Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Apr 29;10(17):e00136-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00136-21

Complete Genome Sequences of Four Canadian Mycoplasma bovis Strains Isolated from Bison and Cattle

Harish Menghwar a, Tracy Prysliak a, Jose Perez-Casal a,
Editor: David A Baltrusb
PMCID: PMC8086203  PMID: 33927029

Mycoplasma bovis is a major bacterial pathogen that causes respiratory diseases in cattle and bison. We report here the complete genome sequences of four Mycoplasma bovis strains isolated in three Canadian provinces. These genome sequences could provide important information on virulence factors and targets for new vaccines against M. bovis.

ABSTRACT

Mycoplasma bovis is a major bacterial pathogen that causes respiratory diseases in cattle and bison. We report here the complete genome sequences of four Mycoplasma bovis strains isolated in three Canadian provinces. These genome sequences could provide important information on virulence factors and targets for new vaccines against M. bovis.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Mycoplasma bovis was first identified from mastitic milk in the United States in 1961 (1). M. bovis is the most prevalent bovine mycoplasma pathogen, causing pneumonia, otitis media, arthritis, mastitis, and reproductive disorders, resulting in unprecedented economic problems in both the dairy and beef industries globally (2, 3). M. bovis has also emerged as an important pathogen of North American bison (Bison bison) (4). The M. bovis factors responsible for disease development are not known; thus, genomic sequencing of different isolates of this pathogen may help in the elucidation of these factors. Our previous study showed differences in the modulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation, invasion of tracheal and lung epithelial cells, along with modulation of apoptosis and survival in alveolar macrophages between some M. bovis cattle and bison isolates (5). We performed genomic sequencing on four strains, two isolated from cattle and two from bison, as a first step toward identifying the differences between these genomes that may explain their diverse phenotypes.

In this study, we obtained the complete genome sequences of M. bovis strains Mb1, Mb160, Mb300, and Mb304, isolated from clinical cases in bison and cattle in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Manitoba, Canada (5). The details of M. bovis isolates and the genome characteristics are provided in Table 1. The isolates were grown from frozen stocks in modified Hayflick’s broth (HFB; BD Difco, France), supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated horse serum (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA), 0.1% yeast extract (BD Bacto, France), and 0.1 mg/ml ampicillin (Bio Basic Canada, Inc.), and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 48 h. The strains were single-cell cloned by passaging through a 0.2-μm syringe filter, serially diluted, plated onto Hayflick’s agar (HFA) plates, incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 5 days, and identified by PCR targeting the uvrC gene of M. bovis (6). The purified isolates were cultured in Hayflick’s broth containing 50% glycerol and stored at −80°C.

TABLE 1.

Name, geographic location, anatomic site, date of origin, sequencing metrics, and accession numbers of M. bovis isolate genome sequences

Isolate name Geographical origin (province) Anatomic site of isolation Yr of origin Host species Genome length (bp) No. of reads from:
Genome coverage (×) PacBio read N50 (bp) G+C content (%) Total no. of CDSa No. of pseudogenes No. of RNA genes SRA accession no. for:
GenBank accession no.
PacBio Illumina PacBio reads Illumina reads
Mb1 Saskatchewan Stifle joint 2006 Cattle 978,001 321,573 4,237,973 872.32 16,921 29.30 812 42 43 SRX9572988 SRX9572984 CP069056
Mb160 Alberta Lung 2008 Cattle 1,049,056 190,447 3,748,153 410.05 18,114 29.26 854 64 43 SRX9572989 SRX9572985 CP069057
Mb300 Saskatchewan Lung 2012 Bison 1,162,329 298,524 4,824,606 990.91 16,996 29.01 947 82 43 SRX9572990 SRX9572986 CP069100
Mb304 Manitoba Lung 2012 Bison 1,039,622 253,858 4,465,692 961.16 18,644 29.64 843 56 43 SRX9572991 SRX9572987 CP069101
a

CDS, coding DNA sequences.

Genomic DNA was extracted for both PacBio and Illumina sequencing by using the DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen). The harvested DNA was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Scientific). Genomic sequencing was carried out by CD Genomics (New York, USA). The libraries were constructed using the SMRTbell DNA template with a fragment size of >10 kb, selected using a BluePippin system (7). The library quality was analyzed by Qubit and quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the average fragment size was estimated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The whole genome was sequenced using the PacBio Sequel II platform. Default parameters were used for all software. Microbial assembly of the sequencing reads was performed using HGAP4 and Canu v1.6 software (8). The Canu v1.6 assembly software for PacBio was used to correct the reads, trim the ambiguous regions, and finally assemble high-quality genome sequences. Multiple assembled results were mirrored to each other to generate completed genome sequences.

Illumina sequencing was carried out using the NovaSeq 6000 platform with the 2 × 150-bp sequencing configuration (CD Genomics). For the next-generation sequencing (NGS) data or Illumina reads, Pilon v.1.22 (9) was used for assembly and correction based on the NGS reads to obtain the final assembly result. The sequences reported here provide valuable information for future studies on M. bovis virulence factors and targets for vaccines. The genomes were annotated by NCBI using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.2 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/) (10).

Data availability.

These genome assemblies have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA680748, with the isolate-specific accession numbers indicated in Table 1. The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by financial support from the Government of Saskatchewan through the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund (ADF, grant number 2015180) and the Saskatchewan Cattlemen’s Association (SCA, grant number 2017-094).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hale HH, Helmboldt CF, Plastridge WN, Stula EF. 1962. Bovine mastitis caused by a Mycoplasma species. Cornell Vet 52:582–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Calcutt MJ, Lysnyansky I, Sachse K, Fox LK, Nicholas RAJ, Ayling RD. 2018. Gap analysis of Mycoplasma bovis disease, diagnosis and control: an aid to identify future development requirements. Transbound Emerg Dis 65 Suppl 1:91–109. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maunsell FP, Woolums AR, Francoz D, Rosenbusch RF, Step DL, Wilson DJ, Janzen ED. 2011. Mycoplasma bovis infections in cattle. J Vet Intern Med 25:772–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.0750.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Register KB, Olsen SC, Sacco RE, Ridpath J, Falkenberg S, Briggs R, Kanipe C, Madison R. 2018. Relative virulence in bison and cattle of bison-associated genotypes of Mycoplasma bovis. Vet Microbiol 222:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Suleman M, Prysliak T, Clarke K, Burrage P, Windeyer C, Perez-Casal J. 2016. Mycoplasma bovis isolates recovered from cattle and bison (Bison bison) show differential in vitro effects on PBMC proliferation, alveolar macrophage apoptosis and invasion of epithelial and immune cells. Vet Microbiol 186:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Subramaniam S, Bergonier D, Poumarat F, Capaul S, Schlatter Y, Nicolet J, Frey J. 1998. Species identification of Mycoplasma bovis and Mycoplasma agalactiae based on the uvrC genes by PCR. Mol Cell Probes 12:161–169. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1998.0160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

These genome assemblies have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA680748, with the isolate-specific accession numbers indicated in Table 1. The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES