Skip to main content
Cardiology Journal logoLink to Cardiology Journal
. 2019 Aug 22;26(4):368–374. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0056

Time-to-effect guided pulmonary vein isolation utilizing the third-generation versus second generation cryoballoon: One year clinical success

Christian-Hendrik Heeger 1,2,3,, Christopher Schuette 2, Valentina Seitelberger 2, Erik Wissner 4, Andreas Rillig 2,5, Shibu Mathew 2, Bruno Reissmann 2, Christine Lemes 2, Tilman Maurer 2, Thomas Fink 1,2,3, Osamu Inaba 2, Naotaka Hashiguchi 2, Francesco Santoro 2, Feifan Ouyang 2,6, Karl-Heinz Kuck 2, Andreas Metzner 2,5
PMCID: PMC8084372  PMID: 29924380

Abstract

Background

The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging and reproducible clinical outcome data. The latest-generation cryoballoon (CB3) incorporates a 40% shorter distal tip, thus allowing for an increased rate of PVI real-time signal recording and facilitating individualized ablation strategies taking the time-to-effect (TTE) into account. However, whether this characteristic translates into favorable clinical success has not been evaluated yet. Herein was investigated 1-year clinical success after CB3 in comparison to CB2 based-PVI.

Methods

One hundred and ten consecutive patients with paroxysmal or short-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent CB2 (n = 55 patients) -or CB3 (n = 55 patients) -based PVI. The freeze-cycle duration was set to TTE + 120 s if TTE could be recorded, otherwise a fixed freeze-cycle duration of 180 s was applied.

Results

A total of 217/218 (99%, CB3) and 217/217 (100%, CB2) pulmonary veins (PV) were successfully isolated. The real-time PVI visualization rate was 69.2% (CB3) and 54.8% (CB2; p = 0.0392). The mean freeze-cycle duration was 194 ± 77 s (CB3) and 206 ± 85 s (CB2; p = 0.132), respectively. During a median follow-up of 409 days (interquartile range [IQR] 378–421, CB3) and 432 days (IQR 394–455, CB2) 73.6% (CB3) and 73.1% of patients (CB2) remained in stable sinus rhythm after a single procedure (p = 0.806).

Conclusions

A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings was seen using the CB3 as compared to CB2. There was no difference in 1-year clinical follow-up.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, cryoballoon, long-term outcome

Introduction

The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated high procedural success rates and convincing clinical outcome data for patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) [14]. The “Fire And Ice” trial proved non-inferiority of CB2- to radiofrequency (RF)-based PVI with regard to efficacy and safety for treatment of patients with PAF [5]. In consequence the latest AF guidelines state that PVI should be performed using either RF or CB catheters [6]. Current ablation strategies predominantly apply fixed freeze-cycle durations of 180–240 s, often-times followed by a bonus-freeze cycle. Recently protocols were modified aiming for shorter and fewer CB-applications and demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes [7, 8]. After identifying the time to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (time-to-effect [TTE]) as an essential indicator for durable PVI latest ablation strategies have been implemented the individual TTE [9]. The long distal tip of the CB2 limits proper visualization of PV since it prevents proximal positioning of the circular mapping catheter (Achieve, Medtronic) in close proximity to the CB’s surface. The third-generation cryoballoon (CB3, Arctic Front Advance ST, Medtronic) incorporates a 40% shorter tip facilitating a more proximal Achieve position. As a consequence initial studies found a higher rate of real-time PV recordings when utilizing the CB3 compared to CB2 [911]. However, whether this characteristic translates into favorable 1-year clinical success has not been evaluated yet. Herein was investigated the 1-year clinical outcomes after CB3 in comparison to CB2 based-PVI.

Methods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Consecutive patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PAF or short standing PersAF (duration ≤ 3 months) consented to CB-based PVI and were treated with second-generation cryoballoon (CB2 group, control), followed by 55 consecutively treated patients with the third-generation cryoballoon (CB3 group). Data on acute success of a limited number of patients was published before [9]. Exclusion criteria were prior left atrial (LA) ablation attempts, a LA diameter > 60 mm, severe valvular heart disease or contraindications to postinterventional oral anticoagulation. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in all patients prior to PVI to rule out intracardiac thrombi and to assess LA diameter. No further pre-procedural imaging was performed. The procedure was performed in patients on vitamin K antagonists under therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) values of 2–3. New oral anticoagulants were stopped 1 day prior to the procedure and continued 6 h post ablation. All patients gave written informed consent and all patient information was anonymized. The study was approved by the local ethic’s board (ethical review board number: WF-028/15) and was performed in accordance with ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Intraprocedural management

The intraprocedural management has been described in detail in previous studies by the present group [4, 9, 12]. In brief, the procedure was performed under deep sedation using midazolam, sufentanyl and propofol. Prior to transseptal puncture one diagnostic catheter was introduced via the right femoral vein and positioned within the coronary sinus (7 F, Webster TM, Biosense Webster, Inc. Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Single transseptal puncture was performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a modified Brockenbrough technique and an 8.5 F transseptal sheath (SL1, St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA). Selective PV angiography was performed to identify the PV ostia. The transseptal sheath was exchanged over a guidewire for a 12 F steerable sheath (Flexcath Advance, Medtronic). After transseptal puncture heparin boluses were administered targeting an activated clotting time of > 300 s.

Cryoballoon-based PVI

The 28 mm CB was advanced into the LA via the 12 F steerable sheath using the Achieve catheter (20 mm diameter, Medtronic, Inc.) for guidance. The CB was inflated proximal to the PV ostium followed by gentle push aiming for complete PV sealing. Occlusion of the PV ostium was verified by contrast dye injections. Standard freeze-cycle duration was TTE + 120 s. If the TTE could not be visualized, the freeze-cycle duration was set to 180 s. No additional bonus freeze-cycle was applied. The procedural endpoint was defined as persistent PVI verified by Achieve catheter (Medtronic, Inc.) recordings after the last CB application.

A spiral temperature probe (Sensitherm, St. Jude Medical) was advanced into the esophagus to monitor esophageal temperatures during each energy application. The intraluminal esophageal temperature cut-off was set at 15°C. During energy delivery along the septal PVs, continuous phrenic nerve (PN) pacing was performed using a diagnostic catheter introduced into the superior vena cava (7 F, Webster TM, Biosense Webster, Inc.). Pacing was set at maximum output and pulse width (12 mA, 2.9 ms) and a cycle length of 1200 ms. PN capture was monitored by tactile feedback of diaphragmatic contraction and assessment of the right diaphragmatic compound motor action potential (CMAP). Energy delivery was interrupted immediately if weakening or loss of diaphragmatic contraction was noted or a decrease of CMAP amplitude of ≥ 30% was seen. In case of persistent PN palsy, no further cryoenergy was delivered to septal PVs.

Postprocedural care

Following ablation, all patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography to rule out a pericardial effusion. Low molecular-weight heparin was administered in patients on vitamin K antagonists and an INR < 2.0 until a therapeutic INR of 2–3 was achieved. New oral anticoagulants were re-initiated 6 h post ablation. Anticoagulation was continued for at least 3 months and continued thereafter based on the individual CHA2DS2-VASc score. Previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs were continued for 3 months post ablation [4, 12].

All patients were treated with proton-pump inhibitors for 6 weeks.

Clinical follow-up and study endpoints

Following a blanking period of 3 months, patients completed outpatient clinic visits at 3, 6 and 12 months and thereafter in 6-month intervals which included electrocardiograms (ECGs) and 24 h-Holter ECGs. In addition, regular telephonic interviews were performed. Additional outpatient clinic visits were immediately initiated in case of symptoms suggestive of recurrent arrhythmia. The primary endpoint was defined as recurrence of any symptomatic or documented AF episode > 30 s following a blanking period of 3 months. Secondary endpoints were acute procedural data and procedure related complications such as phrenic nerve palsy, cerebral embolism, pericardial effusion/tamponade or atrioesophageal fistula.

Statistical analysis

Differences in metric variables between the two groups were analyzed with t-test if data were normally distributed, and otherwise with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Differences between categorical variables were evaluated using χ2 test or the Fisher exact test in case of small expected cell frequencies. PVI data was analyzed using mixed models. Linear mixed models were used for continuous data. Generalized linear mixed models were used for binary or count data. A hierarchical logistic regression model was applied for binary data. A Poisson distribution was assumed for count data. All p-values are two-sided and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. All calculations were performed with statistical analysis software SAS (SAS Institute Inc., version 9.3, Cary, NC, USA) [12].

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 110 consecutive patients underwent 28 mm CB-based PVI utilizing the CB2 (n = 55) and CB3 (n = 55) (Fig. 1). Patient baseline characteristics are depicted in Table 1. No differences were identified between the groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow-chart; AF — atrial fibrillation; PVI — pulmonary vein isolation; SSR — stable sinus rhythm.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Variable All CB3 CB2
Patients 110 55 55
Age [years] 62.1 ± 11.4 60.4 ± 11.1 63.8 ± 11.5
Body mass index [kg/m2] 27.5 ± 4.87 28.3 ± 4.9 26.7 ± 4.7
Female gender 33 (70%) 16 (70.9%) 17 (69.1%)
Paroxysmal AF 71 (64.6%) 34 (61.8%) 37 (67.3%)
Short persistent AF 39 (34.5) 21 (38.2) 18 (32.7)
Duration of AF [months] 24 (12, 48) 24 (14, 48) 16.5 (7.5, 48)
LA-size [mm] 45.0 ± 6 45.9 ± 7 44.1 ± 5.7
Congestive heart failure 12 (11%) 8 (6%) 4 (7%)
Arterial hypertension 69 (63%) 35 (64%) 34 (62%)
Diabetes mellitus type 2 12 (11%) 9 (16%) 3 (5.5%)
Previous TIA/stroke 7 (6%) 3 (5%) 4 (7%)
Coronary artery disease 12 (11%) 4 (7%) 8 (6%)
CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 2.0 (1.0, 2.0)
EHRA classification 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 2.0 (2.0, 3.0)

Values expressed as number (percentage), mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentiles) as appropriate. Test of no regression found no differences between the groups (p = 0.389). AF — atrial fibrillation; CB2 — second-generation cryoballoon; CB3 — third-generation cryoballoon; EHRA — European Heart Rhythm Association; LA — left atrium; TIA — transient ischemic attack

Acute ablation results

Acute ablation results are depicted in Table 2. In 110 patients, a total of 435 PVs were identified and targeted. One right superior pulmonary vein (CB3 group) was not isolated due to phrenic nerve palsy during CB application along the ipsilateral right inferior pulmonary vein. All other PVs were successfully isolated (434/435, 99.8%). Real-time PVI was visualized in 69.2% of patients in the CB3 and in 54.8% of patients in the CB2 group, respectively (p = 0.0392). A significant difference regarding the mean minimal CB temperatures was assessed (−45°C, CB3 and −48°C, CB2; p < 0.0001). Yet, no difference was found for the mean total number of CB freeze-cycles per PV until PVI, the incidence of PVI after first CB freeze-cycle, the mean TTE, total freeze-time applied, mean CB temperature after 30 s of the freeze-cycle, or mean minimal esophageal temperature. Furthermore, no differences were found for total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and total amount of contrast dye (Table 2).

Table 2.

Procedural details.

Variable All CB3 CB2 p
Number of PVs 435 218 217
Total CB cycles until PVI 1.1 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.6 1.1 ± 0.4 0.128
Number of isolated PVs 434/435 (99%) 217/218 (99%) 217/217 (100%) 0.316
Number of isolated PVs after 1st cycle 390/435 (89.7%) 191/218 (88%) 199/217 (92%) 1.000
Minimal temperature [°C] −47 ± 6 −45 ± 6 −48 ± 6 < 0.0001
Minimal esophageal-temperature [°C] 33.7 ± 4 33.9 ± 4 33.5 ± 4 0.474
Real-time recordings 270 (62.1%) 151 (69.2%) 119 (54.8%) 0.0392
Time to PVI [s] 47 ± 32 48 ± 32 45 ± 32 1.000
Temperature after 30 s CB cycle duration [°C] −31 ± 10 −29 ± 11 −32 ± 9 0.075
Duration of total freezing time [s] 200 ± 81 194 ± 77 206 ± 85 0.132
Total procedure time [min] 92 ± 28 94 ± 30 90 ± 27 0.525
Total flouroscopy time [min] 17 (13, 23) 19 (14, 27) 16 (13, 20) 0.389
Total amount of contrast [mL] 115 ± 25 115 ± 25 116 ± 25 0.792

Values expressed as number (percentage), mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentiles) as appropriate. CB — 28 mm cryoballoon; CB2 — second-generation cryoballoon; CB3 — third-generation cryoballoon; PV(s) — pulmonary vein(s); PVI — pulmonary vein isolation

All procedures were performed by three highly experienced operators and no differences were observed with regard to catheter maneuverability and stability.

Peri- and postprocedural complications

Transient PN palsy occurred in 1/55 (1.8%) patients in the CB3 group during energy delivery along the RIPV with full recovery of nerve function after 15 min. No pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, symptomatic PV stenosis, transient ischemic attack/stroke, or atrioesophageal fistula were observed in any group.

Clinical follow-up

Clinical 1-year follow-up was obtained in 105/110 (95.5%) patients, while 5/110 (4.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. During a median follow-up of 409 (interquartile range [IQR] 378–421, CB3) days and 432 days (IQR 394–455, CB2) 73.6% of patients (CB3) and 73.1% of patients (CB2) remained in stable sinus rhythm (p = 0.806) following a single 28 mm CB-based PVI procedure including a 3-month blanking period (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Recurrence free survival between the groups (n = 110 patients). Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating the relative proportion of patients in stable sinus rhythm following initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the third-generation cryoballoon (CB3) compared to the second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) including a 3-month blanking period. During a median follow-up of 409 (interquartile range [IQR] 378–421, CB3) days and 432 days (IQR 394–455, CB2) 73.6% of patients (CB3) and 73.1% of patients (CB2) remained in stable sinus rhythm without any differences between the groups (p = 0.806) following a single 28 mm CB-based PVI procedure including a 3-month blanking period. No significant difference was found for the follow-up duration (p = 0.071).

Discussion

The current study set out to compare procedural characteristics and acute and 1-year clinical efficacy of the novel 28 mm CB3 to the CB2 for PVI in patients with PAF and short-standing persAF. The major findings are 1) the CB3 provides an identical rate of acute PVI during the index freeze-cycle as the CB2, 2) the incidence of PVs with real-time signal recordings was significantly higher in the CB3 group, 3) procedure and fluoroscopy times were not different although a trend towards shorter freeze-cycles was observed in the CB3 group when considering the individual TTE, and 4) there were no statistical significant differences in the 1-year clinical outcomes between both groups.

Recent studies focusing on CB2 ablation demonstrated a high rate of PVI (84–90%) during the index freeze cycle [1214], superior 1- and 2-year clinical outcomes as compared to first-generation CB even if “no-bonus” freeze protocols or a shorter freeze-cycle durations were applied, and a high rate of durable PVI as demonstrated in patients undergoing repeat procedures for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after previous second-generation CB ablation [15]. Modified ablation strategies taking the individual TTE into account are currently under investigation. An essential prerequisite for TTE-based ablation protocols is a considerably high incidence of real-time PV potential recordings. Incorporating individual TTE into ablation protocols may reduce total energy transfer per PV which in turn may contribute to an even better safety-profile of CB-based PVI [16].

The current study confirms that a high rate of PVI with initial freeze-cycle can be achieved with both, the CB3 and CB2 (86% vs. 92%, p = 0.14). Although mean minimal balloon-temperature measured when applying CB2 was significantly lower than with CB3, acute efficacy was similar for both CB generations. Observed differences in minimal balloon-temperatures might be caused by a slightly changed position of the temperature probe of CB3 to a more proximal position compared to CB2. This fact causes a minimally longer distance of the returning gas to the temperature probe and therefore higher returning gas temperatures. Of note, no significant difference was assessed between both groups for balloon temperature reached at 30 s of the respective freeze-cycle [17]. There was also no difference when comparing the lowest intraluminal esophageal temperatures. These facts additionally support the observation of an equal acute efficacy of both CB-generations.

Characteristic complications of CB-based PVI such as PN palsy or a significant drop in intraluminal esophageal temperatures potentially resulting in esophageal thermal injury typically occur at later stages of the freeze-cycles [18]. Therefore, recent ablation protocols aim not only to reduce of the number of freeze-cycles per PV but especially for shorter freeze-cycle durations to further improve the safety profile of CB-based PVI [17]. The Achieve catheter provides online visualization of PV signals. However, the relatively long distal tip of CB2 may prevent proper positioning of the Achieve catheter at proximal PV ostium, thus limiting real-time signal recording in a considerable number of PVs and individualized ablation protocols considering TTE [14, 19]. The novel CB3 was modified and incorporates a 40% shorter distal tip, potentially facilitating more proximal positioning of Achieve-catheter and increased rates of real-time PV signal recordings. Accordingly, the current study found a significantly higher percentage of real-time PVI recordings for CB3 as compared to CB2 group (69.2% vs. 54.8%, p = 0.0392) and in consequence allowed for a higher percentage of PVs in which individual TTE was taken into account without affecting overall clinical outcomes. In conclusion, this means that a shorter balloon tip will further facilitate individualized ablation strategies and might further improve the safety profile of CB ablation due to shorter but efficient energy transfer [20]. Although one group reported on balloon dislodgement during hockey stick maneuvers caused by the shortened distal tip of CB3 [21], no differences concerning catheter stability and catheter maneuverability have been observed in the present analysis. Although CB3 was taken from the market it would be desirable that future CB generations again incorporate a shortened distal tip.

Limitations of the study

The current study is a retrospective analysis and is based on a single-center experience in a limited number of patients. Since this is not a randomized controlled trial with proper power calculations any conclusions regarding outcome are hypothesis-generating only. Currently, the CB3 is not available. However, future CB generations might again incorporate a shorter balloon tip.

Conclusions

According to available research, this is the first study reporting on procedural characteristics and 1-year clinical outcomes of CB3- as compared to CB2-based PVI. While demonstrating comparable acute and 1-year efficacy, the CB3 provides a significantly increased rate of real-time PV-recordings as compared to CB2 and thus facilitates individual ablation strategies considering individual TTE.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Claudia Kalkowsky, Sanela Dzudzevics, Peter Wohlmuth and Detlef Hennig for their excellent assistance.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: Christian-Hendrik Heeger received travel grants by St. Jude Medical, Biotronik and Medtronic. Erik Wissner is a consultant to Medtronic. Karl-Heinz Kuck received travel grants and research grants from Biosense Webster, Stereotaxis, Prorhythm, Medtronic, Edwards, Cryocath, and is a consultant to St. Jude Medical, Biosense Webster, Prorhythm, and Stereotaxis. He received speaker’s honoraria from Medtronic. Andreas Metzner received speaker’s honoraria and travel grants from Medtronic, Biosense Webster and Cardiofocus. All other authors have no relevant disclosures.

References

  • 1.Heeger CH, Wissner E, Knöll M, et al. Three-Year Clinical Outcome After 2nd-Generation Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation — A 2-Center Experience. Circ J. 2017;81(7):974–980. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lemes C, Wissner E, Lin T, et al. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation using the second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon: a retrospective analysis. Europace. 2016;18(2):201–205. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Metzner A, Heeger CH, Wohlmuth P, et al. Two-year outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon: lessons from the bonus freeze protocol. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(1):72–78. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0890-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Metzner A, Reissmann B, Rausch P, et al. One-Year Clinical Outcome After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using the Second-Generation 28-mm Cryoballoon. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2014;7(2):288–292. doi: 10.1161/circep.114.001473.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–2245. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893–2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ciconte G, de Asmundis C, Sieira J, et al. Single 3-minute freeze for second-generation cryoballoon ablation: one-year follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(4):673–680. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heeger CH, Wissner E, Wohlmuth P, et al. Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “no bonus-freeze” protocol using the second- generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(9):774–782. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-0987-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heeger CH, Wissner E, Mathew S, et al. Short tip-big difference? First-in-man experience and procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the third-generation cryoballoon. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(6):482–488. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0944-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chierchia GB, Mugnai G, Ströker E, et al. Incidence of real-time recordings of pulmonary vein potentials using the third-generation short-tip cryoballoon. Europace. 2016;18(8):1158–1163. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aryana A, Kowalski M, O’Neill PG, et al. Catheter ablation using the third-generation cryoballoon provides an enhanced ability to assess time to pulmonary vein isolation facilitating the ablation strategy: Short- and long-term results of a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(12):2306–2313. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wissner E, Heeger CH, Grahn H, et al. One-year clinical success of a ‘no-bonus’ freeze protocol using the second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2015;17(8):1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martins RP, Hamon D, Césari O, et al. Safety and efficacy of a second-generation cryoballoon in the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(3):386–393. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Schmidt B, et al. Improved procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel second-generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(5):492–497. doi: 10.1111/jce.12082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heeger CH, Wissner E, Mathew S, et al. Once Isolated, Always Isolated? Incidence and Characteristics of Pulmonary Vein Reconduction After Second-Generation Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(5):1088–1094. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reissmann B, Wissner E, Deiss S, et al. First insights into cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation taking the individual time-to-isolation into account. Europace. 2017;19(10):1676–1680. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Su W, Kowal R, Kowalski M, et al. Best practice guide for cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation: The compilation experience of more than 3000 procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):1658–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Metzner A, Burchard A, Wohlmuth P, et al. Increased incidence of esophageal thermal lesions using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):769–775. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Straube F, Dorwarth U, Vogt J, et al. Differences of two cryoballoon generations: insights from the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Substudy. Europace. 2014;16(10):1434–1442. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rottner L, Fink T, Heeger CH, et al. Is less more? Impact of different ablation protocols on periprocedural complications in second-generation cryoballoon based pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2017 doi: 10.1093/europace/eux219. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fürnkranz A, Bologna F, Bordignon S, et al. Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel third-generation cryoballoon. Europace. 2016;18(12):1795–1800. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cardiology Journal are provided here courtesy of Via Medica sp. z o.o. sp. k.

RESOURCES