Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0248937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248937

Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves’ disease: A prospective study

Sherifa Ahmed Hamed 1,*, Fadia Ahmed Attiah 1, Samir Kamal Abdulhamid 2, Mohamed Fawzy 1
Editor: Melissa A Brotman3
PMCID: PMC8084231  PMID: 33914772

Abstract

Previous studies have identified frequent comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders and conditions in adults with thyrotoxicosis. These studies are scarce or even lacking in pediatric population. This work aimed to study the behavior of children and adolescents with Graves’ disease (GD). This study included 35 children with GD (boys = 15; girls = 25; mean age: 11.45±1.50yrs) and 40 healthy children (boys = 20; girls = 20; mean age: 12.54±1.62yrs). Behavior was assessed using Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Children with GD were assessed during periods of thyroid hormone elevation (active disease) and normalized thyroid hormones (with anti-thyroid drugs or ATDs). Compared to healthy children, patients during periods of thyroid hormone elevation (74.29%) and normalized thyroid hormones (31.43%) had higher frequencies of behavioral abnormalities and scorings of total CBCL scale (P = 0.01; P = 0.04, respectively) and its subscales’ [Anxious/Depressed (P = 0.02; P = 0.04), Withdrawn/Depressed (P = 0.03; P = 0.04) and Somatic Complaints (P = 0.03; P = 0.127) and Social (P = 0.01; P = 0.225), Thought (P = 0.01; P = 0.128) and Attention (P = 0.01; P = 0.01) problems], indicating internalizing and externalizing problems. The majority of patients had at least two different behavioral problems. Marked improvement was found during period of normalized thyroid hormones (P = 0.001). Correlation analyses showed significant associations between total CBCL scoring and age at onset (P = 0.01; P = 0.001) and lower concentrations of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (P = 0.001; P = 0.04) and higher concentrations of free thyroxine (fT4) (P = 0.01; P = 0.02), triiodothyronine (fT3) (P = 0.01; P = 0.03) and thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAbs) (P = 0.001; P = 0.01) during periods of thyroid hormone elevation and normalized thyroid hormones, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that "at presentation" lower concentrations of TSH (P = 0.001; P = 0.03) and higher concentrations of fT4 (P = 0.001, P = 0.01), fT3 (P = 0.01; P = 0.06) and TRAbs (P = 0.001; P = 0.001) were predictors of behavioral problems during periods of active disease and normalized thyroid hormones. We conclude that GD is associated with higher frequencies and severities of anxiety, depression and inattention during periods of thyroid hormone elevation as well as normalized thyroid hormones with ATDs. Therefore, early diagnosis and optimizing management are required to improve children’s social life.

Introduction

Graves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of childhood hyperthyroidism. It accounts for 10–15% of thyroid diseases in children less than 18 years old [1]. It may occur at any age during childhood and has its peak during adolescence [2]. GD is due to a complex interaction between genetics, environment, and immune system [3]. For many years, psychiatric assessment of adults with different states of hyperthyroidism [subclinical, overt or normal thyroid hormone levels’ state with anti-thyroid drugs (ATDs) or thyroidectomy], is the focus of some studies and reviews. These studies documented the occurrence of more severe somatic manifestations beyond the integral manifestations of thyrotoxicosis and other comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions and disorders [46]. However, the incidence and prevalence of these neuropsychiatric comorbidities are not known. Reviews of literature documented that the frequencies of psychiatric symptoms with thyrotoxicosis vary widely from less than 10 to more than 70% [47]. Studies which assessed behavior in children with thyrotoxicosis are scarce. The frequently reported neurobehavioral manifestations in children with thyrotoxicosis include cognitive deterioration or poor scholastic achievement, hyperactivity, irritability or anxious dysphoria, and problems of attention [8, 9]. However, it is not clear whether the neuropsychiatric complications of thyrotoxicosis (whether in children or adults) follow a course parallel to the resolution of thyrotoxicosis or remain the same even after achievement of normal thyroid hormone levels with ATDs or thyroidectomy.

This study aimed to: (1) analyze behavior of children and adolescents with GD during periods of thyroid hormone elevation (active disease) and normalized thyroid hormones with ATDs. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was used to assess behavior, and (2) study the independent demographic, clinical and laboratory variables which were associated with behavioral problems during periods of active disease and normalized thyroid hormones after one year of treatment with ATDs.

Methods

Thirty five children and adolescents (girls = 25; boys = 10) with confirmed diagnosis of GD were included in this prospective study. Their age ranged from 9 to 18 years. Patients were recruited and followed over a period of two years (2017–2019) from the Clinical Medicine multidisciplinary follow-up out-patient clinic of Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. The diagnostic criteria for GD included the presence of clinical hyperthyroidism and reduced thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and elevated free thyroxine (fT4) and triiodothyronine (fT3) blood concentrations, and high titers of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAbs) [10]. According to thyroid hormone status, children with GD were divided into: (1) those with active GD (i.e. newly diagnosed and did not previously receive ATDs], and (2) those with normal thyroid hormone levels (i.e. maintained in normalized thyroid state by ATDs for one year). Patients were treated with carbimazole in a dose of 0.5–0.7 mg/kg/day which was subsequently titrated to maintain normal thyroid hormone levels based on the results of serum thyroid hormone testing during follow-ups [11]. Also this study included 40 healthy children and adolescents matched for sex (girls = 20; boys = 20), age (range: 9–18 yrs; mean: 12.54 ± 1.62 yrs), pubertal status and educational and socioeconomic states. They were recruited from healthy schoolmates. Excluded from the study were children with: (1) mental developmental delay (i.e. intelligence quotient or IQ below 85) [12, 13], (2) other medical, systemic or autoimmune diseases, (3) previous relapse(s), (4) previous history of psychiatric disorders or brain insults, and (5) history of regular intake of B-blockers or psychotropic medications during the period of the study.

All patients underwent medical, endocrinology and neurological histories and examinations. The following data were collected: age at presentation, age of onset, duration and manifestations of GD, dose and duration of treatment with ATD(s) and duration of normalized thyroid hormone levels’ state. Anthropometric measurements (height and weight), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded.

Neurobehavioral assessment

Assessment of intelligence

Intelligence was assessed using Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition (WISC-III) [13]. The scale consists of 6 verbal subtests (verbal IQ) (similarities, digit span, vocabulary, arithmetic, comprehension, and information) and five performance subtests (performance IQ) (picture completion and arrangement, coding subtest, digit symbol, and block design).

Behavioral assessment

Interviewing of parents and children were done by the psychiatrists (FAA and MF). Child Behavior Check List (CBCL/6-18) was used for screening of emotions and behavior [14, 15]. Rating for different emotional, behavioral and social problems were defined by children’s parents as either not true (0), somewhat or sometimes true (1), or very true or often true (2). Problem Checklist of CBCL (demonstrated as 112 statements) are classified into 3 subscales: (1) The narrow-band syndrome scales have 8 items [Anxious/Depressed, Withdrawn/Depressed and Somatic Complaints; Social, Thought and Attention Problems; and Rule-Breaking and Aggressive Behaviors], (2) Broad-band internalizing [Anxious/Depressed, Withdrawn/Depressed and Somatic Complaints; and Social and Thought Problems] and externalizing [Attention Problems; Rule-Breaking and Aggressive Behavior] problems, and (3) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) scales [anxiety, oppositional defiant and attention deficit disorders and affective, somatic and conduct problems]. CBCL/6-18 scores can be used as continuous variables or according to total scoring ranges. According to the total scoring ranges, children were classified as: (1) normal (score = 50–64), (2) borderline (score = 65–69) or (3) abnormal (score = 70–100).

Laboratory testing

Blood was withdrawn at nearly 8 a.m. after overnight fasting for determination of serum concentrations of thyroid hormones (Immulite™ 2000 Third Generation, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). Reference ranges for ’thyroid function tests are as follow: TSH: 0.4–4.0 mU/L, fT4: 10.0–26.0 pmol/L, and fT3: 3.5–5.5 pmol/L. Blood TRAbs concentrations were measured using 3rd generation TBII assay (TRAb3rd) (Elecsys, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany). The reference cut-off value for positive concentration of TRAbs is 1.75 IU/L.

Statistical analyses

Analysis was done using SPSS version 16.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc, Chicago III). The distribution of data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) as they had continuous distribution. Comparative statistics were done using Student’s t- (two-tailed) and Chi-square tests. For each group (in the active and drug-corrected states), correlation analyses between total scoring of CBCL and variables (age at presentation and ’’at presentation" concentrations of TSH, fT4, fT3 and TRAbs) were done using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. For each group, multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between total scoring of CBCL (dependent variable) and age at presentation and ’’at presentation" concentrations of TSH, fT4, fT3 and TRAbs (independent variables) in the active and drug-corrected states. Two models were examined; model A was adjusted for age at presentation and model B was additionally adjusted for concentrations of TSH, fT4, fT3 and TRAbs. The β value, 95% confidence intervals percentage (CI %) and significances were calculated. Significance was considered as probability less than 0.05 (P<0.05).

Ethics statement

The ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine of Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt approved the study protocol (ID# AUFM_243/2017). Parents/guardians gave their written inform consents to participate in the study.

Results

Thirty five children with GD were included in this study (boys to girls ratio = 1: 2.5). They had mean age of 11.45 ± 1.50 yrs. All had normal neurological examinations and IQs. There were no differences between children ’with drug-corrected state and healthy children in thyroid laboratory markers (TSH, fT3, fT4 and TRAbs) (Table 1). Compared to healthy children, children with GD (whether in active or drug-corrected states) had higher total scoring of CBCL (P = 0.01; P = 0.04) particularly in Anxious/Depressed (P = 0.02; P = 0.04), Withdrawn/Depressed (P = 0.03; P = 0.04) and Attention (P = 0.01; P = 0.01) Problems subscales’. No differences were identified between children with GD and healthy children in scores of Rule-Breaking and Aggressive Behaviors (Table 2). There were overlaps of different behavioral problems (i.e. at least 2 problems) in the majority of children with active and normalized thyroid hormone levels’ states (particularly with active state). Higher frequencies of patients classified as at or above the borderline clinical stage for CBCL, were observed in children with active and normalized thyroid hormone levels’ states particularly with active state (P = 0.001) (Table 3). In the two groups of patients, correlation analyses showed that total scoring of CBCL was correlated with age at onset (r = -0.355, P = 0.01; r = -0.506, P = 0.001), "at presentation" lower concentrations of TSH (r = -0.655, P = 0.001; r = 0.258, P = 0.04) and higher concentrations of fT4 (r = 0.432, P = 0.01; r = 0.306, P = 0.02), fT3 (r = 0.446, P = 0.01; r = 0.280, P = 0.03) and TRAbs (r = 0.663, P = 0.001; r = 0.320, P = 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that "at presentation" lower concentrations of TSH (P = 0.001; P = 0.03) and higher fT4 (P = 0.001, P = 0.01), fT3 (P = 0.01; P = 0.06) and TRAbs (P = 0.001; P = 0.001) were predictors of behavioral problems in children with active as well as normalized thyroid hormone levels states (Table 4).

Table 1. The demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the studied groups.

Demographic, Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics Patients with active GD Patients in normalized thyroid hormone levels Controls
(n = 35) (n = 35) (n = 40)
Demographic and Clinical Data
Age at presentation; yrs 9–18 (11.45 ± 1.50) - 8–18 (12.54 ± 1.62)
P1-value 0.323 -
Gender
Girls 25 (71.43%) 25 (71.43%) 20 (50%)
Boys 10 (28.57%) 10 (28.57%) 20 (50%)
Heart rate; beats/minute 90–130 (110.00 ± 3.00) 80–100 (90.00 ± 5.00) 75–105 (85.00 ± 5.00)
P1-value 0.03 0.325
P2-value 0.01
Systolic blood pressure; mmHg 100–130 (110.00 ± 5.00) 90–110 (100.00 ± 0.00) 95–110 (100.00 ± 5.00)
P1-value 0.211 1.003
P2-value 0.212
Diastolic blood pressure; mmHg 60–80 (70.00 ± 0.00) 60–75 (65.00 ± 5.00) 55–80 (65.00 ± 0.00)
P1-value 0.456 1.002
P2-value 0.864
Body Mass Index; kg/m2 16–25 (18.90 ± 4.30) 18.5–26.9 (22.50 ± 2.30) 18.5–28.9 (24.9 ± 2.30)
P1-value 0.135 0.426
P2-value
Laboratory Data
TSH; μU/l 0.005–0.22 (0.01 ± 0.006) 0.37–3.55 (1.32 ± 0.45) 0.62–4.42 (1.75 ± 0.86)
P1-value 0.0001 0.345
P2-value 0.0001
fT4; pmol/l 24.30–46.52(32.10 ± 2.68) 7.25–16.33 (12.86 ± 1.36) 7.54–14.96 (11.46 ± 1.45)
P1-value 0.520
P2-value 0.0001 0.0001
fT3; pmol/l 15.45–29.68 (19.45 ± 2.70) 4.60–9.2 (5.50 ± 0.80) 3.80–7.80 (5.26 ± 1.06)
P1-value 0.866
P2-value 0.0001 0.0001
TRAb; IU/ml 180.60–470.37 (265.74 ± 55.86) 22.65–80.40 (42.36 ± 8.55) 16.88–64.25 (46.45 ± 6.60)
P1-value 0.688
P2-value 0.0001 0.0001
Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
Verbal IQ 80–130 (100.90 ± 10.28) 80–140 (102.70 ± 15.60) 90–145 (112.60 ± 18.55)
P1-value 0.345 0.433
P2-value 0.864
Performance IQ 70–135 (98.14 ± 12.33) 70–145 (99.19 ± 13.58) 86–132 (108.87 ± 15.60)
P1-value 0.235 0.268
P2-value 0.824
Full scale IQ 70–135 (101.18 ± 15.31) 75–137 (100.06 ± 12.52) 80–133 (105.90 ± 9.93)
P1-value 0.632 0.636
P2-value 1.022

Data are expressed as mean ± SD; number (%).

P1: significance versus controls; P2: significance versus those with active GD.

TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; fT4: free thyroxine; fT3: free triiodothyronine; TRAbs, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies.

Table 2. Behavioral assessment categorization and scores for the studied groups.

Behavioral assessment Patients with active GD Patients in normalized thyroid hormone levels Controls
(n = 35) (n = 35) (n = 40)
Anxious/Depressed 50–85 (74.37 ± 3.61) 50–88 (68.03 ± 2.57) 50–63 (55.42 ± 2.97)
P1-value 0.02 0.04
P2-value 0.258
Withdrawn/Depressed 50–89 (68.90 ± 3.33) 50–94 (66.90 ± 3.58) 50–76 (53.40 ± 4.43)
P1-value 0.03 0.04
P2-value 0.655
Somatic Complaints 50–80 (68.57 ± 4.16) 50–84 (60.12 ± 5.81) 50–79 (54.57 ± 5.45)
P1-value 0.03 0.127
P2-value 0.264
Social Problems 50–98 (70.97 ± 5.69) 50–91 (60.72 ± 5.89) 50–70 (52.13 ± 3.53)
P1-value 0.01 0.225
P2-value 0.320
Thought Problems 51–97 (72.10 ± 3.82) 50–90 (62.33 ± 3.84) 50–67 (52.73 ± 4.33)
P1-value 0.01 0.128
P2-value 0.256
Attention Problems 52–100 (73.03 ± 6.76) 50–95 (72.44 ± 5.08) 50–81 (52.12 ± 4.93)
P1-value 0.01 0.01
P2-value 0.657
Rule-Breaking Behavior 50–68 (56.00 ± 2.57) 50–76 (55.74 ± 2.98) 50–68 (54.12 ± 3.78)
P1-value 0.355 0.332
P2-value 0.724
Aggressive Behavior 50–100 (57.31 ± 8.70) 50–79 (53.03 ± 6.43) 50–70 (53.48 ± 3.69)
P1-value 0.440 0.678
P2-value 0.545
Total score 50–100 (70.53 ± 4.11) 50–95 (64.85 ± 5.36) 50–81 (51.33 ± 4.20)
P1-value 0.01 0.04
P2-value 0.625

Data were expressed as Mean ± SD.

Comparative statistics were done using Student’s-t-test.

P1: patients versus controls; P2: patients with active GD versus those in normalized thyroid hormone levels.

Table 3. Frequency of patients at or above the borderline clinical range for CBCL.

Behavioral assessment Patients with active GD state Patients with normalized thyroid hormone levels state P-value
(n = 35) (n = 35)
Anxious/Depressed 26 (74.29%) 15 (42.86%) 0.01
Withdrawn/Depressed 11 (31.43%) 8 (22.86%) 0.08
Somatic Complaints 20 (57.14%) 15 (42.86%) 0.04
Social Problems 18 (51.43%) 8 (22.86%) 0.01
Thought Problems 15 (42.86%) 8 (22.86%) 0.01
Attention Problems 26 (74.29%) 13 (37.14%) 0.001
Rule-Breaking Behavior 11.43%)) 4 5.71%))2 0.208
Aggressive Behavior 17.14%)) 6 3 (8.57%) 0.06
Total score 26 (74.29%) 11 (31.43%) 0.001

Data are expressed as number (%).

P: significance with active thyrotoxicosis versus in remission.

Table 4. Regression analysis for variables which predict behavioral problems.

Children with active GD
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig 95% Confidence Interval for B
B SE β Lower Bound Upper Bound
Constant 1.763 0.402 - 5.260 0.001 0.688 2.345
TSH 0.346 0.128 0.350 3.258 0.001 0.248 0.620
fT4 0.460 0.205 0.352 3.520 0.001 0.246 0.845
fT3 0.255 0.152 0.280 2.632 0.01 0.184 0.472
TRAbs 0.526 0.185 0.408 3.526 0.001 0.345 0.860
Children in normalized thyroid hormone levels
Constant 1.624 0.326 - 4.346 0.001 0.456 2.530
TSH 0.322 0.138 0.320 2.356 0.03 0.268 0.562
fT4 0.328 0.184 0.220 1.520 0.01 0.238 0.625
fT3 0.246 0.128 0.152 1.824 0.06 0.145 0.526
TRAbs 0.433 0.256 0.368 3.228 0.001 0.265 0.625

TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; fT4: free thyroxine; fT3: free triiodothyronine; TRAbs, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies.

Discussion

The emotional state and behavior of children and adolescents with GD were prospectively assessed during the periods of active disease and normalized thyroid hormone levels’ with AEDs. Results of this study indicate that: (1) High frequencies of patients with active GD (74.29%) or normalized thyroid hormone levels’ (31.43%) had high total scoring of CBCL particularly its Anxious/Depressed, Withdrawn/Depressed; and Somatic Complaints and Social, Thought and Attention Problems subscales, indicating internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems. (2) Marked improvement was observed after normalization of thyroid hormone levels with ATDs. (3) Anxiety and inattention were the prominent behavioral manifestations both during the active and normalized thyroid hormone levels’ states. (4) Behavioral problems seem to be independently related to the severity of GD.

In accordance, in adults with hyperthyroidism, authors observed incomplete normalization of psychopathological and neuropsychological changes after longer periods of normalization of thyroid hormone levels [46, 16, 17]. Bommer et al. [16] observed that adults with "subclinical" or "remitted" hyperthyroidism (n = 45) had the following: (a) more behavioral abnormalities which included reduced well-being with feelings of fear (43% versus 10% for controls), hostility, inability to concentrate, fearful-agitated syndrome (dominated mainly early at onset of the disease) and depression (dominated mainly after longer periods of normalized thyroid hormone levels), and (b) marked impairment of neuropsychological functioning particularly in relapse after 2.5 yrs (more than 25% versus 2% for controls). Paschke et al. [17] found significant reduction in anxiety, irritability, depression, exhaustion, ability to concentrate, extroversion and introversion manifestations and reduced well-being in adults with thyrotoxicosis after 1 to 2 months of achievement of normal thyroid hormone levels with ATDs or thyroidectomy. However, they observed that patients had never returned to baseline before the disease onset. Stern et al. [4] reported the following: (a) subclinical cognitive deficits (manifested as slow mental function) in 24% of subjects for a period of 2 years after the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism till the appearance of clinical symptoms of GD; (b) altered personality and mood or emotional functioning (manifested as depression, mood swings, anxiety and panic attacks) in 37%; and (c) somatic complaints (50%). The authors also observed that one third of patients received psychotropic medications after being diagnosed with GD and the majority had worse cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms after achievement of peripheral normalized thyroid hormone levels compared to their baseline (i.e. before the onset of thyrotoxicosis). Scheffer et al. [5] studied females with the diagnosis of GD for five years and had normal thyroid hormone levels for ≤6 months before the study period. The authors observed the following: (a) high mean scoring values of Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R), (b) psychological distress in 35.6% of patients [according to the Global Severity Index (GSI)], (c) higher scores in anxiety subscale [according to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale or HADS], and (d) higher relapse rates with higher scores of psychological distress (GSI more than 60). Vogel et al. [6] did a prospective study on adults (n = 31) who were newly diagnosed with GD and did not receive treatment yet. The authors observed the following: (a) higher scores of psychiatric rating scales, memory and concentration problems but not in neuropsychological test performances at baseline (untreated state), (b) no correlation between thyroid hormone levels and the neuropsychological test performances or psychiatric ratings at baseline; and (c) significant reduction of affective and somatic manifestations after reaching normal thyroid hormone levels and further normalization after ATD(s) treatment for one year, The authors concluded that the detected cognitive deficits might be the cause of the observed affective and somatic manifestations.

Furthermore, psychopathological and neuropsychological changes have been observed in adults with subclinical hyperthyroidism. Röckel et al. [18] observed anxiety, emotional irritability, depression, fatigability and lack of energy, poor attention and concentration in patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism similar to those with overt hyperthyroidism. Schlote et al. [19] observed the following: (a) increased frequency of anxiety symptoms and manifestations of hypermetabolic state in adults with subclinical hyperthyroidism (n = 35) compared to healthy subjects (n = 28), (b) similar manifestations of psychomotor impairment, hypermetabolic state and self-rating affective state in adults with subclinical hyperthyroidism as those with overt hyperthyroidism (n = 60), and (c) differences in the ability to concentrate and short-term memory among the three groups (i.e. subclinical hyperthyroidism, overt hyperthyroidism and healthy subjects).

The mechanisms underlying the development of psychiatric manifestations in GD and other causes of hyperthyroidism are not known. Studies indicated that psychological symptoms associated with hyperthyroidism are similar to those of primary anxiety and anxious depressive disorder (i.e. there are no specific or unique psychosomatic patterns in patients with hyperthyroidism). Therefore, psychological symptoms with hyperthyroidism might be related to: the biological consequence of autoimmunity, metabolic disorder of thyrotoxicosis and/or the associated neurotransmitter changes [17, 20, 21]. This is supported by the following: (1) the hippocampus and amygdala, brain regions involved in behavior, mood, and long-term memory have large number of thyroid hormone receptors [21]. (2) thyroid hormones have multiple actions, including: (a) modulation of noradrenergic (i.e. beta-adrenergic response to catecholamines in the central nervous system), serotonergic, and dopaminergic receptors’ functions. (b) influencing effect on second messenger, calcium homeostasis and morphology of neuronal axons and their transport mechanisms. Animal studies reported that thyroxine increases serotonin (5HT2) receptors in the hippocampus and striatum [22]. (3) thyroid releasing hormone (TRH) is a neurotransmitter in the autonomic nervous system (ANS). It has also been found in peripheral lymphocytes [23]. Therefore, it is possible that hyperthyroidism may alter neurotransmitters’ activities as monoamines, serotonin and dopamine in the limbic system resulting in neuropsychiatric manifestations [21]. This is also supported by the following: (a) Studies identified significant correlation between abnormal T4/T8 ratio and high scores of anxiety and depression in patients with GD [17]. (b) Studies observed that the duration and severity of thyrotoxicosis were the main determinants for behavioral complications [24]. (4) Studies observed that similar to patients with different systemic autoimmune diseases, psychiatric symptoms linked to thyrotoxicosis may occur earlier during the course of the disease or even before the diagnosis of integral hypermetabolic symptoms. In some adults, authors observed obvious neuropsychiatric symptoms antedating the clinical diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis by 6–12 months [17, 25, 26]. (5) studies found 45% increase in the risk for schizophrenia with the presence of any autoimmune disease [27]. On the other hand, higher prevalence rates of autoimmune diseases [e.g. autoimmune diseases included rheumatoid arthritis, celiac disease, autoimmune thyroid diseases, thyrotoxicosis, insulin dependent diabetes, acquired hemolytic anemia, interstitial cystitis, and Sjögren’s syndrome] were reported in patients with schizophrenia with crude incidence rate ratios ranging from 1.9 to 12.5. They also found adjusted incidence rate ratios of autoimmune diseases ranged from 1.3 to 3.8 in parents of patients with schizophrenia. (6) thyroxine and TRH are used successfully for treatment of major depression [28]. However, some recent studies and reviews showed controversial evidence [29]. (7) the occurrence of stress may play a role in evocation of psychiatric symptoms in genetically vulnerable patients with thyrotoxicosis [20, 28, 29]. In accordance, Morillo and Gardner [28] reported that the onset of relapse of GD in four children (8–14 years) (HLA B-8) was induced by depression as a common response to loss. The authors suggested that depression may result in the following: (a) suppression of immunity, (b) depletion of central nervous system monoamines, (c) activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and (d) formation of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins.

Therefore, it is necessary to: (1) identify the systemic autoimmune diseases earlier and treat them adequately, (2) increase the awareness of specialists with the neuropsychiatric complications of thyrotoxicosis, (3) recommend repeated psychological testing for children and adolescents with GD, and (4) individualize psychotropic therapy.

The strengths of the study

The strengths of the study are (1) the pursuit of behavioral symptomatology in a previously unstudied population, and (2) The prospective nature of the study.

Limitations of the study

We realize that the main limitation of this study is small sample size and the recruitment of patients from a single tertiary center may result in selection bias for severe cases. Future prospective studies with large sample size are recommended.

Conclusions

This study indicates that children and adolescents with GD are at higher risk of behavioral symptoms even with normalized thyroid hormone levels after anti-thyroid drug therapy. Anxiety/Depression and inattention were the commonly associated behavioral symptoms with GD, indicating presence of externalizing and internalizing problems. The presence of behavioral changes during the active as well as normalized thyroid hormone levels’ states (now euthyroid) highly suggests a biopsychological mechanism. Earlier diagnosis, optimizing management of GD and early screening for behavioral symptoms are important to improve patients’ social life.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because they contain potentially sensitive information. Data are available from the ethics committee of Faculty of Medicine, Assiut, University (medicinegraduate@aun.edu.eg).

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Zimmerman D, Lteif AN. Thyrotoxicosis in children. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27(1):109–26. 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70302-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lavard L, Ranlov I, Perrild H, Andersen O, Jacobsen BB. Incidence of juvenile thyrotoxicosis in Denmark, 1982–1988 A nationwide study. Eur J Endocrinol. 1994;130(6):565–8. 10.1530/eje.0.1300565 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Hegedüs L. Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves’ disease: a population-based study of two Danish twin cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;130(6):565–8. 10.1210/jcem.86.2.7242 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stern RA, Robinson B, Thorner AR, Arruda JE, Prohaska ML, Prange AJ Jr. A survey study of neuropsychiaric complaints in patients with Graves’ disease J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1996,8(2):181–5. 10.1176/jnp.8.2.181 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scheffer C, Heckmann C, Mijic T, Rudorff KH. Chronic distress syndrome in patients with Graves’ disease. Med. Klin. (Munich). 2004;99(10):578–84. 10.1007/s00063-004-1089-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vogel A, Elberling TV, Hørding M, Dock J, Rasmussen AK, Feldt-Rasmussen U, et al. Affective symptoms and cognitive functions in the acute phase of Graves’ thyrotoxicosis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32(1):36–43. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.09.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Trzepacz PT, McCue M, Klein I, Levey GS, Greenhouse J. A psychiatric and neuropsychological study of patients with untreated Graves’ disease. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1988;10(1):49–55. 10.1016/0163-8343(88)90084-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boiko J, Leger J, Raux-Demay MC, Cabrol S, Le Bouc Y, Czernichow P. Basedow disease in children: clinical and evolutive aspects. Arch Pediatr. 1998;5(7):722–30. 10.1016/s0929-693x(98)80052-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zimmerman D, Gan-Gaisano M. Hyperthyroidism in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;37(6):1273–95. 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)37011-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weetman AP. Grave’s disease 1835–2002. Horm Res. 2003; 59(Suppl 1):114–8. 10.1159/000067837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lippe BM, Landaw EM, Kaplan SA. Hyperthyroidism in children treated with long term medical therapy: twenty-five percent normalized thyroid hormone levels every two years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64(6):1241–5. 10.1210/jcem-64-6-1241 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wechsler DI. Examiner’s Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition. Psychological Corporation: New York, NY. 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ismael M, Malika L. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC): the Arabic version. Egypt Anglo Library. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Achenbach TM. Child behavior checklist and 1991 profiles for children and adolescents. USA: Department of Psychiatry, Vermont University. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koura MR. Study of the role of Alexandria primary health care program in assessment of behavioral disorder in primary school children (thesis), Alexandria, Egypt. Alexandria University High Institute of Public Health; 1991. http://doi.org./10.13140/RG.2.2.35107.71200
  • 16.Bommer M, Eversmann T, Pickardt R, Leonhardt A, Naber D. Psychopathological and neuropsychological symptoms in patients with subclinical and remitted hyperthyroidism. Klin Wochenschr. 1990;68(11):552–8. 10.1007/BF01667147 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paschke R, Harsch I, Schlote B, Vardali I, Schaaf L, Kaumeier S, et al. Sequential psychological testing during the course of autoimmune hyperthyroidism. Klin Wochenschr. 1990;68(19):942–50. 10.1007/BF01646652 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Röckel M, Teuber J, Schmidt R, Kaumeier S, Häfner H, Usadel KH. Correlation of "latent hyperthyroidism" with psychological and somatic changes. Klin Wochenschr. 1987;65(6):264–73. 10.1007/BF01773447 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schlote B, Nowotny B, Schaaf L, Kleinböhl D, Schmidt R, Teuber J, et al. Subclinical hyperthyroidism: physical and mental state of patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 241(6):357–64. 10.1007/BF02191961 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bunevicius R, Prange AJ. Psychiatric manifestations of Graves’ hyperthyroidism: pathophysiology and treatment options. CNS Drugs. 2006;20(11):897–909. 10.2165/00023210-200620110-00003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Draganić-Gajić S, Lecić-Tosevski D, Svrakić D, Paunovic VR, Cvejić V, Cloninger R. Psychosomatic concept of hyperthyroidism-Graves type—behavioral and biochemical characteristics. Med Pregl. 2008;61(7–8):383–8. 10.2298/mpns0808383d . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berumen LC, Rodríguez A, Miledi R, García-Alcocer G. Serotonin receptors in the hippocampus. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:823493. 10.1100/2012/823493 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Quintanar JL, Guzmán-Soto I. Hypothalamic neurohormones and immune responses. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience. 2013;7:56. eCollection 2013 10.3389/fnint.2013.00056 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gagliardi JP, Clary GL. Treatment of thyrotoxicosis-induced psychosis. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 2002;36(4):7–13. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brownlie BE, Rae AM, Walshe JW, Wells JE. Psychoses associated with thyrotoxicosis—’thyrotoxic psychosis.’ A report of 18 cases, with statistical analysis of incidence. Eur. Endocrinol. 2000;142(5):438–44. 10.1530/eje.0.1420438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ogbera AO, Fasanmade O, Adediran O. Pattern of thyroid disorders in the southwestern region of Nigeria Ethn Dis. 2007;17(2);327–30. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eaton WW, Byrne M, Ewald H, Mors O, Chen CY, Agerbo E, et al. Association of schizophrenia and autoimmune diseases: linkage of Danish national registers. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2006;163(3):521–8. 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.521 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morillo E, Gardner LI. Bereavement as an antecedent factor in thyrotoxicosis of childhood: four case studies with survey of possible metabolic pathways. Psychosom. Med. 1979;41(7):545–55. 10.1097/00006842-197911000-00005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trifu S, Popescu A, Dragoi AM, Trifu AI. Thyroid hormones as a third line of augmentation medication in treatment-resistant depression. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2020;16(2):256–261. 10.4183/aeb.2020.256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Melissa A Brotman

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

6 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-38682

Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hamed,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 14 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Melissa A Brotman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you very much for your manuscript to PLOS ONE. We have secured a review who saw great merits with the manuscript, but also raised some concerns, which are noted below. We encourage you to address the comments and submit a revised version. Thank you again for submitting to PLOS ONE.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. This report describes behavior in children with Graves disease prior to treatment with antithyroid drugs and following such treatment. Behavior is assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist.

2. The authors refer to the period during which the children with Graves disease are treated with anti-thyroid drugs as the 'remission state.' This description is misleading since 'remission' is commonly used to describe the phase of Graves disease in which treatment is not required as a result of decreased production of thyroid stimulating immunoglobulins or as a result of concurrent thyroiditis rendering the thyroid gland unable to respond to these stimulating immunoglobulins. A preferable term to describe normalization of thyroid hormone levels resulting from antithyroid drug therapy is 'normalized thyroid hormone levels.'

3. There are three occurrences in the manuscript in which the authors erroneously describe hyperthyroidism as 'hyperparathyroidism' :first and fifth sentences of the Introduction and third paragraph of the Discussion. Parathyroid hormone is produced by parathyroid glands (which are close to the thyroid gland. Parathyroid hormone regulates circulating levels of calcium and phosphorus.) This distinction is particularly important since parathyroid hormone excess can be associated with abnormal brain function.

4. Under 'Methods,' the second sentence should read: 'Their age ranged...'

5. Under 'Methods' in the first paragraph, third sentence: best to use the spelling 'thyroxine' rather than 'thyroxin'

6. Under 'Methods' in the first paragraph, fourth sentence: instead of 'thyroid hormone state' use 'thyroid hormone status.'

7. In the next sentence under 'Methods,' '(2) those in remission (ie, maintained in euthyroid state' best to spell euthyroid as above instead of 'euothyroid.' In addition best to refer to this state as normalized thyroid state' rather than as 'euthyroid.' The next sentence also has 'euthyroid' misspelled as 'euothyroid.'

8. Under 'Exclusion Criteria': the authors should consider including children with Graves ophthalmopathy since this condition should not confound findings in the WISC-III or in the CBCL/8-18.

9. Under 'Laboratory Testing': TSH should not be included under the term 'thyroid hormones.' Best to refer to all of these tests as 'thyroid function tests.'

10. Under 'Statistical analyses' eighth line--do not refer to status during treatment with antithyroid drugs as 'remission state.' Better to use 'drug-corrected state.'

11. In first paragraph under 'Results' and in first 2 paragraphs under 'Discussion': do not refer to drug-corrected state as 'remission.'

12. In second paragraph of the discussion, the authors should substitute 'normalized thyroid

thyroid hormone levels' for 'euthyroid state.'

13. In the first line on page 10 (part of the Discussion), the last word should be 'following' rather than 'followings.'

14. In second line on page 10: ' There are a large number...'

15. The authors refer to thyroid hormones as accepted treatment for depression. Recent studies and reviews question this. The authors should provide a recent reference supporting this practice.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Donald Zimmerman, MD

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0248937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248937.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Jan 2021

We are grateful to the reviewers for the valuable and helpful editor's and reviewers' comments on our manuscript ID # [PONE-S-20-48013] with the title "Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study" submitted as an original article wishing to be published in Plos One. We have addressed all comments (point-by-point), as indicated in the attached pages and considered their corrections within the main text. We hope that the explanations and revisions of our work are satisfactory. We have highlighted the changes in the revised manuscript (yellow color).

Response to reviewer's # 1 comments

Reviewer:

1- This report describes behavior in children with Graves disease prior to treatment with antithyroid drugs and following such treatment. Behavior is assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist.

2- The authors refer to the period during which the children with Graves disease are treated with anti-thyroid drugs as the 'remission state.' This description is misleading since 'remission' is commonly used to describe the phase of Graves disease in which treatment is not required as a result of decreased production of thyroid stimulating immunoglobulins or as a result of concurrent thyroiditis rendering the thyroid gland unable to respond to these stimulating immunoglobulins. A preferable term to describe normalization of thyroid hormone levels resulting from antithyroid drug therapy is 'normalized thyroid hormone levels.'

Author:

We used the preferable term "normalized thyroid hormone levels state" instead of "in remission" whenever cited throughout the text.

Reviewer:

3. There are three occurrences in the manuscript in which the authors erroneously describe hyperthyroidism as 'hyperparathyroidism': first and fifth sentences of the Introduction and third paragraph of the Discussion. Parathyroid hormone is produced by parathyroid glands (which are close to the thyroid gland. Parathyroid hormone regulates circulating levels of calcium and phosphorus.) This distinction is particularly important since parathyroid hormone excess can be associated with abnormal brain function.

Author:

They have been edited correctly

Reviewer:

4. Under 'Methods,' the second sentence should read: 'Their age ranged...'

Author:

It has been edited correctly

Reviewer:

5. Under 'Methods' in the first paragraph, third sentence: best to use the spelling 'thyroxine' rather than 'thyroxin'

Author:

We have replaced the term "thyroxin" with "thyroxine" throughout the manuscript text.

Reviewer:

6. Under 'Methods' in the first paragraph, fourth sentence: instead of 'thyroid hormone state' use 'thyroid hormone status.'

Author:

It has been edited.

Reviewer:

7. In the next sentence under 'Methods,' '(2) those in remission (ie, maintained in euthyroid state' best to spell euthyroid as above instead of 'euothyroid.' In addition best to refer to this state as normalized thyroid state' rather than as 'euthyroid.' The next sentence also has 'euthyroid' misspelled as 'euothyroid.'

Author:

We replaced euothyroid by "normalized thyroid state".

Reviewer:

8. Under 'Exclusion Criteria': the authors should consider including children with Graves ophthalmopathy since this condition should not confound findings in the WISC-III or in the CBCL/8-18.

Author:

- None of the recruited children had Ophthalmopathy

- We revised the text of "previous relapse or presence of Graves Ophthalmopathy," into "previous relapse,"

Reviewer:

9. Under 'Laboratory Testing': TSH should not be included under the term 'thyroid hormones.' Best to refer to all of these tests as 'thyroid function tests.'

Author:

We have revised it as thyroid function tests

Reviewer:

10. Under 'Statistical analyses' eighth line--do not refer to status during treatment with antithyroid drugs as 'remission state.' Better to use 'drug-corrected state.'

Author:

We have revised it as 'drug-corrected

Reviewer:

11. In first paragraph under 'Results' and in first 2 paragraphs under 'Discussion': do not refer to drug-corrected state as 'remission.'

Author:

We have done and wherever found, we replace in remission by drug-corrected.

Reviewer:

12. In second paragraph of the discussion, the authors should substitute 'normalized thyroid

thyroid hormone levels' for 'euthyroid state.'

Author:

We have substituted it by "normalized thyroid hormone levels"

Reviewer:

13. In the first line on page 10 (part of the Discussion), the last word should be 'following' rather than 'followings.'

Author:

It has been edited

Reviewer:

14. In second line on page 10: ' There are a large number...'

Author:

We have edited it.

Reviewer:

15. The authors refer to thyroid hormones as accepted treatment for depression. Recent studies and reviews question this. The authors should provide a recent reference supporting this practice.

Author:

Page 10 and 11:

This has been revised as follow and we provided a recent reference supporting this practice as follow:

"(6) Thyroxine and TRH are used successfully for treatment of major depression [29,30]. However, some recent studies and reviews showed controversial evidence [31]."

Trifu S, Popescu A, Dragoi AM, Trifu AI. Thyroid hormones as a third line of augmentation medication in treatment-resistant depression. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2020;16(2):256-261. http://doi.org./10.4183/aeb.2020.256. PMID: 33029246

Reviewer:

Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Author:

The text of manuscript has been revised by a colleague who naive language is English.

With this manuscript, there are 4 tables which we wish to be published.

I certify that the materials of this work “Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study” have not been submitted simultaneously elsewhere and that there is no part of the text or any of the tables has been copyrighted, published, or reproduced elsewhere. I certify that all individuals included as authors of papers have contributed substantially to the scientific process leading up to the writing of the paper and its revised version.

Thank you for accepting reviewing our manuscript.

Decision Letter 1

Melissa A Brotman

10 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-38682R1

Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hamed,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 27 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Melissa A Brotman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. Abstract-1st sentence: Previous studies have...instead of

2. Abstract-second sentence: These studies are scarce [not scare]

3. Abstract -3rd sentence: This study aimed to STUDY [rather than 'determine.']

4. Abstract- The authors appear to associate worse outcomes with low TSH levels and then with higher TSH levels (both in abstract and in first paragraph of Results. Please explain these apparently contradictory findings.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Donald Zimmerman, MD

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0248937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248937.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


12 Feb 2021

We are grateful to the reviewers for the valuable and helpful editor's and reviewers' comments on our manuscript ID # [PONE-D-20-38682R1] with the title "Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study" submitted as an original article wishing to be published in Plos One. We have addressed all comments (point-by-point), as indicated in the attached pages and considered their corrections within the main text. We hope that the explanations and revisions of our work are satisfactory. We have highlighted the changes in the revised manuscript (yellow color).

Response to reviewer's # 1 comments

Reviewer:

1. Abstract-1st sentence: Previous studies have...instead of

Author:

It has been revised to "Previous studies have identified frequent…."

Reviewer:

2. Abstract-second sentence: These studies are scarce [not scare]

Author:

It has been corrected.

Reviewer:

3. Abstract -3rd sentence: This study aimed to STUDY [rather than 'determine.']

Author:

It has been revised as follow:

"This work aimed to study…."

Reviewer:

4. Abstract- The authors appear to associate worse outcomes with low TSH levels and then with higher TSH levels (both in abstract and in first paragraph of Results. Please explain these apparently contradictory findings.

Author:

This has been clarified as in the abstract as the results of the study as follow:

Abstract:

"Multiple linear regression analysis showed that lower concentrations of TSH (P=0.001; P=0.03) and higher fT4 (P=0.001, P=0.01), fT3 (P=0.01; P=0.06) and TRAbs (P=0.001; P=0.001) (at presentation)"

Results:

"Multiple linear regression analysis showed that "at presentation" lower concentrations of TSH (P=0.001; P=0.03) and higher fT4 (P=0.001, P=0.01), fT3 (P=0.01; P=0.06) and TRAbs (P=0.001; P=0.001) were predictors of behavioral problems in children with active GD and normalized thyroid hormone levels' states (table 4)."

Reviewer:

Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Author:

The text of manuscript has been revised by a colleague who naive language is English.

With this manuscript, there are 4 tables which we wish to be published.

I certify that the materials of this work “Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study” have not been submitted simultaneously elsewhere and that there is no part of the text or any of the tables has been copyrighted, published, or reproduced elsewhere. I certify that all individuals included as authors of papers have contributed substantially to the scientific process leading up to the writing of the paper and its revised version.

Thank you for accepting reviewing our manuscript.

Decision Letter 2

Melissa A Brotman

3 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-38682R2

Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hamed,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 17 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Melissa A Brotman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The manuscript is improved. Most of the problems which remain are related to language rather than to scientific issues.

2. Abstract Line 7: Instead of 'active and normalized thyroid hormone levels' states'---'during periods of thyroid hormone elevation and of normalized thyroid hormones.' Use these terms also in line 16. Similar verbiage should be used in line 4 and in the final paragraph of the introduction.

3.In 'Methods' section--line 3: omit comma between 'out-patient clinic' and and 'of Assiut University Hospital.'

4. 'Methods' section line 8:

(2) those with normal thyroid hormone levels

5. 'Methods' section line 10:

'...which was subsequently titrated to maintain normal thyroid hormone levels based on...'

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Donald Zimmerman, MD

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0248937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248937.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


4 Mar 2021

We are grateful to the valuable and helpful reviewers' and editor's comments on our manuscript ID # [PONE-D-20-38682R2] with the title "Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study" submitted as an original article wishing to be published in Plos One. We have addressed all comments (point-by-point), as indicated in the attached pages and considered their corrections within the main text. We hope that the explanations and revisions of our work are satisfactory. We have highlighted the changes in the revised manuscript (yellow color).

Response to Editor's comments

- The text of manuscript has been edited by a colleague who naive language is English.

- We have included this statement in your website related to Data Availability "Data cannot be shared publicly because they contain potentially sensitive information. Data are available from the ethics committee of Faculty of Medicine, Assiut, University (medicinegraduate@aun.edu.eg)".

Response to reviewer's # 1 comments

Reviewer:

1. The manuscript is improved. Most of the problems which remain are related to language rather than to scientific issues.

Author:

Reviewer:

2. Abstract Line 7: Instead of 'active and normalized thyroid hormone levels' states'---'during periods of thyroid hormone elevation and of normalized thyroid hormones.' Use these terms also in line 16. Similar verbiage should be used in line 4 and in the final paragraph of the introduction.

Author:

We have done the required corrections

Reviewer:

3. In 'Methods' section--line 3: omit comma between 'out-patient clinic' and and 'of Assiut University Hospital.'

Author:

It has been corrected.

Reviewer:

4. 'Methods' section line 8: (2) those with normal thyroid hormone levels

Author:

It has been corrected.

Reviewer:

5. 'Methods' section line 10: '...which was subsequently titrated to maintain normal thyroid hormone levels based on...'

Author:

It has been corrected.

With this manuscript, there are 4 tables which we wish to be published.

I certify that the materials of this work “Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study” have not been submitted simultaneously elsewhere and that there is no part of the text or any of the tables has been copyrighted, published, or reproduced elsewhere. I certify that all individuals included as authors of papers have contributed substantially to the scientific process leading up to the writing of the paper and its revised version.

Thank you for accepting reviewing our manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments R3.docx

Decision Letter 3

Melissa A Brotman

9 Mar 2021

Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study

PONE-D-20-38682R3

Dear Dr. Hamed,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Melissa A Brotman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Melissa A Brotman

11 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-38682R3

Behavioral assessment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease: A prospective study

Dear Dr. Hamed:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Melissa A Brotman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments R3.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because they contain potentially sensitive information. Data are available from the ethics committee of Faculty of Medicine, Assiut, University (medicinegraduate@aun.edu.eg).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES