Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250114

Ethno-veterinary practice for the treatment of animal diseases in Neelum Valley, Kashmir Himalaya, Pakistan

Sardar Muhammad Rafique Khan 1,*, Tanveer Akhter 1, Mumtaz Hussain 2
Editor: Khawaja Shafique Ahmad3
PMCID: PMC8087047  PMID: 33930052

Abstract

Plant species are not only used as fodder or forage but also contribute substantially in the treatment of various health disorders, particularly in livestock. This study is the first quantitative ethnobotanical effort on ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants conducted in the Upper Neelum Valley of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan. Information pertaining to cure different ailments of animals were collected from 126 informants through semi-structured interviews, group discussion and field walks. In order to identify the plant species used and their preferred habitats, elderly and experienced members of the tribes, locally known ’Budhair’ (aged), were interviewed and sometimes accompanied in the field. The data was further analyzed through ethnobotanical indices. In all, 39 plant species, belonging to 31 genera and 21 families were documented which were used by the indigenous communities of Kashmir Himalaya for curing 21 different diseases of 7 different types of livestock. The highest number of ethno-medicinal plants were contributed by the Polygonaceae family, followed by Crassulaceae, Asteraceae and other families. Roots were the most used part of the plant for preparing ethnoveterinary medicines, followed by the aerial parts. The highest frequency of citation (41) and relative frequency of citation (7.32) was recorded for Saussurea lappa, followed by Rumex acetosa (37/6.61), Rumex nepalensis (36/6.43), Thymus linearis (28/5.0) and Angelica cyclocarpa (28/5.0). The highest use value was recorded for Saussurea lappa (0.33), followed by Rumex acetosa (0.29), Rumex nepalensis (0.29), Thymus linearis and Angelica cyclocarpa (0.22 each). The current study has made an important contribution towards the preservation of indigenous plants-based knowledge from extinction. The phytochemical and pharmacological investigations of the plants with high use value can be a potential source of novel drugs to treat health problems of animals and humans.

Introduction

Medicinal plants have been used across the globe since ages due to their efficacy, availability as well as cultural beliefs. The herbal remedies are an essential part of the traditional medicinal practices in the indigenous Himalayan mountain communities. Plant based ethnoveterinary medicine are widely practiced in the Himalayan region since the livestock rearing is an integral part of the livelihoods [1]. These traditional herbal medicines provide efficient and cheap therapies along with their common accessibility in comparison to the western allopathic drugs [2]. This ethnic knowledge is directly linked with the local biodiversity and runs deep in the fabric of the rural societies through centuries [3]. Documentation of this altruistic folk knowledge holds key importance especially with the ratification of the Nagoya Protocol in order to maintain cultural heritage [4]. The growing scientific evidence suggests that this Ethnic knowledge supplemented with the new scientific insights can offer socially acceptable and eco-friendly approaches vital for the sustainable development of the local communities [5].

The western Himalayan mountains of Kashmir region supports rich biodiversity attributed to its diverse geography and landscape spanning from deep valley floor through terraced lands and dense forests, up to snow-capped alpine peaks [6]. This mosaic of diverse niches, habitat heterogeneity and the microclimatic variation along the altitudinal gradient results into harboring a bewildering floristic diversity in the region [7]. The rural mountain communities of the Kashmir region practice an agro-pastoral semi nomadic lifestyle, mainly depending on livestock rearing and subsistence agriculture for their livelihood [8].

Medicinal plants have been widely used as a primary source of prevention and control of livestock diseases in the local communities for several centuries, as the inhabitants have learned the medicinal usage of plants growing in their close vicinity [9]. It is an interesting topic to assess the monitory values of this plant based ethno-veterinary linked directly with the increasing cost of livestock rearing and maintenance. Furthermore, these ethnoveterinary medicine are very dynamic and multipurpose as they can treat several different types of livestock disorders, along with being readily available in the remote areas and cheapest as compared to the synthetic drugs [10].

This precious indigenous knowledge has usually been disseminated from one generation without any proper documentation and preservation [11]. The ethnoveterinary knowledge in the region is facing a threat of erosion as the locals are changing their preferences due to rapid socioeconomic transformations in the region synchronized with the environmental changes and technological advancements [12]. The researchers have done a lot of work on the ethno-medicinal applications of plants for human health [7, 1323]. But literature review reveals that very few studies have been carried out on ethnoveterinary applications of the local herbs in the region indicating a significant knowledge gap [2431].

Although there are very few studies available on the indigenous ethno-veterinary practices in various parts of Pakistan [22, 3237], the western Himalayan mountain region of Kashmir still remains unexplored in this regard because of its remoteness, harsh climatic conditions and rugged terrain. Current study was designed to document the valuable ethnoveterinary knowledge from this unexplored area to fill the knowledge gap. The specific objectives of the study include to document the important ethnoveterinary applications of local plant species of the Kashmir region used to treat the livestock ailments and disorders by the mountain populations of the area.

Materials and methods

Study area

Natural geomorphological features of Pakistan ranges from the snowcapped peaks of Himalaya and other mountain ranges in the north, the sandy beaches and mangrove swamps in south; allowing different landscapes and climates with variety of flora and fauna. This study was conducted in District Neelum of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJ&K), Pakistan, which is a hilly area with rugged topography, located in the extreme north of the AJ&K (Fig 1: Map of the study area). Total area of the district Neelum is 3621 Sq. kms with a population of 1.96 million [37]. Neelum Valley is located at 74°- 24′–50″ to 74°–31′–50″ longitude and 34°–50′–40″ to 35° latitudes. Elevation of AJ&K ranges from 360 meters in the south to 6325 meters in the north. The study area lies at an altitude of 2000 meters to 4000 meters. Most of the study area is on high altitude. The climate is temperate with cold winters and moderate summers. The winter season start from November and extends up to April. The high altitude areas remain under snow for 5 months. The major crop of the area is maize, while potatoes and red beans are also cultivated. The valley is rich in the floral diversity. The dominant tree species in the area are Pinus wallichiana, Abies pindrow, Picea smithiana, Cedrus deodara, Acer caesium, Aesculus indica and Prunus cornuta, while the dominant shrubs include Viburnum grandiflorum, Indigofera heterantha, Rubus ellipticus. The dominant herbs are Sambucus wightiana, Artemisia vulgaris, Lindelofia stylosua, Bistorta amplexicaulis, Polygonum alpinum and Bergenia ciliata. Neelum Valley is home to different ethnic groups like Mughal, Chaudhry, Butt, Pire, Wani, Syed, Malik, Turks, Khawaja, Rajput, etc. These groups migrated from different areas and are now settled in Neelum Valley. There is cultural and linguistic diversity in the area because of their different past backgrounds. The common languages spoken in the area include Hindko, Kashmiri, Gojri, Shina and Pashtu. The most distinctive features of district Neelum are its mountain ranges, natural lakes, waterfalls and valleys. Documentation was carried out in three sub-valleys of the district Neelum i.e., Surgan, Shounther and Guraize Valley and in a most populated town area Kel (Fig 1: Map of the study area).

Fig 1. Map of the study area.

Fig 1

There are very limited livelihood opportunities available for the people of Neelum Valley. Most of the pastoralists in the mountain part of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJ&K) and the farmers in the high fertile lands are practicing livestock raring from centuries. Livestock plays a pivotal role as it provides farmyard manure, rural transport, milk, meat and source of entertainment in the sports like polo and also has major role in rural economy by providing income and employment to small hold farmers and poor people of the society. Easily accessible and available ethnoveterinary medicinal plants provide a cheaper source for treatment of various diseases. In these communities, the modern veterinary health curative system is inadequate, therefore the inhabitants utilize traditional ethnoveterinary medicinal health system for health care. The economic condition of the farmers also restricts them to the use of modern allopathic drugs, which ultimately leads to poor livestock production and financial losses due to poor health of animals. Under such circumstances, ethnoveterinary medicines can be promoted as an alternative drugs and it can help in alleviation of the poverty by empowering the people to make use of their own resources for the treatment of their livestock.

Ethnoveterinary field work and interviews

Ethics statement

Code of ethics of International Society of Ethnobiology (2008) was followed during data collection (http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/). As the data collection was about the animals, therefore, the people who were in close interaction with the animals were targeted. After complete briefings to the informants about the purpose of this research work, verbal consents were taken from all the localities from where the data was collected. As most of the informants were illiterate and it was not possible to take written consent from them.

Demography and data collection

For the collection and documentation of demographic information, well informed persons of the relevant area were approached for interviews and group discussion in accordance with the standardized questionnaires prepared for this purpose. In order to collect the ethnoveterinary information, the data was gathered from the informants, conducting extensive field visits during the year 2012–2015 with the help of pre-planned questionnaires as standardized data collecting protocols [3840]. Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission was not required for data collection. But formal verbal approval from the respondents was taken before data collection at each locality. The methods employed during the present study were designed with the sole purpose of eliciting the precious wealth of information on the ethno-veterinary uses of medicinal plants practiced by the natives of the Kashmir Himalaya following the methods reported previously [3840]. Field surveys were conducted in various localities and some of these localities are: Surgan, Kalay Pani, Bukwali, Kel, Arangkel, Domail Bala, Shounther, Lunda Nar, Janawaii, Phulawaii, Halmat and Taobutt, The elderly and experienced members of the tribes, locally known `Budhair’ (aged), preferably above the age of forty were interviewed. More often, they were accompanied to the field for identification of plant species used in the veterinary treatment and their preferred habitats. The survey targeted farmers, shepherds, pastoralists, traditional healers, gardeners, shopkeepers, and plant collectors who had the knowledge of veterinary practices. The plant specimens were shown to them for authentication of relevant information, such as mode of preparation, method of use and dosage of each medicinal plant species. To bring an element of accuracy, the information obtained from one locality was cross-checked with that of others. Distribution status of the plant species used in the veterinary practices in the region (critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable and secure) was also determined on the basis of field observation and information collected from the inhabitants of the area.

Plant collection, identification and herbarium deposition

Plant specimens collection and utilization data collection was carried out from upper part of Neelum Valley, located at 74°- 24′–50″ to 74°–31′–50″ longitude and 34°–50′–40″ to 35° latitudes and altitude of 6500–13000 feet (2000–4000 meters). Specimens were collected mostly from wild with exception of few (5 cultivated species) from the cultivated lands. There is no requirement of any permit or permission to collect the samples. Most of the collection was carried out from public land which is property of the State and no formal permission is required for research work from the forest department of the State. In case where data collection was required from private lands, verbal permission was sorted from the land owners, before data collection at each site. Specimens of medicinal plants collected from each locality were provided with a collection number for future reference and supported by check lists for inventory. The plant specimens collected were processed at the Herbarium Department of Botany, University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Muzaffarabad and then identified with the help of available literature [36, 37, 4143]. The properly processed plant specimens were deposited in the Herbarium Department of Botany, University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Muzaffarabad [43].

Data analysis

Relative frequency citation (RFC). The frequency of citation was calculated to assess the incidence of one particular plant species used for the treatment of veterinary diseases in relation to the overall citations for all plants. Relative frequency of citation was calculated using RFC = FC/N

Where FC = is the number of informants reporting the use of plant divided by the sum of informants who took part in the study (N) [9].

While, RFC = number of citation (for a given species) divided by number of citations for all species [44].

Frequency of citation for a particular species = (Number of citations for that particular species/Number of all citations for all species)*100.

Use Value (UV). Use Value (UV) of a species was calculated using UV = FC/N. where FC is Frequency Citation of one species divided by sum of the informants participated in the study (N).

The relative importance of each species was computed according to the given formula:

UVs=UViNi,

[45]; Where ‘UVi” represents use value for a given species among the informants who participated, and ‘Ni’ represents the sum of informants.

Results

In the present study, 39 plant species of 21 families have been recorded for their ethnoveterinary importance in the area. A total of 126 informants were interviewed at their homes, in the field or at the religious places through convenience sampling. Among these, 73 were the females and 53 were the male, Young informants (43) were between the ages of 30–45 years, 56 were of the age 40–60 years and sixteen were 61 to 75 years old. Rest of the 11 informants were of the age of 76 or above (Table 1). Majority of the informants (87) were illiterate and 26 informants were having 10 to 12 years of education while 13 informants were holding graduation level degrees. During interviews, it was observed that the illiterate and old age group informants have more traditional knowledge of plants than young and educated class. Females of above 40 years of age were found more informative and true practitioner of the ethnoveterinary sector. All the informants were interviewed in local language Pahari/Hindko/Kashmiri. The key questions on ethnoveterinary were on local names of plants and their parts used, mode of preparation and administration, amount of dose given, disease treated and personal experience of informants.

Table 1. Informant’s demographics in the study area.

Gender Education Level Occupation No. of informants
Female Illiterate Healer 16
Plant collector 27
Shepherd 14
Illiterate total 57
Matric / Intermediate Plant collector 7
Shepherd 4
Matric total 11
Graduation Plant collector 3
Shepherd 2
Graduation total 5
Female total 73
Male Illiterate Elder Non-professional 7
Farmer 8
Gardener 2
Healers 3
Plant collector 6
Shepherd 2
Healer 2
Illiterate total 30
Matric/Intermediate Elder Non-professional 3
Farmer 2
Gardener 1
Healer 1
Plant collector 4
Shepherd 1
Shopkeeper 2
Trader 1
Matric/Intermediate total 15
Intermediate total
Graduation Elder Non-professional 1
Farmer 1
Gardener 1
Healer 1
Plant collector 2
Shepherd 1
Shopkeeper 1
Graduation Total 8
Male total 53
Grand total 126

Taxonomic distribution and growth form of medicinal plants

The current study reported 39 medicinal plants belonged to 21 families, which were used for the treatment of 21 livestock diseases (Table 2). These include 24 herbs (62%), 10 shrubs (25%), 3 trees (11%) and 2 climbers (1%). Polygonaceae was the dominant family that contributed 7 species, followed by Crassulaceae (5 species), Asteraceae (4 species), Papilionaceae (3 species) and Lamiaceae, Apiaceae, Caprifoliaceae (2 species each). The remaining 11 families were represented by one species each (Fig 2: Family-wise distribution of the plants used for veterinary treatments).

Table 2. Ethnoveterinary use of the plants of Sharda Division, Neelum Valley AJK.

S. No. Plant name Family Local name Habit Alt. Range (m) Current Status Part Used Ethno-veterinary uses
1 Aconogonon molle (D.Don) H. Hara Polygonaceae Chukro Herb 2000–3000 Secure Rt Mashed uncooked roots are given orally to cure enterotoxaemia problems (Andran Da Taap). Roots after boiling in the water, along with molasses, in solution form are fed orally to cure lamb dysentery (PPR).
2 Aconogonon rumicifolium (Royle ex Rab.) H.Hara Polygonaceae Panchoola Herb 2500–3500 Secure Rt Mashed uncooked roots are given orally to cure enterotoxaemia problems.
3 Aesculus indica (Wall. ex Camb.) Hook.f. Hippocastanaceae Bunkhoor Tree 2000–2800 Secure Frt Fruits are mashed and fed to the cattle to treat indigestion (Malla) as it has warm effect. Seeds are also given orally as tonic, especially to the horses.
4 Ajuga bracteosa Wall. ex Benth. Lamiaceae Jan e Adam Herb 2500–3500 Vulnerable Rt Uncooked roots are given orally to the cattle suffering from internal heat (Peelia).
5 Angelica archangelica var. himalica (Clarke) E.Nasir Apiaceae Murchar Shrub 2000–3000 Secure Rt Roots of the plants are cooked and with the addition of molasses are given to cure indigestion cause by the cold. It increases internal temperature and relieve the pain. It is also used to cure dyspnea (Dhansna).
6 Angelica cyclocarpa (Norman) Cannon Apiaceae Chora Shrub 2000–3500 Vulnerable Rt Indigestion (locally known as Dood da Mala) in cattle is cured by giving uncooked roots with the addition of molasses. Same roots, while cooked are given to the cattle to cure indigestion caused by the cold (locally known as Thanady da malla). Used to cure animal’s dehydration (Taku) issue which usually results because of the non-availability of the water for a long time.
7 Aralia cachemirica Dcne. Araliaceae Chooryal Shrub 1800–2500 Secure Rt Mashed and uncooked roots are given to the cattle as tonic which also increases the production of milk.
8 Berberis lycium Royle Berberidaceae Sunmbal Shrub 1800–2700 Secure Brk The bark of the root and stem is peeled off, dried, grinded and then used in combination with rice, maize floor and butter as tonic to strengthen the bones and treatment of internal fractures.
9 Bistorta amplexicaulis var. amplexicaulis (D. Don) Green Polygonaceae Chiti Masloon Herb 2000–3500 Secure Rt Cooked roots (decoction) are given to the feeble cattle as tonic.
10 Bistorta amplexicaulis var. speciosa (Meisn.) Munshi & Javeid Polygonaceae Bari Masloon Herb 1800–2500 Secure Rt Cooked roots are given to the feeble cattle as tonic.
11 Capsicum annuum L. Solanaceae Rattian Marchan Shrub 1800–2000 Cultivated Frt Cotton cloth kept on hay and burnt. Dried fruits of Capsicum annuum (locally called Rattian marchan) are grinded and the powder in combination with sugar is also poured on the fire. Smoke and fumes produced are being forcibly inhaled to animal (horse/mule/donkey). Consequently, there is copious discharge from nasal cavities and animals become healthy. The disease is known as strangles (locally called Kannar).
12 Cedrus deodara (Roxb. ex D.Don) G.Don Pinaceae Pluddar Tree 1800–2250 Vulnerable Rsn Resin extracted from the trunk of Cedrus deodara after heating the chopped parts of the woods, is applied on the affected skin to cure/mange ecto-parasitism. Burned mobile oil is also used for the same purpose
13 Curcuma longa L. Zingiberaceae Liddhar Herb 1800–2300 Cultivated Secure Rt Roots of Curcuma longa (Haldi) are cooked in ghee are also fed orally to cure the issue of Prolapse of Uterus.
14 Dipsacus inermis Wall. ex Roxb. Dipsaceae Pilha Herb 1800–2500 Secure Rt About 1–2 kg of roots are mashed and cooked in water and given orally to expel placenta as post-delivery treatment in cattle. This has shown quick results and placenta is removed. Cooked roots of Dipsacus inermis (Pilha) are also used to cure prolapse of uterus (Mongra Ana / Bhar Ana).
15 Geranium wallichianum D.Don. ex Sweet Geraniaceae Ratanjoog Herb 1800–3000 Secure Rt Cooked roots are given to the cattle as tonic.
16 Helianthus annuus L. Asteraceae Gul e Aftab Shrub 1800–2300 Cultivated Secure Sd Crushed seed (Powder) are given to the week cattle orally as tonic to the general weakness.
17 Hylotelephium ewersii (Ledeb.)H. Ohba Crassulaceae Loonslooni Herb 2500–3500 Secure AP Whole mashed uncooked plant is fed to the goats and sheep to reduce the effects of over dozed salts, hence known as Loonslooni (Loon is local name of Salt).
18 Indigofera heterantha var. heterantha (Wall. ex Baker) Ali Papilionaceae Kainthi Shrub 1800–2800 Secure Rt Mashed uncooked roots are given to the young cattle as dewormer.
19 Lavatera cachemiriana var. cachemiriana S.Abdin Malvaceae Dang Sonchal Shrub 2000–2800 Vulnerable Rt Cooked roots are used to treat constipation in the animals.
20 Ligularia amplexicaulis DC. Asteraceae Mata Khaish Herb 2800–3600 Secure Rt Crushed uncooked roots are given orally to the young cattles to expel worms from the abdomen. It increase digestion and helps the young ones to graze fresh grass.
21 Phaseolus lunatus Linn. Papilionaceae Mooth Climber 1800–2400 Cultivated Secure Sd Seeds (Mooth) after boiling in the water are fed, so that blister should appear on the outer surface of the animal to cure Goat Pox (Thandian). Otherwise, the death of the animal is possible.
22 Phaseolus vulgaris Linn. Papilionaceae Mooth Climber 1800–2400 Cultivated Secure Sd Seeds (Moth) after boiling in the water are fed, so that blister should appear on the outer surface of the animal to cure goat pox (Thandian). Otherwise, the death of the animal is possible.
23 Punica granatum L Lythraceae Darru Shrub/tree - Cultivated Frt Other than the Alum (Phatkri), outer fleshy part of the fruit of Punica granatum (locally known as Darru) is dried, grinded and mixed in yogurt and fed orally to cure the issue of nephritis locally called Dkahotra/ Chulkna.
24 Rheum webbianum Royle Polygonaceae Chootyal Herb 2500–3600 Vulnerable Rt Mashed roots are given to cure indigestion and constipation issues in cattles. Mashed roots are also tied on the external injuries to relieve pain in the cattles.
25 Rhodiola himalensis (D.Don.)S.H.Fu. Crassulaceae Bugomasti Herb 2700–3600 Secure AP Aerial parts are crushed and fed to the young cattle as dewormer.
26 Rhodiola pinnatifida Boiss. Crassulaceae Bugomasti Herb 2800–3600 Secure AP Aerial parts are crushed and given to the young cattle as dewormer
27 Rhodiola sp. Crassulaceae Bugomasti Herb 2600–3500 Secure AP Aerial parts are crushed and given to the young cattle as dewormer
28 Rumex acetosa L. Polygonaceae Sufaid Hoola Herb 1800–3000 Secure Rt Cooked roots are believed effective to cure cough, indigestion and constipation. Roots are buried under the fire in ash and used to expel retained placenta as a post-delivery complication and also on cough.
29 Rumex nepalensis Spreng. Polygonaceae Hoola Herb 1800–3000 Secure Rt Cooked roots are believed effective to cure cough, indigestion and constipation. Roots are buried under the fire in ash and used to expel retained placenta as a post-delivery complication and also on cough. It is also used to cure dyspnea (Dhansna).
30 Saussurea lappa (Dcne.)Sch. Costus (Falc. Lipsch.) Asteraceae Kuth Herb 2500–3500 Critically Endangered Rt Crushed roots are given uncooked to the sheep and goats to expel worms and also believed as tonic. The cattle start eating after the treatment.
31 Sedum trullipetalum H&T. Crassulaceae Loonslooni Herb 2500–3600 Secure AP Un cooked, mashed whole plant is given to the goats and sheep to reduce the effects of over dozed salts, hence known as Loon slooni (Loon is local name of Salt).
32 Taraxacum laevigatum (Willd.)DC Asteraceae Hand Herb 1800–3200 Secure Rt Mashed uncooked roots are given to cure the post-delivery complication especially to expel retained placenta in the cattle.
33 Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn. Fabaceae Sinji Herb 1800–2600 Cultivated Secure AP Trigonella foenum-graecum (Maithi) is boiled and fed orally to the animals for the purpose to cure prolapse of uterus.
34 Thymus linearis Benth. Lamiaceae Ajwain/ Bun jamain Herb 2800–3500 Endangered AP Decoction of the whole plant with addition of milk, maize flour and molasses is orally fed to the animals suffering from indigestion (Malla) and hemoglobinuria (Rut Mortrna).
35 Urtica dioica L. Urticaceae Kairi Herb 1800–2800 Secure Lvs Vesical palpation with irritation, causing plant Urtica dioica (Kari), leaves is practiced which cause irritation in the birth canal and eventually animal is set into heat cycle called Repeat Breeding (Na Thairna).
36 Verbascum thapsus L. Saxifragaceae Gadikan Herb 1800–3000 Secure AP Leaves are cooked and given to the cattle to relieve pain in case of injury. Broad leaves are also lapped on the injured parts to relieve pain.
37 Viburnum cotinifolium D.Don. Caprifoliaceae Ukloon/ Guch Shrub 1800–2800 Secure AP Tips of the plants are collected while starting sprouting and are given uncooked orally to the horses and buffalos to cure constipations.
38 Viburnum grandiflorum Wall. ex DC. Caprifoliaceae Ukloon/Guch Herb 1800–2800 Secure AP Sprouting tips of the plants are collected mashed and given to the horses and buffalos uncooked to cure constipations.
39 Zea mays L. Poaceae Makai Herb 1800–2500 Cultivated AP Young plants of Maize (Makai) dried under shad are boiled and the hot plant parts are tied on the back of animals (cows & buffalos) which is believed to dry the internal fluid from the body of the animal, which is another type of “indigestion” (locally known as Linga da Malla)

Frt = Fruit, Lvs = Leaves, Rt = Root, AP = Aerial Parts, WP = Whole Plant, Sd = Seeds, Flr = Flowers, Rsn = Resin.

Fig 2. Family-wise distribution of the plants used for veterinary treatments.

Fig 2

Plant part(s) used, formulation and use categories

The information regarding the usage of parts of the plants was obtained from the participants revealed that different parts of the plants are used for preparation of remedies. Roots were the most used parts (49%) followed by aerial parts (28%), seeds (8%), fruits (8%), barks and resins (2% each), and leaves (3%) in the veterinary treatments (Fig 3: Plant parts used to cure different disease in the animals). The main method for preparation of the remedies was mashed uncooked (19 species), cooked (15 species), decoction (03 species), and powder and resin (one species each). The key informants in this study reported 21 major therapeutic uses of the plants which included enterotoxaemia, dysentery, indigestion, internal heat, dehydration, tonic, milk production, ecto-parasitism, post-delivery treatment, anti-salt, hemoglobinuria, prolapse of uterus, Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) a transboundary viral disease, dyspnea, repeat breeding, goat pox, deworming, nephritis, strangles, constipation and cough (Table 2, Fig 4). A total of 9 species were used as tonic, 9 in indigestion, 4 species for post-delivery treatment, deworming and constipations each, 3 for dysentery, 2 for each enterotoxaemia, dyspnea, internal heat, milk production, cough, goat pox, one for anti-salt, dehydration, repeat breeding, nephritis, PPR, strangles, hemoglobinuria and ecto-parasitism.

Fig 3. Plant parts used to cure different disease in the animals.

Fig 3

Fig 4. Frequency of the plant species used against different disease categories.

Fig 4

Medicinal plants used as tonic were Saussurea lappa, Aralia cachemiriana, Bistorta amplexicaulis, B. affinis, Helianthus annus, Geranium wallichianum, Berberis lycium, Aesculus indica and Angelica cyclocarpa. Plant species used for the treatment of indigestion were Aesculus indica, Thymus linearis, Saussurea lappa, Angelica archangelica, A. cyclocarpa, Rumex nepalensis, Zea mays and Viburnum grandiflorum. Plant species used to cure post-delivery treatments were Dipsacus inermis, Rumex acetosa, Rumex nepalensis and Taraxacum laevigatum.

Each plant species is provided with its scientific name and author citation, followed by the family, local name (in italics), growth form, altitudinal range in meters above mean sea level), distribution status in the region (critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable and secure), and lastly in brief the part (s) used and the mode of preparation and the dosage (wherever available). Proportion of the life form of the species is also given (Table 2; Fig 5: Proportion of life form of the plant species used in ethnoveterinary).

Fig 5. Proportion of life form of the plant species used in ethnoveterinary.

Fig 5

Relative frequency of citation and use value

Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) and Use Value (UV) of the medicinal plants was calculated ranging from 41 to 7.32 (Table 3). The highest RFC was found for Saussurea lappa (7.32), followed by Rumex acetosa (6.61), Rumex nepalensis (6.43), Thymus linearis (5.0) and Angelica cyclocarpa (5.0). The lowest relative frequency of citation was recorded by Rhodiola pinnatifida, Taraxacum laevigatum and Helianthus annuus (0.89 each). The highest UV was recorded for Saussurea lappa (0.33), followed by Rumex acetosa (0.29), Rumex nepalensis (0.29), Thymus linearis and Angelica cyclocarpa (0.22 each). The lowest use value was recorded in Rhodiola pinnatifida and Taraxacum laevigatum, which was 0.04 each (Table 3).

Table 3. Relative frequency of citation and use value of plants of the study area.

S. No. Plant name FC UV RFC
1 Aconogonon mole 25 0.20 4.46
2 Aconogonon rumicifolium 15 0.12 2.68
3 Aesculus indica 19 0.15 3.39
4 Ajuga bracteosa 13 0.10 2.32
5 Angelica archangelica var. himalica 20 0.16 3.57
6 Angelica cyclocarpa 28 0.22 5.00
7 Aralia cachemirica 18 0.14 3.21
8 Berberis lycium 16 0.13 2.86
9 Bistorta amplexicaulis 12 0.10 2.14
10 Bistorta amplexicaulis var. speciosa 13 0.10 2.32
11 Capsicum annuum 9 0.07 1.61
12 Cedrus deodara 9 0.07 1.61
13 Curcuma longa 7 0.06 1.25
14 Dipsacus inermis 27 0.21 4.82
15 Geranium wallichianum 14 0.11 2.50
16 Helianthus annuus 5 0.04 0.89
17 Hylotelephium ewersii 6 0.05 1.07
18 Indigofera heterantha var. heterantha 7 0.06 1.25
19 Lavatera cachemiriana var. cachemiriana 11 0.09 1.96
20 Ligularia amplexicaulis 18 0.14 3.21
21 Phaseolus lunatus 6 0.05 1.07
22 Phaseolus vulgaris 7 0.06 1.25
23 Punica granatum 6 0.05 1.07
24 Rheum webbianum 12 0.10 2.14
25 Rhodiola himalensis 6 0.05 1.07
26 Rhodiola pinnatifida 5 0.04 0.89
27 Rhodiola sp. 6 0.05 1.07
28 Rumex acetosa 37 0.29 6.61
29 Rumex nepalensis 36 0.29 6.43
30 Saussurea lappa 41 0.33 7.32
31 Sedum trullipetalum 6 0.05 1.07
32 Taraxacum laevigatum 5 0.04 0.89
33 Trigonella foenum-graecum 7 0.06 1.25
34 Thymus linearis 28 0.22 5.00
35 Urtica dioica 17 0.13 3.04
36 Verbascum thapsus 7 0.06 1.25
37 Viburnum cotinifolium 14 0.11 2.50
38 Viburnum grandiflorum 15 0.12 2.68
39 Zea mays 7 0.06 1.25

Discussion

Ethnoveterinary applications of the local plant species is an important part of the Himalayan mountain populations in the Kashmir region as livestock rearing plays a vital role in the local microeconomics and livelihood support in the region. Semi nomadic populations prefer the ethno-medicine as compared to the allopathic remedies as they are cheaper and readily available [46]. Our findings revealed that the local populations use a significant number (i.e. 39 spp.) of locally available plants for their livestock health care (Table 2). Medicinal Plant species utilized for livestock treatments harbor diverse range of habitats ranging from valley plains, temperate mountain forests, and alpine pastures climates in a wide altitudinal of 1800–3700 m. [22, 47]. It was observed that old age population groups, especially females, possessed more ethnobotanical knowledge because of their higher association with typical agro-pastoral lifestyle as compared to the younger generation [48].

The taxonomic analysis indicated the dominance of Polygonaceae, Asteraceae and Crassulaceae (Table 2). These families comprised mostly of herbaceous taxa in the local ethnoveterinary flora which relates with broader ecological amplitude and abundance of these families in the region [49]. The routes of administration of these herbal remedies were essentially oral whereas plant root was the most widely used part followed by the aerial part as a whole or the leaves. The herbs were the leading growth form of the medicinal species followed by shrubs, and trees (Fig 5). Herbs are often used because of their frequent availability, ease of collection and applications [50, 51]. Plant species were reported to be used through different modes of preparation to form crude drugs as well as to be fed as food supplements to promote faster weight gain, as enterotoxaemia, indigestion, dehydration, ecto-parasitism, post-delivery complications, dewormer, relieve constipation, respiratory, and reproductive disorders [52, 53].

The quantitative ethnobotanical indices offer accurate estimates of the plant use frequencies which can be utilized for the conservation management of the heavily consumed threatened plants of the region [54]. Our results have identified several important plants including Saussurea lappa, Aconogonon molle, Angelica cyclocarpa, Rumex acetosa, Geranium wallichianum Rumex nepalensis, Angelica glauca and Thymus linearis, having relatively higher use values in the region. Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) and Use Value (UV) shows that the highest RFC was found for Saussurea lappa, Rumex acetosa and Rumex nepalensis while the lowest relative frequency of citation was recorded for Rhodiola pinnatifida, Taraxacum laevigatum and Helianthus annuus. Similarly, the highest UV was recorded for Saussurea lappa, Rumex acetosa, and Thymus linearis and lowest use value recorded was in Rhodiola pinnatifida and Taraxacum laevigatum (Table 3) [36, 5557]. These overexploited species are most prime candidate for conservation in the region demanding immediate attention [55].

It was observed that the method of administering ethno-veterinary plant remedies varied greatly among the different ethnic communities [56]. Different communities were recorded to use different plant species for treating the same disease and vice versa. Similarly plant were used singly, as well as in combinations for treating various livestock ailments which reflects diversity of the ethnic knowledge and heterogeneity in the cultural practices [57].

Ethnic usage of indigenous medicinal plants to treat veterinary disorders and ailments offers a significant contribution in sustaining the livelihood support system of the local populations in the region [58]. The diverse ethnic knowledge reflects the rich cultural values of the society linked with sustainable utilization of the local plant diversity [59, 60]. Results provide a valuable database which has dynamic implications in the management of natural resource in the area [45, 5969]. These findings also provide baseline information by identifying the effective herbal remedies for livestock health which can be utilized by veterinarians and pharmacologists for the development of new therapies as well as isolation of bioactive compounds [45, 5970]. The results also serve as a conservationist’s proxy and provide an insightful scientific information for the conservation management of overexploited plant species of the region [45, 60, 70, 71].

Conclusion

Indigenous communities in Neelum Valley are dependent on medicinal plants for ethnoveterinary use. The people practiced 39 medicinal plants to cure 21 livestock diseases. Knowledge about the traditional medicinal system is restricted to the herders, farmers and elder community member. Some important plants like Dipsacus inermis, Rumex nepalensis, Angelica cyclocarpa, Saussurea lappa, Aesculus indica, etc. are having great significance in the ethnoveterinary practices. Among these, Saussurea lappa and Rumex nepalensis were found with highest use value and frequency of citation. The younger generation is unaware of this traditional treasure and takes no interest due to modernization. The current study has an important contribution towards the preservation of indigenous plants-based knowledge from extinction. New ethnoveterinary uses in the study area were found for enterotoxaemia, dehydration, indigestion, dewormer, etc. The phytochemical and pharmacological investigations to isolate the active compound and testing the in vitro or in vivo efficiency of the above mentioned plants against the targeted veterinary diseases are important. In addition to this, critical toxicological investigations are required for safe and secure use of documented ethno-medicines.

Supporting information

S1 File. Sample of questionnaire used during field survey for obtaining ethnobotanical information.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig

(JPG)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Munir Ahmed for his technical inputs, the interviewees and other inhabitants of Neelum valley, AJ&K, for their contribution to this work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Lans C, Turner N, Khan T, Brauer G, and Boepple W. “Ethnoveterinary medicines used for ruminants in British Columbia, Canada,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2007, vol. 3, article 11. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ganesan S, Chandhirasekaran M and Selvaraj A. “Ethnoveterinary healthcare practices in southern districts of Tamil Nadu,” Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 2008, vol. 7, no. 2,:347–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sullivan K, Shealy CN. Complete Natural Home Remedies. Element Books Limited, Shaftesbury, UK., 1997; pp: 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Croom EM. Documenting and evaluating herbal remedies. Econ. Bot. 1983; 37: 13–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ayeni EA, Basiri B. Ethnoveterinary survey of plants used in treating livestock among the Fulani people of Girei, Adamawa State, Nigeria. World News of Natural Sciences. 2018; 16: 53–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Husain M. Geography of Jammu and Kashmir. Rajesh Publications, New Delhi, India. 2001; pp: 15–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dar MEI. Ethnobotanical Uses of Plants of Lawat District Muzaffarabad, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Asian J. Plant Sci., 2003; 2: 680–682. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lawrence WR. The Valley of Kashmir 1895. (Reprinted). Chinar Publishing House, Srinagar, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoareau L, Da-Silva EJ. Medicinal plants: A re-emerging health aid. Elect. J. Biotechnol. 1999;Vol 2. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ullah M, Khan MU, Mahmood A, Malik RN, Hussain M, Wazir SM, et al. An ethnobotanical survey of indigenous medicinal plants in Wana district, South Waziristan Agency, Pakistan. Journal of Ethno-pharmacology. 2013; 150(3): 918–924. 10.1016/j.jep.2013.09.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bullitta S. Re GA, Manunta MDI., Piluzza G. Traditional knowledge about plant, animal and mineral based remedies to treat cattle, pigs, horses and other domestic animals in Mediterrianian island of Sardinia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicines. 2018; 14(1): 50. 10.1186/s13002-018-0250-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lans C, Turner N, Khan T, Brauer G, Boepple W. Ethnoveterinary medicines used for ruminants in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicines. 2007; 3(1): 11. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dar GH., Vir J, Kachroo P, Buth HH. Ethnobotany of Kashmir 1, Sindh Valley. J. Econ. Tax. Bot,. 1984; 3: 668–675. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kachroo P, Nahvi IM. Ethnobotany of Kashmiris. In: Forest Flora of Srinagar and Plants of Neighbourhood. Singh G. and Kachroo P. (Eds.), Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ara S, Naqshi AR. Ethnobotanical studies in the Guraise Valley. J. Econ. Tax. Bot., 1992; 17: 657–678. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaul MK. Medicinal Plants of Kashmir and Ladakh, Temperate and cold Arid Himalaya. Indus Publishing Co. New Delhi. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shahzad KR, Malik ZH, Qureshi RA. Phytosociological survey of Samahni valley, Bhimber, Azad Kashmir. Pak. J. Forest., 1999; 49: 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dastagir G. Medicinal Plants of Mai Dhani Hill, Muzaffarabad, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Hamdard Medicus. 2001; 1: 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saghir IA, Awan AA, Mir SM, Khan A, Qureshi SJ, Bano S. Ethnobotanical studies of Chikar and its Allied Areas of District Muzaffarabad. J. Biol. Sci. 2001; 1: 1165–1170. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gorsi MS, Miraj S. Ethnomedicinal survey of plants of Khanabad Village and its Allied Areas, District Gilgit. Asian J. Plant Sci., 2002; 1: 604–615. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gorsi MS, Shahzad R. Medicinal uses of plants with particular reference to the people of Dhirkot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2002; 1: 222–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khan MA, Khan MA, Hussain M. Ethno Veterinary Medicinal Uses of Plants of Poonch Valley Azad Kashmir. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 2012.18(4): 495–507. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khan ZS, Khuroo AA, Dar GH. Ethnomedicinal survey of Uri, Kashmir Himalaya. Ind. J. Trad. Knowl. 2004; 3: 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sudarsanum G, Reddy MB, Nagaraju N. Veterinary crude drugs in Rayalaseema, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Pharm. 1995; 33(1): 52–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ole-Midron JO. The Maasai ethno-diagnostic skill of livestock diseases; A road to traditional bio prospecting. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003; 84(1): 79–83. 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00283-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lans C, Brown G. Observations on ethnoveterinary medicines in Trinidad and Tobago. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 1998; 35(2): 125–142. 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00055-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jost CC, Shermam DM, Thomson EF, Hesselton RM. Kamala (Mallotus philippinensis) fruit is ineffective as an antihelmintic against gastrointestinal nematodes in goats indigenous to Balochistan, Pakistan. Small Ruminant Res. 1996; 20: 147–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hammond JA, Fielding D, Bishop SC. Prospects for plant anthelmintics in tropical veterinary medicine. Vet. Res. Commun. 1997; 21: 213–228. 10.1023/a:1005884429253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Akhtar M S. Anthelmintic evaluation of indigenous plants for veterinary usage. Final Research Report (1983–88). University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan. 1988.
  • 30.Akhtar MS, Ahmad. Comparative efficacy of Mallotus philippinensis fruit (Kamala) or Nilzan drug against gastrointestinal cestodes in Beetal goats. Small Ruminants Res. 1992; 8: 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akhtar MS. Khan MNZI, Latif M. Anthelmintic activity of medicinal plants with particular reference to their use in animals in Indo-Pakistan subcontinents. Small Ruminants Res. 2000; 38: 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jabbar A, Raza MA, Iqbal Z, Khan N. An inventory of the ethnobotanicals used as anthelmintics in the southern Punjab (Pakistan). Journal of Ethnopharmacol., 2006; 108: 152–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tabassam SM, Iqbal Z, Jabbar A, Ud-Sindhu Z, Abbas R.Z. Documentation of Ethnoveterinary practices and evaluation of Azadirachta indica for treatment of sheep mange. 12th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Bexco, Busan, Korea, 2007.
  • 34.Farooq Z, Iqbal Z, Mushtaq S, Muhammad G, Iqbal MZ, Arshad M. Ethnoveterinary practices for the treatment of parasitic diseases in livestock in Cholistan desert (Pakistan). J. Ethnopharmaco., 2007; 118: 213–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dilshad S.M.R., Najeeb-ur-Rehman, Iqbal Z, Muhammad G, Iqbal A, Ahmed N. An inventory of the ethnoveterinary practices for reproductive disorders in cattle and buffaloes, Sargodha district of Pakistan. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2008; 117: 393–402. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abbasi AM, Khan SM, Ahmad M, Khan MA, Quave CL, Pieroni A. Botanical Ethnoveterinary therapies in three districts of Lesser Himalayas of Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethno-medicine, 2013; 9(1): 84. 10.1186/1746-4269-9-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aziz MA, Khan AH, Adnan M, Ullah H. Traditional uses of medicinal plants used by indigenous communities for veterinary practices at Bajaur Agency, Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicines, 2018; 14 (1): 11. 10.1186/s13002-018-0212-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ocvirk S, Kistler M, Khan S. Talukder SH, Hauner H. Traditional medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes in rural and urban areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh. An ethnobotanical survey. Journal of Ethnobiology Ethno-medicine. 2013; 9–43. 10.1186/1746-4269-9-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alexiades MN. Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical research: A Field Manual, 1996. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N.Y. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Martin GJ. Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Earths can Publications Ltd, London. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anonymous, “AJK at a glance”. Published by Planning & Development dept. Govt. of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, 2014.
  • 42.Stewart RR. An Annotated Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of West Pakistan and Kashmir, 1972. Fakhri Press, Karachi, Pakistan. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nasir E, Ali SI.. Flora of Pakistan, No. 1–187. 1970–1987. Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Univ. Karachi, Pakistan.
  • 44.BSI. Flora of India. Botanical Survey of India, 1996. Kolkatta, India.
  • 45.Zaman MB, Khan MS. Medicinal plants of West Pakistan. For. Inst. Pak., 1970; 38: 34–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tariq A, Mussarat S, Adnan M, AbdElsalam NM, Ullah R and Khan AL. Ethnoveterinary Study of Medicinal Plants in a Tribal Society of Sulaiman Range. The Scientific World Journal 2014. Volume 2014, Article ID 127526, 10 pages, 10.1155/2014/127526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ul Hassan H, Murad W, Tariq A, and Ahmad A, “Ethnoveterinary study of medicinal plants in Malakand Valley, District Dir (Lower), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan,” Irish Veterinary Journal, 2014, vol. 67, no. 1, article 6. 10.1186/2046-0481-67-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heinrich M, Edwards HS, Moerman DE, Leonti M. Ethnopharmacological field studies: a critical assessment of their conceptual basis and methods. J. Ethnopharmacol, 2009; 124: 1–17. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.03.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu YC, Dao ZL, Yang CY, Liu YT, Long CL. Medicinal plants used by Tibetans in Shangri-la, Yunnan, China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2009; 5: 15. 10.1186/1746-4269-5-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hart R, Bussmann R. Trans-Himalayan Transmission, or Convergence? Stauntonia (Lardizabalaceae) as an Ethnoveterinary Medicine. Medicina nei Secoli. 2018; 30(3): 929–948. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Marwat SK. Ethnophytomedicines for treatment of various diseases in DI Khan district, Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 2008; 24(2): 305–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Barboza RR, De MS, Souto W, Da J, Mourao S. The use of zootherapeutics in folk veterinary medicine in the district of Cubati, Paraiba State, Brazil. Journal. Of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2007; 3(1): 32. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Leeflang P. Some observations on Ethnoveterinary Medicine in Northern Nigeria,1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Khattak NS, Nouroz F, Rahman IU, Noreen S. Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants of district Karak, Pakistan. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2015; 171: 273–279. 10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Khuroo AA, Malik AH, Dar AR, Dar GH, Khan ZS. Ethno-veterinary medicinal uses of some plant species used by the Gujjar Tribes of Kashmir Himalaya. Asian. J. of Plant Sci. 2007; 6(1): 148–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bhatti RC, Nirmala C, Kaur A, Singh S, Kumar P, Kaur R, Sigh AN. Harnessing of local plant species by indigenous people of Hamirpur District for Ethno-veterinary purposes. Annals of Plant Sci. 2017; 6.12: 1898–1925. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Eswaran S, Boomibalagan P, Rathinavel S. Ethnoveterinary medicinal practices of the villagers of Usilampatti Taluk of Madurai district, India. International Journal of Botany. 2013; 9: 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bharati KA. Sharma B.L. Plants used as Ethnoveterinary medicines in Sikkim Himalayas. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 2012; 10: 339–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dhar U, Rawal RS, Upreti J. Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants-a case study in the Indian Himalaya. J. Biol. Conserv. 2000; 95: 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dar GH, Bhagat RC, Khan MA. Biodiversity of Kashmir Himalaya, Valley Book House, Srinagar, Kashmir. 2001; pp: 120–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Utkarsh GM, Gadgil M, Rao PRS. Intellectual property rights on biological resources: Benefiting from biodiversity and peoples knowledge. Curr. Sci., 1999; 77: 1418–1425. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Utkarsh G, Patenting life? Biodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights. Resonance. 2001; 2: 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ahmad H, Sirajuddin. Ethnobotanical profile of Swat. Proceedings of the 1st Training Workshop on Ethnobotany and its Application to Conservation, September 16–24, 1996, Islamabad, Pakistan. 1996; pp: 202–206.
  • 64.Haq I. Medicinal Plants of Mansehra District. Hamdard Medicus, NWFP, Pakistan, 1993; pp: 63–99.
  • 65.Hocking GM. Pakistan medicinal plants 1. Q. Planta Mater. Vegetation. 1958; 9: 103–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hussain F, Khalique A. Ethnobotanical studies on some plants of Dabargia hills, Swat. Proceedings of the 1st Training Workshop on Ethnobotany and its Application to Conservation, (TWEAC’96), NARC, Islamabad. 1996; 207–215.
  • 67.Pie SJ, Manandhar NP. Sources of some local medicines in the Himalayan Regions. Himalayan Ecosyst. 1987; pp: 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shinwari, ZK, Shah M. The ethnobotany of Kharan district, Baluchistan. Proceedings of the 1st Training Workshop on Ethnobotany and its Applications to Conservation. September 16–25, 1996, NARC, Islamabad. 1996; pp: 124–132.
  • 69.Chaudary MA, Khan MA, Hanif W. Ethno Veterinary Medicinal uses of plants from Samahni Valley, District Bhimber, (Azad Kashmir) Pakistan. Asian J. of Plant Sci. 2006; 5(2): 390–396. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ahmad KS, Hamid A, Nawaz F. et al. Ethnopharmacological studies of indigenous plants in Kel village, Neelum Valley, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017; 13: 68. 10.1186/s13002-017-0196-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Majeed M, Bhatti KH, Amjad MS, Abbasi AM, Bussmann RW, Nawaz F, et al. Ethno-veterinary uses of Poaceae in Punjab, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2020; 15(11): e0241705. 10.1371/journal.pone.0241705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad

7 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-31879

ETHNO-VETERINARY PRACTICES USED FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMAL DISEASES IN NEELUM VALLEY, KASHMIR HIMALAYA

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rafique,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

See my comments on file (2020-Ethno-veterinary Paper _Editor Comments.docx)

Please submit your revised manuscript by 30 December. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 and 4 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

3. Please upload a copy of Figure 4, to which you refer in your text on page 15. If the figure is no longer to be included as part of the submission please remove all reference to it within the text.

4.We note that [Figure(s) 5] in your submission contain map/satellite images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [5] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 3 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

6. Please include a copy of Table-4 and Table 5 which you refer to in your text on page 24 and 22.

7.We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

- https://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=ajps.2007.148.152

The text that needs to be addressed involves the Introduction, the caption for Figure 1, and the final paragraph of the Discussion.

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please see my comments in track changes

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper has been revised and following correction are recommended.

1. The abstract is very bulky and subjective. The text in the abstract should be reduced/trimmed.

2. The last paragraph of the introduction section given after the objectives should be shifted to discussion. It is not appropriate to give text after stating your specific objectives. The said paragraph also needs to be supported with appropriate references.

3. A brief detail of climate should be given in the methodology/study area section.

4. The 1st paragraph of the results section should be shifted to the methodology as it is not the results.

5. The tables and figures should be cited in the results text.

6. Authors should correlate their own results to the text given in the discussion section.

7. The conclusion section is also bulky, just like abstract and needs reduction in bulk.

Reviewer #2: Review comments of manuscript PONE-D-20-31879

The manuscript presented the ethnoveterinary knowledge of plants, which is used by the local inhabitants in Neelum Valley, Kashmir Himalaya for various disease of animals. The most important issue is that the manuscript was found to have a very significant degree of overlap with existing articles. I have identified a large sections in the manuscript that seem to be taken verbatim from other sources and without giving proper references to these sources and without identifying the text as a word by word citation.

I dont recommend its publication in the form in which it is presented my recommendation is reject and resubmit, I therefore kindly request the authors to provide a substantially revised version of this manuscript to address these concerns and some others suggestions, which is annotated directly in PDF. Note that not all matches in your report will be of concern, in particular commonly found phrases in manuscripts will be highlighted regardless and can be ignored (e.g., acknowledgments section and technical language in method section).

Some others basics missing which I have found and that in each case are necessary for a sound publication as:

The language is not suitable for publication; the manuscript needs a major English revision before being submitted. Formatting of the paper is very poor. Check the manuscript thoroughly for spelling mistake and grammar.

The abstract is not clear and with many serious grammar mistakes.

Your introduction needs more detail. I suggest that you improve the description in the last lines to provide more justification for your study (specifically, you should expand upon the knowledge gap being filled). Also, write the clear objectives of the study.

The methodology section is poorly organized. No information is available about how the study was design etc.

The results is very poorly presented.

Discussion is not result based, also need improvement grammatically. The whole section has to be revised not only for the language, but also for its structure.

Formatting of tables are in poor order. Please provide voucher specimens number in the table.

The conclusion is overstated, and the major results of the research were not reported.

Critically check your references, some references have missing volume number and page number. Follow Plos One journals guidelines for all references.

There are more annotations in the Pdf, which should be considered by the authors.

Reviewer #3: 1.please shorten the abstract. Such as it went into too many details of the informers.

2.Pay attention to reference 64 in the introduction part. Aren’t they labeled by number orders?

3.Study area in the materials and methods should be clear. I do not understand the necessarity of the first sentence. The investigation was done in a small part of the Neelum Valley. Do they really represent the whole area? If not, you should point out the actual area you covered. Only about a hundred informers were collected, compared to over 1 million population. That is really a small sampling. It would be nice if the sampling area is labeled in the figure 5.

4.To make the best use of the information generated in this paper, I would suggest to compare the medicine with other papers that generated from nearby area in the country.

Reviewer #4: The manuscript is well written but still needs substantial revision and English correction. Author knowledge regarding the study seems to be very narrow and lacks innovative interpretation. More literature study not restricted to study area only but also the Himalaya region is the most. See attachment.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Zia-ur-rehman Mashwani

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review comment.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-31879_reviewer.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-31879_reviewer.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: 2020-Ethno-veterinary Paper _Editor Comments.docx

Decision Letter 1

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad

20 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-31879R1

ETHNO-VETERINARY PRACTICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMAL DISEASES IN NEELUM VALLEY, KASHMIR HIMALAYA, PAKISTAN

PLOS ONE

Dear Sardar Rafique Khan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

I have significant concerns about the grammar, usage, and overall readability of the manuscript.  Furthermore, many shortcoming still exist in your manuscript which need to be addressed properly. You can find my comments on file (Manuscript with editor comments).  I believe that the manuscript is much more likely to be accepted if it is easy to read and understand. We therefore request that you revise the text to fix the grammatical errors and improve the overall readability of the text before we can reach any decision.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by 19 February If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

After assessing your manuscript, I have found significant concerns about the grammar, usage, and overall readability of the manuscript. I believe that the manuscript is much more likely to be accepted if it is easy to read and understand. Moreover, there are many shortcomings in your study. You can find my comments on the file attached. Your are therefore requested to revise your manuscript and fix the grammatical errors and improve the overall readability of the text.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Manuscript with editor comments.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250114.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


6 Feb 2021

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as 1.A separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

2.A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

3. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers .docx

Decision Letter 2

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad

23 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-31879R2

ETHNO-VETERINARY PRACTICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMAL DISEASES IN NEELUM VALLEY, KASHMIR HIMALAYA, PAKISTAN

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rafiq,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

Address all the comments carefully in attached file (Manuscript_AE)

Please submit your revised manuscript by March 30, 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Carefully revise and address all the comments in attached file.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Manuscript_AE.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250114.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


24 Mar 2021

All the suggested changes and improvements have been made accordingly. Response to the reviewer has been developed and uploaded separately as well.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers .docx

Decision Letter 3

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad

31 Mar 2021

ETHNO-VETERINARY PRACTICE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMAL DISEASES IN NEELUM VALLEY, KASHMIR HIMALAYA, PAKISTAN

PONE-D-20-31879R3

Dear Dr. Rafiq,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Check minor grammatical mistakes throughout the manuscript. Also cross-check scientific names.

Reviewers' comments:

Attachment

Submitted filename: Revised Manuscript-4.docx

Acceptance letter

Khawaja Shafique Ahmad

5 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-31879R3

ETHNO-VETERINARY PRACTICE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMAL DISEASES IN NEELUM VALLEY, KASHMIR HIMALAYA, PAKISTAN

Dear Dr. Rafique Khan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Khawaja Shafique Ahmad

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Sample of questionnaire used during field survey for obtaining ethnobotanical information.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig

    (JPG)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review comment.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-31879_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-31879_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2020-Ethno-veterinary Paper _Editor Comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers .docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Manuscript with editor comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers .docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Manuscript_AE.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers .docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Revised Manuscript-4.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES