Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250595

Nutritional status, dementia, and mobility among nursing home’s residents: First exhaustive cross-sectional study in Limousin territory (France)

Philippe Fayemendy 1,2,3,#, Gustave Mabiama 1,2,4,*,#, Thibault Vernier 1,#, Aude Massoulard-Gainant 3,5,, Carole Villemonteix 3,, Jean-Claude Desport 1,2,3,#, Pierre Jésus 1,2,3,#
Editor: Sıdıka Bulduk6
PMCID: PMC8087088  PMID: 33930046

Abstract

Background

Aging is accompanied by a drop in the level of health and autonomy, within Western countries more and more people being cared for in nursing homes (NH). The nutritional data in NH in France remain poor, not exhaustive and not representative. The objective of the study was to assess the nutritional status, dementia and mobility patterns among residents of NH in the Limousin territory of France.

Methods

The study was cross-sectional, descriptive and exhaustive, conducted with the residents of 13 voluntary NH. Undernutrition was identified using French High Authority for Health criteria, and obesity if Body Mass Index >30, in the absence undernutrition criterion. The Mini Mental State examination scores was used for dementia assessment at the threshold of 24. The Mini Nutritional AssessmentTM was used for mobilitity assessment. The statistics were significant at the 5% threshold.

Results

866 residents (70.6% women) included with an average age of 85.3 ± 9.3 years. Undernutrition was 27.5%, obesity 22.9%, dementia 45.7% and very low mobility 68.9%. Women were older than men, more often undernourished, more often demented and more often had very low mobility (p<0.01). Undernutrition (p<0.0001) and low mobility (p<0.0001) were significantly higher among those with dementia versus those without dementia. Very low mobility was higher among undernourished (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Undernutrition and obesity are important problems in NH in France. Being a woman, having dementia and having a very low mobility may induce undernutrition.

Introduction

Between 2008 and 2016, the aging of the population and the increasing dependency of the oldest people in France led to an increase of 2.7% per year in the number of NH places, which in 2017 reached 605,000 [1]. Nutritional problems are notable in these establishments, both in terms of undernutrition and obesity.

Undernutrition in the elderly has multiple consequences in terms of morbidity (increased risk of infection, fall, pressure ulcer, bone embrittlement, deterioration of the psychological state, reduction of autonomy and quality of life, etc.), and constitutes a risk factor for mortality in NH [24]. The prevalence of undernutrition is evaluated in France up to 10% for the elderly at home and up to 40% for residents of nursing homes [4]. At the international level, the range in nursing homes is wider (1.5–66.5%), depending on the populations studied and the tools used, with an average estimated at 20%.

Although obesity in the elderly has sometimes been considered favorable from the point of view of mortality or morbidity (obesity paradox) [5], for many pathologies moderate or severe obesity seems deleterious, because of an increase in the risk of falls, arthritis, diabetes, bedsores, a reduction in autonomy [69]. Its prevalence in French NH is not known, but French data in the general population show that the prevalence of obesity increases with age, at least up to 75 years [10]. Data in the United States indicates an increase in the prevalence of obesity in NH between 1992 (15%) and 2015 (27.9%) [9].

Both undernutrition and obesity are associated in NH with an increase in the demand for care, therefore at increased personnel and material costs, and this increase is particularly marked among obese residents [8, 11].

Furthermore, the link between dementia and undernutrition or the risk of undernutrition is well known [1215], as well as the link between low mobility and obesity [12] or undernutrition and reduced physical capacity [16].

The nutritional data in nursing homes are very disparate with sometimes a lack of completeness and / or representativeness, whether they come from one or more nursing homes (Table 1) [2, 3, 9, 15, 16], and the prevalence figures specifically for France are based on evaluations or expert consensus than confirmed figures (Table 1) [17, 18].

Table 1. Undernutrition and obesity among elderly in nursing homes in certain high-income countries.

First author / year Country n Age (ys) Women (%) Undernutrition tools and thresholds Undernutrition (%) Obesity tools and thresholds Obesity (%)
Challa / 2007** [2] USA 128 514   74.4 BMI<18.5 12.1    
Chan / 2010 [3] Singapore 154 77 53.2 BMI<18.5 52    
MNA<17 39
Törmä / 2013 [16] Sweden 172 86.3 69.8 MNA-SF 30    
BMI<22 40.7
Vandewoude / 2019 [15] Belgium 2480 86.3 78 MNA SF 13.5    
Zhang / 2019**** [9] USA 1 743 443 (2005)     BMI<18.5 8.5 BMI> = 30 22.4 (2005)
1 517 872 (2015) BMI<18.5 7.2 BMI> = 30 27.9 (2015)
Jésus / 2012 [17] France 346 87.9 83.4 BMI<24 or MNA™<17 53.5 BMI > = 29 27.4
Desbordes / 2018* [18] France 248 88 78.2 BMI<21 or Alb<35 g/L or weight loss> = 5% 1 mo or > = 10% 6 mo 39.5

MNA™: Mini Nutritional Assessment™; SF: Short Form; BMI: Body Mass Index; n: number; mo: month

*newly admitted residents

**representative data

****long stay residents (> = 100d/y).

The Limousin Nutrition network (LINUT) is a structure of the Regional Health Agency (ARS) of the New Aquitaine Region in France. Since 2004, this network has been providing nutritional care in nursing homes, and has a preventive role in these establishments [19].

The objective of the study was to analyze the data of exhaustive nutritional evaluation surveys carried out between 2008 and 2014 in NH in three departments of the New Aquitaine region, in connection with the presence of dementia and with the mobility of the residents.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Regional Health Agency Network (LINUT) prior to data collection. The data were collected within the framework of the agreements signed between the Limousin Nutrition network (LINUT), health network of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Regional Health Agency and the Elderly Nursing Homes, which stipulate that patient data can be used for research purposes after approval by the patients or their legal representatives. The NH were all volunteers, they were contracted for clinical research with the LINUT network, and residents or their legal representatives had given their verbal informed consent for the assessments, noted on each residents’ file by the LINUT dieticians.

Consent for publication

According to the agreement signed between the Limousin Nutrition network (LINUT), health network of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Regional Health Agency and the Elderly Nursing Homes, data collected with the approval of patients or their legal representatives can be used for publication.

The exhaustive descriptive cross-sectional study covered 13 NH in the Limousin territory (including three departments and around 800,000 inhabitants), between 2008 and 2014. All residents of each NH were included, except those whose state of health, according to the doctor, did not allow the measurements or those who refused the measurements after being informed. The assessments were carried out by a doctor and a dietician from the network specializing in geriatrics, and lasted two to three days by NH, depending on the number of residents to be assessed.

Residents’ weight was measured with underwear using an electronic scale (SECA 813, Hamburg, Germany, to the nearest 0.1 kg) or an electronic weighing pan (SECA 634, Hamburg, Germany, to the nearest 0.1 kg or A&Z Gastineau, Roissy, France, to the nearest 0.1 kg). The size was measured using a wall measurement to the nearest 0.1 cm. For patients who cannot be verticalized, measuring the heel-to-knee distance using an appropriate measuring rod (Securimed 2068, Cappelle-la-Grande, France, to within 0.5 cm) made it possible to obtain the size using the Chumlea formulas [20]. The nutritional status of residents was determined according to the French criteria of the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) of 2007 for people over the age of 70 [21], and the 2003 French criteria for people under the age of 70 [22]. Undernutrition was present if i) the BMI was <21 for residents over the age of 70, and <18.5 for other residents, or if ii) the weight loss was > = 5% in one month or > = 10% in six months, or else iii) the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA™) was <17 in residents over 70 years of age. Overweight was defined by the existence of a BMI between 25 and 29.9 for people under 70, or between 27 and 29.9 for people over 70 years old. Obesity was defined by the existence of a BMI > = 30, whatever the age. For cost reasons and possible differences in normality limits depending on the measurement laboratory, albuminemia was not achieved.

The Mini Mental State (MMS) was used to determine whether or not dementia was present at the threshold of 24 [23]. Mobility was assessed using an MNA™ criterion, according to two classes: "very low mobility", corresponding to a bedridden state or the resident’s ability to move only from bed to chair, "poor or good mobility" corresponding mobility possible inside and outside the NH. This MNA™ criterion was applied regardless of the age of the residents. The study was validated by the Ethics Committee and the Board of Directors of the LINUT Network, a structure of the Agence Régionale de Santé Nouvelle Aquitaine, in accordance with the agreement signed with the nursing homes for the use of data collected for scientific purposes, after acceptance by the residents or their legal representatives.

The databases were set up prospectively. They were processed anonymously using Statview™ software (SAS, Cary, USA). The quantitative values are presented as means ± standard deviation and the qualitative values as percentages. The analysis used Fischer’s exact test, Student’s t test and ANOVA. There was no multivariate analysis, given the limited number of criteria available in NH. The significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

Results

The assessments covered 866 of the 1,043 residents of NHs surveyed (83%), or 66.6±14.7 residents/NH, and 17.0% of the residents could not be assessed either because of their refusal or because of their fragility. The M/F ratio was 0.42, or 70.6% of residents are women. The average age of residents was 85.3±9.3 years, the average BMI 26.4±5.3. Dementia was identified in 45.7% of the cases, and 31.1% of the residents were bedridden or could only go from bed to chair. Undernutrition affected 27.5% of residents, obesity 22.9% (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Nutritional status of all residents assessed.

Fig 1

Women were older than men (87.1±8.1 versus 80.7±10.4 years, p<0.0001), more often undernourished than men (30.7% versus 20.0%, p = 0.01), with a tendency to be overweight less often (15.0 versus 20.4%, p = 0.058) (Table 2). They were more often demented (51.9% versus 30.8%, p<0.0001) and more often had very low mobility (66.3% versus 75.4%, p = 0.02).

Table 2. Nutritional Status of residents based on gender, dementia, and mobility.

Nutritional status Gender Dementia Mobility
Women (%) Men (%) p With (%) Without (%) p Very low (%) Poor or good (%) p
<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Undernutrition 30.7 20.0 0.01 34.4 19.2 <0.0001 49.5 16.7 <0.0001
Normality 32.2 34.9 >0.05 32.2 32.2 >0.05 22.7 32.2 0.01
Overweight 15.0 20.4 0.058 12.9 19.9 0.01 7.9 20.5 <0.0001
Obesity 22.1 24.7 >0.05 19.5 28.5 0.004 19.9 25.5 >0.05

Statistical tests used: ANOVA (or Kruskal-Wallis); Bold values indicate p<0.05.

The nutritional status was different (p<0.0001) depending on the presence or the absence of dementia (Table 2). Compared to non-demented residents, the demented group were more often undernourished (p<0.0001), less often overweight (p = 0.01) or obese (p = 0.004) and more often very limited in terms of mobility (38.9% of cases versus 23.9%, p<0.0001).

The nutritional status was different (p<0.0001) depending on mobility (Table 2). Residents with very low mobility were more often undernourished (p<0.0001) less often with normal nutritional status (p = 0.01) or overweight (p<0.0001) than those with poor or good mobility. There was no significant difference for obesity.

There was no significant difference for nutritional status according to NH, either in overall analysis of the four classes of nutritional status (p = 0.62) or by comparing the class of undernourished residents with the others (p = 0.60) or by comparing the class of obese residents to the non-obese (p = 0.55). There was no significant difference for the nutritional status according to the year of the assessment, whether in overall analysis of the four nutritional status classes (p = 0.97) or by comparing the class of undernourished residents to that of non-undernourished (p = 0.85) or by comparing the class of obese residents to that of non-obese (p = 0.13).

Discussion

This study is the first in France which gives exhaustive results on the nutritional status of residents in NH. It is not possible to claim that it is representative of all French nursing homes, but it nevertheless seems robust. Indeed, the average age of residents was close to that of all French NH (85.3 and 86.4 years respectively) [24] and the same was true for the sex ratio (respectively 70.6 and 73.6% of women) [24] and the prevalence of dementia (45.7 and 40.0% respectively) [24]. Finally, the study covered all residents of the establishments investigated, and this exhaustiveness was only found in one French study, but which related to a single nursing home [18].

In our study, the prevalence of undernutrition was probably underestimated, due to the fact that albuminemia was not taken into account. This prevalence (27.5%) corresponds to the estimate in France, which is 14.5 to 60.8% [17, 18] (Table 1). In a previous French study [17], the threshold for BMI was 24, and undernutrition was samely overestimated. The difference with the prevalence of undernutrition in the 2012 French survey in the general population is major, since this figure was 2.6% for those aged 80 and over [10], but this survey focused on elderly people at home, a priori in better health than people in NH. Undernutrition is therefore an important problem in NH in France.

At an international level, the range of prevalence is even wider (1.5–71%) (Table 1), probably linked to very different populations and the use of equally different tools and thresholds for defining undernutrition. One recent study carried out in the USA have found a prevalence of less than 10% [9], the criterion was the existence of a BMI<18.5, with high prevalence of obesity as a counterpoint.

The higher prevalence of undernutrition in women appeared to be related to older age and the higher frequency in women with dementia and very low mobility. The increase in the risk of undernutrition in women that we have found is not always reported [2, 13, 25]. Given the predominance of women in nursing homes, and the frequency of co-morbidities in them, we can think that additional studies could be interesting on this subject.

There are many explanations for the link between dementia and undernutrition. Indeed, there may exist in demented residents, anorexia, food refusal, difficulty in eating related to disorders of recognition of food or cutlery, an increase in the energy expenditure of physical activity in the wandering dementia [12, 26, 27]. Our study showed that demented residents had lower mobility than non-demented people, and yet were less often overweight, which suggests, for the population studied, that food was insufficient. Overall, the study seems to indicate that, for demented residents, good availability of staff, careful nutritional monitoring and early management of undernutrition are necessary as already pointed out [26, 28, 29]. Regarding the association between very low mobility and the presence of undernutrition, our results are in agreement with other studies [28, 29]. Of course, the relationship between the two criteria can be understood in both directions: undernutrition can lead to sarcopenia, with a reduction in mobility, and low mobility can limit autonomy and the possibilities of eating. The higher prevalence of dementia may be a major reason, but other intercurrent conditions conventionally providing undernutrition (infections, pain, depression, neurological diseases, etc.) can lead to a decrease in mobility and therefore interfere.

The prevalence of obesity among the residents we studied was 22.9%. This result seems robust, because patients with BMI in an obesity zone, but who had an involuntary weight loss were not counted as obese. To our knowledge, there is only one French study on obesity in NH, which is neither representative nor exhaustive [17], and which reports 27.4% of obese residents in a selected population of 346 residents. Recent international results, mainly from the USA, indicate a prevalence range of 15 to 30.7% (Table 1). In addition, according to the 2012 French survey of the general population, 16% of people aged 80 and over were obese [10]. These results show that obesity is probably more frequent in nursing homes than in the general population of elderly people and therefore should not be underestimated. Indeed, it can increase the risk of morbi-mortality in the elderly [5] and, as in non-elderly adults, it can cause complications that lead to a reduction in quality of life and overuse of drugs [8]. The increase in the prevalence of obesity in nursing homes observed in the USA [9, 11] can obviously affect European countries, with important consequences in terms of costs, linked to the increase in needs in personnel and adapted materials [9, 11]. This should be the subject of reflection within health systems.

The absence of differences in the nutritional status of residents over the seven-year period considered suggests that the problems do not seem to vary over time in the region studied. For obesity, in particular, the situation seems stable, in contrast to the data in the USA [9]. It would however be interesting to repeat this study annually on a longer period.

The study has several limitations. In fact, 17.0% of residents could not be assessed either because of their refusal, or because of their very fragile condition. It was therefore not possible to compare residents excluded from included. However, the excluded were probably seriously handicapped, since the NH where the exclusions were the most numerous (n = 45) was also the only one that received almost only dementias. There is therefore a good chance that exclusions, combined with the impossibility of obtaining an albuminemia have reduced the prevalence of undernutrition. Likewise, the prevalence of dementia and poor physical activity were likely to be reduced. It is more likely that finer criteria could have been used, in particular regarding patient mobility. An ADL score [30] would have given more precise elements. Regarding dementias, the seriousness of the disease has not been recorded. These details could not be obtained for reasons of availability of the evaluation staff, or else, if these elements were present in the residents’ files, their time lag made them unusable. Finally, for reasons of team availability and access to files, the study was unable to integrate several factors of clinical condition as well as biological data from residents in NH. This is the main reason why we did not carry out a multivariate analysis of the criteria linked to undernutrition or obesity.

Conclusion

The nutritional screening carried out in 13 NH with 866 residents revealed undernutrition in 27.5% of cases and obesity in 22.9% cases, in the ranges of the usual values in NH. Undernutrition and obesity in NH are notable problems in France, compared to elderly people at home. The consequences in terms of staff workload and costs are probably significant. The women were older, more often malnourished, demented and had more limited mobility than the men. Undernutrition and low mobility were significantly higher among those with dementia versus those without dementia. Very low mobility was higher among undernourished.

Acknowledgments

We thank the LINUT network, caregivers, and residents of nursing homes of Limousin territory.

Data Availability

Under the agreements signed between Elderly Nursing homes and the Limousin Nutrition network (LINUT), health network of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Regional Health Agency, data are collected, saved, and protected within the LINUT network. These data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by the network, and are not accessible, because considered as medical files. These third-party data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by the network, and are not accessible, because considered as medical files. The restrictions were imposed by LINUT’S network. Any request can be addressed to Dr Jean Louis Fraysse, 16 Rue du Cluzeau, 87170 Isle, frayssejl@limut.fr.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (Insee). Tableau de l’économie française, édition 2019, personnes âgées dépendantes, mars 2019. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3676717?sommaire=3696937.
  • 2.Challa S, Sharkey JR, Chen M, Phillips CD. Association of residents, facility, and geographic characteristics with chronic undernutrition in a nationally represented sample of older residents in US nursing homes. J Nutr Health Aging 2007;11(22):179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chan M, Lim YP, Ernest A, Tan TL. Nutritional assessment in an asian nursing home and its association with mortality. J Nutr Health Aging 2010;14:23–28. 10.1007/s12603-010-0005-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raynaud-Simon A. Stratégie de dépistage et de prise en charge de la dénutrition: personne âgée. In: Traité de Nutrition Clinique, SFNEP ed., Paris, 2016:687–694.
  • 5.Janssen I, Mark AE. Elevated body mass index and mortality risk in the elderly. Obes Rev 2007;8:41–59. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00248.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF, Klein S. Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO, the Obesity Society. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:923–934. 10.1093/ajcn/82.5.923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bradway C, DuResta J, Fleshner I, Polomano RC. Obesity in nursing homes: a critical review. J Am Ger Soc 2008;56:1528–1535. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01821.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Felix HC. Safety of obese persons in nursing homes. Med Care 2018;56:1032–1034. 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang N, Field T, Mazor KM, Zhou Y, Lapane KL, Gurwitz JH. The Increasing Prevalence of Obesity in Residents of U.S. Nursing Homes: 2005–2015. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019. November 13;74(12):1929–1936. 10.1093/gerona/gly265 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inserm, Kantar Health, Roche. ObEpi 2012. Enquête épidémiologique nationale sur le surpoids et l’obésité. 2012 https://www.roche.fr/content/dam/rochexx/roche-fr/roche_france/fr_FR/doc/obepi_2012.pdf.
  • 11.Marihart CL, Brunt AR, Geraci AA. The high price of obesity in nursing homes. Care Manag J 2015;16:14–19. 10.1891/1521-0987.16.1.14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Galesi LF, Leandro-Meri VA, Marques de Oliveira MR. Association between indicators of dementia and nutritional status in institutionalised older people. Int J Older Peop Nurs 2012;8:236–43. 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00321.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tamura BK, Bell CL, Masaki KH. Factors associated with weight loss, low BMI, and malnutrition among nursing home patients: a systematic review of literature. J Am Dir Assoc 2013;14:649–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Favaro-Moreira N, Krausch-Hofmann S, Matthys C, Vereeken C, Vanhauwaert E, Declercq A, et al. Risk factors for malnutrition in older adults: a systematic review of the literature based on longitudinal data. Adv Nutr 2016;7:507–522. 10.3945/an.115.011254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vandewoude MFJ, van Wijngaarden JP, De Maesschalck L, Luiking YC, Van Gossum A. The prevalence and health burden of malnutrition in Belgian older people in the community or residing in nursing homes: results of the NutriAction II study. Aging Clin Exp Research 2019;31:175–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Törmä J, winblad U, Cederholm T, Saletti A. does undernutrition still prevail among nursing home residents? Clin Nutr 2013:32:562–568. 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jesus P, Desport JC, Massoulard A, Villemonteix C, Baptiste A, Gindre-Poulvelarie L, et al. Nutritional assessment and follow-up of residents with and without dementia in nursing homes in the Limousin region of France: a health network initiative. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:504–508. 10.1007/s12603-012-0017-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Desbordes F, Jouveau S, Broussaudier A, Noailletas V, Fayemendy P, Morin B, et al. État nutritionnel des résidents d’un établissement d’hébergement pour personnes âgées dépendantes (EHPAD) et liens entre la dénutrition, la consommation de compléments nutritionnels oraux et le service à l’assiette. Nutr Clin Metabol 2018;32:225–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Desport JC, Fraysse JL, Massoulard A, Gouraud M, Marchaisseau E, Philippon S, et al. LINUT: un réseau de nutrition pour les personnes âgées. Nutr Clin Metabol 2006;20:142–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chumlea WC, Guo S, Wholihan K, Cockram D, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Stature prediction equations for elderly non-hispanic white, non-hispanic black, and mexican american persons developed from NHANES III Data. J Am Diet Assoc 1998;98:137–142. 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00036-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haute Autorité de Santé. Stratégie de prise en charge en cas de dénutrition protéino-énergétique chez la personne âgée. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS; 2007. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/denutrition_personne_agee_2007_-_recommandations.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Agence nationale d’accréditation et d’évaluation en santé. Évaluation diagnostique de la dénutrition protéino-énergétique des adultes hospitalisés. Paris: ANAES; 2003. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/denutrition_recos_2006_09_25__14_20_46_375.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 1975;12:189–198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ministère des solidarités et de la santé. Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques (DREES). 728000 résidents en établissements d’hébergement pour personnes âgées en 2015. Etudes et résultats 2017;1015:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Blaum CS, Fries BE, Fiatarone MA. Factors Associated With Low Body Mass Index and Weight Loss in Nursing Home Residents. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995;50:M162–168. 10.1093/gerona/50a.3.m162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gillette-Guyonnet S, Nourashemi F, Andrieu S, de Glisezinski I, Ousset PJ, Rivière D, et al. Weight loss in Alzheimer disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;7(suppl):637S–642S. 10.1093/ajcn/71.2.637s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Engelheart S, Brummer R. Assessment of nutritional status in the elderly: a proposed function-driven model. Food Nutr Res 2018;62:1366–1372. 10.29219/fnr.v62.1366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Salva A, Coll-Planas L, Bruce S, De Groot L, Andrieu S, Abellan G, et al. Nutritional Assessment of Residents in Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCFs): Recommendations of the Task Force on Nutrition and Ageing of the IAGG European Region and the IANA. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:475–483. 10.1007/s12603-009-0097-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bell CL, Masaki KH, Amella EJ. Factors associated with weight loss, low BMI, and malnutrition among nursing home patients: a systematic review of the litterature. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:649–655. 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in the development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 1970;10:20–30. 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Sıdıka Bulduk

21 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-40393

Nutritional status, dementia and mobilityamongnursing home’s residents:First exhaustive cross-sectional study in Limousin Territory (France)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mabiama,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I am very much thankful to the reviewers for their deep and thorough review.

Some minor revisions are required. Please carefully check the reviewers’ comments.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 07 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sıdıka Bulduk, Prof. Dr.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please amend your current ethics statement to clarify whether the IRB institute approved the study protocol prior to data collection.

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

For additional information about PLOS ONE ethical requirements for human subjects research, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research.

Furthermore, Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was suitably informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal).

3. We noted in your submission details that a portion of your manuscript may have been presented or published elsewhere.

"Only abstract was published in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, December 2020."

Please clarify whether this publication was peer-reviewed and formally published. If this work was previously peer-reviewed and published, in the cover letter please provide the reason that this work does not constitute dual publication and should be included in the current manuscript.

4.  We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: ts of 13 voluntary NH. Undernutrition was identified using French High

Authority for Health criteria, and obesity if Body Mass Index >30, in the absence

undernutrition criterion. The Mini Mental State was used for dementia assessment at

the threshold of 24. The Mini Nutritional Assessment TM was used for mobilitity

assessment. Significant statistics at the 5% threshold. Article is a current topic and written in good language. It is suitable to be published in the journal

Reviewer #2: Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) (Limit 200 to 20000 Characters)

Please see my attached review, the manuscript can be published after corrections

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Prof. Hande Sahin

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-40393_reviewer.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250595.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


2 Apr 2021

My co-authors and I would like to thank you for reviewing, comments and suggestions made on our article. You will find in this letter the answers to the various points raised.

1. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Regional Health Limousin Nutrition Network (LINUT) prior to data collection.

2. The Nursing Homes (NH) were all volunteers, they were contracted for clinical research with the LINUT network, and residents or their legal representatives gave their verbal informed consent for the assessments, noted on each residents’file by the LINUT dieticians.

3. Part of the work was presented by Pierre Jesus as e-poster (P419 - ASSESSMENT OF THE NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF 866 OLDER PEOPLE IN NURSING HOMES, AND LINKS WITH DEMENTIA AND MOBILITY) at the virtual congress on Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism organized by ESPEN from 19 to 21 September 2020. This e-poster published by Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 2020, 40, pp.590 does not value all aspects of the work done and results obtained, hence the idea of publishing the entire article in PLOS ONE.

4. The data are the property of LINUT network, a network of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Health Regional Agency. These data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by this network, and are not accessible, because they are considered as medical files. These third-party data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by the network, and are not accessible, because considered as medical files. 4. The data are the property of LINUT network, a network of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Health Regional Agency. These data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by this network, and are not accessible, because they are considered as medical files. The restrictions were imposed by LINUT'S network. Any request can be addressed to Dr Jean Louis Fraysse, 16 Rue du Cluzeau, 87170 Isle, frayssejl@limut.fr

Hoping you will agree with our responds.

Sincerely.

Gustave MABIAMA.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Sıdıka Bulduk

12 Apr 2021

Nutritional status, dementia and mobility among nursing home’s residents : First exhaustive cross-sectional study in Limousin Territory (France)

PONE-D-20-40393R1

Dear Dr. Mabiama,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sıdıka Bulduk, Prof. Dr.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

In the Abstract Section, please write within, not with in.

In the Highlights Section, the sentence should be written like that: Undernutrition and low mobility were significantly higher among demented persons.

Page 15, “walking dementia” ??. The authors should improve the sentence.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Sıdıka Bulduk

19 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-40393R1

Nutritional status, dementia, and mobility among nursing home’s residents: First exhaustive cross-sectional study in Limousin Territory (France)

Dear Dr. Mabiama:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sıdıka Bulduk

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-40393_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Under the agreements signed between Elderly Nursing homes and the Limousin Nutrition network (LINUT), health network of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Regional Health Agency, data are collected, saved, and protected within the LINUT network. These data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by the network, and are not accessible, because considered as medical files. These third-party data are linked with personal information of each resident followed by the network, and are not accessible, because considered as medical files. The restrictions were imposed by LINUT’S network. Any request can be addressed to Dr Jean Louis Fraysse, 16 Rue du Cluzeau, 87170 Isle, frayssejl@limut.fr.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES