Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0246710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246710

Comprehensive analysis of male-free reproduction in Monomorium triviale (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)

Naoto Idogawa 1,*, Tomonori Sasaki 2,3, Kazuki Tsuji 3, Shigeto Dobata 1,4,*
Editor: Nicolas Chaline5
PMCID: PMC8084239  PMID: 33914749

Abstract

We report comprehensive evidence for obligatory thelytokous parthenogenesis in an ant Monomorium triviale. This species is characterized by distinct queen–worker dimorphism with strict reproductive division of labor: queens produce both workers and new queens without mating, whereas workers are completely sterile. We collected 333 nests of this species from 14 localities and three laboratory-reared populations in Japan. All wild queens dissected had no sperm in their spermathecae. Laboratory observation confirmed that virgin queens produced workers without mating. Furthermore, microsatellite genotyping showed identical heterozygous genotypes between mothers and their respective daughters, suggesting an extremely low probability of sexual reproduction. Microbial analysis detected no bacterial genera that are known to induce thelytokous parthenogenesis in Hymenoptera. Finally, the lack of variation in partial sequences of mitochondrial DNA among individuals sampled from across Japan suggests recent rapid spread or selective sweep. M. triviale would be a promising model system of superorganism-like adaptation through comparative analysis with well-studied sexual congeners, including the pharaoh ant M. pharaonis.

Introduction

Hymenopteran insects are characterized by haplo-diploid sex determination systems, in which females are derived from fertilized diploid eggs and males are derived from unfertilized haploid eggs via arrhenotokous parthenogenesis [1]. However, the production of diploid females from unfertilized eggs—known as thelytokous parthenogenesis—has been reported sporadically across the Hymenoptera [2]. Thelytoky has provided an opportunity for empirical testing of evolutionary hypotheses to account for the near-ubiquity of sex among eukaryotes [3]. The last decade has seen an increasing number of known thelytokous Hymenoptera, especially in eusocial species [4]. In studies taking advantage of this simplified mode of reproduction, thelytokous social insects have been acknowledged as a model system in behavioral ecology (e.g., [58]) and sociogenomics (e.g., [9]).

Previous studies of thelytokous parthenogenesis of ants have identified three distinct categories [10, 11]: (type I) queens produce workers sexually but daughter queens via thelytoky; (type II) the queen caste is usually lost, males are absent, and workers produce workers via thelytoky; and (type III) queens produce both workers and queens via thelytoky, males are usually absent, and workers are sterile.

In this paper, we report comprehensive evidence of the third type of thelytokous parthenogenesis, namely obligatory thelytoky by queens of M. triviale [12]. The genus Monomorium is one of the most species-rich genera among ants [13] and has a worldwide distribution [14]. With the marked exception of tramp species such as the pharaoh ant M. pharaonis [15], most Monomorium species remain to be investigated [16]. M. triviale is reported from East Asia, encompassing Japan, South Korea and mainland China [14]. Neither males nor inseminated females have been found to date; this has been referred to in several studies [1, 4, 1723]. Surprisingly, however, direct evidence of thelytoky is lacking. We examined the reproductive system of M. triviale through multiple approaches, namely dissection of spermathecae of field-collected queens, direct observation of virgin queen reproduction, and microsatellite genotyping of mothers and daughters. Furthermore, we analyzed for the presence of parthenogenesis-inducing microsymbionts and within-species phylogenetic relationships among populations in Japan.

Materials & methods

Colony sampling

A total of 333 nests of M. triviale were collected from 14 local populations in Japan (Fig 1, Table 1). No specific permission for sampling was required. In the field, nests were found in small gaps in dead plant bodies such as rotten roots, dead twigs, hollow bamboo sticks, and acorns. Because of the small nest size (about 200 workers on average) it was easy to collect the whole nest. During the field investigation, males of M. triviale were never found. Colonies were transferred into artificial nests in the laboratory as soon as possible and were kept at 25°C until the following experiments. In addition, ethanol-preserved samples originating from three other sites were examined (Fig 1, nos. 15 to 17).

Fig 1. Localization of the 14 sampling sites (1 to 14) and the three sites of origin of laboratory-reared populations (15 to 17) in Japan.

Fig 1

Open circles indicate site locations. Site names, numbers of nests collected, and types of analyses are described in Table 1. Map data by Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/).

Table 1. Sampling sites of Monomorium triviale populations and experiments performed.

Locality Latitude Longitude Collection dates No. of nests Experiments
1 Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture 35.060087 135.788488 19/04/2017 to 27/11/2017 (24 times) 176 SP, VR, SEQ
2 Tsuchiura City, Ibaraki Prefecture 36.077927 140.165473 20/06/2017, 09/10/2018 28 SP, VR, SEQ
3 Chofu City, Tokyo Metropolis 35.668182 139.549061 16/06/2017, 27/09/2018 28 SP, VR, SEQ
4 Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture 36.100415 140.101297 19/06/2017, 08/10/2018 26 SP, VR, SEQ
5 Otsu City, Shiga Prefecture 34.970262 135.956026 10/06/2017 26 SP, VR, SEQ
6 Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture 35.774787 139.899362 18/06/2017, 28/09/2018 22 SP, VR, SEQ
7 Higashiosaka City, Osaka Prefecture 34.665748 135.671267 09/11/2017 5 SP, SEQ
8 Okazaki City, Aichi Prefecture 34.941529 137.175594 03/09/2017 1 SP, SEQ
9 Sanda City, Hyogo Prefecture 34.914575 135.165764 09/05/2017 1 VR, SEQ
10 Kaizu City, Gifu Prefecture 35.22 136.63 06/06/2018 1 SP
11 Tobishima Island, Sakata City, Yamagata Prefecture 39.19 139.55 20/09/2018 2 SP
12 Takamatsu City, Kagawa Prefecture 34.364349 134.098205 17/06/2017 16 SEQ
13 Matsuyama City, Ehime Prefecture 33.845539 132.765722 19/09/2018 2 SEQ
14 Takashima City, Shiga Prefecture 35.3677 135.9168 30/05/2017 1 SEQ
15 Kanonji City, Kagawa Prefecture 34.12 133.66 Reared in Laboratory SEQ
16 Kagamihara City, Gifu Prefecture 35.40 136.85 Reared in Laboratory SEQ
17 Matsue City, Shimane Prefecture 35.47 133.05 Reared in Laboratory SEQ
Total 333

The nests from Kaizu City (locality no. 10) and Tobishima Island (no. 11) were provided by Dr. K. Ohkawara. Samples from Higashiosaka City (no. 7) and Takashima City (no. 14) were provided by Mr. K. Sadahiro and Dr. T. Nozaki, respectively. Ethanol-preserved samples from Kanonji City, Kagamihara City, and Matsue City (nos. 15 to 17) were provided by Dr. F. Ito. Experiments on the samples from the 17 sites are abbreviated as follows: SP: Dissection of wild queens’ spermathecae; VR: Observation of virgin queen reproduction; SEQ: Phylogenetic analysis based on mtDNA sequencing.

Dissection of wild queens

To confirm the reproductive status of the queens from wild nests, we dissected 63 individuals from 38 nests of 10 M. triviale populations within 6 months after collection (Table 2). First the queen was immobilized by soaking in 70% ethanol for 3 min. The body was then transferred to a 30-mm petri dish filled with distilled water, and the internal reproductive organs were pulled out from the end of the abdomen by using precision forceps under a binocular microscope (SZ40; OLYMPUS Optical, Tokyo, Japan). The mating status of the queen was determined by the presence or absence of sperm in the spermatheca. As an indicator of oviposition, the ovary’s yellow body was checked. As a positive control [18], 11 queens of a congeneric species, M. intrudens, were dissected in the same manner.

Table 2. Dissected queens from each sampling site.

Insemination Yellow body
Locality No. of nests No. of queens yes no yes unclear
1 Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture 3 10 0 10 9 1
2 Tsuchiura City, Ibaraki Prefecture 8 8 0 8 7 1
3 Chofu City, Tokyo Metropolis 8 8 0 8 5 3
4 Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture 8 8 0 8 3 5
5 Otsu City, Shiga Prefecture 2 9 0 9 9 0
6 Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture 4 8 0 8 8 0
7 Higashiosaka City, Osaka Prefecture 1 1 0 1 1 0
8 Okazaki City, Aichi Prefecture 1 8 0 8 8 0
10 Kaizu City, Gifu Prefecture 1 1 0 1 1 0
11 Tobishima Island, Sakata City, Yamagata Prefecture 2 2 0 2 1 1
Total 38 63 0 63 52 11
Monomorium intrudens, Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture 4 11 10 1 11 0

The numbers of individuals possessing a yellow body and presumed to have experienced oviposition are also shown. As a positive control, data for the sexual congener M. intrudens are shown in the bottom row.

Rearing experiment

Each wild nest was put into a plastic container (68 × 39 × 15 mm) with gypsum on the bottom. The nests were kept in the laboratory at 25°C, and water and food were replenished every 3 days. The nests were fed mealworms, Tenebrio molitor, cut into approximately 5-mm lengths. During July and August 2017, a total of 44 queen broods (larvae or pupae) from 21 nests of seven populations were produced (Table 3). Each queen was isolated with 10 nestmate workers in a plastic container (36 × 36 × 14 mm). These nests were kept under the same conditions as the source nests. Reproduction by these virgin queens was observed for 6 months. Finally, all remaining queens were dissected and confirmed to have no sperm in their spermathecae (Table 4).

Table 3. Thelytokous worker production in the rearing experiment.

Locality No. of nests No. of queens isolated No. of queens surviving for 6 months No. of workers produced
1 Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture 6 10 6 17
2 Tsuchiura City, Ibaraki Prefecture 3 7 2 11
3 Chofu City, Tokyo Metropolis 3 5 5 26
4 Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture 3 5 5 28
5 Otsu City, Shiga Prefecture 3 8 8 52
6 Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture 2 7 8 28
9 Sanda City, Hyogo Prefecture 1 2 2 15
Total 21 44 36 177

Table 4. Dissection of virgin queens from the rearing experiment.

No. of queens dissected Insemination Yellow body
Locality yes no yes unclear
1 Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture 0a NA NA NA NA
2 Tsuchiura City, Ibaraki Prefecture 2 0 2 2 0
3 Chofu City, Tokyo Metropolis 5 0 5 3 2
4 Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture 5 0 5 2 3
5 Otsu City, Shiga Prefecture 8 0 8 3 5
6 Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture 7 0 7 2 5
9 Sanda City, Hyogo Prefecture 2 0 2 1 1
Total 29 0 29 13 16

aWe did not examine queens from Kyoto due to their death before dissection.

Microsatellite analysis

To provide genetic evidence of thelytoky, 33 queens (from 17 nests of seven populations; all used in the rearing experiment) were examined (Table 5). They were genotyped at microsatellite locus Mp-1 (f: GCCAATGGTTTAATCCCTCA; r: TCATACTGCGTGTGCCTTTC), originally developed from M. pharaonis [24]. Daughter workers produced from these virgin queens (174 individuals in total) were also genotyped and were compared with their mothers. The thorax of each individual was crushed and placed in a 0.2-mL microtube filled with 100 μL of a DNA extraction reagent (PrepMan Ultra Reagent, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cocktail contained 1 μL of template DNA, 0.3 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.3 μL of 10 mM dNTPs, 1.5 μL of 10× PCR Buffer, 0.1 μL of 5 U/μL Taq DNA Polymerase (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA), 0.2 μL of U19 fluorescent dye, and 1.0 μL of each primer pair, to which distilled water was added to make a total volume of 15.2 μL. The PCR program consisted of an initial step of 94°C for 180 s, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 60 s and 72°C for 60 s, with a final step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were mixed with Hi-Di formamide and GS-600 LIZ size standard and were analyzed by using a 3500 Series Genetic Analyzer and GeneMapper 5.0 software (Applied Biosystems).

Table 5. Microsatellite analysis data.

Locality No. of nests No. of queens No. of workers Genotype Prob. that all offspring were heterozygous
1 Kyoto City, Kyoto Prefecture 4 4 15 222/234 (1/2)15 = 3.05 ×10−5
2 Tsuchiura City, Ibaraki Prefecture 1 2 11 220/232 (1/2)11 = 4.88 ×10−4
3 Chofu City, Tokyo Metropolis 3 5 26 222/232 (1/2)26 = 1.49 ×10−8
4 Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture 3 5 28 220/232 (1/2)28 = 3.73 ×10−9
5 Otsu City, Shiga Prefecture 3 8 52 220/228 (1/2)52 = 2.22 ×10−16
6 Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture 2 7 27 220/234 (1/2)27 = 7.45 ×10−9
9 Sanda City, Hyogo Prefecture 1 2 15 222/238 (1/2)15 = 3.05 ×10−5
Total 17 33 174 (1/2)174 = 4.18 ×10−53

Genotypes at the Mp-1 locus are shown. Under the assumption of sexual reproduction, the probability that all daughter workers would be heterozygous was calculated.

Microbial analysis

To assess potential infection of M. triviale by thelytoky-inducing bacteria, we performed high-throughput amplicon sequencing by using whole bodies of adults. In August 2020, three M. triviale nests were collected in Takaragaike Park, Kyoto, Japan (lat 35.060087, long 135.788488). All colonies were transported to our laboratory and moved to plastic containers (68 × 39 × 30 mm) with gypsum on the bottom. They were maintained at 25°C, and water replenishment and mealworm-feeding were performed every 3 days. In October 2020, ten queens and 100 workers were picked up from each nest. The queens or workers from each nest were stored as a group in acetone at –30°C. The pooled individuals represented one biological replicate (i.e., three replicates per caste). Whole bodies in each replicate were air-dried and pooled in a 1.5-mL plastic tube, and DNA was extracted with a QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN). We followed the manufacturer’s instructions and added extra steps of thermal cycling and lysozyme to the protocol to ensure the lysis of Gram‐positive bacterial cell walls: After being crushed in 180 μL ATL buffer, samples in plastic tubes first underwent two cycles of −80°C for 30 min and 50°C for 5 min; then, under room temperature, we added 2 μL of lysozyme from egg white (Nakalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan; 20 μg/μL TE buffer) to each sample and incubated the samples at 37°C for 30 min.

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and the subsequent data analysis were performed according to in‐house workflow by Bioengineering Lab. Co., Ltd. (Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan). The V4 region was amplified from 1 ng of template DNA by using ExTaq HS (Takara Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) polymerase and the 515f–806r primer pair. Sequences were determined by using a MiSeq system with a MiSeq reagent kit v3 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), which generated 2 × 300-bp paired‐end reads.

Demultiplexing (on the basis of a perfect match with the primer sequences used), adapter trimming, and quality filtering (phred score ≥ 20; primer sequences, 50 bp on both 3ʹ-ends, noise and chimeric reads were removed) of the paired-end reads were performed by using a Fastx toolkit (ver. 0.0.14, http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/) and dada2 plugin for Qiime2 (ver. 2020.8) [25], resulting in representative sequences and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) tables. Assignment of appropriate taxa (confidence level > 0.7) was performed by using the default setting of the feature-classifier plugin for Qiime2 against the EzBioCloud 16S reference database (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/).

Phylogenetic analysis

To investigate intraspecific diversity and determine the phylogenetic position of M. triviale, phylogenetic analysis was performed. A 639-bp region of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequence was determined by using PCR with a combination of primers, namely LCO1490 (GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG) and HCO2198 (TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA) [26]. One worker randomly chosen from each of 15 local populations (Table 1) of M. triviale and a single worker of the sexual species, M. intrudens, collected in Kihoku-cho, Mie, Japan (lat 34.21, long 136.33), were sequenced. Protocols for DNA extraction and the PCR mix were the same as for the microsatellite analysis. The thermal cycle consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were ethanol-precipitated and sequenced in both directions by using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit on a 3500 Series Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). A total of 16 sequences were submitted to the DNA Data Bank of Japan under accession numbers LC592050 to LC592065; see Fig 3). To identify the phylogenetic position of M. triviale after recent advances in systematics of the subfamily Myrmicinae [27], a congeneric species, M. pharaonis (GenBank accession number GU710434) and two former Monomorium species, Syllophopsis sechellensis (EF609858) and Erromyrma latinodis (GU709833) were added to the analysis. The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (HQ928672), was used as an outgroup. The 16 sequences, together with those of the above four species, were aligned by using ClustalW [28] in MEGA 10.0 [29]. Maximum likelihood analyses were conducted as implemented in MEGA 10.0 by using a GTR+I+Γ model with node support assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Fig 3. Maximum likelihood tree of 15 populations of M. triviale and related species, based on COI sequences.

Fig 3

The number at each branch of the phylogenetic tree represents the bootstrap percentage (1000 replicates). GenBank accession codes follow the taxon names. Scale bar: 0.1 substitutions per site.

Results

Dissection of wild queens

All 63 dissected queens of M. triviale had no sperm in their spermathecae (Fig 2, Table 2). Yellow bodies, suggestive of queen oviposition experience, were identified in 52 individuals across all 10 sampling sites. In contrast, 10 out of 11 M. intrudens queens dissected as positive controls had sperm in their spermathecae. Dissection of M. triviale workers confirmed their complete sterility (S1 File), indicating that their complete sterility reported in previous studies [30, 31].

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Reproductive organs of (a) Monomorium triviale and (b) M. intrudens queens. (a) M. triviale: Translucent (empty) spermatheca (spt), ovarioles with oocytes and obvious yellow bodies (yb) indicating that virgin queens were reproductively mature and laid eggs. (b) M. intrudens: Opaque (filled with sperm) spermatheca, well-developed ovarioles, and yellow bodies indicating that the queen is sexually reproducing. Yellow arrowheads indicate yellow bodies.

Rearing experiment

Eight queens died before producing daughter workers (Table 3). Thirty-six virgin queens from seven local populations survived, and each produced at least one worker. In total, 177 workers emerged during the experimental period; no males were produced. All dissected queens had empty spermathecae (Table 4). Despite all the queens producing workers, only 13 of 29 queens dissected had obvious yellow bodies.

Microsatellite analysis

Analysis of 33 queens and 174 workers showed that all individuals were heterozygous at Mp-1 and that the genotypes of all the daughter workers were identical to those of their mothers. In addition, all individuals within the same local population had the same genotype. Comparison of genotypes between mothers and their daughters enables us to infer the occurrence of sexual reproduction. A potential male mate of a heterozygous mother (genotype AB) either shares or does not share the same allele (A or B) of Mp-1 as the mother. We can rule out the latter possibility on the basis of the daughter genotypes. In the former case, the mother’s sexually produced daughters should have two genotypes in the expected ratio of 1:1. One is the same as their mother’s (AB) and the other is homozygous at one of the two mother alleles (AA when the father’s genotype is A, or BB when the father’s genotype is B). Under sexual reproduction, the observed bias toward the daughter’s same heterozygous genotypes as their mother would be extremely rare. (The exact binomial probabilities are given in Table 5.) Therefore, we can reject the possibility of sexual reproduction among the individuals that we genotyped.

Microbial analysis

MiSeq sequencing and Qiime2-based analysis yielded 8364 to 46,817 reads per biological replicate and a total of 267 OTUs (summarized in S1 Table). Among them, 263 OTUs (covering 99.9% to 100% of the reads) were classified as bacterial, and 117 OTUs (92.4% to 99.5% of the reads, excepting 54.7% of the reads from one queen replicate from nest B, see below) were classified at least to the phylum level. No reads were assigned to bacterial genera that are known to induce thelytokous parthenogenesis in Hymenoptera, i.e., Cardinium, Rickettsia, and Wolbachia [1].

In two nests (A and C) out of the three replicates for both queens and workers, the most abundant reads were classified as from Spiroplasma platyhelix (88.4% and 67.4% of total reads from queen and worker replicates, respectively, of nest A; 91.5% and 91.1%, respectively, for nest C). The replicates obtained from nest B showed a different pattern of S. platyhelix abundance: 0% from the queen replicate and 13.2% from the worker replicate. The absence of the S. platyhelix sequence from the nest B queen replicate was likely associated with the relatively small number of total reads (8364 vs. >30,000, S1 Table).

Phylogenetic analysis

The 639-bp partial sequences of COI were completely identical among all individuals representing 15 populations of M. triviale (Fig 3). These individuals were placed in the monophyletic group with M. intrudens and M. pharaonis. Although the genus Monomorium has recently been revealed to be a polyphyletic group [27, 32], our result suggests that M. triviale belongs to the genus Monomorium sensu stricto.

Discussion

Our comprehensive investigation allows us to add M. triviale to the list of parthenogenetic ants. Production of daughters by unmated queens (indicative of type III thelytoky) was corroborated on the basis of multiple lines of evidence: (i) absence of males and inseminated queens in the field-collected nests; (ii) worker production by laboratory-reared virgin queens; (iii) unfilled spermathecae of queens that produced workers; and (iv) identical genotypes of mother queens and daughter workers. These features were common to all the locations we tested, suggesting that thelytoky is a dominant mode of reproduction across Japanese populations of M. triviale.

It should be noted here that rare occurrences of males have been reported in other parthenogenetic ants (type II), such as Ooceraea biroi [19] and Pristomyrmex punctatus [33]. In addition, queens of M. triviale retain undegenerated spermathecae [18], suggesting that they have low level of specialization to male-free reproduction. Moreover, geographic variation in sexual and asexual reproduction has been reported in some thelytokous ant species (types II and III), such as Mycocepurus smithii, Myrmecina nipponica, and Platythyrea punctata [17, 21, 34]. Whether and how often sexual reproduction occurs in M. triviale, especially in populations outside Japan, would be an interesting topic for future study.

Our exploratory analysis of bacterial communities in M. triviale provides basic information for future studies of the host–symbiont relationship. No evidence was found for infection with thelytoky-inducing bacteria in this species, confirming previous reports of no cases of microorganism‐induced thelytoky in ants [10, 24, 35, 36]. Spiroplasma has been detected in various ant species [37], including another thelytokous species, Mycocepurus smithii (type III thelytoky) [38]. In Solenopsis, a genus closely related to Monomorium, Spiroplasma has been detected as a dominant bacterial taxon in whole bodies of adult workers of S. geminata [39], thus drawing parallels with our finding. It is noteworthy that type I thelytoky has recently been found in polygynous colonies of this species [40]. Spiroplasma is well known as a sex ratio distorter in Drosophila [41], and its role in the host’s reproductive biology deserves further study in ants.

In our phylogenetic analysis, the extremely low levels of diversity observed in the COI sequences suggest the possibility of rapid spread or selective sweep in the recent past [42]. Having no mutation in 639 bp of COI sequence translates to an estimated divergence time of no more than ca. 45,000 years (assuming a divergence rate of 3.54% My^−1 [43]). Our results support the concept that this species is a member of the genus Monomorium sensu stricto. This phylogenetic status is advantageous in that the study designs established in M. pharaonis, a well-studied model system (e.g., [4449]), will be applicable to future comparative analyses.

Thelytokous parthenogenesis is often considered as a trait overrepresented among introduced or invasive ant species [50]. Although some studies have categorized M. triviale as invasive [1, 19], no exotic distribution has been reported so far [14] and there is insufficient information to support the possibility of an introduced origin of the Japanese population of M. triviale. The known distribution range of this species is far more limited than those of successful invasive congeners such as M. pharaonis and Monomorium floricola [15, 51]. A preference for disturbed and urban habitats is shared widely among invasive ants [52]. Ito et al. [53] listed M. triviale along with Strumigenys membranifera, P. punctatus, and O. biroi as thelytokous ants found in “open, disturbed areas.” Among these species, the life history of M. triviale is most poorly known. In our study, M. triviale nests were found even in a thicket dominated by deciduous broad-leaved trees, which is not typical of “open, disturbed areas.” Nevertheless, the above information does not rule out the possibility that M. triviale will become invasive in the future. Additional studies of this species’ social structure, such as queen numbers and the mode of colony foundation, will help to evaluate the potential invasion risk of this species as an ecological consequence of its life history.

Supporting information

S1 File. Dissection of workers of M. triviale.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Microbial taxa and their relative abundances (% of total reads) per each M. triviale sample.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Kenji Matsuura who allowed us to use his laboratory. Fuminori Ito and Hroyuki Shimoji provided valuable advice on M. triviale biology and microbial analysis, respectively. We thank Kazuya Takeda, Kunio Sadahiro, Riou Mizuno and Yu Hisasue for field assistance. We also thank Hiroyuki Shimoji, Kiyomi Nakagawa, Kyosuke Ohkawara and Tomonari Nozaki for providing us with M. triviale nests.

Data Availability

New COI sequences generated for this study are deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession numbers LC592050 to LC592065. All the raw sequence data for microbial analysis have been deposited at the DDBJ SRA (DRA) under accession number DRA011730 (DRR279213-DRR279218).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowship for Young Scientists to NI (19J22242) and a grant from the Secom Science and Technology Foundation to SD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Rabeling C, Kronauer DJC. Thelytokous Parthenogenesis in eusocial hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58: 273–292. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Engelstädter J. Constraints on the evolution of asexual reproduction. BioEssays. 2008;30: 1138–1150. 10.1002/bies.20833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neiman M, Schwander T. Using parthenogenetic lineages to identify advantages of sex. Evol Biol. 2011;38: 115–123. 10.1007/s11692-011-9113-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goudie F, Oldroyd BP. The distribution of thelytoky, arrhenotoky and androgenesis among castes in the eusocial Hymenoptera. Insectes Soc. 2018;65: 5–16. 10.1007/s00040-017-0597-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hartmann A, Wantia J, Torres JA, Heinze J. Worker policing without genetic conflicts in a clonal ant. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100: 12836–12840. 10.1073/pnas.2132993100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Châline N, Jaisson P. Individual Experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol. 2007;17: 1308–1312. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dobata S, Tsuji K. Public goods dilemma in asexual ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110: 16056–16060. 10.1073/pnas.1309010110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bernadou A, Busch J, Heinze J. Diversity in identity: behavioral flexibility, dominance, and age polyethism in a clonal ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69: 1365–1375. 10.1007/s00265-015-1950-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oxley PR, Ji L, Fetter-Pruneda I, McKenzie SK, Li C, Hu H, et al. The genome of the Clonal raider ant Cerapachys Biroi. Curr Biol. 2014;24: 451–458. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Himler AG, Caldera EJ, Baer BC, Fernandez-Marin H, Mueller UG. No sex in fungus-farming ants or their crops. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;276: 2611–2616. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rabeling C, Lino-Neto J, Cappellari SC, Dos-Santos IA, Mueller UG, Bacci M. Thelytokous parthenogenesis in the fungus-gardening ant Mycocepurus smithii (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). PLoS One. 2009;4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wheeler William Morton HS. The ants of Japan. Bulletin of the AMNH. Bull AMNH. 1906; v. 22, art. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bolton B. An online catalog of the ants of the world. 2020 (accessed 17 December, 2020). Available from: http://antcat.org.
  • 14.Guénard B, Weiser MD, Gómez K, Narula N, Economo EP. The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: Synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News. 2017;24: 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wetterer JK. Worldwide spread of the pharaoh ant, Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News. 2010;13: 115–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pontieri L, Linksvayer TA. Monomorium. Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 1–6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rabeling C, Gonzales O, Schultz TR, Bacci M, Garciad MVB, Verhaaghe M, et al. Cryptic sexual populations account for genetic diversity and ecological success in a widely distributed, asexual fungus-growing ant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 12366–12371. 10.1073/pnas.1105467108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gotoh A, Billen J, Tsuji K, Sasaki T, Ito F. Histological study of the spermatheca in three thelytokous parthenogenetic ant species, Pristomyrmex punctatus, Pyramica membranifera and Monomorium triviale (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Zool. 2012;93: 200–207. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00498.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kronauer DJC, Pierce NE, Keller L. Asexual reproduction in introduced and native populations of the ant Cerapachys biroi. Mol Ecol. 2012;21: 5221–5235. 10.1111/mec.12041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Masuko K. Thelytokous Parthenogenesis in the Ant Strumigenys hexamera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2013;106: 479–484. 10.1603/an12144 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Masuko K. Thelytokous Parthenogenesis in the Ant Myrmecina nipponica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zoolog Sci. 2014;31: 582–586. 10.2108/zs140050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van der Kooi CJ, Schwander T. On the fate of sexual traits under asexuality. Biol Rev. 2014;89: 805–819. 10.1111/brv.12078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee CC, Hsu SF, Yang CCS, Lin CC. Thelytokous parthenogenesis in the exotic dacetine ant Strumigenys rogeri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Taiwan. Entomol Sci. 2018;21: 28–33. 10.1111/ens.12277 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.The invasion biology and sociogenetics of pharaoh ants. PhD Thesis, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark.
  • 25.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37: 852–857. 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3: 294–9. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7881515 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ward PS, Brady SG, Fisher BL, Schultz TR. The evolution of myrmicine ants: Phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst Entomol. 2015;40: 61–81. 10.1111/syen.12090 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22: 4673–4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35: 1547–1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The Ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990. 10.1007/BF01021020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ito F, Yamane S. Reproduction by ergatoid queens in the myrmicine ant Monomorium brocha (Bolton) (hymenoptera: Formicidae) in West Java, Indonesia, with a description of the male. Asian Myrmecology. 2014;6: 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sparks KS, Andersen AN, Austin AD. A multi-gene phylogeny of Australian Monomorium Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) results in reinterpretation of the genus and resurrection of Chelaner Emery. Invertebr Syst. 2019;33: 225–236. 10.1071/IS16080 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yamada A, Eguchi K. Description of the male genitalia of Pristomyrmex punctatus (Smith, 1860) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Asian Myrmecology. 2016;8: 87–94. 10.20362/am.008010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kellner K, Seal JN, Heinze J. Sex at the margins: Parthenogenesis vs. facultative and obligate sex in a Neotropical ant. J Evol Biol. 2013;26: 108–117. 10.1111/jeb.12025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grasso DA, Wenseleers T, Mori A, Le Moli F, Billen J. Thelytokous worker reproduction and lack of Wolbachia infection in the harvesting ant Messor capitatus. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2000;12: 309–314. 10.1080/08927014.2000.9522803 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wenseleers T, Billen J. No evidence for Wolbachia-induced parthenogenesis in the social Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol. 2000;13: 277–280. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00168.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kautz S, Rubin BER, Moreau CS. Bacterial infections across the ants: Frequency and prevalence of Wolbachia, Spiroplasma, and Asaia. Psyche (London). 2013. 10.1155/2013/936341 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sen R, Ishak HD, Estrada D, Dowd SE, Hong E, Mueller UG. Generalized antifungal activity and 454-screening of Pseudonocardia and Amycolatopsis bacteria in nests of fungus-growing ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 17805–17810. 10.1073/pnas.0904827106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ishak HD, Plowes R, Sen R, Kellner K, Meyer E, Estrada DA, et al. Bacterial Diversity in Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis geminata Ant colonies characterized by 16S amplicon 454 pyrosequencing. Microb Ecol. 2011;61: 821–831. 10.1007/s00248-010-9793-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lacy KD, Shoemaker DW, Ross KG. Joint Evolution of Asexuality and Queen Number in an Ant. Curr Biol. 2019;29: 1394–1400.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Paredes JC, Herren JK, Schüpfer F, Marin R, Claverol S, Kuo CH, et al. Genome sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster male-killing Spiroplasma strain MSRO endosymbiont. MBio. 2015;6. 10.1128/mBio.02437-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Avise JC, others. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard university press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Papadopoulou A, Anastasiou I, Vogler AP. Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench calibration. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27: 1659–1672. 10.1093/molbev/msq051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beekman M, Sumpter DJT, Ratnieks FLW. Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in pharaoh’s ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98: 9703–9706. 10.1073/pnas.161285298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jefford CW, Tang Q, Zaslona A, Tang Q, Zaslona A. Short, Enantiogenic Syntheses of (-)-Indolizidine 167B and (+)-Monomorine. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113: 3513–3518. 10.1021/ja00009a043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jackson DE, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW. Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature. 2004;432: 907–909. 10.1038/nature03105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Robinson EJH, Jackson DE, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW. Insect communication: “No entry” signal in ant foraging. Nature. 2005;438: 442. 10.1038/438442a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Warner MR, Mikheyev AS, Linksvayer TA. Genomic signature of kin selection in an ant with obligately sterile workers. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34: 1780–1787. 10.1093/molbev/msx123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Oliveira RC, Warson J, Sillam-Dussès D, Herrera-Malaver B, Verstrepen K, Millar JG, et al. Identification of a queen pheromone mediating the rearing of adult sexuals in the pharaoh ant Monomorium pharaonis. Biol Lett. 2020;16: 20200348. 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Trible W, McKenzie SK, Kronauer DJC. Globally invasive populations of the clonal raider ant are derived from Bangladesh. Biol Lett. 2020;16: 20200105. 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wetterer JK. Worldwide spread of the flower ant, Monomorium floricola (hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News. 2009;13: 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rabitsch W. The hitchhiker’s guide to alien ant invasions. BioControl. 2011;56: 551–572. 10.1007/s10526-011-9370-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ito F, Touyama Y, Gotoh A, Kitahiro S, Billen J. Thelytokous parthenogenesis by queens in the dacetine ant Pyramica membranifera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften. 2010;97: 725–728. 10.1007/s00114-010-0688-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nicolas Chaline

15 Mar 2021

PONE-D-21-02452

Comprehensive analysis of male-free reproduction in Monomorium triviale (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Idogawa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The two referees and I think your study is an important contribution to the ever growing field of alternative reproductive strategies in social insects. Only minor revisions are needed and I would be grateful if you were careful in taking them into account to make the paper even clearer and interesting for the reader.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 29 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nicolas Chaline

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

  1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

  1. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the sampling sites access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

3a, You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

3b, If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Idogawa et al. have done a very nice job documenting obligate thelotoky in Monomorium triviale. The work is very thorough using multiple approaches that cover all the bases of what one would want to see in a study of this nature. Analyses of additional microsatellite markers would have made it a little stronger, but the results are very solid as is. I appreciated the phylogenetic analysis given the recent upheaval regarding Monomorium taxonomy, as well as the microbial analysis to rule out a bacterial influence underlying asexual reproduction in this species. This study allows us to add another species to the list of obligate thelotokous ants, most specifically, those with queens that produce both new queens and workers parthenogenetically. The different approaches and the results are clear and easy to follow. It is very well written and I’m confident that it will be of general interest to readers of PLoS ONE. I have only very minor suggestions to help improve the paper.

Line 95: consider modifying to “First the queen was immobilized by soaking in 70% ethanol for 3 min.”

Line 254: should ref. 26 be ref. 27?

Line 282: consider rewording to “derived from the same daughter cell during the first meiotic division are fused to restore diploidy after the second meiotic division.”

Similarly line 284 could be reworded to read “different daughter cells derived during the first meoitic division are fused.”

Line 286: should read “hymenopteran” as it is used as an adjective here rather than a noun.

Line 312: consider replacing “habitat” with “habitats”

Line 318: consider replacing “Future” with “Additional” to avoid repetition since the last word of the previous sentence is “future.”

Excellent paper!

Reviewer #2: The occurrence of clonal reproduction in the ant Monomorium triviale has been regularly mentioned in previous publications, but no supporting data has yet been published. In this manuscript, Idogawa and coauthors demonstrate that Japanese populations of this species reproduce by clonal reproduction using several lines of evidence (dissection of queens' spermatheca, observation of laying by virgin queens, and microsatellite analysis) and that no known parthenogenesis-inducing bacteria could be found in colonies.

This is a usefull contribution to the field. The methods are sound and the results mostly support the authors' conclusion. One may regret, however, that no data demonstrating worker sterility is shown or cited (i.e. dissection of workers or rearing of queenless colonies). Besides, the discussion regarding the mode of parthenogenesis employed by M. triviale should be reconsidered. The authors suggest that clonal reproduction may proceed through central fusion automixis based on the observation that heterozygosity at the studied microsatellite is maintained across generations. Yet, this pattern could also result from apomictic parthenogenesis or terminal fusion automixis with selection against homozygosity.

Minor comments:

- There are some inconsistencies in Table 1 (there are more surviving queens than isolated queens in locality 6) and Table 4 (no locality 1 is not mentioned)

- l76-77 and l86-88: That "ethanol-preserved samples" are only mentioned for colonies maintained alive sounds weird.

- l300-302: One can be more precise here. Having no mutation in 639 bp of COI sequence translates to an estimated divergence time of no more than 45,000 years (assuming a divergence rate of 3.54% My−1; https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq051).

Hugo Darras and Laurent Keller

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Hugo Darras and Laurent Keller

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0246710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246710.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Mar 2021

Dear Dr. Chaline,

We are very pleased to have your valuable comments on the manuscript entitled “Comprehensive analysis of male-free reproduction in Monomorium triviale (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)" (PONE-D-21-02452). Based on the important advice from the two reviewers, we have made corrections as much as possible, and the following revisions have been made. Newly added supporting information S1 File responded to comments from reviewer #2 by confirming complete worker sterility in response to. We hope this revised manuscript could now be acceptable for publication.

Sincerely,

Naoto Idogawa and Shigeto Dobata

Response to Reviewers

We appreciate your constructive advice and have incorporated them into our manuscript as much as possible, as described below. In the file derived from the original WORD file, the revised sentences are highlighted, including additional acknowledgement. Lines in your comments indicate those of the old version you have already read, and those in the revised manuscript are indicated by line numbers in the WORD file.

Journal Requirements

[J-1] Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

I&D: We ensured that our manuscript including file naming meets PLOS ONE's style requirements.

[J-2] Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the sampling sites access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

I&D: We added a brief statement in the Materials & Methods (Lines 71) that no specific permission for sampling was required.

[J-3] We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. (~~) We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission.

I&D: In our Figure 1, we used map data from Natural Earth (public domain: http://www.naturalearthdata.com/). We indicate the data source credit in figure legend (line 81-82).

[J-4] Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct.

I&D: We checked the reference list as much as possible.

Reviewer #1

We highly appreciate your valuable comments. We made the following revision:

[1-1] Line 95: consider modifying to “First the queen was immobilized by soaking in 70% ethanol for 3 min.”

I&D: We modified the sentence accordingly (line 95).

[1-2] Line 254: should ref. 26 be ref. 27?

I&D: Thank you for your thorough reading. The citation number has been corrected (line 256).

[1-3] Line 282: consider rewording to “derived from the same daughter cell during the first meiotic division are fused to restore diploidy after the second meiotic division.”

[1-4] Similarly line 284 could be reworded to read “different daughter cells derived during the first meiotic division are fused.”

[1-5] Line 286: should read “hymenopteran” as it is used as an adjective here rather than a noun.

I&D: We appreciate your suggestion. Following comments from reviewer #2, we removed this paragraph.

[1-6] Line 312: consider replacing “habitat” with “habitats”

I&D: We modified the sentence accordingly (line 307).

[1-7] Line 318: consider replacing “Future” with “Additional” to avoid repetition since the last word of the previous sentence is “future.”

I&D: We modified the sentence accordingly (line 313).

Reviewer #2

We highly appreciate your constructive suggestions. We made the following revision:

[2-1] One may regret, however, that no data demonstrating worker sterility is shown or cited (i.e. dissection of workers or rearing of queenless colonies).

I&D: We added the data supporting obligate worker sterility by dissection as a supporting information.

[2-2] Besides, the discussion regarding the mode of parthenogenesis employed by M. triviale should be reconsidered. The authors suggest that clonal reproduction may proceed through central fusion automixis based on the observation that heterozygosity at the studied microsatellite is maintained across generations. Yet, this pattern could also result from apomictic parthenogenesis or terminal fusion automixis with selection against homozygosity.

I&D: We agree with your comment, our discussion about the mode of parthenogenesis is too speculative. Therefore, we removed this paragraph.

[2-3] There are some inconsistencies in Table 1 (there are more surviving queens than isolated queens in locality 6) and Table 4 (no locality 1 is not mentioned)

I&D: Thank you for your thorough reading. We understand that you mentioned Table 3 and 4 and corrected them.

[2-4] l76-77 and l86-88: That "ethanol-preserved samples" are only mentioned for colonies maintained alive sounds weird.

I&D: We agree with your comment. We modified the sentences (line 76-77 and 87-88).

[2-5] l300-302: One can be more precise here. Having no mutation in 639 bp of COI sequence translates to an estimated divergence time of no more than 45,000 years (assuming a divergence rate of 3.54% My−1; https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq051).

I&D: We appreciate your suggestion: 1,000,000 * (1/639)/0.0354 ~ 45,000. We added (line 295-296) together with the relevant reference.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 1

Nicolas Chaline

29 Mar 2021

Comprehensive analysis of male-free reproduction in Monomorium triviale (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)

PONE-D-21-02452R1

Dear Dr. Idogawa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nicolas Chaline

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Nicolas Chaline

13 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-02452R1

Comprehensive analysis of male-free reproduction in Monomorium triviale (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)

Dear Dr. Idogawa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Nicolas Chaline

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Dissection of workers of M. triviale.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Microbial taxa and their relative abundances (% of total reads) per each M. triviale sample.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    New COI sequences generated for this study are deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession numbers LC592050 to LC592065. All the raw sequence data for microbial analysis have been deposited at the DDBJ SRA (DRA) under accession number DRA011730 (DRR279213-DRR279218).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES