540121.2015.1131967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Machado DM, Galano E, de Menezes Succi RC, Vieira CM, Turato ER: Adolescents growing with HIV/AIDS: experiences of the transition from pediatrics to adult care. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2016, 20(3):229–234. 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pinzón-Iregui MC, Ibanez G, Beck-Sagué C, Halpern M, Mendoza RM: "… like because you are a grownup, you do not need help": Experiences of transition from pediatric to adult care among youth with perinatal HIV infection, their caregivers, and health care providers in the Dominican Republic. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC) 2017, 16(6):579–587. 10.1177/2325957417729749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kung TH, Wallace ML, Snyder KL, Robson VK, Mabud TS, Kalombo CD, et al.: South African healthcare provider perspectives on transitioning adolescents into adult HIV care. South African Medical Journal 2016, 106(8):804–808. 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i8.10496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Claudia Marotta

9 Feb 2021

PONE-D-21-00972

Transition to adult care:  Exploring factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young people in adolescent ART clinics in Uganda

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Scovia,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 28 February. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

dear authors follow reviewer suggestions to improve your article

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1) Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2) In the Methods section, please provide a justification for the stratification of readiness to transition score used in the study (ie, please provide a justification as to why scores of 30< were classified as ready to be transitioned).

3) Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

4) We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

5)  We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

6) Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors’ affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating “current affiliation:….” as necessary).

7) Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Transition to adult care: Exploring factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young people in adolescent ART clinics in Uganda

Study Summary

The study of Mbalinda and colleagues aims at exploring factors associated with adolescent readiness for the transition into adult care in Uganda. To achieve this goal, the authors conducted a cross-sectional study involving 786 individuals, aged 10 years to 24 years, among whom they explored the readiness for transition to adult clinics using structured interviews. The results indicated that 51 (6.5%) of the participants “adolescents” were ready to transition to adult care, based on the readiness to transition tolls they employed. The authors discussed their findings around this low readiness to transition in the ART program in Uganda.

Reviewer observations

Children and adolescent currently represent key populations with increasing challenges regarding HIV/AIDS care and monitoring management. It is obvious that specific strategies should be implemented for those key populations and should be adapted to their specific needs. Transition from pediatric services to adult wards is an important step, which may significantly affect the future outcome of ART of the adolescent if not adequately managed. This highlights the importance of such investigations that may help identifying factors that can affect the success of the transition.

Major queries

A. The study population

According to WHO, adolescents refer to individuals aged 10 to 19 years. This population is managed in pediatric/adolescent services until they reach the age for transition to adult services.

The study population of this report includes both adolescents and young adults aged from 10 to 24 years. It not clear in this study design and it is not indicated anywhere in the manuscript if the age group considered in Uganda for adolescent is 10-24 years. I believe not, since the authors consider the group from 20 to 24 years old as “young adults” and not adolescents.

In addition, in the methods presented, there is no indication if this study population “adolescent and young adults” was recruited in pediatric/adolescent services or in adult services as well. It is only mentioned (lines 120-121) that they were recruited “ …in antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics in four regions of Uganda”.

This is a critical aspect of the validity of this study, since adequate definition of the population studied is essential to achieve the expected outcome. Is not clear how assessing transition readiness among a so wide age group (10 to 24) using the same investigation tools/questionnaires, will permit identifying factors affecting the transition. Are individuals aged 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 years, etc, expected to be ready for transition to adult services?

The high heterogeneity of this population can be the main reason of the very low transition readiness that the authors reported 51/786 (6.5%).

There is no rational on the selection of the different aged groups:

- What was expected as outcome from the population of 10-14? Is it expected that adolescent of this age group are ready for the transition?

- For those aged 20-24 years, are they still follow-up in pediatric/adolescent services? If no, why was this population included in the study?

- If the age of transition to adult services in Uganda is 24 years, in this case even for the group of 15-19 years, it will be hard to expect the same perception of readiness to transition compared to those aged 20-24 years.

This key aspect of the study, in my opinion, critically affects the validity of the results obtained.

B. Other key points

- Lines 80-88: the characteristics presented as referring to “transition readiness” are not supported by any reference. Are these definitions made by the authors, Ugandan authorities or international organizations? No reference presented.

- Lines 100-101: “…Further, those at the highest risk for health complications and transmission of HIV to others (males, those living further away from health facilities) are…”. Do authors have specific references to support this?

Reviewer #2: Line 66/67:delete redundant In Uganda [2]. Line 120 did you mean PLHIV? Also please spell out PLHIV when used for the first time in the manuscript. For lines 255-259, recommend listed the statistic for those ready for transition first vs those not ready for transition as opposed to the other way round. eg. bivariate analyses showed that adolescents who were ready to transition were significantly more like to be older (19.4+-2 yrs vs 17.3+-4 yrs).

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review-PONE-D-21-00972.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0249971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249971.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Feb 2021

Makerere University

P.O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda Tel: 256 414 530404

E-mail: nursing@chs.mak.ac.ug

SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES

Department of Nursing

22nd February 2021

The Editor,

PLOS ONE

Dear Sir.

Re: Response to Reviewers comments

Thank you for your encouragement to revise and to resubmit our manuscript entitled: "Transition to adult care: Exploring factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young people in adolescent ART clinics in Uganda."

Attached is our resubmission.

We have attempted to address all the reviewers' comments and recommendations. We believe that our manuscript has been strengthened, and we thank the reviewers for taking the time to read the manuscript and to specify these recommendations

Yours faithfully,

ScoviaNalugoMbalinda

Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda

E-mail: smbalinda@gmail.com.

Comments

Major queries

A. The study population

1. According to WHO, adolescents refer to individuals aged 10 to 19 years. This population is managed in pediatric/adolescent services until they reach the age for the transition to adult services.

Response: Yes, adolescents are aged 10-19, but when we went to ART clinics, there were young people (aged above 19 years) who were still attending the clinic for HIV care services. Secondly, some adolescents are aged 19 years, and less attend HIV care in the adult HIV clinic.

2. The study population of this report includes both adolescents and young adults aged from 10 to 24 years. It not clear in this study design and it is not indicated anywhere in the manuscript if the age group considered in Uganda for adolescent is 10-24 years. I believe not, since the authors consider the group from 20 to 24 years old as "young adults" and not adolescents.

Response: Adolescents are aged 10-19, but we found that the adolescents had refused to go to adult ART clinics. We included adolescents (10-19 years) and young people to capture the age group 20-24. That why we included young people in the topic and the methodology we have stated that adolescents and young people. Page line 126,130 on page 6.

The provision of HIV care in this period is a continuum. The anomaly is that some adolescents attend HIV care in adult clinics while some young people still seek HIV care in adolescent clinics. Both scenarios potentially affect the quality of care received. That's why in the topic, we included adolescents and young people in the study to analyse the transition of HIV care from adolescent to adult clinics, with a focus on transition readiness from adolescent to adult HIV care. The questions where information was needed are whether, irrespective of age, the population of adolescents and young people were ready to transition from adolescent to adult clinics, as were their readiness for the transition process. Line 113-116, page 6.

3. In addition, in the methods presented, there is no indication if this study population "adolescent and young adults" was recruited in pediatric/adolescent services or in adult services as well. It is only mentioned (lines 120-121) that they were recruited "…in antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics in four regions of Uganda".

Response: The adolescents and young people were recruited from adolescent ART clinics in each facility. The adolescent clinics were running once a week. Line 130, Page 6.

The participants' selection was the age of the adolescents and young people who were attending HIV care in the adolescent clinics.

4. This is a critical aspect of the validity of this study since an adequate definition of the population studied is essential to achieve the expected outcome. It is not clear how assessing transition readiness among a so wide age group (10 to 24) using the same investigation tools/questionnaires will identify factors affecting the transition. Are individuals aged 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 years, etc, expected to be ready for transition to adult services?

Response: The preparation of transitioning starts early as per standard operating procedures.

It starts 10-13 years by making transition plans and addressing concerns about support for parents/ care during transitions. As adolescents grow, they add other issues of independence and responsibility for themselves. Every 3-6 months, the adolescents are assessed as per the protocol described in the paper. If they score 30 and above, then they are ready to transition.

The age of transition: Most HIV- infected adolescents transition to adult care between 22 and 24 years of age. However, developmental stages and readiness for transition may be better indicators than chronological age for determining when the transition should occur. Patients with developmental delays or chaotic and unstable life may need more time to become ready to transition. Adolescents who demonstrate independence in making their own decision and show responsibility for their care may be ready sooner.

We had earlier explained the process in line 104-112, page 5-6

5. The high heterogeneity of this population can be the main reason of the very low transition readiness that the authors reported 51/786 (6.5%).

Response: Yes, that could be the reason, however like we said, the transition is a process, and it starts as early as ten years, and the adolescents are assessed on different aspects like HIV knowledge and disclosure, Transition process, Knowledge of own health, Knowledge of responsible behavior, Knowledge of response of emergency care, Knowledge of how to manage health care needs, Demonstration of responsible sexual behavior, keeping track of health needs, support groups, and transition plan. Each adolescent is assessed in an individualized manner for skills development and understanding of successful transition and Address barriers for each patient that may prevent skills acquisition and providers from developing a transition plan and then implementing that plan.

6. There is no rational on the selection of the different aged groups:

- What was expected as outcome from the population of 10-14? Is it expected that adolescent of this age group are ready for the transition?

Response: Transition process is a process. It does not start at the age of transition but as early as ten years. So irrespective of the age as long you are ready for the transition as per protocol you will be transitioned.

- For those aged 20-24 years, are they still follow-up in pediatric/adolescent services? If no, why was this population included in the study?

Response: Yes, this group was in the adolescent clinic, and they had failed to transition. That is why they were included in the study

- If the age of transition to adult services in Uganda is 24 years, in this case even for the group of 15-19 years, it will be hard to expect the same perception of readiness to transition compared to those aged 20-24 years.

Response: Initially, the transition age was 19. However, the Ministry of health realized that some of the adolescents were not ready for the transition. It increased the age of transition to adult care between 22-24 years of age. But protocol stated that developmental stages and readiness for transition might be better indicators than chronological age for determining when the transition should occur. Patients with developmental delays or chaotic and unstable life may need more time to become ready to transition. Adolescents who demonstrate independence in making their own decision and show responsibility for their own care would transition earlier.

B. Other key points

- Lines 80-88: the characteristics presented as referring to "transition readiness" are not supported by any reference. Are these definitions made by the authors, Ugandan authorities, or international organizations? No reference presented.

Response: Reference is added. Line 88, page 5

- Lines 100-101: "…Further, those at the highest risk for health complications and transmission of HIV to others (males, those living further away from health facilities) are…". Do authors have specific references to support this?

Response: The references are there 11-13

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1) Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: This has been addressed in the manuscript

2) In the Methods section, please provide a justification for the stratification of readiness to transition score used in the study (ie, please provide a justification as to why scores of 30< were classified as ready to be transitioned).

Response: The score was used because it's a score that the Ministry of Health uses as a cut-off to show whether the adolescent or young person is ready for the transition. The total score of the tool was 38. If the young person scored 30 and above, they were ready to be transitioned. If they scored 25- 30, they would be reassessed and transitioned after three months in case they score 30. I have added the reference for this line 158, page 8. I have also attached the tool as a supporting file.

3) Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting information.

Response: Ministry of Health developed the tool to aid the transition in the clinical area. We only added the socio-demographic and clinical, and immunological data. We have attached it as a supporting file

4) We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Response: We have edited the manuscript

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

• The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

• A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

• A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

Response: This has been addressed

5) We note that the grant information you provided in the 'Funding Information' and 'Financial Disclosure' sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the 'Funding Information' section.

Response: This has been addressed

6) Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors' affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating "current affiliation:…." as necessary).

Response: This has been addressed

7) Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Response: This has been addressed Page line 555, page 30

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments.docx

Decision Letter 1

Claudia Marotta

29 Mar 2021

Transition to adult care:  Exploring factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young people in adolescent ART clinics in Uganda

PONE-D-21-00972R1

Dear Dr.  Mbalinda,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

congratulations

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Lines 327-329 is confusing, please rephrase.

Need to expand the thought in lines 331 and 332 some more: what is different in the implementation of the transitioning process in Uganda vs Cambodia

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Claudia Marotta

12 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-00972R1

Transition to adult care:  Exploring factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young people in adolescent ART clinics in Uganda

Dear Dr. Mbalinda:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Dataset. Anonymized data set.

    (XLSX)

    S1 File. Ministry of health transition tool.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review-PONE-D-21-00972.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES